Search

Prostate cancer (PC) staging with conventional imaging often includes multiparametric magnetic resonance (MR) of the prostate, computed tomography (CT) of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis, and whole-body bone scintigraphy. The recent development of highly sensitive and specific prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography (PET) has suggested that prior imaging techniques may be insufficiently sensitive or specific, particularly when evaluating small pathologic lesions. As PSMA PET/CT is considered to be superior for multiple clinical indications, it is being deployed as the new multidisciplinary standard-of-care. Given this, we performed a cost-effectiveness analysis of [18F]DCFPyL PSMA PET/CT imaging in the evaluation of PC relative to conventional imaging and anti-3-[18F]FACBC (18F-Fluciclovine) PET/CT. We also conducted a single institution review of PSMA PET/CT scans performed primarily for research indications from January 2018 to October 2021. Our snapshot of this period of time in our catchment demonstrated that PSMA PET/CT imaging was disproportionately accessed by men of European ancestry (EA) and those residing in zip codes associated with a higher median household income. The cost-effectiveness analysis demonstrated that [18F]DCFPyL PET/CT should be considered as an alternative to anti-3-[18F]FACBC PET/CT and standard of care imaging for prostate cancer staging. [18F]DCFPyL PET/CT is a new imaging modality to evaluate PC patients with higher sensitivity and specificity in detecting disease than other prostate specific imaging studies. Despite this, access may be inequitable. This discrepancy will need to be addressed proactively as the distribution network of the radiotracer includes both academic and non-academic sites nationwide.

Objectives To investigate the inter- and intra-reader agreement of immune Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (iRECIST) and Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) in patients with lung cancer treated with immunotherapy. Materials and Methods This retrospective study included 85 patients with lung cancer treated with PD-1 blockade. Four radiologists evaluated computed topography (CT) scans before and after initiation of immunotherapy using iRECIST and RECIST 1.1. Weighted kappa (k) with equal weights was used to assess the intra-reader agreement between 2 repeated reads on overall response at all time points, best overall response, and the response at the time point of progression, as well as the intra-reader agreement between iRECIST and RECIST. The inter-reader agreement was calculated using Light’s kappa. Results Intra-reader agreement for overall response at all time points, best overall response, and time point of progression was substantial to almost perfect for both iRECIST and RECIST 1.1 (k = 0.651–0.983). Inter-reader agreement was substantial for iRECIST (κ = 0.657–0.742) while RECIST 1.1 was moderate to substantial (κ = 0.587–0.686). The level of inter-reader agreement was not higher on repeat read for iRECIST (κ = 0.677–0.709 and κ = 0.657–0.742 for first and second read, respectively) as well as for RECIST 1.1 (κ = 0.587–0.659 and κ = 0.633–0.686 for first and second read, respectively). Almost perfect agreement was observed between RECIST 1.1 and iRECIST at first (κ = 0.813–0.923) and second read (κ = 0.841–0.912). Conclusion The inter- and intra-reader agreement of iRECIST is high and similar to RECIST 1.1 in patients with lung cancer treated with immunotherapy.

TPS288 Background: As prostate-specific membrane antigen targeted radiotherapy (PSMA-TRT) is now an active standard-of-care treatment in mCRPC, ongoing studies with alternative approaches to targeting PSMA will increasingly need to consider the consequences of sequential PSMA-TRT exposure. Our past and ongoing investigations into antibody-based targeting (e.g., J591) and potent alpha emitting payloads (e.g., 225Ac) impact drug kinetics, biodistribution, and resultant clinical toxicities. In a first-in-human phase I dose-escalation study of 225Ac-J591, patients with mCRPC were treated with a single dose of 225Ac-J591 on seven dose levels, up to 93.3 KBq/kg without achievement of maximal tolerated dose (MTD). One patient treated at 80 KBq/kg developed dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) of Gr 4 anemia and thrombocytopenia, but 0 of 6 at 93.3 KBq/Kg had Gr > 3 heme toxicity or Gr > 2 non-heme toxicity. Although not intentionally preselected for prior exposure, 55% (12/22) of patients had 177Lu-PSMA previously. With approval of 177Lu vipivotide tetraxetan, we amended an ongoing phase I dose-escalation study to include a post-177-Lu-PSMA cohort. Methods: Entry criteria include progressive mCRPC by PCWG3 criteria, ECOG PS 0-2, intact organ function, and prior receipt of AR pathway inhibitor and chemotherapy (or refused/ineligible). There is no limit to prior lines of therapy except alpha-emitting therapies (i.e., PSMA-TRT, 223Ra) and in this amended dose-escalation cohort, all patients must have had prior treatment with 177Lu-PSMA. Treatment will be given in a single fractionated cycle of 225Ac-J591 administered on D1 and D15. The phase I component is a 3+3 dose-escalation study design with up to 18 patients, with the goal of identifying MTD. The phase II component will include up to 16-19 patients in a Simon 2-stage design with 90% power to exclude the null hypothesis (35% or fewer patients with PSA50). Eligible men with negative PSMA PET scans will be offered treatment with informed consent in an exploratory subgroup but will not be counted towards phase II efficacy. Secondary outcomes include radiographic response by PCWG3-modified RECIST 1.1 criteria and PSMA PET, biochemical and radiographic progression-free survival, circulating tumor cell counts, and overall survival. Patient reported outcomes, genomic, and immune analyses are exploratory. Enrollment to the post-177Lu-PSMA cohort began in August 2022. Clinical trial information: NCT04506567 .

