Search

Purpose: To determine patient-reported clinical status in a cohort of patients operated on during adolescence for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) using Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation after a minimum follow-up (FU) of 25 years., Methods: Multicentric cross-sectional observational study. We assessed the clinical status of patients using the lumbar-pain numeric rating scale (NRS), ODI, SRS-22r, SF-36, and EQ-5D-5L. For NRS and SRS-22r, the reported "Patient Acceptable Symptom State" (PASS +) was used as a reference for normality. Further, normative data were used for SF-36 and EQ-5D-5L., Results: Out of 226 eligible patients, 152 (67% of the total; 87% female) were included (mean FU = 29.6 years). The mean age at FU was 45.1 years (SD3.4; range 36-55). The PASS + status was achieved by 56.7% of patients on the SRS-22 subtotal score, 56% of patients in the NRS and 56.8% in the ODI questionnaire achieving PASS + state. Significant differences were found between the normative values for the SF-36 and EQ-5D-5L scores, but the magnitude of the differences was not clinically relevant. Clinically significant differences were found for SF-36 bodily pain (43.0 vs. 50.0; p < 0.001), SF-36 PCS (42.8 vs. 50.0; p = 0.0001) and EQ-5D-5L pain score, with the scoliotic population having 4.1 times more risk of severe/extreme pain than their peers., Conclusions: Thirty years after surgery, AIS patients have more pain and worse physical functioning than their peers. However, the differences are not clinically relevant except for pain and physical activity. Further, on average, the former are in good clinical condition, although surgery has not normalized their lives., Competing Interests: Declarations. Conflict of interest: A. Matamalas is consultant from Orthofix; S. Haddad is consultant from Medtronic; F. Pellisé recieved research funds paid to institution from Medtronic, DePuySpine Synthes, Nuvasive, Orthofix, SpineArt, is consultant from Medtronic and Nuvasive and is a member of AOSpine Deformity Knowledge Forum Steering Committee, SRS Secretary and Governance Council Chair and the editorial board of European Spine Journal, Spine Deformity Journal. The other authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest. Ethical approval: All procedures performed in this study were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. The project was approved by the institutional ethical committee on 01/03/2019 (project number PR.ATR 83/2019). Informed consent: Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants involved in the study., (© 2025. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Scoliosis Research Society.)

Background: Advancements in non-ionizing methods for quantifying spinal deformities are crucial for assessing and monitoring scoliosis. In this study, we analyzed the observer variability of a newly developed digital tool for quantifying body asymmetry from clinical photographs. Methods: Prospective observational multicenter study. Initially, a digital tool was developed using image analysis software, calculating quantitative measures of body asymmetry. This tool was integrated into an online platform that exports data to a database. The tool calculated 10 parameters, including angles (shoulder height, axilla height, waist height, right and left waistline angles, and their difference) and surfaces of the left and right hemitrunks (shoulders, waists, pelvises, and total). Subsequently, an online training course on the tool was conducted for twelve observers not involved in its development (six research coordinators and six spine surgeons). Finally, 15 standardized back photographs of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients were selected from a multicenter image bank, representing various clinical scenarios (different age, gender, curve type, BMI, and pre- and postoperative images). The 12 observers measured the photographs at two different times with a three-week interval. For the second round, the images were randomly mixed. Inter- and intra-observer variabilities of the measurements were analyzed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs), and reliability was measured by the standard error of measurement (SEM). Group comparisons were made using Student's t -test. Results: The mean inter-observer ICC for the ten measurements was 0.981, the mean intra-observer ICC was 0.937, and SEM was 0.3-1.3°. The parameter with the strongest inter- and intra-observer validity was the difference in waistline angles 0.994 and 0.974, respectively, while the highest variability was found with the waist height angle 0.963 and 0.845, respectively. No test-retest differences ( p > 0.05) were observed between researchers (0.948 ± 0.04) and surgeons (0.925 ± 0.05). Conclusion: We developed a new digital tool integrated into an online platform demonstrating excellent reliability and inter- and intra-observer variabilities for quantifying body asymmetry in scoliosis patients from a simple clinical photograph. The method could be used for assessing and monitoring scoliosis and body asymmetry without radiation.

Study Design/setting: Retrospective cohort study., Objective: Assess the extent to which defined risk factors of adverse events are drivers of cost-utility in spinal deformity (ASD) surgery., Methods: ASD patients with 2-year (2Y) data were included. Tertiles were used to define high degrees of frailty, sagittal deformity, blood loss, and surgical time. Cost was calculated using the Pearl Diver registry and cost-utility at 2Y was compared between cohorts based on the number of risk factors present. Statistically significant differences in cost-utility by number of baseline risk factors were determined using ANOVA, followed by a generalized linear model, adjusting for clinical site and surgeon, to assess the effects of increasing risk score on overall cost-utility., Results: By 2 years, 31% experienced a major complication and 23% underwent reoperation. Patients with ≤2 risk factors had significantly less major complications. Patients with 2 risk factors improved the most from baseline to 2Y in ODI. Average cost increased by $8234 per risk factor (R 2 = .981). Cost-per-QALY at 2Y increased by $122,650 per risk factor (R 2 = .794). Adjusted generalized linear model demonstrated a significant trend between increasing risk score and increasing cost-utility (r 2 = .408, P < .001)., Conclusions: The number of defined patient-specific and surgical risk factors, especially those with greater than two, were associated with increased index surgical costs and diminished cost-utility. Efforts to optimize patient physiology and minimize surgical risk would likely reduce healthcare expenditures and improve the overall cost-utility profile for ASD interventions. Level of evidence: III., Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: Peter Gust Passias, MDAllosource: Other financial or material support Cervical Scoliosis Research Society: Research support Globus Medical: Paid presenter or speaker Medtronic: Paid consultant Royal Biologics: Paid consultant Spine: Editorial or governing board SpineWave: Paid consultant Terumo: Paid consultant Zimmer: Paid presenter or speaker. Virginie Lafage, PhD DePuy, A Johnson & Johnson Company: Paid presenter or speaker European Spine Journal: Editorial or governing board Globus Medical: Paid consultant International Spine Study Group: Board or committee member Nuvasive: IP royalties Scoliosis Research Society: Board or committee member The Permanente Medical Group: Paid presenter or speaker. Ferran Pellise, MDAOSpine Deformity Knowledge Forum: Board or committee member DePuy, A Johnson & Johnson Company: Research support European Spine Journal: Editorial or governing board EuroSpine, The Spine Society of Europe: Board or committee member Medtronic: Paid consultant; Research support Scoliosis Research Society: Board or committee member Spanish Spine Society, GEER: Board or committee member Stryker: Paid consultant. Renaud Lafage, MS Nemaris: Stock or stock Options. Munish C Gupta, MD. AO Spine Faculty, travel: Board or committee memberDePuy, A Johnson & Johnson Company: IP royalties; Paid consultant; Paid presenter or speaker European Spine Journal-Advisory Board: Editorial or governing board Global Spine Journal-Reviewer: Editorial or governing board Globus Medical: IP royalties; Paid consultant honorarium for faculty: Board or committee member Innomed: IP royalties Johnson & Johnson: Stock or stock Options Medtronic: Paid consultant Spine Deformity, Reviewer: Editorial or governing board SRS-Board of Directors: Board or committee member SRS-IMAST & Education committee: Board or committee member travel: Board or committee member Wolters Kluwer Health - Lippincott Williams & Wilkins: Publishing royalties, financial or material support. Michael Patrick Kelly, MD, MSc, AO Spine: Board or committee memberCervical Spine Research Society: Board or committee member Scoliosis Research Society: Board or committee member Spine: Editorial or governing board. Han Jo Kim, MDAAOS: Board or committee member Alphatec Spine: Paid consultant AO SPINE: Board or committee member Cervical Spine Research Society: Board or committee member HSS Journal, Asian Spine Journal: Editorial or governing board ISSGF: Research support K2M: IP royalties Scoliosis Research Society: Board or committee member Zimmer: IP royalties. Khaled M Kebaish, MDDePuy, A Johnson & Johnson Company: IP royalties; Paid consultant; Paid presenter or speaker; Research support Orthofix, Inc.: IP royalties; Paid consultant Orthofix, Inc., K2 medical Inc: Paid presenter or speaker Scoliosis Research Society: Board or committee member Stryker: IP royalties. Alan H Daniels, MDEOS: Paid consultant Medicrea: Paid consultant Medtronic Sofamor Danek: Paid consultant Novabone: Paid consultant Orthofix, Inc.: Paid consultant; Research support Southern Spine: IP royalties Spineart: IP royalties; Paid consultant Springer: Publishing royalties, financial or material support Stryker: Paid consultant. Andrew J Schoenfeld, MDAAOS: Board or committee member Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - American: Editorial or governing board North American Spine Society: Board or committee member Spine: Editorial or governing board Springer: Publishing royalties, financial or material support Wolters Kluwer Health - Lippincott Williams & Wilkins: Publishing royalties, financial or material support. Jeffrey Gum, MDAcuity: IP royalties; Paid consultant Alan L. & Jacqueline B. Stuart Spine Research: Research support Cerapedics: Research support Cingulate Therapeutics: Stock or stock Options DePuy, A Johnson & Johnson Company: Paid presenter or speaker Global Spine Journal - Reviewer: Editorial or governing board Intellirod Spine Inc.: Research support K2M /Stryker: Board or committee member MAZOR Surgical Technologies: Paid consultant Medtronic: Board or committee member; Paid consultant; Research support Norton Healthcare: Research support Nuvasive: IP royalties; Paid consultant Pfizer: Research support Scoliosis Research Society: Research support Spine Deformity - Reviewer: Editorial or governing board Stryker: Paid consultant; Paid presenter or speaker Texas Scottish Rite Hospital: Research support The Spine Journal - Reviewer: Editorial or governing board. Themistocles Stavros Protopsaltis, MDAltus: IP royalties Globus Medical: Paid consultant Medicrea: Paid consultant Medtronic: Paid consultant Nuvasive: Paid consultant Spine Align: Stock or stock Options Stryker: Paid consultant Torus Medical: Stock or stock Options. Ibrahim ObeidAlphatec Spine: IP royalties; Paid consultant Clariance: IP royalties DePuy, A Johnson & Johnson Company: Paid consultant; Paid presenter or speaker; Research support Medtronic Sofamor Danek: Paid consultant; Paid presenter or speaker SPINEART: IP royalties. Gregory Michael Mundis Jr, MDCarlsmed: Paid consultant ISSGF: Research support K2M: IP royalties Nuvasive: IP royalties; Paid consultant; Research support Scoliosis Research Society: Board or committee member SeaSpine: Paid consultant Stryker: Paid consultant Viseon: Paid consultant. Dean Chou, MDGlobus Medical: IP royalties; Paid consultant Orthofix, Inc.: Paid consultant. Ahmet Alanay, MDDePuy, A Johnson & Johnson Company: Research support European Spine Journal: Editorial or governing board Globus Medical: Paid consultant Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - American: Editorial or governing board Medtronic: Research support Scoliosis Research Society: Board or committee member ZimVie: IP royalties; Paid consultant. Eric O Klineberg, MDAO Spine: Paid presenter or speaker; Research support DePuy, A Johnson & Johnson Company: Paid consultant Medicrea: Paid consultant Medtronic: Paid consultant Stryker: Paid consultant. Breton G Line, BSISSGF: Paid consultant. Robert A Hart, MD, FAAOSAmerican Orthopaedic Association: Board or committee member Cervical Spine Research Society: Board or committee member DePuy, A Johnson & Johnson Company: IP royalties; Paid consultant; Paid presenter or speaker Globus Medical: IP royalties; Paid consultant; Paid presenter or speaker International Spine Study Group: Board or committee member ISSLS Textbook of the Lumbar Spine: Editorial or governing board Medtronic: Paid consultant; Paid presenter or speaker North American Spine Society: Board or committee member Orthofix, Inc.: Paid consultant; Paid presenter or speaker Scoliosis Research Society: Board or committee member SeaSpine: IP royalties Spine Connect: Stock or stock Options Western Ortho Assn: Board or committee member. Douglas C Burton, MD, FAAOSBioventus: Research support DePuy, A Johnson & Johnson Company: IP royalties; Paid consultant; Research support Pfizer: Research support Progenerative Medical: Stock or stock Options Scoliosis Research Society: Board or committee member Spine Deformity: Editorial or governing board. Frank J Schwab, MDDePuy, A Johnson & Johnson Company: Research support Globus Medical: Paid consultant; Paid presenter or speaker K2M: IP royalties; Paid consultant; Paid presenter or speaker Medicrea: Paid consultant Medtronic: Paid consultant Medtronic Sofamor Danek: IP royalties; Paid presenter or speaker Nuvasive: Research support Scoliosis Research Society: Board or committee member spine deformity: Editorial or governing board Stryker: Research support VP of International Spine Society Group (ISSG): Board or committee member Zimmer: IP royalties; Paid consultant; Paid presenter or speaker. Christopher I Shaffrey, MDAANS: Board or committee member Cervical Spine Research Society: Board or committee member DePuy, A Johnson & Johnson Company: Paid presenter or speaker; Research support Globus Medical: Research support Medtronic: Other financial or material support; Paid consultant Medtronic Sofamor Danek: IP royalties; Paid presenter or speaker; Research support Neurosurgery RRC: Board or committee member Nuvasive: IP royalties; Paid consultant; Paid presenter or speaker; Research support; Stock or stock Options Proprio: Paid consultant Scoliosis Research Society: Board or committee member SI Bone: IP royalties Spinal Deformity: Editorial or governing board Spine: Editorial or governing board. Robert Shay Bess, MDallosource: Paid consultant; Research support Biomet: Research support DePuy, A Johnson & Johnson Company: Paid consultant; Research support EOS: Research support Globus Medical: Research support k2 medical: IP royalties; Paid consultant; Paid presenter or speaker; Research support Medtronic Sofamor Danek: Research support North American Spine Society: Board or committee member Nuvasive: IP royalties; Research support Orthofix, Inc.: Research support Scoliosis Research Society: Board or committee member Stryker: IP royalties; Paid presenter or speaker. Christopher Ames, MD Biomet Spine: IP royalties DePuy, A Johnson & Johnson Company: IP royalties; Paid consultant; Research support Global Spine Analytics - Director: Other financial or material support International Spine Study Group (ISSG): Research support International Spine Study Group (ISSG) - Executive Committee: Other financial or material support K2M: IP royalties; Paid consultant Medicrea: IP royalties; Paid consultant Medtronic: Paid consultant Next Orthosurgical: IP royalties Nuvasive: IP royalties Operative Neurosurgery - Editorial Board: Other financial or material support Scoliosis Research Society (SRS) - Grant Funding: Other financial or material support Stryker: IP royalties Titan Spine: Research support. Justin S Smith, MDAlphatec Spine: Stock or stock Options Carlsmed: Paid consultant Cerapedics: Paid consultant DePuy: Research support DePuy, A Johnson & Johnson Company: Paid consultant Journal of Neurosurgery Spine: Editorial or governing board Neurosurgery: Editorial or governing board Nuvasive: IP royalties; Paid consultant; Research support Operative Neurosurgery: Editorial or governing board Scoliosis Research Society: Board or committee member Spine Deformity: Editorial or governing board Stryker: Paid consultant Thieme: Publishing royalties, financial or material support Zimmer: IP royalties; Paid consultant.

