Search

Objective: Treatment of high-grade serous ovarian carcinomas relies on surgery and chemotherapy, potentially followed by bevacizumab and/or poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi). The modeled CA-125 ELIMination rate constant K (KELIM) is a pragmatic indicator of tumor primary chemosensitivity. Although it is well established that BRCA mutations are associated with platinum sensitivity, the relationship between BRCA status and KELIM score has yet to be elucidated. This study aimed to evaluate the interactions between BRCA and KELIM, and their respective prognostic values., Methods: We retrospectively collected data from 743 patients with high-grade serous ovarian carcinomas included in a French nationwide registry (NCT03275298) treated with neoadjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy followed by surgery. We analyzed the interactions between BRCA and KELIM, and their impacts on progression-free survival and overall survival., Results: BRCA -mutated (BRCA m) patients had higher standardized KELIM than BRCA -wild type ( BRCA wt) tumors (median 1.16 vs 1.06, respectively; p=0.001). The prognostic value of the KELIM score was independent of BRCA in multivariate analyses. KELIM score and BRCA could be combined to define three prognostic groups: (1) an unfavorable prognostic group with both BRCA wt and unfavorable KELIM (median progression-free survival 12.0 months); (2) an intermediate prognostic group with either BRCA m and unfavorable KELIM, or BRCA wt and favorable KELIM (median progression-free survival of 16.0 and 18.8 months, respectively; HR 0.64 compared with the unfavorable group, p<0.001); and (3) a favorable prognostic group with both BRCA m and favorable KELIM (median progression-free survival 28.8 months; HR 0.37 compared with the unfavorable group, p<0.001)., Conclusions: The KELIM score provides complementary prognostic information with respect to BRCA, and discriminates different prognoses within BRCA m or BRCA wt patients. Patients with both BRCA wt/unfavorable KELIM have a poor prognosis, underscoring the urgent need for novel therapeutic strategies., Competing Interests: Competing interests: J-MC: reports personal fees from AstraZeneca, Roche, Vifor, Clovis, GlaxoSmithKline, and Merck Sharp and Dohme, outside the submitted work. LC: reports non-financial support from Pharmamar and GSK, outside the submitted work. P-EC: reports personal fees from Merck Sharp and Dohme, AstraZeneca, and GlaxoSmithKline, outside the submitted work. AD: reports non-financial support from Monaco Age Oncologie, outside the submitted work. TMR: reports personal fees from Pfizer, AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, Clovis Oncology, Roche, Merck Sharp and Dohme, Mylan, Tesaro, and Norvartis; grants from Pfizer, Merck Sharp and Dohme, and Seagen; a non-financial advisory role for the French National Cancer Institute, Arcagy, and Unicancer, outside the submitted work. LG: reports personal fees from Viatris, Roche, Merck Sharp and Dohme, Clovis, GlaxoSmithKline, and AstraZeneca, outside the submitted work. FJ: reports personal fees from Amgen, Astellas, AstraZeneca, Byaer, EISAI, GlaxoSmithKline, Ipsen, Janssen, Merck Sharp and Dohme, Novartis, Novocure, Pfizer, Seagen, and Viatris; non-financial support from Astellas, AstraZeneca, Bristol-Meyer Squibb, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Merck Sharp and Dohme, Ipsen, EISAI, and Chugai, outside the submitted work. EL: reports personal fees from Strycker, outside the submitted work. PP: reports personal fees from GlaxoSmithKline, Merck Sharp and Dohme, PharmaMar, and Roche, outside the submitted work. CP: reports personal fees from Roche, GlaxoSmithKline, Pharmamar, and Merck Sharp and Dohme, outside the submitted work. RS: reports grants from AstraZeneca; personal fees from GlaxoSmithKline, EISAI, Seagen, and Novartis; non-financial support from Merck Sharp and Dohme, GlaxoSmithKline, and Novartis, outside the submitted work. IR-C: reports personal fees from Agenus, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Clovis, Deciphera, GlaxoSmithKline, Macrogenics, Merck Sereno, Mersena, Novartis, Oxnea, Roche, Bristol-Meyer Squibb, and Merck Sharp and Dohme, outside the submitted work. MR: reports non-financial support from AstraZeneca; grants from Merck Sharp and Dohme, Daiichi Sankyo, and Bristol-Meyer Squibb; personal fees from AstraZeneca, Immunocore, Merck Sharp and Dohme, and GlaxoSmithKline, outside the submitted work. BY: reports personal fees from Merck Sharp and Dohme, AstraZeneca, GSK-TESARO, Bayer, Roche-Genentech, ECS Progastrine, Novartis, LEK, Amgen, Clovis Oncology, Merck Serono, Bristol-Meyer Squibb, Seagen, Myriad, Menarini, Gilead, and EISAI, outside the submitted work. EB, OB, LB, MCa, MCh, OC, HC, CG, FM, TP, BS, and A-MS have nothing to disclose., (© IGCS and ESGO 2024. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

PD-1/PD-L1 blockade has so far shown limited survival benefit for high-grade ovarian carcinomas. By using paired samples from the NeoPembrOv randomized phase II trial (NCT03275506), for which primary outcomes are published, and by combining RNA-seq and multiplexed immunofluorescence staining, we explore the impact of NeoAdjuvant ChemoTherapy (NACT) ± Pembrolizumab (P) on the tumor environment, and identify parameters that correlated with response to immunotherapy as a pre-planned exploratory analysis. Indeed, i) combination therapy results in a significant increase in intraepithelial CD8 + PD-1 + T cells, ii) combining endothelial and monocyte gene signatures with the CD8B/FOXP3 expression ratio is predictive of response to NACT + P with an area under the curve of 0.93 (95% CI 0.85-1.00) and iii) high CD8B/FOXP3 and high CD8B/ENTPD1 ratios are significantly associated with positive response to NACT + P, while KDR and VEGFR2 expression are associated with resistance. These results indicate that targeting regulatory T cells and endothelial cells, especially VEGFR2 + endothelial cells, could overcome immune resistance of ovarian cancers., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

