Search

Abstract Background Neurogenic Para-Osteo-Arthropathy (NPOA) occurs as a consequence of central nervous system injuries or some systemic conditions. They are characterized by bone formation around the main joints. Methods In order to define some biological features of NPOAs, histological and immunohistological studies of the soft tissue surrounding osteoma and Ultrasound examination (US) of NPOA before the appearance of abnormal ossification on plain radiographs were performed. Results We have observed a great number of ossifying areas scattered in soft tissues. US examination have also shown scattered ossifying areas at the early stage of ossification. A high osteogenic activity was detected in these tissues and all the stages of the endochondral process were observed. Mesenchymal cells undergo chondrocytic differentiation to further terminal maturation with hypertrophy, which sustains mineralization followed by endochondral ossification process. Conclusion We suggest that periosteoma soft tissue reflect early stage of osteoma formation and could be a model to study the mechanism of osteoma formation and we propose a mechanism of the NPOA formation in which sympathetic dystony and altered mechanical loading induce changes which could be responsible for the cascade of cellular events leading to cartilage and bone formation.

Not available.

Background: CPX-351, an encapsulated form of cytarabine and daunorubicin, has shown greater efficacy than the classic 3 + 7 treatment administration in secondary acute myeloid leukaemia. Given that higher-risk myelodysplastic syndrome and chronic myelomonocytic leukaemia share similarities with secondary acute myeloid leukaemia, we aimed to investigate the safety and efficacy of CPX-351 in this context., Methods: This investigator-initiated two-cohort phase 2 trial was conducted by the Groupe Francophone des Myélodysplasies, with 12 participating centres in France. It comprised cohort A (reported here and completed), which included patients in first-line treatment, and cohort B, which was stopped for lack of inclusion (ie, not enough patients met the inclusion criteria), for patients with hypomethylating agent failure that is not reported here. Cohort A enrolled patients with newly diagnosed higher-risk myelodysplastic syndrome or chronic myelomonocytic leukaemia (aged 18-70 years old) with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-1. Intravenous CPX-351 (100 mg/m 2 cytarabine and 44 mg/m 2 daunorubicin) was given on days 1, 3, and 5, with a second induction cycle given (same daily dose on days 1 and 3) if at least a partial response was not reached. Patients who responded could receive up to four monthly consolidation cycles (same daily dose on day 1) or allogeneic haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT). Overall response rate after one or two induction courses according to European LeukemiaNet 2017 acute myeloid leukaemia was the primary endpoint after CPX-351 induction, whether patients received one or two induction cycles. Safety was assessed in all patients enrolled (in cohort A). This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04273802., Findings: Between April 29, 2020, and Feb 10, 2021, 21 (68%) male and ten (32%) female patients were enrolled. 27 (87%) of 31 patients responded (95% CI 70-96). 16 (52%) of the 31 patients received at least one consolidation cycle. 30 (97%) of the 31 patients included were initially considered eligible for allogeneic HSCT and 29 (94%) of the 31 patients had the procedure. Median follow-up was 16·1 months (IQR 8·3-18·1). The most common grade 3-4 adverse events were pulmonary (eight [26%] of 31 patients) and cardiovascular (six [19%] of 31 patients). There were 14 serious adverse events (mainly hospitalisation for infection [n=5] and only one was treatment-related) and no treatment-related death., Interpretation: CPX-351 appears to be active and safe in patients with higher-risk myelodysplastic syndrome and chronic myelomonocytic leukaemia, allowing bridging to allogenic HSCT in most patients., Funding: Jazz Pharmaceuticals., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Hydroxyurea (HY) is a reference treatment of advanced myeloproliferative neoplasms. We conducted a randomized phase III trial comparing decitabine (DAC) and HY in advanced myeloproliferative chronic myelomonocytic leukemias (CMML)., Patients and Methods: Newly diagnosed myeloproliferative CMML patients with advanced disease were randomly assigned 1:1 to intravenous DAC (20 mg/m 2 /d days 1-5) or HY (1-4 g/d) in 28-day cycles. The primary end point was event-free survival (EFS), events being death and acute myelomonocytic leukemia (AML) transformation or progression., Results: One-hundred seventy patients received DAC (n = 84) or HY (n = 86). Median age was 72 and 74 years, and median WBC count 32.5 × 10 9 /L and 31.2 × 10 9 /L in the DAC and HY arms, respectively. Thirty-three percent of DAC and 31% of HY patients had CMML-2. Patients received a median of five DAC and six HY cycles. With a median follow-up of 17.5 months, median EFS was 12.1 months in the DAC arm and 10.3 months in the HY arm (hazard ratio [HR], 0.83; 95% CI, 0.59 to 1.16; P = .27). There was no significant interaction between treatment effect and blast or platelet count, anemia, CMML Prognostic Scoring System, Groupe Francophone des Myelodysplasies, or CMML Prognostic Scoring System-mol risk. Fifty-three (63%) DAC patients achieved a response compared with 30 (35%) HY patients ( P = .0004). Median duration of response was similar in both arms (DAC, 16.3 months; HY, 17.4 months; P = .90). Median overall survival was 18.4 months in the DAC arm and 21.9 months in the HY arm ( P = .67). Compared with HY, DAC significantly reduced the risk of CMML progression or transformation to acute myelomonocytic leukemia (cause-specific HR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.41 to 0.94; P = .005) at the expense of death without progression or transformation (cause-specific HR, 1.55; 95% CI, 0.82 to 2.9; P = .04)., Conclusion: Compared with HY, frontline treatment with DAC did not improve EFS in patients with advanced myeloproliferative CMML (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02214407)., Competing Interests: Raphael ItzyksonHonoraria: AbbVie, Astellas Pharma, Celgene/Bristol Myers Squibb, Novartis, ServierConsulting or Advisory Role: Amgen, Celgene/Bristol Myers Squibb, Daiichi Sankyo Europe GmbH, Novartis, ServierResearch Funding: Janssen (Inst), Novartis (Inst) Valeria SantiniHonoraria: Celgene/Bristol Myers Squibb, NovartisConsulting or Advisory Role: Celgene/Bristol Myers Squibb, Novartis, Menarini, Takeda, Gilead Sciences, AbbVie, Syros Pharmaceuticals, ServierResearch Funding: Celgene (Inst)Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: Janssen-Cilag, Celgene Sylvain ThepotHonoraria: Astellas Pharma, Novartis, AbbVie, BMSiTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Amgen, AbbVie Lionel AdesHonoraria: Celgene, AbbVie, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, BerGenBio, Silence Therapeutics, NovartisResearch Funding: Celgene (Inst) Aristoteles GiagounidisStock and Other Ownership Interests: Novartis, RocheHonoraria: Amgen, Novartis, Bristol Myers Squibb/CelgeneConsulting or Advisory Role: Bristol Myers Squibb/Celgene Michael LübbertConsulting or Advisory Role: Syros Pharmaceuticals, AbbVieResearch Funding: Johnson & Johnson (Inst) Ulrich GermingHonoraria: Celgene, Novartis, Jazz PharmaceuticalsConsulting or Advisory Role: CelgeneResearch Funding: Celgene (Inst), Novartis (Inst) Anna Maria PelizzariTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Janssen-Ortho Sophie ParkHonoraria: Novartis/Ipsen, Bristol Myers Squibb/CelgeneConsulting or Advisory Role: Novartis, Pfizer, Bristol Myers Squibb/CelgeneResearch Funding: Pfizer, TakedaTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Pfizer, Novartis Nadja JaekelHonoraria: Novartis Georgia MetzgerothHonoraria: Roche Pharma AG, Novartis, GlaxoSmithKlineConsulting or Advisory Role: GlaxoSmithKline Francesco OnidaTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Takeda, Kyowa Kirin International, Medac Andrea PatriarcaConsulting or Advisory Role: Sanofi, SOBISpeakers' Bureau: Novartis Italy, Incyte Aspasia StamatoullasConsulting or Advisory Role: Pfizer, JanssenTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Pfizer Katharina GötzeHonoraria: BMSConsulting or Advisory Role: BMS, AbbVie, Servier/PfizerResearch Funding: BMS Eric SolaryResearch Funding: Servier (Inst)Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: Novartis Uwe PlatzbeckerHonoraria: Celgene/Jazz, AbbVie, Curis, Geron, JanssenConsulting or Advisory Role: Celgene/Jazz, Novartis, BMS GmbH & Co. KGResearch Funding: Amgen (Inst), Janssen (Inst), Novartis (Inst), BerGenBio (Inst), Celgene (Inst), Chris (Inst)Patents, Royalties, Other Intellectual Property: part of a patent for a TFR-2 antibody (Rauner et al Nature Metabolics 2019)Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: Celgene Pierre FenauxHonoraria: CelgeneResearch Funding: Celgene (Inst)No other potential conflicts of interest were reported.

