Search

Objectives Endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) is an increasingly popular treatment option for patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA), although open repair is considered the standard by virtue of its durability. Octogenarians, as a subgroup, may stand to benefit the most by EVAR. The purpose of this study is to review operative results and durability of open AAA repair and EVAR in octogenarians. Methods From May 1996 to August 2006, 150 patients aged ≥80 years underwent elective repair of their infrarenal AAA. Eighty-one underwent EVAR and 69 had open repair. Demographic data, aneurysm specifics, comorbidities, operative morbidity and mortality, intensive care unit and hospital length of stay, and late outcomes were analyzed. Results In the EVAR group, 27 of 81 (33%) patients died during a mean follow-up of 25 months. In the open repair group, 34 of 69 (49%) patients died during a mean follow-up of 43 months. The median survival time for EVAR was 350 weeks (range, 145-404 weeks) compared with 317 weeks (range, 233-342 weeks) for the open repair group. A Kaplan-Meier log-rank analysis showed no difference in early or long-term survival between EVAR and open repair ( P = .13). EVAR was associated with decreased blood loss, decreased length of intensive care unit and hospital stays, and a greater number of patients discharged to home. Conclusions EVAR and open repair are comparable in safety and efficacy in octogenarians. Operative repair outcomes remain acceptable. Mid- and long-term survival are similar, indicating no survival advantage of one procedure compared with the other.

Objective Correlation of carotid duplex ultrasound (DUS) flow velocities with carotid artery stenosis before and after carotid endarterectomy is well established. With the evolution of catheter-based techniques, carotid stenosis increasingly is being treated with angioplasty and stenting (CAS). CAS changes the physical properties of the arterial wall, which may alter blood flow velocities compared with the nonstented carotid. Opinions differ about whether DUS is a reliable tool to assess technical outcome and recurrent stenosis after CAS. This study correlated carotid DUS flow velocity findings with carotid arteriography after CAS. Methods Data from 77 pairs of carotid arteriograms with corresponding DUS after CAS in 68 patients were reviewed. Preintervention and postintervention DUS and carotid arteriogram data were evaluated for each patient. Peak systolic velocities (PSV), end-diastolic velocities (EDV), and internal carotid artery/common carotid artery ratios (ICA/CCA) were correlated with the post-CAS arteriogram. Results The mean preintervention PSV was 390 ± 110 cm/s (range, 216 to 691 cm/s), and the average EDV was 134 ± 51 cm/s (range, 35 to 314 cm/s). Postintervention DUS was obtained a mean of 5 days after CAS (range, 1 to 30 days). Sixty (81%) post-CAS arteriograms were normal, and each corresponded to a normal postintervention DUS (PSV range, 30 to 118 cm/s; EDV range, 18 to 60 cm/s). In 14 arteries (19%), completion arteriograms revealed residual stenoses of 20% to 40% in 13, and 50% in one. The mean PSV was 175 cm/s (range, 137 to 195 cm/s), and the mean EDV was 44 cm/s (range, 20 to 62 cm/s). All velocities exceeded the threshold of a 50% stenosis by DUS criteria for a nonstented carotid artery. In three arteries (2 patients), high-grade recurrent stenoses detected by DUS developed that required reintervention during follow-up. This high-grade restenosis was confirmed by arteriography in each patient, providing an additional three correlations. Conclusions Normal DUS imaging reliably identifies arteriographically normal carotid arteries after CAS. Carotid velocities are disproportionately elevated with mild and moderate degrees of stenoses, and velocity criteria for quantitating stenoses in these patients require modification. However, DUS appropriately identifies severe recurrent stenoses after CAS.

