Search

Aim: Familial Mediterranean fever (FMF) is a monogenic autoinflammatory disease characterised by recurrent episodes of fever and polyserositis. Sacroiliac joint involvement is rare in FMF patients. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the demographic, clinical, laboratory and imaging findings of patients with FMF who developed sacroiliitis. Methods: The files of paediatric patients aged 0–18 years who were followed up with a diagnosis of FMF were retrospectively reviewed. FMF patients with evidence of sacroiliitis on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were included in the study. Results: Among 1062 FMF patients, 22 (12 males; median age 8.5) (2.1%) of them were found to have sacroiliitis. FMF was diagnosed before sacroiliitis in nine (40.9%) patients and after in 13 (59.1%) patients. The most common symptom in patients with sacroiliitis was low back pain (n = 21, 95.5%). In MEFV gene analysis, M694V was found in 16 (72.7%) patients and was the most common mutation. MRI showed evidence of sacroiliitis in all patients. All patients were using colchicine. Patients with FMF‐associated sacroiliitis, remission was achieved with non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs in 12 (54.5%), conventional disease‐modifying antirheumatic drugs in six (27.3%) and tumour necrosis factor inhibitor treatment in four (31.8%). Four (31.8%) patients experienced sacroiliitis when colchicine incompatible and four (31.8%) patients experienced sacroiliitis while using biologic agents for colchicine‐resistant FMF. Conclusions: FMF‐associated sacroiliitis should be considered especially in patients with M694V mutation if they have symptoms such as low back pain. Colchicine‐resistant FMF patients should be evaluated for sacroiliitis symptoms at each visit. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To describe the frequency of MR and CT features of infectious sacroiliitis (ISI) and assess its extent and complications Materials and methods: This retrospective study included patients with ISI who were evaluated between 2008 and 2021 in a single center. Two radiologists reviewed MRI and CT images to determine the anatomical distribution (unilateral/bilateral, iliac/sacral bone, proximal/middle/distal), severity (bone marrow edema [BME]/periostitis/erosions), concurrent infection (vertebral/nonvertebral), and complications (abscess/probable adjacent osteomyelitis/cavitation/devitalized areas/sequestrum/pelvic venous thrombosis) of ISI. Interobserver reproducibility was assessed. Correlation analysis evaluated the effect of the causative microorganism on severity. Two human bodies were dissected to outline possible ways that ISI can spread. Results: Forty patients with ISI (40 years ± 22; 26 women) were evaluated. Ten patients had bilateral ISI. Concurrent vertebral infection was associated in 15% of cases. Reproducibility of sacral BME, periostitis, and reactive locoregional abnormalities was perfect (κ = 1). Reproducibility was low for erosion count (κ = 0.52[0.52–0.82]) and periarticular osteopenia (κ = 0.50[0.18–0.82]). Inflammatory changes were BME (42/42 joints), muscle edema (38/42), and severe periostitis along the ilium (33/37). Destructive structural changes occurred with confluent erosions (iliac, 20/48; sacral, 13/48), sequestrum (20/48), and cavitation (12/48). Complications occurred in 75% of cases, including periarticular abscesses (n = 30/47), probable adjacent osteomyelitis (n = 16/37), and pelvic thrombophlebitis (n = 3). Tuberculous ISI (6/40) correlated with sclerosis (rs = 0.45[0.16; 0.67]; p < 10−2) and bone devitalization (rs = 0.38[0.16; 0.67]; p =.02). The anatomical study highlighted the shared venous vascularization of sacroiliac joints, pelvic organs, and mobile spine. Conclusion: Complications of ISI are frequent, including abscesses, adjacent osteomyelitis, and periostitis. ISI had bilateral involvement nonrarely and is commonly associated with another spinal infection. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives Extra-osseous (EO) manifestations are poorly characterized in chronic recurrent multifocal osteomyelitis (CRMO). This study aimed to further define the frequency, characteristics and treatment of EO events in CRMO and whether different phenotypes can be distinguished and benefit from special management. Methods This multicentre retrospective study included CRMO patients followed in several paediatric rheumatology departments in France between 2015 and 2022. EO manifestations were defined as skin lesions, gastrointestinal manifestations, arthritis, enthesitis, sacroiliitis, uveitis, vasculitis and fever. At the last visit, the physician defined CRMO as active in the presence of clinical manifestations including both osseous and EO symptoms. Results We included 133 patients; 87 (65.4%) were girls and the median age at first symptoms was 9.0 years (interquartile range 7.0–10.0). EO manifestations were described in 90 (67.7%) patients, with a predominance of skin lesions [ n  = 51/90 (56.7%)], followed by sacroiliitis [ n  = 38/90 (42.2%)], enthesitis [ n  = 21/90 (23.3%)], arthritis [ n  = 14/90 (15.6%)] and gastrointestinal manifestations [ n  = 6/90 (6.7%)]. The use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and bisphosphonates did not differ by the presence or not of EO manifestations. Biologics were taken more frequently by patients with than without EO manifestations (P  < 0.001); TNF inhibitors were used in 33 (36.7%) EO-positive patients. Under this treatment, 18 (54.5%) patients achieved complete remission of osseous and EO manifestations. At the last visit, more EO+ than EO− patients were on treatment (P  = 0.009), with active disease in 58 (64.4%) patients. Conclusion The analysis of EO manifestations in CRMO delineates two groups of patients in terms of severity and treatments used. Our study opens up new pathophysiological leads that may underlie the wide range of CRMO phenotypes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: Axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) is a chronic rheumatic, musculoskeletal, inflammatory disease with a propensity to present as sacroiliitis, which manifests as low back, buttock, or thigh pain. Effective primary management of axSpA requires a comprehensive approach specific to each patient and disease severity. Non‐pharmacological measures form the cornerstone of treatment. With refractory disease, management also consists of local periarticular and intraarticular injections. The use of sacroiliac joint (SIJ) corticosteroid injections for the treatment of axSpA and localised inflammation, however, is a continuously burgeoning management option. This narrative review aims to present consolidated findings and summarise previously unreferenced or recently available evidence regarding corticosteroid injections to the SIJ for treating sacroiliitis and axSpA. Methods: A comprehensive literary review with the following electronic databases was searched: MEDLINE via PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and EMBASE. Results: The initial search yielded a total of 126 references. After duplicates were removed and the remainder analysed for inclusion criteria, 7 studies were included. To stratify each study, injection methodology and characteristics were defined. Discussion: The use of SIJ corticosteroid injections can be an appropriate and effective treatment option for refractory axSpA. The studies presented in this review reported a general trend towards a reduction in pain severity after SIJ corticosteroid injections. Because of the complexity and heterogeneity of the anatomy of the SIJ, image guidance is recommended when performing SIJ injections. Image‐guided injections seem to produce better outcomes when compared to anatomic landmark‐guided injections. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Sacroiliitis is commonly seen in patients with axial spondyloarthritis, in whom timely diagnosis and treatment are crucial to prevent irreversible structural damage. Imaging has a prominent place in the diagnostic process and several new imaging techniques have been examined for this purpose. We present a summary of updated evidence-based practice recommendations for imaging of sacroiliitis. MRI remains the imaging modality of choice for patients with suspected sacroiliitis, using at least four sequences: coronal oblique T1-weighted and fluid-sensitive sequences, a perpendicular axial oblique sequence, and a sequence for optimal evaluation of the bone-cartilage interface. Both active inflammatory and structural lesions should be described in the report, indicating location and extent. Radiography and CT, especially low-dose CT, are reasonable alternatives when MRI is unavailable, as patients are often young. This is particularly true to evaluate structural lesions, at which CT excels. Dual-energy CT with virtual non-calcium images can be used to depict bone marrow edema. Knowledge of normal imaging features in children (e.g., flaring, blurring, or irregular appearance of the articular surface) is essential for interpreting sacroiliac joint MRI in children because these normal processes can simulate disease. Clinical relevance statement: Sacroiliitis is a potentially debilitating disease if not diagnosed and treated promptly, before structural damage to the sacroiliac joints occurs. Imaging has a prominent place in the diagnostic process. We present a summary of practice recommendations for imaging of sacroiliitis, including several new imaging techniques. Key Points: • MRI is the modality of choice for suspected inflammatory sacroiliitis, including a joint-line-specific sequence for optimal evaluation of the bone-cartilage interface to improve detection of erosions. • Radiography and CT (especially low-dose CT) are reasonable alternatives when MRI is unavailable. • Knowledge of normal imaging features in children is mandatory for interpretation of MRI of pediatric sacroiliac joints. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

OBJECTIVE: The objective is to evaluate the efficacy of platelet-rich plasma and steroid injection in the management of sacroiliitis. Background: Sacroiliitis is considered a diagnostic feature of seronegative spondyloarthropathy (SPA). Sacroiliac joint steroid injection is the most commonly used method. Currently steroid, injection therapy and platelet-rich plasma (PRP) therapy are current treatment trends. Material and Methods: This interventional study included 60 patients with seronegative axial SPA. Patients were divided into two groups: group I received a c arm guided steroid injection and group II received a PRP injection. Patients were assessed by Visual Analog Scale and Modified Oswestry Disability Questionnaire (MODQ) at 4 and 8 weeks postinjection and by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at 8 weeks postinjection. Result: Steroids and PRP are effective in treating sacroiliitis. The improvement was significant and lasted longer in group II (68.6% mild pain by Vas and 74.3% minimal disability related to MODQ) compared to group I at 8 weeks postinjection. Steroid-treated patients improved significantly in 4 weeks (60% of patients experienced mild pain in Vas and 45.7% had minimal defects in MODQ), but efficacy declined after 8 weeks. According to follow-up MRI, active sacroiliitis can be completely improved with PRP injection (57.1% with normal MRI results after 8 weeks). Conclusion: Steroids and PRP were effective in the treatment of sacroiliitis in seronegative SPA under C arm guidance. But PRP was persistent and prolonged.

Abstract Background Spondyloarthritis (SpA) encompasses a spectrum of immune-mediated inflammatory conditions primarily affecting the axial skeleton, including sacroiliitis and spondylitis, each with distinct features. This study aimed to investigate imaging disparities, focusing on sacroiliac magnetic resonance and spine radiography, across phenotypes and between males and females in axial SpA. Method A cross-sectional study was conducted to assess clinical data, laboratory findings, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scores of sacroiliac joints using the Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada (SPARCC) and Sacroiliac Joint Structural Score (SSS), and cervical and lumbar spine radiographs utilizing the Modified Stoke Ankylosing Spondylitis Spine Score (mSASSS). The study aimed to compare these parameters between two groups: axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA, radiographic and non-radiographic) and axial psoriatic arthritis (axPsA), as well as between males and females. Results Ninety-four patients were included, with 62 patients in the axSpA group and 32 patients in the axPsA group. There were no differences in disease activity, mobility, radiographic damage in the spine (Modified Stoke Ankylosing Spondylitis Spine Score– mSASSS), or sacroiliac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scores (Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada Magnetic Resonance Imaging Index - SPARCC and Sacroiliac Joint Structural Score - SSS) between the two phenotypes. Regarding sex, in imaging exams, men had higher mSASSS (p = 0.008), SSS (p = 0.001), and fat metaplasia (MG) score based on SSS (p = 0.001), while women had significantly higher SPARCC scores (p = 0.039). In the male group, the presence of HLA-B27 allele had an impact on more structural lesions on MRI (SSS), p = 0.013. Conclusion In this study, imaging of sacroiliac joints and spine in patients with axial SpA did not show differences in phenotypes but did reveal differences based on sex, which may have an impact on future diagnostic recommendations. Further studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a chronic inflammatory disease affecting the musculoskeletal system, skin and nails. In addition to peripheral joints, inflammation of the spine and sacroiliac joints may occur. Yet, research into this axial phenotype has lagged behind partly because of the challenge in its clinical identification with a lack of specific clinical, molecular or imaging biomarkers. In the absence of a validated definition of what constitutes axial PsA (axPsA), guidelines for the management of axial involvement in PsA in clinical practice are scarce. On the basis of a literature review and their clinical expertise, a group of rheumatology experts provide their opinion to aid the diagnosis and management of axial PsA in clinical practice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) is an inflammatory disorder of unknown cause that primarily affects the axial skeleton, peripheral joints, and extra-articular structures. Typically, the condition starts in the second or third decade. Lower back pain lasting longer than three months, morning stiffness lasting more than 30 minutes, relieved by daily activities, are signs of disease onset. Aim: To establish a correlation between disease severity score Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) scoring in patients with AS. Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted on 66 patients attending the Medicine Emergency/Outpatient Department (OPD)/ward of ESIPGIMSR and ESI Hospital, Basaidarapur, New Delhi, India, who were diagonsed with AS based on the modified New York Criteria. Clinical assessments included ASDAS based on Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) and C-reactive Protein (CRP), while MRI disease activity scores were determined using the Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada (SPARCC) MRI scoring. The sample size was calculated with a coefficient limit of 10% and a confidence level of 95%. Data analysis was performed using Statistical Packages for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 21.0, a widely used statistical computing and graphics tool. Pearson’s correlation coefficients were computed to explore relationships between variables, including age, disease duration, ASDAS-ESR, and MRI changes. Results: In present study, a total of 66 patients were included, out of which 51 (77.3%) were males and 15 (22.7%) were females. The age group of patients included in present study was 33 years to 44 years with a mean of 37.96 years. In present study, the disease duration ranged from a minimum of two years to a maximum of 10 years with a mean of 5.4 years. The mean ASDAS CRP was 3.687 (minimum-2.80, maximum-4.60), and the disease activity as assessed by MRI score (SPARCC) had a minimum value of 8.85 and a maximum value of 26.2 with a mean of 16.359. In present study, the X-ray grading of sacroiliitis revealed that 19.7% of the subjects were classified as Grade-2, 60.6% as Grade-3, and 19.7% as Grade-4. Conclusion: The clinical disease activity index may not always reflect active inflammation, which is detectable by MRI. Incorporating MRI into diagnostic and treatment strategies for AS is crucial for the accurate assessment of disease severity and better patient outcomes.

