Search

Background: Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is standard care for patients with inoperable early-stage non-small cell lung cancer. However, clinicians may hesitate to use SBRT in patients with severe COPD because of potential negative effects on pulmonary function. We quantitatively analyzed long-term declines in pulmonary function after SBRT to ascertain lifelong tolerability to SBRT.Methods: Between 2005 and 2010 at Ofuna Chuo Hospital, 292 patients with lung tumors were treated with SBRT. Among them, patients who underwent pulmonary function tests (PFTs) both pretreatment and at ≥1 year after SBRT were evaluated in this retrospective analysis. The decline ratio in FEV(1) and FVC was assessed (ie, ΔFEV(1)/preFEV(1) and ΔFVC/preFVC). Predictors were identified using univariate and multivariate analyses.Results: The 141 eligible patients had follow-up PFTs at a median of 21.0 (range, 12.0-74.8) months after SBRT. Among groups with normal function, or mild to moderate or severe COPD, the median values for ΔFEV(1)/preFEV(1) were 7.9%, 7.9%, and 7.4%, respectively, and for ΔFVC/preFVC, 5.1%, 3.4%, and 0.5%, respectively. Low BMI was the only predictor for ΔFEV(1)/preFEV(1)> 10%. Low BMI, high lung volume receiving 20 Gy, and high pretreatment FVC were predictors for ΔFVC/preFVC > 10%.Conclusions: Declines in FEV(1) and FVC were small, but statistically significant in patients with normal function or mild to moderate COPD, but nonsignificant in patients with severe COPD. These declines were primarily due to physiologic aging. SBRT had a limited effect on decline in long-term pulmonary function and may be an acceptable alternative to surgery for patients with comorbid lung cancer and COPD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To report final results of a prospective study of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in patients with previously untreated solitary primary hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)., Methods and Materials: This prospective, single-arm, multicenter phase 2 trial recruited patients with HCC who were unsuitable for, or refused, surgery and radiofrequency ablation, with 3-year overall survival rates as the primary endpoint and survival outcomes and adverse events as secondary endpoints. The prescribed SBRT dose was 40 Gy in 5 fractions. The final data were analyzed in November 2022., Results: Between 2014 and 2018, 36 patients (median age, 73.5 years) were registered; enrollment was closed before full recruitment due to slow accrual. Overall, 34 patients were analyzed for efficacy evaluation after excluding 2 patients. The median tumor size was 2.3 cm. The median follow-up times for all patients and for survivors were 49 and 56 months, respectively. The 3-year overall survival rate was 82% (95% confidence interval, 65%-92%). The 3-year local control rate was 93% (95% confidence interval, 76%-98%). Grade 3 or higher SBRT-related nonlaboratory toxicities were observed in 4 patients (11%). No grade 5 adverse events were observed., Conclusions: Final results of this phase 2 trial suggest the efficacy and safety of SBRT for newly diagnosed early-stage HCC that is unfit for other local therapies. Although this study was underpowered by the small number of registrations, the excellent results indicate that SBRT may be an alternative option for the management of early-stage HCC., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Whole-prostate dose escalation in stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for localized prostate cancer (PCa) can improve oncological outcomes, albeit at the cost of increased toxicity. A focal boost to the dominant intraprostatic lesion (DIL) is gaining interest as an alternative approach. Herein, we investigate the safety and efficacy of this approach., Methods: This retrospective study enrolled patients with localized PCa who underwent five-fraction SBRT with a focal boost to the DIL at our institution between May 2016 and August 2021. The prescription doses to the whole prostate were 35 and 36.25 Gy for low- to favorable intermediate-risk PCa and unfavorable intermediate- to high-risk PCa, respectively. The focal boost to the DIL was up to 115-140% of the prescribed dose. None of the patients underwent pretreatment fiducial or perirectal hydrogel spacer placement. Acute and late genitourinary (GU) and gastrointestinal (GI) toxicities and oncological outcomes were assessed., Results: Among the 520 patients, 44% were categorized as patients with high-risk PCa. The median follow-up period was 42.9 months. No acute or late grade ≥3 toxicities were observed. Acute and late grade 2 GU toxicities were observed in 22.3 and 6.1%, respectively, while GI toxicities were observed in 2.1 and 0.8% of the patients. The 4‑year relapse-free survival rate was 94.8% among all patients., Conclusion: Our results indicate that SBRT with a focal boost without fiducials or perirectal hydrogel spacer for localized PCa has a promising toxicity profile and oncological outcomes. Longer follow-up studies are necessary to adequately evaluate late toxicities and efficacy., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: Y. Tsurugai, A. Takeda, N. Sanuki, Y. Aoki, Y. Kimura, Y. Oku, T. Eriguchi, H. Yamanaka, M. Machida, T. Matsushita, and S. Saito declare that they have no competing interests., (© 2024. Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

The Breast Cancer Clinical Practice Guidelines, organized by the Japanese Breast Cancer Society (JBCS), were published in 2022. We present the English version of the Radiation Therapy (RT) section of the guidelines. The JBCS formed a task force to update the 2018 version of the JBCS Clinical Practice Guidelines. The Background Questions (BQs) contain the standard treatments for breast cancer in clinical practice, whereas the Clinical Questions (CQs) address daily clinical questions that remain controversial. Future Research Questions (FRQs) explore the subjects that are considered important issues, despite there being insufficient data for inclusion as CQs. The task force selected the 12 BQs, 8 CQs, and 6 FRQs for the RT section. For each CQ, systematic literature reviews and meta-analyses were conducted according to the Minds Manual for Guideline Development 2020, version 3.0. The recommendations, strength of recommendation, and strength of evidence for each CQ were determined based on systematic reviews and meta-analyses, and finalized by voting at the recommendation decision meeting., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