ObjectivesThe development of endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) as an alternative to open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) has led to an increasing number of patients being treated by this less-invasive technique. It was anticipated that EVAR would reduce the operative mortality and morbidity compared with open repair. This study examined the initial 10-year experience in one center when both techniques were available to determine if there were advantages to one technique or the other, putting the results into the perspective of routine clinical care of patients with infrarenal AAA.MethodsFrom June 1996 to May 2005, 677 patients underwent elective repair of their infrarenal AAA, of which 417 were treated with open repair and 260 by EVAR. Demographic and aneurysm-specific data, comorbidities, operative morbidity, mortality, and late outcome were analyzed.ResultsOpen repair patients were 2 years younger (71 vs 74 years, P < .001), had larger aneurysms (6.01 ± 1.38 cm vs 5.45 ± 0.99 cm, P < .001), greater familial predisposition, a higher incidence of current smokers, and a higher incidence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease than the EVAR group. There were no differences in renal function, hypertension, coronary artery disease, or heart failure between the two groups. Overall operative mortality was 3.1%; operative mortality per group was 3.5% for open and 2.7% for EVAR (P = .627). Procedure-related outcomes showed significant differences in operative blood loss and length of hospital stay in favor of EVAR, and 95% of the EVAR patients were discharged home vs 83% in the open repair group (P < .001). A Kaplan-Meier log-rank analysis showed no difference in early or long-term survival between open repair and EVAR (P = .20), but did show a difference in mid-term (3-year) survival favoring open repair (P < .002). Survival analysis by age (

Background: Abdominal vascular injuries incur high mortality rates. The purposes of this study are (1) review institutional experience, (2) determine additive effect on mortality of multiple vessel injuries, (3) determine mortality of combined arterial and venous injuries, and (4) correlate mortality with American Association for the Surgery of Trauma–Organ Injury Scale (AAST-OIS) for abdominal vascular injury. Methods: A retrospective 6-year study was made at an urban level I trauma center of patients with abdominal vascular injuries. Main outcome measure was survival. Results: (1) There was a total of 302 patients, mean age 28, mean Injury Severity Score (ISS) 25 (range 4 to 75). Mechanism of injury was penetrating in 266 (88%), blunt in 36 (12%). Emergency Department thoracotomy was done in 43 of 302 (14%), 504 vessels were injured: arteries 238(47%), veins 266(53%). Surgical management was ligation 245, primary repair 141, prosthetic interposition grafts 24, autogenous 2. Overall mortality was 162 of 302 (54%). (2) Mortality multiple vessels injured: 1 vessel 160 (45%), 2 vessels 102 (60%), 3 vessels 33 (73%), >4 vessels 5 (100%). Mortality arterial injuries: aorta isolated (I) 78% versus combined with other arterial injuries (C) 82.4%, superior mesenteric artery (SMA) I 47.6% versus C 71.4%, iliac I 53% versus C 72.7%, renal I 37.5% versus C 66.7%. Venous injuries: inferior vena cava (IVC) isolated (I) 70% versus combined with other venous injuries (C) 77.7%, superior mesenteric vein (SMV) I 52.7% versus C 65%, IMV I 16% versus C 50%. (3) Specific mortality combined arterial and venous injuries: aorta plus IVC 93%, SMA plus SMV 43%, iliac artery plus vein 45.5%. (4) Mortality versus AAST-OIS: grade II 25%, grade III 32%, grade IV 65%, grade V 88%. Conclusions: Abdominal vascular injuries are highly lethal. Multiple arterial and venous injuries increase mortality. Mortality correlates with AAST-OIS for abdominal vascular injury.

Angiographic embolization of bleeding pelvic vessels is increasingly used in patients with pelvic injuries. Temporary angiographic embolization of bilateral internal iliac arteries (TAEBIIA) is occasionally necessary. From November 1991 to March 1998, 30 consecutive patients (mean age of 43 years, mean Injury Severity Score of 25) with complex pelvic fractures underwent TAEBIIA to control severe hemorrhage not responding to subselective embolization. Angiography revealed multiple sources of pelvic bleeding in 28 (93%) patients. In the two remaining patients, no bleeding was identified but TAEBIIA was done empirically. Thirteen patients had laparotomies before TAEBIIA with unsuccessful bleeding control, and the remaining 17 had TAEBIIA as the primary treatment. After TAEBIIA 90 per cent of patients had successful clinical (27 of 30) and radiographic (25 of 28) control of bleeding. Of the three patients who continued to bleed after TAEBIIA two were successfully re-embolized and one died of acute cardiac failure before any further intervention was attempted. TAEBIIA had a success rate of 97 per cent (29 of 30) in controlling pelvic hemorrhage without significant complications related to it. TAEBIIA is a safe and effective alternative to subselective embolization in controlling retroperitoneal bleeding in selected patients with blunt pelvic trauma.