This open-label, non-comparative, 2:1 randomized, phase II trial (NCT03275506) in women with stage IIIC/IV high-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC) for whom upfront complete resection was unachievable assessed whether adding pembrolizumab (200 mg every 3 weeks) to standard-of-care carboplatin plus paclitaxel yielded a complete resection rate (CRR) of at least 50%. Postoperatively patients continued assigned treatment for a maximum of 2 years. Postoperative bevacizumab was optional. The primary endpoint was independently assessed CRR at interval debulking surgery. Secondary endpoints were Completeness of Cytoreduction Index (CCI) and peritoneal cancer index (PCI) scores, objective and best response rates, progression-free survival, overall survival, safety, postoperative morbidity, and pathological complete response. The CRR in 61 pembrolizumab-treated patients was 74% (one-sided 95% CI = 63%), exceeding the prespecified ≥50% threshold and meeting the primary objective. The CRR without pembrolizumab was 70% (one-sided 95% CI = 54%). In the remaining patients CCI scores were ≥3 in 27% of the standard-of-care group and 18% of the investigational group and CC1 in 3% of the investigational group. PCI score decreased by a mean of 9.6 in the standard-of-care group and 10.2 in the investigational group. Objective response rates were 60% and 72%, respectively, and best overall response rates were 83% and 90%, respectively. Progression-free survival was similar with the two regimens (median 20.8 versus 19.4 months in the standard-of-care versus investigational arms, respectively) but overall survival favored pembrolizumab-containing therapy (median 35.3 versus 49.8 months, respectively). The most common grade ≥3 adverse events with pembrolizumab-containing therapy were anemia during neoadjuvant therapy and infection/fever postoperatively. Pembrolizumab was discontinued prematurely because of adverse events in 23% of pembrolizumab-treated patients. Combining pembrolizumab with neoadjuvant chemotherapy is feasible for HGSC considered not completely resectable; observed activity in some subgroups justifies further evaluation to improve understanding of the role of immunotherapy in HGSC., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Importance: In ERBB2 (formerly HER2)-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC), combining trastuzumab and pertuzumab with taxane-based chemotherapy is the first line of standard care. Given that trastuzumab plus pertuzumab was proven effective in ERBB2-positive MBC, even without chemotherapy, whether the optimal first-line strategy could be trastuzumab plus pertuzumab alone instead of with chemotherapy is unresolved., Objective: To assess overall survival (OS) at 2 years and progression-free survival (PFS) for patients randomly assigned to receive first-line pertuzumab plus trastuzumab alone or with chemotherapy followed by trastuzumab and emtansine at progression; PFS of second-line trastuzumab and emtansine treatment following trastuzumab plus pertuzumab; and OS and PFS in the ERBB2-enriched and ERBB2-nonenriched subtypes., Design, Setting, and Participants: This was a secondary analysis of a multicenter, open-label, phase 2 randomized clinical trial conducted at 27 sites in France, 20 sites in Switzerland, 9 sites in the Netherlands, and 1 site in Germany. Overall, 210 patients with centrally confirmed ERBB2-positive MBC were randomized between May 3, 2013, and January 4, 2016, with termination of the trial May 26, 2020. Data were analyzed from December 18, 2020, to May 10, 2022., Interventions: Patients randomly received pertuzumab (840 mg intravenously [IV], then 420 mg IV every 3 weeks) plus trastuzumab (8 mg/kg IV, then 6 mg/kg IV every 3 weeks) without chemotherapy (group A) or pertuzumab plus trastuzumab (same doses) with either paclitaxel (90 mg/m2 for days 1, 8, and 15, then every 4 weeks for ≥4 months) or vinorelbine tartrate (25 mg/m2 for first administration followed by 30 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 and every 3 weeks for ≥4 months) followed by pertuzumab plus trastuzumab maintenance after chemotherapy discontinuation (group B)., Main Outcomes and Measures: Overall survival at 24 months by treatment group, PFS for first-line treatment, PFS for second-line treatment, and patient-reported quality of life (QOL)., Results: A total of 210 patients were included in the analysis, with a median age of 58 (range, 26-85) years. For group A, 24-month OS was 79.0% (90% CI, 71.4%-85.4%); for group B, 78.1% (90% CI, 70.4%-84.5%). Median PFS with first-line treatment was 8.4 (95% CI, 7.9-12.0) months in group A and 23.3 (95% CI, 18.9-33.1) months in group B. Unlike expectations, OS and PFS did not markedly differ between populations with ERBB2-enriched and ERBB2-nonenriched cancer. Adverse events were less common without chemotherapy, with small QOL improvements from baseline in group A and stable QOL in group B., Conclusions and Relevance: The findings of this secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial suggest that the chemotherapy-free anti-ERBB2 strategy is feasible without being detrimental in terms of OS. The 50-gene prediction analysis of microarray signature could not help to identify the most appropriate patient population for this approach., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01835236.

In patients with advanced ovarian cancer (AOC) receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC), predicting the feasibility of complete interval cytoreductive surgery (ICRS) is helpful and may avoid unnecessary laparotomy. A joint model (JM) is a dynamic individual predictive model. The aim of this study was to develop a predictive JM combining CA-125 kinetics during NAC with patients' and clinical factors to predict resectability after NAC in patients with AOC. A retrospective study included 77 patients with AOC treated with NAC. A linear mixed effect (LME) sub-model was used to describe the evolution of CA-125 during NAC considering factors influencing the biomarker levels. A Cox sub-model screened the covariates associated with resectability. The JM combined the LME sub-model with the Cox sub-model. Using the LME sub-model, we observed that CA-125 levels were influenced by the number of NAC cycles and the performance of paracentesis. In the Cox sub-model, complete resectability was associated with Performance Status (HR = 0.57, [0.34-0.95], p = 0.03) and the presence of peritoneal carcinomatosis in the epigastric region (HR = 0.39, [0.19-0.80], p = 0.01). The JM accuracy to predict complete ICRS was 88% [82-100] with a predictive error of 2.24% [0-2.32]. Using a JM of a longitudinal CA-125 level during NAC could be a reliable predictor of complete ICRS.

Background: In spite of the frequency and clinical impact of BRCA1/2 alterations in high-grade epithelial ovarian cancer (HGEOC), real-world information based on robust data warehouse has been scarce to date., Methods: Consecutive patients with BRCA -mutated HGEOC treated between 2011 and 2016 within French comprehensive cancer centers from the Unicancer network were extracted from the ESME database. The main objective of the study was the assessment of clinicopathological and treatments parameters., Results: Out of the 8021 patients included in the ESME database, 266 patients matching the selection criteria were included. BRCA1 mutation was found in 191 (71.8%) patients, while 75 (28.2%) had a BRCA2 mutation only; 95.5% of patients received a cytoreductive surgery. All patients received a taxane/platinum-based chemotherapy (median = six cycles). Complete and partial response were obtained in 53.3% and 20.4% of the cases, respectively. Maintenance therapy was administered in 55.3% of the cases, bevacizumab being the most common agent. After a median follow up of 51.7 months, a median progression-free survival of 28.6 months (95% confidence interval (CI) [26.5; 32.7]) and an estimated 5-year median overall survival of 69.2% (95% CI [61.6; 70.3]) were reported. Notably, BRCA1 - and BRCA2 -mutated cases exhibited a trend towards different median progression-free survivals, with 28.0 (95% CI [24.4; 32.3]) and 33.3 months (95% CI [26.7; 46.1]), respectively ( p -value = 0.053). Furthermore, five-year OS for BRCA1 -mutated patients was 64.5% (95% CI [59.7; 69.2]), while it was 82.5% (95% CI [76.6; 88.5]) for BRCA2 -mutated ones ( p -value = 0.029)., Conclusions: This study reports the largest French multicenter cohort of BRCA -mutated HGEOCs based on robust data from the ESME, exhibiting relevant real-world data regarding this specific population.

Objective: Emotional competence (EC) is considered a substantial resource in the adjustment of cancer patients, especially via its effect on anxiety and depression symptoms. This research aimed at assessing the impact of intrapersonal EC in young women (≤45 years) with breast cancer (YWBC) on their specific quality of life (i.e. subjective experience related to daily difficulties and perceived repercussions of the disease and treatments) related to chemotherapy, via anxiety and depression symptoms., Methods: Two hundred fifty YWBC from 24 French centers completed a self-reported questionnaire after diagnosis (T1) and after the chemotherapy phase (T2), comprising the Young Women Breast Cancer Inventory, the Profile of EC and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. The indirect effect of EC (T1) on subjective experience (T2) via anxiety and depression symptoms (T2) was tested using regressions and the Macro PROCESS., Results: Emotional competence predicted fewer anxiety and depression symptoms at T1 and T2, and a better subjective experience at T2 via fewer anxiety and depression symptoms. Depression symptoms appeared to be a stronger mediator than anxiety symptoms on four dimensions (Support from close relatives, feeling of couple cohesion, body image and sexuality, management of children and everyday life), whereas anxiety symptoms appeared to be a stronger mediator on two dimensions (negative affectivity and apprehension about the future, deterioration of relationships)., Conclusions: These results support the importance of developing psycho-affective interventions to reinforce the EC of YWBC during chemotherapy in order to facilitate the cognitive and emotional processes necessary for a better adjustment and subjective experience., (© 2022 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of regorafenib versus tamoxifen in platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer biological recurrence, defined by CA-125 increase without radiological (RECIST criteria) or symptomatic evidence of progression., Patients and Methods: 116 patients with platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer presenting an isolated increase of CA-125 were planned to be randomized. Regorafenib was administered orally at 160 or 120 mg daily, 3 weeks on/1 week off or tamoxifen at 40 mg daily, until disease progression or development of unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was Progression-Free Survival, assessed by progression according to RECIST 1.1 or death (by any cause). Secondary endpoints included Overall Survival, Best Response and CA-125 response rate., Results: 68 patients were randomized. Median age was 67 years (range: 30-87). Primary site of cancer was ovarian for most patients (92.6%). Tumors were predominantly serous / (89.7%), high grade (83.6%) and initial FIGO staging was III for 69.6% of the patients. Most (79.4%) patients were included after the first line of platinum-based treatment. After a median follow-up of 32 months, there was no difference of progression-free survival (PFS) between regorafenib and tamoxifen groups (p = 0.72), with median PFS of 5.6 months (CI 90%: 3.84-7.52) for the tamoxifen arm and 4.6 months (CI 90%: 3.65-7.33) for the regorafenib arm. There was also no difference in term of overall survival, best response or CA-125 response, delay to next therapy. Regorafenib presented a less favorable safety profile than tamoxifen, with grade 3/4 events occurring for 90.9% of the patients compared to 54.3% for tamoxifen. The most frequent were cutaneous, digestive, and