50 results on '"Sauro, H"'
Search Results
2. Synthetic biology open language visual (SBOL Visual) version 2.3
- Author
-
Baig, H, Fontanarossa, P, Kulkarni, V, McLaughlin, J, Vaidyanathan, P, Bartley, B, Bhakta, S, Bhatia, S, Bissell, M, Clancy, K, Cox, RS, Goñi Moreno, A, Gorochowski, T, Grunberg, R, Lee, J, Luna, A, Madsen, C, Misirli, G, Nguyen, T, Le Novere, N, Palchick, Z, Pocock, M, Roehner, N, Sauro, H, Scott-Brown, J, Sexton, JT, Stan, G-B, Tabor, JJ, Terry, L, Vazquez Vilar, M, Voigt, CA, Wipat, A, Zong, D, Zundel, Z, Beal, J, and Myers, C
- Subjects
R1 - Abstract
People who are engineering biological organisms often find it useful to communicate in diagrams, both about the structure of the nucleic acid sequences that they are engineering and about the functional relationships between sequence features and other molecular species. Some typical practices and conventions have begun to emerge for such diagrams. The Synthetic Biology Open Language Visual (SBOL Visual) has been developed as a standard for organizing and systematizing such conventions in order to produce a coherent language for expressing the structure and function of genetic designs. This document details version 2.3 of SBOL Visual, which builds on the prior SBOL Visual 2.2 in several ways. First, the specification now includes higher-level "interactions with interactions," such as an inducer molecule stimulating a repression interaction. Second, binding with a nucleic acid backbone can be shown by overlapping glyphs, as with other molecular complexes. Finally, a new "unspecified interaction" glyph is added for visualizing interactions whose nature is unknown, the "insulator" glyph is deprecated in favor of a new "inert DNA spacer" glyph, and the polypeptide region glyph is recommended for showing 2A sequences.
- Published
- 2021
3. A C library for retrieving specific reactions from the BioModels database
- Author
-
Neal, M. L., Galdzicki, M., Gallimore, J. T., and Sauro, H. M.
- Published
- 2014
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
4. Control analysis and simulation of metabolism
- Author
-
Sauro, H. M.
- Subjects
612 ,Physiology - Published
- 1986
5. SBML Level 3: an extensible format for the exchange and reuse of biological models
- Author
-
Keating, S, Waltemath, D, König, M, Zhang, F, Dräger, A, Chaouiya, C, Bergmann, F, Finney, A, Gillespie, C, Helikar, T, Hoops, S, Malik-Sheriff, R, Moodie, S, Moraru, I, Myers, C, Naldi, A, Olivier, B, Sahle, S, Schaff, J, Smith, L, Swat, M, Thieffry, D, Watanabe, L, Wilkinson, D, Blinov, M, Begley, K, Faeder, J, Gómez, H, Hamm, T, Inagaki, Y, Liebermeister, W, Lister, A, Lucio, D, Mjolsness, E, Proctor, C, Raman, K, Rodriguez, N, Shaffer, C, Shapiro, B, Stelling, J, Swainston, N, Tanimura, N, Wagner, J, Meier-Schellersheim, M, Sauro, H, Palsson, B, Bolouri, H, Kitano, H, Funahashi, A, Hermjakob, H, Doyle, J, Hucka, M, Adams, R, Allen, N, Angermann, B, Antoniotti, M, Bader, G, Červený, J, Courtot, M, Cox, C, Dalle Pezze, P, Demir, E, Denney, W, Dharuri, H, Dorier, J, Drasdo, D, Ebrahim, A, Eichner, J, Elf, J, Endler, L, Evelo, C, Flamm, C, Fleming, R, Fröhlich, M, Glont, M, Gonçalves, E, Golebiewski, M, Grabski, H, Gutteridge, A, Hachmeister, D, Harris, L, Heavner, B, Henkel, R, Hlavacek, W, Hu, B, Hyduke, D, Jong, H, Juty, N, Karp, P, Karr, J, Kell, D, Keller, R, Kiselev, I, Klamt, S, Klipp, E, Knüpfer, C, Kolpakov, F, Krause, F, Kutmon, M, Laibe, C, Lawless, C, Li, L, Loew, L, Machne, R, Matsuoka, Y, Mendes, P, Mi, H, Mittag, F, Monteiro, P, Natarajan, K, Nielsen, P, Nguyen, T, Palmisano, A, Jean-Baptiste, P, Pfau, T, Phair, R, Radivoyevitch, T, Rohwer, J, Ruebenacker, O, Saez-Rodriguez, J, Scharm, M, Schmidt, H, Schreiber, F, Schubert, M, Schulte, R, Sealfon, S, Smallbone, K, Soliman, S, Stefan, M, Sullivan, D, Takahashi, K, Teusink, B, Tolnay, D, Vazirabad, I, Kamp, A, Wittig, U, Wrzodek, C, Wrzodek, F, Xenarios, I, Zhukova, A, Zucker, J, Keating, SM, Bergmann, FT, Gillespie, CS, Malik-Sheriff, RS, Moodie, SL, Moraru, II, Myers, CJ, Olivier, BG, Schaff, JC, Smith, LP, Swat, MJ, Wilkinson, DJ, Blinov, ML, Faeder, JR, Gómez, HF, Hamm, TM, Lister, AL, Proctor, CJ, Shaffer, CA, Shapiro, BE, Sauro, HM, Doyle, JC, Adams, RR, Allen, NA, Angermann, BR, Bader, GD, Cox, CD, Denney, WS, Evelo, CT, Fleming, RM, Harris, LA, Heavner, BD, Hlavacek, WS, Hyduke, DR, Karp, PD, Karr, JR, Kell, DB, Loew, LM, Monteiro, PT, Natarajan, KN, Nielsen, PM, Phair, RD, Rohwer, JM, Ruebenacker, OA, Sealfon, SC, Stefan, MI, Sullivan, DP, Keating, S, Waltemath, D, König, M, Zhang, F, Dräger, A, Chaouiya, C, Bergmann, F, Finney, A, Gillespie, C, Helikar, T, Hoops, S, Malik-Sheriff, R, Moodie, S, Moraru, I, Myers, C, Naldi, A, Olivier, B, Sahle, S, Schaff, J, Smith, L, Swat, M, Thieffry, D, Watanabe, L, Wilkinson, D, Blinov, M, Begley, K, Faeder, J, Gómez, H, Hamm, T, Inagaki, Y, Liebermeister, W, Lister, A, Lucio, D, Mjolsness, E, Proctor, C, Raman, K, Rodriguez, N, Shaffer, C, Shapiro, B, Stelling, J, Swainston, N, Tanimura, N, Wagner, J, Meier-Schellersheim, M, Sauro, H, Palsson, B, Bolouri, H, Kitano, H, Funahashi, A, Hermjakob, H, Doyle, J, Hucka, M, Adams, R, Allen, N, Angermann, B, Antoniotti, M, Bader, G, Červený, J, Courtot, M, Cox, C, Dalle Pezze, P, Demir, E, Denney, W, Dharuri, H, Dorier, J, Drasdo, D, Ebrahim, A, Eichner, J, Elf, J, Endler, L, Evelo, C, Flamm, C, Fleming, R, Fröhlich, M, Glont, M, Gonçalves, E, Golebiewski, M, Grabski, H, Gutteridge, A, Hachmeister, D, Harris, L, Heavner, B, Henkel, R, Hlavacek, W, Hu, B, Hyduke, D, Jong, H, Juty, N, Karp, P, Karr, J, Kell, D, Keller, R, Kiselev, I, Klamt, S, Klipp, E, Knüpfer, C, Kolpakov, F, Krause, F, Kutmon, M, Laibe, C, Lawless, C, Li, L, Loew, L, Machne, R, Matsuoka, Y, Mendes, P, Mi, H, Mittag, F, Monteiro, P, Natarajan, K, Nielsen, P, Nguyen, T, Palmisano, A, Jean-Baptiste, P, Pfau, T, Phair, R, Radivoyevitch, T, Rohwer, J, Ruebenacker, O, Saez-Rodriguez, J, Scharm, M, Schmidt, H, Schreiber, F, Schubert, M, Schulte, R, Sealfon, S, Smallbone, K, Soliman, S, Stefan, M, Sullivan, D, Takahashi, K, Teusink, B, Tolnay, D, Vazirabad, I, Kamp, A, Wittig, U, Wrzodek, C, Wrzodek, F, Xenarios, I, Zhukova, A, Zucker, J, Keating, SM, Bergmann, FT, Gillespie, CS, Malik-Sheriff, RS, Moodie, SL, Moraru, II, Myers, CJ, Olivier, BG, Schaff, JC, Smith, LP, Swat, MJ, Wilkinson, DJ, Blinov, ML, Faeder, JR, Gómez, HF, Hamm, TM, Lister, AL, Proctor, CJ, Shaffer, CA, Shapiro, BE, Sauro, HM, Doyle, JC, Adams, RR, Allen, NA, Angermann, BR, Bader, GD, Cox, CD, Denney, WS, Evelo, CT, Fleming, RM, Harris, LA, Heavner, BD, Hlavacek, WS, Hyduke, DR, Karp, PD, Karr, JR, Kell, DB, Loew, LM, Monteiro, PT, Natarajan, KN, Nielsen, PM, Phair, RD, Rohwer, JM, Ruebenacker, OA, Sealfon, SC, Stefan, MI, and Sullivan, DP
- Abstract
Systems biology has experienced dramatic growth in the number, size, and complexity of computational models. To reproduce simulation results and reuse models, researchers must exchange unambiguous model descriptions. We review the latest edition of the Systems Biology Markup Language (SBML), a format designed for this purpose. A community of modelers and software authors developed SBML Level 3 over the past decade. Its modular form consists of a core suited to representing reaction-based models and packages that extend the core with features suited to other model types including constraint-based models, reaction-diffusion models, logical network models, and rule-based models. The format leverages two decades of SBML and a rich software ecosystem that transformed how systems biologists build and interact with models. More recently, the rise of multiscale models of whole cells and organs, and new data sources such as single-cell measurements and live imaging, has precipitated new ways of integrating data with models. We provide our perspectives on the challenges presented by these developments and how SBML Level 3 provides the foundation needed to support this evolution.