Objective: Sarcoidosis is a chronic inflammatory disease that affects many organs and systems, especially the lungs, lymph nodes and musculoskeletal system. Musculoskeletal system involvement patterns in sarcoidosis are not well defined and literature data are limited in terms of clinical features. This study aimed to investigate the clinical and demographic characteristics of sarcoidosis patients with musculoskeletal system involvement. Methods: One hundred and four patients with sarcoidosis who were followed up in our clinic between June 2020 and January 2024 were evaluated retrospectively. Forty-four sarcoidosis patients aged >18 years with objectively detected musculoskeletal system involvement were included in the study. The musculoskeletal system involvement patterns, clinical and laboratory findings, and demographic characteristics of the patients were analyzed. Results: Musculoskeletal involvement was found in 44 of the 104 sarcoidosis patients (42%). Of the 44 patients with musculoskeletal involvement, 37 (77.3%) were female, the mean age was 46.9±12.2 years, and the mean follow-up time was 14±11.8 months. The most common objective musculoskeletal pathology was chronic arthritis (17%), mostly in the form of chronic oligoarthritis. Wrist (50% vs. 3.8%, p=0.001) and metacarpophalangeal joint involvement (38.9% vs. 0, p=0.001) were significantly higher in patients with chronic arthritis than in patients with acute arthritis. While joint involvement starting as monoarthritis was an independent negative predictor for the development of chronic arthritis [odds ratio (OR): 0.046, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.003-0.815, p=0.036], the presence of obesity at baseline was a positive predictor for the development of chronic arthritis (OR: 11.968, 95% CI: 1.069-133.960, p=0.044). Conclusion: Sarcoidosis can present with a wide range of musculoskeletal manifestations. The most common musculoskeletal pathologies in sarcoidosis are acute and chronic arthritis. Sarcoidosis patients presenting with monoarthritis do not usually develop chronic arthritis. Patients with chronic sarcoid arthritis initially present more hand-joint involvement. Obesity is a risk factor for the development of chronic arthritis.

Familial Mediterranean fever (FMF) is an autosomal recessive disease distributed among populations of Mediterranean origin – Armenians, Sephardi Jews, Arabs, Turks. There are numerous clinical observations regarding combination of FMF, as a classical representative of autoinflammatory diseases, with systemic diseases of connective tissue. Seronegative spondyloarthritis (SpA) are the most interesting disorders from this point of view, as far as sacroiliitis – an essential feature of SpA, may also present as a part of joint syndrome in FMF. The main objective of this clinical study was the investigation of the peculiarities of courses of FMF and SpA in case of their coexistence. We studied 126 patients with FMF, SpA and coexistence of both. According to results, patients with the overlap of FMF with SpA had relatively milder course of disease in comparison with each disease separately. Comparative clinical and instrumental characteristics of FMF-associated disorders had shown that in FMF-SpA overlap the symptoms of both diseases are less severe.

Introduction: Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) is an inflammatory disorder of unknown cause that primarily affects the axial skeleton, peripheral joints, and extra-articular structures. Typically, the condition starts in the second or third decade. Lower back pain lasting longer than three months, morning stiffness lasting more than 30 minutes, relieved by daily activities, are signs of disease onset. Aim: To establish a correlation between disease severity score Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) scoring in patients with AS. Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted on 66 patients attending the Medicine Emergency/ Outpatient Department (OPD)/ward of ESIPGIMSR and ESI Hospital, Basaidarapur, New Delhi, India, who were diagonsed with AS based on the modified New York Criteria. Clinical assessments included ASDAS based on Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) and C-reactive Protein (CRP), while MRI disease activity scores were determined using the Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada (SPARCC) MRI scoring. The sample size was calculated with a coefficient limit of 10% and a confidence level of 95%. Data analysis was performed using Statistical Packages for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 21.0, a widely used statistical computing and graphics tool. Pearson's correlation coefficients were computed to explore relationships between variables, including age, disease duration, ASDAS-ESR, and MRI changes. Results: In present study, a total of 66 patients were included, out of which 51 (77.3%) were males and 15 (22.7%) were females. The age group of patients included in present study was 33 years to 44 years with a mean of 37.96 years. In present study, the disease duration ranged from a minimum of two years to a maximum of 10 years with a mean of 5.4 years. The mean ASDAS CRP was 3.687 (minimum-2.80, maximum-4.60), and the disease activity as assessed by MRI score (SPARCC) had a minimum value of 8.85 and a maximum value of 26.2 with a mean of 16.359. In present study, the X-ray grading of sacroiliitis revealed that 19.7% of the subjects were classified as Grade-2, 60.6% as Grade-3, and 19.7% as Grade-4. Conclusion: The clinical disease activity index may not always reflect active inflammation, which is detectable by MRI. Incorporating MRI into diagnostic and treatment strategies for AS is crucial for the accurate assessment of disease severity and better patient outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Pain in the sacroiliac (SI) region is a common clinical manifestation, often caused by diseases involving the SI joints. This is typically due to inflammation or degenerative changes, while infections or cancer are less frequent causes. The SI joint is challenging to image accurately because of its distinct anatomical characteristics. For an accurate diagnosis, conventional radiography often needs to be supplemented with more precise methods such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or computed tomography (CT). Sacroiliitis, a common presenting feature of axial spondyloarthritis (axial SpA), manifests as bone marrow edema, erosions, sclerosis, and joint space narrowing. Septic sacroiliitis and repetitive stress injuries in sports can also cause changes resembling inflammatory sacroiliitis. Other conditions, such as osteitis condensans ilii (OCI), can mimic the radiologic characteristics of sacroiliitis. Inflammatory lesions are diagnosed by concurrent erosions, hyperostosis, and ankylosis. Ligament ossifications or mechanical stress can also result in arthritic disorders. Determining the exact diagnosis can be aided by the distribution of the lesions. Inflammatory lesions can affect any part of the articulation, including the inferior and posterior portions. Mechanical lesions, such as those seen in OCI, often occur in the anterior middle region of the joint. In cases of idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis, ligament ossification is found at the joint borders. This pictorial essay describes common SI joint problems, illustrated with multimodal imaging data. We, also, discuss strategies for selecting the best imaging modalities, along with imaging pitfalls, key points, and approaches for treating patients with suspected inflammatory back pain. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Sarcoidosis is a chronic inflammatory disease that affects many organs and systems, especially the lungs, lymph nodes and musculoskeletal system. Musculoskeletal system involvement patterns in sarcoidosis are not well defined and literature data are limited in terms of clinical features. This study aimed to investigate the clinical and demographic characteristics of sarcoidosis patients with musculoskeletal system involvement. Methods: One hundred and four patients with sarcoidosis who were followed up in our clinic between June 2020 and January 2024 were evaluated retrospectively. Forty-four sarcoidosis patients aged >18 years with objectively detected musculoskeletal system involvement were included in the study. The musculoskeletal system involvement patterns, clinical and laboratory findings, and demographic characteristics of the patients were analyzed. Results: Musculoskeletal involvement was found in 44 of the 104 sarcoidosis patients (42%). Of the 44 patients with musculoskeletal involvement, 37 (77.3%) were female, the mean age was 46.9±12.2 years, and the mean follow-up time was 14±11.8 months. The most common objective musculoskeletal pathology was chronic arthritis (17%), mostly in the form of chronic oligoarthritis. Wrist (50% vs. 3.8%, p=0.001) and metacarpophalangeal joint involvement (38.9% vs. 0, p=0.001) were significantly higher in patients with chronic arthritis than in patients with acute arthritis. While joint involvement starting as monoarthritis was an independent negative predictor for the development of chronic arthritis [odds ratio (OR): 0.046, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.003-0.815, p=0.036], the presence of obesity at baseline was a positive predictor for the development of chronic arthritis (OR: 11.968, 95% CI: 1.069-133.960, p=0.044). Conclusion: Sarcoidosis can present with a wide range of musculoskeletal manifestations. The most common musculoskeletal pathologies in sarcoidosis are acute and chronic arthritis. Sarcoidosis patients presenting with monoarthritis do not usually develop chronic arthritis. Patients with chronic sarcoid arthritis initially present more hand-joint involvement. Obesity is a risk factor for the development of chronic arthritis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To present MRI distribution of active osteitis in a single tertiary referral center cohort of patients with chronic nonbacterial osteomyelitis (CNO). Methods: Two musculoskeletal radiologists retrospectively reviewed MRI examinations of all patients with a final clinical diagnosis of CNO over 15 years. Sites of active osteitis at any time during the course of disease were divided into seven groups: (A) mandible, sternum, clavicles, or scapulas; (B) upper extremities; (C) subchondral sacrum and ilium immediately subjacent to sacroiliac joints (active osteitis denoting "active sacroiliitis" here); (D) pelvis and proximal 1/3 of femurs (excluding group C); (E) bones surrounding knees including distal 2/3 of femurs and 1/2 of proximal tibias and fibulas; (F) distal legs (including distal 1/2 of tibias and fibulas), ankles, or feet; (G) spine (excluding group C). Temporal changes of lesions in response to treatment (or other treatment-related changes such as pamidronate lines) were not within the scope of the study. Results: Among 97 CNO patients (53 males [55%], 44 females; age at onset, mean ± SD, 8.5 ± 3.2 years; age at diagnosis, 10.3 ± 3.3 years), whole-body (WB) MRI was performed in 92%, mostly following an initial targeted MRI (94%). A total of 557 (346 targeted and 211 WB) MRIs were analyzed. Biopsy was obtained in 39 patients (40%), all consistent with CNO or featuring supporting findings. The most common locations for active osteitis were groups D (78%; 95% CI 69‒85%) and C (72%; 95% CI 62‒80%). Conclusion: Pelvis and hips were preferentially involved in this cohort of CNO patients along with a marked presence of active sacroiliitis. Clinical relevance statement: When suggestive findings of CNO are identified elsewhere in the body, the next targeted site of MRI should be the pelvis (entirely including sacroiliac joints) and hips, if whole-body MRI is not available or feasible. Key Points: • Heavy reliance on MRI for diagnosis of CNO underscores the importance of suggestive distribution patterns. • Pelvis and hips are the most common (78%) sites of CNO involvement along with active sacroiliitis (72%). • Pelvis including sacroiliac joints and hips should be targeted on MRI when CNO is suspected. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims/Background Sacroiliitis is a challenging condition to diagnose accurately due to the subtle nature of its presentation in imaging studies. This study aims to improve the diagnostic accuracy of sacroiliitis by applying advanced machine learning techniques to computed tomography (CT) images. Methods We employed five convolutional neural network (CNN) models—Visual Geometry Group 16-layer Network (VGG16), ResNet101, DenseNet, Inception-v4, and ResNeXt-50—to analyze a dataset of 830 CT images, including both sacroiliitis and non-sacroiliitis cases. Each model's performance was evaluated using metrics such as accuracy, precision, recall, F1 score, Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC), and Area Under the Curve (AUC). The interpretability of the models' decisions was enhanced using Gradient-weighted Class Activation Mapping (Grad-CAM) visualization. Results The ResNeXt-50 and Inception-v4 models demonstrated superior performance, achieving the highest accuracy and F1 scores among the tested models. Grad-CAM visualizations offered insights into the decision-making processes, highlighting the models' focus on relevant anatomical features critical for accurate diagnosis. Conclusion The use of CNN models, particularly ResNeXt-50 and Inception-v4, significantly improves the diagnosis of sacroiliitis from CT images. These models not only provide high diagnostic accuracy but also offer transparency in their decision-making processes, aiding clinicians in understanding and trusting Artificial Intelligence (AI)-driven diagnostics. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Unilateral presentation of sacroiliitis is a diagnostic dilemma, especially between infection and inflammatory sacroiliitis associated with spondyloarthritis, requiring an early and accurate diagnosis. Objective: To assess the utility of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in differentiating infective versus inflammatory etiology in unilateral sacroiliitis. Materials and Methods: Retrospective review of the MRI of 90 patients with unilateral sacroiliitis, having an established final diagnosis. MR images were evaluated for various bone and soft tissue changes using predefined criteria and analyzed using univariate and multivariate regression analysis. Results: Among the 90 patients, infective etiology was diagnosed in 66 (73.3%) and inflammatory etiology in 24 (26.7%). Large erosions, both iliac and sacral‐sided edema, joint space involvement with effusion or synovitis, soft tissue edema, elevated ESR/CRP, and absence of capsulitis and enthesitis were associated with infection (p <.001). The independently differentiating variables favoring infection on multivariate analysis were—both iliac and sacral‐sided edema (OR 4.79, 95% CI: 0.96–23.81, p =.05), large erosions (OR 17.96, 95% CI: 2.66–121.02, p =.003), and joint space involvement (OR 9.9, 95% CI: 1.36–72.06, p =.02). Exclusive features of infection were osteomyelitis, sequestra, abscesses, sinus tracts, large erosions, and multifocality. All infective cases had soft tissue edema, joint space involvement, elevated ESR, and no capsulitis. Conclusion: MRI evaluation for the presence and pattern of bone and joint space involvement, soft tissue involvement, and careful attention to certain exclusive features will aid in differentiating infectious sacroiliitis from inflammatory sacroiliitis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

To evaluate the prevalence and rate of a missed diagnosis of sacroiliitis on abdominal computed tomography (CT) in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Factors associated with sacroiliitis were also assessed. This retrospective study included 210 patients with IBD (mean age 31.1 years) who underwent abdominal CT. Based on a validated abdominal CT scoring tool, bilateral sacroiliac (SI) joints on abdominal CT in the whole study population were retrospectively reviewed. Subsequently, patients were classified into the 'patients with sacroiliitis' group and the 'patients without sacroiliitis' group. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were used to clarify the factors associated with sacroiliitis. Sacroiliitis was identified in 26 out of 210 patients (12.4%). However, sacroiliitis was recognized on the primary reading in only five of these 26 patients (19.2%) and was missed on the initial report in the remaining 21 patients (80.8%). Among the 21 patients, 20 (95.2%) were finally diagnosed with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA). There was a higher prevalence of female sex (p = 0.04), upper gastrointestinal involvement (p = 0.04), and back pain (p < 0.01) in patients with sacroiliitis than in those without sacroiliitis. However, on multivariate analysis, back pain was the only factor associated with sacroiliitis (p = 0.01). Physicians should carefully evaluate SI joints on abdominal CT in patients with IBD to enable early detection of sacroiliitis, potentially leading to an early diagnosis of axSpA. In addition, if patients with IBD present with back pain, the possibility of sacroiliitis should be considered. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Key Clinical Message: Clinicians should carefully consider generalized lymphadenopathy, particularly post viral infections, as one of the possible systemic lupus erythematous (SLE) first signs regarding unusual joint involvements such as sacroiliitis. Late diagnosis of this autoimmune inflammatory disease, could lead to irreversible morbidity and higher mortality. Lymphadenopathy could represent various etiologies, including infections, malignancies, and rheumatologic diseases. SLE is known as the great mimicker which could be presented with different first manifestations. We report a 42‐year‐old woman in the acute phase of Epstein–Barr infection, admitted with polyarticular peripheral arthritis, sacroiliitis, and generalized lymphadenopathy. She had no similar history or taken unpasteurized dairy. Nodes were soft, mobile, and tender without skin change on top. During the process, she was diagnosed with SLE and discharged with prednisolone 30 mg/day and hydroxychloroquine 400 mg/day. After 2 weeks of follow‐up, all lymphadenopathy and symptoms were diminished. This case underscores the thousand faces innate of SLE. Clinical awareness would lead to an accurate diagnosis and early intervention. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

VEXAS syndrome is a recently described autoinflammatory syndrome caused by the somatic acquisition of UBA1 mutations in myeloid precursors and is frequently associated with hematologic malignancies, chiefly myelodysplastic syndromes. Disease presentation can mimic several rheumatologic disorders, delaying the diagnosis. We describe a case of atypical presentation resembling late-onset axial spondylarthritis, later progressing to a systemic inflammatory syndrome with chondritis, cutaneous vasculitis, and transfusion-dependent anemia, requiring high doses of steroids. Ruxolitinib was used as the first steroid-sparing strategy without response. However, azacitidine showed activity in controlling both inflammation and the mutant clone. This case raises the question of whether azacitidine's anti-inflammatory effects are dependent on or independent of clonal control. We discuss the potential relevance of molecular remission in VEXAS syndrome and highlight the importance of a multidisciplinary team for the care of such complex patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: To reveal the differences by comparing the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings of patients with clinically symptomatic sacroiliitis with those undergoing sacroiliac imaging for other reasons using the Canadian Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium-Sacroiliac Inflammatory Scoring System (SPARCC-SIS). Methods: In this retrospective single-center study, sacroiliac MRIs performed between 2017 and 2023 were evaluated from the database. The SPARCC-SIS scoring system is used to evaluate and grade the inflammation of the sacroiliac joints. Mild inflammation is indicated by a score below 24, moderate by a score of 24–48, and severe by a score above 49. Additionally, structural defects of the sacroiliac joint, such as erosion, sclerosis, and ankylosis, were observed. After MRI evaluation, clinically symptomatic (group 1) and non-symptomatic (group 2) patients were divided into two groups. The clinical and laboratory findings of the patients and MRI findings were compared. The patient's age, gender, clinical information from hospital records, acute phase reactants (APRs), and the presence of the Human Leukocyte Antigen (HLA-B27) gene (if applicable) were thoroughly recorded. Results: One hundred thirty-six children who performed sacroiliac MRI for any indication were included in the study. The APRs positivity, presence of HLA-B27, and SPARCC scoring system were significantly higher in 24 patients with clinical sacroiliitis (group 1) than in 112 patients without sacroiliitis (group 2). In our study, the most common MRI findings in children were bone marrow edema, capsulitis, synovitis, and erosion, while chronic structural changes such as sclerosis and ankylosing were rare. Conclusion: In this study, the SPARCC scoring method, which shows the severity of sacroiliac joint inflammation, correlates with the clinical diagnosis of sacroiliitis. In cases with suspected sacroiliitis, except for extraordinary reasons, it can be evaluated with MRI without contrast material and can be graded to guide the clinician in treatment and approach. Key points • Since the SPARCC scoring