biological events. Notably, hand-foot syndrome occurred in 36.4% of these patients., Conclusion: Regorafenib presented an unfavorable toxicity profile compared to tamoxifen, with no superior efficacy in this population of patients., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest Dr. Trédan reports supports from the present manuscripts to ARCAGY GINECO from Bayer HealthCare, grants or contracts from Roche, BMS and MSD-Merck (payments to his institution), consulting fees from Roche, Pfizer, Astra-Zeneca, Lilly, Novartis-Sandoz, Daiichi-Sankyo, Seagen Pierre Fabre, MSD-Merck, Eisai (payments to him), payments/honoraria from Roche, Pfizer, Astra-Zeneca, Lilly, Novartis-Sandoz, Daiichi-Sankyo, Seagen, Pierre Fabre, MSD-Merck, Eisai, support for attending meeting and/or travel from Roche, Astra-Zeneca, Pfizer (payments to him). Dr. Hardy-Bessard reports payment/honoraria from MSD, Astra-Zeneca, GSK and participation on data safety monitoring board/advisory board with Clovis, MSD, Astra-Zeneca, GSK, Novartis, Pfizer. Dr. Lortholary reports payment/honoraria from Astra-Zeneca, Roche, MSD, Clovis, Novartis, support for attending meetings/travel from Roche and Astra-Zeneca and participation in a Data Safety Monitoring Board/Advisory board with Astra-Zeneca, Roche, MSD, Clovis and Novartis. Dr. Frenel reports payments/honoraria from Astra Zeneca, Lilly, Daiichi, Pfizer, Amgen, support for attending meetings/travel from Pfizer and Astra Zeneca, and participation on a Data Safety Monitoring Board/advisory board from Pfizer, Lilly, Novartis, GSK, Astra-Zeneca, MSD, Roche and Clovis. Dr. Louvet reports payments/honoraria from Merck, Roche, Servier and Amgen and support for attending meetings/travels from Roche and Merck. Dr. You reports consulting fees from MSD, Astra-Zeneca, GSK, Bayer, Roche, ECS Progastrine, Novartis, LEK, Amgen, Clovis, Merck Serono, BMS, Seagen. Amélie Anota reports consulting fees from Roche, Astra-Zeneca, Sandoz, Pfizer/Hospira, payment or honoraria for lectures from Astra-Zeneca and BMS and support for attending meetings/travels from Roche, Astra-Zeneca and Novartis. Pr Ray-Coquard reports consulting fees from Amgen, Astra-Zeneca, Clovis Oncology, Genmab, GSK, ImmunoGen, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Pfizer/Merck-Sereno, PharmaMar, and Roche, grants/contracts with Roche, BMS, MSD, GSK Company and support for attending meetings/travels from Astra-Zeneca, Roche, GSK and Clovis. The remaining authors declare no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Germ cell tumors and sex cord stromal tumors are rare cancers of the ovary. They mainly affect young women and are associated with a high survival rate. The standard treatment mainly involves conservative surgery combined with chemotherapy [bleomycin, etoposide and cisplatin (BEP)] depending on the stage and the prognostic factors, as for testicular cancers. As reported in testicular cancer survivors, chemotherapy may induce sequelae impacting quality of life, which has not yet been evaluated in survivors of germ cell tumors and sex cord stromal tumors. The GINECO-VIVROVAIRE-Rare tumor study is a two-step investigation aiming to assess i) chronic fatigue and quality of life and ii) long-term side-effects of chemotherapy with a focus on cardiovascular and pulmonary disorders., Methods: Using self-reported questionnaires, chronic fatigue and quality of life are compared between 134 ovarian cancer survivors (cancer-free ≥2 years after treatment) treated with surgery and chemotherapy and 2 control groups (67 ovarian cancer survivors treated with surgery alone and 67 age-matched healthy women). Medical data are collected from patient records. In the second step evaluating the long-term side-effects of chemotherapy, a subgroup of 90 patients treated with chemotherapy and 45 controls undergo the following work-up: cardiovascular evaluation (clinical examination, non-invasive cardiovascular tests to explore heart disease, blood tests), pulmonary function testing, audiogram, metabolic and hormonal blood tests. Costs of sequelae will be also assessed. Patients are selected from the registry of the INCa French Network for Rare Malignant Ovarian Tumors, and healthy women by the 'Seintinelles' connected network (collaborative research platform)., Discussion: This study will provide important data on the potential long-term physical side-effects of chemotherapy in survivors of Germ Cell Tumors (GCT) and Sex Cord Stromal Tumors (SCST), especially cardiovascular and pulmonary disorders, and neurotoxicity. The identification of long-term side-effects can contribute to adjusting the treatment of ovarian GCT or SCST patients and to managing follow-up with adapted recommendations regarding practices and chemotherapy regimens, in order to reduce toxicity while maintaining efficacy. Based on the results, intervention strategies could be proposed to improve the management of these patients during their treatment and in the long term., Trial Registration: This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov : 03418844 , on 1 February 2018. This trial was registered on 25 October 2017 under the unique European identification number (ID-RCB): 2017-A03028-45. Recruitment Status: Recruiting., Protocol Version: Version n° 4.2 dated from Feb 19, 2021., Trial Sponsor: Centre François Baclesse, 3 avenue du Général Harris, F-14076 Caen cedex 05, France., (© 2021. The Author(s).)

Background: Prognostic significance of endometrioid epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is controversial. We compared clinical, pathological, and biological features of patients with endometrioid and serous EOC, and assessed the independent effect of histology on outcomes., Methods: We conducted a multicenter retrospective analysis of patients with EOC selected from the French Epidemiological Strategy and Medical Economics OC database between 2011 and 2016. Our main objective was to compare overall survival (OS) in endometrioid and serous tumors of all grades. Our second objectives were progression-free survival (PFS) and prognostic features., Results: Out of 10,263 patients included, 3180 cases with a confirmed diagnosis of serous (N = 2854) or endometrioid (N = 326) EOC were selected. Patients with endometrioid histology were younger, more often diagnosed at an early stage, with lower-grade tumors, more frequently dMMR/MSI-high, and presented more personal/familial histories of Lynch syndrome-associated cancers. BRCA1/2 mutations were more frequently identified in the serous population. Endometrioid patients were less likely to receive chemotherapy, with less bevacizumab. After median follow-up of 51.7 months (95CI[50.1-53.6]), five-year OS rate was 81% (95CI[74-85]) in the endometrioid subgroup vs. 55% (95CI[53-57] in the serous subset (p < 0.001, log-rank test). In multivariate analyses including [age, ECOG-PS, FIGO, grade, and histology], the endometrioid subtype was independently associated with better OS (HR = 0.38, 95CI[0.20-0.70], p= 0.002) and PFS (HR = 0.53, 95CI[0.37-0.75], p < 0.001)., Conclusions: Clinicopathological features at diagnosis are not the same for endometrioid and serous EOC. Endometrioid histology is an independent prognosis factor in EOC. These observations suggest the endometrioid population requires dedicated clinical trials and management., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest All the authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest to disclose related to this work., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Bevacizumab-containing therapy is considered a standard-of-care front-line option for stage IIIB-IV ovarian cancer based on results of randomized phase 3 trials. The multicenter non-interventional ENCOURAGE prospective cohort study assessed treatment administration and outcomes in the French real-world setting. Patients and Methods: Eligible patients were aged ≥ 18 years with planned bevacizumab-containing therapy for newly diagnosed ovarian cancer. The primary objective was to assess the safety profile of front-line bevacizumab in routine clinical practice; secondary objectives were to describe patient characteristics, indications/contraindications for bevacizumab, treatment regimens and co-medications, follow-up and monitoring, progression-free survival, and treatment at recurrence. In this non-interventional study, treatment was administered as chosen by the investigator and participation in the trial had no influence on the management of the disease. Results: Of 1,290 patients screened between April 2013 and February 2015, 468 were eligible. Most patients (86%) received bevacizumab 15 mg/kg every 3 weeks or equivalent, typically with carboplatin (99%) and paclitaxel (98%). The median duration of bevacizumab was 12.2 (range 0-28, interquartile range 6.9-14.9) months; 8% of patients discontinued bevacizumab because of toxicity. The most common adverse events were hypertension (38% of patients), fatigue (35%), and bleeding (32%). There were no treatment-related deaths. Most physicians (90%) reported blood pressure measurement immediately before each bevacizumab infusion and almost all (97%) reported monitoring for proteinuria before each bevacizumab infusion. Median progression-free survival was 17.4 (95% CI, 16.4-19.1) months. The 3-year overall survival rate was 62% (95% CI, 58-67%). The most commonly administered chemotherapies at recurrence were carboplatin and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin. Discussion: Clinical outcomes and tolerability with bevacizumab in this real-life setting are consistent with randomized trial results, notwithstanding differences in the treated patient population and treatment schedule. Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, Identifier NCT01832415., Competing Interests: AF reports honoraria and travel/accommodation/expenses from AstraZeneca, Clovis, and GSK, and non-remunerated activities for MSD and Roche. PT reports honoraria from MSD, Tesaro/GSK, and Pfizer, and advisory/consultancy roles for MSD and Tesaro/GSK. JA reports honoraria from GSK, AstraZeneca, MSD, PharmaMar, and Eisai; travel/accommodation/expenses from Novartis, Janssen, and GSK; and research grant/funding to his institution from Janssen and MSD. CG-T reports honoraria from and advisory/consultancy roles for Pfizer; speaker bureau/expert testimony for AstraZeneca and MSD; travel/accommodation/expenses from MSD, Pfizer, and Mylan; and research grant/funding to her institution from Roche. PF reports honoraria from and advisory/consultancy roles for Novartis, AstraZeneca, GSK, and Clovis, and travel/accommodation/expenses from Novartis, AstraZeneca, and GSK. CBL reports honoraria (paid to his institution) from Roche, Novartis, Isofol, Array Biopharma, AstraZeneca, BMS, and Celgene. FS reports honoraria from Roche, AstraZeneca, Tesaro, Clovis, MSD, PharmaMar, and GlaxoSmithKline; advisory/consultancy role for Roche; speaker bureau/expert testimony for Roche, AstraZeneca, Tesaro, and GlaxoSmithKline; and travel/accommodation/expenses from Roche, AstraZeneca, Tesaro, MSD, and PharmaMar. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2021 Berton, Floquet, Lescaut, Baron, Kaminsky, Toussaint, Largillier, Savoye, Alexandre, Delbaldo, Malaurie, Barletta, Bosacki, Garnier-Tixidre, Follana, Laharie-Mineur, Briac Levache, Valenza, Dechartres, Mollon-Grange and Selle.)

Importance: Single-agent carboplatin is often proposed instead of a conventional carboplatin-paclitaxel doublet in vulnerable older patients with ovarian cancer. Such an approach could have a detrimental effect on outcomes for these patients., Objective: To compare the feasibility, efficacy, and safety of single-agent carboplatin every 3 weeks, weekly carboplatin-paclitaxel, or conventional every-3-weeks carboplatin-paclitaxel in vulnerable older patients with ovarian cancer., Design, Setting, and Participants: This international, open-label, 3-arm randomized clinical trial screened 447 women 70 years and older with newly diagnosed stage III/IV ovarian cancer by determining their Geriatric Vulnerability Score; 120 patients with a Geriatric Vulnerability Score of 3 or higher were stratified by country and surgical outcome. Enrollment took place at 48 academic centers in France, Italy, Finland, Denmark, Sweden, and Canada from December 11, 2013, to April 26, 2017. Final analysis database lock April 2019. Data analysis was performed from February 1 to December 31, 2019., Interventions: Patients were randomized to receive 6 cycles of (1) carboplatin, area under the curve (AUC) 5 mg/mL·min, plus paclitaxel, 175 mg/m2, every 3 weeks; (2) single-agent carboplatin, AUC 5 mg/mL·min or AUC 6 mg/mL·min, every 3 weeks; or (3) weekly carboplatin, AUC 2 mg/mL·min, plus paclitaxel, 60 mg/m2, on days 1, 8, and 15 every 4 weeks., Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was treatment feasibility, defined as the ability to complete 6 chemotherapy cycles without disease progression, premature toxic effects-related treatment discontinuation, or death., Results: A total of 120 women were randomized. The mean and median age was 80 (interquartile range, 76-83; range, 70-94) years; 43 (36%) had a Geriatric Vulnerability Score of 4 and 13 (11%) had a Geriatric Vulnerability Score of 5; 40 (33%) had stage IV disease. During its third meeting, the independent data monitoring committee's recommendation led to the termination of the trial because single-agent carboplatin was associated with significantly worse survival. Six cycles were completed in 26 of 40 (65%), 19 of 40 (48%), and 24 of 40 (60%) patients in the every-3-weeks combination, single-agent carboplatin, and weekly combination groups, respectively. Treatment-related adverse events were less common with the standard every-3-weeks combination (17 of 40 [43%]) than single-agent carboplatin or weekly combination therapy (both 23 of 40 [58%]). Treatment-related deaths occurred in 4 patients (2 of 40 [5%] in each combination group)., Conclusions and Relevance: This randomized clinical trial shows that compared with every-3-weeks or weekly carboplatin-paclitaxel regimens, single-agent carboplatin was less active with significantly worse survival outcomes in vulnerable older patients with ovarian cancer., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02001272.

Objective: In young women, EOC is a rare disease with an uncertain genetic and biological substrate., Methods: We report a long follow-up of EOC patients treated at Gustave Roussy between 1990 and 2009. We matched young patients aged ≤30 years to randomly selected older patients aged ≥40 years according to known prognostic factors (i.e. FIGO stage, histology and surgical residual disease) and the date of diagnosis with a threshold at the year 2000 to balance the treatment procedures., Results: EOC was diagnosed in 68 patients aged ≤30 years matched with 111 patients aged ≥40 years. Low-grade (LG) (i.e. serous and endometrioid) (52%, n = 35) and mucinous (i.e. 23%, n = 16 infiltrative and 12% n = 8 expansile) tumors are prevalent. High-grade (HG) tumors are rare (7%, n = 5). Early stage diseases (53%, n = 36 FIGO I/II) are predominant. Response to platinum based chemotherapy is observed to be inferior in young patients as compared to matched older patients (ORR, 29 vs 84% p = 0.0002). For HG tumors the PFS is of 0% at 5 and 10 years in younger as compared to 30% in older patients. No difference in PFS (median 4.9 vs 9.8 ms, p = 0.58) and OS (not reached vs 15.3 ms, p = 0.47) is found overall among younger and older patients respectively. The median follow-up was 72 months (range, 11-288 months). No genetic abnormalities were found., Conclusions: Young EOC patients are most often diagnosed at an early FIGO stage with LG serous or mucinous histology. Tumors are significantly more resistant to platinum-based chemotherapy in younger patients., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest Dr. Pautier reports support from Roche, Astra Zeneca, non-financial support from MSD, Clovis, GSK, outside the submitted work. Dr. Leary reports support from Tesaro, Clovis, Astra Zeneca, MSD, Merck Serono, Seattle Genetics, Gridstone, Biocad, Ability, Gamamabs and grants from Merus, Gamamabs, Sanofi, Inivata. Drs Michels, Genestie, Dunant, Caron, Colomba, Pommeret, Rey, Gouy, Duvillard, Le Teuff, Savoye, Lhommé, Morice report no conflict of interest. All authors contributed equally to this practice statement., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Combining bevacizumab with paclitaxel significantly improves progression-free survival (PFS) versus paclitaxel alone in HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Eribulin is active and tolerable in pretreated MBC. To assess whether eribulin may offer a more tolerable yet effective combination partner for bevacizumab, we evaluated a bevacizumab/eribulin combination regimen as first-line therapy for MBC., Methods: In this single-arm phase II study, patients with histologically confirmed HER2-negative MBC and no prior chemotherapy for MBC received eribulin 1.23 mg/m 2 on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks for ≥6 cycles plus bevacizumab 15 mg/kg on day 1 every 3 weeks until disease progression. The primary endpoint was non-progression rate at 1 year. Secondary endpoints included objective response rate (ORR), PFS, and safety., Results: The median age of the 61 treated female patients was 59 years, 16% had triple-negative MBC, 30% had ≥3 metastatic sites, and 71% had received prior (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy. Patients received a median of six eribulin and nine bevacizumab cycles. The non-progression rate at 1 year was 32% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 20-43%), ORR was 47% (95% CI: 34-60%), and median PFS was 8.3 months (95% CI: 7.0-9.6 months). The only grade ≥3 clinical adverse events in >5% of patients were hypertension (39%), neutropenia (26%), thrombosis (10%), and paresthesia/dysesthesia (7%)., Conclusion: First-line eribulin/bevacizumab combination therapy showed interesting activity in MBC with an acceptable safety profile, including a particularly low incidence of high-grade neuropathy., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest FC reports