This is a prognostic report by the Japanese Breast Cancer Society on breast cancer extracted from the National Clinical Database-Breast Cancer Registry of Japan. Here, we present a summary of 457,878 breast cancer cases registered between 2004 and 2016. The median follow-up duration was 5.6 years. The median age at the start of treatment was 59 years (5-95%: 38-82 years) and increased from 57 years between 2004 and 2008 to 60 years between 2013 and 2016. The proportion of patients with Stage 0-II disease increased from 74.5% to 78.3%. The number of cases with estrogen and progesterone receptor positivity increased from 74.8% to 77.9% and 60.5% to 68.1%, respectively. Regarding (neo-)adjuvant chemotherapy, the taxane (T) or taxane-cyclophosphamide (C) regimen increased by 2.4% to 8.2%, but the (fluorouracil (F)) adriamycin (A)-C-T/(F) epirubicin (E)C-T and (F)AC/(F)EC regimens decreased by 18.6% to 15.2% and 13.5% to 5.0%, respectively. Regarding (neo-)adjuvant anti-human epidermal growth factor-2 (HER2)-targeted therapy, the use of trastuzumab increased from 4.6% to 10.5%. The rate of sentinel lymph node biopsy increased from 37.1% to 60.7%, while that of axillary dissection decreased from 54.5% to 22.6%. Improvements in disease-free and overall survival were observed in patients with HER2-positive breast cancer, but there was no apparent trend in patients with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative, or triple-negative breast cancers., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to The Japanese Breast Cancer Society.)

The Japanese Breast Cancer Society initiated the breast cancer registry in 1975, which transitioned to the National Clinical Database-Breast Cancer Registry in 2012. This annual report presents data from 2020 and analyzes the ten-year mortality rates for those aged 65 and older. We analyzed data from 93,784 breast cancer (BC) cases registered in 2020 and assessed 10-year mortality rates for 36,279 elderly patients diagnosed between 2008 and 2012. In 2020, 99.4% of BC cases were females with a median age of 61. Most (65%) were diagnosed at early stages (Stage 0 or I). Breast-conserving surgery rates varied with stages: 58.5% at cStage I, 30.8% at cStage II, and 13.1% at cStage III. Sentinel lymph node biopsy was done in 73.6% of cases, followed by radiotherapy in 70% of those post-conserving surgery and chemotherapy in 21.1% post-surgery. Pathology showed that 63.4% had tumors under 2.0 cm, 11.7% had pTis tumors, and 77.3% had no axillary lymph node metastasis. ER positivity was seen in 75.1%, HER2 in 14.3%, and 30% had a Ki67 positivity rate above 30%. Across all stages and subtypes, there was a trend where the 10-year mortality rates increased for individuals older than 65 years. In Stage I, many deaths were not directly linked to BC and, for those with HER2-type and triple-negative BC, breast cancer-related deaths increased with age. Within Stage II, patients older than 70 years with luminal-type BC often experienced deaths not directly linked to BC, whereas patients below 80 years with HER2-type and triple-negative BC, likely had breast cancer-related deaths. In Stage III, breast cancer-related deaths were more common, particularly in HER2 and triple-negative BC. Our prognostic analysis underscores distinct mortality patterns by stage, subtype, and age in elderly BC patients. It highlights the importance of personalized treatment strategies, considering subtype-specific aggressiveness, age-related factors, and comorbidities., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to The Japanese Breast Cancer Society.)

This is an annual report by the Japanese Breast Cancer Society regarding the clinical data on breast cancer extracted from the National Clinical Database-Breast Cancer Registry (NCD-BCR) of Japan. Here, we present an updated summary of 98,300 breast cancer cases registered in 2019. The median age at cancer diagnosis was 61 years (interquartile range 49-72 years), and 30.6% of the breast cancer patients were premenopausal. Of the 93,840 patients without distant metastases, 14,118 (15.0%) and 42,047 (44.8%) were diagnosed with stage 0 and I disease, respectively. Breast-conserving surgery was performed in 42,080 (44.8%) patients. Regarding axillary procedures, 62,677 (66.8%) and 7371 (7.9%) patients underwent sentinel node biopsy and axillary node dissection after biopsy, respectively. Whole breast irradiation was administered to 29,795 (70.8%) of the 42,080 patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery. Chest wall irradiation was administered to 5524 (11.1%) of the 49,637 patients who underwent mastectomy. Of the 6912 clinically lymph node-negative patients who received preoperative therapy, 5250 (76.0%) and 427 (6.2%) underwent sentinel node biopsy and axillary node dissection after biopsy, respectively; however, 602 (8.7%) patients initially underwent axillary node dissection without biopsy., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to The Japanese Breast Cancer Society.)

Purpose: Local control (LC) is an important outcome of local cancer therapy, besides overall survival (OS). We conducted a comprehensive literature search to investigate whether a high LC rate contributes to good OS in radiotherapy for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (ES-NSCLC)., Materials and Methods: Studies in patients receiving radiotherapy for peripheral ES-NSCLC, mainly staged as T1-2N0M0 were included for a systematic review. Relevant information was collected including, dose fractionation, T stage, median age, 3-year LC, cancer-specific survival (CSS), disease-free survival (DFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and OS. Correlations between outcomes and clinical variables were evaluated., Results: After screening, 101 data points from 87 studies including 13,435 patients were selected for the quantitative synthesis. Univariate meta-regression analysis revealed that the coefficients between the 3-year LC and 3-year DFS, DMFS, CSS, and OS were 0.753 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.307-1.199; p < 0.001), 0.360 (95% CI: 0.128-0.593; p = 0.002), 0.766 (95% CI: 0.489-1.044; p < 0.001), and 0.574 (95% CI: 0.275-0.822; p < 0.001), respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that the 3-year LC (coefficient, 0.561; 95% CI: 0.254-0.830; p < 0.001) and T1 proportion (coefficient, 0.207; 95% CI: 0.030-0.385; p = 0.012) were significantly associated with the 3-year OS and CSS (coefficient for 3-year LC, 0.720; 95% CI: 0.468-0.972; p < 0.001 and T1 proportion, 0.002; 95% CI: 0.000-0.003; p = 0.012). Toxicities ≥ grade 3 were low (3.4%)., Conclusions: Three-year LC was correlated with three-year OS in patients receiving radiotherapy for ES-NSCLC. A 5% increase in 3-year LC is expected to improve the 3-year CSS and OS rates by 3.8% and 2.8%, respectively., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

