Search

This cross-sectional study approached emergency department (ED) patients after the treating physician’s disposition decision to measure patient understanding of whether or not they had received an HIV test during their ED encounter. Of the 300 respondents, 24 were excluded due to missing data or because they had received an ED HIV test. Mean age was 41 years, 51% were men, 61% were black, and 29% had no high school degree. There were 5.8% (95% confidence interval: 3.5%-9.4%) who erroneously reported HIV test delivery during their ED course. Our results suggest a small but significant minority of patients falsely assume that they have been tested for HIV during their ED visit. This misperception could have broad implications, leading to less frequent subsequent testing, false reassurance of HIV-negative status, and inaccuracies in surveillance estimates or surveys that depend on self-report.

Background & Aims: Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a chronic esophageal inflammatory disorder characterized by eosinophil-rich mucosal inflammation and tissue remodeling. Prior research has revealed the upregulation of interferon (IFN) response signature genes (ISGs) in biopsy tissue from patients with EoE, but the specific cell types that contribute to this IFN response and the effect of interferons on the esophageal epithelium remain incompletely understood. Here, we use single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) to examine the expression of IFN and ISGs during EoE and explore how IFN-α and IFN-γ treatments affect epithelial function., Methods: Epithelial gene expression from patients with EoE was examined using scRNA-seq and a confirmatory bulk RNA-seq experiment of isolated epithelial cells. The functional impact of IFN-α and IFN-γ on epithelial cells was investigated using organoid models., Results: Using scRNA-seq, the highest number of differentially regulated ISGs was found in the epithelial cells of patients with active EoE, and ISGs in transitional epithelial cells correlated significantly with eosinophil counts and endoscopic reference scores. IFN-γ and IFN-α treatments reduced organoid formation rate and size in a dose-dependent manner, with IFN-γ showing a more pronounced impact on measures of epithelial barrier formation and induction of caspase activity. We identify high IFNG expression in a cluster of majority CD8+ T cells with high expression of CD69 and FOS., Conclusions: These findings reveal that interferon, especially IFN-γ, plays a central role in epithelial cell dysfunction, significantly affecting gene expression, cellular differentiation, and barrier integrity. Clarifying the contribution of varied cytokine signals in EoE may help explain the heterogeneity in patient presentation and therapeutic response., (Copyright © 2025 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The Consortium of Eosinophilic Gastrointestinal disease Researchers (CEGIR) and The International Gastrointestinal Eosinophil Researchers (TIGERs) organized a daylong symposium at the 2024 annual meeting of the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. The symposium featured new discoveries in basic and translational research as well as debates on the mechanisms and management of eosinophilic gastrointestinal diseases. Updates on recent clinical trials and consensus guidelines were also presented. We summarize the updates on eosinophilic gastrointestinal diseases presented at the symposium., Competing Interests: Disclosure statement Supported by U54AI117804 (Consortium of Eosinophilic Gastrointestinal Disease Researchers), which is part of the Rare Disease Clinical Research Network (RDCRN), an initiative of the Office of Rare Disease Research (ORDR), National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS), and is funded through collaboration between National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), National Institutes of Health (NIH)/National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK), NCATS, and in part by the Division of Intramural Research, NIAID/NIH. CEGIR is also supported by patient advocacy groups including American Partnership for Eosinophilic Disorders (APFED), Campaign Urging Research for Eosinophilic Diseases (CURED), and Eosinophilic Family Coalition (EFC). As a member of the RDCRN, CEGIR is also supported by its Data Management and Coordinating Center (DMCC) (U2CTR002818). Funding support for the DMCC is provided by the NCATS and the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS). B.L.W. was funded by NIH/NIAID (K23AI158813). E.M.A. was funded by the NIH (KL2TR002552, K12TR004410). S.S.A. was funded by NIH/NIDDK (R56AI092135). S.J.A. was funded by NIH/National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) (R01HL153170). D.A.H. was directly supported by the Hartwell Foundation, the Food Allergy Fund, and a faculty development award from the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. Allergy research in the Hill laboratory was supported by NIH/NHLBI (R01HL162715) and the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia Research Institute. J.W.C. was supported by the NIH (K23DK129784). F.L.K. was funded by APFED HOPE Pilot Grant 2023 and NIH/NIAID K23AI171085. M.A.R. was funded by the NIH (K08AI148456). L.A.S. was supported by NIH/NIAID (R01AI168134). The contents are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views or an endorsement by the NIH or other funders. None of the funding sources had a role in the design or conduct of the study. Disclosure of potential conflict of interest: B. L. Wright reports in-kind support from Regeneron in the form of study drug (dupilumab and placebo) for a clinical trial of milk oral immunotherapy. J. P. Abonia reports receipt of payment or honoraria for lectures from Takeda Global Research and Development; participation on a data safety monitoring board for OctaPharma USA; and receipt of grants or contracts from Cures Within Reach and Celgene. E. M. Abud is coinventor of patent WO/2018/160496 (microglia differentiation and use); serves as advisory board member and consulting agreements with StemPharm and Neucyte; and reports advisory board participation for Amgen and AstraZeneca. S. S. Aceves is coinventor of oral viscous budesonide, patented by the University of California, San Diego, and licensed by Takeda (oral budesonide suspension); has acted as speaker for Regeneron/Sanofi; and has received research funding from Bristol Myers Squibb. S. J. Ackerman is chief science officer and executive board member of EnteroTrack; has received patents on the Esophageal String Test (EST); has consulted for Areteia Pharmaceuticals; and has participated on the medical advisory panel of the American Partnership for Eosinophilic Disorders (APFED). M. Braskett reports acting as scientific advisor to Bryn Pharma; and receipt of royalties from UpToDate. J. W. Chang reports consulting for Regeneron/Sanofi, Takeda, and Bristol Myers Squibb. M. Chehade reports consulting for Regeneron/Sanofi, Adare/Ellodi, AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Allakos, Shire/Takeda, Phathom, and Recludix Pharma; and receipt of research funding from Regeneron, Allakos, AstraZeneca, Adare/Ellodi, Bristol Myers Squibb, Danone, and Shire/Takeda. G. M. Constantine reports speaker honoraria from PeerView CME. C. M. Davis reports research funding from NIH/NIAID, DBV, Regeneron, AstraZeneca, Takeda, and Allergenis; and educational funding from Genentech. E. S. Dellon reports research funding from Adare/Ellodi, Allakos, Arena/Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Eupraxia, Ferring, GSK, Meritage, Miraca, Nutricia, Celgene/Receptos/BMS, Regeneron, Revolo, and Shire/Takeda; consulting for Abbott, AbbVie, Adare/Ellodi, Aimmune, Akesobio, Alfasigma, ALK, Allakos, Amgen, Apollo, Aqilion, Arena/Pfizer, Aslan, AstraZeneca, Avir, Biorasi, Bryn, Calypso, Celgene/Receptos/BMS, Celldex, Eli Lilly, EsoCap, Eupraxia, Dr Falk Pharma, Ferring, GSK, Gossamer Bio, Holoclara, Invea, Knightpoint, Landos, LucidDx, Morphic, Nexstone Immunology/Uniquity, Nutricia, Parexel/Calyx, Phathom, Regeneron, Revolo, Robarts/Alimentiv, Salix, Sanofi, Shire/Takeda, Target RWE, and Upstream Bio; and receipt of educational grants from Allakos, Aqilion, Holoclara, and Invea. R. Durban reports consulting for Sanofi, AstraZeneca, Reckitt/Mead Johnson Nutrition, Abbott Nutrition, and Nutricia North America. D. A. Hill has received a patent related to the utilization of food-specific T-cell responses for the diagnosis and management of EoE. E. T. Jensen reports consulting fees from Regeneron, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, and TARGET-RWE. A. Kewalramani reports sitting on the Sanofi Mid-Atlantic Regional Respiratory Field medical advisory board. P. Khoury and A. D. Klion report royalties from UpToDate. F. L. Kuang reports research funding from AstraZeneca. E. C. McGowan reports funding from NIH/NIAID and American College of Gastroenterology; and consulting for Regeneron/Sanofi and Takeda. J. M. Spergel reports grant support from the NIH, Regeneron/Sanofi, and Novartis; and has consulted for Regeneron/Sanofi, Allakos, Readysetfood, Novartis, and Bristol Myers Squibb. A. M. Uchida reports consulting for Regeneron/Sanofi, Takeda, and AstraZeneca. J. B. Wechslerc reports consulting for Allakos, Ellodi, Regeneron/Sanofi/Genzyme, Bristol Myers Squibb, Invea Therapeutics, CellDex, and AstraZeneca; and clinical trial/research funding from Allakos and Regeneron/Sanofi. R. D. Pesek reports consulting for Regeneron. The rest of the authors declare that they have no relevant conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024 American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. All rights reserved.)

