Search

Objective: To describe heat-related illness and provide approaches for treatment in family practice., Sources of Information: The MeSH terms heat-related illness and primary care were searched in PubMed. Clinical trials, practice reviews, and systematic reviews were included in this review. Reference lists were reviewed for additional articles., Main Message: Extreme heat events are increasing in frequency due to climate change and can directly result in heat exhaustion, heat stroke, or death. Exposure to extreme heat also exacerbates underlying health conditions. Patients may be at increased risk of heat-related illness because of underlying sensitivity to heat, increased exposure to heat, or barriers to resources., Conclusion: Family physicians can help prevent heat-related illness by identifying and counselling patients who are at increased risk and by advocating for interventions that reduce the chance of heat-related illness., (Copyright © 2024 the College of Family Physicians of Canada.)

Introduction The World Health Organization (WHO) Safe Surgery Checklist significantly decreases morbidity and mortality in regular operating room cases. However, significant differences in workflow and processes exist between regular operating room cases and cesarean sections performed on the labor and delivery unit. The aim of this study is to adapt the WHO Safe Surgery Checklist for the labor and delivery unit and cesarean sections to improve communication and patient safety. Methods A multidisciplinary team consisting of all major stakeholders reviewed and revised the WHO Safe Surgery Checklist making it more applicable to cesarean section operations. The new Safe Cesarean Section Checklist was tested and then integrated into the electronic medical record and utilized on the labor and delivery unit. A specific cesarean section safety attitudes questionnaire was developed, validated, and administered prior to and one year after implementation. Results Usage of the Safe Cesarean Section Checklist was greater than 95% after initial implementation. Significant improvements were reported by the staff on the cesarean section attitudes questionnaire for several key areas including the feeling that all necessary information was available at the beginning of the procedure, decreases in communication breakdowns and delays, and fewer issues related to not knowing who was in charge during the procedure. Discussion Implementation of the Safe Cesarean Section Checklist was successfully adopted by the staff, and improvements in staff perceptions of several key safety issues on our unit were demonstrated. Additional studies should be undertaken to determine if clinical outcomes from this intervention are comparable to those seen with the use of the WHO Safe Surgery Checklist., Competing Interests: Human subjects: Consent was obtained or waived by all participants in this study. Madigan Army Medical Center issued approval MCHJ-CLG-A. The Safe Cesarean Section Checklist was implemented for a trial period in the labor and delivery unit. During this time, a departmental policy detailing the program was drafted and signed by the department chief. This study was reviewed by the Chief of the Department of Clinical Investigation at the military treatment facility (MTF) and approved for publication as a quality improvement project with exempt status. Because this was a process/quality improvement project, that was the route of review per their process at the time when it was completed. Animal subjects: All authors have confirmed that this study did not involve animal subjects or tissue. Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following: Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work. Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work. Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work., (Copyright © 2024, Patel et al.)

Objective: To determine the impact of the Obstetric Simulation Training and Teamwork (OB-STaT) curriculum on postpartum haemorrhage (PPH) rates and outcomes., Design: Before-and-after study., Setting: Maternity care hospitals within the USA., Population: Patients who delivered between February 2018 and November 2019., Methods: Interprofessional obstetric teamwork training (OB-STaT) conducted at each hospital. Electronic medical records for deliveries were reviewed for 6 months before and after conducting OB-STaT at participating hospitals., Main Outcome Measures: The PPH rate (blood loss of ≥1000 ml), uterotonic medications used, tranexamic acid use, blood product transfusion, hysterectomy, length of stay and composite maternal morbidity (postpartum haemorrhage, hysterectomy, transfusion of ≥4 units of blood products and intensive care unit admission for PPH)., Results: A total of 9980 deliveries were analysed: 5059 before and 4921 after OB-STaT. The PPH rates did not change significantly (5.48% before vs 5.14% after, p = 0.46). Composite maternal morbidity decreased significantly by 1.1% (6.35%-5.28%, p = 0.03), massive transfusions decreased by 57% (0.42%-0.18%, p = 0.04) and the mean postpartum length of stay decreased from 2.05 days (1.05 days SD) to 2.01 days (0.91 days SD) (p = 0.04). Following OB-STaT, haemorrhage medication use increased by 36% (14.8%-51.2%, p = 0.03), the use of tranexamic acid for PPH treatment almost doubled (2.7%-4.8%, p < 0.001) and the rate of hysterectomy significantly increased (0%-0.1%, p = 0.03)., Conclusions: Although the PPH rates did not decrease, OB-STaT significantly improved maternal morbidity, decreased massive transfusions, and improved PPH management by increasing the utilization of uterotonic medications, tranexamic acid and hysterectomy., (© 2023 The Authors. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This article has been contributed to by U.S. Government employees and their work is in the public domain in the USA.)

Objective: To assess the knowledge, skills, and self-efficacy of health care participants completing a simulation-based blended learning training curriculum on managing maternal medical emergencies and maternal cardiac arrest (Obstetric Life Support)., Methods: A formative assessment of the Obstetric Life Support curriculum was performed with a prehospital cohort comprising emergency medical services professionals and a hospital-based cohort comprising health care professionals who work primarily in hospital or urgent care settings and respond to maternal medical emergencies. The training consisted of self-guided precourse work and an instructor-led simulation course using a customized low-fidelity simulator. Baseline and postcourse assessments included multiple-choice cognitive test, self-efficacy questionnaire, and graded Megacode assessment of the team leader. Megacode scores and pass rates were analyzed descriptively. Pre- and post-self-confidence assessments were compared with an exact binomial test, and cognitive scores were compared with generalized linear mixed models., Results: The training was offered to 88 participants between December 2019 and November 2021. Eighty-five participants consented to participation; 77 participants completed the training over eight sessions. At baseline, fewer than half of participants were able to achieve a passing score on the cognitive assessment as determined by the expert panel. After the course, mean cognitive assessment scores improved by 13 points, from 69.4% at baseline to 82.4% after the course (95% CI 10.9-15.1, P <.001). Megacode scores averaged 90.7±6.4%. The Megacode pass rate was 96.1%. There were significant improvements in participant self-efficacy, and the majority of participants (92.6%) agreed or strongly agreed that the course met its educational objectives., Conclusion: After completing a simulation-based blended learning program focused on managing maternal cardiac arrest using a customized low-fidelity simulator, most participants achieved a defensible passing Megacode score and significantly improved their knowledge, skills, and self-efficacy., (Copyright © 2023 Written work prepared by employees of the Federal Government as part of their official duties is, under the U.S. Copyright Act, a “work of the United States Government” for which copyright protection under Title 17 of the United States Code is not available. As such, copyright does not extend to the contributions of employees of the Federal Government.)

Optimal sleep health is a critical component to high-level performance. In populations such as the military, public service (eg, firefighters), and health care, achieving optimal sleep health is difficult and subsequently deficiencies in sleep health may lead to performance decrements. However, advances in sleep monitoring technologies and mitigation strategies for poor sleep health show promise for further ecological scientific investigation within these populations. The current review briefly outlines the relationship between sleep health and performance as well as current advances in behavioral and technological approaches to improving sleep health for performance., (Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Simulation is a critical part of training for obstetric emergencies. Incorporation of this training modality has been shown to improve outcomes for patients and is now required by national accrediting organizations., Competing Interests: Disclosure The authors have no financial conflicts of interest to disclose., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: This study aims to compare a conventional medical treatment model with a telehealth platform for Maternal Fetal Medicine (MFM) outpatient care during the global novel coronavirus pandemic., Methods: In this study, we described the process of converting our MFM clinic from a conventional medical treatment model to a telemedicine platform. We compared clinical productivity between the two models. Outcomes were analysed using standard statistical tests., Results: We suffered three symptomatic COVID-19 infections among our clinical providers and staff prior to the conversion, compared with none after the conversion. We had a significant decrease in patient visits following the conversion (53.35 visits per day versus 40.3 visits per day, p  < 0.0001). However, our average daily patient visits per full-time equivalent (FTE) were only marginally reduced (11.1 visit per FTE versus 7.6 visits per FTE, p  < 0.0001), resulting in a relative decrease in adjusted work relative value units (6987 versus 5440). There was an increase in more basic follow-up ultrasound procedures, complexity (current procedural technology [CPT] code 76816 (10.7% versus 19.5%, relative risk [RR] 1.81, 95% CI 1.60-2.05, p  < 0.0001)) over comprehensive follow-up ultrasound procedures, CPT code 76805 (17.2% versus 7.8%, RR 0.46, 95% CI 0.39-0.53, p  < 0.0001) after conversion. Despite similar proportions of new consults, there was an increase in the proportion of follow-up visits and medical decision-making complexity evaluation and management CPT codes (e.g. 99214/99215) after the conversion (17.2% versus 24.6%, RR 1.43, 95% CI 1.26-163, p < 0.0001). There were no differences between amniocentesis procedures performed between the two time periods (0.3% versus 0.2%, p  = 0.5805)., Conclusion: The rapid conversion of an MFM platform from convention medical treatment to telemedicine platform in response to the novel coronavirus pandemic resulted in protection of healthcare personnel and MFM patients, with only a modest decrease in clinical productivity during the initial roll-out. Due to the ongoing threat from the novel coronavirus-19, an MFM telemedicine platform is a practicable and innovative solution and merits the continued support of CMS and health care administrators.

Background: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a sleep disorder prevalent in >10% of individuals diagnosed with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is the first-line therapy for OSA, but many do not use it enough during sleep to effectively manage OSA. The O 2 VERLAP study compared proactive care (PC)-structured web-based peer-coaching education and support intervention versus reactive care (RC)-education and support based on limited scheduled interactions and patient-initiated contacts., Methods: Participants were primarily recruited from patient communities (COPD, OSA, and the National Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Network [PCORnet]) through electronic methods. Inclusion criteria: ≥40 years old, diagnosis of both COPD and OSA, and currently using CPAP. Participants were then randomly assigned to either the PC or RC group, with outcomes assessed at baseline and 6 and 12 weeks. The primary study outcome was CPAP adherence (hours of use/night) and secondary outcomes were daytime functioning, sleep quality, and daytime sleepiness. Changes in outcomes over time were examined using random effects models., Results: The study enrolled 332 participants of which 294 were randomized. While groups differed significantly in CPAP adherence at baseline (PC: 6.1±3.1, RC: 7.3±2.4 hours/night; P <0.001), there were no significant differences in change of primary and secondary outcomes at either 6 or 12 weeks., Conclusion: In this group of patients with both COPD and OSA on CPAP therapy, no difference was found between the provision of PC and RC. The study did find unexpectedly high baseline CPAP adherence levels, which suggests that any improvement from the intervention would have been very small and difficult to detect., (JCOPDF © 2022.)

Background: Teamwork and communication gaps are consistently cited as contributors to adverse outcomes in obstetrics. The Critical Care in Obstetrics Course provides an innovative experience by combining brief interactive didactics with the opportunity to practice and implement the knowledge gained with hands-on simulation. Most participants have never worked together, which creates a unique environment to evaluate the importance of teamwork and communication., Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the association between teamwork and medical management in high-fidelity critical care simulations., Study Design: The participants were separated into multidisciplinary teams and taken through simulations, including placental abruption, hypertensive emergency, eclampsia, sepsis, cardiac arrest, venous thromboembolism, diabetic ketoacidosis, and thyroid storm. Facilitators completed a validated checklist assessment for each group's performance in medical care and teamwork. Each element was rated on a scale from 1 to 5, with 1 being unacceptable and 5 being perfect. We evaluated 5 communication measures, including the use of closed-loop communication and orientation of new team members. A Spearman correlation was used to evaluate the relationship between total medical management and total teamwork scores and specific measures of team communication. Receiver operating characteristic curves were created for total teamwork score as a predictor of good or perfect medical management., Results: A total of 354 multidisciplinary teams participated in 1564 high-fidelity simulations. There was a significant correlation between medical management and teamwork and communication scores for all scenarios. The strongest correlation was for the total teamwork score for all simulations (ρ=0.84). Teamwork scores were highly predictive of medical management scores with an area under the curve of at least 0.88 for all simulations, although this was not significant for diabetic ketoacidosis., Conclusion: The quality of teamwork and communication correlated with the quality of clinical performance in newly formed multidisciplinary teams. This demonstrates the importance of teamwork training, with a focus on key communication tools and strategies, among medical providers to optimize the management of complex and emergent obstetrical conditions., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Conducting biomedical research using smartphones is a novel approach to studying health and disease that is only beginning to be meaningfully explored. Gathering large-scale, real-world data to track disease manifestation and long-term trajectory in this manner is quite practical and largely untapped. Researchers can assess large study cohorts using surveys and sensor-based activities that can be interspersed with participants' daily routines. In addition, this approach offers a medium for researchers to collect contextual and environmental data via device-based sensors, data aggregator frameworks, and connected wearable devices. The main aim of the SleepHealth Mobile App Study (SHMAS) was to gain a better understanding of the relationship between sleep habits and daytime functioning utilizing a novel digital health approach. Secondary goals included assessing the feasibility of a fully-remote approach to obtaining clinical characteristics of participants, evaluating data validity, and examining user retention patterns and data-sharing preferences. Here, we provide a description of data collected from 7,250 participants living in the United States who chose to share their data broadly with the study team and qualified researchers worldwide.

Objective: In the middle of the COVID-19 pandemic, guidelines and recommendations are rapidly evolving. Providers strive to provide safe high-quality care for their patients in the already high-risk specialty of Obstetrics while also considering the risk that this virus adds to their patients and themselves. From other pandemics, evidence exists that simulation is the most effective way to prepare teams, build understanding and confidence, and increase patient and provider safety., Finding: Practicing in-situ multidisciplinary simulations in the hospital setting has illustrated key opportunities for improvement that should be considered when caring for a patient with possible COVID-19., Conclusion: In the current COVID-19 pandemic, simulating obstetrical patient care from presentation to the hospital triage through postpartum care can prepare teams for even the most complicated patients while increasing their ability to protect themselves and their patients., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: We evaluated a novel simulation-based cesarean section training program to teach critical techniques for cesarean section and hemorrhage management.  Methods: This was a prospective educational intervention. After Institutional Review Board approval, we recruited Obstetrics and Gynecology, Family Medicine, and General Surgery residents at three hospitals. All participants received didactic education. Participants were then randomized into two arms with one group to receive task-trainer based training and the other no training. Afterwards, all residents had their performance of a complete cesarean section and management of a post-partum hemorrhage evaluated on a high-fidelity simulator. Evaluators were blinded to randomization., Experience: Thirty-three participants were recruited between July 2017 and January 2019. There were 19 trainees in the control group and 14 in the intervention group. The intervention group scored significantly higher on performance of the cesarean delivery (p-value 0.007), hemorrhage management (p-value 0.0002), and overall skill (p-value 0.008). There were no differences in the other categories., Conclusion: Participants trained with a combination of didactic education and task-trainers versus didactic education alone performed significantly better on all procedural aspects of a cesarean section and hemorrhage management on a high-fidelity simulator, demonstrating that simulation-based training allows trainees to gain procedural experience while decreasing patient risk., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist., (Copyright © 2020, Foglia et al.)

