Search

We explored the impact of luspatercept therapy on overall survival (OS) and possible predictors of response in low-risk (LR) myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) patients. We evaluated 331 anemic patients treated with luspatercept. Hematological response (HI) was defined as (i) hemoglobin (Hb) increase of ≥1.5 g/dL in nontransfusion-dependent (NTD) patients, and (ii) red blood cell (RBC) transfusion independence (TI) with a concomitant Hb increase of ≥1.5 g/dL, or RBC-TI without an Hb increase of 1.5 g/dL, or >50% reduction in RBC transfusion burden (TB) for TD patients. Response was observed in 166 patients (50.2%), with significantly higher response in NTD and low TB versus high TB patients ( p  < 0.001). A significant correlation between lower Molecular International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS-M) risk scores and response was observed. No statistically significant difference in HI was found in SF3B1- mutated versus wild-type MDS patients (53.8% vs. 40.1%, respectively). SF3B1 mut hotspots (K700E vs. others) and variant allele frequencies (VAFs; <38% VAF vs. ≥38% VAF) did not impact on HI. SF3B1- mutated MDS with del5q showed inferior HI compared to other LR-MDS ( p  = 0.046). The median treatment duration overall was 35 weeks (20.86-90.29), the median time to response was 11 weeks (8.71-21.86), and the median duration of response was 65 weeks (26.5-114). After a median follow-up of 13 months, median OS was not reached (NR) for responders and 24 months for nonresponders (hazard ratio [HR] 0.25, 95% confidence interval 0.14-0.44, p  < 0.001). This analysis of 331 luspatercept real-life-treated LR-MDS patients demonstrated a significant OS benefit upon luspatercept response. Low baseline RBC-TB and lower risk IPSS-M scores correlated with higher HI and could constitute predictive markers of response., Competing Interests: The authors declare the following competing financial interests: V. S. has participated in advisory boards for Abbvie, Ascentage, BMS, Geron, Jazz, Keros, Novartis, Servier, and Syros, and has received travel grants from Abbvie and Jazz. R. K. has received consulting fees from Geron; has received research funding from Bristol Myers Squibb; has participated in advisory boards for AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb, CTI Biopharma, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Novartis, PharmaEssentia, Rigel, Servio, and Taiho; and has received payment for speakers bureaus from AbbVie, CTI Biopharma, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, PharmaEssentia, and Servio. O. C. has worked for BMS and has received research funding from AbbVie and Jazz. M. G. D. P. has participated in advisory boards for BMS. E. P. has participated in advisory boards for BMS, GSK, Stemline, SoBi, Pharmaessentia, and Taiho and has received research funding from BMS and Incyte. D. A. S. has participated in consulting or advisory roles for Celyad, Agios, Abbvie, Aprea AB, Bristol‐Myers Squibb, Gilead Sciences, Intellia Therapeutics, Kite Pharma, Magenta Therapeutics, Novartis, and Syndax Speakers' Bureau for Agios, Incyte, and Bristol‐Myers Squibb; and has received research funding from Celgene and Jazz Pharmaceuticals. A. K. has participated as a consultant for MorphoSys, Abbvie, Karyopharm, Protagonist, and GSK and has received Honoraria from Incyte, Silence Therapeutics, Imago Biosciences, GSK, and BMS, as well as research support from Novartis, Geron, Janssen, GSK, BMS, Protagonist, and Blueprint., (© 2025 The Author(s). HemaSphere published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Hematology Association.)

Background/aims: Randomized clinical trials often use stratification to ensure balance between arms. Analysis of primary endpoints of these trials typically uses a "stratified analysis," in which analyses are performed separately in each subgroup defined by the stratification factors, and those separate analyses are weighted and combined. In the phase 3 setting, stratified analyses based on a small number of stratification factors can provide a small increase in power. The impact on power and type-1 error of stratification in the setting of smaller sample sizes as in randomized phase 2 trials has not been well characterized., Methods: We performed computational studies to characterize the power and cross-arm balance of modestly sized clinical trials (less than 170 patients) with varying numbers of stratification factors (0-6), sample sizes, randomization ratios (1:1 vs 2:1), and randomization methods (dynamic balancing vs stratified block)., Results: We found that the power of unstratified analyses was minimally impacted by the number of stratification factors used in randomization. Analyses stratified by 1-3 factors maintained power over 80%, while power dropped below 80% when four or more stratification factors were used. These trends held regardless of sample size, randomization ratio, and randomization method. For a given randomization ratio and sample size, increasing the number of factors used in randomization had an adverse impact on cross-arm balance. Stratified block randomization performed worse than dynamic balancing with respect to cross-arm balance when three or more stratification factors were used., Conclusion: Stratified analyses can decrease power in the setting of phase 2 trials when the number of patients in a stratification subgroup is small., Competing Interests: Declaration of conflicting interestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Significance: This work identifies MALAT1 as a requisite downstream effector of oncogenic feedforward inflammatory circuits necessary for the development of TET2-mutated CH and fulminant myeloid malignancy. We elucidate a novel mechanism by which MALAT1 "shields" p65 from dephosphorylation to potentiate this circuit and nominate MALAT1 inhibition as a future therapeutic strategy., (©2024 American Association for Cancer Research.)

Myelodysplastic neoplasms/syndromes (MDS) are a heterogeneous group of biologically distinct entities characterized by variable degrees of ineffective hematopoiesis. Recently, 2 classification systems (the 5th edition of the World Health Organization Classification of Haematolymphoid tTumours and the International Consensus Classification) further subcharacterized MDS into morphologically and genetically defined groups. Accurate diagnosis and subclassification of MDS require a multistep systemic approach. The International Consortium for MDS (icMDS) summarizes a contemporary, practical, and multimodal approach to MDS diagnosis and classification., (Copyright © 2024 United States & Canadian Academy of Pathology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Competing Interests: Competing interests DT received research funding from Sobi, Sumitomo, Cogent Biosciences and Gilead and honoraria from Sobi, Novartis, AbbVie, PharmaEssentia, Sierra Oncology, GSK and Cogent Biosciences. CDD received honoraria from Abbvie, AstraZeneca, BMS, Genentech, GenMab, GSK, Immunogen, Notable Labs, Rigel, Schrodinger, and Servier and grant support from LLS Scholar in Research Award. TMK received research funding from AbbVie and Genentech and honoraria from AbbVie. FR received research funding from AbbVie and BMS and honoraria from AbbVie and BMS. AM received research funding from BMS, Incyte and Novartis. AA received research funding from Novartis, BMS, Onconova, Medimmune, Ariad, GSK, Celgene, Eisai, ALX Oncology, H3B Biomedicine/Hemavant. MK has received honoraria from Protagonist, Silence Therapeutics, Morphosys, Incyte, AbbVie and Kura. JF received research funding from Oryzon Genomics, Taiho Oncology, and Syros. RK received research funding from BMS and honoraria from Abbvie, BMS, DSI, Geron, Janssen, Jazz, PharmaEssentia, Rigel, Servio, Sobi, and Sumitomo. JM received research funding from Incyte, BMS, Novartis, Abbvie, Geron, Kartos, Karyopharm, Sobi and PharmaEssentia and honoraria from Incyte, BMS, Abbvie, Kartos, Geron, GSK, Roche, Merck, Pfizer, PharmaEssentia, MorphoSys, Novartis, Galecto, Sobi, Sumitomo, and Karyopharm. EP received research funding from Incyte, BMS, and Blueprint and honoraria from BMS, GSK, Sobi, Blueprint, Taiho, PharmaEssentia. DAS received research funding from Aprea and Jazz and honoraria from AbbVie, Aprea, Agios, Celyad, Froghorn, Gilead,Incyte, Intellisphere LLC, Kite, Megenta, Novartis, AvenCell, Astellas, BlueBird Bio, BMS, Dark Blue Therapeutics, Intellia, Jasper Therapeutics, Kite, Magenta Therapeutics, NKARTA, Novartis, Orbital Therapeutics, Rigel Pharmaceuticals, Shattuck Labs, Servier, Syndax, and Syros. MMP received research funding from Stemline, Kura Oncology, Solu Therapeutics, Epigenetix and Polaris Pharmaceuticals. GMB received research funding from IFM Therapeutics, Takeda Oncology, Solu Theraputics. The remaining of the authors have no potential competing interests to disclose. Ethics approval and consent to participate This study received approval by the Institutional Review Boards from all participating institutions and research was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Given the retrospective nature of this analysis, informed consent was not required by local regulatory authorities.

The WHO and International Consensus Classification 2022 classifications of myelodysplastic syndromes enhance diagnostic precision and refine decision-making processes in these diseases. However, some discrepancies still exist and potentially cause inconsistency in their adoption in a clinical setting. We adopted a data-driven approach to provide a harmonisation between these two classification systems. We investigated the importance of genomic features and their effect on the cluster assignment process to define harmonised entity labels. A panel of expert haematologists, haematopathologists, and data scientists who are members of the International Consortium for Myelodysplastic Syndromes was formed and a modified Delphi consensus process was adopted to harmonise morphologically defined categories without a distinct genomic profile. The panel held regular online meetings and participated in a two-round survey using an online voting tool. We identified nine clusters with distinct genomic features. The cluster of highest hierarchical importance was characterised by biallelic TP53 inactivation. Cluster assignment was irrespective of blast count. Individuals with monoallelic TP53 inactivation were assigned to other clusters. Hierarchically, the second most important group included myelodysplastic syndromes with del(5q). Isolated del(5q) and less than 5% of blast cells in the bone marrow were the most relevant label-defining features. The third most important cluster included myelodysplastic syndromes with mutated SF3B1. The absence of isolated del(5q), del(7q)/-7, abn3q26.2, complex karyotype, RUNX1 mutations, or biallelic TP53 were the basis for a harmonised label of this category. Morphologically defined myelodysplastic syndrome entities showed large genomic heterogeneity that was not efficiently captured by single-lineage versus multilineage dysplasia, marrow blasts, hypocellularity, or fibrosis. We investigated the biological continuum between myelodysplastic syndromes with more than 10% bone marrow blasts and acute myeloid leukaemia, and found only a partial overlap in genetic features. After the survey, myelodysplastic syndromes with low blasts (ie, less than 5%) and myelodysplastic syndromes with increased blasts (ie, 5% or more) were recognised as disease entities. Our data-driven approach can efficiently harmonise current classifications of myelodysplastic syndromes and provide a reference for patient management in a real-world setting., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests UG reports speaker honoraria from Novartis, AbbVie, and BMS; and institutional research support from BMS, AbbVie, and Jazz Pharmaceuticals. FE reports consultancy or advisory roles for AbbVie, Incyte, Syros, Novartis, and Jazz Pharmaceuticals. SH reports research support from STORM Therapeutics and AstraZeneca. EAG reports honoraria from AAMDS, MedscapeLIVE!, MediCom Worldwide, MJH Life Sciences, ASH, MDS International Foundation, and Physicians’ Education Resource; consulting fees from AbbVie, Alexion, Apellis, Takeda Oncology, Astex/Taiho Oncology, Alexion/AstraZeneca Rare Disease, Celgene/BMS, CTI BioPharma, Novartis, Partner Therapeutics, Picnic Health, and Servier; and research funding from Alexion, Apellis, Astex /Otsuka/Taiho Oncology, Blueprint Medicines, Celldex Therapeutics, Genentech, and NextCure. MAS reports participation on advisory boards for BMS, Kurome, Schrödinger, and Karyopharm. MD-C reports participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board for BMS, Novartis, Blueprint Medicines, GSK, Agios, Hemavan, Syros, Keros, Curis, and Astex/Otsuka; and payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers’ bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events for BMS, Novartis, and Keros. UP reports research support and honoraria from BMS, Geron, Curis, AbbVie, and Janssen. RBe reports employment or equity from Aptose Biosciences; participation on advisory boards for BMS, Servier, NeoGenomics, and Geron; being Data Monitoring Committee Chair for Gilead, Ipsen, and Keros; and consultancy for TenSixteen. YM reports honoraria from Nippon Shinyaku, BMS, Novartis, Sumitomo Pharma, Kyowa Kirin, AbbVie, Daiichi Sankyo, Takeda, Janssen, Astellas, Pfizer, Eisai, and Otsuka; and research funding from Chugai. AED reports participation on advisory boards, consultancy, or honoraria from Celgene/BMS, Agios, Novartis, Astellas, and Gilead; and participation on clinical trial committees or data safety monitoring boards for Novartis, AbbVie, Kura, Geron, Servier, Keros, and Celgene/BMS. DPS reports employment by Ajax Therapeutics; former employment by Novartis; and minor equity in Arrowhead and Bluebird. TKK reports consultancy for Agenus and ImmunoBiome. AK reports research support from Novartis and BMS; consulting fees from Alexion, Novartis, Amgen, Agios, Pfizer, Samsung, Celgene, F Hoffmann-La Roche, and Sobi; honoraria from Alexion, Novartis, Pfizer, Amgen, Samsung, Celgene, F Hoffmann-La Roche, BMS, Sobi, and Silence Therapeutics; and speakers fees from Alexion, Novartis, Amgen, Pfizer, Celgene, F Hoffmann-La Roche, and Sobi. All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.)

Venetoclax-azacitidine is the standard of treatment for unfit acute myeloid leukemia patients. In the VIALE-A study, treatment was given until progression but there are no data on its optimal duration for responding patients who do not tolerate indefinite therapy. We retrospectively analyzed the outcome of patients who discontinued venetoclax or venetoclax-azacitidine due to poor tolerance. Sixty-two newly diagnosed (ND) AML patients and 22 patients with morphological relapse or refractory AML were included. In the ND cohort (n = 62), 28 patients stopped venetoclax and azacitidine and 34 patients continued azacitidine monotherapy. With a median follow-up of 23 months (IQR, 20-32), median overall survival and treatment-free survival were 44 (IQR, 16-NR) and 16 (IQR, 8-27) months, respectively. Patients who stopped both treatments and those who continued azacitidine monotherapy had the same outcomes. Negative minimal residual disease was associated with a 2-year treatment-free survival of 80%. In the RR cohort (n = 22), median overall survival and treatment-free survival were 19 (IQR, 17-31) and 10 (IQR, 5-NR) months, respectively. Prior number of venetoclax-azacitidine cycles and IDH mutations were associated with increased overall survival. The only factor significantly impacting treatment-free survival was the number of prior cycles. This study suggests that patients who discontinued treatment in remission have favorable outcomes supporting the rationale for prospective controlled trials., (© 2024 The Author(s). American Journal of Hematology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Introduction: We aimed to compare outcomes of patients with AML treated with frontline hypomethylating agent and venetoclax (HMA + Ven) who achieved complete remission (CR), complete remission with partial hematologic recovery (CRh), complete remission with incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi), or morphologic leukemia-free state (MLFS) as defined by ELN 2022., Methods: Patients with AML seen at Moffitt Cancer Center between 2018 and 2022 and treated with HMA + Ven were retrospectively evaluated., Results: About 120 patients achieved blast clearance with best response of CR in 52 (43.3%), CRh in 22 (18.3%), CRi in 31 (25.8%) and MLFS in 15 (12.5%) patients. Greater proportion of patients with MLFS had a prior myeloid malignancy (p = 0.003) and were treated with prior HMA (p < 0.001). Patients that achieved MLFS as their best response had inferior OS compared to the CR/CRh/CRi cohort (8 months vs. 27 months; p < 0.001). RFS was also worse for the MLFS cohort., Conclusion: To the best of our knowledge, this is the largest study analyzing differences in outcomes of AML patients treated with HMA + Ven based on best response. We noted that prior myeloid malignancy and use of HMA led to more MLFS as best response compared to CR/CRi. The OS and RFS were inferior for MLFS cohort., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Despite advances in the treatment paradigm of patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML), TP53 mutated AML represents a molecular subgroup that has failed to improve with an overall survival around 6 months that is independent of age and fitness. Notably, there has been significant elucidation in understanding the biology of the disease and key advancements in the classification and prognostication of these patients. International collaborative efforts of novel clinical interventions are urgently needed to change the standard of care., (Copyright © 2024 American Society of Hematology.)

Abstract: Ivosidenib is a first-in-class mutant isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (mIDH1) inhibitor with efficacy and tolerability in patients with advanced mIDH1 hematologic malignancies, leading to approval in frontline and relapsed/refractory (R/R) mIDH1 acute myeloid leukemia. We report final data from a phase 1 single-arm substudy of once-daily ivosidenib in patients with R/R mIDH1 myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) after failure of standard-of-care therapies. Primary objectives were to determine safety, tolerability, and clinical activity. The primary efficacy end point was the complete remission (CR) + partial remission (PR) rate. Nineteen patients were enrolled; 18 were included in the efficacy analysis. Treatment-related adverse events occurred in 8 (42.1%) patients, including a grade 1 QT interval prolongation in 1 (5.3%) patient and grade 2 differentiation syndrome in 2 (10.5%) patients. Rates of CR + PR and objective response (CR + PR + marrow CR) were 38.9% (95% confidence interval [CI], 17.3-64.3) and 83.3% (95% CI, 58.6-96.4), respectively. Kaplan-Meier estimates showed a 68.6% probability of patients in CR achieving a remission duration of ≥5 years, and a median overall survival of 35.7 months. Of note, 71.4% and 75.0% baseline red blood cell (RBC)- and platelet-transfusion-dependent patients, respectively, became transfusion independent (TI; no transfusion for ≥56 days); 81.8% and 100% of baseline RBC and platelet TI patients, respectively, remained TI. One (5.3%) patient proceeded to a hematopoietic stem cell transplant. In conclusion, ivosidenib is clinically active, with durable remissions and a manageable safety profile observed in these patients. This trial was registered at www.ClinicalTrials.gov as #NCT02074839., (© 2024 by The American Society of Hematology. Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), permitting only noncommercial, nonderivative use with attribution. All other rights reserved.)

The patterns of low-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) progression and the clinical and molecular features of those patterns have not been well described. We divided our low-risk (LR) MDS patients (N=1,914) into 4 cohorts: 1) patients who remained LR-MDS (LR-LR; N=1,300; 68%), 2) patients who progressed from LR to high-risk (HR) MDS (LR-HR) without transformation into acute myeloid leukemia (AML) (N=317; 16.5%), 3) patients who progressed from LR to HR MDS and then AML (LR-HR-AML; N=124; 6.5%), and 4) patients who progressed from LR MDS directly to AML (LR-AML; N=173; 9%). Risk factors for progression included: male gender, low absolute neutrophil count (ANC), low platelet count, high bone marrow (BM) blasts, ferritin >1000 mcg/L, albumin <3.5 g/dL, multi-lineage dysplasia (MLD), and lack of ring sideroblasts. Among patients with marked BM fibrosis (N=49), 18% progressed directly to AML. Somatic mutations (SM) associated with an increased risk of direct or indirect AML progression included SRSF2 and NRAS. SM in IDH1, IDH2 and NPM1 were more common in patients with direct AML transformation. SM associated with progression to higher risk disease only, without AML transformation, were ASXL1, TP53, RUNX1, and CBL. SF3B1 mutation was associated with less progression. About 171 patients (13.1% of all LR-LR patients) died within two years of diagnosis of LR-MDS without disease progression. Among the 61 cases with documented cause of death, 18 patients (29.5%) died from cytopenia and MDS-related complications. Identifying patterns of disease progression of LR MDS patients and their predictive factors will be crucial to be able to tailor therapy accordingly.

Dasatinib is one of the second generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) which is approved for the treatment of patients with chronic phase CML (CP-CML) both in the front line and in the second line setting. Pleural effusion (PE) is a unique toxicity associated with dasatinib use. Our aim was to study the incidence of pleural effusion in our cohort of patients who were treated with dasatinib for CP-CML and the safety upon TKI switch. A total of 390 patients were treated with dasatinib during their course of treatment for CP-CML. A total of 69 patients (17.6%) developed any grade of PE. About 33 (48%) patients developed CTCAE grade 2 PE, 34 (49%) grade 3 and only 1 patient developed grade 4 PE. Recurrence of PE was observed in 34 (49%) patients. While only 12 patients (17.3%) continued using dasatinib after development of PE, dasatinib was discontinued in the other 57 patients. Therapy was switched to bosutinib in 13 patients out of which 6 (46%) patients re-developed PE. While only 12.5% patients developed re-accumulation of pleural fluid in patients switched to imatinib, none of the patients switched to nilotinib re-developed PE. A change in TKI to bosutinib was associated with a 46% risk of recurrence of PE in patients who develop PE on dasatinib for the treatment of CP-CML. The incidence of recurrent PE was markedly lower in patient switched to imatinib or nilotinib., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: Hypomethylating agent + venetoclax is an effective frontline combination for acute myeloid leukemia, but its efficacy and safety in post-allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (alloHCT) relapse remain underexplored. Outcomes have been poor for this population, with no standard treatment., Patients and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 72 Ven-naïve patients who received hypomethylating agents + venetoclax at relapse following alloHCT and aimed to evaluate the rates of complete remission with or without hematologic recovery (CR/CRi) and minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity, CR/CRi duration, and overall survival. We leveraged our larger sample to analyze the impact of cytogenetic/molecular features on the odds of CR/CRi., Results: CR/CRi was achieved among 32 of 67 (48%) patients, and MRD negativity was recorded among 10 of 12. NPM1 and IDH 1 or 2 mutations increased the odds of CR/CRi, as did increasing time from alloHCT to relapse. Fourteen patients subsequently received donor lymphocyte infusions or a second alloHCT. Responses lasted a median of 17.8 months (95% CI, 7.2 months to not reached), and responders had a greater median overall survival of 19.7 months (95% CI, 7.6-51.5 months) compared to 2.9 months among nonresponders (95% CI, 1.8-4.4 months; log-rank P < .01). Treatment was well tolerated, but prolonged cytopenias were common and most patients required reduction in the number of venetoclax days per cycle., Conclusion: These data support the efficacy of this combination in the alloHCT relapse setting where we report responses among nearly half of patients, with possibly greater benefit for NPM1 and IDH 1/2-mutated cases. These responses can be durable and profound as evidenced by conversion to MRD negativity., Competing Interests: Disclosures Authors reports no conflicts of interest. The study received no external funding., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

TP53 mutations are found in 5%-10% of de novo myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and AML cases. By contrast, in therapy related MDS and AML, mutations in TP53 are found in up to 30%-40% of patients. The majority of inactivating mutations observed in MDS and AML are missense mutations localized in a few prevalent hotspots. TP53 missense mutations together with truncating mutations or chromosomal loss of TP53 determine a loss-of-function effect on normal p53 function. Clonal expansion of TP53 -mutant clones is observed under the selection pressure of chemotherapy or MDM2 inhibitor therapy. TP53 -mutant clones are resistant to current chemotherapy, and when responses to treatment have been observed, they have correlated poorly with overall survival. The most heavily investigated and targeted agent for patients with TP53- mutant MDS and AML has been APR-246 (eprenetapopt) a p53 reactivator, in combination with azacitidine, but also in triplets with venetoclax. Despite positive results in phase II trials, a phase III trial did not confirm superior response or improved survival. Other agents, like magrolimab (anti-CD47 antibody), failed to demonstrate improved activity in TP53 -mutant MDS and AML. Agents whose activity is not dependent on a functional apoptosis system like anti-CD123 antibodies or cellular therapies are in development and may hold promises. Delivering prognostic information in a dismal disease like TP53 -mutated MDS and AML is particularly challenging. The physician should balance hope and realism, describing the trajectory of possible treatments and at the same time indicating the poor outcome, together with promoting adaptive coping in patients and elaborating on the nature of the disease.

Notable treatment advances have been made in recent years for patients with myelodysplastic syndromes/neoplasms (MDS), and several new drugs are under development. For example, the emerging availability of oral MDS therapies holds the promise of improving patients' health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Within this rapidly evolving landscape, the inclusion of HRQoL and other patient-reported outcomes (PROs) is critical to inform the benefit/risk assessment of new therapies or to assess whether patients live longer and better, for what will likely remain a largely incurable disease. We provide practical considerations to support investigators in generating high-quality PRO data in future MDS trials. We first describe several challenges that are to be thoughtfully considered when designing an MDS-focused clinical trial with a PRO endpoint. We then discuss aspects related to the design of the study, including PRO assessment strategies. We also discuss statistical approaches illustrating the potential value of time-to-event analyses and their implications within the estimand framework. Finally, based on a literature review of MDS randomized controlled trials with a PRO endpoint, we note the PRO items that deserve special attention when reporting future MDS trial results. We hope these practical considerations will facilitate the generation of rigorous PRO data that can robustly inform MDS patient care and support treatment decision-making for this patient population., Competing Interests: Fabio Efficace had consultancy or advisory role for AbbVie, Incyte, Syros, Novartis, and JAZZ Pharmaceuticals outside the submitted work. Rena Buckstein: Research funding and honoraria for advisory boards and speaking engagements from BMS, TAIHO, and Abbvie. Gregory A. Abel has consulted for Novartis and Geron outside the submitted work. Pierre Fenaux received research funding from BMS, Abbvie, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Novartis, and Janssen; and had a consultancy with and received honoraria from BMS, Abbvie, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, and Novartis. Andrew M. Brunner received consulting or advisory board honoraria from Novartis, Acceleron, Agios, Abbvie, Takeda, Celgene/BMS, Keros Therapeutics, Taiho, Gilead; and has research support from the NIH SPORE in Myeloid Malignancies, and from the Edward P. Evans Foundation. Rafael Bejar owns equity in and is employed by Aptose Biosciences; he has served as an advisor to BMS, Servier, Gilead, and Ipsen; he is on the SAB for NeoGenomics. Amy E DeZern participated in advisory boards, and/or had a consultancy with and received honoraria from Celgene/BMS, Agios, Regenergon, Sobi, Novartis, Astellas, and Gilead. Amy E. DeZern served on clinical trial committees for Novartis, Abbvie, Kura, Geron, and Celgene/BMS. Gail J. Roboz: Consultancy: Abbvie, Amgen, Astra Zeneca, Bristol‐Myers Squibb, Caribou Biosciences, Celgene, Daiichi Sankyo, Ellipses Pharma, Genoptix, Geron, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Jasper Pharmaceuticals, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Molecular Partners, Novartis, Pfizer, Oncoverity, OncoPrecision, Rigel, Roche, Syndax, Takeda (IRC Chair), Telix Pharma; and research support: Janssen. Michael R. Savona: Membership on a board or advisory committee: Bristol Myers Squibb, CTI, Forma, Geron, GSK, Karyopharm, Rigel Ryvu, Taiho, Takeda, Treadwell; patents and royalties: Boehringer Ingelheim, Empath Biosciences; research funding: ALX Oncology, Astex, Incyte, Takeda, TG Therapeutics; equity ownership: Empath Biosciences, Karyopharm, Ryvu; consultancy: Forma, Geron, Karyopharm, Ryvu. Rami Komrokji: Abbvie: Speaker Bureau, Advisory board; BMS: Research grant, Advisory board; DSI: Advisory board; Geron: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Jazz: Speaker Bureau, Advisory board; Pharma Essentia: Speaker Bureau, Advisory board; Rigel: Speaker Bureau, Advisory board; Servio: Speaker Bureau, Advisory board; Sobi: Speaker Bureau, Advisory board; Sumitomo Pharma: consultancy, Advisory board. David A. Sallman served on the advisory board or panel for Agios, Avencell, BlueBird Bio, BMS, Dark Blue, Jasper Therapeutics, Kite, Magenta Therapeutics, NKARTA, Novartis, Rigel Shattuck Labs, Servier, Syndax, Syros; and had a consultancy with AbbBie, Gilead, Molecular Partners AG, Takeda. Guillermo Sanz received honoraria, advisory board membership, or consultation fees from AbbVie, BMS, ExCellThera, Novartis, Roche, and Takeda and participated in sponsored speaker's bureau for BMS, Novartis, and Takeda. Hetty E. Carraway: Consultancy: Abbvie, Amgen, Bristol‐Myers Squibb, Celgene, Daiichi Sankyo, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Novartis, Rigel, Syndax, Servier; and research support: Celgene. Maximilian Stahl consulted for Curis Oncology and Boston Consulting; served on the advisory board for Novartis and Kymera, GSK, Rigel, and Sierra Oncology; and participated in GME activity for Novartis, Curis Oncology, Haymarket Media, and Clinical care options (CCO). Mikkael A. Sekeres has served on advisory boards for BMS, Novartis, Kurome, and Gilead. Amer M. Zeidan received research funding (institutional) from Celgene/BMS, Abbvie, Astex, Pfizer, Medimmune/Astra Zeneca, Boehringer‐Ingelheim, Cardiff oncology, Incyte, Takeda, Novartis, Aprea, and ADC Therapeutics. He participated in advisory boards, and/or had a consultancy with and received honoraria from AbbVie, Otsuka, Pfizer, Celgene/BMS, Jazz, Incyte, Agios, Boehringer‐Ingelheim, Novartis, Acceleron, Astellas, Daiichi Sankyo, Cardinal Health, Taiho, Seattle Genetics, BeyondSpring, Cardiff Oncology, Takeda, Ionis, Amgen, Janssen, Epizyme, Syndax, Gilead, Kura, Chiesi, ALX Oncology, BioCryst, Notable, Orum, and Tyme. He served on clinical trial committees for Novartis, Abbvie, Gilead, BioCryst, Abbvie, ALX Oncology, Geron, and Celgene/BMS. Fabio Efficace, Rena Buckstein, and Gregory A. Abel report being involved in the development and validation of the QUALMS, one of the PROs discussed in this paper. The QUALMS is copyrighted by Dana‐Farber Cancer Institute (DFCI) and the Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario (CHEO). The remaining authors declare no conflict of interest., (© 2024 The Authors. HemaSphere published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Hematology Association.)

Advancements in comprehending myelodysplastic neoplasms (MDS) have unfolded significantly in recent years, elucidating a myriad of cellular and molecular underpinnings integral to disease progression. While molecular inclusions into prognostic models have substantively advanced risk stratification, recent revelations have emphasized the pivotal role of immune dysregulation within the bone marrow milieu during MDS evolution. Nonetheless, immunotherapy for MDS has not experienced breakthroughs seen in other malignancies, partly attributable to the absence of an immune classification that could stratify patients toward optimally targeted immunotherapeutic approaches. A pivotal obstacle to establishing "immune classes" among MDS patients is the absence of validated accepted immune panels suitable for routine application in clinical laboratories. In response, we formed International Integrative Innovative Immunology for MDS (i4MDS), a consortium of multidisciplinary experts, and created the following recommendations for standardized methodologies to monitor immune responses in MDS. A central goal of i4MDS is the development of an immune score that could be incorporated into current clinical risk stratification models. This position paper first consolidates current knowledge on MDS immunology. Subsequently, in collaboration with clinical and laboratory specialists, we introduce flow cytometry panels and cytokine assays, meticulously devised for clinical laboratories, aiming to monitor the immune status of MDS patients, evaluating both immune fitness and identifying potential immune "risk factors." By amalgamating this immunological characterization data and molecular data, we aim to enhance patient stratification, identify predictive markers for treatment responsiveness, and accelerate the development of systems immunology tools and innovative immunotherapies., Competing Interests: Shahram Kordasti: Novartis: Advisory Board, Speakers bureau, Alexion: Speakers bureau, Beckman Coulter: Speakers bureau, MorphoSys: Research Support (none is related to this publication). Wolfgang Kern declares part‐ownership of MLL Munich Leukemia Laboratory. Austin Kulasekararaj: Research support (to institution): Celgene/BMS and Novartis. Speaker's fees: Alexion/AstraZeneca, Akari, Apellis, Celgene/BMS, Novartis, Pfizer, Ra Pharma/UCB, Roche, SOBI. Scientific advisory board: Alexion/Astra Zeneca, Apellis, Amgen, Agios, Biocryst, Celgene/BMS, Novartis, Pfizer, Regeneron, Roche, SOBI, Janssen, Samsung and Novo Nordisk (none is related to this publication)., (© 2024 The Authors. HemaSphere published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Hematology Association.)