A 54-year-old man was diagnosed with descending colon cancer with metastases in the liver, para-aortic lymph nodes, and penis, and chemotherapy was introduced after construction of a colostomy. The patient reported only mild penile pain at the time of diagnosis; however, the pain gradually worsened and interfered with his daily life. Opioids did not provide sufficient analgesia, and the patient developed dysuria and priapism. Through construction of a cystostomy, palliative radiotherapy with QUAD Shot regimen (14 Gy in 4 fractions twice-daily on 2 days repeated every 4 weeks) to the penile metastasis was started for pain relief and tumor shrinkage. The radiation rapidly improved the penile symptoms, enabling opioid reduction and cystostomy removal. The patient remained pain-free and able to urinate on his own until his death. Metastatic penile tumors are rare, especially those derived from colon cancer. Penile metastases occur mainly in the late stages of cancer and may impair the patient's quality of life. In such cases, palliative radiotherapy, especially with QUAD Shot regimen, is useful with short treatment time, durable symptom control, and little adverse effect, maintaining quality of life., Competing Interests: Conflict of interestAll authors declare that they have no conflict of financial interest., (© The Author(s) under exclusive licence to The Japan Society of Clinical Oncology 2023, Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.)

Background: This study investigated whether the dose distribution of lung cancer can be improved by dynamic arc conformal radiotherapy (dynamic CRT) compared with static multiple-beam radiotherapy (static CRT)., Materials and Methods: A dummy study of static CRT and dynamic CRT was performed, designed to meet the predetermined dose constraints. A dose of 60 Gy in 30 fractions was administered using two dose prescription methods: dose prescribed to the isocenter (IC prescription), and dose prescribed to > 50% of the planning target volume (D50 prescription). Dose-volume parameters were compared between the plans., Results: Among 20 patients with locally advanced lung cancer, dose conformity was significantly better with dynamic CRT than static CRT (median conformity index: 1.3 vs . 2.2; p < 0.01). As for the lung dose, compared with static CRT, dynamic CRT did not increase the percentage lung volume receiving ≥ 20 Gy (18.9% vs. 19.3%, p = 0.09). The maximum spinal cord dose was significantly reduced by dynamic CRT (static vs. dynamic CRT: 44.1 vs. 25.2 Gy, p < 0.001). With the change from IC to D50 prescription, the 95% isodose volume increased by 18.3 cc in static CRT and by 4.1 cc in dynamic CRT, while doses to the lung and spinal cord remained within the acceptable ranges., Conclusion: The dynamic CRT technique showed better target coverage and lower doses to the spinal cord in exchange for increased low-dose lung area, compared with static CRT. Dynamic CRT with D50 prescription instead of prescription to the isocenter has excellent dose distribution profiles without compromising doses to organs at risk for lung cancer at favorable locations., Competing Interests: Conflict of interests There are no conflicts of interest., (© 2022 Greater Poland Cancer Centre.)

In the treatment of colorectal cancer patients with distant metastases, the development of new anticancer agents has considerably prolonged progression-free survival. Such survival benefits attributed to chemotherapy have increased the relative significance of local therapy in patients with limited metastases. The liver is recognized as the most common site of metastasis of colorectal cancer because of the intestinal mesenteric drainage to the portal veins. Hepatic resection of isolated liver metastases of colorectal cancer is the only option for a potential cure. However, hepatic metastases are resectable in only approximately 20% of the patients. For remaining patients with high-risk resectable liver metastases or those who are unfit for surgery, less invasive, local therapies including radiation therapy (stereotactic body radiation therapy, SBRT) may have a potential role in treatment. Although the local control rate of SBRT for colorectal liver metastases has room for improvement, its less-invasive nature and broad indications deserve consideration. Future research should include SBRT dose escalation or the selection of patients who benefit from local ablative therapies. SBRT may offer an alternative, non-invasive approach for the treatment of colorectal liver metastases in a multidisciplinary treatment strategy., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Variations in dose prescription methods in stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for early stage non-small-cell lung cancer (ES-NSCLC) make it difficult to properly compare the outcomes of published studies. We conducted a comprehensive search of the published literature to summarize the outcomes by discerning the relationship between local control (LC) and dose prescription sites. We systematically searched PubMed to identify observational studies reporting LC after SBRT for peripheral ES-NSCLC. The correlations between LC and four types of biologically effective doses (BED) were evaluated, which were calculated from nominal, central, and peripheral prescription points and, from those, the average BED. To evaluate information on SBRT for peripheral ES-NSCLC, 188 studies were analyzed. The number of relevant articles increased over time. The use of an inhomogeneity correction was mentioned in less than half of the articles, even among the most recent. To evaluate the relationship between the four BEDs and LC, 33 studies were analyzed. Univariate meta-regression revealed that only the central BED significantly correlated with the 3-year LC of SBRT for ES-NSCLC ( p = 0.03). As a limitation, tumor volume, which might affect the results of this study, could not be considered due to a lack of data. In conclusion, the central dose prescription is appropriate for evaluating the correlation between the dose and LC of SBRT for ES-NSCLC. The standardization of SBRT dose prescriptions is desirable.

Purpose: Clear evidence indicating whether surgery or stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is best for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is lacking. SBRT has many advantages. We used artificial neural networks (NNs) to predict treatment outcomes for patients with NSCLC receiving SBRT, aiming to aid in decision making., Patients and Methods: Among consecutive patients receiving SBRT between 2005 and 2019 in our institution, we retrospectively identified those with Tis-T4N0M0 NSCLC. We constructed two NNs for prediction of overall survival (OS) and cancer progression in the first 5 years after SBRT, which were tested using an internal and an external test data set. We performed risk group stratification, wherein 5-year OS and cancer progression were stratified into three groups., Results: In total, 692 patients in our institution and 100 patients randomly chosen in the external institution were enrolled. The NNs resulted in concordance indexes for OS of 0.76 (95% CI, 0.73 to 0.79), 0.68 (95% CI, 0.60 to 0.75), and 0.69 (95% CI, 0.61 to 0.76) and area under the curve for cancer progression of 0.80 (95% CI, 0.75 to 0.84), 0.72 (95% CI, 0.60 to 0.83), and 0.70 (95% CI, 0.57 to 0.81) in the training, internal test, and external test data sets, respectively. The survival and cumulative incidence curves were significantly stratified. NNs selected low-risk cancer progression groups of 5.6%, 6.9%, and 7.0% in the training, internal test, and external test data sets, respectively, suggesting that 48% of patients with peripheral Tis-4N0M0 NSCLC can be at low-risk for cancer progression., Conclusion: Predictions of SBRT outcomes using NNs were useful for Tis-4N0M0 NSCLC. Our results are anticipated to open new avenues for NN predictions and provide decision-making guidance for patients and physicians., Competing Interests: Atsuya TakedaConsulting or Advisory Role: Accuray Japan K.K.Research Funding: Varian Medical Systems Yukinori MatsuoResearch Funding: Varian Medical SystemsNo other potential conflicts of interest were reported.