Background: Angiographic embolization is an effective technique to control bleeding after blunt trauma to the liver or pelvis. Its role in penetrating trauma to the abdomen has not been studied. Methods: From January 1992 to May 1998, 40 patients underwent angiography for bleeding resulting from intra-abdominal penetrating injuries (33 gunshot wounds, 7 stab wounds). Angiographic embolization of intraperitoneal or retroperitoneal vessels was performed by standard angiographic techniques with gelatin sponge and/or coils. Data were extracted from medical records, radiology data bank, trauma registry, and morbidity/mortality records, and compared by Student's t test and chi-square test. The main outcome measures were failure of angiographic embolization to control bleeding and complications of angiographic embolization. Results: Angiography was performed during a course of nonoperative management in 6 patients (group A), because of failure to control bleeding surgically in 23 (group B), and because of late vascular complications after an initially successful operation in 11 more (group C). In 32 patients, angiography revealed active bleeding; 29 (91%) underwent successful angiographic embolization. Of the remaining 3 patients, 2 were successfully managed surgically (1 each from groups A and B) and 1 died despite multiple surgical maneuvers (group B). One patient who developed postoperatively a large, bleeding superior mesenteric artery pseudoaneurysm, suffered extensive bowel necrosis after angiographic embolization. No other significant complication was related to angiographic embolization. Conclusions: Angiographic embolization after penetrating injuries to the abdomen is safe and effective for a small number of selected patients. It is a valuable tool for bleeding control when surgery has failed. It may be ideal for control of late vascular complications when reoperation is not desirable. It may prove to be a useful adjunct in the nonoperative treatment of selected injuries.

Background: Selective nonoperative management of blunt liver injuries has become standard practice in most trauma centers. We evaluated the role of selective nonoperative management of gunshot wounds to the liver. Study Design: This was a retrospective review of gunshot wounds to the liver treated in a level I trauma center. Patients with peritoneal signs or hemodynamic instability were operated on without delay. Patients with a soft, nontender abdomen and no signs of heavy bleeding were selected for nonoperative management. Liver injury was diagnosed by CT scan. If peritonitis or signs of substantial internal bleeding developed, an operation was performed; otherwise the patient was discharged within a few days of admission. Analysis was restricted to the group of patients with isolated liver injuries. Results: During a 42-month period, 928 patients were admitted with abdominal gunshot injuries, 152 of whom (16%) had a liver injury. In 52 patients (34% of all liver injuries), the liver was the only injured intraabdominal organ (4 patients had associated kidney or splenic injuries that did not require surgical repair). Thirty-six of the patients (69%) with isolated liver injuries had an emergent operation because of signs of peritonitis or hemodynamic instability. The remaining 16 patients (31%) were selected for nonoperative management (3 patients had associated right kidney injury). Five patients in the observed group required delayed operation because of development of signs of peritonitis (4 patients) or abdominal compartment syndrome (1 patient). The remaining 11 patients (7% of all liver injuries or 21% of isolated liver injuries) were managed successfully without operation. One patient with delayed operation developed multiple complications from abdominal compartment syndrome, and 1 patient in the nonoperative group had a biloma, which was treated with percutaneous drainage. Conclusions: Selected patients with isolated grades I and II gunshot wounds to the liver can be managed nonoperatively.

