Search

Lead poisoning in children has the potential for devastating neurodevelopmental consequences. There is significant socioeconomic disparity in children with lead poisoning. Specific lead chelation regimens have been approved for children by the US Food and Drug Administration, however in the United States, there has been a recent national shortage of the primary therapy, edetate calcium disodium (CaNa2 EDTA). This case report presents a 23-month-old child with severe symptomatic lead poisoning during a national shortage of CaNa2 EDTA to highlight the need for advocacy regarding critical medication shortages, especially for antidote therapy. The infant's initial blood lead level was 364 mcg/dL and he received a continuous infusion of CaNa2 EDTA (1000 mg/m 2 /day), as well as dimercaprol (4 mg/kg intramuscularly every 4 hours). The supply of CaNa2 EDTA was exhausted on day 3 of therapy so he was transitioned to enteral succimer monotherapy. Initial parenteral therapy of 72 hours achieved a lead level of 72 mcg/dL; he then completed his enteral course of succimer along with environmental mitigation. However, elevated blood lead levels persisted and he subsequently required 3 more courses of enteral succimer, and he continues to have detectable blood lead levels 2 years after initial presentation. In the face of medication shortages including CaNa2 EDTA, and now also dimercaprol, clinicians must create and study alternative chelation therapy regimens for pediatric lead toxicity. Furthermore, public policy initiatives, including the development of a national supply stockpile of chelation agents, must be created in order to minimize supply chain disruption and ensure adequate and equitable antidote therapy for lead poisoning outbreaks., Competing Interests: Disclosure. The authors declare no conflicts or financial interest in any product or service mentioned in the manuscript, including grants, equipment, medications, employment, gifts, and honoraria. The authors had full access to all patient information in this report and take full responsibility for the integrity and accuracy of the report., (Copyright. Pediatric Pharmacy Association. All rights reserved. For permissions, email: membership@pediatricpharmacy.org.)

Objective: To evaluate an institutional practice change from an extracorporeal life support (ECLS) anticoagulation monitoring strategy of activated clotting time (ACT) alone to a multimodal strategy including ACT, activated partial thrombin time, heparin anti-factor-Xa, and thromboelastography., Methods: This was a retrospective review of patients younger than 18 years on ECLS and heparin between January 2014 and June 2020 at a single institution., Results: Twenty-seven patients used an ACT-directed strategy and 25 used a multimodal strategy. The ACT-directed group was on ECLS for a shorter median duration than the multimodal group (136 versus 164 hours; p = 0.046). There was a non-significant increase in major hemorrhage (85.1% versus 60%; p = 0.061) and a significantly higher incidence of central nervous system (CNS) hemorrhage in the ACT-directed group (29.6% versus 0%; p = 0.004). Rates of thrombosis were similar, with a median of 3 circuit changes per group (p = 0.921). The ACT-directed group had larger median heparin doses (55 versus 34 units/kg/hr; p < 0.001), required more dose adjustments per day (3.8 versus 1.7; p < 0.001), and had higher rates of heparin doses >50 units/kg/hr (62.9% versus 16%; p = 0.001). More anticoagulation parameters were supratherapeutic (p = 0.015) and fewer were therapeutic (p < 0.001) in the ACT-directed group., Conclusions: Patients with a multimodal strategy for monitoring anticoagulation during ECLS had lower rates of CNS hemorrhage and decreased need for large heparin doses of >50 units/kg/hr without an increase in clotting complications, compared with ACT-directed anticoagulation. Multimodal anticoagulation monitoring appears superior to ACT-only strategies and may reduce heparin exposure and risk of hemorrhagic complications for pediatric patients on ECLS., Competing Interests: Disclosures. The authors declare no conflicts or financial interest in any product or service mentioned in the manuscript, including grants, equipment, medications, employment, gifts, and honoraria. The authors had full access to all the data in the study and take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis., (Copyright. Pediatric Pharmacy Association. All rights reserved. For permissions, email: membership@pediatricpharmacy.org 2022.)

Objective: Asthma is the most common chronic disease of childhood. Although asthma admissions to the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) are increasing, there are no evidence-based guidelines on preferred escalation of therapies for patients with status asthmaticus who fail to respond to inhaled bronchodilators and systemic corticosteroids. The purpose of this study was to assess outcomes of PICU patients receiving aminophylline versus terbutaline as second-tier therapies for status asthmaticus., Design: Retrospective cohort study using Pediatric Health Information System from 2016-2019., Setting: Fifty-three tertiary children's hospitals., Subjects: Children aged 2 to 18 years admitted to the PICU in children's hospitals contributing data to the Pediatric Health Information System with a primary diagnosis of status asthmaticus., Interventions: None., Measurements and Main Results: Of 11 133 pediatric patients treated for status asthmaticus in the PICU during the study period, 1144 received either terbutaline or aminophylline. There was no difference in intubation and mechanical ventilation between patients who received aminophylline and those who received terbutaline. However, in African American patients, those who received terbutaline had a significantly higher odds of intubation and mechanical ventilation compared to those who received aminophylline (OR, 12.41; 95%CI, 1.61,95)., Conclusions: The use of aminophylline is associated with lower odds of intubation and mechanical ventilation in African American patients with status asthmaticus as compared to terbutaline., (© 2020 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)