Introduction: Azacitidine (AZA) is an approved frontline therapy for higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (HR-MDS); however, poor survival denotes unmet needs to increase depth/duration of response (DOR)., Methods: This retrospective study with patient chart review evaluated AZA effectiveness in 382 treatment-naive patients with HR-MDS from a US electronic health record (EHR)-derived database. Responses were assessed using International Working Group (IWG) 2006 criteria; real-world equivalents were derived from EHRs. Primary endpoint was IWG 2006-based complete remission rate (CRR). Secondary endpoints were EHR-based CRR, IWG 2006- and EHR-based objective response rates (ORRs), duration of CR, DOR, progression-free survival, time-to-next-treatment, and overall survival (OS)., Results: Using IWG 2006 criteria, the CRR was 7.9% (n = 30); median duration of CR was 12.0 months (95% CI, 7.7-15.6). In poor cytogenetic risk (n = 101) and TP53 mutation (n = 46) subgroups, CRRs were 7.9% (n = 8) and 8.7% (n = 4), respectively. ORR was 62.8% (n = 240), including a hematologic improvement rate (HIR) of 46.9% (n = 179). Using EHR-based data, CRR was 3.7% (n = 14); median duration of CR was 13.5 months (95% CI, 4.5-21.5). ORR was 67.8% (n = 259), including an HIR of 29.3% (n = 112). Median follow-up was 12.9 months; median OS was 17.9 months (95% CI, 15.5-21.7)., Conclusions: Consistent with other studies, CRRs and median OS with AZA in treatment-naive patients with HR-MDS were low in this large, real-world cohort. Novel agents/combinations are urgently needed to improve these outcomes in HR-MDS., Competing Interests: Disclosure N.R., S.M., S.I., M.C., and R.K. are current equity holders at Gilead Sciences Inc. and were employed by Gilead Sciences Inc. at the time of this study. A.H.W. receives institutional research funding from Abbvie, Amgen, Astex, Astra Zeneca, BMS, Novartis, Servier, and Syndax; is an employee of the Walter and Eliza Hall Institute, and is eligible for a fraction of the royalty stream related to venetoclax; serves on speaker's bureaus for Abbvie, Astellas, BMS, and Novartis; and served on advisory boards for Abbvie, Agios, Amgen, Astellas, BMS, Gilead Sciences Inc., Janssen, Macrogenics, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, and Servier. D.A.S. received consulting fees from AbbVie, Affimed, Gilead Sciences Inc., Incyte, Intellisphere, Molecular Partners, PGEN Therapeutics, Takeda, and Zentalis; served on advisory boards for AvenCell, Bluebird Bio, BMS, Intellia, Jasper Therapeutics, Kite, Magenta Therapeutics, Nkarta, Novartis, Shattuck Labs, Servier, Syndax, and Syros; and has financial or nonfinancial interests in Aprea, Jazz, and Moffit. M.G. served on advisory boards for GSK, Janssen, Karyopharm, Sanofi, and TG Therapeutics. N.G.D. receives institutional research funding from AbbVie, Amgen, Astellas, Bristol-Meyers Squibb, Daiichi-Sankyo, FATE Therapeutics, Genentech, Gilead Sciences Inc., Glycomimetics, Hanmi, ImmunoGen, Novimmune, Pfizer, Servier, Trillium, and Trovagene; and received consulting fees from AbbVie, Agios, Amgen, Arog, Astellas, Bristol-Meyers Squibb, Celgene, Daichii-Sankyo, Genentech, Gilead Sciences Inc., ImmunoGen, Jazz, Novartis, Pfizer, Servier, Shattuck Labs, Syndax, and Trillium. Y.W. has received support for the current study from Gilead Sciences Inc.; and is a current equity holder in McKesson. P.V. has received support for the current study from Gilead Sciences Inc. and Scimentum., (Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Among 210 patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDSs) with del(5q), molecular information was available at diagnosis or at least 3 months before leukaemic transformation in 146 cases. Multivariate analysis identified therapy-related setting (p = 0.02; HR 2.3) and TP53 variant allele frequency (VAF) ≥22% (p < 0.01; HR 2.8), but not SF3B1 mutation (p = 0.65), as independent risk factors for survival. Median survival was 11.7 versus 4 years (5/10-year survival 73%/52% vs. 42%/14%) in the absence (N = 112) versus presence (N = 34) of ≥1 risk factors; leukaemia-free survival was affected by TP53 VAF ≥22% (p < 0.01). Such information might inform treatment decision-making in MDS-del(5q) regarding allogeneic stem cell transplant., (© 2023 British Society for Haematology and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background: Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a heterogeneous hematological malignancy characterized by uncontrolled proliferation and impaired differentiation of myeloid cells in the bone marrow. The tumor suppressor gene TP53 plays a crucial role in maintaining genomic integrity and preventing the development of cancer. TP53 mutations are frequently observed in AML (∼10% of patients) and are associated with aggressive disease behavior, resistance to therapy, and poor prognosis., Summary: Recent changes in classification of TP53-mutated myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) have occurred related to the allelic status of TP53 and more importantly to harmonize MDS/AML patients as a homogeneous hematological malignancy. Current treatment regimens involve hypomethylating agents +/- venetoclax or intensive chemotherapy although unfortunately independent of treatment regimen the overall survival (OS) of this patient cohort is around 6 months with poor long-term outcomes after allogeneic stem-cell transplantation. Recent developments geared toward the treatment of TP53-mutated MDS/AML have focused on immunotherapies., Key Messages: Notably, there is optimism surrounding these new therapies that could provide breakthroughs with improving outcomes either as monotherapy or combined with established nonimmune therapies. This paper aims to provide an overview of TP53-mutated MDS/AML, including the underlying mechanisms, clinical implications, and emerging therapeutic strategies targeting this hematologic malignancy., (© 2023 S. Karger AG, Basel.)

Although remarkable international efforts have been ongoing for over 17 years to improve upon azacitidine, representing the standard of care therapy for higher-risk myelodysplastic neoplasms (MDS), there still has not been a positive randomized trial in comparison to azacitidine. Real-world data from numerous trials have shown similar results with a median overall survival of 14-18 months, a 40%-50% overall response rate, and a complete remission rate close to 20%. Despite these outcomes, 6 randomized controlled trials have failed to improve outcomes in this patient population, although relevant issues in some of these studies included improper dose adjustments of the hypomethylating agent, lack of placebo- controlled studies, and lack of overall survival (OS) as a primary endpoint, among others. Critical updates in MDS management include the development of molecular prognostication models (eg, the molecular international prognostic scoring system), updates in classification systems highlighting significant overlap in patients with MDS-increased blasts and acute myeloid leukemia (most relevant to TP53 mutations), and refinement of response criteria. Although these paradigm-shifting studies have had great impact in MDS management, the current ongoing randomized phase 3 trials were initiated prior, and prognostic stratification remains via the revised international prognostic scoring system) and with bone marrow blast counts of <20%. Notably, azacitidine + venetoclax, azacitidine + sabatolimab, and azacitidine + magrolimab have shown exciting results in large, single-arm studies and have completed accrual in placebo-controlled, double-blind studies with OS as a primary endpoint. We all eagerly await the results of these studies., (Copyright © 2023 by The American Society of Hematology.)

