Search

Background: For many people with Parkinson's disease (PWPD), the long-term maintenance of speech following intensive treatment remains elusive. PD Check-In, a model for supported self-managed maintenance of speech following LSVT LOUD®, was developed and evaluated. Aims: To evaluate the impact of PD Check-In on vocal intensity and level of satisfaction of PWPD and their communication partners (CPs) over 24 months following LSVT LOUD. Methods & Procedures: A repeated-measures study design examined the impact of PD Check-In on the speech of 16 PWPD. Participants received LSVT LOUD followed by PD Check-In at 6 and 12 weeks, and 6, 12 and 24 months after treatment. Outcome measures included acoustic measures of vocal intensity (sound pressure level--SPL) during sustained phonation, functional phrases, reading, and monologue, and satisfaction questionnaires for PWPD and their CPs. Outcomes & Results: A significant treatment effect for time (p < 0.01) was identified for all SPL variables. Planned comparisons showed significant improvements for each variable pre- to post-LSVT LOUD. There was a significant maintenance effect for SPL maximum sustained phonation only, post-LSVT LOUD to 24 months. SPL remained significantly above baseline for functional phrases and maximum sustained phonation at 24 months. Participants' satisfaction with PD Check-In was high, at 93.75% for PWPD and 79.99% for CPs, at 24 months post-treatment. Long intervals between appointments led PWPD to feel less motivated about speech practice but more confident in self-management. Conclusions & Implications: For PWPD and CPs, maintenance of speech following LSVT LOUD encompasses more than acoustic outcomes.

Background: Debilitating speech and communication changes in Parkinson's disease (PD) lead to diminished quality of life for people with PD and their communication partners. Maintenance of the long-term effects of treatment such as LSVT LOUD® remains equivocal. Development of supported long-term maintenance programs is warranted. Aims: This article describes the development and preliminary outcome data for PD Check-In, a supported self-management intervention for the maintenance of speech and social communication for people with PD following LSVT LOUD. Methods & Procedures: A narrative literature review of the principles of self-management and social cognitive theory of self-regulation was conducted to develop the core elements of PD Check-In. PD Check-In was conducted in person by a speech and language therapist (SLT) for three participants at 6 and 12 weeks, and at 6, 12 and 24 months following LSVT LOUD. Outcome measures included vocal intensity (SPL) during monologue and the dysarthria impact profile (DIP). PD Check-In utilized semi-structured discussion to develop, evaluate, and support the self-efficacy and skill of the person with PD in maintaining speech and social communication. Outcomes & Results: Six conceptual elements of PD Check-In were identified in the development phase--partnerships, self-reflection, maintenance issues, revision, goal-setting and maintenance strategies. Preliminary intervention data revealed monologue vocal intensity at 24 months post-LSVT LOUD was maintained above pre-treatment level, but below levels achieved post-treatment. The psychosocial impact of speech changes from pre-LSVT LOUD to 24 months post-treatment as measured by the DIP was variable. Qualitative statements reflected participant experiences underlying the clinical data. Conclusions & Implications: The theoretical and practical underpinnings of PD Check-In were defined. The impact of PD Check-In on three persons with PD was variable but positive. Further evaluation of the model is warranted.

Dysphagia (impaired swallowing) is known to contribute to decreased quality of life, and increased length of hospital stay and mortality post-stroke. Despite the advancements in stroke treatment with the introduction of thrombolysis and endovascular clot retrieval (ECR), patients continue to present with high rates of dysphagia. Speech and language therapists and stroke teams should consider the presence of haemorrhagic transformation, success of reperfusion and presence of communication deficits as risk factors for dysphagia post-ECR and/or thrombolysis. Purpose: To establish incidence rates and patterns of dysphagia following the administration of reperfusion therapies in acute ischaemic stroke management. Method: A retrospective review of 193 patients admitted with acute ischaemic stroke to a quaternary stroke unit in Australia over a three year period was completed. Clinical information extracted included demographics, type (thrombolysis and/or endovascular clot retrieval) and success of reperfusion therapy, and the progression of dysphagia and related factors. Results: Over half of all patients treated with reperfusion therapies presented with dysphagia on initial assessment by speech-language pathology (SLP). The type of reperfusion therapy administered was not significantly correlated with the presence of dysphagia. Dysphagia on initial assessment was significantly correlated with the presence of aphasia on initial assessment, the presence of haemorrhagic transformation, and the success of reperfusion. Increased rates of enteral feeding were also found in this study compared to figures reported in literature. Conclusion: This study identified ongoing high rates of dysphagia amongst this patient population regardless of treatment type, demonstrating the need for ongoing SLP management post stroke. Further research is required in this area to develop an evidence-base for SLPs and the wider medical team and to inform clinical practice guidelines.

