Search

Background: Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) individuals with cancer have specific and unique health issues and needs. Reports persist of inequalities in the care provided for these patients, making it important to assess the attitudes and knowledge of LGBTQ needs among those who provide care., Materials and Methods: The European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) and the European Society for Paediatric Oncology (SIOP Europe) Adolescents and Young Adults Working Group designed this survey comprising 67 questions covering demographics, knowledge, and education of LGBTQ health needs, and attitudes regarding LGBTQ patients with cancer., Results: Among the 672 respondents, a majority do not ask about sexual orientation and gender identity during first visit (64% and 58%, respectively). Only a minority of the respondents considered themselves well informed regarding gay/lesbian and transgender patients' health (44% and 25%, respectively) and psychosocial needs (34%). There was high interest in receiving education regarding the unique health needs of LGBTQ patients (73%)., Conclusions: Survey respondents indicated a willingness to provide care to LGBTQ patients, but a lack of confidence in the knowledge of the health issues and needs of LGBTQ individuals. Lack of training provided in medical schools and postgraduate training programmes and strong interest for additional education on these issues were reported., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Background: The European Society for Medical Oncology Precision Medicine Working Group (ESMO PMWG) was reconvened to update its 2018/19 recommendations on follow-up of putative germline variants detected on tumour-only sequencing, which were based on an analysis of 17 152 cancers., Methods: We analysed an expanded dataset including 49 264 paired tumour-normal samples. We applied filters to tumour-detected variants based on variant allele frequency, predicted pathogenicity and population variant frequency. For 58 cancer-susceptibility genes, we then examined the proportion of filtered tumour-detected variants of true germline origin [germline conversion rate (GCR)]. We conducted subanalyses based on the age of cancer diagnosis, specific tumour types and 'on-tumour' status (established tumour-gene association)., Results: Analysis of 45 472 nonhypermutated solid malignancy tumour samples yielded 21 351 filtered tumour-detected variants of which 3515 were of true germline origin. 3.1% of true germline pathogenic variants were absent from the filtered tumour-detected variants. For genes such as BRCA1, BRCA2 and PALB2, the GCR in filtered tumour-detected variants was >80%; conversely for TP53, APC and STK11 this GCR was <2%., Conclusion: Strategic germline-focused analysis can prioritise a subset of tumour-detected variants for which germline follow-up will produce the highest yield of most actionable true germline variants. We present updated recommendations around germline follow-up of tumour-only sequencing including (i) revision to 5% for the minimum per-gene GCR, (ii) inclusion of actionable intermediate penetrance genes ATM and CHEK2, (iii) definition of a set of seven 'most actionable' cancer-susceptibility genes (BRCA1, BRCA2, PALB2, MLH1, MSH2, MSH6 and RET) in which germline follow-up is recommended regardless of tumour type., Competing Interests: Disclosure AGe reports receipt of honoraria for participation in advisory board from AstraZeneca, receipt of honoraria as invited speaker from GSK and receipt of honoraria for performing editorial and research review from Roche. HH reports receipt of honoraria for participation in advisory board from AstraZeneca and nonfinancial interest for leadership role as Chair of the UK Cancer Genetics Group. KS reports receipt of honoraria for providing expert testimony from Axa-PPP and receipt of honoraria as invited speaker from Everything Genetic, Merck, Pfizer. AK reports receipt of honoraria as invited speaker from AstraZeneca, receipt of honoraria for professional service agreement with HCA Healthcare and owning stocks/shares in Perci Health. CBW reports receipt of honoraria for participation in advisory board from BMS, Celgene, Rafael, RedHill, Roche, Shire/Baxalta; receipt of honoraria for providing expert testimony from Janssen; receipt of honoraria as invited speaker from Amgen, Bayer, BMS, Celgene, Chugai, Falk, GSK, Janssen, Merck, MSD, Roche, Servier, Sirtex and Taiho; receipt of travel support from Bayer, Celgene, RedHill, Roche, Servier and Taiho; receipt of personal and institutional research grant with no financial interest from Roche and nonfinancial interest as officer in the AIO – Arbeitsgemeinschaft Internistische Onkologie. EC reports receipt of honoraria for participation in advisory board from Astellas, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Janssen, MSD and Pfizer; receipt of honoraria as invited speaker from Astellas, AstraZeneca, Clovis, Janssen and Pfizer; receipt of honoraria for writing engagement from Pfizer; institutional funding from AstraZeneca and Pfizer; research grants to institution from Bayer and Janssen and institutional financial interest as local principal investigator from Janssen and Pfizer. JR reports receipt of honoraria for participation in advisory board from Ellipses Pharma, iOnctura SA, Kelun Pharmaceuticals/KLUS Pharma, Molecular Partners and Peptomyc; receipt of institutional research grant with no financial interest for clinical research from Aadi Bioscience, Amgen, Bicycle Therapeutics, BioMed Valley Discoveries, Cellestia, Curis, Deciphera, ForeBio, Hutchison MediPharma, Ideaya, Linnaeus Therapeutics, Loxo Oncology, Merus, Mirati, Nuvation, Roche Pharmaceuticals, Taiho and Tango Therapeutics; receipt of institutional research grant with no financial interest for research funding/clinical research from Hummingbird and Yingli; receipt of institutional research grant with no financial interest for research funding from Vall d’Hebron Institute of Oncology/Cancer Core Europe; receipt of institutional nonfinancial interest for clinical research from Bayer, BioAtla, CytomX, Genmab, GlaxoSmithKline, Kelun-Biotech, Novartis, Pfizer, Spectrum Pharmaceuticals, Symphogen and Takeda-Millennium; receipt of institutional financial interest for research funding from Black Diamond, Blueprint Medicines, Merck Sharp & Dohme; receipt of consultancy fees from Boxer Capital, LLC and Tang Advisors, LLC; receipt of travel reimbursement from the European Society for Medical Oncology and reports academic collaborations with Chinese University of Hong Kong, VHIO/Ministerio De Empleo Y Seguridad Social. JM reports receipt of honoraria for participation in advisory board from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Clovis Oncology, Janssen and Roche; receipt of honoraria as invited speaker from AstraZeneca, Guardant Health and MSD; no financial interest for serving as a steering committee member from AstraZeneca and Pfizer Oncology; receipt of research grant to institution from AstraZeneca and Pfizer Oncology and nonfinancial interest for receipt of product samples, access to drugs in early development for preclinical testing from AstraZeneca. GJB reports receipt of honoraria as invited speaker from AstraZeneca. MFB reports receipt of honoraria for participation in advisory board from Eli Lilly and PetDx. CT reports receipt of honoraria for participation in advisory board from Roche and receipt of honoraria as invited speaker from AstraZeneca. All remaining authors have declared no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Background: Cancer epidemiology is unique in adolescents and young adults (AYAs; aged 15-39 years). The European Society for Medical Oncology/European Society for Paediatric Oncology (ESMO/SIOPE) AYA Working Group aims to describe the burden of cancers in AYAs in Europe and across European Union (EU) countries., Patients and Methods: We used data available on the Global Cancer Observatory. We retrieved crude and age-standardised (World Standard Population) incidence