The guidelines for classification, prognostication, and response assessment of myelodysplastic syndromes/neoplasms (MDS) have all recently been updated. In this report on behalf of the International Consortium for MDS (icMDS) we summarize these developments. We first critically examine the updated World Health Organization (WHO) classification and the International Consensus Classification (ICC) of MDS. We then compare traditional and molecularly based risk MDS risk assessment tools. Lastly, we discuss limitations of criteria in measuring therapeutic benefit and highlight how the International Working Group (IWG) 2018 and 2023 response criteria addressed these deficiencies and are endorsed by the icMDS. We also address the importance of patient centered care by discussing the value of quality-of-life assessment. We hope that the reader of this review will have a better understanding of how to classify MDS, predict clinical outcomes and evaluate therapeutic outcomes., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest Maximilian Stahl consulted for Curis Oncology and Boston Consulting; served on the advisory board for Novartis and Kymera, GSK, Rigel, Sierra Oncology; and participated in GME activity for Novartis, Curis Oncology, Haymarket Media and Clinical care options (CCO). Elizabeth A. Griffiths has received honoraria for advisory board membership from AbbVie, Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Apellis, Celgene/BMS, CTI Biopharma, Genentech, Novartis, Picnic Health, Takeda Oncology, Taiho Oncology. EAG has received research funding from Astex Pharmaceuticals, AstraZeneca Rare Disease, Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Apellis Pharmaceuticals, Blueprint Medicines, Genentech Inc., and honoraria for CME activities from Physicians Educational Resource, MediComWorldwide, American Society of Hematology, AAMDS International Foundation. Ravindra Majeti is on the Advisory Boards of Kodikaz Therapeutic Solutions, Syros Pharmaceuticals, TenSixteen Bio, Roche, and Cullgen Inc. and is an inventor on several patents related to CD47 cancer immunotherapy licensed to Gilead Sciences. R.M. receives research support from Gilead Sciences. Ravindra Majeti. is a co-founder and equity holder of Pheast Therapeutics, MyeloGene, and Orbital Therapeutics. Stephanie Halene consulted for Forma Therapeutics. Daniel T. Starczynowski is a consultant and received research funding from Kymera Therapeutics, Kurome Therapeutics, Captor Therapeutics, and Tolero Therapeutics. Daniel T. Starczynowski has equity in Kurome Therapeutics. Gail Roboz: Consultancy: Abbvie, Amgen, Argenx, Astra Zeneca, Bluebird Bio, Blueprint Medicines, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Caribou Biosciences, Celgene, Daiichi Sankyo, Ellipses Pharma, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Jasper Pharmaceuticals, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Molecular Partners, Novartis, Pfizer, Rigel, Roche, Syndax, Takeda (IRC Chair), Telix Pharma Research support: Janssen. David A. Sallman served on the advisory board of Aprea, AvenCell, BlueBird Bio, BMS, Intellia, Kite, Novartis, Shattuck Labs, Servier, Syndax. David A. Sallman served as a consultant for AbbVie, Magenta, Molecular Partners AG, Takeda and on the speakers' bureau for BMS, Incyte, Servier; David A. Sallman received research funding from Aprea, Jazz. Mrinal Patnaik received research funding from Kura Oncology and StemLine Pharmaceuticals. Andrew Brunner received consulting or advisory board honoraria from Novartis, Acceleron, Agios, Abbvie, Takeda, Celgene/BMS, Keros Therapeutics, Taiho, Gilead. Andrew Brunner has research support from the NIH SPORE in Myeloid Malignancies, and from the Edward P. Evans Foundation. Tae Kon Kim received research funding from Nextcure and is a consultant for Agenus. Alan List is employed by and has equity in Precision BioSciences, and has served as a consultant for Halia Therapeutics, CTI Biopharma, Aileron. Naval Daver has received research funding from Daiichi-Sankyo, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Pfizer, Gilead, Sevier, Genentech, Astellas, Daiichi-Sankyo, Abbvie, Hanmi, Trovagene, FATE therapeutics, Amgen, Novimmune, Glycomimetics, Trillium, and ImmunoGen and has served in a consulting or advisory role for Daiichi-Sankyo, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Arog, Pfizer, Novartis, Jazz, Celgene, AbbVie, Astellas, Genentech, Immunogen, Servier, Syndax, Trillium, Gilead, Amgen, Shattuck labs, and Agios. Guillermo Sanz received honoraria, advisory board membership or consultation fees from AbbVie, BMS, ExCellThera, Novartis, Roche, and Takeda and participated in sponsored speaker's bureau for BMS, Novartis, and Takeda. Mikkael A. Sekeres has served on advisory boards for BMS, Novartis, Kurome, and Gilead. Pierre Fenaux received research funding from BMS, Abbvie, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Novartis, and Janssen. Pierre Fenaux had a consultancy with and received honoraria from BMS, Abbvie, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, and Novartis. Fabio Efficace had a consultancy or advisory role for AbbVie, Incyte, Janssen, and Syros, outside the submitted work. Omar Abdel-Wahab has served as a consultant for H3B Biomedicine, Foundation Medicine Inc., Merck, Prelude Therapeutics, and Janssen, and is on the Scientific Advisory Board of Envisagenics Inc., AIChemy, Harmonic Discovery Inc., and Pfizer Boulder; Omar Abdel-Wahab has received prior research funding from H3B Biomedicine and LOXO Oncology unrelated to the current manuscript. Andrew H.Wei has served on advisory boards for Novartis, Astra Zeneca, Astellas, Janssen, Jazz, Amgen, Roche, Pfizer, Abbvie, Servier, Gilead, BMS, Shoreline, Macrogenics, Novartis and Agios; receives research funding to the Institution from Novartis, Abbvie, Servier, Janssen, BMS, Syndax, Astex, Astra Zeneca, Amgen; serves on speaker's bureaus for Abbvie, Novartis, BMS, Servier, Astellas; Andrew H.Wei is an employee of the Walter and Eliza Hall Institute (WEHI). WEHI receives milestone and royalty payments related to the development of Venetoclax. Current and past employees of Walter and Eliza Hall Institute may be eligible for financial benefits related to these payments. Andrew H. Wei receives such a financial benefit. Amer M. Zeidan received research funding (institutional) from Celgene/BMS, Abbvie, Astex, Pfizer, Medimmune/AstraZeneca, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Cardiff oncology, Incyte, Takeda, Novartis, Aprea, and ADC Therapeutics. AMZ participated in advisory boards, and/or had a consultancy with and received honoraria from AbbVie, Otsuka, Pfizer, Celgene/BMS, Jazz, Incyte, Agios, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Novartis, Acceleron, Astellas, Daiichi Sankyo, Cardinal Health, Taiho, Seattle Genetics, BeyondSpring, Cardiff Oncology, Takeda, Ionis, Amgen, Janssen, Epizyme, Syndax, Gilead, Kura, Chiesi, ALX Oncology, BioCryst, Notable, Orum, and Tyme. AMZ served on clinical trial committees for Novartis, Abbvie, Gilead, BioCryst, Abbvie, ALX Oncology, Geron and Celgene/BMS. The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute receives research funding for the laboratory of Dr. Hourigan from Sellas and from the Foundation of the NIH AML MRD Biomarkers Consortium. All other authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Magrolimab is a first-in-class humanized monoclonal antibody against cluster of differentiation 47, an antiphagocytic signal used by cancer cells to evade phagocytosis. Azacitidine upregulates prophagocytic signals on AML cells, further increasing phagocytosis when combined with magrolimab. We report final phase Ib data for magrolimab with azacitidine in patients with untreated AML ineligible for intensive chemotherapy (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03248479)., Patients and Methods: Patients with previously untreated AML, including TP53 -mutant AML, received magrolimab intravenously as an initial dose (1 mg/kg, days 1 and 4), followed by 15 mg/kg once on day 8 and 30 mg/kg once weekly or every 2 weeks as maintenance. Azacitidine 75 mg/m 2 was administered intravenously/subcutaneously once daily on days 1-7 of each 28-day cycle. Primary end points were safety/tolerability and proportion with complete remission (CR)., Results: Eighty-seven patients were enrolled and treated; 72 (82.8%) had TP53 mutations with a median variant allele frequency of 61% (range, 9.8-98.7). Fifty-seven (79.2%) of TP53 -mutant patients had European LeukemiaNet 2017 adverse-risk cytogenetics. Patients received a median of 4 (range, 1-39) cycles of treatment. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events included constipation (49.4%), nausea (49.4%), and diarrhea (48.3%). Thirty (34.5%) experienced anemia, and the median hemoglobin change from baseline to first postdose assessment was -0.9 g/dL (range, -3.6 to 2.5 g/dL). Twenty-eight (32.2%) patients achieved CR, including 23 (31.9%) patients with TP53 mutations. The median overall survival in TP53- mutant and wild-type patients were 9.8 months and 18.9 months, respectively., Conclusion: Magrolimab with azacitidine was relatively well tolerated with promising efficacy in patients with AML ineligible for intensive induction chemotherapy, including those with TP53 mutations, warranting further evaluation of magrolimab with azacitidine in AML. The phase III randomized ENHANCE-2 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04778397) and ENHANCE-3 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05079230) studies are recruiting frontline patients with AML.

Background: Patient-reported data can improve quality of healthcare delivery and patient outcomes. Moffitt Cancer Center ("Moffitt") administers the Electronic Patient Questionnaire (EPQ) to collect data on demographics, including sexual orientation and gender identity (SOGI), medical history, cancer risk factors, and quality of life. Here we investigated differences in EPQ completion by demographic and cancer characteristics., Methods: An analysis including 146,142 new adult patients at Moffitt in 2009-2020 was conducted using scheduling, EPQ and cancer registry data. EPQ completion was described by calendar year and demographics. Logistic regression was used to estimate associations between demographic/cancer characteristics and EPQ completion. More recently collected information on SOGI were described., Results: Patient portal usage (81%) and EPQ completion rates (79%) were consistently high since 2014. Among patients in the cancer registry, females were more likely to complete the EPQ than males (odds ratio [OR] = 1.17, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.14-1.20). Patients ages 18-64 years were more likely to complete the EPQ than patients aged ≥65. Lower EPQ completion rates were observed among Black or African American patients (OR = 0.59, 95% CI = 0.56-0.63) as compared to Whites and among patients whose preferred language was Spanish (OR = 0.40, 95% CI = 0.36-0.44) or another language as compared to English. Furthermore, patients with localized (OR = 1.16, 95% CI = 1.12-1.19) or regional (OR = 1.16, 95% CI = 1.12-1.20) cancer were more likely to complete the EPQ compared to those with metastatic disease. Less than 3% of patients self-identified as being lesbian, gay, or bisexual and <0.1% self-identified as transgender, genderqueer, or other., Conclusions: EPQ completion rates differed across demographics highlighting opportunities for targeted process improvement. Healthcare organizations should evaluate data acquisition methods to identify potential disparities in data completeness that can impact quality of clinical care and generalizability of self-reported data., (© 2023 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Purpose: Preclinical studies in myeloid neoplasms have demonstrated efficacy of bromodomain and extra-terminal protein inhibitors (BETi). However, BETi demonstrates poor single-agent activity in clinical trials. Several studies suggest that combination with other anticancer inhibitors may enhance the efficacy of BETi., Experimental Design: To nominate BETi combination therapies for myeloid neoplasms, we used a chemical screen with therapies currently in clinical cancer development and validated this screen using a panel of myeloid cell line, heterotopic cell line models, and patient-derived xenograft models of disease. We used standard protein and RNA assays to determine the mechanism responsible for synergy in our disease models., Results: We identified PIM inhibitors (PIMi) as therapeutically synergistic with BETi in myeloid leukemia models. Mechanistically, we show that PIM kinase is increased after BETi treatment, and that PIM kinase upregulation is sufficient to induce persistence to BETi and sensitize cells to PIMi. Furthermore, we demonstrate that miR-33a downregulation is the underlying mechanism driving PIM1 upregulation. We also show that GM-CSF hypersensitivity, a hallmark of chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML), represents a molecular signature for sensitivity to combination therapy., Conclusions: Inhibition of PIM kinases is a potential novel strategy for overcoming BETi persistence in myeloid neoplasms. Our data support further clinical investigation of this combination., (©2023 American Association for Cancer Research.)