Introduction: The Global Alignment and Proportion (GAP) score incorporates three domains directly modified with surgery (relative pelvic version-RPV, relative lumbar lordosis-RLL, lumbar distribution index-LDI) and one indirectly restored (relative spinopelvic alignment-RSA). We analyzed our surgical realignment performance and the consequences of domain-specific realignment failure on mechanical complications and PROMs., Materials and Methods: From an adult spinal deformity prospective multicenter database, we selected patients: fused to pelvis, upper instrumented vertebra at or above L1, and 2 years of follow-up. Descriptive, univariate and multivariate analyses were employed., Results: The sample included 333 patients. RLL-6w showed the highest success rate (58.3% aligned), but 16.5% of patients were classified in the "Severe hypolordosis" and "Hyperlordosis" subgroups. RPV-6w was the most challenging to realign, with 51.6% moderate or severe retroversion. Regarding RSA-6w, 21.9% had severe positive malalignment. Correct alignment of RPV-6w (p = 0.025) and RSA-6w (p = 0.002) proved to be protective factors against the development of mechanical complications. Severe pelvic retroversion (p = 0.026) and severe positive malalignment (p = 0.007) were risk factors for mechanical complications. RSA-6w "Severe positive malalignment" was associated with less improvement in PROMs: ∆ODI (8.83 vs 17.2; p = 0.011), ∆SRS-22 total (0.54 vs 0.87; p = 0.007), and ∆SF-36PCS (3.47 vs 7.76; p = 0.04); MCID for ODI (37.0 vs 55.5%; p = 0.023), and SRS-22 (40.8 vs 60.1%; p = 0.015); and PASS for ODI (17.6 vs 31.7%; p = 0.047)., Conclusions: RPV was the most underperformed modifiable parameter. Severe pelvic retroversion and severe positive malalignment influenced the occurrence of mechanical complications. Severe positive malalignment affected PROMs improvement., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Purpose: Sagittal malalignment is a risk factor for mechanical complications after surgery for adult spinal deformity (ASD). Spinal loads, modulated by sagittal alignment, may explain this relationship. The aims of this study were to investigate the relationships between: (1) postoperative changes in loads at the proximal segment and realignment, and (2) absolute postoperative loads and postoperative alignment measures., Methods: A previously validated musculoskeletal model of the whole spine was applied to study a clinical sample of 205 patients with ASD. Based on clinical and radiographic data, pre-and postoperative patient-specific alignments were simulated to predict loads at the proximal segment adjacent to the spinal fusion., Results: Weak-to-moderate associations were found between pre-to-postop changes in lumbar lordosis, LL (r =  - 0.23, r =  - 0.43; p < 0.001), global tilt, GT (r = 0.26, r = 0.38; p < 0.001) and the Global Alignment and Proportion score, GAP (r = 0.26, r = 0.37; p < 0.001), and changes in compressive and shear forces at the proximal segment. GAP score parameters, thoracic kyphosis measurements and the slope of upper instrumented vertebra were associated with changes in shear. In patients with T10-pelvis fusion, moderate-to-strong associations were found between postoperative sagittal alignment measures and compressive and shear loads, with GT showing the strongest correlations (r = 0.75, r = 0.73, p < 0.001)., Conclusions: Spinal loads were estimated for patient-specific full spinal alignment profiles in a large cohort of patients with ASD pre-and postoperatively. Loads on the proximal segments were greater in association with sagittal malalignment and malorientation of proximal vertebra. Future work should explore whether they provide a causative mechanism explaining the associated risk of proximal junction complications., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Purpose: In patients with adult spinal deformity, it was previously shown that 16 of the non-management items of the SRS-instrument showed a better fit to the theoretical four-factor model (pain, function, self-image, mental health) than did all 20 items. Whether the same phenomenon is observed in data from younger (< 20y) patients, for whom the questionnaire was originally designed, is not currently known., Methods: Confirmatory factor analysis was used to evaluate the factor structure of the 20 non-management items of the SRS-instrument completed by 3618 young patients with spinal deformity (75.5% female; mean age, 15.0 ± 2.0 years) and of its equivalence across language versions (2713 English-speaking, 270 Spanish, 264 German, 223 Italian, and 148 French). The root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) and comparative fit index (CFI) indicated model fit., Results: Compared with the 20-item version, the 16-item solution significantly increased the fit (p < 0.001) across all language versions, to achieve good model fit (CFI = 0.96, RMSEA = 0.06). For both 16-item and 20-item models, equivalence across languages was not reached, with some items showing weaker item-loading for some languages, in particular German and French., Conclusion: In patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis, the shorter 16-item version showed a better fit to the intended 4-factor structure of the SRS-instrument. The wording of some of the items, and/or their equivalence across language versions, may need to be addressed. Questionnaire completion can be a burden for patients; if a shorter, more structurally valid version is available, its use should be encouraged., (© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Scoliosis Research Society.)

