Search

Purpose: We aimed to investigate the potential of [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT as an alternative diagnostic and theranostic tool in well-differentiated NETs refractory to [177Lu]Lu-DOTATATE therapy. Methods: Patients who received at least two cycles of [177Lu]Lu-DOTATATE therapy for metastatic NETs and progressed under treatment were included. All patients had performed [68Ga]Ga-DOTATATE and [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT within 3 weeks. The number of PET-positive lesions related to NETs and tumor sites was documented. Mann-Whitney U and chi-square tests were used to compare SUVmax levels of tracers and the number of detected metastases. Results: Twelve patients (7 male, 5 female) who met the eligibility criteria were included in the study. Ten patients had grade 1–2 NET of various origins, and two had paraganglioma and pheochromocytoma. One hundred ninety-eight of 230 lesions (86%) were SSTR positive with a median SUVmax of 16.6 (2.2–76.5), and 88 of 230 lesions (38.2%) were [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 positive with a median SUVmax of 5.1 (2.3–21). Median SUVmax level and detected number of tumors were significantly higher in [68Ga]Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT (p=<0.001). [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT was completely (n:2) or almost completely (n:3) negative in 5 (42%) patients. Two (17%) patients had flip-flop SSTR/FAPI uptake in tumors. In four patients (33%), tumor uptake or the number of PET-positive lesions was inferior in [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT. In only one patient (8%), tumor uptakes were higher in [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT. Low-dose [177Lu]Lu-FAPI-46 dosimetry was performed on the FAPI-dominant patient; absorbed radiation doses per GBq were 1.26 Gy, 0.36 Gy, 0.32 Gy, and 0.2 Gy for kidneys, liver, spleen, and total body, respectively. The mean absorbed dose per GBq was 0.33 Gy for liver mass and 0.41 Gy for metastatic lymph nodes. Conclusion: Our preliminary results demonstrated that [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT mainly failed in well-differentiated NETs refractory to [177Lu]Lu-DOTATATE therapy and had a limited role as an alternative diagnostic or theranostic agent. Further investigations with a larger patient population are required to determine the impact of [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT on NETs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: We aimed to investigate the role of [68 Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT and uptake patterns of primary and metastatic lesions in patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Methods: Twenty patients with a suspicious lesion considered primary renal malignancy or a history of RCC were included in our study. Two patients were excluded from further analyses due to other confirmed malignancies. Six patients were newly diagnosed, while the indication of 12 patients was restaging. All patients underwent [68 Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 and [18F]F-FDG PET/CT. SUVmax and tumor-to-background ratio (TBR) of primary (n = 7) and local recurrent lesions (n = 6) and lymph node (n = 26), lung (n = 32), bone (n = 5), and other metastases (n = 14) were compared between the two tracers. Results: We detected 90 lesions in 18 patients with varying FAPI and FDG uptake values on both PET/CT. The median TBR of FAPI-PET/CT of all lesions was higher than TBR of FDG-PET/CT with statistically significance (5.6 vs. 2.1, p < 0.001). In primary and recurrent lesions, the median SUVmax, TBR, and tumor volume on FAPI-PET/CT were higher than FDG-PET/CT. The median SUVmax of lung lesions on FAPI-PET/CT was statistical significantly higher than FDG-SUVmax (3.8 vs. 1.8, p = 0.02). The median of FAPI-SUVmax on primary lesions was lower in the early stage based on TNM compared to the advanced stage. FAPI-SUVmax in 49% of all lesions were SUVmax ≥ 6, and 13% were SUVmax ≥ 10. In patient-based analyses, seven patients (39%) had at least one lesion with FAPI-SUVmax ≥ 10; 12 patients (67%) had at least one lesion with FAPI-SUVmax ≥ 6. Conclusion: This study showed the potential utility of [68 Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT showing promising results in RCC. We have presumed that FAPI-PET/CT may be performed for complementary imaging modality providing prognosis and possibility of theranostic application in selected patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To compare the adipose and muscle tissue areas in patients who responded differently to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Methods: One hundred and eighty six patients diagnosed with breast cancer who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy between January 2015- October 2019 and were operated after the treatment were retrospectively included in the study. Pathological results were divided into five groups using the Miller-Payne grading systems. Grade 1 indicating no significant reduction in malignant cells; Grade 2: a minor loss of malignant cells (≤ 30 %); Grade 3: reduction in malignant cells between 30 % and 90 %; Grade 4: disappearance of malignant cells >90 %; Grade 5: no malignant cells identifiable. Pre-treatment PET CT scans were evaluated, and calculation of body composition parameters were performed on a single axial section passing through the L3 vertebrae. Spearman’s correlation test was used to analyze the correlation between SAT, VAT, MT parameters and pathological responses. Results: There was no strong correlation between the 5 groups separated according to neoadjuvant chemotherapy treatment response and tissue distributions. However, that there was a very low correlation found between superficial adipose tissue and pathological response (r=, 156). Conclusion: In conclusion, our results have provided a very low correlation between SAT and more than 30 % response. More research is required to evaluate the role of the body fat and muscle parameters in response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in larger patient populations.