Biological events that contribute to the pathogenesis of myelodysplastic syndromes/neoplasms (MDS) are becoming increasingly characterized and are being translated into rationally designed therapeutic strategies. Herein, we provide updates from the first International Workshop on MDS (iwMDS) of the International Consortium for MDS (icMDS) detailing recent advances in understanding the genetic landscape of MDS, including germline predisposition, epigenetic and immune dysregulation, the complexities of clonal hematopoiesis progression to MDS, as well as novel animal models of the disease. Connected to this progress is the development of novel therapies targeting specific molecular alterations, the innate immune system, and immune checkpoint inhibitors. While some of these agents have entered clinical trials (e.g., splicing modulators, IRAK1/4 inhibitors, anti-CD47 and anti-TIM3 antibodies, and cellular therapies), none have been approved for MDS. Additional preclinical and clinical work is needed to develop a truly individualized approach to the care of MDS patients., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest Maximilian Stahl consulted for Curis Oncology and Boston Consulting; served on the advisory board for Novartis and Kymera; and participated in GME activity for Novartis, Curis Oncology, Haymarket Media and Clinical care options (CCO). Elizabeth A. Griffiths has received honoraria for advisory board membership from AbbVie, Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Apellis, Celgene/BMS, CTI Biopharma, Genentech, Novartis, Picnic Health, Takeda Oncology, Taiho Oncology. EAG has received research funding from Astex Pharmaceuticals, AstraZeneca Rare Disease, Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Apellis Pharmaceuticals, Blueprint Medicines, Genentech Inc., and honoraria for CME activities from Physicians Educational Resource, MediComWorldwide, American Society of Hematology, AAMDS International Foundation. Ravindra Majeti is on the Advisory Boards of Kodikaz Therapeutic Solutions, Syros Pharmaceuticals, TenSixteen Bio, Roche, and Cullgen Inc. and is an inventor on a number of patents related to CD47 cancer immunotherapy licensed to Gilead Sciences. R.M. receives research support from Gilead Sciences. Ravindra Majeti. is a co-founder and equity holder of Pheast Therapeutics, MyeloGene, and Orbital Therapeutics. Stephanie Halene consulted for Forma Therapeutics. Daniel T. Starczynowski is a consultant and received research funding from Kymera Therapeutics, Kurome Therapeutics, Captor Therapeutics, and Tolero Therapeutics. Daniel T. Starczynowski has equity in Kurome Therapeutics. David A. Sallman served on the advisory board of Aprea, AvenCell, BlueBird Bio, BMS, Intellia, Kite, Novartis, Shattuck Labs, Servier, Syndax. David A. Sallman served as a consultant for AbbVie, Magenta, Molecular Partners AG, Takeda and on the speakers' bureau for BMS, Incyte, Servier; David A. Sallman received research funding from Aprea, Jazz. Mrinal Patnaik received research funding from Kura Oncology and StemLine Pharmaceuticals. Andrew Brunner received consulting or advisory board honoraria from Novartis, Acceleron, Agios, Abbvie, Takeda, Celgene/BMS, Keros Therapeutics, Taiho, Gilead. Andrew Brunner has research support from the NIH SPORE in Myeloid Malignancies, and from the Edward P. Evans Foundation. Tae Kon Kim received research funding from Nextcure and is a consultant for Agenus. Alan List is employed by and has equity in Precision BioSciences, and has served as a consultant for Halia Therapeutics, CTI Biopharma, Aileron. Naval Daver has received research funding from Daiichi-Sankyo, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Pfizer, Gilead, Sevier, Genentech, Astellas, Daiichi-Sankyo, Abbvie, Hanmi, Trovagene, FATE therapeutics, Amgen, Novimmune, Glycomimetics, Trillium, and ImmunoGen and has served in a consulting or advisory role for Daiichi-Sankyo, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Arog, Pfizer, Novartis, Jazz, Celgene, AbbVie, Astellas, Genentech, Immunogen, Servier, Syndax, Trillium, Gilead, Amgen, Shattuck labs, and Agios. Guillermo Sanz received honoraria, advisory board membership or consultation fees from AbbVie, BMS, ExCellThera, Novartis, Roche, and Takeda and participated in sponsored speaker's bureau for BMS, Novartis, and Takeda. Mikkael A. Sekeres has served on advisory boards for BMS, Novartis, Kurome, and Gilead. Pierre Fenaux received research funding from BMS, Abbvie, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Novartis, and Janssen. Pierre Fenaux had a consultancy with and received honoraria from BMS, Abbvie, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, and Novartis. Omar Abdel-Wahab has served as a consultant for H3B Biomedicine, Foundation Medicine Inc., Merck, Prelude Therapeutics, and Janssen, and is on the Scientific Advisory Board of Envisagenics Inc., AIChemy, Harmonic Discovery Inc., and Pfizer Boulder; Omar Abdel-Wahab has received prior research funding from H3B Biomedicine and LOXO Oncology unrelated to the current manuscript. Andrew H.Wei has served on advisory boards for Novartis, Astra Zeneca, Astellas, Janssen, Jazz, Amgen, Roche, Pfizer, Abbvie, Servier, Gilead, BMS, Shoreline, Macrogenics, Novartis and Agios; receives research funding to the Institution from Novartis, Abbvie, Servier, Janssen, BMS, Syndax, Astex, Astra Zeneca, Amgen; serves on speaker's bureaus for Abbvie, Novartis, BMS, Servier, Astellas; Andrew H.Wei is an employee of the Walter and Eliza Hall Institute (WEHI). WEHI receives milestone and royalty payments related to the development of Venetoclax. Current and past employees of Walter and Eliza Hall Institute may be eligible for financial benefits related to these payments. Andrew H.Wei receives such a financial benefit. Valeria Santini served in advisory boards from Abbvie, BMS, Geron, Gilead,Menarini, Novartis, Servier, Syros, ad received research support from BMS. Amer M. Zeidan received research funding (institutional) from Celgene/BMS, Abbvie, Astex, Pfizer, Medimmune/AstraZeneca, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Cardiff oncology, Incyte, Takeda, Novartis, Aprea, and ADC Therapeutics. AMZ participated in advisory boards, and/or had a consultancy with and received honoraria from AbbVie, Otsuka, Pfizer, Celgene/BMS, Jazz, Incyte, Agios, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Novartis, Acceleron, Astellas, Daiichi Sankyo, Cardinal Health, Taiho, Seattle Genetics, BeyondSpring, Cardiff Oncology, Takeda, Ionis, Amgen, Janssen, Epizyme, Syndax, Gilead, Kura, Chiesi, ALX Oncology, BioCryst, Notable, Orum, and Tyme. AMZ served on clinical trial committees for Novartis, Abbvie, Gilead, BioCryst, Abbvie, ALX Oncology, Geron and Celgene/BMS. The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute receives research funding for the laboratory of Dr. Hourigan from Sellas and from the Foundation of the NIH AML MRD Biomarkers Consortium. All other authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

The Molecular International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS-M) is a novel risk stratification model for myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) that builds on the IPSS and IPSS-R by incorporating mutational data. The model showed improved prognostic accuracy over the IPSS-R across three endpoints: overall survival (OS), leukemia-free survival (LFS) and leukemic transformation. This study aimed to validate the findings of the original in a large cohort of MDS patients, as well as assess its validity in therapy-related and hypoplastic MDS. We retrospectively reviewed clinical, cytogenetic and molecular data for 2355 MDS patients treated at the Moffitt Cancer Center. Correlative analysis between IPSS-R and mean IPSS-M scores and outcome predictions was performed on LFS, OS and leukemic transformation. Using the IPSS-M, patients were classified as Very Low (4%), Low (24%), Moderate-Low (14%), Moderate-High (11%), High (19%) and Very-High risk (28%). Median OS was 11.7, 7.1, 4.4, 3.1, 2.3, and 1.3 years from VL to VH risk subgroups. Median LFS was 12.3, 6.9, 3.6, 2.2, 1.4, and 0.5 years respectively. For patients with t-MDS and h-MDS the model retained its prognostic accuracy. Generalized use of this tool will likely result in more accurate prognostic assessment and optimize therapeutic decision-making in MDS., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.)

Purpose: Magrolimab is a monoclonal antibody that blocks cluster of differentiation 47, a don't-eat-me signal overexpressed on cancer cells. Cluster of differentiation 47 blockade by magrolimab promotes macrophage-mediated phagocytosis of tumor cells and is synergistic with azacitidine, which increases expression of eat-me signals. We report final phase Ib data in patients with untreated higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) treated with magrolimab and azacitidine (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03248479)., Patients and Methods: Patients with previously untreated Revised International Prognostic Scoring System intermediate-/high-/very high-risk MDS received magrolimab intravenously as a priming dose (1 mg/kg) followed by ramp-up to a 30 mg/kg once-weekly or once-every-2-week maintenance dose. Azacitidine 75 mg/m 2 was administered intravenously/subcutaneously once daily on days 1-7 of each 28-day cycle. Primary end points were safety/tolerability and complete remission (CR) rate., Results: Ninety-five patients were treated. Revised International Prognostic Scoring System risk was intermediate/high/very high in 27%, 52%, and 21%, respectively. Fifty-nine (62%) had poor-risk cytogenetics and 25 (26%) had TP53 mutation. The most common treatment-emergent adverse effects included constipation (68%), thrombocytopenia (55%), and anemia (52%). Median hemoglobin change from baseline to first postdose assessment was -0.7 g/dL (range, -3.1 to +2.4). CR rate and overall response rate were 33% and 75%, respectively. Median time to response, duration of CR, duration of overall response, and progression-free survival were 1.9, 11.1, 9.8, and 11.6 months, respectively. Median overall survival (OS) was not reached with 17.1-month follow-up. In TP53 -mutant patients, 40% achieved CR with median OS of 16.3 months. Thirty-four patients (36%) had allogeneic stem-cell transplant with 77% 2-year OS., Conclusion: Magrolimab + azacitidine was well tolerated with promising efficacy in patients with untreated higher-risk MDS, including those with TP53 mutations. A phase III trial of magrolimab/placebo + azacitidine is ongoing (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04313881 [ENHANCE]).