method, which shows the severity of sacroiliac joint inflammation, will guide the clinician, its use in the pediatric population will be beneficial and feasible. • Non-contrast scans are often sufficient to assess inflammation in the sacroiliac joint. In the evaluation of sacroiliac MRI in children, evaluation can be made without contrast. • Since chronic changes in the sacroiliac joint are very rare in children, evaluation with radiography or CT may not be needed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Assess the diagnostic utility of repeat sacroiliac joint (SIJ) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examinations following an inconclusive initial examination performed for suspected sacroiliitis. Method: Subjects with > 1 SIJ MRI examinations, an inconclusive first scan and at least 6 months interval between scans, were included. All scans were evaluated for the presence of structural/active SIJ lesions as well as any other pathology. Clinical data was extracted from the patients' clinical files, and any missing data was obtained by a telephone interview. Diagnosis and active/structural scores were compared between first and follow-up examinations (t test). Results: Seventy-one subjects were included in the study, 77.4% females, mean age 41.0 ± 15 years, mean time interval between exams 30.4 ± 25.24 months. Twelve subjects performed > 2 scans. In only two subjects (2.81%), both females, MRI diagnosis changed from inconclusive to definite sacroiliitis. None of the subjects with > 2 scans had evidence of sacroiliitis in any of the following MRI examinations. Significant differences were observed between the scores of active SIJ lesion of the first and follow-up MRI (1.51/1.62, p = 0.02) but not for scores of structural lesions (1.22/1.68, p = 0.2). Conclusions: Repeat SIJ MRI when the first MRI is inconclusive for sacroiliitis is more valuable in ruling out than in securing diagnosis of sacroiliitis. We suggest that when MRI findings are inconclusive, decision-making should be based on clinical data. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This article presents a case report of a 43-year-old male patient with sickle cell anemia (SCA) who initially received a diagnosis of axial spondyloarthropathy (AxSpA) due to symptoms of low back pain. However, after an inadequate response to treatment, further imaging revealed sacroiliac avascular necrosis, which is a rare complication of SCA. The patient was then treated accordingly for the avascular necrosis. The article emphasizes the importance of considering osteonecrosis as a possible diagnosis in SCA patients, even in uncommon locations such as the pelvic bones, and highlights the need for accurate differential diagnosis in cases of low back pain. [Extracted from the article]

Axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) is a chronic, immune-mediated inflammatory disorder involving the sacroiliac (SI) joints, spine, entheses and peripheral joints. It encompasses both radiographic (r-axSPA) and non-radiographic (nr-axSPA) axial SpA according to the presence or absence of radiographic sacroiliitis. To study the demographic features, clinical manifestations and imaging characteristics of axSpA and to assess the differences between r-axSpA and nr-axSpA. This study was conducted on 80 axSpA patients. All Patients were subjected to detailed medical history, assessment of disease activity, functional status, laboratory investigations and imaging.Bath AS Disease Activity Index (BASDAI), AS disease activity score (ASDAS), Bath AS Functional Index (BASFI) were assessed. Radiographic sacroiliitis was assessed using the Stoke Ankylosing Spondylitis Spinal Score (mSASSS). The 80 axSpA patients were 59 (73.8 %) nr-axSpA and 21 (26.3 %) with r-axSpA. The mean age of the patients was 35 ± 8.6 (18–55 years). 43 (53.8 %) were males and 37 (46.3 %) females and the median disease duration was 6.5 years (0.5–22 years). Human leucocytic antigen was positive in 16.3 % and psoriasis was present in 13.8 %. Smoking (61.9 % vs 20.3 %; p < 0.0001, hip arthritis (47.6 % vs 13.6 %;p = 0.001), ASDAS (3.03 ± 0.64 vs 2.59 ± 0.79; p = 0.02), BASDAI (3.4 ± 1.1 vs 2.7 ± 1.3;p = 0.03), BASFI (4.7 ± 1.1 vs 3.1 ± 1.3; p < 0.0001) and mSASSS (17 vs 0) were significantly higher in r-axSpA. Characteristics of axSpA of Egyptian patients are comparable with those of other patients across the world. By comparing r-axSpA and nr-axSPA patients, both groups are significantly different regarding sex, smoking, hip arthritis, disease activity scores and mSASSS. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The aim of the present study is to systematically review the current literature about diagnosis and treatment of acute inflammatory sacroiliitis in pregnant or post-partum women. A systematic search was carried out according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Data about clinical presentation, diagnosis methods and treatment strategies were retrieved from included studies and reported in a table. After screening, five studies on 34 women were included; they were all affected by acute inflammatory sacroiliitis. Clinical examination and magnetic resonance imaging were used to confirm diagnosis. In four studies, patients were treated with ultrasound-guided sacroiliac injections of steroids and local anesthetics, while one study used only manual mobilization. Clinical scores improved in all patients. Ultrasound-guided injections proved to be a safe and effective strategy for inflammatory sacroiliitis treatment during pregnancy or post-partum. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Study Design: This was a prospective observational study. Objectives: We report clinical outcomes in a clinical study of patients treated with cooled radiofrequency ablation for chronic back pain associated with lumbar facet arthropathy with sacroiliac dysfunction (unilateral as well as bilateral) associated with multiple medical comorbidities. Summary of Background Data: A clinical study was conducted on patients with lumbar facet arthropathy with sacroiliac dysfunction. A significant difference was observed postprocedure during periodical follow-ups. Materials and Methods: A prospective observational study of 56 patients suffering from lumbar facet arthropathy with sacroiliac joint dysfunctions was conducted at Apollo Multi-Speciality Hospital, Kolkata, from July 2022 to July 2023 over 1 year. Inclusion criteria are chronic low back pain with degenerative lumbar facet arthropathy with sacroiliac dysfunction with sacroiliitis and patients with failed back syndrome which fails on conservative management for at least 3 months in more than 30-year-old patients. The outcome assessment of all patients was done by the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores and followed up for 0, 1, 3, and 6 months and 1 year. Results: We found significant relief in pain with a significant statistical difference on subsequent follow-up over 6 months to 1 year using VAS and ODI scores. We did not get any major complications in our study despite elderly patients with multiple medical comorbidities. Conclusion: Cooled radiofrequency significantly improves the pain associated with lumbar facet arthropathy with sacroiliac dysfunction with promising results.