181 Background: Only a small fraction of patients with PC respond to immunotherapy; radiation increases responses. PSMA targeted radionuclide therapy (PSMA-TRT) radiates multiple sites of disease simultaneously. ARSI can lead to radiosensitization and upregulate PSMA and PD-L1 expression. We hypothesize that the addition of potent alpha-PSMA-TRT (225Ac-J591) will lead to double-stranded DNA breaks, cell death, and subsequent release of neoantigens, thereby increasing the response proportion and duration to pembrolizumab plus ARSI. Here, we present preliminary phase I results of a phase I/II study, including an unexpected cytokine release syndrome (CRS). Methods: Eligibility: Progressive mCRPC by PCWG3 criteria (at least one ARSI, no chemotherapy in the mCRPC setting). Patients received ARSI of physician’s choice, pembrolizumab (400mg every 6 weeks), and single infusion of 225Ac-J591 at two different dose levels (65 or 80 KBq/kg). The primary endpoint for phase I is determination of 225Ac-J591 dose for phase II in a pick-the-winner design. Results: 12 patients were treated (6 at 65 KBq/kg, 6 at 80 KBq/kg). 7 (58%) received enzalutamide, 3 (25%) apalutamide, and 2 (17%) darolutamide. Median age 66.5, median PSA 7.75 ng/mL, 6 (50%) CALGB intermediate risk, 4 (33%) low risk, 11 (92%) with bone metastases, 3 (25%) with nodal metastases. 7 (58%) with prior abiraterone, 6 (50%) prior enzalutamide, 5 (42%) sip-T. All patients experienced PSA decline following therapy, 6 (50%) with >50% decline. With >6 months follow-up, 4 (33%; all at 80 KBq/kg) remain progression-free and on study. Of note, 7 (58%) developed an unexpected CRS 7-14 days following treatment characterized by morbilliform rash, fever >101F, and low blood counts. Inflammatory markers were elevated: IL-6 (2.1-7.7 pg/mL), D-Dimer (306-2378 ng/mL), ferritin (361.3-513.4 ng/mL), fibrinogen (386-461 mg/dL), ESR (16-42 mm/hr). After pausing the ARSI, this reaction improved within 1 week. Thrombocytopenia and/or neutropenia occurred during this syndrome, then typically improved before counts fell again at expected nadir 4 weeks after 225Ac-J591. Overall AEs on study include: 9 (75%) thrombocytopenia (3 with g≥3; 1 g4 with PC marrow infiltration), 7 (58%) neutropenia (none g≥3), 6 (50%) nausea, 7 (58%) g1-2 fatigue, 9 (75%) g1-2 xerostomia, 7 (58%) g1 AST. In contrast to heme AEs with unexpected initial occurrence during CRS followed by typical nadir from TRT, the described non-hematologic AEs were generally independent of CRS. 4 (33%) developed typical irAEs: 2 with rash (D60, D62) and 2 hypothyroidism (D77, D82). Conclusions: Combination therapy with alpha-PSMA-TRT, ARSI, and pembrolizumab demonstrates efficacy in the phase I run-in. A key safety signal that has emerged with triplet therapy is CRS that can be managed supportively. The randomized phase II component is accruing with additional safety visits and sample collection for cytokine analysis. Clinical trial information: NCT04946370 .

Highlights • PSMA PET/MRI has a higher true positive rate and sensitivity than mpMRI in patients with biochemically recurrent prostate cancer. • The true positive rate for PSMA PET/MRI was significantly greater in patients who were post prostatectomy for primary treatment. • 40% of patients with a PSA value less than 0.2 ng/mL had a positive PSMA PET/MRI read compared to 9% on MRI., Background The primary objective was to compare the overall diagnostic performance, presented as detection rate of 68Ga-PSMA-HBED-CC positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging (PSMA PET/MRI) versus conventional, multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) in a population of patients with biochemically recurrent prostate cancer. In conjunction with this analysis, secondary objectives included the evaluation of the detection rate stratified by PSA levels and primary treatment modality. Methods A total of 165 PSMA PET MRI were performed from April 2018 to May 2021, of whom 108 were presenting for biochemical recurrent disease. The PSMA PET vertex to thigh were read by two different board-certified nuclear medicine physicians while the MRI head and neck, chest, abdomen, and pelvis (with dedicated, PI-RADS compliant multiparametric prostate MRI) were read by two board certified diagnostic radiologists. Analysis PSMA PET/MRI had a higher detection rate than mpMRI when evaluating patients with biochemical recurrence (BCR) with similar results demonstrated when sub-analysis was performed using PSA levels, primary treatment modality, and time since androgen deprivation therapy. Our study also showed PSMA PET/MRI had a higher sensitivity than mpMRI. Discussion Our findings demonstrate that PSMA PET/MRI is a better imaging modality in the detection of disease in the setting of BCR when compared to MRI alone. Combined utility with PSMA PET/MRI is a powerful tool which can aid in not only the detection of disease, but also guide in treatment planning for prostate cancer patients., Graphical abstract Image, graphical abstract

Introduction: Oncologic patients who develop chemotherapy-associated liver injury (CALI) secondary to chemotherapy treatment tend to have worse outcomes. Biopsy remains the gold standard for the diagnosis of hepatic steatosis. The purpose of this article is to compare 2 alternatives: Proton-Density-Fat-Fraction (PDFF) MRI and MultiMaterial-Decomposition (MMD) DECT. Materials and Methods: 49 consecutive oncologic patients treated with Chemotherapy underwent abdominal DECT and abdominal MRI within 2 weeks of each other. Two radiologists tracked Regions of Interest independently both in the PDFF fat maps and in the MMD DECT fat maps. Non-parametric exact Wilcoxon signed rank test and Cohen’s K were used to compare the 2 sequences and to evaluate the agreement. Results: There was no statistically significant difference in the fat fraction measured as a continuous value between PDFF and DECT between 2 readers. Within the same imaging method (PDFF) the degree of agreement based on the k coefficient between reader 1 and reader 2 is 0.88 (p-value < 0.05). Similarly, for single-source DECT(ssDECT) the degree of agreement based on the k coefficient between reader 1 and reader 2 is 0.97 (p-value < 0.05). Conclusions: The results of this study demonstrate that the hepatic fat fraction of ssDECT with MMD are not significantly different from PDFF. This could be an advantage in an oncological population that undergoes serial CT scans for follow up of chemotherapy response.

To develop and optimize a rapid magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) screening protocol for pancreatic cancer to be performed in conjunction with breast MRI screening in breast cancer susceptibility gene (BRCA)–positive individuals. An IRB-approved prospective study was conducted. The rapid screening pancreatic MR protocol was designed to be less than 10 min to be performed after a standard breast MRI protocol. Protocol consisted of coronal NT T2 SSFSE, axial NT T2 SSFSE and axial NT rFOV FOCUS DWI, and axial T1. Images were acquired with the patient in the same prone position of breast MRI using the built-in body coil. Image quality was qualitatively assessed by two radiologists with 12 and 13 years of MRI experience, respectively. The imaging protocol was modified until an endpoint of five consecutive patients with high-quality diagnostic images were achieved. Signal-to-noise ratio and contrast-to-noise ratio were assessed. The rapid pancreas MR protocol was successfully completed in all patients. Diagnostic image quality was achieved for all patients. Excellent image quality was achieved for low b values; however, image quality at higher b values was more variable. In one patient, a pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor was found and the patient was treated surgically. In four patients, small pancreatic cystic lesions were detected. In one subject, a hepatic mass was identified and confirmed as adenoma by liver MRI. Rapid MR protocol for pancreatic cancer screening is feasible and has the potential to play a role in screening BRCA patients undergoing breast MRI. • Develop and optimize a rapid magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) screening protocol for pancreatic cancer to be performed in conjunction with breast MRI screening in BRCA mutation positive individuals.

