Search

Objectives: HIV outcomes centre primarily around clinical markers with limited focus on patient-reported outcomes. With a global trend towards capturing the outcomes that matter most to patients, there is agreement that standardizing the definition of value in HIV care is key to their incorporation. This study aims to address the lack of routine, standardized data in HIV care., Methods: An international working group (WG) of 37 experts and patients, and a steering group (SG) of 18 experts were convened from 14 countries. The project team (PT) identified outcomes by conducting a literature review, screening 1979 articles and reviewing the full texts of 547 of these articles. Semi-structured interviews and advisory groups were performed with the WG, SG and people living with HIV to add to the list of potentially relevant outcomes. The WG voted via a modified Delphi process - informed by six Zoom calls - to establish a core set of outcomes for use in clinical practice., Results: From 156 identified outcomes, consensus was reached to include three patient-reported outcomes, four clinician-reported measures and one administratively reported outcome; standardized measures were included. The WG also reached agreement to measure 22 risk-adjustment variables. This outcome set can be applied to any person living with HIV aged > 18 years., Conclusions: Adoption of the HIV360 outcome set will enable healthcare providers to record, compare and integrate standardized metrics across treatment sites to drive quality improvement in HIV care., (© 2021 British HIV Association.)

Value-based health care is increasingly promoted as a strategy for improving care quality by benchmarking outcomes that matter to patients relative to the cost of obtaining those outcomes. To support the shift toward value-based health care in chronic kidney disease (CKD), the International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement (ICHOM) assembled an international working group of health professionals and patient representatives to develop a standardized minimum set of patient-centered outcomes targeted for clinical use. The considered outcomes and patient-reported outcome measures were generated from systematic literature reviews. Feedback was sought from patients and health professionals. Patients with very high-risk CKD (stages G3a/A3 and G3b/A2-G5, including dialysis, kidney transplantation, and conservative care) were selected as the target population. Using an online modified Delphi process, outcomes important to all patients were selected, such as survival and hospitalization, and to treatment-specific subgroups, such as vascular access survival and kidney allograft survival. Patient-reported outcome measures were included to capture domains of health-related quality of life, which were rated as the most important outcomes by patients. Demographic and clinical variables were identified to be used as case-mix adjusters. Use of these consensus recommendations could enable institutions to monitor, compare, and improve the quality of their CKD care., (Copyright © 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The practice of breastfeeding is related to socio-demographic characteristics: both show marked variation by place within the United Kingdom. This study set out to test the commonly held assumption that geographical variations in breastfeeding practices are explained by socio-demographic differences., Methods: The mothers of 326 six-week-old babies living in Salisbury or Durham Health Districts were interviewed to determine attitudes to breastfeeding practice., Results: More mothers in Salisbury breastfed than mothers in Durham, both immediately after birth (Salisbury 79 per cent, Durham 54 per cent) and at six weeks (50 per cent and 26 per cent). Higher rates of breastfeeding after birth were associated with higher level of qualification, encouragement to breastfeed antenatally and the mother having been breastfed herself. Higher rates at six weeks were associated with higher level of qualification, higher parity and willingness to breastfeed away from home. The differences between districts persisted after adjustment for these variables, but were diminished when willingness to breastfeed away from home was taken into account., Conclusion: Differences between the two districts in breastfeeding practice cannot be wholly explained by traditional socio-demographic characteristics, and may be related to local culture. Health education is unlikely to change breastfeeding practices unless prevailing cultural attitudes also change.