- Published
- 2020
6. The systems biology markup language (SBML): a medium for representation and exchange of biochemical network models
- Author
-
Hucka, M, Finney, A, Sauro, H M., Bolouri, H, Doyle, J C., Kitano, H, Arkin, A P., Bornstein, B J., Bray, D, Cornish-Bowden, A, Cuellar, A A., Dronov, S, Gilles, E D., Ginkel, M, Gor, V, Goryanin, I I., Hedley, W J., Hodgman, T C., Hofmeyr, J-H, Hunter, P J., Juty, N S., Kasberger, J L., Kremling, A, Kummer, U, Le Novère, N, Loew, L M., Lucio, D, Mendes, P, Minch, E, Mjolsness, E D., Nakayama, Y, Nelson, M R., Nielsen, P F., Sakurada, T, Schaff, J C., Shapiro, B E., Shimizu, T S., Spence, H D., Stelling, J, Takahashi, K, Tomita, M, Wagner, J, and Wang, J
- Published
- 2003
7. Data Integration and Mining for Synthetic Biology Design
- Author
-
Mısırlı, G, Hallinan, J, Pocock, M, Lord, P, McLaughlin, JA, Sauro, H, and Wipat, A
- Subjects
ontologies ,data mining ,synthetic biology ,automated identification of biological parts ,data integration ,QA76 ,Semantic Web - Abstract
One aim of synthetic biologists is to create novel and predictable biological systems from simpler modular parts. This approach is currently hampered by a lack of well-defined and characterized parts and devices. However, there is a wealth of existing biological information, which can be used to identify and characterize biological parts, and their design constraints in the literature and numerous biological databases. However, this information is spread among these databases in many different formats. New computational approaches are required to make this information available in an integrated format that is more amenable to data mining. A tried and tested approach to this problem is to map disparate data sources into a single data set, with common syntax and semantics, to produce a data warehouse or knowledge base. Ontologies have been used extensively in the life sciences, providing this common syntax and semantics as a model for a given biological domain, in a fashion that is amenable to computational analysis and reasoning. Here, we present an ontology for applications in synthetic biology design, SyBiOnt, which facilitates the modeling of information about biological parts and their relationships. SyBiOnt was used to create the SyBiOntKB knowledge base, incorporating and building upon existing life sciences ontologies and standards. The reasoning capabilities of ontologies were then applied to automate the mining of biological parts from this knowledge base. We propose that this approach will be useful to speed up synthetic biology design and ultimately help facilitate the automation of the biological engineering life cycle.
- Published
- 2016
8. Correction to ‘Control and regulation of pathways via negative feedback’
- Author
-
Sauro, H. M., primary
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
9. Editorial Reproducibility of Computational Models
- Author
-
Erdemir, A., primary and Sauro, H. M., additional
- Published
- 2016
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
10. Computer algebra approaches to enzyme kinetics
- Author
-
Bennett, J. P., primary, Davenport, J. H., additional, Dewar, M. C., additional, Fisher, D. L., additional, Grinfeld, M., additional, and Sauro, H. M., additional
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
11. A C library for retrieving specific reactions from the BioModels database
- Author
-
Neal, M. L., primary, Galdzicki, M., additional, Gallimore, J. T., additional, and Sauro, H. M., additional
- Published
- 2013
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
12. Challenges for Modeling and Simulation Methods in Systems Biology.
- Author
-
Sauro, H M, Uhrmacher, A, Harel, D, Hucka, M, Kwiatkowska, M, Mendes, P, Strömbäck, Lena, Tyson, J J, Sauro, H M, Uhrmacher, A, Harel, D, Hucka, M, Kwiatkowska, M, Mendes, P, Strömbäck, Lena, and Tyson, J J
- Published
- 2006
13. Bifurcation discovery tool
- Author
-
Chickarmane, V., primary, Paladugu, S. R., additional, Bergmann, F., additional, and Sauro, H. M., additional
- Published
- 2005
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
14. THE ERATO SYSTEMS BIOLOGY WORKBENCH: ENABLING INTERACTION AND EXCHANGE BETWEEN SOFTWARE TOOLS FOR COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY
- Author
-
HUCKA, M., primary, FINNEY, A., additional, SAURO, H. M., additional, BOLOURI, H., additional, DOYLE, J., additional, and KITANO, H., additional
- Published
- 2001
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
15. In silico evolution of functional modules in biochemical networks.
- Author
-
Paladugu, S. R., Chickarmane, V., Deckard, A., Frumkin, J. P., McCormack, M., and Sauro, H. M.
- Subjects
BIOCHEMISTRY ,BIOLOGY ,LIFE sciences ,LIFE (Biology) ,PROTEINS ,BIOMOLECULES - Abstract
Understanding the large reaction networks found in biological systems is a daunting task. One approach is to divide a network into more manageable smaller modules, thus simplifying the problem. This is a common strategy used in engineering. However, the process of identifying biological modules is still in its infancy and very little is understood about the range and capabilities of motif structures found in biological modules. In order to delineate these modules, a library of functional motifs has been generated via in silico evolution techniques. On the basis of their functional forms, networks were evolved from four broad areas: oscillators, bistable switches, homeostatic systems and frequency filters. Some of these motifs were constructed from simple mass action kinetics, others were based on Michaelis–Menten kinetics as found in protein/protein networks and the remainder were based on Hill equations as found in gene/protein interaction networks. The purpose of the study is to explore the capabilities of different network architectures and the rich variety of functional forms that can be generated. Ultimately, the library may be used to delineate functional motifs in real biological networks. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2006
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
16. Modeling and design automation of biological circuits and systems
- Author
-
Miskov-Zivanov, N., James Faeder, Myers, C. J., and Sauro, H. M.
17. Moiety-conserved cycles and metabolic control analysis: problems in sequestration and metabolic channelling
- Author
-
Sauro, H. M.
- Published
- 1994
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
18. SBML Level 3: an extensible format for the exchange and reuse of biological models
- Author
-
Edda Klipp, Marco Antoniotti, Frank Bergmann, James C. Schaff, Peter D. Karp, Daniel Lucio, Kedar Nath Natarajan, Thomas M. Hamm, Leandro Watanabe, Henning Hermjakob, David Tolnay, John Wagner, Joerg Stelling, Alida Palmisano, Falk Schreiber, Yukiko Matsuoka, Harold F. Gómez, Huaiyu Mi, Carole J. Proctor, Ulrike Wittig, Neil Swainston, Jan Červený, Denis Thieffry, Piero Dalle Pezze, Julio Saez-Rodriguez, Maciej J. Swat, Bin Hu, Martina Kutmon, Thomas Pfau, Bas Teusink, Sarah M. Keating, Fedor A. Kolpakov, Andreas Dräger, Pedro Mendes, Martin Scharm, Emek Demir, Ioannis Xenarios, Christoph Flamm, Axel von Kamp, Darren J. Wilkinson, Nick Juty, Fengkai Zhang, Leonard A. Harris, Michael Schubert, Dagmar Waltemath, Lucian P. Smith, Steffen Klamt, Herbert M. Sauro, Ali Ebrahim, Wolfram Liebermeister, Christian Knüpfer, Nicolas Rodriguez, Tramy Nguyen, Naoki Tanimura, Christopher Cox, Stuart C. Sealfon, Nicholas Alexander Allen, Clemens Wrzodek, Bastian R. Angermann, Martin Meier-Schellersheim, Anna Zhukova, Jean-Baptiste Pettit, Hovakim Grabski, Devin P. Sullivan, Claudine Chaouiya, Michael L. Blinov, John Doyle, Ilya Kiselev, Roman Schulte, Alex Gutteridge, Mélanie Courtot, Eric Mjolsness, Finja Wrzodek, Rahuman S Malik-Sheriff, Ronan M. T. Fleming, Bruce E. Shapiro, Kimberly Begley, Leslie M. Loew, Colin S. Gillespie, Ibrahim Vazirabad, Michael Hucka, Akira Funahashi, Bernhard O. Palsson, Hamid Bolouri, Tomáš Helikar, Camille Laibe, William S. Denney, Chris T. Evelo, Florian Mittag, William S. Hlavacek, Ron Henkel, Harish Dharuri, Julien Dorier, Karthik Raman, Martina Fröhlich, Conor Lawless, Rainer Machné, Falko Krause, Damon Hachmeister, Matthias König, Clifford A. Shaffer, Benjamin D. Heavner, Douglas B. Kell, Jonathan R. Karr, Mihai Glont, Lukas Endler, Melanie I. Stefan, Robert Phair, Lu Li, Henning Schmidt, Dirk Drasdo, Johan Elf, Allyson L. Lister, Hiroaki Kitano, Richard R. Adams, Oliver A. Ruebenacker, Roland Keller, Sven Sahle, Ion I. Moraru, Gary D. Bader, Poul M. F. Nielsen, Johann M. Rohwer, Johannes Eichner, Daniel R. Hyduke, James R. Faeder, Stefan Hoops, Emanuel Gonçalves, Yuichiro Inagaki, Aurélien Naldi, Koichi Takahashi, Sylvain Soliman, Brett G. Olivier, Kieran Smallbone, Stuart L. Moodie, Pedro T. Monteiro, Chris J. Myers, Martin Golebiewski, Tomas Radivoyevitch, Jeremy Zucker, Hidde de Jong, Andrew Finney, Keating, S, Waltemath, D, König, M, Zhang, F, Dräger, A, Chaouiya, C, Bergmann, F, Finney, A, Gillespie, C, Helikar, T, Hoops, S, Malik-Sheriff, R, Moodie, S, Moraru, I, Myers, C, Naldi, A, Olivier, B, Sahle, S, Schaff, J, Smith, L, Swat, M, Thieffry, D, Watanabe, L, Wilkinson, D, Blinov, M, Begley, K, Faeder, J, Gómez, H, Hamm, T, Inagaki, Y, Liebermeister, W, Lister, A, Lucio, D, Mjolsness, E, Proctor, C, Raman, K, Rodriguez, N, Shaffer, C, Shapiro, B, Stelling, J, Swainston, N, Tanimura, N, Wagner, J, Meier-Schellersheim, M, Sauro, H, Palsson, B, Bolouri, H, Kitano, H, Funahashi, A, Hermjakob, H, Doyle, J, Hucka, M, Adams, R, Allen, N, Angermann, B, Antoniotti, M, Bader, G, Červený, J, Courtot, M, Cox, C, Dalle Pezze, P, Demir, E, Denney, W, Dharuri, H, Dorier, J, Drasdo, D, Ebrahim, A, Eichner, J, Elf, J, Endler, L, Evelo, C, Flamm, C, Fleming, R, Fröhlich, M, Glont, M, Gonçalves, E, Golebiewski, M, Grabski, H, Gutteridge, A, Hachmeister, D, Harris, L, Heavner, B, Henkel, R, Hlavacek, W, Hu, B, Hyduke, D, Jong, H, Juty, N, Karp, P, Karr, J, Kell, D, Keller, R, Kiselev, I, Klamt, S, Klipp, E, Knüpfer, C, Kolpakov, F, Krause, F, Kutmon, M, Laibe, C, Lawless, C, Li, L, Loew, L, Machne, R, Matsuoka, Y, Mendes, P, Mi, H, Mittag, F, Monteiro, P, Natarajan, K, Nielsen, P, Nguyen, T, Palmisano, A, Jean-Baptiste, P, Pfau, T, Phair, R, Radivoyevitch, T, Rohwer, J, Ruebenacker, O, Saez-Rodriguez, J, Scharm, M, Schmidt, H, Schreiber, F, Schubert, M, Schulte, R, Sealfon, S, Smallbone, K, Soliman, S, Stefan, M, Sullivan, D, Takahashi, K, Teusink, B, Tolnay, D, Vazirabad, I, Kamp, A, Wittig, U, Wrzodek, C, Wrzodek, F, Xenarios, I, Zhukova, A, Zucker, J, European Bioinformatics Institute [Hinxton] (EMBL-EBI), EMBL Heidelberg, Heidelberg University Hospital [Heidelberg], Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics [Lausanne] (SIB), Université de Lausanne = University of Lausanne (UNIL), European Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL), University of Connecticut (UCONN), National Institutes of Health [Bethesda] (NIH), Chercheur indépendant, Amazon Web Services [Seattle] (AWS), Università degli Studi di Milano-Bicocca = University of Milano-Bicocca (UNIMIB), University of Toronto, Masaryk University [Brno] (MUNI), Terry Fox Laboratory, BC Cancer Agency (BCCRC)-British Columbia Cancer Agency Research Centre, The University of Tennessee [Knoxville], The Babraham Institute [Cambridge, UK], Oregon Health and Science University [Portland] (OHSU), Human Predictions LLC, Illumina, Swiss-Prot Group, Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics [Genève] (SIB), Modelling and Analysis for Medical and Biological Applications (MAMBA), Inria de Paris, Institut National de Recherche en Informatique et en Automatique (Inria)-Institut National de Recherche en Informatique et en Automatique (Inria)-Laboratoire Jacques-Louis Lions (LJLL (UMR_7598)), Sorbonne Université (SU)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université Paris Cité (UPCité)-Sorbonne Université (SU)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université Paris Cité (UPCité), University of California [San Diego] (UC San Diego), University of California (UC), Center for Bioinformatics (ZBIT), Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen = Eberhard Karls University of Tuebingen, Uppsala University, Institut für Populationsgenetik [Vienna], Veterinärmedizinische Universität Wien, Maastricht University [Maastricht], Alpen-Adria-Universität Klagenfurt [Klagenfurt, Austria], Medizinische Universität Wien = Medical University of Vienna, German Cancer Research Center - Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum [Heidelberg] (DKFZ), Heidelberg Institute for Theoretical Studies (HITS ), Russian-Armenian University (RAU), GlaxoSmithKline [Stevenage, UK] (GSK), GlaxoSmithKline [Headquarters, London, UK] (GSK), Microsoft Technology Licensing (MTL), Microsoft Corporation [Redmond, Wash.], Vanderbilt University School of Medicine [Nashville], University of Washington [Seattle], University of Rostock, Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL), Lorentz Institute, Universiteit Leiden, Tegmine Therapeutics, Modeling, simulation, measurement, and control of bacterial regulatory networks (IBIS), Laboratoire Adaptation et pathogénie des micro-organismes [Grenoble] (LAPM), Université Joseph Fourier - Grenoble 1 (UJF)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université Joseph Fourier - Grenoble 1 (UJF)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Inria Grenoble - Rhône-Alpes, Institut National de Recherche en Informatique et en Automatique (Inria)-Institut National de Recherche en Informatique et en Automatique (Inria)-Institut Jean Roget, SRI International [Menlo Park] (SRI), Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai [New York] (MSSM), University of Liverpool, Universitätsklinikum Tübingen - University Hospital of Tübingen, Institute of Information and Computational Technologies (IICT), Max Planck Institute for Dynamics of Complex Technical Systems, Max-Planck-Gesellschaft, Max-Planck-Institut für Molekulare Genetik (MPIMG), Friedrich-Schiller-Universität = Friedrich Schiller University Jena [Jena, Germany], Humboldt University Of Berlin, Newcastle University [Newcastle], École polytechnique (X), Heinrich Heine Universität Düsseldorf = Heinrich Heine University [Düsseldorf], The Systems Biology Institute [Tokyo] (SBI), Centro de Quimica Estrutural (CQE), Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade Técnica de Lisboa (IST), University of Southern California (USC), Instituto Gulbenkian de Ciência [Oeiras] (IGC), Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian, University of Southern Denmark (SDU), University of Auckland [Auckland], University of Utah, Virginia Tech [Blacksburg], University of Luxembourg [Luxembourg], Integrative Bioinformatics Inc [Mountain View], Cleveland Clinic, Stellenbosch University, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard (BROAD INSTITUTE), Harvard Medical School [Boston] (HMS)-Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT)-Massachusetts General Hospital [Boston], Universität Heidelberg [Heidelberg] = Heidelberg University, Leibniz Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research [Gatersleben] (IPK-Gatersleben), Laboratoire de Biologie du Développement de Villefranche sur mer (LBDV), Sorbonne Université (SU)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Institut de la Mer de Villefranche (IMEV), Sorbonne Université (SU)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Sorbonne Université (SU)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Mount Sinai School of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry-Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai [New York] (MSSM), University of Manchester [Manchester], Computational systems biology and optimization (Lifeware), Inria Saclay - Ile de France, Institut National de Recherche en Informatique et en Automatique (Inria)-Institut National de Recherche en Informatique et en Automatique (Inria), California Institute of Technology (CALTECH), Encodia Inc [San Diego], Shinshu University [Nagano], University of Amsterdam [Amsterdam] (UvA), Versiti Blood Center of Wisconsin, Greifswald University Hospital, Bioinformatique évolutive - Evolutionary Bioinformatics, Institut Pasteur [Paris] (IP)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL), National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases [Bethesda] (NIAID-NIH), Department of Bioengineering, University of California (UC)-University of California (UC), ANSYS, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University [Blacksburg], Eight Pillars Ltd, Center for Integrative Genomics - Institute of Bioinformatics, Génopode (CIG), Université de Lausanne = University of Lausanne (UNIL)-Université de Lausanne = University of Lausanne (UNIL), Universität Heidelberg, Bioquant, Applied Biomathematics [New York], SimCYP Ltd, Institut de biologie de l'ENS Paris (IBENS), Département de Biologie - ENS Paris, École normale supérieure - Paris (ENS-PSL), Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-École normale supérieure - Paris (ENS-PSL), Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), University of Utah School of Medicine [Salt Lake City], University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pennsylvania Commonwealth System of Higher Education (PCSHE), Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule - Swiss Federal Institute of Technology [Zürich] (ETH Zürich), Mizuho Information and Research Institute, Mathématiques et Informatique Appliquées du Génome à l'Environnement [Jouy-En-Josas] (MaIAGE), Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement (INRAE), University of Oxford, Computer Science (North Carolina State University), North Carolina State University [Raleigh] (NC State), University of North Carolina System (UNC)-University of North Carolina System (UNC), University of California [Irvine] (UC Irvine), Indian Institute of Technology Madras (IIT Madras), California State University [Northridge] (CSUN), Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC), IBM Research [Melbourne], Benaroya Research Institute [Seattle] (BRI), Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology Graduate University, Keio University, Department of Computing and Mathematical sciences, members, SBML Level 3 Community, Université de Lausanne (UNIL), Università degli Studi di Milano-Bicocca [Milano] (UNIMIB), Sorbonne Université (SU)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université de Paris (UP)-Sorbonne Université (SU)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université de Paris (UP), University of California, Universiteit Leiden [Leiden], Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université Joseph Fourier - Grenoble 1 (UJF)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université Joseph Fourier - Grenoble 1 (UJF)-Inria Grenoble - Rhône-Alpes, Humboldt University of Berlin, Universität Heidelberg [Heidelberg], Institut Pasteur [Paris]-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, University of California-University of California, Université de Lausanne (UNIL)-Université de Lausanne (UNIL), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)-Département de Biologie - ENS Paris, École normale supérieure - Paris (ENS Paris), Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)-École normale supérieure - Paris (ENS Paris), Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), University of Oxford [Oxford], University of California [Irvine] (UCI), Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council, Computer Science, Institut de biologie de l'ENS Paris (UMR 8197/1024) (IBENS), and Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-École normale supérieure - Paris (ENS Paris)
- Subjects
computational modeling ,Medicine (General) ,Markup language ,[SDV.BIO]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Biotechnology ,INFORMATION ,Interoperability ,interoperability ,Review ,[SDV.BC.BC]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Cellular Biology/Subcellular Processes [q-bio.SC] ,ANNOTATION ,0302 clinical medicine ,Software ,file forma ,Models ,Biology (General) ,0303 health sciences ,Computational model ,Applied Mathematics ,Systems Biology ,systems biology ,File format ,3. Good health ,Networking and Information Technology R&D ,Networking and Information Technology R&D (NITRD) ,Computational Theory and Mathematics ,SIMULATION ,General Agricultural and Biological Sciences ,STANDARDS ,REPOSITORY ,Information Systems ,QH301-705.5 ,Bioinformatics ,Systems biology ,Software ecosystem ,Reviews ,Bioengineering ,Methods & Resources ,Biology ,MARKUP LANGUAGE ,Models, Biological ,SBML Level 3 Community members ,General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology ,03 medical and health sciences ,R5-920 ,Animals ,Humans ,SBML ,reproducibility ,030304 developmental biology ,ENVIRONMENT ,General Immunology and Microbiology ,file format ,business.industry ,Computational Biology ,Biological ,ONTOLOGY ,Metabolism ,Logistic Models ,Biochemistry and Cell Biology ,Other Biological Sciences ,Software engineering ,business ,030217 neurology & neurosurgery - Abstract
Systems biology has experienced dramatic growth in the number, size, and complexity of computational models. To reproduce simulation results and reuse models, researchers must exchange unambiguous model descriptions. We review the latest edition of the Systems Biology Markup Language (SBML), a format designed for this purpose. A community of modelers and software authors developed SBML Level 3 over the past decade. Its modular form consists of a core suited to representing reaction‐based models and packages that extend the core with features suited to other model types including constraint‐based models, reaction‐diffusion models, logical network models, and rule‐based models. The format leverages two decades of SBML and a rich software ecosystem that transformed how systems biologists build and interact with models. More recently, the rise of multiscale models of whole cells and organs, and new data sources such as single‐cell measurements and live imaging, has precipitated new ways of integrating data with models. We provide our perspectives on the challenges presented by these developments and how SBML Level 3 provides the foundation needed to support this evolution., Over the past two decades, scientists from different fields have been developing SBML, a standard format for encoding computational models in biology and medicine. This article summarizes recent progress and gives perspectives on emerging challenges.
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
19. The simulation experiment description markup language (SED-ML): language specification for level 1 version 5.
- Author
-
Smith LP, Bergmann FT, Garny A, Helikar T, Karr J, Nickerson D, Sauro H, Waltemath D, and König M
- Subjects
- Algorithms, Models, Biological, Humans, Computational Biology methods, Programming Languages, Computer Simulation, Software
- Abstract
Modern biological research is increasingly informed by computational simulation experiments, which necessitate the development of methods for annotating, archiving, sharing, and reproducing the conducted experiments. These simulations increasingly require extensive collaboration among modelers, experimentalists, and engineers. The Minimum Information About a Simulation Experiment (MIASE) guidelines outline the information needed to share simulation experiments. SED-ML is a computer-readable format for the information outlined by MIASE, created as a community project and supported by many investigators and software tools. Level 1 Version 5 of SED-ML expands the ability of modelers to define simulations in SED-ML using the Kinetic Simulation Algorithm Onotoloy (KiSAO). While it was possible in Version 4 to define a simulation entirely using KiSAO, Version 5 now allows users to define tasks, model changes, ranges, and outputs using the ontology as well. SED-ML is supported by a growing ecosystem of investigators, model languages, and software tools, including various languages for constraint-based, kinetic, qualitative, rule-based, and spatial models, and many simulation tools, visual editors, model repositories, and validators. Additional information about SED-ML is available at https://sed-ml.org/., (© 2024 the author(s), published by De Gruyter, Berlin/Boston.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
20. Addressing the genetic/nongenetic duality in cancer with systems biology.
- Author
-
Kulkarni P, Wiley HS, Levine H, Sauro H, Anderson A, Wong STC, Meyer AS, Iyengar P, Corlette K, Swanson K, Mohanty A, Bhattacharya S, Patel A, Jain V, and Salgia R
- Subjects
- Humans, Systems Biology, Neoplasms genetics
- Abstract
The dogma that cancer is a genetic disease is being questioned. Recent findings suggest that genetic/nongenetic duality is necessary for cancer progression. A think tank organized by the Shraman Foundation's Institute for Theoretical Biology compiled key challenges and opportunities that theoreticians, experimentalists, and clinicians can explore from a systems biology perspective to provide a better understanding of the disease as well as help discover new treatment options and therapeutic strategies., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests No interests are declared., (Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier Inc.)
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
21. The simulation experiment description markup language (SED-ML): language specification for level 1 version 4.
- Author
-
Smith LP, Bergmann FT, Garny A, Helikar T, Karr J, Nickerson D, Sauro H, Waltemath D, and König M
- Subjects
- Ecosystem, Models, Biological, Systems Biology, Language, Programming Languages
- Abstract
Computational simulation experiments increasingly inform modern biological research, and bring with them the need to provide ways to annotate, archive, share and reproduce the experiments performed. These simulations increasingly require extensive collaboration among modelers, experimentalists, and engineers. The Minimum Information About a Simulation Experiment (MIASE) guidelines outline the information needed to share simulation experiments. SED-ML is a computer-readable format for the information outlined by MIASE, created as a community project and supported by many investigators and software tools. The first versions of SED-ML focused on deterministic and stochastic simulations of models. Level 1 Version 4 of SED-ML substantially expands these capabilities to cover additional types of models, model languages, parameter estimations, simulations and analyses of models, and analyses and visualizations of simulation results. To facilitate consistent practices across the community, Level 1 Version 4 also more clearly describes the use of SED-ML constructs, and includes numerous concrete validation rules. SED-ML is supported by a growing ecosystem of investigators, model languages, and software tools, including eight languages for constraint-based, kinetic, qualitative, rule-based, and spatial models, over 20 simulation tools, visual editors, model repositories, and validators. Additional information about SED-ML is available at https://sed-ml.org/., Competing Interests: Authors state no conflict of interest., (2021 Lucian P. Smith et al.)
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
22. Synthetic biology open language visual (SBOL Visual) version 2.3.
- Author
-
Baig H, Fontanarossa P, Kulkarni V, McLaughlin J, Vaidyanathan P, Bartley B, Bhakta S, Bhatia S, Bissell M, Clancy K, Cox RS, Goñi Moreno A, Gorochowski T, Grunberg R, Lee J, Luna A, Madsen C, Misirli G, Nguyen T, Le Novere N, Palchick Z, Pocock M, Roehner N, Sauro H, Scott-Brown J, Sexton JT, Stan GB, Tabor JJ, Terry L, Vazquez Vilar M, Voigt CA, Wipat A, Zong D, Zundel Z, Beal J, and Myers C
- Subjects
- Humans, Language, Programming Languages, Synthetic Biology
- Abstract
People who are engineering biological organisms often find it useful to communicate in diagrams, both about the structure of the nucleic acid sequences that they are engineering and about the functional relationships between sequence features and other molecular species. Some typical practices and conventions have begun to emerge for such diagrams. The Synthetic Biology Open Language Visual (SBOL Visual) has been developed as a standard for organizing and systematizing such conventions in order to produce a coherent language for expressing the structure and function of genetic designs. This document details version 2.3 of SBOL Visual, which builds on the prior SBOL Visual 2.2 in several ways. First, the specification now includes higher-level "interactions with interactions," such as an inducer molecule stimulating a repression interaction. Second, binding with a nucleic acid backbone can be shown by overlapping glyphs, as with other molecular complexes. Finally, a new "unspecified interaction" glyph is added for visualizing interactions whose nature is unknown, the "insulator" glyph is deprecated in favor of a new "inert DNA spacer" glyph, and the polypeptide region glyph is recommended for showing 2A sequences., (© 2021 Hasan Baig et al., published by De Gruyter, Berlin/Boston.)
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
23. Synthetic biology open language visual (SBOL visual) version 2.2.
- Author
-
Baig H, Fontanarrosa P, Kulkarni V, McLaughlin J, Vaidyanathan P, Bartley B, Bhatia S, Bhakta S, Bissell M, Clancy K, Cox RS, Moreno AG, Gorochowski T, Grunberg R, Luna A, Madsen C, Misirli G, Nguyen T, Le Novere N, Palchick Z, Pocock M, Roehner N, Sauro H, Scott-Brown J, Sexton JT, Stan GB, Tabor JJ, Vilar MV, Voigt CA, Wipat A, Zong D, Zundel Z, Beal J, and Myers C
- Subjects
- Humans, Language, Programming Languages, Synthetic Biology
- Abstract
People who are engineering biological organisms often find it useful to communicate in diagrams, both about the structure of the nucleic acid sequences that they are engineering and about the functional relationships between sequence features and other molecular species. Some typical practices and conventions have begun to emerge for such diagrams. The Synthetic Biology Open Language Visual (SBOL Visual) has been developed as a standard for organizing and systematizing such conventions in order to produce a coherent language for expressing the structure and function of genetic designs. This document details version 2.2 of SBOL Visual, which builds on the prior SBOL Visual 2.1 in several ways. First, the grounding of molecular species glyphs is changed from BioPAX to SBO, aligning with the use of SBO terms for interaction glyphs. Second, new glyphs are added for proteins, introns, and polypeptide regions (e. g., protein domains), the prior recommended macromolecule glyph is deprecated in favor of its alternative, and small polygons are introduced as alternative glyphs for simple chemicals.
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
24. Communicating Structure and Function in Synthetic Biology Diagrams.
- Author
-
Beal J, Nguyen T, Gorochowski TE, Goñi-Moreno A, Scott-Brown J, McLaughlin JA, Madsen C, Aleritsch B, Bartley B, Bhakta S, Bissell M, Castillo Hair S, Clancy K, Luna A, Le Novère N, Palchick Z, Pocock M, Sauro H, Sexton JT, Tabor JJ, Voigt CA, Zundel Z, Myers C, and Wipat A
- Subjects
- Models, Theoretical, Software, Programming Languages, Synthetic Biology methods
- Abstract
Biological engineers often find it useful to communicate using diagrams. These diagrams can include information both about the structure of the nucleic acid sequences they are engineering and about the functional relationships between features of these sequences and/or other molecular species. A number of conventions and practices have begun to emerge within synthetic biology for creating such diagrams, and the Synthetic Biology Open Language Visual (SBOL Visual) has been developed as a standard to organize, systematize, and extend such conventions in order to produce a coherent visual language. Here, we describe SBOL Visual version 2, which expands previous diagram standards to include new functional interactions, categories of molecular species, support for families of glyph variants, and the ability to indicate modular structure and mappings between elements of a system. SBOL Visual 2 also clarifies a number of requirements and best practices, significantly expands the collection of glyphs available to describe genetic features, and can be readily applied using a wide variety of software tools, both general and bespoke.
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
25. Synthetic Biology Open Language (SBOL) Version 2.3.
- Author
-
Madsen C, Goñi Moreno A, P U, Palchick Z, Roehner N, Atallah C, Bartley B, Choi K, Cox RS, Gorochowski T, Grünberg R, Macklin C, McLaughlin J, Meng X, Nguyen T, Pocock M, Samineni M, Scott-Brown J, Tarter Y, Zhang M, Zhang Z, Zundel Z, Beal J, Bissell M, Clancy K, Gennari JH, Misirli G, Myers C, Oberortner E, Sauro H, and Wipat A
- Subjects
- Humans, Programming Languages, Models, Biological, Synthetic Biology, Systems Biology
- Abstract
Synthetic biology builds upon the techniques and successes of genetics, molecular biology, and metabolic engineering by applying engineering principles to the design of biological systems. The field still faces substantial challenges, including long development times, high rates of failure, and poor reproducibility. One method to ameliorate these problems is to improve the exchange of information about designed systems between laboratories. The synthetic biology open language (SBOL) has been developed as a standard to support the specification and exchange of biological design information in synthetic biology, filling a need not satisfied by other pre-existing standards. This document details version 2.3.0 of SBOL, which builds upon version 2.2.0 published in last year's JIB Standards in Systems Biology special issue. In particular, SBOL 2.3.0 includes means of succinctly representing sequence modifications, such as insertion, deletion, and replacement, an extension to support organization and attachment of experimental data derived from designs, and an extension for describing numerical parameters of design elements. The new version also includes specifying types of synthetic biology activities, unambiguous locations for sequences with multiple encodings, refinement of a number of validation rules, improved figures and examples, and clarification on a number of issues related to the use of external ontology terms.
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
26. Synthetic Biology Open Language Visual (SBOL Visual) Version 2.1.
- Author
-
Madsen C, Goni Moreno A, Palchick Z, P U, Roehner N, Bartley B, Bhatia S, Bhakta S, Bissell M, Clancy K, Cox RS, Gorochowski T, Grunberg R, Luna A, McLaughlin J, Nguyen T, Le Novere N, Pocock M, Sauro H, Scott-Brown J, Sexton JT, Stan GB, Tabor JJ, Voigt CA, Zundel Z, Myers C, Beal J, and Wipat A
- Subjects
- Models, Biological, Programming Languages, Synthetic Biology
- Abstract
People who are engineering biological organisms often find it useful to communicate in diagrams, both about the structure of the nucleic acid sequences that they are engineering and about the functional relationships between sequence features and other molecular species . Some typical practices and conventions have begun to emerge for such diagrams. The Synthetic Biology Open Language Visual (SBOL Visual) has been developed as a standard for organizing and systematizing such conventions in order to produce a coherent language for expressing the structure and function of genetic designs. This document details version 2.1 of SBOL Visual, which builds on the prior SBOL Visual 2.0 standard by expanding diagram syntax to include methods for showing modular structure and mappings between elements of a system, interactions arrows that can split or join (with the glyph at the split or join indicating either superposition or a chemical process), and adding new glyphs for indicating genomic context (e.g., integration into a plasmid or genome) and for stop codons.
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
27. Synthetic Biology Open Language (SBOL) Version 2.2.0.
- Author
-
Cox RS, Madsen C, McLaughlin JA, Nguyen T, Roehner N, Bartley B, Beal J, Bissell M, Choi K, Clancy K, Grünberg R, Macklin C, Misirli G, Oberortner E, Pocock M, Samineni M, Zhang M, Zhang Z, Zundel Z, Gennari JH, Myers C, Sauro H, and Wipat A
- Subjects
- Animals, Guidelines as Topic, Humans, Signal Transduction, Models, Biological, Programming Languages, Software, Synthetic Biology standards
- Abstract
Synthetic biology builds upon the techniques and successes of genetics, molecular biology, and metabolic engineering by applying engineering principles to the design of biological systems. The field still faces substantial challenges, including long development times, high rates of failure, and poor reproducibility. One method to ameliorate these problems would be to improve the exchange of information about designed systems between laboratories. The synthetic biology open language (SBOL) has been developed as a standard to support the specification and exchange of biological design information in synthetic biology, filling a need not satisfied by other pre-existing standards. This document details version 2.2.0 of SBOL that builds upon version 2.1.0 published in last year's JIB special issue. In particular, SBOL 2.2.0 includes improved description and validation rules for genetic design provenance, an extension to support combinatorial genetic designs, a new class to add non-SBOL data as attachments, a new class for genetic design implementations, and a description of a methodology to describe the entire design-build-test-learn cycle within the SBOL data model.
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
28. Synthetic Biology Open Language Visual (SBOL Visual) Version 2.0.
- Author
-
Cox RS, Madsen C, McLaughlin J, Nguyen T, Roehner N, Bartley B, Bhatia S, Bissell M, Clancy K, Gorochowski T, Grünberg R, Luna A, Le Novère N, Pocock M, Sauro H, Sexton JT, Stan GB, Tabor JJ, Voigt CA, Zundel Z, Myers C, Beal J, and Wipat A
- Subjects
- Animals, Guidelines as Topic, Humans, Signal Transduction, Computer Graphics standards, Models, Biological, Programming Languages, Software, Synthetic Biology standards
- Abstract
People who are engineering biological organisms often find it useful to communicate in diagrams, both about the structure of the nucleic acid sequences that they are engineering and about the functional relationships between sequence features and other molecular species. Some typical practices and conventions have begun to emerge for such diagrams. The Synthetic Biology Open Language Visual (SBOL Visual) has been developed as a standard for organizing and systematizing such conventions in order to produce a coherent language for expressing the structure and function of genetic designs. This document details version 2.0 of SBOL Visual, which builds on the prior SBOL Visual 1.0 standard by expanding diagram syntax to include functional interactions and molecular species, making the relationship between diagrams and the SBOL data model explicit, supporting families of symbol variants, clarifying a number of requirements and best practices, and significantly expanding the collection of diagram glyphs.
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
29. Synthetic Biology Open Language (SBOL) Version 2.1.0.
- Author
-
Beal J, Cox RS, Grünberg R, McLaughlin J, Nguyen T, Bartley B, Bissell M, Choi K, Clancy K, Macklin C, Madsen C, Misirli G, Oberortner E, Pocock M, Roehner N, Samineni M, Zhang M, Zhang Z, Zundel Z, Gennari J, Myers C, Sauro H, and Wipat A
- Subjects
- Programming Languages, Synthetic Biology
- Abstract
Synthetic biology builds upon the techniques and successes of genetics, molecular biology, and metabolic engineering by applying engineering principles to the design of biological systems. The field still faces substantial challenges, including long development times, high rates of failure, and poor reproducibility. One method to ameliorate these problems would be to improve the exchange of information about designed systems between laboratories. The Synthetic Biology Open Language (SBOL) has been developed as a standard to support the specification and exchange of biological design information in synthetic biology, filling a need not satisfied by other pre-existing standards. This document details version 2.1 of SBOL that builds upon version 2.0 published in last year’s JIB special issue. In particular, SBOL 2.1 includes improved rules for what constitutes a valid SBOL document, new role fields to simplify the expression of sequence features and how components are used in context, and new best practices descriptions to improve the exchange of basic sequence topology information and the description of genetic design provenance, as well as miscellaneous other minor improvements.
- Published
- 2016
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
30. Data Integration and Mining for Synthetic Biology Design.
- Author
-
Mısırlı G, Hallinan J, Pocock M, Lord P, McLaughlin JA, Sauro H, and Wipat A
- Subjects
- Bacillus subtilis genetics, Bacillus subtilis metabolism, Computational Biology, DNA, Bacterial genetics, Knowledge Bases, Promoter Regions, Genetic, Sequence Analysis, DNA, Software, Data Mining, Databases, Genetic, Synthetic Biology
- Abstract
One aim of synthetic biologists is to create novel and predictable biological systems from simpler modular parts. This approach is currently hampered by a lack of well-defined and characterized parts and devices. However, there is a wealth of existing biological information, which can be used to identify and characterize biological parts, and their design constraints in the literature and numerous biological databases. However, this information is spread among these databases in many different formats. New computational approaches are required to make this information available in an integrated format that is more amenable to data mining. A tried and tested approach to this problem is to map disparate data sources into a single data set, with common syntax and semantics, to produce a data warehouse or knowledge base. Ontologies have been used extensively in the life sciences, providing this common syntax and semantics as a model for a given biological domain, in a fashion that is amenable to computational analysis and reasoning. Here, we present an ontology for applications in synthetic biology design, SyBiOnt, which facilitates the modeling of information about biological parts and their relationships. SyBiOnt was used to create the SyBiOntKB knowledge base, incorporating and building upon existing life sciences ontologies and standards. The reasoning capabilities of ontologies were then applied to automate the mining of biological parts from this knowledge base. We propose that this approach will be useful to speed up synthetic biology design and ultimately help facilitate the automation of the biological engineering life cycle.
- Published
- 2016
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
31. Synthetic Biology Open Language (SBOL) Version 2.0.0.
- Author
-
Bartley B, Beal J, Clancy K, Misirli G, Roehner N, Oberortner E, Pocock M, Bissell M, Madsen C, Nguyen T, Zhang Z, Gennari JH, Myers C, Wipat A, and Sauro H
- Subjects
- Animals, Biological Ontologies, Datasets as Topic standards, Documentation standards, Guidelines as Topic standards, Humans, Information Storage and Retrieval standards, Internationality, Computer Graphics standards, Models, Biological, Programming Languages, Proteome metabolism, Signal Transduction physiology, Synthetic Biology standards
- Abstract
Synthetic biology builds upon the techniques and successes of genetics, molecular biology, and metabolic engineering by applying engineering principles to the design of biological systems. The field still faces substantial challenges, including long development times, high rates of failure, and poor reproducibility. One method to ameliorate these problems would be to improve the exchange of information about designed systems between laboratories. The Synthetic Biology Open Language (SBOL) has been developed as a standard to support the specification and exchange of biological design information in synthetic biology, filling a need not satisfied by other pre-existing standards. This document details version 2.0 of SBOL, introducing a standardized format for the electronic exchange of information on the structural and functional aspects of biological designs. The standard has been designed to support the explicit and unambiguous description of biological designs by means of a well defined data model. The standard also includes rules and best practices on how to use this data model and populate it with relevant design details. The publication of this specification is intended to make these capabilities more widely accessible to potential developers and users in the synthetic biology community and beyond.
- Published
- 2015
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
32. Proposed data model for the next version of the synthetic biology open language.
- Author
-
Roehner N, Oberortner E, Pocock M, Beal J, Clancy K, Madsen C, Misirli G, Wipat A, Sauro H, and Myers CJ
- Subjects
- Animals, Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats, Computer Simulation, Cricetinae, Genetic Engineering, Models, Genetic, Programming Languages, Replicon genetics, Software, Models, Biological, Synthetic Biology statistics & numerical data
- Abstract
While the first version of the Synthetic Biology Open Language (SBOL) has been adopted by several academic and commercial genetic design automation (GDA) software tools, it only covers a limited number of the requirements for a standardized exchange format for synthetic biology. In particular, SBOL Version 1.1 is capable of representing DNA components and their hierarchical composition via sequence annotations. This proposal revises SBOL Version 1.1, enabling the representation of a wider range of components with and without sequences, including RNA components, protein components, small molecules, and molecular complexes. It also introduces modules to instantiate groups of components on the basis of their shared function and assert molecular interactions between components. By increasing the range of structural and functional descriptions in SBOL and allowing for their composition, the proposed improvements enable SBOL to represent and facilitate the exchange of a broader class of genetic designs.
- Published
- 2015
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
33. Synthetic biology: How best to build a cell.
- Author
-
Collins JJ, Maxon M, Ellington A, Fussenegger M, Weiss R, and Sauro H
- Subjects
- Animals, Automation methods, Biological Evolution, Biomimetics, Biotechnology economics, Biotechnology trends, Cell Engineering methods, Green Chemistry Technology, Mammals, Metabolic Engineering, Synthetic Biology economics, Workforce, Synthetic Biology methods, Synthetic Biology trends
- Published
- 2014
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
34. The Systems Biology Graphical Notation.
- Author
-
Le Novère N, Hucka M, Mi H, Moodie S, Schreiber F, Sorokin A, Demir E, Wegner K, Aladjem MI, Wimalaratne SM, Bergman FT, Gauges R, Ghazal P, Kawaji H, Li L, Matsuoka Y, Villéger A, Boyd SE, Calzone L, Courtot M, Dogrusoz U, Freeman TC, Funahashi A, Ghosh S, Jouraku A, Kim S, Kolpakov F, Luna A, Sahle S, Schmidt E, Watterson S, Wu G, Goryanin I, Kell DB, Sander C, Sauro H, Snoep JL, Kohn K, and Kitano H
- Subjects
- History, 20th Century, Internet, Computer Graphics history, Software, Systems Biology history
- Abstract
Circuit diagrams and Unified Modeling Language diagrams are just two examples of standard visual languages that help accelerate work by promoting regularity, removing ambiguity and enabling software tool support for communication of complex information. Ironically, despite having one of the highest ratios of graphical to textual information, biology still lacks standard graphical notations. The recent deluge of biological knowledge makes addressing this deficit a pressing concern. Toward this goal, we present the Systems Biology Graphical Notation (SBGN), a visual language developed by a community of biochemists, modelers and computer scientists. SBGN consists of three complementary languages: process diagram, entity relationship diagram and activity flow diagram. Together they enable scientists to represent networks of biochemical interactions in a standard, unambiguous way. We believe that SBGN will foster efficient and accurate representation, visualization, storage, exchange and reuse of information on all kinds of biological knowledge, from gene regulation, to metabolism, to cellular signaling.
- Published
- 2009
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
35. Mathematical modeling and synthetic biology.
- Author
-
Chandran D, Copeland WB, Sleight SC, and Sauro HM
- Abstract
Synthetic biology is an engineering discipline that builds on our mechanistic understanding of molecular biology to program microbes to carry out new functions. Such predictable manipulation of a cell requires modeling and experimental techniques to work together. The modeling component of synthetic biology allows one to design biological circuits and analyze its expected behavior. The experimental component merges models with real systems by providing quantitative data and sets of available biological 'parts' that can be used to construct circuits. Sufficient progress has been made in the combined use of modeling and experimental methods, which reinforces the idea of being able to use engineered microbes as a technological platform.
- Published
- 2008
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
36. BioModels Database: a free, centralized database of curated, published, quantitative kinetic models of biochemical and cellular systems.
- Author
-
Le Novère N, Bornstein B, Broicher A, Courtot M, Donizelli M, Dharuri H, Li L, Sauro H, Schilstra M, Shapiro B, Snoep JL, and Hucka M
- Subjects
- Genes, Internet, Kinetics, User-Computer Interface, Vocabulary, Controlled, Biochemical Phenomena, Cell Physiological Phenomena, Databases, Factual, Models, Biological
- Abstract
BioModels Database (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/biomodels/), part of the international initiative BioModels.net, provides access to published, peer-reviewed, quantitative models of biochemical and cellular systems. Each model is carefully curated to verify that it corresponds to the reference publication and gives the proper numerical results. Curators also annotate the components of the models with terms from controlled vocabularies and links to other relevant data resources. This allows the users to search accurately for the models they need. The models can currently be retrieved in the SBML format, and import/export facilities are being developed to extend the spectrum of formats supported by the resource.
- Published
- 2006
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
37. Minimum information requested in the annotation of biochemical models (MIRIAM).
- Author
-
Le Novère N, Finney A, Hucka M, Bhalla US, Campagne F, Collado-Vides J, Crampin EJ, Halstead M, Klipp E, Mendes P, Nielsen P, Sauro H, Shapiro B, Snoep JL, Spence HD, and Wanner BL
- Subjects
- Biochemistry standards, Cell Physiological Phenomena, Guidelines as Topic, Information Dissemination methods, Information Storage and Retrieval standards, Biochemistry methods, Databases, Factual, Documentation methods, Documentation standards, Information Storage and Retrieval methods, Models, Biological, Terminology as Topic
- Abstract
Most of the published quantitative models in biology are lost for the community because they are either not made available or they are insufficiently characterized to allow them to be reused. The lack of a standard description format, lack of stringent reviewing and authors' carelessness are the main causes for incomplete model descriptions. With today's increased interest in detailed biochemical models, it is necessary to define a minimum quality standard for the encoding of those models. We propose a set of rules for curating quantitative models of biological systems. These rules define procedures for encoding and annotating models represented in machine-readable form. We believe their application will enable users to (i) have confidence that curated models are an accurate reflection of their associated reference descriptions, (ii) search collections of curated models with precision, (iii) quickly identify the biological phenomena that a given curated model or model constituent represents and (iv) facilitate model reuse and composition into large subcellular models.
- Published
- 2005
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
38. The ERATO Systems Biology Workbench: enabling interaction and exchange between software tools for computational biology.
- Author
-
Hucka M, Finney A, Sauro HM, Bolouri H, Doyle J, and Kitano H
- Subjects
- Computer Simulation, Computer Systems, Programming Languages, Software, Stochastic Processes, User-Computer Interface, Computational Biology methods, Computer Communication Networks
- Abstract
Researchers in computational biology today make use of a large number of different software packages for modeling, analysis, and data manipulation and visualization. In this paper, we describe the ERATO Systems Biology Workbench (SBW), a software framework that allows these heterogeneous application components--written in diverse programming languages and running on different platforms--to communicate and use each others' data and algorithmic capabilities. Our goal is to create a simple, open-source software infrastructure which is effective, easy to implement and easy to understand. SBW uses a broker-based architecture and enables applications (potentially running on separate, distributed computers) to communicate via a simple network protocol. The interfaces to the system are encapsulated in client-side libraries that we provide for different programming languages. We describe the SBW architecture and the current set of modules, as well as alternative implementation technologies.
- Published
- 2002
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
39. Elasticities in Metabolic Control Analysis: algebraic derivation of simplified expressions.
- Author
-
Woods JH and Sauro HM
- Subjects
- Allosteric Regulation, Enzymes metabolism, Kinetics, Mathematics, Software, Algorithms, Metabolism, Models, Biological
- Abstract
Motivation: Metabolic Control Analysis is one of many disciplines that make use of scaled derivatives. In particular, 'elasticities' are used to quantify the effect of an effector or substrate concentration on an enzyme rate under locally specified conditions. Normally an algebraic expression for the elasticity of an enzyme is obtained by differentiating its rate law, multiplying by the effector concentration and dividing by the rate law itself: this results in considerable expression expansion, and when the results are subsequently simplified it is often at the expense of biological comprehensibility., Results: We present a novel algorithm which not only circumvents the expression expansion, but preserves an elegant separation of the components in enzyme behaviour. Easily implemented, and producing gains in both performance and numerical precision, the algorithm is potentially applicable to a number of existing packages. It also greatly assists the manual derivation and evaluation of elasticities, allowing the elasticity of even quite complex enzyme systems to be written by inspection.
- Published
- 1997
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
40. In vitro control analysis of an enzyme system: experimental and analytical developments.
- Author
-
Sauro HM and Barrett J
- Subjects
- Kinetics, Monte Carlo Method, Regression Analysis, Reproducibility of Results, Spectrophotometry, L-Lactate Dehydrogenase analysis, NAD chemistry
- Abstract
In this paper we describe a flow-through system for reconstituting parts of metabolism from purified enzymes. This involves pumping continuously into a reaction chamber, fresh enzymes and reagents so that metabolic reactions occur in the chamber. The waste products leave the chamber via the outflow so that a steady state can be setup. The system we chose consisted of a single enzyme, lactate dehydrogenase. This enzyme was chosen because it consumes NADH in the chamber which could be monitored spectrophotometrically. The aim of the work was to investigate whether a steady state could be achieved in the flow system and whether a metabolic control analysis could be done. We measured two control coefficients, CLDH and Cpump for the enzyme flux and NADH concentration and confirmed that the summation theorem applied to this system. The advantage of a flow-through system is that the titrations necessary to estimate the control coefficients can be easily and precisely controlled; this means that accurate estimates for the control coefficients can be obtained. In the paper, we discuss some statistical aspects of the data analysis and some possible applications of the technique, including a method to determine the presence of metabolic channelling between two different enzymes.
- Published
- 1995
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
41. Coenzyme cycles and metabolic control analysis: the determination of the elasticity coefficients from the generalised connectivity theorem.
- Author
-
Kholodenko BN, Sauro HM, Westerhoff HV, and Cascante M
- Subjects
- Coenzymes metabolism, Elasticity, Enzymes metabolism, Kinetics, Mathematics, Thermodynamics, Coenzymes pharmacology, Enzymes chemistry
- Abstract
Metabolic control analysis allows one to express the elasticity coefficients (which describe the "local" kinetic features of enzymes) in terms of the control coefficients (quantitative indicators of the "global" control properties). However, when coenzymes (or metabolites linked by conservation constraints) are present in the pathway this procedure yields the "apparent" values of elasticity coefficients that correspond to the kinetic responses of the enzymes to such a simultaneous change of the coenzyme forms which leaves the total concentration of these forms unchanged (e.g., NAD+ + NADH in the glycolysis). We show that a generalised connectivity theorem (Kholodenko et al, Eur. J. Biochem. (1994) 225, 179-186) makes it possible to express the elasticity coefficients with respect to every coenzyme form separately. Such expressions include (i) the control coefficients and (ii) the responses to changes in the total concentrations of the coenzymes.
- Published
- 1995
42. Control by enzymes, coenzymes and conserved moieties. A generalisation of the connectivity theorem of metabolic control analysis.
- Author
-
Kholodenko BN, Sauro HM, and Westerhoff HV
- Subjects
- Homeostasis, Kinetics, Coenzymes metabolism, Enzymes metabolism, Metabolism, Models, Biological, Models, Theoretical
- Abstract
The control and regulation of metabolic systems are determined by their responses to changes in the internal metabolites (the internal state) and parameters of the system. In many cases, the concentrations of the intermediates are constrained by moiety conservations, for example those requiring that all intermediate forms of any enzyme sum to the conserved total concentration of that enzyme. In this study, we show how responses to changes in the internal state are related to responses to changes in the total amounts of conserved moieties. The relationship between these two different measures of control leads to a generalisation of the connectivity theorems. The results have important implications for the study of a variety of phenomena such as metabolite (coenzyme) sequestration, group-transfer and channelling. The relationships we derive make it possible to determine the control features of these pathways. As an illustration, two examples are chosen. The first shows the effect of sequestration of substrate moiety while the second deals with the sequestration of the enzyme moieties and enzyme/enzyme interactions.
- Published
- 1994
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
43. SCAMP: a general-purpose simulator and metabolic control analysis program.
- Author
-
Sauro HM
- Subjects
- Algorithms, Computer Simulation, Metabolism, Models, Biological, Software
- Abstract
SCAMP is a general-purpose simulator of metabolic and chemical networks. The program is written in C and is portable to all computer systems that support an ANSI C compiler. SCAMP accepts metabolic models described in a biochemical language, and this enables novice as well as experienced users rapidly to build and simulate metabolic systems. The language is sufficiently flexible to enable other types of model to be built, e.g. chemostat or ecological models. The language offers many facilities, including: the ability to describe metabolic pathways of any structure and possessing any kinetics using normal chemical notation; optionally build models directly from the differential equations; differing compartment volumes; access to flux, concentration and rate of change information; detection of conserved cycles; access to all coefficients and elasticities of metabolic control analysis; user-defined forcing functions at the model boundaries; user-defined monitoring functions; user-configurable output of any quantity. From the model description SCAMP can either generate C code for later compilation to produce fast executable stand-alone models or run-time code for input to a run-time interpreter for immediate execution. The simulator also incorporates an inbuilt symbolic differentiator for evaluating the Jacobian and elasticity matrices.
- Published
- 1993
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
44. Metabolic control analysis. The effects of high enzyme concentrations.
- Author
-
Fell DA and Sauro HM
- Subjects
- Kinetics, Mathematical Computing, Models, Biological, Enzymes metabolism
- Abstract
Differing views have been given in the literature as to whether the presence in a pathway of an enzyme at a concentration comparable to that of its substrate affects the values of control coefficients and the theorems of metabolic control analysis. Here we argue in favour of one of those views: that there is no effect unless the enzyme sequesters a substrate that contains a conserved moiety. In this particular case, we derive both a general criterion for estimating whether such an effect will be of a significant magnitude, and equations for determining the changes in the flux control coefficients. The nature of the phenomenom and the application of the equations are illustrated with a numerical simulation.
- Published
- 1990
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
45. Enzyme-enzyme interactions and control analysis. 1. The case of non-additivity: monomer-oligomer associations.
- Author
-
Kacser H, Sauro HM, and Acerenza L
- Subjects
- Catalysis, Kinetics, Protein Binding, Enzymes metabolism, Mathematics, Models, Theoretical
- Abstract
Two usual assumptions of the treatment of metabolism are: (a) the rates of isolated enzyme reactions are additive, i.e., that rate is proportional to enzyme concentration; (b) in a system, the rates of individual enzyme reactions are not influenced by interactions with other enzymes, i.e. that they are acting independently, except by being coupled through shared metabolites. On this basis, control analysis has established theorems and experimental methods for studying the distribution of control. These assumptions are not universally true and it is shown that the theorems can be modified to take account of such deviations. This is achieved by defining additional elasticity coefficients, designated by the symbol pi, which quantify the effects of homologous and heterologous enzyme interactions. Here we show that for the case of non-proportionality of rate with enzyme concentration, (pi ii not equal to 1), the summation theorems are given by (Formula: see text). The example of monomer-oligomer equilibria is used to illustrate non-additive behaviour and experimental methods for their study are suggested.
- Published
- 1990
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
46. Enzyme-enzyme interactions and control analysis. 2. The case of non-independence: heterologous associations.
- Author
-
Sauro HM and Kacser H
- Subjects
- Catalysis, Kinetics, Enzymes metabolism, Mathematics, Models, Theoretical, Multienzyme Complexes metabolism
- Abstract
The association of different enzymes into a complex may induce changes in the kinetic parameters of its component enzymes. This implies that they cannot be treated as independent catalysts. It will affect the formulations and theorems of control analysis and necessitates the introduction of additional elasticities reflecting the effect of one enzyme on the rate of another. We show how this is achieved as an extension of the classical treatment. We present modified summation and connectivity theorems incorporating both homologous and heterologous interactions. The case of channelling of metabolites in such complexes is considered and an experimental method for its detection is suggested.
- Published
- 1990
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
47. Metabolic control analysis by computer: progress and prospects.
- Author
-
Fell DA and Sauro HM
- Subjects
- Algorithms, Electronic Data Processing, Metabolism
- Abstract
In metabolic control analysis, the set of rules called the matrix method simplifies writing the matrix equation that relates the control coefficients to elasticities of enzymes, and a subset of the velocities and substrate concentrations in a metabolic system. However, since the process of writing and solving these equations can be clearly defined, a computer program is being produced that will write the equations for the control coefficients given only the reactions of the metabolic system. In this way, the results of metabolic control analysis can be made available to all those who can use them, even if they do not know the theory in detail. The computational strategies underlying such a program, and the similarities to a biochemical simulation program developed previously are described.
- Published
- 1990
48. Metabolic control and its analysis. Additional relationships between elasticities and control coefficients.
- Author
-
Fell DA and Sauro HM
- Subjects
- Biological Transport, Catalysis, Elasticity, Enzymes, Kinetics, Mathematics, Substrate Specificity, Terminology as Topic, Metabolism, Models, Chemical
- Abstract
Existing theorems from the analysis of metabolic control have been taken and embedded in a simple matrix algebra procedure for calculating the flux control coefficients of enzymes (formerly known as sensitivities) in a metabolic pathway from their kinetic properties (their elasticities). New theorems governing the flux control coefficients of branched pathways and substrate cycles have been derived to allow the procedure to be applied to complex pathway configurations. Modifications to the elasticity terms used in the equations have been theoretically justified so that the method remains valid for pathways with conserved metabolites (for example, the adenine nucleotide pool or the intermediates of a catalytic cycle such as the tricarboxylic acid cycle) or with pools of metabolites kept very near to equilibrium by very rapid reactions. The matrix equations generated using these theorems and relationships may be solved algebraically or numerically. Algebraic solutions have been used to determine the factors responsible for the degree of amplification of flux control coefficients by substrate cycles and to show that it is possible to derive expressions for the elasticities of a group of enzymes.
- Published
- 1985
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
49. Metabolic control and its analysis. Extensions to the theory and matrix method.
- Author
-
Sauro HM, Small JR, and Fell DA
- Subjects
- Kinetics, Mathematics, Enzymes metabolism, Metabolism, Models, Biological
- Abstract
The matrix algebra procedure for determining the flux control coefficients of enzymes in metabolic pathways has been extended to allow determination of the concentration control coefficients. Although it is shown that the procedure is essentially unchanged in most cases, the presence of moiety-conserved cycles in a pathway places additional limitations on the form of the equations that can be used in the matrix formulation for concentration control coefficients. In the case of branched pathways, a new coefficient has been defined, the branch distribution control coefficient, which can be obtained via the matrix procedure. Thus a single matrix equation permits calculation or algebraic evaluation of the control coefficients for flux, concentration and distribution of flux at branches, so that the complete response of a pathway to alteration of enzyme content, or to modulation by an effector, can be determined. The relationships have been determined between flux control coefficients in isolated sections of metabolic pathways and the coefficients for the same enzymes when part of a larger metabolic system. It is shown that the control analysis of the isolated system provides useful information towards determining the control properties of the extended system.
- Published
- 1987
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
50. Control analysis of time-dependent metabolic systems.
- Author
-
Acerenza L, Sauro HM, and Kacser H
- Subjects
- Elasticity, Mathematics, Time Factors, Metabolism, Models, Biological
- Abstract
Metabolic Control Analysis is extended to time dependent systems. It is assumed that the time derivative of the metabolite concentrations can be written as a linear combination of rate laws, each one of first order with respect to the corresponding enzyme concentration. The definitions of the control and elasticity coefficients are extended, and a new type of coefficient ("time coefficient", "T") is defined. First, we prove that simultaneous changes in all enzyme concentrations by the same arbitrary factor, is equivalent to a change in the time scale. When infinitesimal changes are considered, these arguments lead to the derivation of general summation theorems that link control and time coefficients. The comparison of two systems with identical rates, that only differ in one metabolite concentration, leads to a method for the construction of general connectivity theorems, that relate control and elasticity coefficients. A mathematical proof in matrix form, of the summation and connectivity relationships, for time dependent systems is given. Those relationships allow one to express the control coefficients in terms of the elasticity and time coefficients for the case of unbranched pathway.
- Published
- 1989
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.