Background Malignant lumbosacral plexopathy is caused by a direct extension of an intrapelvic malignancy to involve the plexus nerves. In this report, we describe the effect of radiotherapy on patients with malignant lumbosacral plexopathy. Patients and methods We performed a retrospective review of the medical records of patients who underwent radiation therapy for pain caused by malignant lumbosacral plexopathy between 2017 and 2020 at our institution. The pain was measured using a numeric rating scale (0-10) at initiation and completion of radiotherapy or at the time when the maximum response was observed. Results A total of 12 tumor sites in 11 patients were included. Eight of the tumors invaded the iliopsoas muscle, and the remaining four invaded or abutted the piriformis muscle. The mean duration of follow-up was 215 days (31-675 days). All patients achieved pain relief at the end of radiotherapy, with complete resolution of pain in nine patients. The maximum effect was seen at a mean of three weeks (1-12 weeks) after the initiation of radiotherapy. Toxicities related to radiotherapy included grade 1 diarrhea in four patients and grade 1 frequent urination in one patient. Two patients experienced a relapse of pain at one and two months, respectively, after achieving their maximal response. Conclusion Radiotherapy provides significant pain relief for patients with the malignant lumbosacral syndrome. The recognition and diagnosis of this syndrome, and the use of radiation therapy as a therapeutic option, are important. Patients should be offered all possible therapies, regardless of curative or palliative intent., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist., (Copyright © 2022, Sanuki et al.)

In clinical practice, the treatment approach for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with macrovascular invasion (MVI) is determined on a case-by-case basis. The common management options include systemic and local therapies, although the former is the more widely accepted approach. We present three cases of HCC with MVI successfully treated with radiotherapy. The first patient was a 62-year-old man with Child-Pugh A cirrhosis who had a 5.7-cm treatment-naïve HCC invading the bilateral branches of the portal vein. Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) was administered, with no evidence of recurrence observed at the 24-month follow-up. The second patient was an 81-year-old man with Child-Pugh A cirrhosis who had a 3.8-cm HCC invading the inferior vena cava (IVC). Transcatheter chemoembolization performed one month earlier had been ineffective, and the tumor had grown rapidly. SBRT was administered, and no evidence of recurrence was observed up to his death from pneumonia 24 months after the treatment initiation. The third patient was a 72-year-old man with Child-Pugh A cirrhosis who had a 6.7-cm treatment-naïve HCC with portal vein tumor thrombosis (PVTT) from the main trunk to the secondary branches of both lobes. PVTT was treated with hypofractionated radiotherapy, while the primary HCC and intrahepatic recurrent lesions were subsequently treated with hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) and five rounds of ablation. Six months after the last ablation (48 months after initial therapy), no evidence of recurrence was observed. Our cases illustrate that radiotherapy leads to the successful treatment of HCC with MVI., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist., (Copyright © 2021, Tsurugai et al.)

Purpose: We investigated whether delivery of a high biologically effective dose (BED) to primary tumors affects systemic outcomes of cancer-specific death (CSD) and overall survival (OS) rates after stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in patients with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (ES-NSCLC)., Methods and Materials: Among consecutive ES-NSCLC patients treated with SBRT between 2005 and 2019, we retrospectively identified patients who received a prescription of 50 to 60 Gy in 5 fractions with maximum doses of 62.5 to 100 Gy. Patients were categorized by maximum BED within the planning target volume with a threshold dose of 200 Gy. Outcomes were analyzed in all and matched patients., Results: Overall, 433 patients were eligible, and 262 and 171 patients were categorized into HighBED and LowBED groups, respectively. After propensity score matching, pairs of 154 patients were selected. Median follow-up times for the HighBED and LowBED groups were 52.3 months (range, 0.8-107.2 months) and 121.6 months (range, 3.0-162.8 months), respectively. The local recurrence rate in the HighBED group was significantly lower than that in the LowBED group (5-year rate, 1.3% and 7.2%; hazard ratio [HR], 0.15; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.03-0.65; P = .011). Rates of any recurrence and CSD in the HighBED group were significantly lower (5-year any recurrence: 18.1% and 32.1%; HR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.33-0.83; P = .0058; 5-year CSD: 9.5% and 21.8%; HR, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.20-0.70; P = .002), and OS in the HighBED group was significantly better compared with the LowBED group (5-year rate: 61.7% and 51.8%; HR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.50-1.00; P = .047)., Conclusion: In patients with peripheral ES-NSCLC, SBRT with a high maximum dose may improve not only local control, but also any recurrence, CSD, and OS rates without increased toxicity. Further trials designed to evaluate whether higher intensity SBRT increases local control rates and contributes to improved CSD and OS outcomes are anticipated., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Aim: Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is an emerging treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and has shown excellent local control (LC), as has radiofrequency ablation (RFA). As no randomized controlled trial has compared SBRT and RFA for HCC, data from a propensity score matched study (PSMS) are valuable. However, the results varied greatly and depended on composing factors of Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer staging (BCLC-factors) adjusted. Therefore, we undertook a systematic review and meta-analyses of the studies focusing on BCLC-factors matching., Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, the Cochrane database, EMBASE, and Web of Science to identify studies comparing RFA and SBRT using propensity scores. The hazard ratios (HRs) of overall survival (OS) and LC from BCLC-factor-matched and -unmatched PSMS were pooled. Heterogeneity between the data from these studies was assessed., Results: Three BCLC-factor-matched studies were identified. Stereotactic body radiotherapy led to comparable OS (HR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.74-1.08; p = 0.24; I 2  = 0%; p for heterogeneity, 0.56) and significantly better LC (HR, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.30-0.51; p < 0.001; I 2  = 0%; p for heterogeneity, 0.67). We also identified three additional BCLC-factor-unmatched studies (HR of OS, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.21-1.65; p < 0.0001; I 2  = 0%; p for heterogeneity, 0.63). However, considerable heterogeneity was observed for HR of OS between BCLC-factor-matched and -unmatched studies (I 2  = 92.6%; p for heterogeneity, 0.0002)., Conclusions: When BCLC-factors were properly adjusted, the results of the meta-analysis revealed equivalent OS and better LC for SBRT compared with RFA. Stereotactic body radiotherapy could be an alternative treatment option for HCC., (© 2021 The Japan Society of Hepatology.)