and mortality rates. We reported about AYA cancer burden in Europe and between 28 EU member states. We described incidence and mortality for all cancers and for the 13 cancers most relevant to the AYA population., Results: Incidence and mortality varied widely between countries with the highest mortality observed in Eastern EU countries. Cancers of the female breast, thyroid and male testis were the most common cancers across countries followed by melanoma of skin and cancers of the cervix. Variations in cancer incidence rates across different populations may reflect different distribution of risk factors, variations in the implementation or uptake of screening as well as overdiagnosis. AYA cancer mortality disparities may be due to variation in early-stage diagnoses, different public education and awareness of cancer symptoms, different degrees of access or availability of treatment., Conclusions: Our results highlight the future health care needs and requirements for AYA-specialised services to ensure a homogeneous treatment across different countries as well as the urgency for preventive initiatives that can mitigate the increasing burden., Competing Interests: Disclosure DS reports receipt of honoraria for providing academic peer review for research programme from French INCa, non-financial interest for advisory role in the clinical reference group advising NHS England about cancer policy in children and young people and non-remunerated membership of the Association of Cancer Physicians of the UK, SIOP Europe Adolescent Cancer Committee; IBS reports receipt of honoraria for participation in Advisory Board from Roche, receipt of honoraria as invited speaker from AstraZeneca, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, receipt of personal and institutional financial interest as local PI from Novartis, Roche, non-financial interest for serving as local PI in EORTC Breast Group, OncoDistinct studies and non-remunerated advisory role in the Ethical Committee Serbia, National Agency for Drug Registration Serbia, the Working Group for Oncology of the Ministry of Health Serbia; NG reports receipt of honoraria to institution for participation in Advisory Board from Y-mAbs Therapeutics, receipt of financial support to institution from Eisai for covering travel expenses and registration fees as invited speaker at international meeting for the presentation of the results from the studies as international PI, receipt of consultancy fee to institution from Ipsen, non-remunerated Co-chair of the Fostering Age inclusive Research (FAIR) trial group of ACCELERATE; non-remunerated member of the Executive Committee of EEC (Euro-Wing Consortium), non-financial interest for leadership role as Chair of the FOSTER Consortium (Fight Osteosarcoma Through European Research) and non-remunerated member of GO-AJA, SFCE, SIOP Europe; FP reports receipt of honoraria for participation in Advisory Board from Roche Diagnostics, receipt of honoraria for providing expert testimony from Ipsen, Merck and non-financial interest for leadership role as Scientific Director of the European School of Oncology; ATo reports receipt of honoraria for participation in Advisory Board from MSD, AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Eli Lilly, receipt of honoraria as invited speaker from Eli Lilly, Novartis and non-remunerated member of AIOM; KS reports receipt of honoraria for participation in Advisory Board from Bayer, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Roche, non-financial interest for leadership role in PanCare, SPOG, SSPHO and non-remunerated member of Board of Directors of SIOP Europe; GM reports receipt of honoraria for participation in Advisory Board from BMS, Janssen, Roche, Takeda, and receipt of honoraria as invited speaker from Amgen, AstraZeneca, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer; SB reports receipt of honoraria for participation in Advisory Board from Bayer Healthcare, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly, Hofmann La Roche, MAP-Biopharma; non-financial interest as principal investigator of the Bayer’s larotrectinib study; and non-remunerated member of the European Musculoskeletal Oncology Society (EMSOS), German Pediatric Oncology Society (GPOH); ES reports receipt of honoraria for participation in Advisory Board from AstraZeneca A.E., AstraZeneca UK Ltd., Gilead Sciences Hellas, Merck, Sharp & Dohme, Pfizer Hellas, receipt of honoraria as invited speaker from Amgen Hellas, Pfizer Hellas, receipt of honoraria for providing expert testimony from Ipsen and non-remunerated member of Board of Directors of Hellenic Oncology Research Group, Hellenic Society of Medical Oncology. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Background: The landscape of clinical trials testing risk-adapted modulations of cancer treatments is complex. Multiple trial designs, endpoints, and thresholds for non-inferiority have been used; however, no consensus or convention has ever been agreed to categorise biomarkers useful to inform the treatment intensity modulation of cancer treatments., Methods: An expert subgroup under the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) Precision Medicine Working Group shaped an international collaborative project to develop a classification system for biomarkers used in the cancer treatment de-intensification, based on a tiered approach. A group of disease-oriented clinical, translational, methodology and public health experts, and patients' representatives provided an analysis of the status quo, and scanned the horizon of ongoing clinical trials. The classification was developed through multiple rounds of expert revisions and inputs., Results: The working group agreed on a univocal definition of treatment de-intensification. Evidence of reduction in the dose-density, intensity, or cumulative dose, including intermittent schedules or shorter treatment duration or deletion of segment(s) of the standard regimens, compound(s), or treatment modality must be demonstrated, to define a treatment de-intensification. De-intensified regimens must also portend a positive impact on toxicity, quality of life, health system burden, or financial toxicity. ESMO classification categorises the biomarkers for treatment modulation in three tiers, based on the level of evidence. Tier A includes biomarkers validated in prospective, randomised, non-inferiority clinical trials. The working group agreed that in non-inferiority clinical trials, boundaries are highly dependent upon the disease scenario and endpoint being studied and that the absolute differences in the outcomes are the most relevant measures, rather than relative differences. Biomarkers tested in single-arm studies with a threshold of non-inferiority are classified as Tier B. Tier C is when the validation occurs in prospective-retrospective quality cohort investigations., Conclusions: ESMO classification for the risk-guided intensity modulation of cancer treatments provides a set of evidence-based criteria to categorise biomarkers deemed to inform de-intensification of cancer treatments, in risk-defined patients. The classification aims at harmonising definitions on this matter, therefore offering a common language for all the relevant stakeholders, including clinicians, patients, decision-makers, and for clinical trials., Competing Interests: Disclosure HB reports non-remunerated activities as a principal investigator (PI) within grant for clinical research from the National Cancer Institute, and is a non-remunerated member of Board of Directors in the Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology; LC reports receipt of institutional research funding from AbbVie, Immunomedics, NanoString Technologies, Novartis, Seattle Genetics, Syndax, Veracyte, advisory role in Aptitude Health, AstraZeneca/Daiichi Sankyo, Exact Sciences, G1 Therapeutics, Genentech/Roche, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, and Sanofi; SD reports receipt of honoraria for participation in Advisory Board from AstraZeneca, Cellectis, Isis/Servier, Novartis, Orion, Pierre Fabre, Rappta, Sanofi, receipt of honoraria as invited speaker from AstraZeneca, Exact Sciences, Eli Lilly, Merck Sharp & Dohme (MSD), Pfizer, Seagen, institutional financial interest for research as a Steering Committee Member from AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb (BMS), Pfizer, Puma, Roche/Genentech, Sanofi, institutional research funding from GE, institutional financial interest for clinical research funding as a coordinating PI from Taiho, institutional financial interest as a local PI from Orion, and a non-remunerated member of Board of Directors of the Société Française de Sénologie et Pathologie Mammaire; NH reports receipt of honoraria for participation in Advisory Board from Aptitude Health, AstraZeneca, Daiichi Sankyo, Eli Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sandoz-Hexal, Seattle Genetics, receipt of honoraria as invited speaker from Art Tempi, AstraZeneca, Daiichi Sankyo, Eli Lilly, Medscape, MSD, Novartis, Onkowissen, Pierre Fabre, Roche, Seattle Genetics, receipt of honoraria from West German Study Group (WSG) (husband), ownership interest in West German Study Group, institutional research funding from AstraZeneca, BMS, Daiichi Sankyo, Eli Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Odonate, Palleos, Pierre Fabre, Roche, Seattle Genetics, TRIO, WSG, a member of German AGO Breast Guideline Committee, a member of European School of Oncology/College of the European School of Oncology Breast Cancer Educational Programmes, Editor-in-Chief of Breast Care journal; DH reports receipt of honoraria for consulting in Advisory Board from Agendia, BioVeca, Cellworks, Cepheid, Epic Sciences, Freenome, L-Nutra, OncoCyte, Turnstone Biologics, owns stock shares in Inbiomotion SL, receipt of royalties from an institutional patent on which he is named investigator from Menarini Silicon Biosystems, institutional sponsored laboratory research as a coordinating PI from AstraZeneca, Pfizer, institutional sponsored laboratory and clinical research as a coordinating PI from Menarini Silicon Biosystems, non-remunerated activities as a past president and past member of Board of Directors of ASCO, non-remunerated Chair of Translational Research Advisory Committee in EORTC, and a non-remunerated member of the ESMO Working Group; KK reports receipt of honoraria for participation in Advisory Board from 4D Pharma, AstraZeneca, Cyclacel, Daiichi Sankyo, Eisai, Eli Lilly, Immunomedics, Merck, Novartis, OncoSec, Pfizer, Puma, Seattle Genetics, holding stocks/shares from Grail, spouse employment in Grail, no financial interest to institution as local PI from Acetylon, Amgen, Calithera, CytomX Therapeutics, Eli Lilly, Genentech, Immunomedics, Incyte, Novartis, Pfizer, Seattle Genetics, Zentalis, participation in Steering Committee of Ambrx, AstraZeneca, Genentech, Immunomedics, and support for attending meetings and/or travel from AstraZeneca, Eli Lilly, and Pfizer; LP reports receipt of honoraria for participation in Advisory Board and trial Steering Committee from AstraZeneca, Merck, honoraria for participation in Advisory Board from Novartis, Pfizer, Roche Genentech, no financial interest for clinical trial support to institution as local PI from AstraZeneca, Seagen, no financial interest for clinical trial support to institution as trial chair from Merck, Pfizer, research grant to institution from BMS, and no financial interest for advisory role in Breast Cancer Research Foundation, as a member of the scientific Advisory Board of Pfizer, for product samples, material transfer agreement; MR reports receipt of honoraria for participation in Advisory Board from BMS, Tolmar Pharmaceuticals, honoraria as invited speaker from WebMD, institutional financial interest for investigator-initiated clinical trials supported or drug supply from AstraZeneca, Roche, research grant to institution from Bayer, BMS, institutional financial interest for investigator-initiated clinical trials supported by Ipsen, Novartis, Pfizer, TerSera, and non-financial interest for advisory role from BMS; IS reports receipt of honoraria as invited speaker from Myriad Genetics and Nanostring Technologies; TS reports receipt of honoraria for participation in Advisory Board as a member of Patient Advisory Board from Pfizer and Roche; JS reports receipt of honoraria for participation in Advisory Board from Arvinas, AstraZeneca, Certara, Eisai, GlaxoSmithKline, honoraria as a Data and Safety Monitoring Board member from BMS, Novartis, Roche, and no financial interest to institution as coordinating PI from Merck, Olema, Radius Pharmaceuticals; GC reports receipt of honoraria for participation in Advisory Board from AstraZeneca, BMS, Daiichi Sankyo, Ellipsis, Exact Sciences, Lilly, Merck, Pfizer, Roche, Veracyte, receipt of honoraria as invited speaker from AstraZeneca, Daiichi Sankyo, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, receipt of honoraria for writing engagement from Pfizer, institutional research grant for investigator-initiated clinical trial from Merck, institutional funding for conduct of phase I studies from Astellas, AstraZeneca, Blueprint Medicine, BMS, Daiichi Sankyo, Kymab, Novartis, Philogen, Roche, Sanofi, non-remunerated activities as an officer of the Italian National Health Council, non-remunerated advisory role as a member of the Scientific Council of Europa Donna, non-remunerated advisory role in Fondazione Beretta, and non-remunerated member of Board of Directors of the Lega Italiana Lotta ai Tumori; FA reports receipt of institutional research grants from AstraZeneca, Daiichi Sankyo, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, and being a founder of Pegacsy. DT has been a past consultant for World Health Organization, noncommunicable diseases, cancer management team. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Background: With the implementation of multidisciplinary treatment and development of multiple novel anticancer drugs in parallel with expanding knowledge of supportive and palliative care, a need for separate training and specialisation in medical oncology emerged. A Global Curriculum (GC) in medical oncology, developed and updated by a joint European Society for Medical Oncology/American Society of Clinical Oncology (ESMO/ASCO) GC Task Force/Working Group (GC WG), greatly contributed to the recognition of medical oncology worldwide., Material and Methods: ESMO/ASCO GC WG carried out a global survey on medical oncology recognition and GC adoption in 2019., Results: Based on our survey, medical oncology is recognised as a separate specialty or sub-specialty in 47/62 (75%) countries participating in the survey; with a great majority of them (39/47, 83%) recognising medical oncology as a standalone specialty. Additionally, in 9 of 62 (15%) countries, medical oncology is trained together with haematology as a specialty in haemato-oncology or together with radiotherapy as a specialty in clinical oncology. As many as two-thirds of the responding countries reported that the ESMO/ASCO GC has been either fully or partially adopted or adapted in their curriculum. It has been adopted in a vast majority of countries with established training in medical oncology (28/41; 68%) and adapted in 12 countries with mixed training in haemato-oncology, clinical oncology or other specialty responsible for training on systemic anticancer treatment., Conclusions: With 75% of participating countries reporting medical oncology as a separate specialty or sub-specialty and as high as 68% of them reporting on GC adoption, the results of our survey on global landscape are reassuring. Despite a lack of data for some regions, this survey represents the most comprehensive and up-to-date information about recognition of medical oncology and GC adoption worldwide and will allow both societies to further improve the dissemination of the GC and global recognition of medical oncology, thus contributing to better cancer care worldwide., Competing Interests: Disclosure TC reports receipt of honoraria for participation in Advisory Board of Boehringer Ingelheim, Takeda, receipt of