Background: Maintenance of speech outcomes following speech‐language therapy (SLT) in Parkinson's disease (PD) is an unmet expectation of people with PD (PWPD) and poorly defined in SLT practice. PD Check‐In, a model for supported self‐managed maintenance of speech following Lee Silverman Voice Treatment (LSVT) LOUD was investigated. Aims: To investigate the impact of the semi‐structured component of PD Check‐In on the adoption of self‐management concepts and behaviours and the identification of facilitators, barriers and strategies for speech maintenance by PWPD over 24 months post‐treatment. Methods and procedure: Following LSVT LOUD, 16 PWPD participated in individual PD Check‐In semi‐structured discussions with a SLT at 6 and 12 weeks, and 6, 12 and 24 months post treatment. A two‐stage qualitative content analysis was applied: directed content analysis using categories from the theoretical framework of PD Check‐In followed by inductive content analysis to identify subcategories. Outcomes and results: Statements from PWPD indicated adoption of seven concepts of self‐management across participants and across time. Six concepts from the theoretical framework of PD Check‐In (partnerships, self‐reflection, maintenance barriers and facilitators, revision of LSVT LOUD skill, goal setting and maintenance strategies), and one new category, participation, emerged from the analysis. Self‐reflection, maintenance facilitators and barriers and participation were most prevalent in discussions. PWPD identified facilitators, barriers and strategies for maintenance across time points. Conclusions and implications: Statements from PWPD indicated a positive impact of SLT‐supported self‐management of speech using self‐tailored strategies for sustainable maintenance according to their individual circumstances and needs. WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS: What is already known on this subject: People with Parkinson's disease (PWPD) have expressed their need for speech‐language therapy (SLT) services that are accessible for the duration of the condition and responsive to their expectation of maintaining speech following treatment. Outcomes for maintenance of the treatment effect following Lee Silverman Voice Treatment (LSVT) LOUD are variable. What this paper adds to existing knowledge: This study presents the outcomes of five PD Check‐In interventions delivered in semi‐structured discussions between PWPD and a SLT over 24 months following LSVT LOUD for the development of self‐management skills and behaviours. PWPD adopted self‐management positively using self‐tailored strategies for sustainable maintenance according to their individual circumstances and needs. What are the potential or actual clinical implications of this work?: PWPD responded positively to the individual development of self‐management skills and behaviours over time. Individuality and flexible responsivity are features of PD Check‐In which resonate with PWPD and speak to SLT supported self‐managed maintenance of speech as a long‐term model for PD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Endovascular clot retrieval (ECR) is known to reduce global disability at 3 months post stroke however limited research exists regarding the trajectory of specific clinical impairments including language, swallowing and cognitive deficits between onset and 3 months. Aims: To assess language, swallowing, and cognitive performance following ECR and explore whether impairment severity is correlated with modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction score (mTICI), stroke severity or quality of life (QoL). Methods: Assessment was completed within 7 days (T1), 1 month (T2) and 3 months (T3) post‐stroke. Performance was measured with the Functional Oral Intake Scale (FOIS), Repeatable Battery for Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS), Trail Making Test (TMT A and B) and Brixton Spatial Awareness Test. The Western Aphasia Battery (WAB) was used for left hemisphere stroke. QoL was measured with the Stroke and Aphasia Quality of Life Scale. Results: Twenty‐five participants (median 72 years; 64% male) were prospectively recruited following ECR. High reperfusion success (68% mTICI 3) and low stroke severity post ECR (median 24 h NIHSS = 3, IQR 7–18) were noted. At T1, 10 participants presented with aphasia, eight required a modified diet and 20 had impaired cognition. At T3 all had recovered to a normal oral diet, 39% had persistent cognitive impairment and 45% of patients with left hemisphere stroke remained aphasic. Performance on the WAB, FOIS, RBANS and TMT changed significantly over time (all p < 0.05). The severity score at T1 for all measures, excluding TMT B and Brixton, was significantly correlated with 24 h NIHSS. WAB scores at T3 were correlated with QoL (r = 0.618; p = 0.043). Conclusion: This exploratory study found the longitudinal performance