Search

Abstract Background Mixed data exist regarding the association between hyperglycemia and functional outcome after acute ischemic stroke when accounting for the impact of leptomeningeal collateral flow. We sought to determine whether collateral status modifies the association between treatment group and functional outcome in a subset of patients with large vessel occlusion enrolled in the Stroke Hyperglycemia Insulin Network Effort (SHINE) trial. Methods In this post-hoc analysis, we analyzed patients enrolled into the SHINE trial with anterior circulation large vessel occlusion who underwent imaging with CT angiography prior to glucose control treatment group assignment. The primary analysis assessed the degree to which collateral status modified the effect between treatment group and functional outcome as defined by the 90-day modified Rankin Scale score. Logistic regression was used to model the data, with adjustments made for thrombectomy status, age, post-perfusion thrombolysis in cerebral infarction (TICI) score, tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) use, and baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score. Five SHINE trial centers contributed data for this analysis. Statistical significance was defined as a p-value

Importance: Hyperglycemia during acute ischemic stroke is common and is associated with worse outcomes. The efficacy of intensive treatment of hyperglycemia in this setting remains unknown.Objectives: To determine the efficacy of intensive treatment of hyperglycemia during acute ischemic stroke.Design, Setting, and Participants: The Stroke Hyperglycemia Insulin Network Effort (SHINE) randomized clinical trial included adult patients with hyperglycemia (glucose concentration of >110 mg/dL if had diabetes or ≥150 mg/dL if did not have diabetes) and acute ischemic stroke who were enrolled within 12 hours from stroke onset at 63 US sites between April 2012 and August 2018; follow-up ended in November 2018. The trial included 1151 patients who met eligibility criteria.Interventions: Patients were randomized to receive continuous intravenous insulin using a computerized decision support tool (target blood glucose concentration of 80-130 mg/dL [4.4-7.2 mmol/L]; intensive treatment group: n = 581) or insulin on a sliding scale that was administered subcutaneously (target blood glucose concentration of 80-179 mg/dL [4.4-9.9 mmol/L]; standard treatment group: n = 570) for up to 72 hours.Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary efficacy outcome was the proportion of patients with a favorable outcome based on the 90-day modified Rankin Scale score (a global stroke disability scale ranging from 0 [no symptoms or completely recovered] to 6 [death]) that was adjusted for baseline stroke severity.Results: Among 1151 patients who were randomized (mean age, 66 years [SD, 13.1 years]; 529 [46%] women, 920 [80%] with diabetes), 1118 (97%) completed the trial. Enrollment was stopped for futility based on prespecified interim analysis criteria. During treatment, the mean blood glucose level was 118 mg/dL (6.6 mmol/L) in the intensive treatment group and 179 mg/dL (9.9 mmol/L) in the standard treatment group. A favorable outcome occurred in 119 of 581 patients (20.5%) in the intensive treatment group and in 123 of 570 patients (21.6%) in the standard treatment group (adjusted relative risk, 0.97 [95% CI, 0.87 to 1.08], P = .55; unadjusted risk difference, -0.83% [95% CI, -5.72% to 4.06%]). Treatment was stopped early for hypoglycemia or other adverse events in 65 of 581 patients (11.2%) in the intensive treatment group and in 18 of 570 patients (3.2%) in the standard treatment group. Severe hypoglycemia occurred only among patients in the intensive treatment group (15/581 [2.6%]; risk difference, 2.58% [95% CI, 1.29% to 3.87%]).Conclusions and Relevance: Among patients with acute ischemic stroke and hyperglycemia, treatment with intensive vs standard glucose control for up to 72 hours did not result in a significant difference in favorable functional outcome at 90 days. These findings do not support using intensive glucose control in this setting.Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01369069. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Hyperglycemia is common after acute ischemic stroke and is associated with worse outcome, but intensive glucose control has not improved outcome. There is also a racial disparity in outcome after stroke, with Black patients more likely to have functional impairment than whites. We aimed to evaluate if there were racial differences in outcomes in acute ischemic stroke patients treated with intensive glucose control.Methods: We performed a post-hoc analysis of the Stroke Hyperglycemia Insulin Network Effort (SHINE) trial to determine if Black patients had worse functional outcome than whites and if standard versus intensive glucose control modified that association. We included non-Hispanic white and Black patients. The primary outcome was excellent functional outcome (90-day modified Rankin Score of 0-1). To account for patient clustering by study site, we fit mixed-effects logistic regression models to our outcome and tested the interaction of treatment and race.Results: We included 895 patients, of which 304 (34%) were Black and 591 (66%) were white. The rate of excellent outcome was 31.6% in Black patients versus 41.0% in white patients (p=0.006). After adjusting for potential confounders, the odds ratio for excellent outcome in Black patients was 0.54 (95% CI 0.38-0.77). The interaction term between treatment and race was significant (p=0.067). In the intensive treatment arm, Black patients had a predicted probability of excellent outcome of 26.4% (20.1-32.8) versus 42.7% (37.6-47.9) for white patients (p<0.001), while in the standard treatment arm the difference was not significant.Conclusions: Black patients with acute ischemic stroke and hyperglycemia had worse functional outcome at 90 days than white patients, particularly if given intensive glucose control. These findings are from a post-hoc analysis and may be confounded, thus warrant additional study. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]