honoraria as invited speaker from MSD, Pfizer, Roche, institutional financial support for research from Merck Sharp & Dohme (MSD); MK reports receipt of honoraria for consulting or advisory role from Biocept, participating in speakers' bureau of Astellas Pharma, Genentech, Roche, Sanofi, Lilly, Bayer, Medivation, Astellas, Novartis, Bristol-Myers Squibb (BMS), Janssen Oncology, Pfizer, MSD, institutional research funding from Genentech, Roche, Merck Serono, covered travel and accommodations expenses by Genentech, Bayer, Medivation, Astellas, Sanofi, Novartis, BMS, Janssen Oncology, Pfizer, MSD; PÖ reports receipt of grants and personal fees from Roche, Merck, Sanofi Oncology, Amgen, Bayer, Eli Lilly, Nordic Drugs, and personal fees from Baxalta/Shire; AA reports receipt of honoraria for participation in Advisory Board of Roche, Pfizer, Eli Lilly and Company, Eisai, Novartis, MSD and BMS; NE-S reports receipt of honoraria from Roche, Novartis, MSD Oncology, AstraZeneca, Lilly, Pfizer, research funding (to Institution) from GlaxoSmithKline, Roche, Novartis; FL reports receipt of honoraria for participation in Advisory Board from Amgen, Astellas, Bayer, Beigene, BMS, Eli Lilly, MSD, Roche, Zymeworks, receipt of honoraria as invited speaker from AstraZeneca, BMS, Eli Lilly, Imedex, Medscape, MedUpdate, MerckSerono, MSD, Promedicis, Roche, Servier, StreamedUp!, receipt of honoraria for expert testimony from Biontech, Elsevier, receipt of honoraria for writing engagement from Deutscher Ärzteverlag, Iomedico, Springer-Nature, receipt of institutional research grant from BMS; PR reports receipt of honoraria for participation in Advisory Board of Blueprint Medicines, BMS, Merck, MSD, Pierre Fabre, Sanofi, receipt of honoraria as invited speaker from BMS, Merck, MSD, Novartis, Pierre Fabre, Sanofi, institutional research grants from BMS, Pfizer; AT reports receipt of honoraria for participation in Advisory Board from Merck, receipt of honoraria as invited speaker from AstraZeneca, Eli Lilly, Merck, Pfizer; HW reports receipt of honoraria to institution for participation in Advisory Board of AstraZeneca, Biocartis, Daiichi Sankyo, Eisai, KCE, Lilly, Novartis, Orion Corporation, Pfizer, PSI Cro AG, Puma Biotechnology, Roche, Sirtex, institutional research grants from Novartis, Roche, covered travel and accommodations expenses by Pfizer, Roche. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

It is well recognised that adolescents and young adults (AYA) with cancer have inequitable access to oncology services that provide expert cancer care and consider their unique needs. Subsequently, survival gains in this patient population have improved only modestly compared with older adults and children with cancer. In 2015, the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) and the European Society for Paediatric Oncology (SIOPE) established the joint Cancer in AYA Working Group in order to increase awareness among adult and paediatric oncology communities, enhance knowledge on specific issues in AYA and ultimately improve the standard of care for AYA with cancer across Europe. This manuscript reflects the position of this working group regarding current AYA cancer care, the challenges to be addressed and possible solutions. Key challenges include the lack of specific biological understanding of AYA cancers, the lack of access to specialised centres with age-appropriate multidisciplinary care and the lack of available clinical trials with novel therapeutics. Key recommendations include diversifying interprofessional cooperation in AYA care and specific measures to improve trial accrual, including centralising care where that is the best means to achieve trial accrual. This defines a common vision that can lead to improved outcomes for AYA with cancer in Europe., Competing Interests: Funding The European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) (no grant number) and the European Society for Paediatric Oncology (SIOPE) (no grant number) were the legal sponsors of this position paper. No research funding for the meetings or manuscript preparation was received from any third parties. Disclosure DS reports receipt of research grants from Teenage Cancer Trust. FAP reports personal financial interest as a Scientific Director at the European School of Oncology; receipt of lecture/presentation fees from Prime Oncology and Takeda; receipt of honoraria for advisory board participation/advisory services from Roche, AstraZeneca, Clovis and Ipsen. LF reports receipt of funding from Teenage Cancer Trust. IB-S reports receipt of speaker fees from Roche, Novartis and Pfizer; direct research funding as Principal Investigator from Roche; financial support to institution for clinical trials from Roche. OS reports receipt of honoraria for advisory board participation from Genuity Science. LH reports receipt of speaker fees from Roche. WTAvdG reports receipt of research funding from Novartis, honoraria for advisory board from Bayer and consultancy fees from SpringWorks, all to her institutes. SB reports receipt of honoraria for advisory board participation from Pfizer, Bayer, Lilly, Novartis and Isofol. GM reports receipt of speakers fees from AstraZeneca, Roche, MSD, BMS, Pfizer, Takeda, Janssen, Novartis and Sanofi; receipt of consultancy fees from AstraZeneca, Roche, MSD, BMS, Novartis and Sanofi; direct research funding as Principal Investigator from AstraZeneca, Novartis and MSD; financial support to institution for clinical trials from AstraZeneca, Novartis and MSD. ES reports receipt of honoraria for the provision of advisory services from Roche Hellas, BMS, Pfizer Hellas, AstraZeneca, Amgen Hellas and Dimiourgiki Farmakeutikon Ypiresion AE; receipt of research funding from Astellas Pharma; travel and education support from Roche Hellas, Pfizer Hellas, Astellas Pharma, Novartis (Hellas), MSD Greece and Enorasis. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Next-generation sequencing (NGS) allows sequencing of a high number of nucleotides in a short time frame at an affordable cost. While this technology has been widely implemented, there are no recommendations from scientific societies about its use in oncology practice. The European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) is proposing three levels of recommendations for the use of NGS. Based on the current evidence, ESMO recommends routine use of NGS on tumour samples in advanced non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), prostate cancers, ovarian cancers and cholangiocarcinoma. In these tumours, large multigene panels could be used if they add acceptable extra cost compared with small panels. In colon cancers, NGS could be an alternative to PCR. In addition, based on the KN158 trial and considering that patients with endometrial and small-cell lung cancers should have broad access to anti-programmed cell death 1 (anti-PD1) antibodies, it is recommended to test tumour mutational burden (TMB) in cervical cancers, well- and moderately-differentiated neuroendocrine tumours, salivary cancers, thyroid cancers and vulvar cancers, as TMB-high predicted response to pembrolizumab in these cancers. Outside the indications of multigene panels, and considering that the use of large panels of genes could lead to few clinically meaningful responders, ESMO acknowledges that a patient and a doctor could decide together to order a large panel of genes, pending no extra cost for the public health care system and if the patient is informed about the low likelihood of benefit. ESMO recommends that the use of off-label drugs matched to genomics is done only if an access programme and a procedure of decision has been developed at the national or regional level. Finally, ESMO recommends that clinical research centres develop multigene sequencing as a tool to screen patients eligible for clinical trials and to accelerate drug development, and prospectively capture the data that could further inform how to optimise the use of this technology., Competing Interests: Disclosure JR: advisory: Merck Sharp & Dohme (MSD), Boehringer, Bristol-Myers