Objective. To review the role of sacro-iliac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the diagnosis of axial spondyloarthritis (AxSpA), with a focus on gender differences. Methods. The experience of the authors and the results of an informal literature review are reported. Results. Inflammatory changes of the sacro-iliac joint are the hallmark of AxSpA. Early, non-radiographic sacroiliitis may be diagnosed with MRI through the assessment of bone marrow edema (BMO) as well as concomitant structural damage. The MRI protocol should include three necessary sequences, i.e., fat-saturated T2-weighted sequences on two orthogonal planes, T1-weighted semi-coronal sequence, and fat-suppressed T1-weighted semi-coronal sequence. Inflammatory changes comprise required signs (BMO and/or osteitis) and additional signs, including synovitis (better defined as joint space enhancement), enthesitis, and capsulitis. Structural changes consist of erosions, sclerosis, fat metaplasia, and ankylosis. Due to mechanical axial strain, inflammatory changes in the sacro-iliac joint can be found in healthy individuals, runners, and patients with nonspecific low back pain. The prevalence of BMO is higher in women during pregnancy and postpartum, even 12 months after childbirth, but the extent and distribution of MRI findings may help in the differential diagnosis. Other challenges in the MRI diagnosis of sacroiliitis are subchondral T2 hyperintensity during developmental age, periarticular sclerosis in healthy subjects, or osteitis condensans ilii, and several pathological conditions that may mimic AxSpA, some of which are more frequently found in women. Conclusions. The described diagnostic challenges impose a multidisciplinary approach combining imaging findings with clinical and laboratory data.

Reported cases of linear lichen planus following multiple Blaschko's lines are rare. Herein, we present a middle-aged female patient who had unilateral lesions of linear lichen planus that followed Blaschko's lines in three different sites of the body. The only history given was previous triple immunization against COVID-19 with the Pfizer vaccine and backache with right-sided trochanteric pain over the past year. Interestingly enough, during the diagnostic process, raised serum angiotensin-converting enzyme (SACE) was revealed along with signs of sacroiliitis and trochanteric bursitis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) may also experience extraintestinal manifestations (EIMs), which can affect various organ systems, and their occurrence is based on disease activity. Objectives: To determine the prevalence of EIMs and their most common types among IBD patients from Saudi Arabia. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study included all IBD patients aged 14–80 years who visited the Gastroenterology and Hepatology clinics at King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh, between February 2017 and December 2022. The collected data included demographic characteristics, disease characteristics, EIMs, and treatment. Results: The study included 578 IBD patients, of which 65 (11.2%) had at least one EIM, with primary sclerosing cholangitis (46.2%) and sacroiliitis (16.9%) being the most common. Patients with ulcerative colitis were more likely to have EIMs than those with Crohn’s disease (15.1% vs. 9%; P = 0.026). Patients with ileocolonic (L3) Crohn’s disease reported a higher prevalence of EIMs (7.5%) than those with other disease locations (P = 0.012), while in patients with ulcerative colitis, those with extensive colitis (E3) reported higher prevalence of EIMs (19.2%) (P = 0.001). Patients receiving 6 MP had a significantly high prevalence of EIMs (P = 0.014). Conclusion: The prevalence of extraintestinal manifestations among IBD patients in Saudi Arabia is 11.2%. These findings suggest the need for clinicians to screen for EIMs and manage them early. Further research is needed to understand the mechanisms underlying EIMs for the development of more effective treatments.

Aaron Calodney,1 Nomen Azeem,2 Patrick Buchanan,3 Ioannis Skaribas,4 Ajay Antony,5 Christopher Kim,6 George Girardi,7 Chau Vu,8 Christopher Bovinet,9 Rainer Vogel,10 Sean Li,11 Navdeep Jassal,12 Youssef Josephson,13 Timothy Lubenow,14 Christopher M Lam,15 Timothy R Deer6 1Precision Spine Care, Tyler, TX, USA; 2Florida Spine and Pain Specialists, Tampa, FL, USA; 3Spanish Hills Interventional Pain Specialists, Camarillo, CA, USA; 4Expert Pain P.A, Houston, TX, USA; 5The Orthopaedic Institute, Gainesville, FL, USA; 6The Spine and Nerve Center, Charleston, WV, USA; 7Front Range Pain Medicine, Fort Collins, CO, USA; 8Evolve Restoration Center, Santa Rosa, CA, USA; 9The Spine Center of Southeast Georgia, Brunswick, GA, USA; 10Comprehensive and Interventional Pain Management, Henderson, NV, USA; 11Premier Pain Centers, Shrewsbury, NJ, USA; 12Excel Pain and Spine, Lakeland, FL, USA; 13The Pain Management Center, Voorhees Township, NJ, USA; 14Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA; 15University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USACorrespondence: Aaron Calodney, Precision Spine Care, Tyler, TX, USA, Email aaroncalodney@me.comIntroduction: Research suggests that sacroiliac joint (SIJ) dysfunction is responsible for 15% to 30% of reported low back pain cases. Recently, there has been an increasing interest in SIJ fusion using minimally invasive surgery (MIS) due to safety. Initially, devices designed for MIS were intended for lateral approaches. A minimally invasive sacroiliac fusion implant for use with a posterior approach has been developed and is regulated for clinical use under the regulatory framework required for human cells, tissues, or cellular or tissue-based products (HCT/Ps).Methods: A multi-center, prospective, single-arm study was launched after initial studies provided preliminary data to support safety, efficacy, and durability of this minimally invasive sacroiliac posterior fusion LinQ allograft implant (NCT04423120). Preliminary results were reported previously. Final results for the full participant cohort are presented here.Results: One-hundred and fifty-nine (159) participants were enrolled across 16 investigational sites in the US between January 2020 and March 2022. One-hundred and twenty-two (122) participants were implanted. At the 1-month follow-up, 82 participants satisfied all criteria for the composite responder endpoint, representing 73.2% of the study cohort. These results stayed consistent across the remaining study timepoints with 66.0%, 74.4%, and 73.5% of participants classified as responders at the 3-, 6- and 12-month follow-up visits, respectively. VAS scores were significantly reduced (p < 0.0001) and ODI scores were significantly improved (p < 0.0001). All domains of the PROMIS-29 were also significantly improved (all p’s < 0.0001). Only one procedure-related serious AE was reported in the study.Conclusion: These results suggest that the posterior approach LinQ Implant System is a safe and effective treatment for sacroiliac joint dysfunction at 12 months, with results that are favorable compared to outcomes reported for an FDA-cleared lateral approach.Keywords: sacroiliac joint disease, sacroiliac fusion, single point posterior fusion, back pain, minimally invasive spine surgery, sacroiliitis