Background: Surgeons often rely on their intuition, experience and published data for surgical decision making and informed consent. Literature provides average values that do not allow for individualized assessments. Accurate validated machine learning (ML) risk calculators for adult spinal deformity (ASD) patients, based on 10 year multicentric prospective data, are currently available. The objective of this study is to assess surgeon ASD risk perception and compare it to validated risk calculator estimates., Methods: Nine ASD complete (demographics, HRQL, radiology, surgical plan) preoperative cases were distributed online to 100 surgeons from 22 countries. Surgeons were asked to determine the risk of major complications and reoperations at 72 h, 90 d and 2 years postop, using a 0-100% risk scale. The same preoperative parameters circulated to surgeons were used to obtain ML risk calculator estimates. Concordance between surgeons' responses was analyzed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) (poor < 0.5/excellent > 0.85). Distance between surgeons' and risk calculator predictions was assessed using the mean index of agreement (MIA) (poor < 0.5/excellent > 0.85)., Results: Thirty-nine surgeons (74.4% with > 10 years' experience), from 12 countries answered the survey. Surgeons' risk perception concordance was very low and heterogeneous. ICC ranged from 0.104 (reintervention risk at 72 h) to 0.316 (reintervention risk at 2 years). Distance between calculator and surgeon prediction was very large. MIA ranged from 0.122 to 0.416. Surgeons tended to overestimate the risk of major complications and reintervention in the first 72 h and underestimated the same risks at 2 years postop., Conclusions: This study shows that expert surgeon ASD risk perception is heterogeneous and highly discordant. Available validated ML ASD risk calculators can enable surgeons to provide more accurate and objective prognosis to adjust patient expectations, in real time, at the point of care., (© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Background: There are still no consensus criteria on how to select the lower instrumented vertebra (LIV) for traditional growing rods (TGRs) at index surgery. The aim was to evaluate whether the criteria used for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis fusion adapts to early onset scoliosis (EOS)., Methods: Retrospective analysis of prospectively longitudinal collected data in a consecutive cohort of patients with EOS treated with TGR, expanding from index surgery to 2 years after graduation. The LIV was analyzed regarding its relation to the stable vertebra (SV), substantially touched vertebra (STV), and not STV (NSTV). Failure of LIV selection was considered when revision surgery with distal extension was needed during follow up, due to adding on (ΔLIV tilt > 10°)., Results: A total of 25 patients met inclusion criteria. Mean age was 8.6 ± 3 (at index surgery), 15.1 ± 1.8 (at graduation), and 17.8 ± 1.6 (at final follow up). The most frequent LIV at index surgery was L3 (13/25); in 13 cases, STV was selected as LIV; in 7, it was NSTV; and in 5, SV on the standard postero-anterior radiographs. During follow up, a significant increase in the mean LIV tilt ( P = .049) and distal junctional angle ( P = .017) was found. Nine of the 25 patients (36%) developed adding on: 20% (1/5) of those with LIV at SV, 38.5% (5/13) at STV, and 42.8% (3/7) at NSTV. Of those 9 cases of adding on, only four needed distal extension (mean LIV tilt = 17.6°): 2 STV patients (15.4%), and 2 NSTV patients (28.6%). None of the patients with the LIV chosen at SV needed distal extension due to adding on., Conclusions: The more cranial the selection of the LIV above the SV, the higher the risk of adding on and of revision surgery with distal extension during follow up. Saving motion segments could be justified by choosing STV as LIV because the need for distal extension is not high, and it can be scheduled during lengthening procedures or at graduation surgery., Level of Evidence: 4., Clinical Relevance: Choosing the correct LIV in TGR index surgery is crucial to have a secure distal foundation, control and correct the deformity during growth, and save distal segments to allow growth and mobility., (This manuscript is generously published free of charge by ISASS, the International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery. Copyright © 2021 ISASS.)

Purpose: There are still no data proving whether restoring the ideal sagittal profile (according to Roussouly classification) in adult scoliosis (AS) patients leads to any additional benefit, especially regarding mechanical complications., Methods: Retrospective analysis of operated AS patients recorded in a prospective multicenter database. Demographic and radiographic (preoperative and 6-week postoperative) data were analyzed. Patients with and without mechanical complications were compared looking especially at the surgical restoration of the ideal (based on Pelvic Incidence) sagittal profile. Univariate and multivariate analysis was performed to identify causes of mechanical complications at 2-year minimum follow-up., Results: Ninty-six AS patients were analyzed. Thirty-nine patients suffered a mechanical complication (18 PJK, 11 pseudoarthrosis, 10 screw pull-out), and 57 patients had no mechanical complications. Postoperatively, 72% of patients not matching the ideal Roussouly-type suffered mechanical complications compared to 15% of matched patients (P < 0.001). Univariate analysis showed that older patients 64.9 ± 13 versus 40.7 ± 15.6 years (P < 0.001), higher postoperative Global Tilt (27° vs. 14.7°) and Pelvic Tilt (25° vs. 16°) (P < 0.001), upper instrumented vertebra at the thoracolumbar junction (62% vs. 21%) (P < 0.001), fixation to the Iliac (76% vs. 6%) (P < 0.001), and postoperative Roussouly-type mismatch (72% vs. 15%) (P < 0.001) significantly increased the rate of mechanical complications. Multivariate logistic regression analysis selected: postoperative Roussouly-type mismatch (OR = 41.9; 95%CI = 5.5-315.7; P < 0.001), iliac instrumentation (OR = 19.4; 95%CI = 2.6-142.5; P = 0.004), and age (OR = 1.1; 95%CI = 1.02-1.16; P = 0.004), as the most important variables., Conclusions: Adult scoliosis surgery should restore the ideal Roussouly sagittal profile to decrease the rate of mechanical complications, especially in patients older than 65, instrumented to the pelvis. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