grants, personal fees, and non-financial support from AstraZeneca, grants from Roche Diagnostics, and personal fees and non-financial support from Roche and Lilly, outside the submitted work. BY reports consulting/advisory roles for AstraZeneca and advisory boards for Roche, GSK/Tesaro, Clovis, Novartis, MSD, BMS, Amgen, and ECS Progastrin, all outside the submitted work. GE reports personal fees and research support from Roche and Novartis, personal fees from Pfizer and Amgen, and research support from MSD, Odonate, Dompé Farmaceutici, AstraZeneca, and MacroGenics, outside the submitted work. A–CH–B, FB, AL, JG, JM-B, BL, JM, J-MF, A-MS, AMa, RD, and IM have nothing to disclose., (Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Background: Few data are available on long-term fatigue (LTF) and quality of life (QoL) among epithelial ovarian cancer survivors (EOCS). In this case-control study, we compared LTF, symptoms and several QoL domains in EOCS relapse-free ≥3 years after first-line treatment and age-matched healthy women., Patients and Methods: EOCS were recruited from 25 cooperative GINECO centers in France. Controls were randomly selected from the electoral rolls. All participants completed validated self-reported questionnaires: fatigue (FACIT-F), QoL (FACT-G/O), neurotoxicity (FACT-Ntx), anxiety/depression (HADS), sleep disturbance (ISI), and physical activity (IPAQ). Severe LTF (SLTF) was defined as a FACIT-F score <37/52. Univariate and multivariate logistic regressions were conducted to analyze SLTF and its influencing factors in EOCS., Results: A total of 318 EOCS and 318 controls were included. EOCS were 63-year-old on average, with FIGO stage I/II (50%), III/IV (48%); 99% had received platinum and taxane chemotherapy, with an average 6-year follow-up. There were no differences between the two groups in socio-demographic characteristics and global QoL. EOCS had poorer FACIT-F scores (40 versus 45, P < 0.0001), lower functional well-being scores (18 versus 20, P = 0.0002), poorer FACT-O scores (31 versus 34 P < 0.0001), and poorer FACT-Ntx scores (35 versus 39, P < 0.0001). They also reported more SLTF (26% versus 13%, P = 0.0004), poorer sleep quality (63% versus 47%, P = 0.0003), and more depression (22% versus 13%, P = 0.01). Fewer than 20% of EOCS and controls exercised regularly. In multivariate analyses, EOCS with high levels of depression, neurotoxicity, and sleep disturbance had an increased risk of developing SLTF (P < 0.01)., Conclusion: Compared with controls, EOCS presented similar QoL but persistent LTF, EOC-related symptoms, neurotoxicity, depression, and sleep disturbance. Depression, neuropathy, and sleep disturbance are the main conditions associated with severe LTF., (© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society for Medical Oncology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Background: Young patients with breast cancer treated with chemotherapy can experience ovarian failure, which can lead to chemotherapy-induced menopause (CIM) impacting the quality of life (QoL). A prospective study was set out to evaluate the impact of CIM on QoL in women of childbearing age with non-metastatic breast cancer, and this article reports results of the interim analysis conducted to evaluate feasibility and to see preliminary results., Patients and Methods: A total of 58 women (age, 18-46 years) with newly diagnosed breast cancer and treated with chemotherapy were eligible. QoL was assessed by self-administered questionnaires (Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 [QLQ-C30], Quality of Life Questionnaire-Breast 23 [QLQ-BR23], and Kupperman index) and hormonal variations (anti-Müllerian hormone [AMH], follicle-stimulating hormone, and estradiol) were explored. We compared patients with ≥ 12 months amenorrhea (CIM) (n = 41) to patients with < 12 months of amenorrhea (non-CIM) (n = 17)., Results: A good inclusion rate (approximately 4/month) and sufficient data enabled us to perform this analysis. QLQ-C30 failed to show any difference between CIM and non-CIM patients (P = .5). In contrast, at 6 months post-chemotherapy, CIM patients tended to have lower QoL as shown by QLQ-BR23 (P = .16) and more severe climacteric symptoms (P = .01). Regarding hormonal variations, AMH pre-treatment level was higher in non-CIM patients (P = .0032). We also noted that CIM patients were older (P = .00013), had shorter menstruation cycle (P = .082), and experienced faster amenorrhea (P = .088)., Conclusions: The study is technically feasible, and our preliminary results underline that age in association with pre-treatment AMH level could be helpful to predict ovarian function. QLQ-BR23 seemed to be stronger, more precise, and appropriate to evaluate QoL changes in patients with breast cancer than the QLQ-C30., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The everolimus-exemestane combination is indicated in advanced breast cancer treatment and usually well tolerated. The objective of the study was to determine the frequency of everolimus lung side effects and investigate their imaging characteristics on positron emission tomography with 18F-fluoro-deoxy-glucose combined with computerized tomography (F-FDG PET/CT).Our single-center retrospective descriptive study systematically included all patients with metastatic breast cancer treated by this combination (n = 29 representing 57 F-FDG PET/CT). Number of segments involved was quantified. Maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), average standardized uptake value (SUVmean), metabolic target volume (MTV), and total lesion glycolysis (TLG) were measured. Severe pneumopathy was studied by subgroup analysis.Pleuroparenchymal anomalies rate detected on F-FDG PET/CT was 62%. Alveolar-interstitial lesions were mainly observed (89%) and affected 2.8 segments (0.5-11.5) with a median of 2 segments. S7 and S10 were the most involved segments with SUVmax 3.9 (1.3-8.8) and SUVmean 2.2 (0.7-4.9). Statistically significant difference (P = .02) was found with number of segment involved to characterize severe pneumopathy (average of 6.3 segments [2.5-11.5] vs 1.9 segments [0.5-8] for interstitial lung disease) but not with SUVmax, SUVmean, MTV, TLG (P = .14, 0.22, 0.22, and 0.17, respectively).The F-FDG PET/CT could highlight pulmonary everolimus side effects, with a typical imaging pattern: alveolar-interstitial opacities associated with moderate uptake, more or less extensive, mainly affecting the lower lobes. Rarely, a pseudotumoral aspect may be detected, corresponding to a pitfall. MTV or TLG showed a tendency to differentiate severe pneumopathy vs interstitial lung disease but no statistically significant differences was observed contrarily to the number of segments involved. Further studies are necessary to determine if the F-FDG PET/CT could early predict adverse effects of mTOR inhibitors.

