Search

Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Background: The best management after ileocolonic resection is still unknown in Crohn's disease (CD). We compared step-up and top-down approaches to prevent short and long-term postoperative recurrences in CD patients., Methods: From a comprehensive database, consecutive CD patients who underwent intestinal resection (2014-2021) were included. Top-down (biologics started within the first month after surgery) or step-up strategies (no biologic between surgery and colonoscopy at 6 months) were performed with systematic colonoscopy at 6 months and therapeutic escalation if Rutgeerts index was ≥i2a (endoscopic postoperative recurrence). Propensity score analysis was applied for each comparison., Results: Among 115 CD patients, top-down was the most effective strategy to prevent endoscopic postoperative recurrence (46.8% vs 65.9%, P = .042) and to achieve complete endoscopic remission (Rutgeerts index = i0; 45.3% vs 19.3%; P = .004) at 6 months. We did not observe any significant difference between the 2 groups regarding clinical postoperative recurrence (hazard ratio [HR], .86 [0.44-1.66], P = .66) and progression of bowel damage (HR, 0.81 [0.63-1.06], P = .12). Endoscopic postoperative recurrence at 6 months was associated with increased risk of clinical postoperative recurrence (HR, 1.97 [1.07-3.64], P 0.029) and progression of bowel damage (HR, 3.33 [1.23-9.02], P = .018). Among the subgroup without endoscopic postoperative recurrence at 6 months, the risks of clinical postoperative recurrence and progression of bowel damage were significantly improved in the top-down group (HR, 0.59 [0.37-0.94], P = .025; and HR, 0.73 [0.63-0.83], P < .001, respectively)., Conclusions: Top-down strategy should be the preferred management to prevent short and long-term postoperative recurrence in CD., (© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Crohn’s & Colitis Foundation. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Background: Endoscopic mucosal healing is the current therapeutic target in Crohn's disease. However, transmural healing could lead to better outcomes., Aims: To assess whether transmural healing or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) healing are better therapeutic targets than endoscopic mucosal healing to predict long-term improved outcome in Crohn's disease METHODS: From our MRI database, we retrospectively identified all Crohn's disease patients who had MRI and colonoscopy within a 3-month interval (median interval = 17.5 days). Four groups were considered: endoscopic mucosal healing (no ulceration or aphthoid erosion), MRI healing (no MRI signs of inflammation and no complication), transmural healing (combination of endoscopic and MRI healing) or no healing. Outcomes were time to surgery, bowel damage progression, hospitalisation, major outcomes (one of the three previous endpoints) and Crohn's disease-related drug discontinuation. Results were expressed in multivariable analyses adjusted on potential confounders (hazard ratio (HR) [95% confidence interval])., Results: Among 154 patients with Crohn's disease, 51.9% (80/154), 10.4% (16/154), 19.5% (30/154) and 18.2% (28/154) achieved no healing, endoscopic mucosal healing, MRI healing and transmural healing, respectively. Transmural healing (HR = 0.05 [0.00-0.40], P = 0.002) and MRI healing (HR = 0.09 [0.00-0.47], P = 0.005) were associated with lower risk of bowel damage progression than endoscopic mucosal healing. In addition, achieving transmural healing or MRI healing reduced the risk of experiencing major outcomes compared to endoscopic mucosal healing (HR = 0.28 [0.00-0.74], P = 0.01). Patients with transmural healing also had a decreased risk of relapse-related drug discontinuation (HR = 0.35 [0.13-0.95], P = 0.039) compared to those with endoscopic mucosal healing., Conclusion: Transmural healing and MRI healing are associated with lower risk of bowel damage progression than endoscopic mucosal healing and could be considered as better therapeutic targets in Crohn's disease., (© 2020 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

A 58-year-old man presented with fever and chest pain 11 days after atrial fibrillation catheter ablation. The diagnosis of pericardio-oesophageal fistula was made. Aggressive surgical management was decided. The patient was managed using extracorporeal life support, aortic valve replacement and a pulmonary patch, as well as an oesophageal stent. The patient was discharged from hospital approximately 2 months later. The use of a pulmonary patch is a rare but a highly effective technique that can be used in this indication., (© The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.)

