Search

Ewing sarcoma with renal localization is one of the rarest members of the Ewing sarcoma family with less than 200 cases reported in the Medline database. Considering the fact that the majority of data published on the Ewing sarcoma with neuroectodermal differentiation is obtained through a few case reports and case series, it becomes understandable why we currently have no universally accepted treatment regimens. Case summary: A 33-year-old patient presented to the Emergency Department with right lumbar pain following a mild trauma and an episode of macroscopic hematuria. Physical examination confirmed hematuria and flank pain and a palpable flank mass was identified. MRI showed a cystic lesion of the upper pole of the right kidney of 127/110/123 mm. After prior agreement of the multidisciplinary team, a 3D laparoscopic right radical nephrectomy was done. The histopathological diagnosis revealed an Ewing sarcoma with extensive neuroectodermal differentiation staged as pT3N1M0L1V2R0. Despite swift implementation of the chemotherapy protocol, the progression of the disease was quickly noted. Currently, one year after diagnosis, the disease is still progressing despite the chemotherapy treatment, the patient being a third line chemotherapy candidate. As renal localization of Ewing sarcoma with extensive neuroectodermal differentiation is extremely rare, multimodal treatment strategies must be established by a multidisciplinary team. Despite its aggressive biological behavior, a proper therapeutic management might increase patient life expectancy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) represents a rare endocrine malignancy being the second most aggressive endocrine cancer after anaplastic thyroid cancer. [1]. While most of them arise sporadically, up to 15% of adult ACC patients are related to germline mutations associated with familial cancer syndromes.[1,2]. Current treatment strategies include surgery as well as systemic therapy with mitotane and chemotherapy. Case report: A 60-year-old female patient with a family history of colon cancer, multinodular goiter, hypothyroidism treated with substitutive therapy, uterine fibroids, and hypertension, was diagnosed with adrenocortical carcinoma. No distant metastasis were present at the moment of diagnosis so an adrenalectomy was performed. Due to postoperative complications, a total nephrectomy was also needed. Adjuvant Mitotane treatment was given. A CT exam performed 5 months after the resection showed multiple pulmonary metastasis, a liver nodule and peritoneal carcinomatosis. The standard first-line chemotherapy of choice was Carboplatin and Etoposide. After completing 3 cycles of chemotherapy the imaging reassessment show the progression of liver and peritoneal lesions and the quasi-complete regression of lung lesions. Currently, the Mitotate treatment was stopped due to severe adverse reactions. Conclusions: Adrenocortical carcinoma is a rare endocrine malignancy with a poor prognosis. The recruitment of ACC patients for new clinical trials to investigate new treatment strategies is needed because currently, no significant therapeutic breakthrough is emerging. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim. The aim of our study was to assess the accuracy of a combination of digital mammography and breast ultrasonography in the prediction of response to neoadjuvant systemic treatment in breast cancer patients with different tumor subtypes. Methods. The study was designed as a retrospective diagnostic accuracy study. Stage I-III female breast cancer patients who received any type of neoadjuvant systemic treatment with radiological response assessment by both mammography and breast ultrasound and followed by surgical treatment in the breast and axilla were included in the study. The primary outcome was the diagnostic accuracy of combined modalities of mammography and breast ultrasonography for predicting the pathological complete response. On mammography and breast ultrasonography, the radiological response was categorized into complete response and non-complete response. Pathological complete response on surgical specimens was described based on current guidelines. True and false positive cases as well as true and false negative cases were counted and compared among patients with 4 different molecular subtypes. The diagnostic accuracy of combined imaging modalities was analyzed for positive and negative predictive values, sensitivity, and specificity rates. All rates were calculated according to the previously described formulas. Results. Eighty-one breast cancer cases were included in the study. Positive predictive values of imaging were 100%, 75%, 100%, and 83%, whereas negative predictive values were 67%, 75%, 100%, and 100% in patients with HR+/HER2-, HR+/HER2+, HR-/HER2+ and HR-/HER2- tumors, respectively. Sensitivity rates were found to be 98%, 90%, 100%, and 100%, whereas specificity rates were 100%, 50%, 100%, and 67% in patients with HR+/HER2-, HR+/HER2+, HR-/HER2+ and HR-/HER2- tumors, respectively. Conclusion. Digital mammography and breast ultrasonography as a combined modality seem to show the pathological complete response after neoadjuvant systemic treatment in HR+/HER2- breast cancer patients with a very high specificity rate. Therefore, these conventional tools may help surgeons to select patients who might benefit from loco-regional treatment de-escalation with higher accuracy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]