of language, swallowing and cognition significantly improved over time and severity in the first‐week post‐ECR was correlated with 24 h NIHSS rather than the degree of reperfusion. WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS: What is already known on the subject: Randomised control trials have demonstrated the benefit of ECR in patients with ischemic stroke using global measures of disability and function. Limited research exists regarding the trajectory of specific clinical impairments including language, swallowing and cognitive deficits. There is also a reliance on screening assessments and a lack of consideration of the influence of co‐occurring impairments. What this paper adds to existing knowledge: This prospective study is amongst the first to explore the longitudinal trajectory of language, swallowing and cognitive impairment using a standardised assessment battery. Twenty‐four‐hour NIHSS was significantly correlated with language, swallowing, global cognition and some measures of executive function. Language performance post ECR was correlated with domain‐specific cognitive assessment of attention, immediate memory and delayed memory, which differed from swallowing performance post ECR that correlated with measures of executive function. What are the potential or actual clinical implications of this work?: It is important for speech‐language pathologists and the wider medical team to monitor language, swallowing and cognitive performance post ECR regardless of treatment success. Stroke severity at 24 h post‐ECR influences the severity of language, swallowing and cognitive impairments. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Whilst dysphagia is a commonly reported complication of stroke, it has received relatively little attention in the literature for patients following non-traumatic subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH). Aims: To investigate dysphagia incidence, risk factors, clinical progression and recovery in patients following non-traumatic SAH. Methods & Procedures: A prospective cohort study of 49 patients admitted to a tertiary neurosurgical referral unit with non-traumatic SAH over a 12-month period was conducted. Swallowing function was assessed by a speech-language pathologist within 72 h of medical stability and monitored throughout the acute inpatient admission. Outcomes & Results: Dysphagia incidence was 16.33% (n = 8/49). Risk factors associated with dysphagia included; Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score on admission, need for intensive care unit (ICU) admission, length of ICU stay, need for intubation and ventilation, and hydrocephalus. Participants with dysphagia were admitted to hospital 1.9 times longer than those without dysphagia (p < 0.05) and were more likely to be transferred to another inpatient facility for ongoing care (p < 0.05). Dysphagia remained present at hospital discharge for over half (62.5%) of participants who developed this complication. Conclusions & Implications: Care pathways for patients admitted to hospital with non-traumatic SAH should include early screening for dysphagia risk. Further research using a larger prospective cohort is required to validate dysphagia incidence and risk factors in this patient cohort.

Individuals with non-traumatic subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH) are often excluded from studies of stroke populations due to differing pathophysiology and treatment pathways. Thus, aphasia presentation in the non-traumatic SAH population is potentially under-represented within existing research evidence. Five databases were systematically searched with terms related to "aphasia" and "subarachnoid haemorrhage." Studies were included if aphasia was attributed to non-traumatic SAH or its associated complications, and where at least one language assessment measure used determined the presence or absence of aphasia. Study quality was evaluated using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT). Following deduplication, 2726 articles were identified for title and abstract screening. Full text screening for 162 articles occurred, with 18 articles selected for inclusion. Aphasia incidence ranged from 5 to 24%, and was influenced by assessment measure, timing of assessment, subgroup studied, and classifications of aphasia. Many studies excluded participants with poorer clinical outcome, intracerebral complications, or severe aphasia. Few studies used comprehensive language assessment measures to examine across language domains. Aphasia presentation is highly heterogenous following non-traumatic SAH. Future research using comprehensive language assessments at multiple time points post onset is required to better understand aphasia presentation and management needs for this population. Aphasia screening and/or assessment should be routinely performed for all individuals following