1. High-resolution flat panel CT versus 3-T MR arthrography of the wrist: initial results in vivo
- Author
-
Bernhard C. Meyer, Thomas Werncke, Lena Sonnow, R Luketina, C. von Falck, S Koennecker, Jan B. Hinrichs, and Frank Wacker
- Subjects
Adult ,Cartilage, Articular ,Male ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Adolescent ,Image quality ,High resolution ,Wrist ,Sensitivity and Specificity ,Flat panel ,030218 nuclear medicine & medical imaging ,Young Adult ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Mr arthrography ,medicine ,Humans ,Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging ,In patient ,Arthrography ,Aged ,Retrospective Studies ,Ligaments ,medicine.diagnostic_test ,business.industry ,Magnetic resonance imaging ,General Medicine ,Middle Aged ,Wrist Injuries ,Arthralgia ,Magnetic Resonance Imaging ,medicine.anatomical_structure ,Subchondral bone ,Hand Bones ,030220 oncology & carcinogenesis ,Female ,Radiology ,Artifacts ,Tomography, X-Ray Computed ,business - Abstract
The objective of this study was to compare the diagnostic performance of direct C-arm flat panel computed tomography arthrography (FPCT-A) with direct magnetic resonance arthrography (MR-A) of the wrist in patients with clinically suspected pathologies. Forty-nine patients underwent tri-compartmental wrist arthrography. FPCT-A was acquired using a high-resolution acquisition mode, followed by a 3-T MR exam using a dedicated wrist coil. Image quality and artifacts of FPCT-A and MR-A were evaluated with regard to the depictability of anatomical structures. The time stamps for the different image acquisitions were recorded for workflow assessment. Image quality was rated significantly superior for all structures for FPCT-A (p
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF