Search

Summary: Wildlife rehabilitators are at risk of zoonotic diseases because they often have prolonged contact with many species of wildlife and their bodily fluids. Raccoon roundworm (Baylisascaris procyonis) is a common zoonotic parasite of raccoons that has the potential to cause severe or fatal neurologic disease in a broad variety of hosts if the eggs within raccoon faeces are ingested. We administered an online survey to wildlife rehabilitators to assess their knowledge regarding aspects of transmission, biology and disease caused by B. procyonis, and also to evaluate attitudes towards wildlife diseases and B. procyonis as an occupational hazard. Knowledge was assessed using multiple choice and true–false questions; attitudes were measured using Likert‐type items. A total of 659 complete or near‐complete responses (missing fewer than three knowledge or attitudes items and/or non‐response to some demographic fields) were collected. The median knowledge score was 7/14 questions correct (range: 0–14 correct). Generally, individuals with higher levels of education and rehabilitation experience, veterinary professionals and those who are members of professional wildlife rehabilitation groups scored above the median significantly more often (p < .01). Significantly more rehabilitators who were located in the south‐east and those with part‐time or infrequent commitments scored below the median overall knowledge score. There was general agreement that B. procyonis is a health risk of rehabilitators and that measures should be taken to control transmission to people and animals. Some factors explaining differences in attitudes include setting of rehabilitation (home versus animal care facility), veterinary profession, region, membership in a wildlife rehabilitation group and rehabilitation of raccoons. Findings emphasize the importance of awareness and mentorship to inform rehabilitators on the potential risks of B. procyonis and other potential zoonoses within captive wildlife settings, and the important role of professional wildlife rehabilitator groups in disseminating educational materials. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The effects of beta blocker therapy in the settings of heart failure and coronary artery disease have been well described, although little data exist in patients presenting with acute coronary syndromes undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. The current study will attempt to evaluate the efficacy of beta blocker therapy in this setting. Pooled data from five randomized, controlled trials of abciximab during coronary intervention were used to analyze the clinical efficacy of beta blocker therapy. The pooled analysis evaluated the end points of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, repeat revascularization, and the combined endpoint of death and myocardial infarction in 2,894 patients. At 30 days, death occurred in 12 of 1,939 (0.6%) patients receiving beta blocker therapy and in 19 of 955 (2.0%) patients not receiving beta blocker therapy, (P < 0.001). At 6 months, death occurred in 33 of 1,939 (1.7%) patients receiving beta blocker therapy and 35 of 955 (3.7%) not receiving beta blocker therapy, (P < 0.001). After creating a propensity model and adjusting for variables predictive of mortality in the multivariable analysis, beta blocker therapy continued to be associated with a significant reduction in mortality. The findings were similar to those shown for the effects of beta blocker therapy in separate subgroups of patients with unstable angina and acute myocardial infarction. This analysis demonstrates a lower short-term mortality in patients receiving beta blocker therapy who undergo percutaneous coronary intervention for unstable angina or acute myocardial infarction. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Fracture of the femoral neck is a common injury, especially in the elderly. Currently, approximately $8.7 billion is spent treating 250,000 femoral neck fractures per year, which indicates that the 500,000 projected to occur annually by 2040 will have a staggering economic impact. The optimal treatment for displaced femoral neck fractures in healthy elderly patients has been controversial. Recent literature supports total hip arthroplasty (THA) as the preferred method, citing equivalent mortality, reduced complication rate, and better functional scores than both fracture reduction and fixation and hemiarthroplasty. The fixation group, which was initially less expensive, had a reoperation rate of 39%, while the arthroplasty group's rate was only 9%.Total hip arthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fracture has potential advantages over open reduction and internal fixation and hemiarthroplasty. Thirty-seven patients who underwent THA for displaced femoral neck fractures between June 1993 and June 2005 were evaluated. The exact head/neck ratios were calculated by the prosthesis manufacturers. The major complication rate was 16.1% (6 of 37) with 5 dislocations (all with surgery prior to 2002) and one nonfatal myocardial infarction. One- and 2-year mortality was 2.7% (1 of 37) and 8.1% (3 of 37), respectively. A smaller head/neck ratio (P=.002) in patients who dislocated was observed. The optimal head/neck ratio was >/= 2.13. Total hip arthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fracture allows patients to return to most preinjury activities. In order to avoid dislocation, constructs with a larger head/neck ratio should be used. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

During metabolic stress testing, 9 of 20 patients with left ventricular assist devices exhibited a lag in peak device rate by < or = 85% of peak native heart rate (group I), with peak device rates of 118 +/- 9 beats/min compared with group II, in which peak device rate nearly equaled peak native rates. Peak systolic blood pressure was significantly greater in group II than group I, but there was no significant difference in peak oxygen consumption, anaerobic threshold, or peak flows. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Trials of anemia correction in chronic kidney disease have found either no benefit or detrimental outcomes of higher targets. We did a secondary analysis of patients with chronic kidney disease enrolled in the Correction of Hemoglobin in the Outcomes in Renal Insufficiency trial to measure the potential for competing benefit and harm from achieved hemoglobin and epoetin dose trials. In the 4 month analysis, significantly more patients in the high-hemoglobin compared to the low-hemoglobin arm were unable to achieve target hemoglobin and required high-dose epoetin-alpha. In unadjusted analyses, the inability to achieve a target hemoglobin and high-dose epoetin-alpha were each significantly associated with increased risk of a primary endpoint (death, myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure or stroke). In adjusted models, high-dose epoetin-alpha was associated with a significant increased hazard of a primary endpoint but the risk associated with randomization to the high hemoglobin arm did not suggest a possible mediating effect of higher target via dose. Similar results were seen in the 9 month analysis. Our study demonstrates that patients achieving their target had better outcomes than those who did not; and among subjects who achieved their randomized target, no increased risk associated with the higher hemoglobin goal was detected. Prospective studies are needed to confirm this relationship and determine safe dosing algorithms for patients unable to achieve target hemoglobin. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We determined the prevalence and clinical predictors of aspirin resistance by prospectively studying 325 patients with stable cardiovascular disease who were receiving aspirin (325 mg/day for > or =7 days) but no other antiplatelet agents. We also compared the detection of aspirin resistance with optical platelet aggregation, a widely accepted method, with a newer, more rapid method, the platelet function analyzer (PFA)-100, a whole blood test that measures platelet adhesion and aggregation ex vivo. Blood samples were analyzed in a blinded fashion for aspirin resistance by optical aggregation using adenosine diphosphate (ADP) and arachidonic acid, and by PFA-100 using collagen and/or epinephrine and collagen and/or ADP cartridges to measure aperture closure time. Aspirin resistance was defined as a mean aggregation of > or =70% with 10 microM ADP and a mean aggregation of > or =20% with 0.5 mg/ml arachidonic acid. Aspirin semiresponders were defined as meeting one, but not both of the above criteria. Aspirin resistance by PFA-100 was defined as having a normal collagen and/or epinephrine closure time (< or =193 seconds). By optical aggregation, 5.5% of the patients were aspirin resistant and 23.8% were aspirin semiresponders. By PFA-100, 9.5% of patients were aspirin resistant. Of the 18 patients who were aspirin resistant by aggregation, 4 were also aspirin resistant by PFA-100. Patients who were either aspirin resistant or aspirin semiresponders were more likely to be women (34.4% vs 17.3%, p = 0.001) and less likely to be smokers (0% vs 8.3%, p = 0.004) compared with aspirin-sensitive patients. There was a trend toward increased age in patients with aspirin resistance or aspirin semiresponders (65.7 vs 61.3 years, p = 0.06). There were no differences in aspirin sensitivity by race, diabetes, platelet count, renal disease, or liver disease. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors have been extensively studied in the treatment of patients with ischemic heart disease. Data regarding the use of these agents in the absence of concomitant intravenous heparin have been conflicting. We sought to determine, using propensity analysis, whether the benefit of eptifibatide, a IIb/IIIa inhibitor, in the treatment of acute coronary syndromes is affected by the concurrent administration of heparin. By trial design, patients were randomized to either eptifibatide or placebo, whereas use of intravenous heparin was left to the discretion of treating physicians. The effect of eptifibatide on the 30-day composite end point of death or myocardial infarction was studied in patients who received heparin and those who did not. Propensity analysis methods were used to control for confounding and presumed selection biases. Among 5,576 patients who were receiving heparin when the bolus dose of the study drug was administered, eptifibatide was associated with a reduced composite end point rate (13%) compared with that of placebo (14.5% vs 16.6%, p = 0.03). In contrast, among 1,441 patients who were not receiving heparin, there was no difference in 30-day event rates with eptifibatide compared with placebo (13.7% vs 13.1%, p > 0.7). After a propensity score for use of heparin was developed, however, use of heparin did not affect the reduced risk associated with eptifibatide (adjusted relative risk [RR] for heparin-eptifibatide interaction term 0.90, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.61 to 1.32, p > 0.5), but the propensity for heparin use was a strong predictor of events (adjusted RR 1.76, 95% CI 1.42 to 2.17, p < 0.001). The use of eptifibatide independently predicted a lower risk of events (adjusted RR 0.31, 95% CI 0.10 to 0.93, p = 0.04). Thus, the apparent positive impact of heparin on the benefits of eptifibatide therapy was largely due to confounding and bias. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Several studies have suggested that there may be an interaction between angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and aspirin in patients with congestive heart failure, such that their benefits are attenuated when used in combination. Whether this interaction exists in patients with coronary artery disease is not known.Subjects and Methods: Patients enrolled in two large trials, Global Utilization of Streptokinase and Tissue Plasminogen Activator for Occluded Coronary Arteries (GUSTO-I) and Evaluation in PTCA to Improve Long-Term Outcome with Abciximab GP IIb/IIIa Blockade (EPILOG), were stratified according to use of aspirin and ACE inhibitors on discharge from the hospital. In the EPILOG trial, left ventricular systolic function was assessed by contrast ventriculography. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality at 1 year. EPILOG patients, all of whom were receiving aspirin, were also examined for the combined endpoint of death or nonfatal myocardial infarction. Stratified and multivariate analyses were used to adjust for baseline differences in patient characteristics.Results: We studied 31,622 patients in the GUSTO-I trial and 2,619 patients in the EPILOG trial. There were 615 deaths among the GUSTO-I patients and 45 deaths among the EPILOG patients at 1 year. Unadjusted mortality was greater among patients treated with both ACE inhibitors and aspirin than among patients treated with aspirin alone (3.3% versus 1.6%, P <0.001 for GUSTO-I; and 3.7% versus 1.2%, P <0.001 for EPILOG). Similarly, the composite endpoint of death or nonfatal myocardial infarction was more frequent among EPILOG patients who were taking ACE inhibitors (6.3% versus 3.3%, P = 0. 001). After adjusting for confounders, combined use of aspirin and ACE inhibitors was associated with increased mortality in GUSTO-I patients (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.2, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.1 to 4.3, P = 0.03) compared with aspirin alone. In EPILOG patients, after adjusting for clinical factors and extent of left ventricular dysfunction, the combination of aspirin and ACE inhibitors was associated with an increased risk of death (HR = 2.1, 95% CI: 1.1 to 3.8, P = 0.02) and of death or nonfatal myocardial infarction (HR = 1.5, 95% CI: 1.1 to 2.5, P = 0.02) compared with aspirin alone.Conclusion: These observational findings suggest the possibility of an interaction between aspirin and ACE inhibitors among patients with ischemic heart disease. Further study of this issue is warranted. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: We assessed in a randomised trial the long-term outcomes for potent adjunctive antiplatelet therapy given at the time of coronary stenting.Methods: In 63 hospitals in the USA and Canada, 2399 patients were randomly assigned stenting with abciximab, stenting with placebo, or balloon angioplasty with abciximab. Standard adjunctive therapy with aspirin, ticlopidine, and heparin was used. The major outcomes of death and myocardial infarction were assessed at 1-year follow-up by intention to treat. We also investigated the 1-year cost-effectiveness of combined stenting and abciximab therapy.Findings: At 1-year follow-up, eight (1.0%) of 794 patients in the stent plus abciximab group had died, compared with 19 (2.4%) of 809 in the stent plus placebo group (hazard ratio 0.43 [95% CI 0.19-0.97], p=0.037). The combined endpoint of death or large myocardial infarction occurred in 42 (5.3%) and 89 (11.0%), respectively (0.46 [0.32-0.67], p<0.001). By multivariate modelling, the factors independently associated with improved survival were assignment to stenting with abciximab (p=0.027) and greater preprocedural stenosis (p=0.002); those associated with worse survival were age greater than 70 years (p<0.001), previous heart failure (p=0.001), diabetes treated with insulin (p=0.02), and postprocedural occlusion (p<0.001). Relative to stenting plus placebo and balloon angioplasty plus abciximab, the incremental 1-year costs of stenting plus abciximab were US$581 and $932. The corresponding cost-effectiveness ratios were US$5291 and $6213 per added life-year.Interpretation: Coronary stenting with abciximab, compared with stenting alone or balloon angioplasty with abciximab, is associated with improved survival and is an economically attractive therapy by conventional standards. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Few data are available in prospectively collected cohorts of patients with unstable angina pectoris or on the use of appropriate medications or interventions. Accordingly, we evaluated 2,948 consecutive patients with unstable angina admitted to 35 hospitals in the United States in 1996, and comparing men and women (39% of the patients were women). Differences were seen in coronary risk profiles with a higher incidence of systemic hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and a family history of coronary disease in women. Women were less likely to receive Agency for Health Care Policy Research (AHCPR) recommended pharmacologic treatment than men. Cardiac catheterization, coronary angioplasty, and bypass was performed less often in women compared with men (44% vs. 53%, p = 0.002; 12% vs. 18%, p = 0.02; 7% vs. 10%, p = 0.001, respectively). At catheterization, women were more likely to have no significant coronary artery disease (25% vs. 14%, p = 0.001). Although fewer women than men fulfilled the AHCPR criteria for cardiac catheterization (54% vs. 64%, p = 0.001), a similar rate of men and women with positive criteria underwent catheterization and angioplasty. However, fewer women with positive criteria underwent bypass surgery (36% vs. 46%, p = 0.03). More men "ruled-in" for a myocardial infarction at admission (13% vs. 8%, p = 0.001), but there was no difference in recurrent angina, in-hospital myocardial infarction, or death. Despite different epidemiologic profiles and less evidence of coronary artery disease by noninvasive and invasive tests, women and men had similar outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]