Purpose: Major complications are a concern following ASD surgery. Even when properly managed and resolved, they may still have a relevant impact on HRQL. We aimed to investigate the impact of resolved early major complications on 2-year outcome after ASD surgery., Methods: Two groups of consecutive surgical patients were extracted from a prospective multicentre database. Major complication group (MCG) included patients with any major complication, resolved within 6 months after surgery. Patients with further major complications during follow-up were excluded. Control group (CG) included patients with no major complications over the entire follow-up. Analysis of covariance adjusting for preoperative baseline values was used to compare improvements in HRQL measures at 2 years., Results: One hundred and seventy-five patients met the inclusion criteria and had complete HRQL data at 2 years (24 MCG, 151 CG). MCG patients were older and had more severe deformity and poorer baseline HRQL. There were 27 resolved major complications at 6 months needing 19 additional surgeries (18 revisions, 1 cholecystectomy). At 2 years, and after adjusting for preoperative data, outcome in MCG patients was as follows: scores were 5.98 (SE 3.03) points higher for the ODI (p = 0.05), 0.36 (SE 0.13) lower SRS-22 function (p = 0.01), 4.07 (SE 1.93) lower SF-36 PCS (p = 0.04), and 0.16 (SE 0.13) lower SRS-22 subtotal (p = 0.22)., Conclusion: The results indicate that patients experiencing major complications after ASD surgery have significantly less functional improvement (SRS-22 function, ODI, SF-36 PCS) than their complication-free counterparts, even when complications were considered resolved, and the outcome was measured after an 18-month complication-free period. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

Objective: Adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery has a high rate of major complications (MCs). Public information about adverse outcomes is currently limited to registry average estimates. The object of this study was to assess the incidence of adverse events after ASD surgery, and to develop and validate a prognostic tool for the time-to-event risk of MC, hospital readmission (RA), and unplanned reoperation (RO)., Methods: Two models per outcome, created with a random survival forest algorithm, were trained in an 80% random split and tested in the remaining 20%. Two independent prospective multicenter ASD databases, originating from the European continent and the United States, were queried, merged, and analyzed. ASD patients surgically treated by 57 surgeons at 23 sites in 5 countries in the period from 2008 to 2016 were included in the analysis., Results: The final sample consisted of 1612 ASD patients: mean (standard deviation) age 56.7 (17.4) years, 76.6% women, 10.4 (4.3) fused vertebral levels, 55.1% of patients with pelvic fixation, 2047.9 observation-years. Kaplan-Meier estimates showed that 12.1% of patients had at least one MC at 10 days after surgery; 21.5%, at 90 days; and 36%, at 2 years. Discrimination, measured as the concordance statistic, was up to 71.7% (95% CI 68%-75%) in the development sample for the postoperative complications model. Surgical invasiveness, age, magnitude of deformity, and frailty were the strongest predictors of MCs. Individual cumulative risk estimates at 2 years ranged from 3.9% to 74.1% for MCs, from 3.17% to 44.2% for RAs, and from 2.67% to 51.9% for ROs., Conclusions: The creation of accurate prognostic models for the occurrence and timing of MCs, RAs, and ROs following ASD surgery is possible. The presented variability in patient risk profiles alongside the discrimination and calibration of the models highlights the potential benefits of obtaining time-to-event risk estimates for patients and clinicians.

Objective: Achieving high patient satisfaction with management is often one of the goals after adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery. However, literature on associated factors and their correlations with patient satisfaction is limited. The aim of this study was to determine the clinical and radiographic factors independently correlated with patient satisfaction in terms of management at 2 years after surgery., Methods: A multicenter prospective database of ASD surgery was retrospectively reviewed. The demographics, complications, health-related quality of life (HRQOL) subdomains, and radiographic parameters were examined to determine their correlation coefficients with the Scoliosis Research Society-22 questionnaire (SRS-22R) satisfaction scores at 2 years (Sat-2y score). Subsequently, factors determined to be independently associated with low satisfaction (Sat-2y score ≤ 4.0) were used to construct 2 types of multivariate models: one with 2-year data and the other with improvement (score at 2 years - score at baseline) data., Results: A total of 422 patients who underwent ASD surgery (mean age 53.1 years) were enrolled. All HRQOL subdomains and several coronal and sagittal radiographic parameters had significantly improved 2 years after surgery. The Sat-2y score was strongly correlated with the SRS-22R self-image (SI)/appearance subdomain (r = 0.64), followed by moderate correlation with subdomains related to standing (r = 0.53), body pain (r = 0.49-0.55), and function (r = 0.41-0.55) at 2 years. Conversely, the correlation between radiographic or demographic parameters with Sat-2y score was weak (r < 0.4). Multivariate analysis to eliminate confounding factors revealed that a worse Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score for standing (≥ 2 points; OR 4.48) and pain intensity (≥ 2 points; OR 2.07), SRS-22R SI/appearance subdomain (< 3 points; OR 2.70) at 2 years, and a greater sagittal vertical axis (SVA) (> 5 cm; OR 2.68) at 2 years were independent related factors for low satisfaction. According to the other model, a lower improvement in ODI for standing (< 30%; OR 2.68), SRS-22R pain (< 50%; OR 3.25) and SI/appearance (< 50%; OR 2.18) subdomains, and an inadequate restoration of the SVA from baseline (< 2 cm; OR 3.16) were associated with low satisfaction., Conclusions: Self-image, pain, standing difficulty, and sagittal alignment restoration may be useful goals in improving patient satisfaction with management at 2 years after ASD surgery. Surgeons and other medical providers have to take care of these factors to prevent low satisfaction.