Background: Axial spondyloarthropathy(AS) is a chronic inflammatory disease primarily affecting the axial skeleton, often characterized by sacroiliitis. While pulmonary embolism (PE), a potentially lethal condition, has been linked to several autoimmune diseases, limited data exist regarding PE risk among patients with AS. Methods: This retrospective cohort study utilized the Clalit Healthcare Services (CHS) database, including 5825 patients with AS and 28,356 matched controls. Follow-up began at the date of first AS diagnosis for patients and at the matched patient's diagnosis date for controls and continued until PE diagnosis, death, or study end date. Results: Prevalence of PE before AS diagnosis in patients compared to controls was 0.4% vs. 0.2% (p < 0.01). The incidence rate of PE was 11.6 per 10,000 person-years for patients with AS and 6.8 per 10,000 person-years for controls. The adjusted hazard ratio (HR) for PE in patients with AS was 1.70 (p < 0.001). Subgroup analysis demonstrated excess risk for PE in patients with AS regardless of gender and age, with variations among AS treatment categories. Discussion: Our findings highlight a significant association between AS and PE, indicating an increased risk in patients with AS independent of age and sex and suggests a subclinical level of inflammation. Preliminary results suggest a protective role of immunosuppressing drugs. Further research into the impact of treatment strategies should be conducted and could inform clinical management and reduce the life-threatening risk of PE in Patients with AS. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: In our study, we investigated the presence of subclinical enthesitis by ultrasonography (US) in asymptomatic patients with enthesitis-related arthritis (ERA) and sacroiliitis associated with familial Mediterranean fever (FMF). Methods: A total of 50 patients, including 35 patients with ERA and 15 with sacroiliitis associated with FMF, were included in the study. All patients were evaluated with US by a paediatric radiologist. Enthesis of seven tendons (common extensor and flexor tendons, quadriceps tendon, proximal and distal patellar tendon, Achilles tendon, and plantar fascia) was examined on both sides. Results: Subclinical enthesitis was detected in 10 ERA (28.5%) and three FMF (20%) patients. Enthesitis was radiologically diagnosed in 16 (2.3%) out of 700 evaluated entheseal sites. The most frequent sites of enthesitis were Achilles (37.5%) and quadriceps (31.3%) tendons. All patients were in clinical remission and had no active complaints, and acute phase reactants were within normal limits. Therefore, the patients were followed up without treatment change. However, disease flare-up was observed in three of these patients (23.1%) during the follow-up, and their treatments were intensified. Conclusions: Our results showed that the US can be particularly helpful in detecting subclinical enthesitis and predicting disease flare-ups. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Le rhumatisme psoriasique axial a de nombreuses caractéristiques en commun avec la spondyloarthrite axiale, mais il s'en distingue par certains aspects qui lui sont spécifiques. Il présente notamment des différences radiographiques et cliniques par rapport à la spondyloarthrite axiale. L'imagerie montre généralement des syndesmophytes asymétriques touchant essentiellement le rachis cervical, ainsi que, moins fréquemment, une sacro-iliite. Le rhumatisme psoriasique axial se manifeste à un âge plus avancé et est associé à une rachialgie inflammatoire moins sévère que dans le cas de la spondyloarthrite axiale. L'axe interleukine-23/interleukine-17 est au cœur de la pathogenèse des deux maladies, mais des thérapies ciblant ces cytokines ont obtenu des réponses différentes. Les inhibiteurs de l'interleukine-23, qui ne sont pas efficaces dans la spondyloarthrite axiale, pourraient l'être dans le rhumatisme psoriasique. Des analyses post hoc de résultats d'essais cliniques menés sur les inhibiteurs de l'interleukine-23 dans le rhumatisme psoriasique ont récemment suggéré une efficacité possible dans le rhumatisme psoriasique axial et de nouvelles études devraient être conduites pour évaluer cette hypothèse. Par ailleurs, des critères de classification du rhumatisme psoriasique axial et des outils plus adaptés pour évaluer la réponse thérapeutique sont nécessaires. Axial psoriatic arthritis (axPsA) has considerable overlap with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) but has some unique features that sometimes preclude classification into axSpA. It has some clinical and radiographic differences compared to axSpA. Imaging typically shows asymmetric syndesmophytes, mainly in the cervical spine, with less frequent sacroiliitis. It more commonly presents later in life and is associated with less severe inflammatory back pain than axSpA. The interleukin (IL) IL-23/IL-17 axis is central to the pathogenesis of both diseases. However, the response to therapies targeting these cytokines has been different. IL-23 inhibitors are ineffective in axSpA but may be effective in psoriatic arthritis (PsA). Recent post hoc analyses of clinical trial data with IL-23 inhibitors in PsA have raised the possibility of their efficacy in axPsA and need evaluation in future clinical trials. Moreover, there is a need for classification criteria for axPsA and better tools to assess therapeutic response. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Clinical management of sacroiliac disease has proven challenging from both diagnostic and therapeutic perspectives. Although it is widely regarded as a common source of low back pain, little consensus exists on the appropriate clinical management of sacroiliac joint pain and dysfunction. Understanding the biomechanics, innervation, and function of this complex load bearing joint is critical to formulating appropriate treatment algorithms for SI joint disorders. ASPN has developed this comprehensive practice guideline to serve as a foundational reference on the appropriate management of SI joint disorders utilizing the best available evidence and serve as a foundational guide for the treatment of adult patients in the United States and globally. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) sensitivity and specificity seem to be less studied in enthesitis-related arthritis (ERA). We aimed to determine the ability of sacroiliac MRI to diagnose ERA patients. We conducted a retrospective study including 44 patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). Each patient had a sacroiliac joint MRI. We divided patients into two groups: G1 patients with ERA and G2 patients with non-ERA subtype. ERA was noted in 61% of the cases. Sacroiliac joints were painful in 15 patients (34%). MRI was normal in 25 patients (57%) (G1:11 versus G2:14) and showed bone marrow edema in the sacroiliac joints in 19 patients (34%) (G1 = 16 versus G2 = 3, p = 0.005). Sacroiliac joints MRI's sensitivity and specificity in the ERA diagnosis were 61.54% and 82.35%, respectively. Positive and negative predictive values were 84.21% and 58.33%, respectively. Furthermore, sacroiliac joint pain in the clinical examination was able to predict sacroiliac bone edema in MRI with an odds ratio of 6.8 (95% CI 1.68–28.09; p = 0.006). Our study showed that sacroiliac joint MRI has good specificity and positive predictive value in the diagnosis of ERA patients among JIA patients. This underlines the usefulness of sacroiliac joint MRI in the early diagnosis of ERA patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]