Introduction/Background The impact of biological sex on the clinical phenotype, genotype, and outcomes among patients with MDS is not well characterized. Materials and Methods We retrospectively reviewed the clinical and genomic data from male and female patients included in our institutional MDS database at Moffitt Cancer Center. Results Among 4580 patients with MDS, 2922 (66%) were men and 1658 (34%) were women. Women were younger (mean age 66.5 vs. 69 years for men, P < .001) at diagnosis. There were more Hispanic/black women than men (9% vs. 5%, P =<.001). Women had lower hemoglobin and higher platelet counts than men. More women had del 5q/monosomy 5 abnormalities compared to men (P =<.001). Therapy related MDS were more common in women than men (25% vs.17%, P=<.001). On assessment of molecular profile, SRSF2, U2AF1, ASXL1, and RUNX1 mutations were more frequent in men. The median overall survival (mOS) was 37.5 months (mo) for females compared to 35 monthsfor males, (P = .002). The mOS was significantly prolonged for women in lower-risk MDS, but not in higher-risk MDS. Women were more likely to respond to immunosuppression with ATG/CSA than men (38% vs. 19%, P= 0.04).Conclusion Ongoing research is needed for understanding the impact of sex on phenotype, genotype, and outcomes in patients diagnosed with MDS., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Abstract: Risk stratification plays an essential role in treatment planning in myelodysplastic syndromes. For decades, the International Prognostic Scoring System and its revised version have provided unified consensus for clinical trial enrollment and design. These models relied on laboratory and cytogenetic data to estimate prognosis and dictate treatment paradigms. Critical developments in DNA sequencing techniques in recent years, as well as our growing understanding of the clonal dynamics of myelodysplastic syndromes and the role that specific mutations have in shaping disease-specific phenotypes and treatment susceptibilities, have made it possible to identify molecular markers that carry critical diagnostic and therapeutic relevance and remained unaccounted for in the older models. The Molecular International Prognostic Scoring System is a novel risk stratification model that integrates clinical, cytogenetic, and molecular data to devise a more refined prognostic tool that builds on the accuracy of the traditional models., Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest and Source of Funding: The authors have disclosed that they have no significant relationships with, or financial interest in, any commercial companies pertaining to this article., (Copyright © 2023 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Opinion Statement: Lower risk myelodysplastic syndromes are typically characterized by an indolent disease course with a relatively low risk of transformation into acute myeloid leukemia. These patients are classically identified using the revised International Prognostic Scoring System and most likely its molecular version in the near future which may change the paradigm of treatment. The overall goals of care are symptomatic control to reduce transfusion requirements and improve quality of life. Symptomatic anemia is the most common indication to initiate disease-specific therapies after the optimization of supportive measures. Currently, erythropoiesis-stimulating agents remain the standard upfront therapy for anemia, and patients with del(5q) cytogenetic changes can benefit from lenalidomide monotherapy. Other therapeutic options after failure of upfront treatment include luspatercept, hypomethylating agents, and immunosuppressive therapies after taking into account of individualized disease features. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant is the only potentially curative option and is usually reserved for medically fit patients with severe symptomatic cytopenias who failed all standard options and/or the disease is progressing toward higher risk categories. Fortunately, novel investigational therapies are rapidly emerging by targeting different biological processes contributing to MDS pathogenesis, and eligible patients should be managed in clinical trials if available., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Background: TP53-mutated acute myeloid leukaemia is associated with poor outcomes. Eprenetapopt (APR-246) is a first-in-class, small-molecule p53 reactivator. We aimed to evaluate the combination of eprenetapopt and venetoclax with or without azacitidine in patients with TP53-mutated acute myeloid leukaemia., Methods: This phase 1, multicentre, open-label, dose-finding and cohort expansion study was done at eight academic research hospitals in the USA. Inclusion criteria were age of at least 18 years; at least one pathogenic TP53 mutation; treatment-naive acute myeloid leukaemia according to the 2016 WHO classification; an ECOG performance status of 0-2; and a life expectancy of at least 12 weeks. In dose-finding cohort 1 patients received previous therapy with hypomethylating agents for myelodysplastic syndromes. In dose-finding cohort 2, previous use of hypomethylating agents was not permitted. Treatment cycles were 28 days. Patients in cohort 1 received intravenous eprenetapopt 4·5 g/day on days 1-4 and oral venetoclax 400 mg/day on days 1-28; those in cohort 2 also received subcutaneous or intravenous azacitidine 75 mg/m 2 on days 1-7. The expansion part of the study proceeded with patients enrolled as in cohort 2. Primary endpoints were safety in all cohorts (assessed in patients receiving at least one dose of assigned treatment) and complete response in the expansion cohort (assessed in patients who completed at least one treatment cycle and had at least one post-treatment clinical response assessment). The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04214860, and is complete., Findings: Between Jan 3, 2020, and July 22, 2021, 49 patients were enrolled across all cohorts. Six patients were initially enrolled into each of dose-finding cohorts 1 and 2; after no dose-limiting toxicities were observed, cohort 2 was expanded to enrol an additional 37 patients. The median age was 67 years (IQR 59-73). 24 (49%) of 49 patients were female and 25 (51%) male, and 40 (82%) were White. At data cutoff (Oct 1, 2021), the median length of follow-up was 9·5 months (IQR 6·1-11·5). No dose-limiting toxicities were recorded and the recommended phase 2 dose for eprenetapopt combinations was 4·5 g/day on days 1-4. Across all patients, adverse events of grade 3 or worse occurring in at least 20% of patients were febrile neutropenia (23 [47%] of 49 patients), thrombocytopenia (18 [37%] patients), leukopenia (12 [25%] patients), and anaemia (11 [22%] patients). Treatment-related serious adverse events occurred in 13 (27%) of 49 patients and there was one (2%) treatment-related death (sepsis). 25 (64%, 95% CI 47-79) of 39 patients had an overall response with eprenetapopt and venetoclax with azacytidine; 15 (38%, 23-55) had a complete response., Interpretation: Eprenetapopt and venetoclax with azacitidine had an acceptable safety profile and encouraging activity, supporting further frontline evaluation of this combination in the treatment of TP53-mutated acute myeloid leukaemia., Funding: Aprea Therapeutics., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests GG-M reports research funding from Aprea Therapeutics. ADG reports research funding from Aprea Therapeutics; consulting fees from AbbVie, Aptose Biosciences, Astellas Pharma, Daiichi Sankyo, and Genentech; honoraria from AbbVie and Dava Oncology; and advisory board membership for AbbVie. ESW reports consulting fees from Pfizer, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, and Takeda. JKA reports research funding from Astellas Pharma and OPEN Health Group. ATF reports grants from Agios Pharmaceuticals/Servier, Celgene/Bristol-Myers Squibb (BMS), and AbbVie; and consulting fees from Pfizer, Trillium Health Partners, AbbVie, Kura Oncology, Blueprint Medicines, Genentech, Novartis, Trovagene, Agios Pharmaceuticals/Servier, Celgene/BMS, MorphoSys, Kite Pharma, Foghorn Therapeutics, Takeda, Amgen, Seattle Genetics, NewLink Genetics, Forty Seven, Ipsen, ImmunoGen, Mablytics, PureTech Health, Forma Therapeutics, Daiichi Sankyo, EnClear Therapies, and Astellas Pharma. OO reports research funding from Aprea Therapeutics; grants from AbbVie, Agios Pharmaceuticals, Astex, AstraZeneca, BMS, Celgene, CTI BioPharma, Daiichi Sankyo, Incyte, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Kartos Therapeutics, Loxo Oncology, Novartis, NS Pharma, and Oncotherapy Sciences; advisory board membership for BMS, Celgene, Novartis, Taiho Pharmaceutical, and Kymera Therapeutics; membership of a data safety monitoring board for Threadwell Therapeutics; and leadership as Vice Chair of the medical advisory board of the Aplastic Anemia and MDS International Foundation. Kxs consulting fees from Astellas Pharma, BMS, Gilead Sciences, and Novartis and advisory board membership for BerGenBio, Curis, and Mablytics. GJR reports research funding from Aprea Therapeutics; grants from Janssen Pharmaceuticals; and consulting fees from Actinium Pharmaceuticals, Agios Pharmaceuticals, Amgen, Astellas Pharma, AstraZeneca, BMS, Blueprint Medicines, bluebird bio, Catamaran Bio, Celgene, Daiichi Sankyo, GlaxoSmithKline, Helsinn, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Jasper Therapeutics, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Mesoblast, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Syndax Pharmaceuticals, Takeda, and Trovagene. JL reports consulting fees from AbbVie, Agios Pharmaceuticals, Astellas Pharma, BerGenBio, Boxer Capital, Celgene, Daiichi Sankyo, The Dedham Group, ElevateBio, Jasper Therapeutics, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Millenium Pharmaceuticals, Novartis, and Servier. DKH, AW, and ECA report employment with Aprea Therapeutics. HK reports grants from AbbVie, Amgen, Ascentage Pharma, BMS, Daiichi Sankyo, ImmunoGen, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, and Novartis and honoraria from AbbVie, Amgen, Amphista Therapeutics, Ascentage Pharma, Astellas Pharma, Biologix Pharma, Curis, Ipsen Biopharmaceuticals, KAHR Medical, Labcorp, Novartis, Pfizer, Shenzhen TargetRx, Stemline Therapeutics, and Takeda. DAS reports research funding from Aprea Therapeutics and Jazz Pharmaceuticals; consulting fees from AbbVie, Takeda, Zentalis Pharmaceuticals, and Molecular Partners; speakers bureaus from BMS and Incyte; and advisory board membership for AvenCell, Jasper Therapeutics, bluebird bio, BMS, Shattuck Labs, Intellia Therapeutics, Novartis, Gilead Sciences, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Curis, Syndax Pharmaceuticals, Agios Pharmaceuticals, and Servier. All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Background: CYAD-01 is an autologous chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell product based on the natural killer (NK) group 2D (NKG2D) receptor, which binds eight ligands that are overexpressed in a wide range of haematological malignancies but are largely absent on non-neoplastic cells. Initial clinical evaluation of a single infusion of CYAD-01 at a low dose in patients with relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukaemia, myelodysplastic syndromes, and multiple myeloma supported the feasibility of the approach and prompted further evaluation of CYAD-01. The aim of the present study was to determine the safety and recommended phase 2 dosing of CYAD-01 administered without preconditioning or bridging chemotherapy., Methods: The multicentre THINK study was an open-label, dose-escalation, phase 1 study for patients with relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukaemia, myelodysplastic syndromes, or multiple myeloma, after at least one previous line of therapy. Patients were recruited from five hospitals in the USA and Belgium. The dose-escalation segment evaluated three dose levels: 3 × 10 8 (dose level one), 1 × 10 9 (dose level two), and 3 × 10 9 (dose level three) cells per infusion with a 3 + 3 Fibonacci study design using a schedule of three infusions at 2-week intervals followed by potential consolidation treatment consisting of three additional infusions. The occurrence of dose-limiting toxicities post-CYAD-01 infusion was assessed as the primary endpoint in the total treated patient population. The trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03018405, and EudraCT, 2016-003312-12, and has been completed., Findings: Between Feb 6, 2017, and Oct 9, 2018, 25 patients were registered in the haematological dose-escalation segment. Seven patients had manufacturing failure for insufficient yield and two had screening failure. 16 patients were treated with CYAD-01 (three with multiple myeloma and three with acute myeloid leukaemia at dose level one; three with acute myeloid leukaemia at dose level two; and six with acute myeloid leukaemia and one with myelodysplastic syndromes at dose level three). Median follow-up was 118 days (IQR 46-180). Seven patients (44%) had grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events. In total, five patients (31%) had grade 3 or 4 cytokine release syndrome across all dose levels. One dose-limiting toxicity of cytokine release syndrome was reported at dose level three. No treatment-related deaths occurred, and the maximum tolerated dose was not reached. Three (25%) of 12 evaluable patients with relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukaemia or myelodysplastic syndromes had an objective response. Among responders, two patients with acute myeloid leukaemia proceeded to allogeneic haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT) after CYAD-01 treatment, with durable ongoing remissions (5 and 61 months)., Interpretation: Treatment with a multiple CYAD-01 infusion schedule without preconditioning is well tolerated and shows anti-leukaemic activity, although without durability outside of patients bridged to allogeneic HSCT. These phase 1 data support the proof-of-concept of targeting NKG2D ligands by CAR T-cell therapy. Further clinical studies with NKG2D-based CAR T-cells are warranted, potentially via combinatorial antigen targeted approaches, to improve anti-tumour activity., Funding: Celyad Oncology., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests DAS has received payment as a member of advisory boards for Aprea, AvenCell, BlueBird Bio, Bristol Myers Squibb (BMS), Intellia, Kite, Novartis, Shattuck Labs, Servier, and Syndax; as a consultant for AbbVie, Magenta, Molecular Partners, and Takeda; as a member of a speakers bureau for BMS, Incyte, and Servier; and for research funding from Aprea and Jazz. VH has received payment as speaker with honoraria from Novartis, support for attending meetings from Novartis and Abbvie, and as member of data safety monitoring board with Incyte and Novartis. ESW has received consulting fees from Abbvie, AmGen, Astellas, BMS, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Jazz, Kite, Mana, Novartis, NuProbe, Pfizer, PharmaEssentia, and Takeda; and payment as member of data safety monitoring board or speaker bureau from Abbvie, Astellas, CTI Biopharma, Dava oncology, Gilead, Novartis, Kite, Pfizer, Rafael, and Stemline. MLD has received licensing fees from Atara and CRISPR; research funds from Atara, CRISPR, Kite, and Novartis; and consulting fees from Synthekine, Adicet, and Bellicum. J-PM has received payment as an advisory board member or speaker with honoraria from Pfizer, Roche, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Innate, Merck Serono, Boerhinger, BMS, Novartis, Janssen, Incyte, Cue Biopharma, ALX Oncology, iTEOS, eTheRNA, NEKTAR, and F-Star; and as member of a data safety monitoring board with honoraria for Psioxus. AA took part in advisory boards from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Daiichi, EISAI, Genomic Health, Hengrui, Innate, Ipsen, Leo Pharma, Lilly, Merck, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, and Seattle Genetics; received speaker fees from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Daiichi, EISAI, Genomic Health, Ipsen, Leo Pharma, Lilly, Merck, Merck Sharpe and Dohme, Novartis, Pfizer, and Seattle Genetics; and research grants from BMS, Roche. EMA-O, RB, NB, M-SD, DEG, CL, FFL and AF are or were employed by Celyad Oncology. RB, NB, M-SD, DEG, CL, FFL, and AF are or were employed by Celyad Oncology. All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

