Search

Background Renal transplant patients have a high prevalence of nocturnal hypertension, and hypertension misclassification by office blood pressure (BP) is quite common in these patients. The potential impact of hypertension misclassification by office BP on hypertension management in this population has never been analysed. Methods We performed a longitudinal study in a cohort of 260 clinically stable renal transplant patients. In all, 785 paired office and 24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (24-hABPM) measurements over a median follow-up of 3.9 years were available in the whole cohort. Results A total of 74% of patients had nocturnal hypertension (>120/70 mmHg). Average office BP and 24-hABPM remained quite stable over follow-up, as did the prevalence of nocturnal hypertension, which was 77% at the last observation. However, the global agreement between office BP and average 24 h, daytime and night-time BP was unsatisfactory (k-statistics 0.10–0.26). In 193 visits (25% of all visits) where office BP indicated the need of antihypertensive therapy institution or modification (BP >140/90 mmHg), 24-hABPM was actually normal (<130/80 mmHg), while in 94 visits (12%), 24-hABPM was in the hypertensive range while office BP was normal. Overall, in 37% of visits, office BP provided misleading therapeutic indications. Conclusions Hypertension misclassification by office BP is a common phenomenon in stable renal transplant patients on long-term follow-up. Office BP may lead to inappropriate therapeutic decisions in over one-third of follow-up visits in these patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

BackgroundCaveolae are a prominent microdomain in endothelial cells and appropriate localization in caveolae is fundamental for endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) activity. Since the Glu298Asp variant in the eNOS gene alters caveolar localization of the corresponding enzyme, we tested the interaction between this variant and the rs4730751 polymorphism of the caveolin-1 (CAV-1) gene as related to arterial remodeling in end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients.MethodsOne hundred and thirty-three ethnically homogeneous ESRD patients underwent carotid ultrasonographic studies to measure intima-media thickness (IMT) and carotid cross-sectional area (CSA). Genotyping was performed by high-throughput allelic discrimination assays on real-time PCR.ResultsArterial remodeling was associated to the number of G alleles of CAV-1 polymorphism, GG homozygotes displaying an IMT and a CSA that were, respectively, 16% and 21% higher than those in patients without the risk allele (P < 0.012). In multiple linear regression analyses including the CAV-1 and the eNOS polymorphisms and adjusting for classical risk factors and risk factors peculiar to ESRD both polymorphisms were independent correlates of IMT (CAV-1: β = 0.20, P = 0.01; eNOS β = 0.25, P = 0.001) and CSA (CAV-1: β = 0.20, P = 0.01: eNOS β = 0.13, P = 0.09). Furthermore, strong interactions emerged between the two polymorphisms for explaining the variability in IMT (P = 0.001) and in CSA (P = 0.038) in these patients.ConclusionOverall these findings form preliminary evidence that disturbed interaction between CAV-1 and eNOS may be of relevance for arterial disease in ESRD and perhaps in other human diseases.American Journal of Hypertension (2012). doi:10.1038/ajh.2011.178 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]