Aim: To prospectively evaluate the efficacy and safety of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for patients with previously untreated solitary primary hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)., Methods: The main eligibility criteria included the following: (1) primary solitary HCC; (2) no prior treatment for HCC; (3) Child-Turcotte-Pugh score of seven or less; and (4) unsuitability for or refusal of surgery and radiofrequency ablation (RFA). The prescribed dose of SBRT was 40 Gy in five fractions. The primary endpoint was 3-year overall survival (OS); the secondary endpoints included local progression-free survival (LPFS), local control (LC), and adverse events. The accrual target was 60 patients, expecting a 3-year OS of 70% with a 50% threshold., Results: Between 2014 and 2018, 36 patients were enrolled; enrollment was closed early because of slow accrual. The median tumor size was 2.3 cm. The median follow-up at the time of evaluation was 20.8 months. The 3-year OS was 78% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 53%-90%). The 3-year LPFS and LC proportion were 73% (95% CI: 48%-87%) and 90% (95% CI: 65%-97%), respectively. Grade 3 or higher SBRT-related toxicities were observed in four patients (11%), and grade five toxicities were not observed., Conclusions: This study showed acceptably low incidence of SBRT-related toxicities. LC and OS after SBRT were comparable for previously untreated solitary HCC for patients unfit for resection and RFA. Although a definitive conclusion cannot be drawn by this study, the promising results indicate that SBRT may be an alternative option in the management of early HCC., (© 2020 The Japan Society of Hepatology.)

Aim: Decisions regarding therapeutic plans for inoperable patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) adjacent to the gastrointestinal (GI) tract are challenging because radiofrequency ablation has the potential risk of thermal injury. Moreover, the response rate of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization is relatively low and stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is believed to be too toxic. We have applied hypofractionated radiotherapy (HFRT) for such lesions. This study investigated the outcomes and toxicities of this treatment., Methods: Among consecutive HCC patients treated with radiotherapy with curative intent at our institution between 2015 and 2019, we retrospectively extracted those outside of the indication for SBRT due to exceeding the constraint of the GI tract and who were treated using HFRT with a prescription dose of 42 Gy in 14 fractions and prophylactic proton pump inhibitor administration for 6 months. The oncological outcomes and toxicities were investigated., Results: A total of 66 patients with 73 lesions were eligible. The median follow-up period was 24.0 months. The local recurrence, intrahepatic recurrence, liver-related death, and overall survival rates at 2 years were 11.3%, 50.6%, 15.9%, and 60.4%, respectively. Six (9.1%) patients experienced Child-Pugh score deterioration ≥2 within 6 months following treatment. Two and one patient developed grades 2 and 3 gastroduodenal bleeding, respectively., Conclusions: HFRT can achieve good local control in patients with HCC adjacent to the GI tract, with low GI toxicity incidence. Our study demonstrated that HFRT can be a potentially curative treatment option for lesions., (© 2021 The Japan Society of Hepatology.)

Purpose: The Japanese Breast Cancer Society (JBCS) Clinical Practice Guideline was revised in 2018. This article describes the revise points in the section on radiation therapy (RT)., Methods and Materials: The JBCS formed task force to update the JBCS Clinical Practice Guideline 2015 edition. Background questions (BQs) deal with standard treatments of breast cancer in clinical practice. Clinical questions (CQs) highlight the important treatments in which controversy remains. The task force for RT section addressed the 10 BQs, the 10 CQs, and the 4 Future reseach questions (FQs). For each CQ, systematic literature reviews and meta-analyses were conducted, and recommendations, strength of recommendation and strength of evidence were determined according to the protocol in Morizane et al. (Minds Handbook for Clinical Practice Guideline Development, 2014)., Results: The recommendations, the strength of recommendation and the strength of evidence were determined based on the systematic literature reviews and the meta-analyses for each CQ., Conclusion: The JBCS updated the Clinical Practice Guideline. RT represents a significant portion of the breast cancer treatment, and these recommendations regarding RT will be useful in individualized, shared decision making between physicians and patients.

The evidence for stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is meagre for patients with clinical T3-4N0M0 non-small cell lung cancer (8th Edition of the Union for International Cancer Control (UICC)). This study retrospectively investigated clinical outcomes following SBRT for such patients. Among consecutive patients treated with SBRT, patients staged as cT3-4N0M0 by all criteria were examined, most of whom were unsuitable to chemoradiotherapy due to their fragile characters. Clinical outcomes were evaluated and factors associated with outcomes were investigated. Between 2005 and 2017, 70 eligible patients (T3: 58, T4: 12; median age 81 (63-93) years) were identified. Median follow-up duration was 28.6 (1.0-142.5) months. No adjuvant chemotherapy was administered. The 3-year local recurrence rates were 15.8% and 16.7% in T3 and T4 patients, respectively, and they were significantly lower in the high-dose group (3.1% vs 28.6%, P < 0.01). Multivariate analyses showed that the dose-volumetric factor was the significant factor for local recurrence. The 3-year regional and distant metastasis rates, cancer-specific mortality, and overall survival in T3 and T4 patients were 22.7% and 25.0%, 26.5% and 33.3%, 32.2% and 41.7%, and 39.5% and 41.7%, respectively. Only age was correlated with overall survival. Radiation pneumonitis ≥grade 3 and fatal hemoptysis occurred in 3 and 1 patients, respectively. SBRT for cT3-4N0M0 lung cancer patients achieved good local control. Survival was rather good considering that patients were usually frail, staged with clinical staging, and were not given adjuvant chemotherapy, and it may be comparable to surgery. To validate these outcomes following SBRT, a prospective study is warranted., (© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Japan Radiation Research Society and Japanese Society for Radiation Oncology.)