Squibb (BMS), AstraZeneca, Roche; speaker's bureau: Pfizer; travel support: OSE Immunotherapeutics SA, BMS, AstraZeneca, Roche. JM: advisory board: Amgen, AstraZeneca, Clovis Oncology, Janssen, MSD and Roche-Foundation Medicine; research funding: AstraZeneca and Pfizer Oncology; principal investigator of several industry sponsored clinical trials. CBW: personal and speakers' fees, reimbursement for travel and accommodation and honoraria for participance in advisory boards from Bayer, Celgene, Ipsen, MedScape, Rafael Pharmaceuticals, RedHill, Roche, Servier, Shire/Baxalta and Taiho; scientific grant support by Roche. FB: personal fees from AstraZeneca, Bayer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Boehringer–Ingelheim, Eli Lilly Oncology, F. Hoffmann–La Roche Ltd, Novartis, Merck, MSD, Pierre Fabre, Pfizer and Takeda. MPL: research grants (to hospital): MSD, Astellas, JnJ, Sanofi; advice: Roche, Bayer, Amgen, JnJ, Sanofi, Servier, Pfizer, Incyte. NN: speaker's fee and/or advisory boards: Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Biocartis, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly, Ilumina, Incyte, MERCK, MSD, Qiagen, Roche, Thermofisher, Sanofi; institutional financial interests (financial support to research projects): AstraZeneca, Biocartis, BMS, Illumina, Merck, Qiagen, Roche, Sysmex, Thermofisher; non-financial interests: President of the International Quality Network for Pathology (IQN Path); President of the Italian Cancer Society (SIC). ASc: speakers bureau: Ypsen, Astra Zeneca, Amgen, MSD, GSK; consulting: INCYTE Biosciences. MR: consulting or advisory: AstraZeneca (uncompensated), Change Healthcare, Daiichi-Sankyo (uncompensated), Epic Sciences (uncompensated), Merck (uncompensated), Pfizer (uncompensated); research funding: AbbVie (institution), AstraZeneca (Institution), Invitae (Institution, in-kind), Merck (Institution), Pfizer (institution); travel, accommodation, expenses: AstraZeneca, Merck; editorial services: AstraZeneca, Pfizer. FM-B: consulting: Aduro BioTech Inc., Alkermes, DebioPharm, eFFECTOR Therapeutics, F. Hoffman-La Roche Ltd, Genentech Inc., IBM Watson, Jackson Laboratory, Kolon Life Science, OrigiMed, PACT Pharma, Parexel International, Pfizer Inc., Samsung Bioepis, Seattle Genetics Inc., Tyra Biosciences, Xencor, Zymeworks; advisory committee: Immunomedics, Inflection Biosciences, Mersana Therapeutics, Puma Biotechnology Inc., Seattle Genetics, Silverback Therapeutics, Spectrum Pharmaceuticals, Zentalis; sponsored research: Aileron Therapeutics, Inc., AstraZeneca, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceutical, Calithera Biosciences Inc., Curis Inc., CytomX Therapeutics Inc., Daiichi Sankyo Co. Ltd, Debiopharm International, eFFECTOR Therapeutics, Genentech Inc., Guardant Health Inc., Millennium Pharmaceuticals Inc., Novartis, Puma Biotechnology Inc., Taiho Pharmaceutical Co.; honoraria: Chugai Biopharmaceuticals, Mayo Clinic, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey; other (Travel Related): Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center. NW: research grant from Puma Biotechnology; scientific advisory board and stockholder for Relay Therapeutics; advisor to Eli Lilly. ASt: advisory board/speakers bureau: Astra Zeneca, Eli Lilly, Bayer, BMS, Illumina, Janssen, MSD, Pfizer, Roche, Seattle Genetics, Thermo Fisher; Grants: Bayer, BMS, Chugai. JB: travel support: BMS; consulting fees: BMS, MSD, Astellas. SM: statistical advice: IDDI and Janssen Cilag; Independent Data Monitoring Committee member: Hexal, Steba, IQVIA, Roche, Sensorion, Biophytis, Servier, Yuhan. IB: speaker’s fee: AstraZeneca. ER: board participation: AstraZeneca, BMS, Roche; travel funding: AstraZeneca, BMS. JSR-F: paid consultant: Goldman Sachs, REPARE Therapeutics, and Paige.AI; member of the scientific advisory board: REPARE Therapeutics, Paige.AI, and Volition Rx; member of the Board of Directors: Group Oncoclinicas; ad hoc member of the scientific advisory board: Roche Tissue Diagnostics, Roche, Genentech, Novartis, and Invicro; owns shares: REPARE Therapeutics. RD: advisory: Roche, Boehringer Ingelheim; speaker’s fee: Roche, Ipsen, Amgen, Servier, Sanofi, Merck Sharp & Dohme; research grants: Merck and Pierre Fabre. FA: research grants and talks/advisory boards compensate to the hospital: Roche, Pfizer, Novartis, AstraZeneca, Daiichi Sankyo, Lilly. All remaining authors have declared no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2020 European Society for Medical Oncology. All rights reserved.)

It is increasingly common in oncology practice to perform tumour sequencing using large cancer panels. For pathogenic sequence variants in cancer susceptibility genes identified on tumour-only sequencing, it is often unclear whether they are of somatic or constitutional (germline) origin. There is wide-spread disparity regarding both the extent to which systematic 'germline-focussed analysis' is carried out upon tumour sequencing data and for which variants follow-up analysis of a germline sample is carried out. Here we present analyses of paired sequencing data from 17 152 cancer samples, in which 1494 pathogenic sequence variants were identified across 65 cancer susceptibility genes. From these analyses, the European Society of Medical Oncology Precision Medicine Working Group Germline Subgroup has generated (i) recommendations regarding germline-focussed analyses of tumour-only sequencing data, (ii) indications for germline follow-up testing and (iii) guidance on patient information-giving and consent., (© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society for Medical Oncology.)

Background: Adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with cancer require dedicated management encompassing both adult and paediatric cancer services. Following a European survey, the European Society for Medical Oncology, the European Society for Paediatric Oncology and the Asian continental branch of International Society of Paediatric Oncology undertook a similar survey to assess AYA cancer care across Asia., Methods: A link to the online survey was sent to healthcare professionals (HCPs) in Asia interested in AYA cancer care. Questions covered the demographics and training of HCPs, their understanding of AYA definition, availability and access to specialised AYA services, the support and advice offered during and after treatment, and factors of treatment non-compliance., Results: We received 268 responses from 22 Asian countries. There was a striking variation in the definition of AYA (median lower age 15 years, median higher age 29 years). The majority of the respondents (78%) did not have access to specialised cancer services and 73% were not aware of any research initiatives for AYA. Over two-thirds (69%) had the option to refer their patients for psychological and/or nutritional support and most advised their patients on a healthy lifestyle. Even so, 46% did not ask about smokeless tobacco habits and only half referred smokers to a smoking cessation service. Furthermore, 29% did not promote human papillomavirus vaccination for girls and 17% did not promote hepatitis B virus vaccination for high-risk individuals. In terms of funding, 69% reported governmental insurance coverage, although 65% reported that patients self-paid, at least partially. Almost half (47%) reported treatment non-compliance or abandonment as an issue, attributed to financial and family problems (72%), loss of follow-up (74%) and seeking of alternative treatments (77%)., Conclusions: Lack of access to and suboptimal delivery of AYA-specialised cancer care services across Asia pose major challenges and require specific interventions., Competing Interests: Competing interests: CKL: Fees for Advisory Board from Amgen Asia. SB: Fees for Advisory Boards from Pfizer, Bayer, Lilly, Novartis, Isofol. LB: Fees for Advisory Board from Takeda. FAP: Fees from Roche, Astra Zeneca, Clovis and Ipsen. DS: Research support from the National Institute for Health Research, Cancer Research UK, the Teenage Cancer Trust, Pharmamar and AstraZeneca.