Aim: To investigate the outcome of flexible endoscopic myotomy performed with the Hook knife in patients with symptomatic Zenker's diverticulum (ZD)., Methods: All consecutive patients treated for ZD at our institution between 7/2012 and 12/2016 were included. The flexible endoscopic soft diverticuloscope-assisted technique with endoclips placement and Hook knife myotomy were performed in all patients. Here we report a retrospective review of prospectively collected data. Demographics, dysphagia score (Dakkak and Bennett), associated symptoms and adverse events were collected pre-procedure, at 2 and 6 mo post-procedure, and at the end of the follow-up period. Clinical success was defined as at least 1-point improvement in dysphagia score and a residual dysphagia score ≤ 1, with no need for reintervention. Dysphagia scores were compared before treatment and at end-of-follow-up using the Wilcoxon test., Results: Twenty-four patients were included. Mean size of ZD was 3.0 cm (range 2-8 cm). Mean number of sessions was 1.17/patient (range 1-3 sessions). Overall clinical success was 91.7%. Two adverse events (8.3%) occurred, and both were managed conservatively. No bleeding or perforation was reported. Mild pain was reported by 9 patients (37.5%). Median hospital stay was 1 d (range 1-6). Median follow-up was 19.5 mo (range 6-53). Mean ± SD dysphagia score was 2.25 ± 0.89 before treatment and decreased to 0.41 ± 0.92 at end-of-follow-up ( P < 0.001). Regurgitation and cough dropped from 91.7% and 50% to 12.5% and 0% at the end of follow-up, respectively. Recurrence was observed in 3 patients, and all 3 were symptom-free after one more session., Conclusion: The Hook knife, used in the soft diverticuloscope-assisted technique setting, is efficient and safe for treatment of ZD., Competing Interests: Conflict-of-interest statement: All authors disclosed no financial relationships relevant to this publication.

Background and aims  Colonoscopy is currently the reference method to detect colorectal neoplasia, yet some adenomas remain undetected. The water infusion technique and dying with indigo carmine has shown interesting results for reducing this miss rate. The aim of this study was to compare the adenoma detection rate (adenoma and adenocarcinoma; ADR) and the mean number of adenomas per patient (MAP) for blue-water infusion colonoscopy (BWIC) versus standard colonoscopy. Methods  We performed a multicenter, randomized controlled trial in eight units, including patients with a validated indication for colonoscopy (symptoms, familial or personal history, fecal occult blood test positive). Consenting patients were randomized 1:1 to BWIC or standard colonoscopy. All colonoscopies were performed by experienced colonoscopists. All colonoscopy quality indicators were prospectively recorded. Results  Among the 1065 patients included, colonoscopies were performed completely for 983 patients (514 men; mean age 59.1). The ADR was not significantly different between the groups; 40.4 % in the BWIC group versus 37.5 % in the standard colonoscopy group (odds ratio [OR] 1.13; 95 % confidence interval [CI] 0.87 - 1.48; P  = 0.35). MAP was significantly greater in the BWIC group (0.79) than in the standard colonoscopy group (0.64; P  = 0.005). For advanced adenomas, the results were 50 (10.2 %) and 36 (7.3 %), respectively ( P  = 0.10). The cecal intubation rate was not different but the time to cecal intubation was significantly longer in BWIC group (9.9 versus 6.2 minutes; P  < 0.001). Conclusion  Despite the higher MAP with BWIC, the routine use of BWIC does not translate to a higher ADR. Whether increased detection ultimately results in a lower rate of interval carcinoma is not yet known., Clinical Trials Registration: EudraCT 2012-A00548 - 35; NCT01937429., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None., (© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.)