When viewing familiar stimuli (e.g., common words), processing is highly automatized such that it can interfere with the processing of incompatible sensory information. At least two mechanisms may help mitigate this interference. Early selection accounts posit that attentional processes filter out distracting sensory information to avoid conflict. Alternatively, late selection accounts hold that all sensory inputs receive full semantic analysis and that frontal executive mechanisms are recruited to resolve conflict. To test how these mechanisms operate to overcome conflict induced by highly automatized processing, we developed a novel version of the color-word Stroop task, where targets and distractors were simultaneously flickered at different frequencies. We measured the quality of early sensory processing by assessing the amplitude of steady-state visually evoked potentials (SSVEPs) elicited by targets and distractors. We also indexed frontal executive processes by assessing changes in frontal theta oscillations induced by color-word incongruency. We found that target- and distractor-related SSVEPs were not modulated by changes in the level of conflict whereas frontal theta activity increased on high compared to low conflict trials. These results suggest that frontal executive processes play a more dominant role in mitigating cognitive interference driven by the automatic tendency to process highly familiar stimuli., (© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Introduction: Vaginal deliveries that result in perineal trauma involve significant morbidity to women. Multiple strategies have been identified to reduce the risk of severe perineal lacerations. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of an interprofessional simulation-based teams-training program aimed at reducing severe perineal lacerations during childbirth., Methods: A quasi-experimental pre-post single-group design was used to examine the performance of labor and delivery personnel at a large multihospital system after participating in a mixed-modality simulation program for reducing perineal lacerations. Multiple educational strategies aimed at management of second stage of labor (including laboring down, warm compresses, coaching, positioning, perineal support, controlled delivery of fetal head, and mediolateral episiotomy techniques) were taught using patients, task trainers, and a standardized curriculum during interprofessional educational sessions. Primary study outcomes were as follows: (a) pre-post differences in knowledge; (b) pre-post differences in team performance assessments; and (c) pre-post differences in safety culture. Secondary outcomes were severe perineal laceration rates., Results: During an 18-month period, 675 personnel in 4 hospitals participated in the program. Significant improvement was noted in pre-post scores of knowledge (59.86%, 93.87%, P < 0.0001), performance (36.54%, 93.45%, P < 0.0001), and safety culture (3.24, 1.45, 1 = high, 5 = low, P < 0.0001). Severe perineal laceration rates decreased by 33.38% since initiation. Rates fluctuated with the addition of new personnel and renewed educational programs., Conclusions: A multimodal interprofessional simulation program of strategies to prevent severe perineal lacerations significantly improved knowledge, skills, and attitudes in labor and delivery personnel within a healthcare system. Severe perineal laceration rates were reduced.

Checklists are memory aids comprised of various tasks to complete a process and have been successful in preventing errors and improving performance in various fields including aviation, aeronautics, and construction. (1) In recent years, use of safety checklists has increased within the medical field to standardize care and improve communication amongst providers and they hold significant promise to improve outcomes during obstetric emergencies., (Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background: Participant recruitment can be a significant bottleneck in carrying out research studies. Connected health and mobile health platforms allow for the development of Web-based studies that can offer improvement in this domain. Sleep is of vital importance to the mental and physical health of all individuals, yet is understudied on a large scale or beyond the focus of sleep disorders. For this reason and owing to the availability of digital sleep tracking tools, sleep is well suited to being studied in a Web-based environment., Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate a method for speeding up the recruitment process and maximizing participant engagement using a novel approach, the Achievement Studies platform (Evidation Health, Inc, San Mateo, CA, USA), while carrying out a study that examined the relationship between participant sleep and daytime function., Methods: Participants could access the Web-based study platform at any time from any computer or Web-enabled device to complete study procedures and track study progress. Achievement community members were invited to the study and assessed for eligibility. Eligible participants completed an electronic informed consent process to enroll in the study and were subsequently invited to complete an electronic baseline questionnaire. Then, they were asked to connect a wearable device account through their study dashboard, which shared their device data with the research team. The data were used to provide objective sleep and activity metrics for the study. Participants who completed the baseline questionnaires were subsequently sent a daily single-item Sleepiness Checker activity for 7 consecutive days at baseline and every 3 months thereafter for 1 year., Results: Overall, 1156 participants enrolled in the study within a 5-day recruitment window. In the 1st hour, the enrollment rate was 6.6 participants per minute (394 per hour). In the first 24 hours, the enrollment rate was 0.8 participants per minute (47 participants per hour). Overall, 1132 participants completed the baseline questionnaires (1132/1156, 97.9%) and 1047 participants completed the initial Sleepiness Checker activity (1047/1156, 90.6%). Furthermore, 1000 participants provided activity-specific wearable data (1000/1156, 86.5%) and 982 provided sleep-specific wearable data (982/1156, 84.9%)., Conclusions: The Achievement Studies platform allowed for rapid recruitment and high study engagement (survey completion and device data sharing). This approach to carrying out research appears promising. However, conducting research in this way requires that participants have internet access and own and use a wearable device. As such, our sample may not be representative of the general population., (©Sean Deering, Madeline M Grade, Jaspreet K Uppal, Luca Foschini, Jessie L Juusola, Adam M Amdur, Carl J Stepnowsky. Originally published in JMIR Research Protocols (http://www.researchprotocols.org), 21.01.2019.)