Background: Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a chronic allergic disease characterized by esophageal dysfunction, type-2 inflammation, and esophageal eosinophilic infiltrate. While proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy is commonly used for EoE management, the underlying mechanism of action remains unclear., Methods: Air-liquid interface culture of esophageal epithelial cells was employed to investigate the impact of the PPI omeprazole on barrier integrity in IL-13-treated cultures. Epithelial chemokine secretion was assessed following stimulation with IL-13 and omeprazole, and the migration of eosinophils from healthy human donors was evaluated using 3 μm pore-sized transwells. A co-culture system of epithelial cells and eosinophils was employed to study chemokine secretion and eosinophil adhesion and activation markers., Results: Omeprazole treatment in the IL-13-treated air-liquid interface (ALI) model resulted in 186 differentially expressed genes and restored barrier integrity compared to ALI treated with IL-13 alone. Omeprazole treatment reduced STAT6 phosphorylation, downregulated calpain 14, and upregulated desmoglein-1 in the IL-13-treated air-liquid interface samples. IL-13-induced upregulation of Eotaxin-3, CXCL10, and periostin, but this was downregulated by omeprazole. Further, the expression of CD11b, CD18, and CD69 was lower on eosinophils from omeprazole-treated epithelial-eosinophil co-cultures, which also had lower levels of eotaxin-3, CXCL10, CCL2, and CCL4., Conclusion: Omeprazole reduced the effects of IL-13 in both the epithelial air-liquid interface model and eosinophil-epithelial co-cultures, reducing barrier dysfunction, chemokine expression, and upregulation of eosinophil adhesion markers., Competing Interests: CONFLICTING INTERESTS The authors declare no conflict of interest in relation to this work.

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a chronic, progressive immune-mediated disease associated with antigen-driven type 2 inflammation and symptoms of esophageal dysfunction. Research over the last 2 decades has dramatically furthered our understanding of the complex interplay between genetics, environmental exposures, and cellular and molecular interactions involved in EoE. This review provides an overview of our current understanding of EoE pathogenesis., Competing Interests: Disclosure The authors have declared that no conflict of interest exists for this article., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is characterized by persistent or relapsing allergic inflammation, and both clinical and histologic features of esophageal inflammation persist over time in most individuals. Mechanisms contributing to EoE relapse are not understood, and chronic EoE-directed therapy is therefore required to prevent long-term sequelae., Objective: We investigated whether EoE patients in histologic remission have persistent dysregulation of esophageal gene expression., Methods: Esophageal biopsy samples from 51 pediatric and 52 adult subjects with EoE in histopathologic remission (<15 eosinophils per high-power field [eos/hpf]) and control (48 pediatric and 167 adult) subjects from multiple institutions were subjected to molecular profiling by the EoE diagnostic panel, which comprises a set of 94 esophageal transcripts differentially expressed in active EoE., Results: Defining remission as <15 eos/hpf, we identified 51 and 32 differentially expressed genes in pediatric and adult EoE patients compared to control individuals, respectively (false discovery rate < 0.05). Using the stringent definition of remission (0 eos/hpf), the adult and pediatric cohorts continued to have 18 and 25 differentially expressed genes (false discovery rate < 0.05). Among 6 shared genes between adults and children, CDH26 was upregulated in both children and adults; immunohistochemistry demonstrated increased cadherin 26 staining in the epithelium of EoE patients in remission compared to non-EoE controls. In the adult cohort, POSTN expression correlated with the endoscopic reference system score (Spearman r = 0.35, P = .011), specifically correlating with the rings' endoscopic reference system subscore (r = 0.53, P = .004)., Conclusion: We have identified persistent EoE-associated esophageal gene expression in patients with disease in deep remission. These data suggest potential inflammation-induced epigenetic mechanisms may influence gene expression during remission in EoE and provide insight into possible mechanisms that underlie relapse in EoE., (Copyright © 2023 American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Food protein-induced enterocolitis syndrome (FPIES) is a non-IgE mediated food allergy presenting with delayed onset of projectile vomiting in the absence of cutaneous and respiratory symptoms. The pathophysiology of FPIES remains poorly characterized. The first international consensus guidelines for FPIES were published in 2017 and provided clinicians with parameters on the diagnosis and treatment of FPIES. The guidelines have served as a resource in the recognition and management of FPIES, contributing to an increased awareness of FPIES. Since then, new evidence has emerged, shedding light on adult-onset FPIES, the different phenotypes of FPIES, the recognition of new food triggers, center-specific food challenge protocols and management of acute FPIES. Emerging evidence indicates that FPIES impacts both pediatric and adult population. As a result, there is growing need to tailor the consensus guidelines to capture diagnoses in both patient groups. Furthermore, it is crucial to provide food challenge protocols that meet the needs of both pediatric and adult FPIES patients, as well as the subset of patients with atypical FPIES. This review highlights the evolving clinical evidence relating to FPIES diagnosis and management published since the 2017 International FPIES Guidelines. We will focus on areas where recent published evidence may support evolution or revision of the guidelines., (Copyright © 2024 Japanese Society of Allergology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a chronic esophageal inflammatory disorder characterized by eosinophil-rich mucosal inflammation and tissue remodeling. Transcriptional profiling of esophageal biopsies has previously revealed upregulation of type I and II interferon (IFN) response genes. We aim to unravel interactions between immune and epithelial cells and examine functional significance in esophageal epithelial cells., Design: We investigated epithelial gene expression from EoE patients using single-cell RNA sequencing and a confirmatory bulk RNA-sequencing experiment of isolated epithelial cells. The functional impact of interferon signaling on epithelial cells was investigated using in vitro organoid models., Results: We observe upregulation of interferon response signature genes (ISGs) in the esophageal epithelium during active EoE compared to other cell types, single-cell data, and pathway analyses, identified upregulation in ISGs in epithelial cells isolated from EoE patients. Using an esophageal organoid and air-liquid interface models, we demonstrate that IFN-γ stimulation triggered disruption of esophageal epithelial differentiation, barrier integrity, and induced apoptosis via caspase upregulation. We show that an increase in cleaved caspase-3 is seen in EoE tissue and identify interferon gamma (IFNG) expression predominantly in a cluster of majority-CD8+ T cells with high expression of CD69 and FOS ., Conclusion: These findings offer insight into the interplay between immune and epithelial cells in EoE. Our data illustrate the relevance of several IFN-γ-mediated mechanisms on epithelial function in the esophagus, which have the potential to impact epithelial function during inflammatory conditions., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: The authors have declared no conflict of interests.