Background: Neoadjuvant treatment provides a unique opportunity to evaluate individual tumor sensitivity. This study evaluated whether a response-guided strategy could improve clinical outcome compared with a standard treatment., Methods: Overall, 264 previously untreated stage II-III operable breast cancer patients were randomized to receive either standard treatment (arm A, n = 131), consisting of fluorouracil, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide (FEC100: 500, 100, and 500 mg/m(2), respectively, for 3 cycles) followed by docetaxel (100 mg/m(2) for 3 cycles), or adapted treatment (arm B, n = 133), beginning with 2 cycles of FEC100 and switching to docetaxel if tumor size decreased by <30% after 2 cycles or <50% after 4 cycles of FEC100 (ultrasound assessments according to World Health Organization criteria). Otherwise, FEC100 was given for six cycles before surgery. Intent-to-treat analysis was performed., Results: Similar results were observed for clinical response (objective response was 54% vs 56%, p = .18), breast conservation surgery (BCS; 67% vs 68%, p = .97), and pathological complete response rate (Chevallier classification: 14% vs 11%, p = .68; Statloff classification: 16% vs 13%, p = .82) between arms A and B. Similar toxicities were observed, even with unbalanced numbers of FEC100 and docetaxel courses., Conclusion: Adapted and standard treatments had similar results in terms of tumor response, BCS rate, and tolerability. Further survival outcome data are expected., (©AlphaMed Press; the data published online to support this summary is the property of the authors.)

Aims. The differences between the 2007 and the 2013 ASCO/CAP HER2 guidelines have been compared. We also discussed the potential consequences in our pathological practice. Material and Methodology. 189 HER2 fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) tests were performed from 1016 preliminary HER2 immunohistochemical tests (IHC). All cases were reviewed and reclassed following the 2007 and 2013 ASCO/CAP recommendations. Results. The 2013 version decreased false-negative IHC (3/118 versus 1/54, P = ns) and created more 2+ IHC (40/186 versus 89/186, P = 0.001) or more 3+ IHC (9/186 versus 39/186, P = 0.001). One false-positive IHC was described for the 2013 version (0/9 versus 1/39, P = ns). Equivocal FISH was reduced (8/186 versus 2/186, P = ns). An estimation based on our data for 1000 patients showed a rise of our FISH tests for the control of 2+ IHC (180 tests for the 2007 version versus 274 tests for the 2013 version or FISH work overflow is +52%) and for the control of 2+/3+ IHC (300 for the 2007 version versus 475 for the 2013 version or FISH work overflow is +58%). Conclusions. The new 2013 ASCO/CAP guidelines have detected more HER2 positive cases but have increased the number of FISH tests.

The proinflammatory cytokine Interleukin 17A (hereafter named IL-17A) or IL-17A producing cells are elevated in breast tumors environment and correlate with poor prognosis. Increased IL-17A is associated with ER(-) or triple negative tumors and reduced Disease Free Survival. However, the pathophysiological role of IL-17A in breast cancer remains unclear although several studies suggested its involvement in cancer cell dissemination. Here we demonstrated that a subset of breast tumors is infiltrated with IL-17A-producing cells. Increased IL-17A seems mainly associated to ER(-) and triple negative/basal-like tumors. Isolation of tumor infiltrating T lymphocytes (TILs) from breast cancer biopsies revealed that these cells secreted significant amounts of IL-17A. We further established that recombinant IL-17A recruits the MAPK pathway by upregulating phosphorylated ERK1/2 in human breast cancer cell lines thereby promoting proliferation and resistance to conventional chemotherapeutic agents such as docetaxel. We also confirmed here that recombinant IL-17A stimulates migration and invasion of breast cancer cells as previously reported. Importantly, TILs also induced tumor cell proliferation, chemoresistance and migration and treatment with IL-17A-neutralizing antibodies abrogated these effects. Altogether these results demonstrated the pathophysiological role of IL-17A-producing cell infiltrate in a subset of breast cancers. Therefore, IL-17A appears as potential therapeutic target for breast cancer.

Background: Two previous GINECO elderly specific studies in advanced ovarian cancer (AOC) patients highlighted the prognostic value of geriatric covariates for overall survival (OS)., Patients and Methods: This open-label prospective trial was designed to identify the impact of geriatric covariates on OS in AOC patients ≥70 years treated with first-line carboplatin., Results: Geriatric covariates of the 111 patients included median age 79 years (≥80 years: 41%); performance status (PS) ≥2: 47%; ≥3 major comorbidities: 24%; ≥4 comedications: 68%; activities of daily living (ADL) score <6: 55%; instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) score <25: 69%; Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) >14: 37%. The median OS was 17.4 months. Overall, 74% of patients completed the six planned chemotherapy cycles. Grade 3-4 haematological toxic effects were frequent (50%) but manageable. Grade 3-4 non-haematological toxicities included fatigue (15%), anorexia (12%), infections (9%) and thrombosis (2%). A survival score = exp(0.327*GVS) was developed, where the geriatric vulnerability score (GVS) is the sum of the following (each assigned a value of one): albuminaemia <35 g/l; ADL score <6; IADL score <25; lymphopaenia <1 G/l; and HADS >14. With a cut-off ≥3, GVS discriminated two groups with significantly different OS, treatment completion, severe adverse events and unplanned hospital admissions rates., Conclusions: The GVS is a valuable tool for identifying vulnerable patients when treating an elderly AOC population.

Ocular metastasis of breast cancer has become more frequent since therapy increases patients' survival. It is therefore important to recall this diagnosis. We report the case of a 73-year-old patient who had orbital metastases of an unknown breast cancer. The commonest clinical sign at diagnosis is exophthalmia. Prognosis is usually pejorative once diagnosis is performed. Standard treatment is radiotherapy and requires a multidisciplinary approach., (Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)