non-traumatic subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH). Comprehensive assessment across all language domains is required to ascertain the nature and extent of aphasia. Co-occurring cognitive deficits are likely in the SAH population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: For many people with Parkinson's disease (PWPD), the long‐term maintenance of speech following intensive treatment remains elusive. PD Check‐In, a model for supported self‐managed maintenance of speech following LSVT LOUD®, was developed and evaluated. Aims: To evaluate the impact of PD Check‐In on vocal intensity and level of satisfaction of PWPD and their communication partners (CPs) over 24 months following LSVT LOUD. Methods & Procedures: A repeated‐measures study design examined the impact of PD Check‐In on the speech of 16 PWPD. Participants received LSVT LOUD followed by PD Check‐In at 6 and 12 weeks, and 6, 12 and 24 months after treatment. Outcome measures included acoustic measures of vocal intensity (sound pressure level–SPL) during sustained phonation, functional phrases, reading, and monologue, and satisfaction questionnaires for PWPD and their CPs. Outcomes & Results: A significant treatment effect for time (p < 0.01) was identified for all SPL variables. Planned comparisons showed significant improvements for each variable pre‐ to post‐LSVT LOUD. There was a significant maintenance effect for SPL maximum sustained phonation only, post‐LSVT LOUD to 24 months. SPL remained significantly above baseline for functional phrases and maximum sustained phonation at 24 months. Participants' satisfaction with PD Check‐In was high, at 93.75% for PWPD and 79.99% for CPs, at 24 months post‐treatment. Long intervals between appointments led PWPD to feel less motivated about speech practice but more confident in self‐management. Conclusions & Implications: For PWPD and CPs, maintenance of speech following LSVT LOUD encompasses more than acoustic outcomes. WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS: What is already known on this subject?: Maintenance of speech following LSVT LOUD has been shown to be variable in individual and group models. For PWPD and their CPs, a model for speech maintenance supports their expectation of sustained treatment effect over time and meets their changing needs for speech and language therapy services. Supported self‐management is a model under investigation for long‐term maintenance of speech. What this paper adds to existing knowledge?: This study presents the impact of five individual PD Check‐In interventions on the maintenance of vocal intensity (SPL) of 16 PWPD over 24 months following LSVT LOUD. PWPD and CPs reported a high level of satisfaction with PD Check‐In independent of acoustic outcomes. What are the potential or actual clinical implications of this work?: Participant satisfaction with PD Check‐In is derived from multiple factors and not limited to acoustic outcomes post‐LSVT LOUD. Further investigation of the efficacy of PD Check‐In to support the perceived maintenance of speech of PWPD and CPs is warranted. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Oropharyngeal dysphagia is common post-stroke and can have serious consequences for patients. Understanding dysphagia recovery is critically important to inform prognostication and support patients and professionals with care planning. This systematic review was undertaken to identify clinical predictors of dysphagia recovery post-stroke. Online databases (EMBASE, Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed, CINAHL, and Cochrane) were searched for studies reporting longitudinal swallowing recovery in adults post-stroke. Dysphagia recovery was defined as improvement measured on a clinical swallowing scale or upgrade in oral and/or enteral feeding status by the end of the follow-up period. The search strategy returned 6598 studies from which 87 studies went through full-text screening, and 19 studies were included that met the eligibility criteria. Age, airway compromise identified on instrumental assessment, dysphagia severity, bilateral lesions, and stroke severity were identified as predictors of persistent dysphagia and negative recovery in multiple logistic regression analysis. The available literature was predominated by retrospective data, and comparison of outcomes was limited by methodological differences across the studies in terms of the choice of assessment, measure of recovery, and period of follow-up. Future prospective research is warranted with increased representation of haemorrhagic strokes and uniform use of standardized scales of swallowing function. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Although dysphagia is a potential negative consequence of thermal burn injury, particularly if there is burn injury to the head and neck region, dysphagia management and the role of speech-language [...]