Background: In order to facilitate implementation of precision medicine in clinical management of cancer, there is a need to harmonise and standardise the reporting and interpretation of clinically relevant genomics data., Methods: The European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) Translational Research and Precision Medicine Working Group (TR and PM WG) launched a collaborative project to propose a classification system for molecular aberrations based on the evidence available supporting their value as clinical targets. A group of experts from several institutions was assembled to review available evidence, reach a consensus on grading criteria and present a classification system. This was then reviewed, amended and finally approved by the ESMO TR and PM WG and the ESMO leadership., Results: This first version of the ESMO Scale of Clinical Actionability for molecular Targets (ESCAT) defines six levels of clinical evidence for molecular targets according to the implications for patient management: tier I, targets ready for implementation in routine clinical decisions; tier II, investigational targets that likely define a patient population that benefits from a targeted drug but additional data are needed; tier III, clinical benefit previously demonstrated in other tumour types or for similar molecular targets; tier IV, preclinical evidence of actionability; tier V, evidence supporting co-targeting approaches; and tier X, lack of evidence for actionability., Conclusions: The ESCAT defines clinical evidence-based criteria to prioritise genomic alterations as markers to select patients for targeted therapies. This classification system aims to offer a common language for all the relevant stakeholders in cancer medicine and drug development.

The cancer burden is rising globally, exerting significant strain on populations and health systems at all income levels. In May 2017, world governments made a commitment to further invest in cancer control as a public health priority, passing the World Health Assembly Resolution 70.12 on cancer prevention and control within an integrated approach. In this manuscript, the 2016 European Society for Medical Oncology Leadership Generation Programme participants propose a strategic framework that is in line with the 2017 WHO Cancer Resolution and consistent with the principle of universal health coverage, which ensures access to optimal cancer care for all people because health is a basic human right. The time for action is now to reduce barriers and provide the highest possible quality cancer care to everyone regardless of circumstance, precondition or geographic location. The national actions and the policy recommendations in this paper set forth the vision of its authors for the future of global cancer control at the national level, where the WHO Cancer Resolution must be implemented if we are to reduce the cancer burden, avoid unnecessary suffering and save as many lives as possible., Competing Interests: Competing interests: AE: Currently conducting research sponsored by AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Celltrion, Novartis, Roche. JT: Advisory Boards for Amgen, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Chugai, Genentech, Lilly, MSD, Merck Serono, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, Symphogen, Taiho, and Takeda. FCi: Advisory Boards: Merck Serono, Amgen, Roche, Bayer, Lilly, Servier. Research funding: Bayer, Roche, Merck Serono. GP: Honorarium for advisory boards or speakers fee: Roche, Celgene, Shire, Merck, Amgen, Lilly, BMS, Servier, Taiho, Halozyme, Sanofi. PC: Honoraria for consultancy/advisory role and/or for lectures from: Bayer, Blueprint Medicines, Deciphera Pharmaceuticals, Eisai, Eli Lilly, Nektar Ther., Novartis, Pfizer, PharmaMar. At his institution, his Unit received funds for research from: AmgenDompé, Arog Pharmaceuticals, Bayer, Eisai, Eli Lilly, Daiichi Sankyo Pharma, Epizyme Inc., Novartis, PharmaMar. MS: Conducts research sponsored by Janssen Pharmaceuticals. Advisory Boards: BMS, Novartis, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Leo Pharma. Speaker bureau for BMA, Novartis. Travel funding: Novartis, BMS, Astellas, Ipsen. All other authors declare no competing interests related to this paper.

Introduction: Adolescents and young adults (AYA) with cancer require dedicated clinical management and care. Little is known about the training and practice of European healthcare providers in regard to AYA and the availability of specialised services., Methods: A link to an online survey was sent to members of the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) and the European Society for Paediatric Oncology (SIOPE). The link was also sent to ESMO National Representatives and circulated to other European oncology groups. Questions covered the demographics and clinical training of respondents, their definition of AYA, education about AYA cancer, access to specialised clinical and supportive care, research and further education. Data from Europe were analysed by region., Results: Three hundred tweenty two questionnaires were submitted and we focused on data from the 266 European healthcare professionals. Responses revealed considerable variation both within and between countries in the definition of AYA. Over two-thirds of respondents did not have access to specialised centres for AYA (67%), were not aware of research initiatives focusing on AYA with cancer (69%) and had no access to specialist services for managing the late effects of treatment (67%). The majority of the respondents were able to refer AYA patients to professional psychological support and specialised social workers. However, more than half had no access to an age-specialised nurse or specialised AYA education. Overall, 38% of respondents reported that their AYA patients did not have access to fertility specialists. This figure was 76% in Eastern Europe. Lack of specialised AYA care was particularly evident in Eastern and South-Eastern Europe., Conclusion: There is important underprovision and inequity of AYA cancer care across Europe. Improving education and research focused on AYA cancer care should be a priority., Competing Interests: Competing interests: DS: Research support from the National Institute for Health Research, Cancer Research UK, the Teenage Cancer Trust, Pharmamar and Astra-Zeneca. SB: Fees for Advisory Boards from Pfizer, Bayer, Lilly, Novartis, Isofol. FAP: Fees from Roche, Astra Zeneca, Clovis and Ipsen. ES, LB, SJ, KM, J-YD, GM, SE: No relevant disclosures to declare.

