Search

Study design: Prospective cohort study. Introduction: Management of the severe thoracolumbar (TL) spine fracture-dislocation injuries have been further complicated by the COVID-19 pandemic. The need to optimize resources and minimize the personnel in the operating room (OR) led us to develop a novel technique to reduce TL fracture-dislocations (AO type-C) using an orthopedic distractor device (ODD). Methods: This prospective study was conducted at a tertiary care spine center with a study duration from March 2020 to May 2020 coinciding with the nationwide lockdown and travel restrictions imposed in view of the COVID-19 crisis. Only patients with AO type C fracture-dislocation managed using the ODD operated by a single surgeon were included in the study. Results: Of 12 cases, the most commonly affected level was D12-L1. Nine patients were American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale (AIS) A at presentation, two patients were AIS B, and one AIS C. The mean operative time was 125 min and mean blood loss was 454 ml. Eight patients remained AIS A, one patient improved from AIS B to C. Two patients became independent walkers, one remained AIS B. The post-operative VAS score improved to a mean value of 2.33. The improvement in kyphosis was 26.24° immediate postoperatively and maintained at 25.9°, percentage height loss reduced to 2.75% immediate postoperatively and maintained at 3.16% at 3 months follow-up. Conclusions: Management of TL fracture-dislocations in COVID times of health care resource scarcity can be challenging. Single surgeon with ODD is a useful technique for achieving good results in these injuries. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Byline: Vishwajeet. Singh, Tarush. Rustagi, Rajat. Mahajan, Mrinalini. Priyadarshini, Kalidutta. Das Ligamentum flavum cysts (LFC) are uncommon and their differentiation from other Juxta-facetal cysts & epidural cystic lesions is difficult [...]

Study Design: Retrospective study. Purpose: To study the outcomes of two-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (2L-ACDF) versus hybrid total disc replacement (H-TDR) for cervical myeloradiculopathy. Overview of Literature: For bilevel disc issues of the cervical spine, 2L-ACDF has been a historical tool with numerous implants used at different time frames. Recent developments in total disc replacement at mobile level with fusion at a spondylotic level known as hybrid fixation have added a new armamentarium for such disorders. Methods: An analysis of 49 consecutive patients who underwent 2L-ACDF (n=22) and H-TDR (n=27) from January 1, 2014 to December 31, 2017 was performed. Data were studied as retrieved from InstaPACS ver. 4.0 (Mediff Technologies Pvt. Ltd., Bengaluru, India) and medical records. Results: Twenty-two patients with 2L-ACDF and 27 patients with H-TDR were included. The mean±standard deviation (SD) follow-up duration was 4.0±1.5 years in H-TDR and 3.1±1.1 years in 2L-ACDF. The mean±SD Neck Disability Index (NDI) decreased from 26.1±7.6 to 6.5±3.9 in the H-TDR group and from 27.6±7.2 to 6.4±4.8 in the 2L-ACDF group at final follow-up. Disc height at suprajacent level in the 2L-ACDF group was 4.12±0.48 mm, 4.10±0.45 mm, and 4.05±0.48 mm preoperatively, at 1-year, and final follow-up, respectively. Disc height at supradjacent level in the H-TDR group was 4.28±0.36 mm, 4.20±0.32 mm, and 4.19±0.34 mm preoperatively, at 1-year, and final follow-up, respectively. Conclusions: There was significantly improved NDI in both groups. Adjacent segment disc height loss was greater in the 2L-ACDF group than in H-TDR but not statistically significant (p =0.304). Supradjacent segment range of motion was greater in the 2L-ACDF group than in the H-TDR group (p =0.003). Both findings supported radiographic adjacent segment degeneration (ASD), but symptomatic ASD was absent in both groups. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Narrative review. To provide a narrative review for diagnosis and management of Primary spine tumors. A detailed review of literature was done to identify relevant and well cited manuscripts to construct this narrative review. Primary tumors of the spine are rare with some racial differences reported. There are numerous adjuvant technologies and developments that influence the way we currently manage these tumors. Collimated radiation allows for heavy dosage to be delivered and have been reported to give good local control both as an adjuvant and neoadjuvant setting. These have made surgical decision making even more intricate needing a multicentric approach. Dedicated care has been shown to significantly improve health quality of life measures and survival. While, it is beyond the scope of this paper to discuss all primary tumors subtypes individually, this review highlights the developments and approach to primary spine tumors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Observational Study The primary objective was to determine if there were differences in spine structure measures between experimental postures and standard supine posture MRIs. Thirty-four low back pain patients were included. MRI was taken in 6 experimental postures. The dependent measures includes sagittal view anterior (ADH), middle and posterior disc heights, thecal sac width, left/right foraminal height (FH). In the axial view: disc width, left and right foraminal height. Measures were done L3/L4, L4/L5 and L5/S1. Each subject served as their own control. Spine measurements in the experimental posture were compared to the same measures in the standard supine posture. 94% inter-observer reliability was seen. In the sagittal and axial view, 55 of the 108 and 11 of the 18 measures were significantly different. In sagittal view: a) ADH was significantly smaller in the sitting flexed posture by 2.50 mm ± 0.63 compared to the supine posture; b) ADH in sitting neutral posture was significantly smaller than the standard posture by 1.97 mm ± 0.86; c) sitting flexed posture showed that bilateral FH measures were significantly different; d) Bilateral FH was larger in the sitting neutral posture compared to the standard supine posture by 0.87 mm ± 0.17. This research quantifies the differences in spine structure measures that occur in various experimental postures. The additional information gathered from an upright MRI may correlate with symptoms leading to an accurate diagnosis and assist in future spine research. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]