Background & Aims: Epithelial disruption in eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) encompasses both impaired differentiation and diminished barrier integrity. We have shown that lysyl oxidase (LOX), a collagen cross-linking enzyme, is up-regulated in the esophageal epithelium in EoE. However, the functional roles of LOX in the esophageal epithelium remains unknown., Methods: We investigated roles for LOX in the human esophageal epithelium using 3-dimensional organoid and air-liquid interface cultures stimulated with interleukin (IL)13 to recapitulate the EoE inflammatory milieu, followed by single-cell RNA sequencing, quantitative reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction, Western blot, histology, and functional analyses of barrier integrity., Results: Single-cell RNA sequencing analysis on patient-derived organoids revealed that LOX was induced by IL13 in differentiated cells. LOX-overexpressing organoids showed suppressed basal and up-regulated differentiation markers. In addition, LOX overexpression enhanced junctional protein genes and transepithelial electrical resistance. LOX overexpression restored the impaired differentiation and barrier function, including in the setting of IL13 stimulation. Transcriptome analyses on LOX-overexpressing organoids identified an enriched bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) signaling pathway compared with wild-type organoids. In particular, LOX overexpression increased BMP2 and decreased the BMP antagonist follistatin. Finally, we found that BMP2 treatment restored the balance of basal and differentiated cells., Conclusions: Our data support a model whereby LOX exhibits noncanonical roles as a signaling molecule important for epithelial homeostasis in the setting of inflammation via activation of the BMP pathway in the esophagus. The LOX/BMP axis may be integral in esophageal epithelial differentiation and a promising target for future therapies., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background & Aims: Epithelial disruption in eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) encompasses both impaired differentiation and diminished barrier integrity. We have shown that lysyl oxidase (LOX), a collagen cross-linking enzyme, is upregulated in the esophageal epithelium in EoE. However, the functional roles of LOX in the esophageal epithelium remains unknown., Methods: We investigated roles for LOX in the human esophageal epithelium using 3-dimensional organoid and air-liquid interface cultures stimulated with interleukin (IL)-13 to recapitulate the EoE inflammatory milieu, followed by single-cell RNA sequencing, quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction, western blot, histology, and functional analyses of barrier integrity., Results: Single-cell RNA sequencing analysis on patient-derived organoids revealed that LOX was induced by IL-13 in differentiated cells. LOX-overexpressing organoids demonstrated suppressed basal and upregulated differentiation markers. Additionally, LOX overexpression enhanced junctional protein genes and transepithelial electrical resistance. LOX overexpression restored the impaired differentiation and barrier function, including in the setting of IL-13 stimulation. Transcriptome analyses on LOX-overexpressing organoids identified enriched bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) signaling pathway compared to wild type organoids. Particularly, LOX overexpression increased BMP2 and decreased BMP antagonist follistatin. Finally, we found that BMP2 treatment restored the balance of basal and differentiated cells., Conclusions: Our data support a model whereby LOX exhibits non-canonical roles as a signaling molecule important for epithelial homeostasis in the setting of inflammation via activation of BMP pathway in esophagus. The LOX/BMP axis may be integral in esophageal epithelial differentiation and a promising target for future therapies., Competing Interests: Disclosures Amanda B. Muir has served on the medical advisory boards for Nexstone Immunology and Bristol Meyers Squib. The rest of the authors have declared that no conflict of interest exists.

