Search

Neural machine translation (NMT) systems are nowadays essential components of professional translation workflows. Consequently, human translators are increasingly working as post-editors for machine-translated content. The NWO-funded InDeep project aims to empower users of Deep Learning models of text, speech, and music by improving their ability to interact with such models and interpret their behaviors. In the specific context of translation, we aim at developing new tools and methodologies to improve prediction attribution, error analysis, and controllable generation for NMT systems. These advances will be evaluated through field studies involving professional translators to assess gains in efficiency and overall enjoyability of the post-editing process.

We present here the EU-funded project CREAMT that seeks to understand what is meant by creativity in different translation modalities, e.g. machine translation, post-editing or professional translation. Focusing on the textual elements that determine creativity in translated literary texts and the reader experience, CREAMT uses a novel, interdisciplinary approach to assess how effective MT is in literary translation considering creativity in translation and the ultimate user: the reader.

We address the task of automatically distinguishing between human-translated (HT) and machine translated (MT) texts. Following recent work, we fine-tune pre-trained language models (LMs) to perform this task. Our work differs in that we use state-of-the-art pre-trained LMs, as well as the test sets of the WMT news shared tasks as training data, to ensure the sentences were not seen during training of the MT system itself. Moreover, we analyse performance for a number of different experimental setups, such as adding translationese data, going beyond the sentence-level and normalizing punctuation. We show that (i) choosing a state-of-the-art LM can make quite a difference: our best baseline system (DeBERTa) outperforms both BERT and RoBERTa by over 3% accuracy, (ii) adding translationese data is only beneficial if there is not much data available, (iii) considerable improvements can be obtained by classifying at the document-level and (iv) normalizing punctuation and thus avoiding (some) shortcuts has no impact on model performance.

We introduce the project MaCoCu: Massive collection and curation of monolingual and bilingual data: focus on under-resourced languages, funded by the Connecting Europe Facility, which is aimed at building monolingual and parallel corpora for under-resourced European languages. The approach followed consists of crawling large amounts of textual data from selected top-level domains of the Internet, and then applying a curation and enrichment pipeline. In addition to corpora, the project will release the free/open-source web crawling and curation software used.

This paper presents the project initiated by the BiasByUs team resulting from the 2021 Artificially Correct Hackaton. We briefly explain our winning participation in the hackaton, tackling the challenge on ‘Database and detection of gender bi-as in A.I. translations’, we highlight the importance of gender bias in Machine Translation (MT), and describe our pro-posed solution to the challenge, the cur-rent status of the project, and our envi-sioned future collaborations and re-search.

This paper presents the Multitask, Multilingual, Multimodal Language Generation COST Action - Multi3Generation (CA18231), an interdisciplinary network of research groups working on different aspects of language generation. This "meta-paper" will serve as reference for citations of the Action in future publications. It presents the objectives, challenges and a the links for the achieved outcomes.

The LITHME COST Action brings together researchers from various fields of study focusing on language and technology. We present the overall goals of LITHME and the network’s working groups focusing on diverse questions related to language and technology. As an example of the work of the LITHME network, we discuss the working group on language work and language professionals. nonPeerReviewed

This project aims to study the impact of adapting neural machine translation (NMT) systems through translation exemplars, determine the optimal similarity metric(s) for retrieving informative exemplars, and, verify the usefulness of this approach for domain adaptation of NMT systems.

The WiLMa project aims to assess the effects of using machine translation (MT) tools on the writing processes of second language (L2) learners of varying proficiency. Particular attention is given to individual variation in learners’ tool use.

Comunicació presentada a 23rd Annual Conference of the European Association for Machine Translation (EAMT 2022), celebrat de l'1 al 3 de juny de 2022 a Gant, Bèlgica. The SignON project (www.signon-project.eu) focuses on the research and development of a Sign Language (SL) translation mobile application and an open communications framework. SignON rectifies the lack of technology and services for the automatic translation between signed and spoken languages, through an inclusive, humancentric solution which facilitates communication between deaf, hard of hearing (DHH) and hearing individuals. We present an overview of the current status of the project, describing the milestones reached to date and the approaches that are being developed to address the challenges and peculiarities of Sign Language Machine Translation (SLMT). SignON is a Horizon 2020 (Research and Innovation Programme Grant Agreement No. 101017255) project that runs from 2021 until the end of 2023.

The work in progress on the CEF action National Language Technology Platform is presented. The action aims at combining the most advanced language technology tools and solutions in a new state-of-the-art, artificial-intelligence- driven, national platform for language technology oriented primarily towards users from public administrations of partner states.

This study focuses on English-Dutch literary translations that were created in a professional environment using an MT-enhanced workflow consisting of a three-stage process of automatic translation followed by post-editing and (mainly) monolingual revision. We compare the three successive versions of the target texts. We used different automatic metrics to measure the (dis)similarity between the consecutive versions and analyzed the linguistic characteristics of the three translation variants. Additionally, on a subset of 200 segments, we manually annotated all errors in the machine translation output and classified the different editing actions that were carried out. The results show that more editing occurred during revision than during post-editing and that the types of editing actions were different.