Study Design: Report of four cases., Objective: To describe a series of pediatric patients with surgical scoliosis after chest wall resections due to Askin tumors., Summary of Background Data: Askin tumors are a rare type of chest wall solid tumors that can develop in children. Treatment involves chemotherapy and extensive surgical resection, including disarticulation of several ribs. This can cause thoracogenic scoliosis, with very scarce data found in the literature regarding its treatment and prognosis., Materials and Methods: Retrospective descriptive series of four cases of scoliosis in pediatric patients, secondary to extensive chest resections due to Akin's tumors. We analyzed the results of the surgical treatment., Results: Three girls and one boy with a mean age of 8.7 ± 2.2 years and 7 ± 3.6 years of follow-up were included. In all cases, the convexity of the thoracic curvature was toward the area of chest resection, occurring a mean of 1.9±1.3 years after thoracic surgery. A distraction-based system (two vertically expandable prosthetic titanium rib [VEPTR], two traditional growing rods) was used to correct the scoliosis. The preoperative Cobb angle (68.7° ± 22.9°) was corrected to 32.6° ± 9.7° at final follow-up. Preoperative coronal imbalance was 2.95 ± 1.86 cm and was corrected to 0.3 ± 0.6 cm at final follow-up. No changes were observed regarding preoperative kyphosis 30° ± 8.7° (33°±8° final). T1-S1 initial length was 29.65 cm changing to 40.65 cm. T1-T12 height went from 18.25 to 23.67 cm. There was one complication secondary to the proximal anchoring., Conclusions: For treatment of scoliosis secondary to extensive chest resection in the growing children with Askin tumors, distraction-based growth-friendly treatment is an available surgical option. Seven years of follow-up showed more than 50% improvement of the Cobb angle, and an average thoracic and trunk growth of 5.42 and 11 cm, respectively., Level of Evidence: Level IV., (Copyright © 2018 Scoliosis Research Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To assess the ability of the recently developed adult spinal deformity frailty index (ASD-FI) to predict odds of perioperative complications, odds of reoperation, and length of hospital stay after adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery using a database other than the one used to create the index., Methods: We used the ASD-FI to calculate frailty scores for 266 ASD patients who had minimum postoperative follow-up of 2 years in the European Spine Study Group (ESSG) database. Patients were enrolled from 2012 through 2013. Using ASD-FI scores, we categorized patients as not frail (NF) (< 0.3 points), frail (0.3-0.5 points), or severely frail (SF) (> 0.5 points). Multivariable logistic regression, adjusted for preoperative and surgical factors such as operative time and blood loss, was performed to determine the relationship between ASD-FI category and odds of major complications, odds of reoperation, and length of hospital stay., Results: We categorized 135 patients (51%) as NF, 90 patients (34%) as frail, and 41 patients (15%) as SF. Overall mean ASD-FI score was 0.29 (range 0-0.8). The adjusted odds of experiencing a major intraoperative or postoperative complication (OR 4.5, 95% CI 2.0-10) or having a reoperation (OR 3.9, 95% CI 1.7-8.9) were higher for SF patients compared with NF patients. Mean hospital stay was 2.1 times longer (95% CI 1.8-2.4) for SF patients compared with NF patients., Conclusions: Greater patient frailty, as measured by the ASD-FI, is associated with longer hospital stays and greater odds of major complications and reoperation. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

Study Design: Retrospective comparative analysis of data collected prospectively in an adult spine deformity (ASD) multicenter database., Objective: To evaluate the impact of the iliac screws on the quality of life of ASD patients compared with those instrumented above the pelvis (L5/S1/S2)., Summary of Background Data: The impact on patient's daily activities and functions, of immobilizing the sacroiliac joint with iliac screws for the treatment of ASD is still underexplored., Methods: Inclusion criteria were ASD patients with a long arthrodesis of at least eight levels and whose lowest instrumented vertebrae (LIV) were L5 or below. We analyzed the following preoperative and 2 years' follow-up variables: age, Cobb angle, coronal and sagittal alignment, number of instrumented levels, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Core Outcome Measures Index (COMI), Scoliosis Research Society-22 (SRS-22), and Short Form 36 (SF-36) questionnaires. Statistical analysis was performed with Mann-Whitney U test, and Wilcoxon test., Results: A total of 129 patients were included, and separated into two groups: "Iliac Yes," with the LIV at the Ilium (N = 104), and "iliac No," with the LIV at L5/S1/S2 (N = 25). Patients instrumented with Iliac screws were older (x = 66 vs. 56 yr, P = 0.008), and had lower Cobb magnitude (x = 31° vs. 45°, P = 0.019). No statistically significant differences were found in the health related quality of life (HRQOL) questionnaires prior to surgery or at 2-years' follow up. The "Iliac Yes" group significantly improved all radiographic and HRQOL scores parameters 2 years after surgery (P < 0.005). While the "Iliac No" group failed to significantly improve (coronal balance, sagittal vertical axis, SF-36 Physical functioning, SF-36 General health, and COMI) (P > 0.05) CONCLUSION.: ASD patients instrumented with iliac screws significantly improved all their HRQOL questionnaires 2 years after surgery. The 2 years' postoperative HRQOL scores were similar in both groups, regardless of the sacroiliac joint immobilization. Therefore, with the currently available tools, we cannot state that iliac instrumentation has a negative influence on patient's quality of life., Level of Evidence: 4.