Subclavian and axillary vascular injuries are notorious for their mortality and their difficult surgical exposure. In the present study we analyze our experience with 79 patients and describe the techniques used for surgical access to these vessels.Retrospective review of the medical records of all patients with penetrating injuries to the subclavian or axillary vessels who had been admitted to 2 Los Angeles trauma centers during a 4-year, 3-month period.Seventy-nine patients were admitted during the study period January 1993 to March 1997 (58 gunshot injuries, 21 other penetrating injuries). The artery was injured in 59 patients and the vein in 40 (20 patients had both arterial and venous injuries). Eighteen patients (23%) were admitted with no signs of life or were in extremis and underwent an emergency room thoracotomy without any survivors. Fifty-eight patients underwent exploration in the operating room, 1 patient with an arteriovenous subclavian fistula was successfully managed with a radiologically placed endovascular stent, and 2 patients with minimal subclavian artery injuries were managed nonoperatively. Overall mortality was 34.2%. Excluding the ER thoracotomies the overall mortality was 14.8%. The mortality for isolated arterial injuries was 20.5%, for isolated venous injuries 50%, and for both vessels 45.0%. The mortality in venous injuries was significantly higher than in arterial injuries (p0.05). The standard clavicular incision provided adequate exposure in 32 (50.0%) of the operating room cases. In the other 50% of operating room cases a combination of a clavicular incision with a median sternotomy or thoracotomy was necessary. Proximal subclavian injuries may be accessed through a clavicular incision combined with a median sternotomy irrespective of left or right site location.Subclavian and axillary vascular injuries remain lethal. A clavicular incision provides satisfactory surgical exposure in about half the patients. In patients with proximal injuries addition of a median sternotomy provides adequate surgical access in both right and left subclavian vessels.

Background: Some authors have stated that virtually all patients with penetrating colon injuries can be safely managed with primary repair. The purpose of this study is to test the applicability of this statement to all trauma patients by evaluating a protocol of liberal primary repair applied to a group of patients at high risk of septic complications. Study Design: We performed a prospective analysis of a liberal policy of primary repair applied to patients at high risk of developing postoperative septic complications admitted to a Level I urban trauma center. Inclusion criteria were full-thickness colon injury and at least one of three additional risk factors: 1) Penetrating Abdominal Trauma Index (PATI) of 25 or more; 2) 6 U or more of blood transfused; and 3) 6 hours or longer elapsed between injury and surgery. Results: Of 56 patients studied (55 male, 1 female, average age 28.8 years, mean PATI 35.3), the vast majority had gunshot wounds as the mechanism of injury (89%), PATI 25 or more (95%), multiple blood transfusions (77%), an Injury Severity Score greater than 15 (66%), and a need for postoperative ventilatory support in the surgical intensive care unit (61%). Of 56 patients, 49 (88%) had at least one colonic suture line, and 25 patients (45%) had destructive colon injuries requiring resection. Intraabdominal infections occurred in 15 (27%) of 56 patients and colon suture line disruption occurred in 3 (6%) of 49. Two of these patients developed multisystem organ failure, and death was directly related to breakdown of their colonic anastomosis. Conclusions: On the basis of these data and the relative infrequency of patients in prospective randomized trials with destructive colon injuries, we believe there is still room for consideration of fecal diversion in patients in high-risk categories with destructive colon injuries requiring resection.

