Search

Biochemical recurrence (BCR) is widely used as an early end point to assess treatment success and frequently prompts the initiation of secondary therapy after radical prostatectomy. We conducted an observational, ambispective study to evaluate BCR after robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) for clinically localized prostate cancer. We also analyzed correlation of BCR with pre-operative PSA level, D'Amico classification, pathological stage, post-operative GS, and positive surgical margins after RARP.A total of 90 patients with clinically localized carcinoma prostate (≤ T 2), who underwent RARP between April 2012 and April 2017 at our institute with 3 year of minimum follow-up were included in our study. Patients having locally advanced disease on clinical staging or died of unrelated cause in follow up or lost to follow up were excluded from study. Patients who had persistent detectable PSA ( 0.20 ng/ml) at 6 week with a second confirmatory level of PSA greater than 0.2 ng/ml at 3rd month were excluded from study.The age of the patient ranges from 46 to 79 years with the mean age of 65.36 ± 6.55 years. The mean PSA was 24.36 ± 26.68 ng/ml with range between 1.8 and 126.6 ng/ml. Nine patients (10%) developed BCR at 1-year follow-up and 81 patients were BCR-free. Thus, 1-year BCRFS and BCR rate were 90% and 10%, respectively in our study. Total 17 patients (18.9%) developed BCR during a 2-year period and 73 patients were free of BCR. Thus, 2-year BCRFS and BCR rate were 81.1% and 18.9%, respectively. A total of 29 patients (32.2%) had BCR and 61 patients were free of BCR at 3 years of follow-up. Thus, overall 3-year BCR rate and 3-year BCRFS rate were 32.2% and 67.8%, respectively. There was significant correlation of BCR with pre-operative PSA level, D'Amico classification, pathological stage, post-operative GS, and positive surgical margins.There is relative paucity of data regarding the BCR rate after RARP in the Indian scenario. The BCR rate in our study was similar to previously published Western and limited Indian data on RARP series in localized prostate cancer. There was significant correlation of BCR with PSA, post-operative GS, pathological stage, PSM, and D'Amico classification.

Introduction Idiopathic retroperitoneal fibrosis is a known cause of obstructive uropathy. Ureterolysis is done when medical management fails or the presentation is at an advanced stage. Conventionally ureterolysis without omental wrap has been considered incomplete. Our Institute has experience of laparoscopic or robotic ureterolysis with intraperitonealization of the ureter alone and no other adjunctive procedure. This study retrospectively assesses the result of the procedure with patients presenting with varying severity of disease. Methods From 2008, all patients who underwent laparoscopic or robotic ureterolysis were analyzed retrospectively for pre-operative management, operative findings, and post operative outcomes. Results We operated and released nine renal units in seven patients. Two of the nine cases were performed robotically completely and the rest was performed by laparoscopic approach. Median follow up was 60 months. All patients documented resolution of symptoms. The mean post-operative creatinine at 1 year was significantly decreased to 1.47 ± 0.49 mg/dl in comparison to preoperative creatinine ( p Conclusion Laparoscopic/robotic ureterolysis with intraperitonealization alone is secure and durable procedure for idiopathic retroperitoneal fibrosis needing surgical release.

paper designs a technique that hides the text in a image such that the modified (stego) image have same or enhanced quantized variance as compared to the original image. The algorithm hides the text in the higher frequency component of transformed image only if the image quantized variance needs the improvement at that pixel. This results in the enhanced image with hided data. The results are analysed over various images by using the parameters like PSNR, MSE and the quantized variance. Keywordserror, PSNR, jpeg, stego image.

Pancreatic necrosis is a complex and challenging complication of severe acute pancreatitis and it occurs in to of patients with acute pancreatitis It represents one of the most serious complications of severe acute pancreatitis with a mortality rate of to Majority of necrosis are sterile and can be managed conservatively However approximately of pancreatic necrosis develop infection and need an invasive intervention due to aggressive course A minimal invasive step up approach using percutaneous catheter drainage or endoscopic transluminal drainage is currently replacing more invasive open necrosectomy This review provides an overview of patho physiology clinical feature and management of pancreatic necrosis

This study was conducted to evaluate whether robotic-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (RALPN) is superior to laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) with regard to warm ischemia time and complications and, in addition, to report our novel technique of suturing in partial nephrectomy (PN). This was a prospective study carried out over a period of six years at our institute. A single surgeon performed PNs laparoscopically (17) and with robotic assistance (16). Only exophytic tumors were included and a novel technique of knotless and bolster-less suturing using Hem-o-loc clips was used to close the renal defect. There was no difference in intra-operative and post-operative blood loss between the two groups. However, LPN patients had significantly longer mean warm ischemia time (24.1 vs. 30.1 min, P

Introduction: Laparoscopic adrenalectomy (LA) is now considered the standard for treatment of surgically correctable adrenal disorders. Robotic adrenalectomy has been performed worldwide and has established itself as safe, feasible and effective approach. We hereby present the first study in robotic transperitoneal LA from Indian subcontinent. Materials and Methods: We conducted a retrospective evaluation of 25 patients who had undergone robotic assisted LA at a tertiary health centre by a single surgeon. Demographic, clinical, histopathological and perioperative outcome data were collected and analysed. Results: Mean age of the patients was 45 years (range: 27-65 years). Eleven male and 14 female patients were operated. Mean operative time was 139 min ± 30 min (range: 110-232 min) and mean blood loss was 85 ml ± 12 ml (range: 34-313 ml). Mean hospital stay was 2.5 ± 1.05 days (range: 2-6 days). Mean visual analogue scale score was 3.2 (range: 1-6) mean analgesic requirement was 50 mg diclofenac daily (range: 0-150 mg). Histopathological evaluation revealed 11 adenomas, eight phaeochromocytomas, two adrenocortical carcinomas, and four myelolipomas. According to Clavien-Dindo classification, three patients developed Grade I post-operative complications namely hypotension and pleural effusion. Conclusion: Robotic adrenalectomy is safe, technically feasible and comfortable to the surgeon. It is easier to perform with a short learning curve.

Introduction: Radical perineal prostatectomy was the first surgery described for prostatic carcinoma (Young, 1904) but it lost its eminent status after Walsh's description in 1982 of anatomic radical retropubic prostatectomy followed by the enthusiasm in laparoscopy and now robotics. It made resurgence after it was realized in early 1990s that the pelvic lymph node dissection is needed only in selected cases. Last decade witnessed over 80 publications addressing the results and advances in the perineal approach. Strangely, centres from the subcontinent have chosen to ignore this resurgence. We describe our early experience with the technique in 35 patients and present the case for its more widespread usage. Patients and Methods: Thirty five patients of clinically localized carcinoma prostate were operated by perineal route in our institution from December 2006 onwards. All patients had serum prostate specific antigen levels less than 10 ng/ml. Results: Operating time was 2 to 3.5 hours (mean 2.5 hours). Rectal injury occurred in three patients but was closed primarily in all and none required a colostomy. Mean duration of hospital stay was four days. The disease was organ confined in 25(71%). Positive margins were seen in 5(14%) patients. Biochemical recurrence occurred in 17% patients at one year. Seventy six percent patients had achieved continence at one year. Conclusions: As the world is taking note of radical perineal prostatectomy again, with a very small learning curve, minimal invasion and good oncological control urologists from Indian subcontinent should also embrace this procedure in view of the relative limited resources available.