Background: PSMA is overexpressed by the majority of PC and may be targeted by both antibodies (mAb) and small molecule ligands (SML), each with differing PSMA binding sites, kinetics, and biodistributions. mAbs have long circulating times (exposing organs such a bone marrow) but are too large to target normal tissue luminal PSMA expression in salivary glands, small bowel, and kidney; SMLs rapidly diffuse to all PSMA+ sites and are excreted by the kidneys within hours. Alpha emitters have high potency over a short range whereas beta emitters have lower energy over a significantly longer range. We hypothesized that combining mAb and SML targeting plus combining alpha and beta emitters offered complementary benefits and would be safe and effective. Methods: A series of cell line and xenograft studies were performed to test mAb vs SML vs combo binding, uptake, and efficacy. A phase I/II clinical trial was initiated, enrolling patients with progressive, PSMA+ (by PSMA PET) mCRPC following potent AR pathway inhibition and chemotherapy (or chemo ineligible/refused)[NCT04886986]. The primary endpoint of phase I is assessment of dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) with secondary endpoints of response, progression-free and overall survival, genomic and imaging correlatives, and patient-reported outcomes. Results: Binding studies demonstrated that mAb plus SML binding was additive rather than competitive in LNCaP and CWR22Rv1 cell lines. Uptake of 177Lu-mAb plus -SML in LNCaP, CWR22rv1, and PC3/PSMA xenograft models demonstrated synergism, with 44-65% greater tumor radioactivity in combination than the sum of the individual agents. Intracellular tracking studies indicate that the mAb re-directs SML to lysosomes from recycling endosomes, maintains retention of SML in tumor cells, and, therefore, prolongs intra-tumoral radioactivity exposure. Survival was prolonged in animals receiving 225Ac-mAb plus 177Lu-SML vs either drug alone (or control). Nine men with median age 68 (range 55-87), PSA 140 (2.4-9614) have been enrolled in both of 2 planned dose-escalation cohorts. 89% with bone, 44% lymph node, 22% liver, 22% lung metastases; 88% with detectable CTC count (75% unfavorable). All had at least 1 metastatic lesion with PSMA PET SUVmax > liver SUVmean, with SUVmax of the single hottest lesion ranging from 11.6-69.9. For the primary endpoint, 0 of 3 with DLT in cohort 1, and with follow up ongoing, no DLT has occurred to date in 6 patients in cohort 2. Of evaluable patients, 5 of 6 with PSA decline (8-97% decline). Conclusions: Targeting PSMA with the combination of mAb and SML leads to synergistic radioactivity in preclinical studies. The combination on mAb and SML radiolabeled with alpha and beta emitters appears safe with short-term follow up with phase 2 enrollment planned. Citation Format: Scott T. Tagawa, Edward Fung, Muhammad O. Niaz, Mahelia Bissassar, Sharon Singh, Amie Patel, Angela Tan, Juana Martinez Zuloaga, Sandra Huicochea Castellanos, Jones T. Nauseef, Ana Molina, Cora Sternberg, David M. Nanus, Joseph Osborne, Neil H. Bander. Results of combined targeting of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) with alpha-radiolabeled antibody 225Ac-J591 and beta-radiolabeled ligand 177Lu-PSMA I&T: preclinical and initial phase 1 clinical data in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr CT143.

e17007 Background: Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) is overexpressed on most prostate cancers (PCs), a fact that has been exploited to perform both targeted imaging and treatment. PSMA-based PET imaging allows for more sensitive detection of PC and can be useful even in the context of negative CT and bone scans. Prior to 2021, research protocols using PSMA-PET (PET) were common at large academic centers, but will likely be more commonplace as standard of care (SOC) after recent FDA approval. With a change in SOC imaging, the impact of cost to patients must be examined. We hypothesize that socioeconomic and demographic-based care disparities may widen and access may narrow in the face of these changes. Methods: We collected demographic data on patients with PC from Weill Cornell Medicine (WCM), Brooklyn Methodist Hospital (BMH), and Columbia University Medical Center (CUMC) who received a PSMA PET scan between 1 January 2018 and 31 January 2022. Data collected included age, zip code, primary language, self-reported race and ethnicity, and type of insurance coverage. Zip codes were used to estimate income strata of patients using publicly-available 2018 IRS adjusted gross income (AGIs) as follows ($): < 25k, 25k-50k, 50k-75k, 75k-100k, 100k-200k, and > 200k. Any AGI strata comprising > 20% of population was counted. Patients were divided into four cohorts: those who had a scan (1) as part of therapeutic-based studies for mCRPC, (2) non-therapeutic imaging studies, (3) as a part of a cost-recovery study with an out-of-pocket cost of $1054, and (4) commercial use under post-approval standards of care (SOC) billed to insurance. Proportion of self-reported race in each cohort was compared against overall race distribution for prostate cancer registry from WCM and CUIMC (Table). Results: 896 patients underwent PSMA PET. Approximately half of all scans were in Cohort 4 (49%, n = 368) including all BMH scans. CUMC scans were 90% in Cohort 2 (122/136). In Cohort 1, 2, and 3, > 90% of subjects resided in zip codes with AGI > $100k. In Cohort 4, 84% resided in zip codes with AGI > $100k. Overall 70.4% of subjects identified as White, 8.3% Black or African American, 3.5% Asian, 4.4% Other, and 13.5% were unknown/or declined. African American/Black was most represented on Cohort 4 (11%), and least represented in Cohort 1 (5%). Conclusions: White patients comprise the largest proportion or PET scans whereas non-white groups are underrepresented across all cohorts. Access to PETs has appeared to improve for lower AGI, non-white patients following FDA approval and insurance coverage. It will be critical to assure equitable access across all demographic groups as deployment of PET scanning becomes the new standard of care.[Table: see text]

