Search

Body condition is increasingly used to assess the status of populations and as a proxy for individual fitness. A common, quick and non-invasive approach is to estimate condition from the relation between body length and mass. Among the methods developed for this purpose, the Scaled Mass Index (SMI) appears best suited for comparisons among populations. We assembled data from 17 populations of European green toads (Bufotes viridis) with the aim of devising a standard formula applicable for monitoring this species. The mean value of the exponents describing length–mass allometry in these samples was 3.0047. Hence, we propose using 3 as a scaling coefficient for calculating the SMI in green toads. From the contrast of SMI values for both sexes within populations, estimated with either the population-specific or the standard coefficient, we conclude that applying the standard formula not only facilitates comparisons among populations but may also help to avoid misinterpretation of variation within populations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Understanding animal space use and habitat needs is a vital requirement for effective conservation and management measures. Considering the multiple instances in which landscapes are anthropogenically altered, it becomes increasingly important to understand what the spatial requirements of an animal are. However, smaller animals, like lizards, require finer-scale assessments, which cannot always be easily made. Therefore, we calculated home ranges of Lacerta agilis using data collected by radio tracking. We then studied microhabitat preference using high-resolution maps generated from photographs taken by unmanned aerial vehicles. Overall, lizards in the selected area seem to favour home ranges that include blackberry brush while avoiding high vegetation and sand. They use other structures according to individual preferences or unstudied factors. Our study portrays an efficient method with high spatial resolution to assess small-vertebrate habitat preferences, which can in turn be used in planning population-specific habitat management or compensatory measures. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Chytridiomycosis, a disease induced by the chytrid fungi Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis (Bd) and B. salamandrivorans (Bsal), has strongly contributed to the ongoing worldwide amphibian conservation crisis. While Bd infection has caused amphibian declines for decades on several continents, Bsal is a novel threat to Central European salamanders and newts, being responsible for the collapse of Fire Salamander populations in the Netherlands, Belgium, and Germany. However, numerous other parasites causing harm to amphibians exist, yet have received much less attention than the chytrid fungi. The goal of the present study was to contribute to the understanding of declines of the Green Toad, Bufotes viridis, at its northwestern distribution border, in the area of Cologne, Germany. We combined the data from four years of Bd monitoring with a metabarcoding approach to detect other, mainly unicellular parasites, from amphibian feces and environmental samples, and also report results from Bsal testing in 2019. Skin swabs of approximately 280 amphibians were tested for Bd and 66 for Bsal, and 150 cloacal swabs and environmental samples from five sites were tested for other pathogens and parasites.We found Bd in all sampled locations with high prevalences and partly high individual infection loads but without clinical signs of chytridiomycosis. None of the samples tested for Bsal was positive for this pathogen. We further detected eight additional potential amphibian pathogens from fecal samples: three metamonads (Tritrichomonas augusta, Trichomitus batrachorum and Hexamita inflata), three ciliates (Balantidium duodeni, Nyctotherus cordiformis and N. hubeiensis), one stramenopile (Blastocystis sp.) and one metazoan (the nematode Rhabdias ranae). In the environmental samples, we detected OTUs of nine organisms potentially harmful for amphibians: Blastocystis sp., Hexamita inflata, Tritrichomonas augusta, Trichomitus batrachorum, two oomycetes (Leptolegnia sp., Saprolegnia sp.), two ichthyosporeans (Amphibiocystidium ranae, Anurofeca sp.) and the myxozoan Myxobolus sp. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The Green Toad (Bufotes viridis) in Germany is mostly confined to secondary habitats and is experiencing severe population declines especially at its northwestern range boundary in the city of Cologne. As a basis for conservation management of this species, viz. to investigate the status of the population structure, we used a library of over 15,000 short tandem repeats to establish a new set of 12 microsatellite markers for this species. We applied these markers to B. viridis individuals from six sampling sites in Cologne, and included outgroup samples from sites in northern and central Germany. The results suggest the sampled Cologne toads form four distinct populations, without an obvious distinction between sites east and west of the river Rhine. Only the green toads of three neighbouring sampling sites clustered as one population, supporting the initial hypothesis that individuals from proximate sampling sites are genetically more similar than those from more isolated sampling sites. However, mitochondrial DNA sequences revealed a haplotype east of the Rhine that was absent west of the river. Toads from the northernmost sampled population in Cologne "Ginsterpfad" were not genetically depauperate, indicating that the severe declines at this site did not lead to a loss of genetic variation and were not related to inbreeding. Some Ginsterpfad individuals were genetically highly distinct from others, which may be explained by human introduction. Despite the encountered population structure, the low number of private alleles in the populations west of the Rhine, and the uniformity in mitochondrial haplotypes with the exception of one deviant allele east of the Rhine, lead us to recommend a pragmatic approach for conservation management. We suggest to consider all Cologne Green toads as belonging to a single management unit, but propose that, wherever possible, populations east and west of the Rhine should not be mixed in reintroduction measures. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]