Background: Currently, there is some controversy regarding indications for stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for lung cancer patients. We investigated the treatment preferences of patients with experience of both surgery and SBRT using a questionnaire survey., Methods: Of lung cancer patients treated with SBRT between 2005 and 2017, we identified those who also previously underwent surgery for lung cancer. These patients were asked about their experiences of surgery and SBRT including perceived condition, distress, stress, convenience, adverse effects, and satisfaction during and after treatment. Participants were also asked about treatment decision-making for hypothetical scenarios., Results: Of 653 lung cancer patients treated with SBRT, 149 also underwent surgery for lung cancer, 52 of whom participated in this questionnaire. The median age at the time of this survey was 76 years (range, 59-91 years). Significantly more participants had a favorable impression of SBRT during and after treatment (all question items; P<0.01). In terms of overall satisfaction, 27 patients preferred SBRT and three patients preferred surgery. In a hypothetical scenario (equivalent treatment outcomes) aged 70 years and faced with decision-making for first-time lung cancer treatment, significantly more patients selected SBRT (P<0.01): 38 patients selected SBRT. In a scenario with 20% better survivals for surgical resection, 14 patients selected SBRT, 12 selected surgery, and 26 were indecisive (P=0.47). In a scenario at age 80 years, significantly more patients selected SBRT (P<0.01)., Conclusions: Most patients with experience of both surgery and SBRT for lung cancer prefer SBRT. This information would be helpful at treatment decision-making., Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Potentially curative treatments for early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) have drawbacks and contraindications. Recently, radiotherapy has achieved good outcomes. We compared the outcomes of radiotherapy and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for early-stage HCC. Consecutive patients with ≤3 early-stage HCC lesions and tumor diameters ≤3 cm treated with RFA or radiotherapy were reviewed. RFA was the first choice for HCC unsuitable for surgery. Otherwise, stereotactic body radiotherapy in five fractions was mainly performed. For HCC adjacent to the gastrointestinal tract, radiotherapy with mild hypofractionation was performed. Propensity score matching was performed to reduce the selection bias between the RFA and radiotherapy groups. Between 2012 and 2016, a total of 231 patients with 474 tumors and 143 patients with 221 tumors were eligible and were treated with RFA and radiotherapy, respectively. In an unmatched comparison, the 3-year local recurrence rate was significantly lower for radiotherapy than for RFA (5.3%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.7-9.2; versus 12.9%, 95% CI, 9.9-16.2) (P < 0.01). A propensity score matching analysis of 106 patients in each group successfully matched the two treatment groups with regard to Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer staging, T stage, and tumor size but not the adjacency of the tumor to risk organs or first or salvage treatment. The 3-year overall survival rates for RFA and radiotherapy patients were comparable (69.1%; 95% CI, 58.2-77.7; and 70.4%; 95% CI, 58.5-79.4, respectively; P = 0.86). Conclusion: Radiotherapy has excellent local control and comparable overall survival in patients with well-compensated liver function, exhibiting advantageous characteristics and compensating for the deficiencies of other treatment modalities; radiotherapy appears to be an acceptable alternative treatment option for patients who are not candidates for RFA., (© 2019 by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.)

Introduction: Prostate carcinoma is typically diagnosed and treated, and it rarely manifests as cutaneous metastases. We herein report electron radiotherapy for the treatment of cutaneous metastases causing cellulitis, with a durable clinical response achieved., Case Presentation: A 70-year-old male patient with scrotal cutaneous metastasis of prostate carcinoma was undergoing treatment with docetaxel chemotherapy due to recurring cellulitis originating from the scrotum, and his treatment was interrupted. We administered electron radiotherapy to the scrotal cutaneous metastasis lesions, as irradiation was difficult, and obtained a good clinical effect. Subsequently, he continued chemotherapy, and the scrotal lesions remained clear and dry with no recurring cellulitis for 1 year., Conclusion: Electron radiotherapy is one of the safe and effective treatment options for controlling cutaneous metastasis of prostate carcinoma., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest., (© 2019 The Authors. IJU Case Reports published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of the Japanese Urological Association.)

Background: Clinical staging, as used for patients treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for early-stage lung cancer, inadequately accounts for pleural invasion, which is a pathologic criteria. Considering the current situation, we analyzed effects of relationships between tumors and the pleura on treatment outcomes of SBRT for early-stage lung cancer., Materials and Methods: Among consecutive patients treated with SBRT between 2006 and 2017, we retrospectively identified non-small cell lung cancer patients with primary tumor diameters ≤4 cm and N0M0. The relationships between tumors and the pleura were investigated. The effects of these findings on treatment outcomes were analyzed., Results: We identified 386 patients which met the inclusion criteria. Among these patients, 323 patients were with tumors of 0.1-3.0 cm (T1-size), and 63 patients were with tumors of 3.1-4.0 cm (T2a-size). Among patients with T1-size tumors, 120, 134, and 23 had findings of pleural contact, pleural indentation, and pleural thickening, respectively. When we divided T1-size patients into 2 groups based on pleural contact (contact- or contact+), the 3-year cause-specific mortality and overall survival in patients with T1-size & contact+ were significantly worse than those in patients with T1-size & contact- (17.6% (95% confidence interval (CI), 10.7-25.9%) vs. 6.6% (95% CI, 3.5-11.1%), p < 0.01), and 58.2% (95% CI, 47.6-67.5%) vs. 77.6% (95% CI, 70.5-83.2%), p < 0.01). Local recurrence, regional recurrence, pleural cavity recurrence, and distant metastasis were associated with worse cause-specific mortality and overall survival. On multivariate analysis, pleural contact was associated with cause-specific mortality (hazard ratio (HR), 1.96; 95% CI, 1.09-3.52; p = 0.03) and overall survival (HR, 1.59; 95% CI, 1.08-2.34; p = 0.02)., Conclusion: Pleural contact in clinical T1N0M0 lung cancer patients was associated with significantly worse survivals., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