Decision-making becomes slower when more choices are available. Existing models attribute this slowing to poor sensory processing, to attenuated rates of sensory evidence accumulation, or to increases in the amount of evidence required before committing to a decision (a higher decision threshold). However, studies have not isolated the effects of having more choices on sensory and decision-related processes from changes in task difficulty and divided attention. Here, we controlled task difficulty while independently manipulating the distribution of attention and the number of choices available to male and female human observers. We used EEG to measure steady-state visually evoked potentials (SSVEPs) and a frontal late positive deflection (LPD), EEG markers of sensory and postsensory decision-related processes, respectively. We found that dividing attention decreased SSVEP and LPD amplitudes, consistent with dampened sensory responses and slower rates of evidence accumulation, respectively. In contrast, having more choices did not alter SSVEP amplitude and led to a larger LPD. These results suggest that having more options largely spares early sensory processing and slows down decision-making via a selective increase in decision thresholds. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT When more choices are available, decision-making becomes slower. We tested whether this phenomenon is due to poor sensory processing, to reduced rates of evidence accumulation, or to increases in the amount of evidence required before committing to a decision (a higher decision threshold). We measured choice modulations of sensory and decision-related neural responses using EEG. We also minimized potential confounds from changes in the distribution of attention and task difficulty, which often covary with having more choices. Dividing attention reduced the activity levels of both sensory and decision-related responses. However, having more choices did not change sensory processing and led to larger decision-related responses. These results suggest that having more choices spares sensory processing and selectively increases decision thresholds., (Copyright © 2018 the authors 0270-6474/18/388635-15$15.00/0.)

Background  Shoulder dystocia occurs when the fetal head delivers, but the shoulder is lodged behind the pubic symphysis. Training for these emergency deliveries is not optimized, and litigation can occur around a shoulder dystocia delivery. Objective  Evaluate the ability of an outside observer to visually estimate the amount of traction applied to the fetal head during simulated deliveries complicated by shoulder dystocia. Study Design  Simulated deliveries with an objective measurement of traction were randomly organized for estimation of traction applied. Videos show providers applying a "normal" (75 N) and "excessive" (150 N) amount of force in both a "calm" and "stressed" delivery. Results  Fifty participants rated the amount of force applied. Observers estimated traction, on a scale from 1 to 5, higher in the 150-N deliveries as compared with 75-N deliveries ("calm" environment: 3.1 vs. 2.8, p  < 0.001; and "stressed" environment: 3.2 vs. 2.8, p  < 0.001). Only 15% of observers rated force "above average" or "excessive" in a "calm" environment, as opposed to 30% of observers in the "stressed" environment. Conclusion  Observers are not able to determine when "excessive force" is used and are twice as likely to overestimate the force applied to a fetal head when an average amount of force is used and the delivery environment is stressful. Precis  Observers are unable to determine when excessive traction is applied to the fetal head during simulated deliveries complicated by shoulder dystocia.