Background and study aim  Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided pelvic abscess drainage has been reported but long-term data remain limited. This two-center study evaluated long-term outcome of EUS-guided pelvic abscess drainage. Patients and methods  Between May 2003 and December 2015, 37 consecutive patients were treated for perirectal or perisigmoid abscesses via EUS-guided drainage using plastic or lumen-apposing metal stent (LAMS). Clinical success was defined as complete resolution of the abscess on follow-up computed tomography (CT) scan at 4 weeks with symptom relief. Long-term success was defined as abscess resolution without the need for surgery and without recurrence on long-term follow-up (> 12 months). Results  Median abscess size was 60 mm (interquartile range 41 - 70). Causes were postsurgical (n = 31, 83.8 %) or secondary to medical conditions (n = 6, 16.2 %). EUS-guided drainage involved needle aspiration (n = 4), plastic stent placement (n = 29) or LAMS placement (n = 4 patients). Technical and clinical success was achieved in 37 patients (100 %; 95 % confidence interval [CI] 91 - 100) and 34 patients (91.9 %; 95 %CI 78 - 98), respectively (5 patients needed a second EUS-guided intervention within 14 days after drainage). One patient required surgery and one required best supportive care owing to persistent abscess. Early complications were perforation requiring surgery (n = 1), stent migration (n = 1), and rectal discomfort (n = 1). At a median follow-up of 64 months (IQR 19 - 81), two patients experienced abscess recurrence, at 3 and 12 months, respectively, and were treated surgically. Long-term success was achieved in 32 of 37 patients (86.5 %; 95 %CI 71 - 95). Conclusion  EUS-guided drainage of pelvic abscess is safe, has good long-term outcome, and should be considered as an alternative to percutaneous and surgical drainage., (© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.)

Background: Duodenal stenosis is one of the most common causes of failed ERCP for obstructive jaundice. Alternative approaches include anterograde biliary drainage, with higher morbidity. We report in this study the efficacy and safety of temporary placement of a covered duodenal self-expandable metal stent (cSEMS) in order to access the papilla and achieve secondary retrograde biliary drainage in patients with obstructive jaundice and failed ERCP due to concomitant duodenal stenosis., Methods: From June 2006 to March 2014, a total of 26 consecutive patients presenting obstructive jaundice without severe sepsis with failed ERCP due to duodenal invasion were enrolled. A temporary 7-day duodenal cSEMS was placed during the failed ERCP, and a second ERCP was attempted at day 7 after duodenal stent removal., Results: Duodenal cSEMS placement and retrieval were technically successful in all cases. Access to the papilla at day 7 was possible in 25 cases (96 %, 95 % CI 80-99 %). Secondary successful ERCP was achieved in 19 cases (76 %, 95 % CI 55-91 %, i.e., 73 %, 95 % CI 73-86 %, in an intention-to-treat analysis). Mean bilirubin level was 102 ± 90 µmol/L at baseline rising to 164 ± 121 µmol/L at day 7. There were 6 stent migrations and no adverse events recorded between the two ERCPs., Conclusions: When ERCP for obstructive jaundice fails due to duodenal invasion, temporary cSEMS placement offers a safe and effective way to achieve successful secondary ERCP while avoiding riskier endoscopic ultrasound or percutaneous transhepatic anterograde biliary drainage.

Introduction: Benign esophageal strictures arise from various etiologies and are frequently encountered. Although endoscopic dilation is still the first-line therapy, recurrent strictures do occur in approximately 10% of the cases and remains a challenge to gastroenterologists. Areas covered: A literature search was performed using PubMed and Google Scholar databases for original and review articles on endoscopic treatment of benign esophageal strictures. This review outlines the main available treatment options and its controversies in the management of refractory benign esophageal strictures. Expert commentary: Adding local steroid injections to dilation can be effective for peptic stenosis and strictures after endoscopic submucosal dissection, but remains uncertain for anastomotic strictures. Intralesional injections of mitomycin-C could be useful in corrosive strictures. Incisional therapy can be a reliable alternative in Schatzki rings and in anastomotic strictures, in experienced hands. By contrast, long-term outcome with endoprosthetic treatment is disappointing, and stent placement should be carefully considered and individualized.

We have developed a technique to study how good computers can be at diagnosing gastrointestinal lesions from regular (white light and narrow banded) colonoscopic videos compared to two levels of clinical knowledge (expert and beginner). Our technique includes a novel tissue classification approach which may save clinician's time by avoiding chromoendoscopy, a time-consuming staining procedure using indigo carmine. Our technique also discriminates the severity of individual lesions in patients with many polyps, so that the gastroenterologist can directly focus on those requiring polypectomy. Technically, we have designed and developed a framework combining machine learning and computer vision algorithms, which performs a virtual biopsy of hyperplastic lesions, serrated adenomas and adenomas. Serrated adenomas are very difficult to classify due to their mixed/hybrid nature and recent studies indicate that they can lead to colorectal cancer through the alternate serrated pathway. Our approach is the first step to avoid systematic biopsy for suspected hyperplastic tissues. We also propose a database of colonoscopic videos showing gastrointestinal lesions with ground truth collected from both expert image inspection and histology. We not only compare our system with the expert predictions, but we also study if the use of 3D shape features improves classification accuracy, and compare our technique's performance with three competitor methods.

Background and Goals: Using a self-expandable metallic stent (SEMS) in the cervical esophagus is controversial due to an increased risk of complications. Here we assessed a new type of SEMS purpose-designed for the cervical esophagus area., Study: Patients with malignant or benign stenosis within 4 cm distance of the upper esophageal sphincter who underwent placement of a SEMS with a shorter proximal head (Niti-S Esophageal Covered Stent-Cervical-type, NSECSC), were included. Main outcome measures were the functional outcome, tolerance, complications, recurrent dysphagia, and survival., Results: About 37 patients had an NSECSC placed between April 2008 and June 2013 for esophageal stenosis (malignant=20, benign=17), 5 with associated tracheoesophageal fistula. The mean stenosis-upper esophageal sphincter distance was 1.86±1.27 cm. The median follow-up was 150 days. Dysphagia improved in 27/37 cases (73%). Short-term and long-term tolerance without needing stent removal was 92% and 82%, respectively. The complication rate was 59% (22/37): 32% (n=14) major complications [fistula (3), perforation (3), aspiration pneumonia (5), laryngeal dyspnea (2), and bleeding (1)], and 27% (n=10) minor complications [pain (7) or dysphonia (3)]. A multivariate analysis confirmed a higher risk of major complications in cases of benign stenosis (odds ratio=5.2; 95% confidence interval, 1.05-25.90; P=0.04). Recurrent dysphagia occurred in 15 patients (obstruction=7, migration=8)., Conclusions: The NSECSC does not appear less morbid than standard SEMS in the cervical esophageal area, but could be useful in malignant indications as it is well-tolerated and offers effective palliation of the dysphagia. However, this device should not be used in benign cervical esophageal strictures or fistulas.