The heterogeneous nature of myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) demands a risk-adapted therapeutic approach, and higher risk MDS, characterized by an increased risk of transformation into acute myeloid leukemia and inferior survival, is typically defined based on an integrated assessment of cytopenias, bone marrow blast percentage, and cytogenetic findings using the revised International Prognostic Scoring System. Incorporating mutational data could further refine the risk assessment and identify those with higher-than-expected disease risk. The principal therapeutic goal in this disease subset is to modify the natural history and prolong survival. Allogeneic stem cell transplant, the only potentially curative treatment, should be offered to eligible patients. Hypomethylating agents are the only approved treatment with unsatisfactory response rates and duration, and patients who failed prior hypomethylating agents unfortunately have dismal outcomes with urgent need of novel therapeutic agents. In this review, we provide the therapeutic landscape in higher risk MDS based on the current evidence and discuss the investigational treatment options under development.

Background: The global incidence of myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) has been estimated as 0.06 to 0.26/100,000. Since their introduction, hypomethylating agents have played a central role in the treatment of MDS, with heterogeneous real-world outcomes., Materials and Methods: We assessed and synthesized clinical outcomes of azacitidine (AZA) monotherapy in treatment-naïve patients with higher-risk MDS. A systematic literature review was conducted by searching MEDLINE, Embase, and CENTRAL to identify randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and observational studies, both prospective and retrospective, reporting complete remission (CR), partial remission (PR), overall survival (OS), duration of response (DOR), time-to-response (TTR), and myelosuppressive adverse events (AEs) for patients treated with AZA monotherapy. Noncomparative meta-analyses were used to summarize effects., Results: The search identified 3250 abstracts, of which 34 publications describing 16 studies (5 RCTs, 3 prospective, and 8 retrospective observational) were included. Across all studies, pooled CR was 16%; PR was 6%; Median OS was 16.4 months; median DOR was 10.1 months; median TTR was 4.6 months. Proportions of grade 3/4 anemia and thrombocytopenia AEs were 10% and 30%., Conclusions: The effectiveness and efficacy of AZA monotherapy-as measured by CR and median OS-was limited. These findings highlight a significant unmet medical need for effective treatments for patients with higher-risk MDS., (Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

TP53-altered myelodysplastic syndrome with excess blasts and TP53-altered acute myeloid leukemia should be considered under one unifying classification term for their study in clinical trials. Ultimately, such a unification would simplify the screening processes for clinical trials and allow a focus on treating the patient for a genetically defined disorder rather than one based on an arbitrary blast threshold., (© 2022 American Cancer Society.)

EZH2 mutations in myeloid neoplasms are loss of function type, and have been linked to poor overall survival (OS) in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). However, the specific determinants of outcomes in EZH2-mutant (mut) MDS are not well characterized. In this single-center retrospective study, clinical and genomic data were collected on 1774 patients with MDS treated at Moffitt Cancer Center. In our cohort, 83 (4.7%) patients had a pathogenic EZH2 mutation. Patients with EZH2mut MDS were older than EZH2-wild type (wt) group (median age- 72 vs. 69 years, p = 0.010). The most common co-occurring mutation in EZH2mut MDS was ASXL1, with a significantly higher frequency than EZH2wt (54% vs. 19%, p < 0.001). Patients with EZH2mut MDS had lower response rates to hypomethylating agents compared to EZH2wt MDS (26% vs. 39%; p = 0.050). Median OS of patients with EZH2mut MDS was 30.8 months, with a significantly worse OS than EZH2wt group (35.5 vs. 61.2 months, p = 0.003) in the lower-risk IPSS-R categories. Among patients with EZH2mut MDS, co-presence of ASXL1 or RUNX1 mutations was associated with inferior median OS compared to their wt counterparts (26.8 vs. 48.7 months, p = 0.031). Concurrent chromosome 7 abnormalities (12%) were also associated with significantly worse OS (median OS- 20.8 vs. 35.5 months, p = 0.002) in EZH2mut MDS. Future clinical trials should explore the potential role of novel targeted therapies in improving outcomes in patients with EZH2mut MDS., Competing Interests: Conflict of Interest: Hussaini Consultancy/Advisory Board/Speaking for Adaptive Biotechnologies, Amgen, Aptitude Health, Bluprint Oncology, Celgene, Decibio, Diaceutics, Guidepoint, Seattle Genetics, Stemline, Tegus, Janssen. Tinsley-Vance: Jazz: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Taiho: Consultancy; Abbvie: Honoraria; Astellas: Speakers Bureau; Celgene/BMS: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Incyte: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy; Fresenius Kabi: Consultancy. Kuykendall: BluePrint Medicines: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene/BMS: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; CTI Biopharma: Honoraria; Incyte: Consultancy; Novartis: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; PharmaEssentia: Honoraria; Prelude: Research Funding; Abbvie: Honoraria; Protagonist: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Sweet: Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astellas: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AROG: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol Meyers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Lancet: AbbVie: Consultancy; Millennium Pharma/Takeda: Consultancy; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy; BerGenBio: Consultancy; ElevateBio Management: Consultancy; Astellas: Consultancy; Agios: Consultancy; Celgene/BMS: Consultancy; Jazz: Consultancy. Sallman: Takeda: Consultancy; Agios: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Intellia: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AbbVie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Kite: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte: Speakers Bureau; Shattuck Labs: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Syndax: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Aprea: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Magenta: Consultancy. Padron: Blueprint: Honoraria; Taiho: Honoraria; Incyte: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Stemline: Honoraria; Kura: Research Funding. Komrokji: Taiho Oncology: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; PharmaEssentia: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Geron: Consultancy; AbbVie: Consultancy; Acceleron: Consultancy; Jazz: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; BMSCelgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Ball, Aguirre, Jain, Ali, Chan, and Padron: No conflict of interest to declare., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) treated with DNMTI therapy have responses according to the 2006 IWG response criteria. CR responses have had the strongest association with OS. Recently, CR with partial hematologic recovery (CRh; i.e. blasts &lt;5%, ANC &gt; 500, platelets &gt; 50) has been evaluated in AML, but its relevance is unknown in MDS. We identified adult patients with MDS treated with DNMTIs. We assessed best overall response to therapy according to IWG 2006 criteria, and subsequently identified patients meeting CRh criteria from the subgroup with SD or mCR. We evaluated duration of therapy and overall survival according to response. We identified 311 patients with MDS who received treatment between 2007 and 2018. The median age at the time of therapy was 69 years (range 23-91). Median follow up was 60 months. According to IWG 2006, responses included CR (n = 43, 14%), PR (n = 2, 1%), mCR (n = 57, 18%), SD (n = 149, 48%) and PD (n = 60, 19%). 79 patients (25%) achieved HI. A total of 62 patients (20%) met CRh criteria leading to reclassification of mCR (now n = 26, 8%) or SD (now n = 118, 38%). Patients achieving CR had similar time on therapy (median 8.1mo) compared to CRh (median 6mo, HR 1.4, 95% CI 0.9-2.0), and longer than other responses (p &lt; 0.001). OS varied according to response; median OS was similar between CR (23.3mo) and CRh (25mo, HR 1.28 [0.79-2.08]), which was longer than those with mCR (17.2mo, HR 1.71 [0.96-3.05]), SD (16.3mo, HR 1.61 [1.04-2.48]), and PD (8.7mo, HR 3.04 [1.91-4.83]) (p &lt; 0.001). OS associations with CR/CRh were confirmed in multivariable analysis accounting for allogeneic transplant. MDS patients who achieve a CRh response had similar survival and duration on therapy as patients who achieve CR response and superior to other IWG responses. These data support further evaluation of CRh into future response criteria and clinical trials., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Myeloblast expansion is a hallmark of disease progression and comprises CD34+ hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPC). How this compartment evolves during disease progression in chronic myeloid neoplasms is unknown. Using single-cell RNA sequencing and high-parameter flow cytometry, we show that chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) CD34+ HSPC can be classified into three differentiation trajectories: monocytic, megakaryocyte-erythroid progenitor (MEP), and normal-like. Hallmarks of monocytic-biased trajectory were enrichment of CD120b+ inflammatory granulocyte-macrophage progenitor (GMP)-like cells, activated cytokine receptor signaling, phenotypic hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) depletion, and adverse outcomes. Cytokine receptor diversity was generally an adverse feature and elevated in CD120b+ GMPs. Hypomethylating agents decreased monocytic-biased cells in CMML patients. Given the enrichment of RAS pathway mutations in monocytic-biased cells, NRAS-competitive transplants and LPS-treated xenograft models recapitulated monocytic-biased CMML, suggesting that hematopoietic stress precipitates the monocytic-biased state. Deconvolution of HSPC compartments in other myeloid neoplasms and identifying therapeutic strategies to mitigate the monocytic-biased differentiation trajectory should be explored., Significance: Our findings establish that multiple differentiation states underlie CMML disease progression. These states are negatively augmented by inflammation and positively affected by hypomethylating agents. Furthermore, we identify HSC depletion and expansion of GMP-like cells with increased cytokine receptor diversity as a feature of myeloblast expansion in inflammatory chronic myeloid neoplasms. This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 476., (©2022 American Association for Cancer Research.)