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are widely prescribed and are indicated for the treatment of several gastrointestinal disorders. Allergists may prescribe PPIs as a result of the coincidence of gastroesophageal reflux disease with asthma or rhinitis, or when gastroesophageal reflux disease presents as chronic cough. Furthermore, long-term, high-dose PPI therapy is a recommended option for managing eosinophilic esophagitis, resulting in histologic remission in approximately 40% of patients. Here, we discuss current recommendations for PPI use, its deescalation, and its side effect profile. We review evidence supporting the epidemiologic link between the use of acid-suppressant medication and the subsequent development of allergic disorders., (Copyright © 2022 American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background & Aims: Substantial heterogeneity in terminology used for eosinophilic gastrointestinal diseases (EGIDs), particularly the catchall term "eosinophilic gastroenteritis," limits clinical and research advances. We aimed to achieve an international consensus for standardized EGID nomenclature., Methods: This consensus process utilized Delphi methodology. An initial naming framework was proposed and refined in iterative fashion, then assessed in a first round of Delphi voting. Results were discussed in 2 consensus meetings, and the framework was updated and reassessed in a second Delphi vote, with a 70% threshold set for agreement., Results: Of 91 experts participating, 85 (93%) completed the first and 82 (90%) completed the second Delphi surveys. Consensus was reached on all but 2 statements. "EGID" was the preferred umbrella term for disorders of gastrointestinal (GI) tract eosinophilic inflammation in the absence of secondary causes (100% agreement). Involved GI tract segments will be named specifically and use an "Eo" abbreviation convention: eosinophilic gastritis (now abbreviated EoG), eosinophilic enteritis (EoN), and eosinophilic colitis (EoC). The term "eosinophilic gastroenteritis" is no longer preferred as the overall name (96% agreement). When &gt;2 GI tract areas are involved, the name should reflect all of the involved areas., Conclusions: This international process resulted in consensus for updated EGID nomenclature for both clinical and research use. EGID will be the umbrella term, rather than "eosinophilic gastroenteritis," and specific naming conventions by location of GI tract involvement are recommended. As more data are developed, this framework can be updated to reflect best practices and the underlying science., (Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Rationale: Eosinophilic gastrointestinal disorders (EGID), including eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE), are inflammatory disorders of the gastrointestinal mucosa mediated by complex immune mechanisms. Although there have been initial reports of EGID in patients with inborn errors of immunity (IEI), little is known about the presentation of EGID in immunodeficient individuals., Methods: We queried the U.S. Immunodeficiency Network (USIDNET) for patient records including the terms eosinophilic esophagitis, gastritis, enteritis, or colitis. We analyzed 74 patient records from the database, including diagnoses, demographics, infectious history, laboratory findings, genetic studies, therapeutic interventions, and clinical outcomes., Results: We examined 74 patient records. A total of 61 patients had isolated EoE, and 13 had distal gastrointestinal involvement consistent with EGID. The most common IEI were common variable immunodeficiency (43.2%), some form of combined immunodeficiency (21.6%), chronic granulomatous disease (8.1%), hyper-IgE syndrome (6.8%), and autoimmune lymphoproliferative syndrome (6.8%). The median age at presentation with IEI was 0.5 years (IQR 1.725, max 39 years) and 56.76% were male. Approximately 20% of the patients in the cohort received a hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for treatment of IEI, but the timing of the HSCT in relationship to the EGID diagnosis was unknown., Conclusions: Here, we report EGID in a diverse cohort of IEI patients, suggesting that both non-EoE EGID and EoE can be seen as comorbid conditions with a variety of IEI. Our data suggests that EGID may be more common in patients with IEI than would be expected based on estimates of EGID in the general population., Competing Interests: JP receives royalties from UpToDate and her spouse is employed by Invitae, a DNA sequencing company. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2022 Tran, Gober, Garabedian, Fuleihan, Puck, Sullivan, Spergel and Ruffner.)

Introduction: The correlation between clinical and molecular treatment response thresholds in eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is not well understood., Methods: We evaluated posttreatment EoE diagnostic panel gene expression profiles across histologic and endoscopic thresholds (EREFS) in a prospective adult EoE cohort., Results: We observed a strong inverse correlation between posttreatment gene score and eosinophil count (R = -0.66; P &lt; 0.001); biopsies with &lt;15 eos/hpf had higher gene scores (≥425) vs those with ≥15 eos/hpf. Findings for EREFS were similar; EREFS ≤2 was associated with EoE diagnostic panel scores ≥395., Discussion: Molecular signatures support the use of posttreatment response thresholds &lt;15 eos/hpf and EREFS ≤2 in clinical practice and trials., (Copyright © 2022 by The American College of Gastroenterology.)

Food protein-induced enterocolitis syndrome (FPIES) is a non-IgE, cell-mediated food allergy, commonly diagnosed in infants and young children. In recent years, new-onset adult FPIES has been recognized. The underlying pathogenic mechanism of FPIES has yet to be elucidated, thus disease-specific diagnostic biomarkers have yet to be determined and an oral food challenge (OFC) remains the gold-standard for the diagnosis. Pediatric patients with FPIES classically present with symptoms of delayed, repetitive vomiting approximately 1 to 4 hours following ingestion of a food allergen. However, adults with FPIES have been reported to have a different symptom profile and different food triggers compared to the pediatric FPIES population. The current FPIES diagnostic criteria may not be appropriate for the diagnosis of adult FPIES patients, thus an oral food challenge remains a diagnostic tool. This review provides an overview of the current literature on the clinical presentation, epidemiology, diagnosis, triggers and management of adult FPIES., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2022 Anvari and Ruffner.)

Background: Dupilumab has been approved to treat atopic dermatitis, asthma, and nasal polyps and is in active clinical trials for the treatment of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). Given its shared immunopathology, we hypothesized that EoE symptoms and inflammation would improve when dupilumab therapy was used for other allergic indications., Objective: To measure the clinical and histologic response in EoE to dupilumab when treating other atopic diseases., Methods: We completed a retrospective chart review of all patients at Children's Hospital of Philadelphia and Rady Children Hospital who were prescribed dupilumab for atopic dermatitis, asthma, or nasal polyps and had a concomitant clinical diagnosis of EoE. Demographic information along with histology, symptom scores, medications, and diet information were collected. Response to dupilumab was evaluated., Results: A total of 45 patients were identified. Of which, 11 patients were prescribed dupilumab for asthma, 27 for atopic dermatitis, 3 for nasal polyps, and 4 for compassionate use for EoE. There was no follow-up data for 8 patients. Follow-up histology was available for 26 patients: 22 of 26 had less than 6 eosinophils per high power field after the initiation of dupilumab with significant improvement (pre: 52.9 + 35.1 to post: 4.5 + 10.9 eosinophils/high power field, P < .005). A total of 28 patients had improvement of symptoms, with 24 patients reporting complete resolution of symptoms after dupilumab initiation. Reductions in EoE treatment medications (swallowed steroids, proton pump inhibitors) or expansion of diet occurred in 29 patients treated with dupilumab., Conclusion: Dupilumab therapy initiated for atopic disease effectively induces symptomatic and histologic remission of esophageal disease and reduces the need for EoE-directed therapy in patients with concomitant EoE., (Copyright © 2022 American College of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background & Aims: Although basal cell hyperplasia is a histologic hallmark of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE), little is known about the capabilities of epithelial renewal and differentiation in the EoE inflammatory milieu. In murine esophageal epithelium, there are self-renewing and slowly proliferating basal stem-like cells characterized by concurrent expression of CD73 (5'-nucleotidase ecto) and CD104 (integrin β4). Here, we investigated CD73 + CD104 + cells within the basal population of human esophageal epithelium and clarified the biological significance of these cells in the EoE epithelium., Methods: We performed flow cytometry on esophageal biopsy samples from EoE and non-EoE patients to determine the quantity of CD73 + CD104 + cells in the epithelium. Simulating the EoE milieu we stimulated primary patient-derived and immortalized cell line-derived esophageal organoids with interleukin (IL)4 and IL13 and analyzed by flow cytometry, immunohistochemistry, and quantitative reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction. We performed single-cell RNA sequencing on primary organoids in the setting of IL13 stimulation and evaluated the CD73 + CD104 + population. We performed fluorescent-activated cell sorting to purify CD73 + CD104 + and CD73 - CD104 + populations and seeded these groups in organoid culture to evaluate the organoid formation rate and organoid size. We used RNA interference to knock down CD73 in esophageal organoids to evaluate organoid formation rates and size. We evaluated the effects of signal transducer and activator of transcription 6 (STAT6) signaling inhibition by RNA interference, a STAT6 inhibitor, AS1517499, as well as the proton pump inhibitor omeprazole., Results: EoE patients showed decreased epithelial CD73 + CD104 + cell content. IL4 and IL13 stimulation depleted this population in 3-dimensional organoids with a recapitulation of basal cell hyperplasia as corroborated by single-cell RNA sequencing of the organoids, which suggests depletion of CD73 + CD104 + cells. The CD73 + CD104 + population had enhanced organoid formation compared with the CD73 - CD104 + population. Similarly, knock-down of CD73 resulted in decreased organoid formation rate. Genetic and pharmacologic inhibition of STAT6 prevented T helper 2 cytokine-induced depletion of CD73 + CD104 + cells. Lastly, omeprazole treatment prevented the effects of IL4 and IL13 on the CD73 + CD104 + population., Conclusions: This study addressed the role of CD73 + CD104 + cells in epithelial renewal and homeostasis in the context of EoE. The depletion of the CD73 + CD104 + self-renewal population by helper T cell 2 cytokines in EoE milieu may be perpetuating epithelial injury. Future therapies targeting epithelial restitution in EoE could decrease the need for immune modulation and steroid therapy., (Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Eosinophilic esophagitis is an immune-mediated allergic disease of the esophagus that affects pediatric patients of all ages. The diagnosis is made by esophagogastroduodenoscopy demonstrating eosinophilic infiltrate of the esophagus. Approaches to treatment involve proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), swallowed topical steroid preparations, as well as dietary elimination. In this review we discuss the evidence and efficacy of each of these approaches., Competing Interests: Disclosure The authors have no commercial or financial conflicts of interest and no funding sources to acknowledge in regard to this article., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: There are no disease-modifying therapies for the treatment of eosinophilic oesophagitis (EoE), which is driven by non-IgE-mediated allergic inflammation. A recent clinical trial of milk epicutaneous immunotherapy (EPIT) has shown initial promise, with 47% of treated EoE patients tolerating milk without recurrence of disease. Mechanisms of EPIT in EoE have not been studied in humans. Here, we identify transcriptional changes in the peripheral CD4 + T-cell compartment during active EoE and following EPIT., Methods: RNA isolation, sequencing and integrative data analysis were performed on peripheral CD4 + T cells isolated from 15 of 20 patients enrolled in a clinical trial of EPIT for EoE. Gene expression changes in peripheral CD4 + T cells were examined during diet therapy and following trial of milk antigen EPIT., Results: We identify 244 differentially expressed genes in peripheral blood CD4 + cells of EoE patients consuming versus those eliminating milk, and 129 DEGs in CD4 + cells were isolated after EPIT versus after placebo (FDR ≤ 0.05). Gene set enrichment analysis identifies enrichment of hallmark interferon-α and interferon-γ response pathways in peripheral CD4 + T cells from EoE patients during active disease on a milk-containing diet. We demonstrate overlap of this gene signature with the altered gene expression signature seen in EoE patient biopsy tissue. EPIT therapy response is associated with significant enrichment in pathways related to T-cell receptor signalling ( P  = 1.16 × 10 -14 ), antigen presentation and costimulation, and cytokine signalling ( P  = 1.11 × 10 -16 ), as well as upregulation of genes associated with regulatory T-cell function., Conclusions: EoE is associated with distinct global transcriptional changes in CD4 + T cells, one feature of which is an IFN response signature. Clinically favorable response to EPIT is likely multifactorial but is associated with a distinct transcriptional profile in peripheral CD4 + cells supporting the hypothesis that EPIT alters peripheral CD4 + responses in EoE patients., Competing Interests: Drs Spergel and Cianferoni have consulting agreements and clinical trial grants with DBV Technologies. Dr Spergel has stock equity with DBV Technologies. DBV Technologies provided the Viaskin Patch used in the SMILEE clinical trial and had no role in the collection, analysis or interpretation of the data presented in the current study. The remaining authors declare no competing financial interests or relationships pertinent to the work reported in this paper., (© 2021 The Authors. Clinical & Translational Immunology published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Australian and New Zealand Society for Immunology, Inc.)

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is an allergic inflammatory disease of the esophagus that occurs in both children and adults. Previous studies of affected tissue from pediatric cohorts have identified prominent signatures of eosinophilia and type 2 inflammation. However, the details of the immune response in adults with EoE are still being elucidated. To determine whether EoE in adults shares inflammatory profiles with those observed in children, we performed RNA sequencing of paired human esophageal biopsies and blood samples from adults with EoE or gastroesophageal reflux disease. Unbiased analysis of differentially expressed genes in tissue revealed a strong IFN signature that was significantly enriched in EoE patients as compared with patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease. Both type I and type II IFN-responsive genes were upregulated in adult biopsies, but not in blood. A similar increase in expression of IFN gene sets was observed in pediatric EoE biopsies as compared with non-EoE samples, and in public pediatric and adult RNA-sequencing data. Finally, we found that human peripheral CD4 + T cells from children with EoE produce IFN-γ upon activation with EoE-causal allergens. Together, this work identifies a conserved IFN signature in pediatric and adult EoE, highlighting a role for non-type 2 inflammatory networks in the disease process in humans., (Copyright © 2021 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc.)