Background Context: Revision surgery represents a major event for patients undergoing adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery. Previous reports suggest that ASD surgery has minimal or no impact on health-related-quality of life (HRQOL) outcomes., Purpose: The present study aims to investigate the impact of early reoperations within the first year on HRQOL and on the likelihood of reaching the minimally clinically important difference (MCID) after ASD surgery., Design: This is a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from consecutive surgically treated adult deformity surgery patients included in a multicenter, international database., Patient Sample: The present study included 280 patients from a multicenter international prospective database., Outcome Measure: Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Short Form-36 (SF-36), Scoliosis Research Society-22 (SRS-22), MCID were evaluated in this work., Methods: Consecutive surgical patients with ASD recruited prospectively in six different centers from four countries with a minimum 2-year follow-up were stratified into two groups: R (revision surgery within the first year) and NR (no revision). Health-related-quality of life (ODI, SF-36, SRS-22) was assessed and compared at 6-month, 1-year, and 2-year follow-up stages. Statistical analysis included chi-square tests, Student t tests, and linear mixed models., Results: Forty-three patients (R Group) received 46 revision surgeries. Nineteen patients (41.3%) had implant-related complications, 9 patients (19.6%) had deep surgical site infections, 9 patients (19.6%) had proximal junctional kyphosis, 3 patients (6.5%) had hematoma, and 6 patients (13%) had other complications. Baseline characteristics differed between groups. At 6 months, all HRQOL scores improved in both groups, except in the SF-36 Mental Component Summary and SRS-22 mental health domain in the R Group. At 1 year, ODI and SRS-22 improvement was significantly greater in the NR Group, exceeding the reported MCID. At the 2-year follow-up, ODI, SRS-22, SF-36 MCS, and SF-36 PCS improvement was similar in both groups. However, postoperative change was only above the MCID for SF-36 PCS, ODI, and SRS-22 in the NR Group., Conclusions: Early unanticipated revision surgery has a negative impact on mental health at 6 months and reduces the chances of reaching an MCID improvement in SRS-22, SF-36 PCS, and ODI at the 2-year follow-up., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Aims: The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of surgery using growing rods in patients with severe versus moderate early-onset scoliosis (EOS)., Patients and Methods: A review of a multicentre EOS database identified 107 children with severe EOS (major curve ≥ 90°) treated with growing rods before the age of ten years with a minimum follow-up of two years and three or more lengthening procedures. From the same database, 107 matched controls with moderate EOS were identified., Results: The mean preoperative major curve was 101° (90 to 139) in the severe group and 67° (33° to 88°) in the moderate group (p < 0.001), which was corrected at final follow-up to 57° (10° to 96°) in the severe group and 40° (3° to 85°) in the moderate group (p < 0.001). T1-S1 height increased by a mean of 54 mm (-8 to 131) in the severe group and 27 mm (-4 to 131) in the moderate group at the initial surgery (p < 0.001), and by 50 mm (-17 to 200) and 54 mm (-11 to 212), respectively, during distraction (p = 0.84). The mean number of complications per patient was 2.6 (0 to 14) in the severe group and 1.9 (0 to 10) in the moderate group (p = 0.040). Five patients (4.7%) in the severe group and three (2.8%) in the moderate group developed a neurological deficit postoperatively (p = 0.47)., Conclusion: Severe EOS can be treated effectively using growing rods, but the risk of complications is high. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2018;100-B:772-9.

Study Design: Retrospective comparative analysis., Objective: Study early-onset scoliosis (EOS) graduated patients to establish founded criteria for graduation decision making and determine the risks and benefits of definitive fusion., Summary of Background Data: EOS is treated by growth-friendly techniques until skeletal maturity. Afterwards, patients can be "graduated," either by definitive fusion (posterior spinal fusion [PSF]) or by retaining the previous implants (Observation) with no additional surgery. Criteria for this decision making and the outcomes of definitive fusion are still underexplored., Methods: We analyzed a consecutive cohort of "graduated" patients after a distraction-based lengthening program. We gathered demographic, radiographic, and surgical data. The results of the two final treatment options were compared after 2 years' follow-up., Results: A total of 32 patients were included. Four patients had incomplete records. Thirteen underwent PSF, and 15 were observed. The mean age at initial treatment was 8 ± 3 years, with a mean follow-up of 8.3 ± 2.9 years. Both groups had similar preoperative and final radiographic parameters (p > .05). The criteria for undergoing PSF were as follows: implant-related complications, main curve magnitude (PSF = 63.2° ± 9° vs. OBS = 47.9° ± 15°; p = .008), curve progression >10°, and sagittal misalignment (SVA). During PSF 12/13 patients underwent multiple osteotomies, one vertebrectomy, and 3 costoplasties. Surgical time was 291.5 ± 58 minutes; blood loss was 946 ± 375 mL; and the number of levels fused was 13.7. Coronal deformity was corrected 31%, T1-S1 length gained was 31 ± 19.6 mm and T1-T12 length gained was 9.3 ± 39 mm; kyphosis was reduced by 22%. However, coronal balance worsened by 2.3 ± 30.8 mm. No major complications were encountered in these patients., Conclusions: Graduation by PSF depended on unacceptable or progressive major curve deformity, sagittal misalignment, or complications with previous implants. Observation depended on curve stabilization, Cobb <50°, and coronal misalignment <20 mm. Definitive fusion effectively corrected coronal and sagittal deformity and increased trunk height. However, it exposed patients to a very demanding surgery without improvement in coronal balance., Level of Evidence: Level III, therapeutic., (Copyright © 2017 Scoliosis Research Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

OBJECTIVE The subtraction of lumbar lordosis (LL) from the pelvic incidence (PI) offers an estimate of the LL required for a given PI value. Relative LL (RLL) and the lordosis distribution index (LDI) are PI-based individualized measures. RLL quantifies the magnitude of lordosis relative to the ideal lordosis as defined by the magnitude of PI. LDI defines the magnitude of lower arc lordosis in proportion to total lordosis. The aim of this study was to compare RLL and PI - LL for their ability to predict postoperative complications and their correlations with health-related quality of life (HRQOL) scores. METHODS Inclusion criteria were ≥ 4 levels of fusion and ≥ 2 years of follow-up. Mechanical complications were proximal junctional kyphosis/proximal junctional failure, distal junctional kyphosis/distal junctional failure, rod breakage, and implant-related complications. Correlations between PI - LL, RLL, PI, and HRQOL were analyzed using the Pearson correlation coefficient. Mechanical complication rates in PI - LL, RLL, LDI, RLL, and LDI interpreted together, and RLL subgroups for each PI - LL category were compared using chi-square tests and the exact test. Predictive models for mechanical complications with RLL and PI - LL were analyzed using binomial logistic regressions. RESULTS Two hundred twenty-two patients (168 women, 54 men) were included. The mean age was 52.2 ± 19.3 years (range 18-84 years). The mean follow-up was 28.8 ± 8.2 months (range 24-62 months). There was a significant correlation between PI - LL and PI (r = 0.441, p < 0.001), threatening the use of PI - LL to quantify spinopelvic mismatch for different PI values. RLL was not correlated with PI (r = -0.093, p > 0.05); therefore, it was able to quantify divergence from ideal lordosis for all PI values. Compared with PI - LL, RLL had stronger correlations with HRQOL scores (p < 0.05). Discrimination performance was better for the model with RLL than for PI - LL. The agreement between RLL and PI - LL was high (κ = 0.943, p < 0.001), moderate (κ = 0.455, p < 0.001), and poor (κ = -0.154, p = 0.343), respectively, for large, average, and small PI sizes. When analyzed by RLL, each PI - LL category was further divided into distinct groups of patients who had different mechanical complication rates (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Using the formula of PI - LL may be insufficient to quantify normolordosis for the whole spectrum of PI values when applied as an absolute numeric value in conjunction with previously reported population-based average thresholds of 10° and 20°. Schwab PI - LL groups were found to constitute an inhomogeneous group of patients. RLL offers an individualized quantification of LL for all PI sizes. Compared with PI - LL, RLL showed a greater association with both mechanical complications and HRQOL. The use of RLL and LDI together, instead of PI - LL, for surgical planning may result in lower mechanical complication rates and better long-term HRQOL.