The European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) and the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) are publishing a new edition of the ESMO/ASCO Global Curriculum (GC) thanks to contribution of 64 ESMO-appointed and 32 ASCO-appointed authors. First published in 2004 and updated in 2010, the GC edition 2016 answers to the need for updated recommendations for the training of physicians in medical oncology by defining the standard to be fulfilled to qualify as medical oncologists. At times of internationalisation of healthcare and increased mobility of patients and physicians, the GC aims to provide state-of-the-art cancer care to all patients wherever they live. Recent progress in the field of cancer research has indeed resulted in diagnostic and therapeutic innovations such as targeted therapies as a standard therapeutic approach or personalised cancer medicine apart from the revival of immunotherapy, requiring specialised training for medical oncology trainees. Thus, several new chapters on technical contents such as molecular pathology, translational research or molecular imaging and on conceptual attitudes towards human principles like genetic counselling or survivorship have been integrated in the GC. The GC edition 2016 consists of 12 sections with 17 subsections, 44 chapters and 35 subchapters, respectively. Besides renewal in its contents, the GC underwent a principal formal change taking into consideration modern didactic principles. It is presented in a template-based format that subcategorises the detailed outcome requirements into learning objectives, awareness, knowledge and skills. Consecutive steps will be those of harmonising and implementing teaching and assessment strategies., Competing Interests: JBe received research support to Karolinska Institutet and University Hospital from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Merck, Roche and Sanofi-Aventis. JBu received travel accommodations from Genentech/Roche. FC received a consultant honoraria in Astellas/Medivation, AstraZeneca, Celgene, Daiitchi-Sankyo, Eisai, GE Oncology, Genentech, GlaxoSmithKline (GSK), Merck-Scharp, Merus BV, Novartis, Pfizer, Pierre-Fabre, Roche, Sanofi, Teva. HC has worked in a consulting or advisory role in Amgen received speakers’ bureau in Baxalta, Celgene and received research funding from Celgene. PC received honoraria for consultancy/advisory role and/or for lectures from Bayer, Blueprint Medicines, Eisai, Eli Lilly, Glaxo SK, Merck SD, Merck Serono, Nektar Ther., Novartis, Pfizer, PharmaMar. AC received honoraria from MerckSerono, Roche, Amgen, Bayer, Lilly and speakers’ bureau from Roche and MerckSerono. RC received research funding from Genentech/Roche, Puma Biotechnology, Novartis and travel, accommodations, expenses from Novartis. LDP received fees as consultant or for lectures (no speakers’ bureau) from F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Pfizer, Bristol Meyer Squibb, AstraZeneca, Qiagen, Boehringer Ingelheim. All fees were paid to Institution. MDS received honoraria and consultation fees from Amgen, Astellas, Bayer, Celgene, Dendreon, Eisai Inc, ESSA, Ferring, GSK, Janssen Cilag, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Pierre Fabre Oncologie, Roche, Sanofi Aventis, Shionogi, Synthon, Takeda, Teva/OncoGenex; received research grant from Pierre Fabre Oncologie. EGEdV received research grants to the institute from Roche/Genentech, Amgen, Novartis, Pieris, Servier, is part of data monitoring committee in Biomarin and of advisory board in Synthon. CD received (un)restricted research grants donated to the research institute from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Celgene, Eisai, Boehringer Ingelheim, Merck, MSD, Mundipharma, Novartis, Pfizer Corporation, PharmaMar, Pierre Fabre, Roche Austria, Sanofi-aventis, Takeda; received honoraria for consulting from AstraZeneca, Eli Lilly, Merck, Novartis Pharma, Roche Austria. DSD has worked in a consulting or advisory role for UpToDate and received research funding from Aeterna Zentaris (to Institution). LRD received research funding from GlaxoSmithKline (to Institution), Millennium (to Institution), Bristol-Myers Squibb (to Institution), Aeterna Zentaris (to Institution), Millenuim (to Institution) and has other relationship with Genentech. NES received honoraria from Roche, Novartis, MSD Oncology; received research funding from GlaxoSmithKline, Roche; received travel, accommodations, expenses from Novartis, Roche, Celgene. AE conduct research sponsored by Roche, GSK, Novartis, AstraZeneca, Celltrion, Apotex Inc. ME has stock and other ownership interests with Bristol-Myers Squibb, GE Healthcare, Nestle SA, Pfizer, CVS CAREMARK; has worked in a consulting or advisory role from Merck, Bristol-Myers Squibb, ALKERMES; received research funding from Altor BioScience, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck, Alkermes, Polynoma; received travel, accommodations, expenses from Myriad Genetics, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck. EF has worked as a consultant for Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly, Pfizer, Roche, BMS, MSD, Novartis; received speaker's bureau from Eli Lilly, BMS, Novartis. MFF has owned stock from Novartis. PKG research funding from Abbvie (to Institution) and Onyx (to Institution). AG has worked in a consulting or advisory role for Genentech/Roche (to Institution), Bayer (to Institution), Sanofi (to Institution), Bristol-Myers Squibb (to Institution), Lilly (to Institution), Boston Biomedical (to Institution), Amgen (to Institution); received research funding from Genentech/Roche (to Institution), Bayer (to Institution), Pfizer (to Institution), Eisai (to Institution), Sanofi (to Institution), Lilly (to Institution), Boston Biomedical (to Institution); received travel, accommodations, expenses from Genentech/Roche, Bayer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Boston Biomedical, Amgen. SMH has stock and other ownership interests with Liquid Biotech, USA; has patents, royalties, other intellectual property with Liquid Biotech, USA. JH received advisory board and speaker fee from Tesaro and honorarium from SOBI. DVJ has worked in a consulting or advisory role for Bayer. UK received honoraria from Amgen, BMS, GSK, Glycotope, MerckSerono, Merck/MSD, Pfizer; received research support from Pfizer, MerckSerono, Innate, Sirtec. RK conduct research supported by Roche; a member of speaker's bureau of Roche, Meda, Novartis. SK received research funding from Novartis (to Institution), Merck (to Institution), Threshold Pharmaceuticals (to Institution), Gilead Sciences (to Institution), Bayer/Onyx (to Institution); received travel, accommodation, expenses from Novartis. C-HK received honoraria from Merck/Darmstadt, Amgen. MK is on speakers’ bureau for Astellas Pharma, Genentech/Roche, Sanofi, Lilly, Bayer; received research funding from Genentech/Roche (to Institution) and Merck Serono (to Institution). H-JL has received honoraria from Merck Serono, Roche, Celgene, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim; has served in a consulting or advisory role for Merck Serono, Roche, Bayer; received travel, accommodations, expenses from Merck Serono, Bayer, Roche. LL has served as a consultant/advisory for EISAI, BMS, MSD, Merck-Serono, Boehringer Ingelheim, DEBIOPHARM, SOBI, Novartis, AstraZeneca, Bayer and Roche; received research funds to institute for clinical studies from EISAI, MSD, Merck-Serono, Boehringer Ingelheim, Novartis, AstraZeneca and Roche; received travel coverage for medical meetings from Merck-Serono, DEBIOPHARM, SOBI, Bayer. PJL received research funding from Novartis (to Institution), Celgene (to Institution), ImClone Systems (to Institution), Taiho Pharmaceutical (to Institution); has patents, royalties, other intellectual property US PPA/61/499,988 Gene Expression Analysis of Thymic Neoplasms Inventors Sunil Badve, Yesim Gokmen-Polar, Patrick Loehrer (to Institution). RIL has served in consulting or advisory role for Roche, Novartis, Janssen; received speakers’ bureau from Roche, Novartis, Janssen. MJM received research funding from Astex Pharmaceuticals (to Institution). TN has ownership interest with Bioclassifier LLC; has role for invention of PAM50 breast cancer assay, which has been licensed to NanoString technologies and being marketed as Prosigna; has served as a consultant for NanoString. KÖ received speaker bureau from Novartis, Ipsen. PÖ received consulting fees, honoraria, travel grants or lecturing fees from Amgen, Bayer, Baxalta, Celgene, EliLilly, Merck, Nordic Drugs, Prime Oncology, Sanofi Oncology. AP received honoraria and consultancy fee from Amgen, Novartis, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Genmab A/S, Celgene, Janssen-Cilag, Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Onyx Pharmaceuticals, Sanofi Aventis. MR received honoraria from AstraZeneca; has served in a consulting or advisory role for Bayer, Pfizer, McKesson; received research funding from AstraZeneca (to Institution), AbbVie (to Institution), Myriad Genetics (to Institution), Biomarin (to Institution); received travel, accommodations, expenses from AstraZeneca, Biomarin. LS has served in a consulting or advisory role for bioTheranostics. MS conduct research sponsored by AstraZeneca, Bayer, Eisai, Exelixis, Genzyme. H-JS is an advisor for Roche, Bayer. LS has served in leadership for Eviti; has served in a consulting or advisory role for Merck; has patents, royalties, other intellectual property; as Co-Editor-in-Chief of UpToDate, Oncology. JS is an employee of Genentech; received honoraria, speakers’ bureau, travel, accommodations, expenses from Genentech. CNS received honoraria or research grant from Novartis, GSK, Pfizer, Merck, Lilly, BMS, Astellas, Bayer, Janssen, Sanofi. FS received unrestricted industry grants for clinical research from Celgene, Fresenius, Helsinn; FS participates in Novartis-lead clinical trials and received punctual advisorship (boards, expert meetings) from Acacia, ACRAF, Amgen, Baxter, Celgene, Danone, Fresenius, GlaxoSmithKline, Grünenthal, Helsinn, ISIS Global, Millennium/Takeda, Mundipharma, Novartis, Novelpharm, Nycomed, Obexia, Otsuka, Ono, Pharm-Olam, Pfizer, Psioxus, PrIME, Santhera, Sunstone, Teva, Vifor. RS received honoraria or consulting fee (paid to institution) from Roche, Merck KGaA/EMD-Serono, MSD/Merck & Co, Pfizer, Ipsen Pharma, Novartis. JT has worked in a consultant/advisory role for Amgen, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Chugai, Lilly, MSD, Merck Serono, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, Symphogen, Taiho and Takeda. EV has stock and other ownership interests with McKesson; has worked in a consulting or advisory role for Abbvie, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Clovis Oncology, GeneCentric, Genentech, Merck, Synta, VentiRx, Eisai, Lilly, Transgene; received speakers’ bureau for Amgen; received research funding from Abbvie (to Institution), Bristol-Myers Squibb (to Institution), Gen Vec Inc, (to Institution), Sanofi (to Institution), Monsanto (to Institution), Cyclacel (to Institution); received travel, accommodations, expenses from Amgen. JSW has stock and other ownership interests with Altor BioScience, Celldex, cCam Biotherapeutics; received honoraria from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck, Genentech, Abbvie, AstraZeneca, Daiichi Sankyo, GlaxoSmithKline, Eisai, Altor BioScience, Lion Biotechnologies, Amgen, Roche, Ichor Medical Systems, Celldex, cCam Biotherapeutics, Pieris; has worked in a consulting or advisory role for Celldex, Ichor Medical Systems, cCam Biotherapeutics, Lion Biotechnologies, Pieris, Altor BioScience, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck, Genentech, Roche, Amgen, AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, Daiichi Sankyo, Abbvie, Eisai; received research funding from Bristol-Myers Squibb (to Institution), Merck (to Institution), GlaxoSmithKline (to Institution), Genentech (to Institution), Astellas Pharma (to Institution), Incyte (to Institution), Roche (to Institution), Novartis (to Institution); received travel, accommodations, expenses from Bristol-Myers Squibb, GlaxoSmithKline, Daiichi Sankyo, Pieris, cCam Biotherapeutics, Lion Biotechnologies, Roche, Celldex, Amgen, Merck, AstraZeneca, Genentech.

Purpose: To investigate the possible existence of increased nephrotoxicity caused by once-daily aminoglycosides in febrile neutropenic patients who were previously treated with cisplatin-based nephrotoxic chemotherapy., Methods: Thirty-one patients with metastatic tumors received chemotherapy and, as a result, developed febrile neutropenia. Patients were stratified with regard to chemotherapy with cisplatin (n=15) or without cisplatin (n=16). Both groups received i.v. empiric antibiotic treatment which included combinations of once-daily aminoglycosides (amikacin vs. gentamicin) with beta-lactams., Results: Increased nephrotoxicity due to administered aminoglycosides appeared significantly more frequently (p<0.05) in patients who received cisplatin-based chemotherapy. Increased nephrotoxicity differed significantly between various aminoglycosides regimens (p<0.05), being greater in the gentamicin group., Conclusion: These results showed that cisplatin-based chemotherapy followed by a once-daily aminoglycosides regimen caused increased renal toxicity, which was more pronounced in patients treated with gentamicin vs. those treated with amikacin.

Purpose: To compare a bi-weekly infusion of leucovorin (LV) 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) for 2 days, plus oxaliplatin (LV5- FU2-oxaliplatin) and LV5-FU2-cisplatin (CDDP) regimens with respect to toxicity, objective response rates, time to progression (TTP) and overall survival (OS) in patients with advanced gastric cancer., Patients and Methods: Patients received LV5-FU2- oxaliplatin (oxaliplatin 85 mg/m(2), day 1; folinic acid 200 mg/m(2), days 1-2; 5-FU 400 mg/m(2), i.v. bolus, days 1-2; 5-FU 600 mg/m(2), 22-hour continuous infusion, days 1-2) or LV5- FU2-CDDP (CDDP 50 mg/m(2), day 1; plus LV5-FU2). A total of 72 patients were enrolled into this study (36 vs. 36)., Results: A total of 305 cycles were administered in the LV5-FU2-oxaliplatin arm (median 8) and 272 cycles in the LV5-FU2-CDDP arm (median 8). Grades 3-4 toxicity were as follows (LV5-FU2-oxaliplatin %/LV5-FU2-CDDP %; p<0.05): neutropenia 5/49, thrombocytopenia 2/6, anemia 6/16 nausea/vomiting 2/15, and mucositis 0/3. Response rate of LV5-FU2-oxaliplatin was 41% (partial response/PR 41%, stable disease/SD 31%, progressive disease/PD 28%; 95% confidence internal/95% CI 27-58) and of LV5-FU2-CDDP was 25% (PR 25%, SD 36%, PD 39%; 95% CI 14-41; p =0.013). The median TTP of the patients in the LV5-FU2-oxaliplatin arm was 8 months and 6 months for those in the LV5- FU2-CDDP arm (p=0.073). The median survival time of the patients in the LV5-FU2-oxaliplatin arm was 10 months and 7 months for those in the LV5-FU2-CDDP arm (p=0.003)., Conclusion: Our study showed that oxaliplatin may be substituted for cisplatin with LV5-FU2 with favorable safety and efficacy profile. The encouraging results from our study support the effectiveness of oxaliplatin-fluoropyrimidine- containing chemotherapy in gastric cancer and could provide a new core on which to add other agents in future investigations.