Objectives: To analyze the parameters measured in the field, during transport, and upon arrival of the physiologic condition of patients sustaining penetrating cardiac injuries, along with the Cardiovascular Respiratory Score (CVRS) component of the Trauma Score, the mechanism and anatomical site of injury, operative characteristics, and cardiac rhythm as predictors of outcome. We also set out to identify a set of patient characteristics that best predict mortality outcome and to correlate cardiac injury grade as determined by the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma-Organ Injury Scale (AAST-OIS) with mortality. Methods: This report was a prospective study at American College of Surgeons Level I urban trauma center. Interventions included thoracotomy, sternotomy, or both, for resuscitation and definitive repair of cardiac injury. The main outcome measures used were those parameters measuring physiologic condition of patients, CVRS, mechanism and anatomical site of injury, mortality, and grade of injury. Results: A total of 105 patients sustained penetrating cardiac injuries: 68 injuries (65%) were gunshot wounds and 37 injuries (35%) were stab wounds. The mean Injury Severity Score was 36. Of the 105 wounds, 23 wounds (22%) involved multiple-chamber injuries. The overall survival was 35 of 105 patients (33%): survival of gunshot wound victims was 11 of 68 patients (16%); survival of stab wound victims was 24 of 37 patients (65%). Emergency department thoracotomy was performed in 71 of the 105 patients (68%) with 10 survivors (14%). CVRS: 94% mortality (50 of 53) when CVRS = 0, 89% mortality (57 of 64) when CVRS = 0 to 3, and 31% mortality (12 of 39) when CVRS 4 to 11 (p < 0.001). The presence of sinus rhythm when pericardium was opened predicted survival (p < 0.001). Anatomical site of injury (injured chamber) and the presence of tamponade did not predict survival. Stepwise logistic regression analysis identified gunshot wound, exsanguination, and restoration of blood pressure as most predictive variables of mortality. AAST-OIS injury grade and mortality: grade I, 0 of 1 (0%); grade II, 1 of 2 (50%); grade III, 2 of 3 (66%); grade IV, 28 of 50 (56%); grade V, 29 of 38 (76%); grade VI, 10 of 11 (91%). Overall incidence: grades IV-VI, 99 of 105 (94%). Conclusions: Parameters measuring physiologic condition, CVRS, and mechanism of injury are significant predictors of outcome in penetrating cardiac injuries. AAST-OIS injury grades I-III are rare in penetrating cardiac trauma. AAST-OIS Injury grades IV-VI are common in penetrating cardiac trauma and accurately predict outcome.

Objective: Cervical hematoma (CH) following carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is a serious complication. We reviewed 12 years of CEA for CH requiring operative evacuation to determine its impact on the patient outcome and relationship to perioperative pharmacotherapy. Methods: A total of 2643 CEAs were reviewed. In all, 57 CHs requiring operative evacuation were compared to all the patients for general characteristics and with a case-controlled cohort group for pharmacologic details. Results: The occurrence of CH was stable from 1994 to 1998 and then increased from 1999 to 2003. The CH increased operative mortality, neurologic complications, adverse cardiac events, and cranial nerve injury. Combined platelet inhibition and dextran alone increased the risk of CH. The CH rate dropped by 65% after the observations were reported to the vascular surgeons. Conclusion: The CH following CEA requiring operative evacuation is associated with increased postoperative mortality and cardiac and neurologic morbidity. Combined platelet inhibition, use of dextran, and elevated creatinine are causally related to CH. Physician awareness and modified pharmacotherapy have decreased the problem.

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs), defined by the presence of constitutively activated KIT, are the most common gastrointestinal mesenchymal malignancies. This observation has been successfully exploited in clinical trials of Gleevec (also known as imatinib mesylate, STI-571) for patients with unresectable and/or metastatic GISTs. The biological mechanisms of Gleevec as well as its downstream molecular effects are generally unknown. We used a DNA microarray-based approach to identify gene expression patterns and signaling pathways that were altered in response to Gleevec in GIST cells. We identified a total of 148 genes or expressed sequence tags (of 10,367) that were differentially regulated; 7 known genes displayed a durable response after treatment. The significantly down-regulated genes were SPRY4A, FZD8, PDE2A, RTP801, FLJ20898, and ARHGEF2. The only up-regulated gene was MAFbx. On a functional level, we demonstrated that imatinib inhibited phosphorylation of KIT, AKT, and extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 without affecting the total level of these proteins and that differential expression of these response genes involved activation of mitogen-activated protein kinase-dependent and -independent pathways. In an attempt to correlate these in vitro findings to clinical data, we examined GIST needle biopsy specimens taken from patients before and after Gleevec administration according to the CSTI571-B2222 Phase II trial and demonstrated that expression levels of the two gene transcripts evaluated correlated well with clinical response. This study emphasizes the potential value of an in vitro cell model to investigate GIST response to imatinib in vivo, for the purpose of identifying important genetic markers of clinical response, mechanisms of drug action, and possible therapeutic targets.