Objective: The aim of this work is to evaluate and compare the radiographic results and complications of the surgical treatment of adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis greater than 75 degrees, using a double approach (DA) or an isolated posterior approach with hybrid instruments (posterior hybrid [PH]), or with «all-pedicle screws» (posterior screws [PS])., Material and Method: A retrospective review was performed on 69 patients with idiopathic scoliosis greater than 75°, with a follow-up of more than 2 years, to analyze the flexibility of the curves, the correction obtained, and the complications depending on the type of surgery. The Kruskal-Wallis test for non-parametric variables was used for the statistical analysis., Results: There were no statistically significant differences between the 3 patient groups in the pre-surgical Cobb angle values (DA=89°, PH=83°, PS=83°), in the immediate post-surgical (DA=34°, PH=33°, PS=30°), nor at the end of follow-up (DA=36°, PH=36°, PS=33°) (P>.05). The percentage correction (DA=60%, PH=57%, PS=60%) was similar between groups (P>.05). The percentage of complications associated with the procedure was 20.8% in DA, 10% in PH and 20% in PS. Two patients in the PS group showed changes, with no neurological lesions, in the spinal cord monitoring, and one patient in the same group suffered a delayed and transient incomplete lesion., Discussion and Conclusions: No significant differences were observed in the correction of severe idiopathic scoliosis between patients operated using the double or isolated posterior approach, regardless of the type of instrumentation used., (Copyright © 2013 SECOT. Published by Elsevier Espana. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To create an experimental structural scoliosis model in mice to evaluate the efficacy of shape-memory metals to gradually correct the deformity over time., Material and Method: Experimental scoliosis was generated in 3 week-old mice by means of a suture between the left scapula and pelvis for 8 weeks. They were then randomised into two groups: a control group, in which the suture was cut, and another, in those that also had a Nitinol straight memory-wire implant fixed to the column. Serial X-rays were performed to determine the efficacy of the Nitinol in the correction of the scoliosis. In a second time, the histological changes at apical vertical body level and the adjacent discs were evaluated pre- and post-correction., Results: A mean 81.5° kyphoscoliosis was gradually induced. In the control group, after cutting the suture, an initial reduction in the deformity was observed, but later it remained stable throughout the time (54° at two weeks). In the Nitinol group, a gradual reduction was observed in the scoliosis angle value, to a mean of 8.7° at two weeks. The curvature of the apical vertebral body and adjacent discs were partially corrected after two weeks of correcting the deformity., Conclusion: This scoliosis model has demonstrated the efficacy of a straight Nitinol wire fixed to the spinal column in the gradual correction of kyphoscoliosis and in the changes in its adjacent structures., (Copyright © 2013 SECOT. Published by Elsevier Espana. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To determine the efficacy of growing rods in the treatment of early onset scoliosis., Material and Methods: A total of 32 patients were treated using fusion techniques that included double growing rods and Vertical Expandable Prosthetic Titanium Ribs (VEPTR), in our Early Onset Scoliosis Centre between 2004 and 2011. After analysing the clinical histories and x-rays, 20 patients were included due to meeting the inclusion criteria. All patients had previously received conservative treatment with cranial traction and a series of plasters/corsets. The deformity was analysed before and after the initial surgery, and in successive tightenings, using the x-rays of the coronal and sagittal planes by means of the Cobb angle, as well as the longitudinal and coronal growth of the thorax, and the growth of the spinal column. A series of 188 x-rays of 53 patients with cystic fibrosis were studied in order to perform a comparative analysis with the patients with early-onset scoliosis., Results: There was significant improvement in the angle (Cobb and kyphosis) and linear parameters (T1-S1 distance, T1-T12 distance, and coronal width of the thorax) after the initial surgery, but the successive tightenings had a minimal beneficial effect, losing effectiveness over a period of time. The patients with early-onset scoliosis showed a lower growth of the thorax compared to the patients with cystic fibrosis., Discussion: Treatment of early-onset scoliosis with expandable devices is mainly beneficial with the initial procedure and the first tightenings, but shows a loss of efficacy over a period time., (Copyright © 2012 SECOT. Published by Elsevier Espana. All rights reserved.)

Background: To report to the orthopedic community a case of vertebral fracture and adjacent vertebral subluxation through the upper instrumented vertebra after thoracolumbar fusion with augmentation of the cranial level., Methods: This report reviewed the patient`s medical record, her imaging studies and related literature. The possible factors contributing to this fracture are hypothesized., Results: A 70-year-old woman underwent decompressive surgery and posterolateral fusion for adult lumbar scoliosis. We used pedicular screws from T10 to S1 and iliac screw at the right side, augmented with cement at T10, T11, L1, L5 and S1; and prophylactic vertebroplasty at T9 to avoid the "topping-off syndrome".Thirty days after discharge, without recognizable inciting trauma, the patient complained of pain in the lower thoracic area. The exam revealed overall neurological deficit below the level of fracture.CT scan and MRI demonstrated a T10 vertebral collapse and T9 vertebral subluxation with morphologic features of flexion-distraction fracture through the upper edge of the screw.At this point, the authors performed posterior decompression at T9 to T10 and extended posterolateral arthrodesis from T2 to T10.To our knowledge, this is an unreported fracture., Conclusions: Augmentation of the cranial level in a long thoracolumbar fusion has been developed to avoid the junctional kyphosis and compression fractures at that level. We alert the orthopedic community that this augmentation may lead to further and more severe fractures, although this opinion requires investigation for confirmation.