Dysphagia (impaired swallowing) is known to contribute to decreased quality of life, and increased length of hospital stay and mortality post‐stroke. Despite the advancements in stroke treatment with the introduction of thrombolysis and endovascular clot retrieval (ECR), patients continue to present with high rates of dysphagia. Speech and language therapists and stroke teams should consider the presence of haemorrhagic transformation, success of reperfusion and presence of communication deficits as risk factors for dysphagia post‐ECR and/or thrombolysis. Purpose: To establish incidence rates and patterns of dysphagia following the administration of reperfusion therapies in acute ischaemic stroke management. Method: A retrospective review of 193 patients admitted with acute ischaemic stroke to a quaternary stroke unit in Australia over a three year period was completed. Clinical information extracted included demographics, type (thrombolysis and/or endovascular clot retrieval) and success of reperfusion therapy, and the progression of dysphagia and related factors. Results: Over half of all patients treated with reperfusion therapies presented with dysphagia on initial assessment by speech‐language pathology (SLP). The type of reperfusion therapy administered was not significantly correlated with the presence of dysphagia. Dysphagia on initial assessment was significantly correlated with the presence of aphasia on initial assessment, the presence of haemorrhagic transformation, and the success of reperfusion. Increased rates of enteral feeding were also found in this study compared to figures reported in literature. Conclusion: This study identified ongoing high rates of dysphagia amongst this patient population regardless of treatment type, demonstrating the need for ongoing SLP management post stroke. Further research is required in this area to develop an evidence‐base for SLPs and the wider medical team and to inform clinical practice guidelines. What this paper adds: What is already known on the subject: Stroke is one of the leading causes of disability and death internationally. Dysphagia (impaired swallowing), a common sequalae of stroke, is known to contribute to decreased quality of life, increased length of hospital stay and mortality. With advancements in technology, treatments for acute ischaemic stroke (endovascular clot retrieval and thrombolysis) are increasing in popularity. However, limited research exists exploring the impact of these therapies on dysphagia. What this paper adds: Despite the advancements in stroke treatment, patients continue to present with high rates of dysphagia. Dysphagia following thrombolysis and/or ECR was found to be significantly correlated to the presence of aphasia, haemorrhagic transformation, and the success of reperfusion (regardless of treatment type). Additionally, increased rates of enteral feeding were found amongst this patient population compared to figures reported in the literature for patients following traditional stroke management. Clinical implications of this study: Speech‐language pathologists and the wider medical team should consider dysphagia as an ongoing consequence of stroke following reperfusion therapies, with consideration for success of reperfusion and adverse outcomes i.e., haemorrhagic transformation. Further research is required to provide an evidence‐base and specific guidelines for the management of dysphagia post reperfusion therapies, including use of enteral feeding. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Debilitating speech and communication changes in Parkinson's disease (PD) lead to diminished quality of life for people with PD and their communication partners. Maintenance of the long‐term effects of treatment such as LSVT LOUD® remains equivocal. Development of supported long‐term maintenance programs is warranted. Aims: This article describes the development and preliminary outcome data for PD Check‐In, a supported self‐management intervention for the maintenance of speech and social communication for people with PD following LSVT LOUD. Methods & Procedures: A narrative literature review of the principles of self‐management and social cognitive theory of self‐regulation was conducted to develop the core elements of PD Check‐In. PD Check‐In was conducted in person by a speech and language therapist (SLT) for three participants at 6 and 12 weeks, and at 6, 12 and 24 months following LSVT LOUD. Outcome measures included vocal intensity (SPL) during monologue and the dysarthria impact profile (DIP). PD Check‐In utilized semi‐structured discussion to develop, evaluate, and support the self‐efficacy and skill of the person with PD in maintaining speech and social communication. Outcomes & Results: Six conceptual elements of PD Check‐In were identified in the development phase: partnerships, self‐reflection, maintenance issues, revision, goal‐setting and maintenance strategies. Preliminary intervention data revealed monologue vocal intensity at 24 months post‐LSVT LOUD was maintained above pre‐treatment level, but below levels achieved post‐treatment. The psychosocial impact of speech changes from pre‐LSVT LOUD to 24 months post‐treatment as measured by the DIP was variable. Qualitative statements reflected participant experiences underlying the clinical data. Conclusions & Implications: The theoretical and practical underpinnings of PD Check‐In were defined. The impact of PD Check‐In on three persons with PD was variable but positive. Further evaluation of the model is warranted. What this paper adds: What is already known on the subject: LSVT LOUD provides efficacious treatment for the speech disorder associated with PD. Long‐term maintenance of speech post‐treatment varies following self‐managed and group therapy interventions. People with PD have an unmet expectation of long‐term maintenance of speech and improved quality of life following intensive treatment. What this paper adds to existing knowledge: This study describes the development of a novel clinic‐based approach to long‐term maintenance of speech in PD based on the principles of self‐management and self‐efficacy. It provides preliminary data to demonstrate the method and its effects on three participants with varying speech difficulty, self‐management skill development and psychosocial impact. What are the potential or actual clinical implications of this work?: The positive impact of PD Check‐In on the maintenance of monologue vocal intensity above baseline 24 months post‐intensive treatment was independent of the variable impact on the quality of life of the participants. Further exploration of PD Check‐In is warranted to determine the efficacy of this approach. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]