Publisher Summary The anatomic components contributing to ambulatory venous hypertension are venous valvular incompetence and luminal obstruction. It has been consistently shown that the most severe postthrombotic sequelae and the highest ambulatory venous pressures occur in patients with valvular incompetence accompanied by luminal venous obstruction. Venous obstruction is not synonymous with occlusion. Occlusion is complete obliteration whereas obstruction (for the most part) is relative narrowing of the lumen. Although relative degrees of obstruction are reliably quantitated on the arterial side of the circulation, technology has not advanced to the point that allows this degree of accuracy on the venous side. Furthermore, physicians often cannot put venous obstruction into proper perspective pathophysiologically, in terms of its contribution to postthrombotic discomfort or distal leg soft-tissue damage. Unfortunately, physiologic testing on the venous side of the circulation has not kept pace with similar advances on the arterial side of the vascular tree. Vascular laboratories have traditionally (and paradoxically) tested the hemodynamics of venous obstruction with patients in the resting, supine position with their legs elevated, which is the standard position for measuring maximum venous outflow, the commonly accepted test for venous obstruction.

Background: The literature on early management of gunshot wounds (GSWs) to the face is scant, with only six series reported in the English-language literature in the last 12 years. In the current study, we present a large series from a busy trauma center in an effort to identify early diagnostic and therapeutic problems and recommend management guidelines. Methods: Retrospective analysis was done for all GSWs of the face during a 4-year period. Data were obtained from the Trauma Registry and Trauma Patient Summary hard copies. Results: During the study period, there were 4,139 admissions for GSWs, with 247 (6%) involving the face. An associated brain trauma was found in 42 patients (17.0%), and cervical spine fracture was found in 20 patients (8.1%) with GSWs to the face. In 43 patients (17.4%), there was a need for emergency airway control because of local hematoma or edema. Angiography was performed in 70 patients (28.3%) for evaluation of a large hematoma or continuous bleeding, and in 10 of these patients successful embolization of bleeders was achieved. No patient required operative control of bleeding from facial structures. Overall, only 96 patients (38.9%) underwent operation for soft-tissue repair or reduction of facial bone fractures. There were 36 deaths (14.5%) from severe brain injury or severe bleeding from associated chest or abdominal injuries. No death occurred in isolated GSWs to the face. Conclusion: Most civilian GSWs can safely be managed nonoperatively. Airway control is required in a significant number of patients and should be established very early. Bleeding from the face is best controlled angiographically. The brain and cervical spine should be aggressively assessed radiologically because of the high incidence of associated trauma.

We present a patient with a rare anomaly of the aortic arch. Angiography revealed an aberrant right subclavian artery (aRSA) originating from the middle of the aortic arch. Angiography also demonstrated an anomalous origin of the left common carotid artery sharing a common trunk with the innominate artery and a large right vertebral artery arising from the right common carotid artery. Although this particular combination of anomalies has been reported in cadaver cases, to our knowledge this is the first premortem angiographic description of a patient in which an aRSA originates from the middle of the arch between the anomalous bovine arch trunk and the left subclavian trunk.

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs), defined by the presence of constitutively activated KIT, are the most common gastrointestinal mesenchymal malignancies. This observation has been successfully exploited in clinical trials of Gleevec (also known as imatinib mesylate, STI-571) for patients with unresectable and/or metastatic GISTs. The biological mechanisms of Gleevec as well as its downstream molecular effects are generally unknown. We used a DNA microarray-based approach to identify gene expression patterns and signaling pathways that were altered in response to Gleevec in GIST cells. We identified a total of 148 genes or expressed sequence tags (of 10,367) that were differentially regulated; 7 known genes displayed a durable response after treatment. The significantly down-regulated genes were SPRY4A, FZD8, PDE2A, RTP801, FLJ20898, and ARHGEF2. The only up-regulated gene was MAFbx. On a functional level, we demonstrated that imatinib inhibited phosphorylation of KIT, AKT, and extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 without affecting the total level of these proteins and that differential expression of these response genes involved activation of mitogen-activated protein kinase-dependent and -independent pathways. In an attempt to correlate these in vitro findings to clinical data, we examined GIST needle biopsy specimens taken from patients before and after Gleevec administration according to the CSTI571-B2222 Phase II trial and demonstrated that expression levels of the two gene transcripts evaluated correlated well with clinical response. This study emphasizes the potential value of an in vitro cell model to investigate GIST response to imatinib in vivo, for the purpose of identifying important genetic markers of clinical response, mechanisms of drug action, and possible therapeutic targets.