Background: Food protein-induced enterocolitis syndrome (FPIES) is a non-IgE-mediated food allergy. Its relationship to the major atopic manifestations (atopic dermatitis [AD], IgE-mediated food allergy [IgE-FA], allergic rhinitis [AR], asthma) is not understood., Objective: To determine the clinical characteristics, epidemiologic features, and natural history of FPIES in relation to the major atopic manifestations., Methods: We examined our primary care birth cohort of 158,510 pediatric patients, of whom 214 patients met 2017 FPIES diagnostic criteria. We measured the influence of FPIES on developing subsequent atopic disease., Results: Pediatric FPIES incidence was between 0.17% and 0.42% depending on birth year. As in prior reports, most patients had an acute presentation (78%), and milk, soy, oat, rice, potato, and egg were common triggers. The mean age of diagnosis was 6.8 months. Atopic comorbidity was higher in patients with FPIES compared with healthy children (AD, 20.6% vs 11.7%; IgE-FA, 23.8% vs 4.0%; asthma, 26.6% vs 18.4%; AR, 28.0% vs 16.7%; P < .001 χ 2 ). However, longitudinal analyses indicated that prior FPIES did not influence the rate of atopy development., Conclusions: The incidence of FPIES in our cohort was initially low, but is increasing. Food allergen distribution, presentation, and age of onset are similar to prior reports. Patients with FPIES have high rates of atopic comorbidity. However, longitudinal analysis does not support direct causation as the etiology of these associations. Rather it suggests a shared predisposition to both types of allergy, or associative bias effects. This work refines our understanding of the natural history of FPIES by elucidating associations between FPIES and atopy., (Copyright © 2019 American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To improve understanding of the heterogeneous presentation of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE), and its different potential phenotypes and endotypes., Data Sources: We reviewed studies addressing EoE genetics, risks, natural history, treatment, phenotype, or endotype to assess data relating to differences in the presentation of EoE in children and adults. This review was restricted to articles in the English language., Study Selections: Data source abstracts, pertinent articles, and book chapters meeting the objectives were critically reviewed., Results: Data to support differing phenotypes and endotypes in EoE are emerging, but findings are based on multiple studies and therefore sometimes incomparable. Like other atopic disorders EoE is a complex disease with diverse clinical presentations (phenotypes) based on response to therapy, natural history, and association with atopic comorbidities. Different pathogenetic mechanisms (endotypes) may drive the multiple phenotypes. T Helper type 2 inflammation, epithelial barrier defects, enhanced fibrosis, and association with rare monogenetic diseases are the most described endotypes in EoE., Conclusion: Eosinophilic esophagitis is an atopic disorder that is increasing in prevalence and can be difficult to treat. Better understanding of phenotypes and endotypes in EoE may enable future care to be individualized more effectively, resulting in shorter time to remission and fewer endoscopies., (Copyright © 2019 American College of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose of Review: The purpose of this review is to provide a brief discussion on the differential diagnosis for peripheral eosinophilia. We will then focus on targeted immunotherapies for atopic disease, their effects on absolute peripheral eosinophil counts, and use of peripheral eosinophils as a predictor of treatment response., Recent Findings: In atopic disease, lower absolute peripheral eosinophil counts are typically associated with improved outcomes. Much of the current evidence on eosinophils as a biomarker comes from post hoc analyses in therapeutic immunotherapy. While changes in eosinophilia were not the primary outcome of interest in many studies, some patterns did emerge. Cytolytic monoclonal antibodies AK002 and benralizumab completely reduce peripheral and tissue eosinophil numbers. Dupilumab may have paradoxical transient eosinophilia despite observed clinical efficacy. Atopic inflammation is complex largely due to the various cytokines which affect eosinophil activation, proliferation, differentiation, and survival. This demonstrates the challenges of using peripheral eosinophilia alone as a biomarker for atopic disease activity. More attention should spotlight how different immunotherapy modalities affect eosinophil-driven responses.

Background: Germline-encoded innate immune pattern recognition receptors (PRR) are expressed at epithelial surfaces and modulate epithelial defenses. Evidence suggests that stimulation of the Toll-like receptor (TLR) family of PRR may regulate epithelial barrier integrity by upregulating tight junction (TJ) complex protein expression, but it is not known whether this mechanism is utilized in esophageal epithelial cells. TJ complex proteins maintain intact barrier function and are dysregulated in atopic disorders including eosinophilic esophagitis., Methods: Pattern recognition receptors expression was assessed in EoE and control primary esophageal epithelial cells, demonstrating robust expression of TLR2 and TLR3. The three-dimensional air-liquid interface culture (ALI) model was used to test whether TLR2 or TLR3 stimulation alters epithelial barrier function using an in vitro model of human epithelium. Transepithelial electrical resistance (TEER) and FITC-Dextran permeability were evaluated to assess membrane permeability. ALI cultures were evaluated by histology, immunohistochemistry, Western blotting, and chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP)., Results: TLR3 stimulation did not change TEER in the ALI model. TLR2 stimulation increased TEER (1.28- to 1.31-fold) and decreased paracellular permeability to FITC-Dextran, and this effect was abolished by treatment with anti-TLR2 blocking antibody. TJ complex proteins claudin-1 and zonula occludens-1 were upregulated following TLR2 stimulation, and ChIP assay demonstrated altered histone 4 acetyl binding at the TJP1 enhancer and CLDN1 enhancer and promoter following zymosan treatment, implying the occurrence of durable chromatin changes., Conclusions: Our findings implicate the TLR2 pathway as a potential regulator of esophageal epithelial barrier function and suggest that downstream chromatin modifications are associated with this effect., (© 2019 EAACI and John Wiley and Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd.)

Background: Food protein-induced enterocolitis syndrome (FPIES) is a non-IgE-mediated food allergy that is diagnosed based on clinical findings, but can be confirmed with oral food challenge (OFC). OFC is more often performed to assess the development of tolerance. Most studies describing OFCs in FPIES are limited in size., Objective: We sought to describe our experience with OFCs using our FPIES protocol. Patients were given one-third of serving size with a 4-hour observation period, followed by home titration to full dose., Methods: We conducted a retrospective chart review of patients who underwent OFC via the FPIES protocol from 2014 to 2017. Data regarding the history of reaction, age at the time of challenge, and reactions during challenge or with home introduction were collected., Results: A total of 169 OFCs were completed under the FPIES protocol, in 119 patients to 19 different foods. Thirty challenges (18%) were positive, with 17 challenges (10%) during initial challenge and 13 (7.7%) during home dosing. Most reactions during initial challenge required intravenous fluids (IVF), but hypotension was uncommon. One hundred thirty-nine (82%) OFCs were negative with home introduction, indicating tolerance to the challenged foods. The mean age of passing a challenge to milk, soy, and grain was earlier than that of other solid foods., Conclusions: Our data suggest that our FPIES OFC protocol is safe. Early administration of IVF may prevent the development of hypotension. It is difficult to stratify the risk of severe or delayed reaction based on patient characteristics, and more data are needed to identify those appropriate for home introduction., (Copyright © 2018 American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Diagnostic and therapeutic strategies in eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) are evolving. New knowledge regarding the pathophysiology of EoE has been the foundation for updated diagnostic recommendations and new therapeutic trials. Areas covered: We performed structured literature searches in Medline and PubMed, Cochrane meta-analyses, and abstracts of international congresses to review therapeutic approaches for EoE in July 2018. Additional articles were obtained by perusing the references of articles identified in the original PubMed search. Articles were excluded if they did not focus on the mechanism of disease, diagnosis, or treatment of humans with EoE. Expert commentary: Recent advances in the understanding of mechanisms underlying the pathology of EoE have resulted in significant change in the diagnostic algorithm for EoE, and are identifying promising potential targets for personalized medicine. There is a clinical need for improved targeted therapy for EoE, and better understanding the underlying pathophysiology of EoE will help to determine therapeutic targets. In this review, we highlight key mechanisms in the pathophysiology of EoE and how they are being utilized to change therapy in EoE.