Background and Study Aim: Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided biliary access is an alternative to percutaneous access after failed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). This report presents 7 years' cumulative experience of EUS-guided biliary drainage for obstructive jaundice in patients with failed ERCP., Patients and Methods: Between February 2006 and February 2013, 101 patients (malignant = 98, benign = 3) with previous failed ERCP underwent an EUS intra- or extrahepatic approach with transluminal stenting or an EUS-guided rendezvous procedure with transpapillary stent placement. A single endoscopist performed all procedures., Results: A total of 71 patients underwent the intrahepatic approach (66 hepatogastrostomies and 5 EUS-guided rendezvous), and 30 underwent the extrahepatic approach (26 choledochoduodenostomies, 1 choledochojejunostomy, 1 choledochoantrostomy, and 2 EUS-guided cholangiographies). Technical and clinical success rates were 98.0 % and 92.1 %, respectively. There was no difference in efficacy between hepatogastrostomies and choledochoduodenostomies (94 % vs. 90 %; P = 0.69) or in major complications (10.6 % vs. 6.7 %; P = 1). Adverse events occurred in 12 patients (11.9 %): 10 in the hepatogastrostomy group (2 limited pneumoperitoneum, 1 hepatic hematoma, 5 bile leakage, 2 sepsis), and 2 in the choledochoduodenostomy group (1 arteriobiliary fistula and 1 sepsis). There were six procedure-related deaths, five among the first 50 patients and one among the last 51 patients. Hepatogastrostomy vs. choledochoduodenostomy, plastic vs. metal stenting, stent-in-stent vs. 1 stent, nasobiliary drain, or postoperative octreotide infusion were not prognostic of bile leakage., Conclusion: EUS-guided biliary drainage is an efficient technique, but is associated with significant morbidity that seems to decrease with the learning curve. It should be performed in tertiary care centers in selected patients. Prospective randomized studies are needed to compare EUS-guided biliary drainage with percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography drainage., (© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.)

Endoscopic sphincterotomy (ES) is the standard therapy in common bile duct (CBD) stones extraction. Large stones (≥ 12 mm) or multiple stones extraction may be challenging after ES alone. Endoscopic sphincterotomy followed by large balloon dilation (ESLBD) has been described as an alternative to ES in these indications. Efficacy, safety, cost-effectiveness and technical aspects of the procedure have been here reviewed. PubMed and Google Scholar search resulted in forty-one articles dealing with CBD stone extraction with 12 mm or more dilation balloons after ES. ESLBD is at least as effective as ES, and reduces the need for additional mechanical lithotripsy. Adverse events rates are not statistically different after ESLBD compared to ES for pancreatitis, bleeding and perforation. However, particular attention should be paid in patients with CBD strictures, which is identified as a risk factor of perforation. ESLBD is slightly cost-effective compared to ES. A small sphincterotomy is usually performed, and may reduce bleeding rates compared to full sphincterotomy. Dilation is performed with 12-20 mm enteral balloons. Optimal inflation time is yet to be determined. The procedure can be performed safely even in patients with peri-ampullary diverticula and surgically altered anatomy. ESLBD is effective and safe in the removal of large CBD stones, however, small sphincterotomy might be preferred and CBD strictures should be considered as a relative contraindication.

Objective: Endoscopic sphincterotomy plus large-balloon dilatation (ESLBD) has an efficacy equal to or higher than that of endoscopic sphincterotomy alone for biliary lithiasis extractions. Our purpose was to evaluate the feasibility, efficacy and morbidity of large-balloon dilatation of the sphincter of Oddi after sphincterotomy or infundibulotomy for large or multiple common bile duct stones., Material and Methods: Retrospective analysis., Results: A total of 64 ESLBD procedures were performed in 62 patients: 57 after sphincterotomy and 7 after infundibulotomy. The feasibility was 100%, and full clearance of the common bile duct was achieved in a single session without using mechanical lithotripsy in 95.3% of cases. Short-term complications were observed in 9 patients (14%). There were no perforations. The most frequent complication was delayed bleeding (7.8%). There was no significant difference of overall complications after sphincterotomy or after infundibulotomy (12.3% vs. 28.6%, p = 0.25). The incidence of acute pancreatitis was significantly higher after infundibulotomy than after sphincterotomy (28.6% vs. 0%, p = 0.01)., Conclusions: ESLBD after endoscopic sphincterotomy or infundibulotomy is a simple, reproducible and effective technique, associated with a low morbidity rate and helps in avoiding mechanical lithotripsy in 95.3% of cases for the endoscopic extraction of large or multiple common bile duct stones.