The purpose of this study was to define the period of time after which delays in management incurred by investigations cause increased morbidity and mortality. The outcome study is intended to correlate time with death from esophageal causes, overall complications, esophageal related complications, and surgical intensive care unit length of stay.This was a retrospective multicenter study involving 34 trauma centers in the United States, under the auspices of the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma Multi-institutional Trials Committee over a span of 10.5 years. Patients surviving to reach the operating room (OR) were divided into two groups: those that underwent diagnostic studies to identify their injuries (preoperative evaluation group) and those that went immediately to the OR (no preoperative evaluation group). Statistical methods included Fisher's exact test, Student's T test, and logistic regression analysis.The study involved 405 patients: 355 male patients (86.5%) and 50 female patients (13.5%). The mean Revised Trauma Score was 6.3, the mean Injury Severity Score was 28, and the mean time interval to the OR was 6.5 hours. There were associated injuries in 356 patients (88%), and an overall complication rate of 53.5%. Overall mortality was 78 of 405 (19%). Three hundred forty-six patients survived to reach the OR: 171 in the preoperative evaluation group and 175 in the no preoperative evaluation group. No statistically significant differences were noted in the two groups in the following parameters: number of patients, age, Injury Severity Score, admission blood pressure, anatomic location of injury (cervical or thoracic), surgical management (primary repair, resection and anastomosis, resection and diversion, flaps), number of associated injuries, and mortality. Average length of time to the OR was 13 hours in the preoperative evaluation group versus 1 hour in the no preoperative evaluation group (p0.001). Overall complications occurred in 134 in the preoperative evaluation group versus 87 in the no preoperative evaluation group (p0.001), and 74 (41%) esophageal related complications occurred in the preoperative evaluation group versus 32 (19%) in the no preoperative evaluation group (p = 0.003). Mean surgical intensive care unit length of stay was 11 days in the preoperative evaluation group versus 7 days in the no preoperative evaluation group (p = 0.012). Logistic regression analysis identified as independent risk factors for the development of esophageal related complications included time delays in preoperative evaluation (odds ratio, 3.13), American Association for the Surgery of Trauma Organ Injury Scale grade2 (odds ratio, 2.62), and resection and diversion (odds ratio, 4.47).Esophageal injuries carry a high morbidity and mortality. Increased esophageal related morbidity occurs with the diagnostic workup and its inherent delay in operative repair of these injuries. For centers practicing selective management of penetrating neck injuries and transmediastinal gunshot wounds, rapid diagnosis and definitive repair should be made a high priority.

Angiographic embolization (AE) has been used extensively for bleeding control after injuries to the face and neck. Its role in abdominal trauma requires further exploration. We reviewed the medical records of 137 consecutive patients who underwent angiography with the intent to embolize bleeding sites within the abdomen. Of them, 97 (71%) had blunt and 40 (29%) had penetrating trauma. AE was performed for hemorrhage associated with pelvic fractures (97 patients), liver lacerations (n = 26), renal lacerations (n = 12), splenic lacerations (n = 5), other injuries (n = 9), and multiple injuries (n = 12). On angiography, 102 patients were found to have bleeding sites and underwent AE, with angiographic and clinical bleeding control in 93 (91%). The rate of successful hemostasis by AE was identical in blunt and penetrating trauma patients. There was no major morbidity after AE. No factors predicted patients with a high likelihood to have a positive angiogram. Patients who had AE before or after a period of attempted hemodynamic stabilization in the intensive care unit were no different with respect to hemodynamic parameters immediately before AE or effectiveness of AE for bleeding control. AE is a safe and effective method for controlling bleeding after blunt and penetrating intra- and retroperitoneal injuries. Early AE may be used in selected patients as a front-line therapeutic intervention that offers expeditious hemostasis and prevents delays in definitive bleeding control.