We retrospectively investigated outcomes, including pulmonary toxicities, of stereotactic body radiation therapy using RapidArc and a risk-adapted 60% isodose plan for early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer patients. We evaluated patients staged as cT1a-2bN0M0 between 2011 and 2017 and treated with a total dose of 40-60 Gy in five fractions to the 60% isodose line of the maximum dose encompassing the planning target volume with curative intent. Comorbidities and age were rated using an age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index (AACCI). Factors associated with overall survival (OS) were investigated. A total of 237 patients with 250 lesions were eligible. The median follow-up was 28.0 months. The local recurrence rate at 3 years was 0.8%; none of the patients developed isolated local recurrence. OS, deaths from lung cancer, and deaths from intercurrent disease at 3 years were 72.7%, 8.2% and 19.1%, respectively. On multivariate analysis for correlating factors with OS, AACCI and maximal standardized uptake value on [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography remained significant. Grade ≥3 toxicities were limited to radiation pneumonitis in six (2.4%) patients (Grade 3 in four patients and Grade 5 in two patients). Among those, three patients had idiopathic interstitial pneumonia. The total dose was unrelated to the incidence of Grade ≥3 radiation pneumonitis (P = 0.69). Using the 60% isodose prescription and RapidArc, maximal local control was achieved with acceptable toxicities. Although the OS may depend on patient background, dose escalation aiming at higher local control can be beneficial for medically inoperable patients., (© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Japan Radiation Research Society and Japanese Society for Radiation Oncology.)

Background: Radiation pneumonitis is a critical pulmonary toxicity after irradiation of the lung. Macrolides including clarithromycin (CAM) are antibiotics. They also have immunomodulatory properties and are used to treat respiratory inflammatory diseases. Radiation pneumonitis has similar pathology to them. Adverse reactions to macrolides are few and self-limited. We thus administered CAM to patients with high-risk factors for radiation pneumonitis, and retrospectively investigated whether CAM mitigated radiation pneumonitis following stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT)., Methods: Among consecutive patients treated with SBRT, we retrospectively examined lung cancer patients treated with a total dose of 40-60 Gy in 5-10 fractions and followed ≥6 months. Since January 2014, CAM has been administered in patients with pretreatment predictable radiation pneumonitis high-risk factors, including idiopathic interstitial pneumonias (IIPs), and elevated Krebs von den Lungen-6 (KL-6) and/or surfactant protein D (SP-D), and in patients developing early onset radiation pneumonitis., Results: Five hundred and eighty eligible patients were identified and divided into 445 patients during the non-CAM-administration era (non-CAM-era) (before December 2013) and 136 patients during the CAM-administration era (CAM-era) (after January 2014). Median follow-up durations were 38.0 and 13.9 months, respectively. The rates of radiation pneumonitis ≥ grade 2 and ≥ grade 3 were significantly lower in CAM-era (grade ≥2, 16% vs. 9.6%, P=0.047; grade ≥3, 3.8% vs. 0.73%, P=0.037). For patients with the pretreatment predictable high-risk factors, the rate of radiation pneumonitis ≥ grade 3 was significantly lower, and that of grade ≥2 had a lower tendency (grade ≥3, 7.2% vs. 0%, P=0.011; grade ≥2, 21% vs. 9.6%, P=0.061). For patients developing early onset radiation pneumonitis, the rate of radiation pneumonitis ≥ grade 3 was also significantly lower (23% vs. 0%, P<0.05). Multivariate analysis revealed that dose-volumetric factor, the pretreatment predictable high-risk factors and non-CAM-administration era were significantly associated with or trended toward radiation pneumonitis ≥ grade 2 and ≥ grade 3., Conclusions: CAM mitigated radiation pneumonitis following SBRT. The efficacy of CAM should be confirmed in prospective studies., Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Purpose: To compare toxicity and survival after stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) between lung cancer patients with or without idiopathic interstitial pneumonias (IIPs), and to investigate the potential value of SBRT for the patients., Methods: Among lung cancer patients receiving SBRT between 2005 and 2016, we evaluated those treated with a total dose of 40-60Gy in five fractions with curative intent who either were staged as cT1-4N0M0 or experienced postoperative isolated local recurrence. We analyzed the incidence of radiation pneumonitis (RP) in all patients and local recurrence and overall survival (OS) in T1a-2a patients., Results: A total of 508 patients were eligible, including 42 with IIPs. The median follow-up was 32.3 (6.0-120.9) months. Significantly more patients with IIPs had grade ≥3RP than did those without IIPs (12% vs. 3%, p=0.009). The 2-year local recurrence rate was low in both groups (3.4% vs. 5.6%, p=0.38). The 2-year OS rate was significantly lower in the patients with IIPs (42.2% vs. 80.9%, p<0.001), although death from lung cancer was comparable (p=0.74)., Conclusion: SBRT achieved excellent local control with acceptable pulmonary toxicity in lung cancer patients with IIPs. SBRT can be a reasonable option for early lung cancer patients with IIPs., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To analyze outcomes of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for operable patients with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and to evaluate factors associated with outcomes., Methods: We retrospectively analyzed operable patients with NSCLC, staged as cT1-2N0M0, treated with SBRT between 2006 and 2015. Both biopsy-proven and clinically diagnosed NSCLC were included. Local control and survival rates were calculated and compared between subsets of patients. We investigated factors associated with outcomes., Results: We identified 88 operable patients among 661 patients with cT1-2N0M0 NSCLC. The median age was 79 years (range: 55-88). The median follow-up time after SBRT was 40 months (range: 4-121). Fifty-nine patients had been pathologically diagnosed and the other 29 had been clinically diagnosed as having NSCLC. Local control, cause-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS) at 3 years were 91%, 97% and 90% for T1, and 100%, 82% and 74% for T2, respectively. The CSS and OS at 3 years were 100% and 100% for GGO and 83% and 59% for solid tumors, respectively (p=0.005). On univariate analysis, age and T stage were significantly associated with CSS, and age, the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), and opacity were significantly associated with OS. On multivariate analysis, age and CCI were significantly associated with OS. As for toxicities, Grades 0, 1, 2 and 3 radiation pneumonitis occurred in 37.5%, 47.7%, 13.6% and 1.1% of patients, respectively. No Grade 4 or 5 radiation pneumonitis occurred, and no other toxicities of Grade 2 or above were observed., Conclusion: Outcomes of SBRT for operable early stage NSCLC were as good as previous SBRT and surgery studies. Further investigation for selecting good SBRT candidates is warranted in high-risk operable patients., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

