Search

With more disease- and symptom-specific measures available and research pointing to increased usefulness, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) can be routinely used in clinical care. PROMs increase efficiency in healthcare, improve the clinician-patient relationship, and increase patient satisfaction with their care. PROMs can be administered before, during, and after clinic visits using paper-and-pencil, mobile phones, tablets, and computers. Herein, we combine available literature with expert views to discuss overcoming barriers and helping dermatologists incorporate PROMs into routine patient-centered care. We believe dermatology patients will benefit from broader PROM implementation and routine clinical use. However, a few major barriers exist: (1) cost to implement the technology, (2) selecting the right PROMs for each disease, and (3) helping both patients and clinicians understand how PROMs add to and complement their current clinical experience. We provide recommendations to assist dermatologists when considering whether to implement PROMs in their practices.

Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) provide quantitative assessments of patients' experiences with their skin diseases. PROs are usually much more comprehensive than what can be gleaned from a brief clinical history and more informative than what dermatologists can gather on clinical examination. Correlations between PROs and clinician assessments (e.g., investigator global assessment, PASI) are poor to moderate at best, and therefore data from each source are not redundant and can complement one another. PROs should serve as skin vital signs in dermatology. PROs can offer snapshots of the intensity of a symptom as well as the effects of symptoms, emotions, and functioning on a patient's skin-related QOL. Just as clinicians obtain a baseline blood pressure before starting antihypertensives, dermatology-specific PROs serve as a baseline from which clinicians can monitor (even remotely) for improvement or side effects with treatment and for flares. Both PROs and conventional vital signs are usually normal. It is when they are abnormal or different than expected that they become informative. We conclude by offering a roadmap for investigators to conduct the next steps in PRO research necessary to establish guidelines for transitioning PROs from clinical research and trials to routine clinical use.

Objective: Combination topical clotrimazole/ betamethasone dipropionate (C-BM) contains a high-potency topical corticosteroid and is not infrequently prescribed for inappropriate patient groups and body sites. Use of C-BM can lead to inadequate clearance or exacerbation of fungal infections as well as cutaneous atrophy, striae, and other skin maladies. Methods: We performed a retrospective chart review of 1,978 clinical visits where C-BM was prescribed within the University of Utah Health system between 2014 and 2018 to better understand current prescribing patterns. Results: 1,974 prescriptions were written for C-BM. 91.6% of patients were at least the recommended age of 17 years. C-BM was most commonly prescribed for rashes of an inflammatory (42.2%) or fungal nature (38.1%). Clotrimazole/betamethasone dipropionate was prescribed for sensitive areas (face, axillae, groin or diaper region) in 48.9% of patients. Family medicine clinicians prescribed 58.3% of C-BM prescriptions, whereas dermatology clinicians accounted for 3.4%. Conclusion: We strongly recommend clinicians use alternative treatments for rashes or refer to dermatologists.

Outdoor recreation can lead to substantial sun exposure. Employees of outdoor recreation establishments with extended time outdoors have amplified cumulative exposure to ultraviolet (UV) radiation and an increased risk of skin cancer. The “Sun Safe on the Slopes” program was created by Huntsman Cancer Institute at the University of Utah and the Utah Cancer Action Network to address increased UV exposure and skin cancer risk with free skin cancer screenings, outreach, and prevention education to local ski resorts. Herein, we describe the processes and barriers to implementation of a ski resort skin screening and education program and our 5-year report of the experience and screening data. Nine free skin cancer screenings were held at Utah ski resorts between 2011 and 2016, resulting in the presumptive diagnosis of 38 skin cancers (9.6%) in 394 participants. Behavioral data collected from participants indicates suboptimal sun safety practices, including underuse of sunscreen and protective clothing. Ski resort employees who experience sun exposure during peak hours at high altitudes and UV reflection from the snow are at an increased risk of skin cancer. These data indicate a need for emphasis on sun safety education and screening and can serve as a model for future endeavors.