The EUROPE phase 2 trial investigated the predictive value of biomarkers on the clinical efficacy of single agent romiplostim (ROM) treatment in patients with lower-risk myelodysplastic neoplasms (LR-MDS) and thrombocytopenia within the 'European Myelodysplastic Neoplasms Cooperative Group' (EMSCO) network. A total of 77 patients with LR-MDS and a median platelet count of 25/nl were included, all patients received ROM at a starting dose of 750 μg by SC injection weekly. Thirty-two patients (42%) achieved a hematologic improvement of platelets (HI-P) with a median duration of 340 days. Neutrophil (HI-N) and erythroid (HI-E) responses were observed in three (4%) and seven (9%) patients, respectively. We could not confirm previous reports that HI-P correlated with baseline endogenous thrombopoietin levels and platelet transfusion history, but SRSF2 mutation status and hemoglobin levels at baseline were significantly linked to HI-P. Sequential analysis of variant allelic frequency of mutations like SRSF2 did not reveal an impact of ROM on clonal evolution in both responders and non-responders. In summary, our study confirms the safety and efficacy of ROM in LR-MDS patients and may allow to better define subgroups of patients with a high likelihood of response., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

High-risk myelodysplastic syndrome/acute myeloid leukemia patients have a very poor survival after azacitidine failure. Guadecitabine (SGI-110) is a novel subcutaneous hypomethylating agent which results in extended decitabine exposure. This multicenter phase II study evaluated the efficacy and safety of guadecitabine in high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome and low blast count acute myeloid leukemia patients refractory or relapsing after azacitidine. We included 56 patients with a median age of 75 years [Interquartile Range (IQR) 69-76]. Fifty-five patients received at least one cycle of guadecitabine (60 mg/m2/d subcutaneously days 1-5 per 28-day treatment cycles), with a median of 3 cycles (range, 0-27). Eight (14.3%) patients responded, including two complete responses; median response duration was 11.5 months. Having no or few identified somatic mutations was the only factor predicting response ( P =0.035). None of the 11 patients with TP53 mutation responded. Median overall survival was 7.1 months, and 17.9 months in responders (3 of whom had overall survival >2 years). In multivariate analysis, IPSS-R (revised International Prognostic Scoring System) score other than very high ( P =0.03) primary versus secondary azacitidine failure ( P =0.01) and a high rate of demethylation in blood during the first cycle of treatment ( P =0.03) were associated with longer survival. Thus, guadecitabine can be effective, sometimes yielding relatively prolonged survival, in a small proportion of high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome/low blast count acute myeloid leukemia patients who failed azacitidine. (Trial registered a t clinicaltrials.gov identifier: 02197676 )., (Copyright© 2019 Ferrata Storti Foundation.)

In patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) the impact of the percentage of erythroid precursors in the bone marrow has been the subject of considerable debate, especially with regard to prognosis. We examined the prognostic impact of the percentage of erythroid cells in the bone marrow (bmery) in 2453 primary untreated MDS patients in a retrospective multi-center analysis. Bmery were quantified in bone marrow smears at the time of diagnosis and were correlated with overall survival (OS) and AML evolution. We identified three distinct risk categories: "< = 10% bmery" (poor), "11-25 or >45% bmery" (intermediate), and "26-45% bmery" (good) with distinct OS of 23, 40 and 48 months, respectively. The percentage of bmery showed prognostic significance concerning OS (Dxy = 0.08, p < 0.001) and AML-free survival (Dxy = 0.15, p < 0.001). Considering the IPSS-R by stratification, the Dxy were 0.09 for survival, and 0.18 for transformation (p < 0.001). Added to the IPSS-R, bmery enhances the prognostic power for both survival (Dxy = 0.39) and time to AML (Dxy = 0.59). Survival and time to AML differ in MDS according to the percentage of bmery. The best outcome was found in those who had normal or near normal bmery counts. Moreover, adding bmery as differentiating feature to the IPSS-R may enhance its prognostic significance., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Isolated trisomy 8 (+8) is a frequent cytogenetic abnormality in the myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), but its characteristics are poorly reported. We performed a retrospective study of 138 MDS patients with isolated +8, classified or reclassified as MDS (excluding MDS/myeloproliferative neoplasm). Myeloproliferative (MP) features were defined by the repeated presence of one of the following: white blood cell count >10 × 10 9 /l, myelemia (presence of circulating immature granulocytes with a predominance of more mature forms) >2%, palpable splenomegaly. Fifty-four patients (39·1%) had MP features: 28 at diagnosis, 26 were acquired during evolution. MP forms had more EZH2 (33·3% vs. 12·0% in non-MP, P = 0·047), ASXL1 (66·7% vs. 42·3%, P = 0·048) and STAG2 mutations (77·8% vs. 21·7%, P = 0·006). Median event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) were 25 and 27 months for patients with MP features at diagnosis, versus 28 (P = 0·15) and 39 months (P = 0·085) for those without MP features, respectively. Among the 57 patients who received hypomethylating agent (HMA), OS was lower in MP cases (13 months vs. 23 months in non-MP cases, P = 0.02). In conclusion, MP features are frequent in MDS with isolated +8. MP forms had more EZH2, ASXL1 and STAG2 mutations, responded poorly to HMA, and tended to have poorer survival than non-MP forms., (© 2018 British Society for Haematology and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Purpose Most anemic patients with non-deleted 5q lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are treated with erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs), with a response rate of approximately 50%. Second-line treatments, including hypomethylating agents (HMAs), lenalidomide (LEN), and investigational drugs, may be used after ESA failure in some countries, but their effect on disease progression and overall survival (OS) is unknown. Here, we analyzed outcome after ESA failure and the effect of second-line treatments. Patients and Methods We examined an international retrospective cohort of 1,698 patients with non-del(5q) lower-risk MDS treated with ESAs. Results Erythroid response to ESAs was 61.5%, and median response duration was 17 months. Of 1,147 patients experiencing ESA failure, 653 experienced primary failure and 494 experienced relapse after a response. Primary failure of ESAs was associated with a higher risk of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) progression, which did not translate into an OS difference. Of 450 patients (39%) who received second-line treatment, 194 received HMAs, 148 received LEN, and 108 received other treatments (MISC), whereas 697 received RBC transfusions only. Five-year AML cumulative incidence was 20.3%, 20.3%, and 11.3% for those receiving HMAs, LEN, and MISC, respectively ( P = .05). Five-year OS for patients receiving HMA, LEN, and MISC was 36.5%, 41.7%, and 51%, respectively ( P = .21). In a multivariable analysis adjusted for age, sex, revised International Prognostic Scoring System score, and progression at ESA failure, there was no significant OS difference among the three groups. Conclusion In this large, multicenter, retrospective cohort of patients with non-del(5q) lower-risk MDS treated with ESAs, none of the most commonly used second-line treatments (HMA and LEN) significantly improved OS. Early failure of ESAs was associated with a higher risk of AML progression.