To evaluate the effect of varying durations of antibiotic prophylaxis in trauma patients with multiple risk factors for postoperative septic complications, a prospective randomized trial was undertaken at an urban level I trauma center. The inclusion criteria were full-thickness colon injury and one of the following: (1) Penetrating Abdominal Trauma Index ≥25, (2) transfusion of 6 units or more of packed red blood cells, or (3) more than 4 hours from injury to operation. Patients were randomly assigned to a short course (24 hours) or a long course (5 days) of antibiotic therapy. All patients received 2 g cefoxitin en route to the operating room and 2 g intravenously piggyback every 6 hours for a total of 1 day vs. 5 days. Sixty-three patients were equally divided into short-course (n = 31) and long-course (n = 32) therapy. This was a high-risk patient population, as assessed by the mean Penetrating Abdominal Trauma Index (33), number of patients with multiple blood transfusions (51 of 63; 81%), number of patients with an Injury Severity Score greater than 15 (37 of 63; 59%), number of patients with destructive colon wounds requiring resection (27 of 63; 43%), and number of patients requiring postoperative critical care (37 of 63; 59%). Differences in intra-abdominal (1-day, 19%; 5-days, 38%) and extra-abdominal (1-day, 45%; 5-days, 25%) infection rates did not achieve statistical significance. There continues to be no evidence that extending antibiotic prophylaxis beyond 24 hours is of benefit, even among the highest risk patients with penetrating abdominal trauma. A large, multi-institutional trial will be necessary to condemn this common practice with statistical validity.

Background: Complex hepatic injuries American Association for the Surgery of Trauma Organ Injury Scale grades IV and V incur high mortality rate ranging from 40 to 80%, respectively. The objective of this study is to assess the clinical experience with an aggressive approach to the management of these, the most complex of hepatic injuries. Methods: This is a retrospective 6-year study (1992-1997) at an American College of Surgeons urban Level I trauma center of patients sustaining complex hepatic injuries whose interventions included surgery, angiographic embolization, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography plus biliary stenting and percutaneous computed tomographic-guided drainage. The main outcome measure was survival. Results: A total of 22 patients sustaining complex hepatic injuries; mean age of 26 years (range, 10-52 years), mean Revised Trauma Scale score of 9.9, mean Injury Severity Score of 32 (range, 16-75), American Association for the Surgery of Trauma - Organ Injury Scale grade IV (13 cases); grade V (9 cases). Mean estimated blood loss was 4,600 mL; mean number of units of blood transfused was 15. The patients underwent the following interventions: surgery (n = 22), re-operated (n = 13), mean number of operations 1.6 (range, 1-4), extensive hepatotomy and hepatorrhaphy (n = 17), nonanatomic resection (n = 7), formal hepatectomy (n = 4), packing (n = 10), direct approach to hepatic veins (n = 3); angiographic embolization (n = 15); endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and stenting (n = 5); computed tomographic guided drainage (n = 6). Mean length of stay in the intensive care unit was 21 days (range, 2-134 days), mean hospital length of stay was 40 days (range, 2-147 days). Overall mortality rate was 14% (3 of 22 cases), hepatic mortality rate was 9% (2 of 22 cases), mortality rate by injury grade was 8% grade IV (1 of 13 cases) and 22% grade V (2 of 9 cases). Conclusion: In this select patient population, improvements in mortality rates can be achieved with an aggressive approach to the management of complex hepatic injuries, including surgery, early packing, angiographic embolization, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and stenting of biliary leaks, and drainage of hepatic abscesses.