Purpose of Review: Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a multifactorial, non-IgE-mediated inflammatory disorder of the esophagus and is the most common cause of food impaction in the pediatric population. The purpose of this review is to describe the current recommendations for diagnosis and management of EoE., Recent Findings: New data has associated EoE with other allergic disorders of the atopic march as well as several risk factors, which predispose to allergic conditions. A subset of patients with esophageal eosinophilia respond to proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy with a partial or complete resolution of esophageal eosinophilia. Therefore, some patients can be treated with PPI alone. If this is unsuccessful, dietary elimination and swallowed steroid therapy are recommended for long-term management. There is a growing appreciation that untreated esophageal inflammation can lead to complications of fibrosis and stricture formation., Summary: The current review will focus on the diagnosis and management of EoE in the pediatric population. Identification and diagnosis of pediatric patients with EoE is critical to prevent long-term esophageal complications.

Background: Pediatric asthma is a major contributor to emergency room utilization and hospital readmission rates., Objective: To develop an allergy department‒based intervention to improve follow-up appointment scheduling processes for pediatric asthma patients after discharge for asthma exacerbation., Methods: This quality improvement study was conducted in the allergy clinic of an urban, tertiary children's hospital. Children receiving subspecialty allergy care for asthma were included into the intervention group during the intervention period. The quality improvement intervention consisted of 3 attempts by telephone to reach the family to schedule the follow-up appointment. If this was unsuccessful or if the appointment was not kept, then a reminder letter was sent to the family. The primary outcome of interest in this study was the percent of postdischarge follow-up appointments scheduled within 30 days of discharge. Secondary outcomes measured were the percent of allergy appointments attended within 30 days of discharge and the 30-day hospital readmission rate., Results: Demographics did not differ significantly between the intervention and baseline preintervention year. The initial baseline scheduled allergy follow-up visit rate was 48.8 ± 13.3% of patients discharged per month. This increased to an overall rate of 75.7 ± 20.1% patients scheduling allergy follow-up within 30 days of discharge during the intervention year. We also observed a significant increase in attended allergy visits 30 days postdischarge from 35.5 ± 15.6% in year 1 to 53.9 ± 25.5% during the intervention year and a significant decrease in the 30-day readmission rate on the allergy service., Conclusion: These data suggests that minor changes in allergy practice organization can significantly affect posthospitalization follow-up rates and decrease asthma readmission rates., (Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background: Eosinophilic esophagitis is a chronic, immune-mediated disease characterized by symptoms of esophageal dysfunction and ≥15 eosinophils/high-powered field (eos/hpf). Proton pump inhibitor responsive esophageal eosinophilia (1) is an entity of esophageal eosinophilia that responds to PPI therapy and is thought to be clinically and histologically similar to EoE. Current guidelines suggest therapy with PPI prior to endoscopy and use of PPI as first line for esophageal eosinophilia. In order to gain a better understanding of community practice patterns and to try differentiate between these two entities, we sought to evaluate the clinical presentations, treatment and final diagnoses of patients presenting to our institution for second opinions of esophageal eosinophilia. Methods: A search of our electronic medical record yielded a list of patients presenting for a second opinion of esophageal eosinophilia. Charts were reviewed for clinical information. Results: A total of 187 charts were included. Patients ranged from 1-19 years old with 75% being male and 74% being Caucasian. Of the patients who had documentation of their medications at the time of initial endoscopy, 70% were not on any PPI prior to their endoscopy, and 94% were on <2 mg/kg/day. Of the 19 patients who had full response to PPI therapy and were diagnosed with PPI-REE, close to half had previously been treated with diet, steroids, or both. Patients with final diagnosis of EoE had significantly higher eos/hpf on initial endoscopy compared to those with diagnosis of PPI-REE (51.9 ± 30.6 v. 35.8 ± 16.4. p = 0.027), as well as higher likelihood of having IgE-mediated food allergy (79 v. 47%, p = 0.003). Conclusions: Diagnostic and therapeutic algorithms are needed for esophageal eosinophilia to prevent misdiagnosis and unnecessary procedures and therapies.

Purpose: The point prevalence of underweight status and obesity in primary immunodeficiency disease (PID) is unknown, despite the described associations between PID and weight loss and failure to thrive. The goal of this study is to estimate the prevalence of underweight status and obesity in PID patients and to investigate the associations between abnormal body weight and complications of PID., Methods: Using the US Immunodeficiency Network (USIDNET), we performed a retrospective analysis of 653 pediatric (age 2 to 20 years) and 514 adult (age > 20) patient records with information on patient body mass index (BMI). Prevalence of underweight and obese status in PID patients was compared to data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES)., Results: After separating BMI data by year of entry to the database, we demonstrated that both adult and pediatric patients with PID had significantly higher prevalence of underweight patients in multiple years of analysis. Further examination of underweight patients by PID diagnosis revealed that underweight status in adults with CVID was associated with granulomatous disease as well as earlier age of CVID diagnosis. In the pediatric CVID cohort, underweight status was significantly associated with lymphopenia. Examination of obesity in pediatric and adult PID patients compared to NHANES database revealed only a single year when obesity in PID patients was significantly less prevalent. In other 2-year time intervals from 2005 to 2014, the prevalence of obesity was unchanged in children and adults., Conclusions: These results quantify the prevalence of underweight status in PID in a North American population and demonstrate that whether as a result of weight loss or poor weight gain, underweight status is more prevalent in the PID population than in the general US population. The prevalence of obesity in PID patients was similar to that seen in the general population. This highlights the need for continued education on the association of low weight and PID., Clinical Trial Registration: NCT01953016.

Background: Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is an allergic inflammatory disease that is triggered by food allergens and characterized by progressive esophageal dysfunction. Esophageal biopsy specimens are characterized by eosinophilia and expression of T H 2 cytokines., Objective: To ascertain whether T H 2 cells can exist in the peripheral blood in patients with milk-induced EoE., Methods: Peripheral blood mononuclear cells from 20 children with milk-induced EoE were collected during active EoE (EoE-A) while consuming milk and inactive EoE (EoE-I) while not consuming milk, and 8 healthy patients without EoE were used as controls. The samples were analyzed for T-cell phenotype, including intracellular cytokines before and after incubation with milk antigens and assessed by flow cytometry., Results: We found a significant increase in CD4 + T H 2 cells in the peripheral blood of patients with EoE-A compared with the controls. Furthermore, we observed a significant mean (SD) increase in the activation marker of CD154 + T cells (0.17% [0.047 %] ) in patients with EoE-A compared with control patients (0.034% [0.007%]) and EoE-I (0.025% [0.008]). These CD4 + T cells expressed significantly increase levels of T H 2 cytokines (interleukins 4, 5, and 13) compared with the EoE-I and control groups. CD3 + CD4 + CD154 + IL-5 + cells were significantly increased by milk antigens in both milk-induced EoE-A (0.050% [0.008%] to 0.079% [0.017%]) and EoE-I (0.0045% [0.002%] to 0.014% [0.008%]) compared with the controls (0.008% [0.003%] to 0.003% [0.001%])., Conclusion: Our findings indicate that in EoE peripheral T cells have specific activation to milk allergens., (Copyright © 2017 American College of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose of Review: EoE is a significant cause of gastrointestinal morbidity affecting 1:2000. Patients with EoE typically have multiple atopic comorbidities, and additionally, many patients with EoE can be controlled well with elimination diets. The purpose of this review is to summarize the care of pediatric eosinophilic esophagitis patients., Recent Findings: EoE represents a distinct clinical syndrome which is characterized by esophageal dysfunction and eosinophil-predominant inflammation of the esophageal mucosa. Patients with EoE can present with varying symptoms depending on their age; in this review, we review the presenting features of eosinophilic esophagitis in children as well as a diagnostic algorithm for EoE. The mucosal inflammation in EoE is driven by exposure to food antigens in many patients with EoE. Therefore, for the majority of patients, the mainstays of treatment remain food elimination diets or swallowed steroids. This review summarizes the diagnostic approach to eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) in pediatric patients, focusing on the importance of accurate diagnosis and selection of appropriate therapy.