We previously reported that the local control of pulmonary metastases from colorectal cancer (CRC) following stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) with moderate prescription dose was relatively worse. We investigated the treatment outcomes and toxicities of patients with oligometastases from CRC treated by SBRT using risk-adapted, very high- and convergent-dose regimens. Among patients referred for SBRT from August 2011 to January 2015, those patients were extracted who had liver or pulmonary metastases from CRC, and they were treated with a total dose of 50-60 Gy in five fractions prescribed to the 60% isodose line of the maximum dose covering the surface of the planning target volume. Concurrent administration of chemotherapy was not admitted during SBRT, while neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy was allowed. A total of 21 patients (12 liver, 9 lung) with 28 oligometastases were evaluated. The median follow-up duration was 27.5 months (range: 6.5-43.3 months). Four patients were treated with SBRT as a series of initial treatments, and 17 patients were treated after recurrent oligometastases. The local control rates at 1 and 2 years from the start of SBRT were 100%. The disease-free and actuarial overall survival rates were 62% and 55%, and 79% and 79%, respectively. No severe toxicities (≥grade 3) occurred during follow-up. The outcomes following high-dose SBRT were excellent. This treatment can provide an alternative to the surgical resection of oligometastases from CRC. Prospective studies are needed to validate the effectiveness of SBRT., (© The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Japan Radiation Research Society and Japanese Society for Radiation Oncology.)

Background: Curative treatment options for patients with early stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) include resection, liver transplantation, and percutaneous ablation therapy. However, even patients with solitary HCC are not always amenable to these treatments. The authors prospectively investigated the clinical outcomes of patients who received stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for solitary HCC., Methods: A phase 2 study involving SBRT and optional transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) was conducted in patients with Child-Pugh grade A or B and underlying, solitary HCC (greatest tumor dimension, ≤4 cm) who were unsuitable candidates for resection and radiofrequency ablation. The prescription dose was 35 to 40 grays in 5 fractions. The primary endpoint was 3-year local tumor control., Results: From 2007 to 2012, 101 patients were enrolled, and 90 were evaluable with a median follow-up of 41.7 months (range, 6.8-96.2 months). Thirty-two patients were treatment-naïve, 20 were treated for newly diagnosed intrahepatic failure, and 38 were treated for residual or recurrent HCC as salvage therapy. Thirty-two patients did not receive TACE, 48 received insufficient TACE, and 10 attained full lipiodol accumulation. The 3-year local control rate was 96.3%, the 3-year liver-related cause-specific survival rate was 72.5%, and the overall survival rate was 66.7%. Grade 3 laboratory abnormalities were observed in 6 patients, and 8 patients had Child-Pugh scores that worsened by 2 points., Conclusions: SBRT achieved high local control and overall survival with feasible toxicities for patients with solitary HCC, despite rather stringent conditions. SBRT can be effective against solitary HCC in treatment-naive, intrahepatic failure, residual disease, and recurrent settings, taking advantage of its distinctive characteristics. Cancer 2016;122:2041-9. © 2016 American Cancer Society., (© 2016 American Cancer Society.)

To evaluate the outcomes and feasibility of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for cT3 and cT4N0M0 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), 25 patients with localized primary NSCLC diagnosed as cT3 or cT4N0M0, given SBRT between May 2005 and July 2013, were analyzed. All patients had inoperable tumors. The major reasons for tumors being unresectable were insufficient respiratory function for curative resection, advanced age (>80 years old) or technically inoperable due to invasion into critical organs. The median patient age was 79 years (range; 60-86). The median follow-up duration was 25 months (range: 5-100 months). The 2-year overall survival rates for T3 and T4 were 57% and 69%, respectively. The 2-year local control rates for T3 and T4 were 91% and 68%, respectively. As for toxicities, Grade 0-1, Grade 2 and Grade 3 radiation pneumonitis occurred in 23, 1 and 1 patient, respectively. No other acute or symptomatic late toxicities were reported. Thirteen patients who had no local, mediastinal or intrapulmonary progression at one year after SBRT underwent pulmonary function testing. The median variation in pre-SBRT and post-SBRT forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) values was -0.1 (-0.8-0.8). This variation was not statistically significant (P = 0.56). Forced vital capacity (FVC), vital capacity (VC), %VC and %FEV1 also showed no significant differences. SBRT for cT3 and cT4N0M0 NSCLC was both effective and feasible. Considering the favorable survival and low morbidity rate, SBRT is a potential treatment option for cT3 and cT4N0M0 NSCLC., (© The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Japan Radiation Research Society and Japanese Society for Radiation Oncology.)

A major cause of death in patients undergoing long-term domiciliary oxygen therapy (LTOT) is lung cancer progression. In our institution, we actively perform stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) on patients with early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer undergoing LTOT. In this study, we retrospectively analyzed the treatment efficacy and safety of SBRT for patients with T1-3N0M0 non-small-cell lung cancer who had been prescribed LTOT for treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). A total of 24 patients were studied. Their median age was 74 years (range, 63-87 years). The median duration from the start of LTOT to SBRT was 23 months (range, 0-85 months). Four of the 24 patients underwent lobectomy due to lung cancer. The median follow-up duration was 29 months (range, 5-79 months). One patient had a local recurrence. The median survival time was 30 months. The 3-year overall survival was 49%. In 6 of the 24 patients (25%), COPD presented with interstitial pneumonia. The 3-year overall survival for patients with COPD without interstitial pneumonia was significantly better than that for patients with both COPD and interstitial pneumonia (67% and 0%, respectively; P < 0.0001). Grade 5 radiation pneumonitis occurred in one patient (4%) with COPD with interstitial pneumonia. SBRT was tolerated by patients with early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer undergoing LTOT. SBRT should be considered for patients undergoing LTOT. However, clinicians should consider the risk of severe radiation pneumonitis in patients with interstitial pneumonia., (© The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Japan Radiation Research Society and Japanese Society for Radiation Oncology.)