PURPOSE: To investigate the value of second-opinion interpretation of cross-sectional images by subspecialized radiologists to diagnose recurrent pancreatic cancer after surgery. METHODS: The IRB approved and issued a waiver of informed consent for this retrospective study. Initial and second-opinion interpretations of 69 consecutive submitted MRI or CT follow up after pancreatic cancer resection between January 1, 2009 and December 31, 2013 were evaluated by one oncologic imaging radiologist, who was blinded to patient’s clinical details and histopathologic data. The reviewer was asked to classify each interpretation in reference of the diagnosis of PDAC recurrence. It was also recorded if the radiologic interpretation recommended additional imaging studies to confirm recurrence. The diagnosis of recurrence was determined by pathology when available, otherwise by imaging follow up, clinical or laboratory assessments. Cohen’s kappa statistic was used to assess agreement between initial and second-opinion interpretations. The differences between the initial and second-opinion interpretations were examined using McNemar test or Bowker’s test of symmetry. RESULTS: Disagreement on recurrence between the initial report and the second-opinion interpretation was observed in 32% of cases (22/69; k=0.44). Second-opinion interpretations had a higher sensitivity and a higher specificity on recurrence compared to the initial interpretations (0.93 vs 0.75 and 0.90 vs 0.68, respectively), and the difference in specificity was significant (p=0.016). Additional imaging studies were recommended more frequently in the initial interpretation (22% vs 6%, p=0.006). CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows the second-opinion interpretation by subspecialized radiologists improves the detection of pancreatic cancer recurrence after surgical resection.

Rationale and Objectives To determine the impact of second-opinion assessment on cancer staging and patient management in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Methods and Materials This retrospective study was approved by our institutional review board with a waiver of informed consent. Second-opinion reports between January 1, 2009 and December 31, 2013, alongside outside reports for 65 consecutive cases of biopsy-proven pancreatic adenocarcinomas, were presented in random order to two experienced abdominal surgeons who independently reviewed them blinded to the origin of the report, images of the examinations, and patient identifier. Each surgeon filled in a questionnaire for each report recommending cancer staging and patient management. Recommended patient management and staging were evaluated against reference standards (actual patient management at 6 months following second-opinion assessment, and pathology or other clinical and imaging reference standards at 6 months or longer, respectively) using Cohen kappa. Results Cancer staging differed in 13% (9 of 65) of cases for surgeon 1 and in 18.4% (12 of 65) for surgeon 2. Patient management changed in 38.4% (25 of 65) of cases for surgeon 1 and in 20% (13 of 65) for surgeon 2. When compared to the pathologic staging gold standard, second opinion was correct in 85.7% (six of seven) of the time for both surgeons. Recommended patient management from second-opinion reports showed good agreement with the reference standard (weighted k = 0.6467 [0.4014–0.892] and weighted k = 0.6262 [0.3954–0.857] for surgeon 2). Conclusion Second-opinion review by subspecialized oncologic radiologists can impact patient care, specifically in terms of management decision.

A 70-year-old man with a history of carcinoid tumor of small bowel was referred for Ga-DOTATOC study to evaluate the extent of disease. PET/CT scan revealed known metastatic disease in the liver, with other sites of involvement including pancreas, peritoneum, and bones. In addition, moderately intense uptake was noted in proximal right tibia and further correlation on CT showed metaphyseal lesion with "rings and arcs" calcification suggestive of enchondroma. This case highlights the possibility of overexpression of somatostatin receptors in enchondromas, which has been little explored in literature.