Viral infections are commonplace and often innocuous. Nevertheless, within the population of patients with primary immunodeficiencies (PIDDs), viral infections can be the feature that drives a diagnostic evaluation or can be the most significant morbidity for the patient. This review is focused on the viral complications of PIDDs. It will focus on respiratory viruses, the most common type of viral infection in the general population. Children and adults with an increased frequency or severity of respiratory viral infections are often referred for an immunologic evaluation. The classic teaching is to investigate humoral function in people with recurrent sinopulmonary infections, but this is often interpreted to mean recurrent bacterial infections. Recurrent or very severe viral infections may also be a harbinger of a primary immunodeficiency as well. This review will also cover persistent cutaneous viral infections, systemic infections, central nervous system infections, and gastrointestinal infections. In each case, the specific viral infections may drive a diagnostic evaluation that is specific for that type of virus. This review also discusses the management of these infections, which can become problematic in patients with PIDDs.

Competing Interests: none

Recent advances in the understanding of immune dysregulation in autoimmune diseases have enabled the development of new monoclonal antibody-based drugs called biologics. Biologics have been used to target aberrant immune responses in many diseases, but patients with rheumatologic and other autoimmune diseases have benefited the most and improvements in outcomes have been significant. The use of biologics is not without hazard, however, as these agents block immune pathways adapted to protect the host. This has been borne out by increased rates of infections as well as induction of new autoimmune and hematologic adverse effects. As new drugs for the treatment of autoimmune conditions are entering the pipeline, it is incumbent on the practicing immunologist to understand the mechanism of these biologics and the implications of clinical use.

Background: Food protein-induced enterocolitis (FPIES) is a rare non-IgE mediated disease. Most studies have been limited in nature, with the largest cohort being 66 patients. The most common foods that have been reported are milk and soy., Objective: A retrospective chart review of patients seen in the Allergy Section at The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia with International Classification of Diseases Ninth Revision code of 558.3 (Allergic Gastroenteritis and Colitis) between 2007 and 2012 was conducted to identify patients with suspected FPIES. Diagnosis of FPIES was confirmed based on meeting clinical criteria of delayed reaction with pronounced vomiting and/or diarrhea. Data regarding patient characteristics and features of their reactions were collected for analysis and comparison with existing studies., Results: A total of 462 cases were identified in our chart review. Patients had a similar demographic profile to the normal allergy patients seen in our clinic. The most common foods identified were milk (67%), soy (41%), rice (19%), oat (16%), and egg (11%). Patients had onset of FPIES to milk and soy around 7 months of age compared with 12 months of age for solid foods. FPIES reactions were identified to meats, tree nuts, peanuts, fruits, and vegetables; 70% of the patients reacted to one or two foods. Skin prick testing and atopy patch testing were not helpful in identifying the foods., Conclusion: FPIES reactions were seen more frequently than previously described. However, the presentation and clinical features were similar to previous reports. Milk- and soy-triggered FPIES were common, and 43.5% of patients who had a milk trigger reacted to soy. There is no laboratory test to identify foods that cause FPIES, and clinician-supervised oral food challenge is the only definitive test available., (Copyright © 2013 American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Tumor-specific immunosuppression is frequently observed in tumor-bearing hosts. Exosomes are nano-sized, endosomal-derived membrane vesicles secreted by most tumor and hematopoietic cells and have been shown to actively participate in immune regulation. We previously demonstrated that antigen-specific immunosuppressive exosomes could be isolated from the blood plasma of antigen-immunized mice. Here, we demonstrate that plasma-derived exosomes isolated from mice bearing OVA-expressing tumors were able to suppress OVA-specific immune responses in a mouse delayed-type hypersensitivity model. Enrichment of tumor-derived exosomes in the plasma of mice bearing subcutaneous melanoma was not detected using an exosome-tagging approach. Instead, depletion of MHC class II(+) vesicles from plasma-derived exosomes or using plasma-derived exosomes isolated from MHC class II-deficient mice resulted in significant abrogation of the suppressive effect. These results demonstrate that circulating host-derived, MHC class II(+) exosomes in tumor-bearing hosts are able to suppress the immune response specific to tumor antigens., (© 2012 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim.)

Background: We and others have previously demonstrated that treatment with bone marrow derived DC genetically modified to express IL-4 reduce disease pathology in mouse models of collagen-induced arthritis and delayed-type hypersensitivity. Moreover, treatment of normoglycemic NOD mice with bone marrow derived DC, genetically modified to express interleukin 4 (IL-4), reduces the onset of hyperglycemia in a significant number of animals. However, the mechanism(s) through which DC expressing IL-4 function to prevent autoimmune diabetes and whether this treatment can reverse disease in pre-diabetic NOD mice are unknown., Methodology/principal Findings: DC were generated from the bone marrow of NOD mice and transduced with adenoviral vectors encoding soluble murine IL-4 (DC/sIL-4), a membrane-bound IL-4 construct, or empty vector control. Female NOD mice were segregated into normoglycemic (<150 mg/dL) and prediabetic groups (between 150 and 250 mg/dL) on the basis of blood glucose measurements, and randomized for adoptive transfer of 10(6) DC via a single i.v. injection. A single injection of DC/sIL-4, when administered to normoglycemic 12-week old NOD mice, significantly reduced the number of mice that developed diabetes. Furthermore, DC/sIL-4, but not control DC, decreased the number of mice progressing to diabetes when given to prediabetic NOD mice 12-16 weeks of age. DC/sIL-4 treatment also significantly reduced islet mononuclear infiltration and increased the expression of FoxP3 in the pancreatic lymph nodes of a subset of treated animals. Furthermore, DC/sIL-4 treatment altered the antigen-specific Th2:Th1 cytokine profiles as determined by ELISPOT of splenocytes in treated animals., Conclusions: Adoptive transfer of DC transduced to express IL-4 into both normoglycemic and prediabetic NOD mice is an effective treatment for T1D.