Search

The main aim of this study was to evaluate the correlation between the effectiveness of olaparib in the maintenance setting and the number of previous chemotherapy lines received for the treatment of BRCA-mutated platinum-sensitive relapsed ovarian cancer (OC). This was a regional, multicentric, retrospective, and observational study, designed to collect data from medical charts of patients treated between June 2015 and October 2018. At data lock, 43 patients were evaluated for the study. Patients with 1-2 previous lines of platinum-based chemotherapy showed a higher response rate to olaparib, compared to those with 3-4 or more previous lines. No difference in terms of progression-free survival (PFS) was observed between the two groups; 40.5% of patients experienced a G3-4 adverse event, while no significant difference was observed between the two groups in terms of G3-4 toxicities. This is the first Italian study evaluating the use of olaparib in the "real-world" treatment of OC patients, offering a preliminary but useful picture of current clinical practice in Puglia region. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: With the availability of multiple treatment options for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), new real-world data on disease management and drugs' performance are needed., Methods: We described characteristics, management and clinical outcomes of patients receiving first-line mCRPC treatment within the Italian cohort of the real-world, prospective, international Prostate Cancer Registry. Patients were enrolled consecutively (2013-2016) in 32 Italian sites and followed for 3 years., Results: 238 patients were included: 157 received first-line abiraterone acetate plus prednisone ("abiraterone" thereafter) and 70 first-line docetaxel; 11 patients receiving other treatments were not considered. Compared with docetaxel-treated patients, those receiving abiraterone were significantly older (age ⩾75: 63.7% vs 38.6%), less frequently had a Gleason score >8 (48.2% vs 67.6%, p<0.005) at initial diagnosis, and more frequently an ECOG score ⩾1 (52.7% vs 36.2%, p<0.05) and comorbidities (76.4% vs 57.1%, p<0.05) at baseline; they reported a lower analgesic use (15.3% vs 30%, p<0.005). In the abiraterone group (median follow-up 22.1 months), median time to progression (TTP) and progression-free survival (PFS) were, respectively, 14.4 months (95% confidence interval, CI, 10.6-18.0) and 13.0 months (95% CI, 9.1-16.8); median overall survival (OS) was not reached, and 3-year OS was 59.1%. In the docetaxel treatment group (median follow-up 25.3 months), median TTP, PFS and OS were, respectively, 8.2 months (95% CI, 6.1-10.3), 8.2 months (95% CI, 5.8-10.3) and 33.2 months (95% CI, 19.2-not estimable)., Conclusion: This investigation provided valuable information on the overall mCRPC treatment pattern and the effectiveness of first-line abiraterone and docetaxel in a population representative of everyday practice.

Background: Chemotherapy plus targeted therapy is the established treatment for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-overexpressing breast cancer (BC). Limited data regarding the safety and activity of the combination of eribulin and trastuzumab (E/T) in pretreated HER2-positive advanced BC (ABC) are available. The aim of this observational, retrospective, multicenter study was to examine the tolerability and the clinical activity of E/T in this setting., Methods: Patients treated with eribulin mesylate plus standard dose of trastuzumab were included. Data on overall response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety were reported., Results: Between October 2012 and November 2015, 24 consecutive patients with HER2-positive ABC were included. All patients were heavily pretreated: the median number of prior chemotherapy regimens for ABC was 3 (range 2-9). The median number of cycles with E/T was 11.5 (range 2-26). The ORR was 41.7%. Median PFS was 5.4 months, median postprogression survival was 5.4 months, and median OS was 8 months. Neutropenia was the most common grade 3/4 clinical adverse event (16.7%)., Conclusions: Tolerability and clinical activity of the E/T combination schedule are encouraging. The results of this study indicate that this combination might be considered for treatment of pretreated HER2 ABC.

Background: Different studies suggest that fulvestrant 500 mg every 28 days (HD-FUL) could be an active treatment in HR+ advanced breast cancer (ABC) patients even treated with aromatase inhibitors in the adjuvant setting. The aim of this analysis is to describe the outcome of ABC patients treated with HD-FUL as first-line treatment in terms of median duration of treatment and the overall response rate in a real-world setting., Methods: For the purpose of the present analysis, we considered two data sets of HR+ ABC patients collected in Italy between 2012 and 2015 (EVA and GIM-13 AMBRA studies)., Results: Eighty-one and 91 patients have been identified from the two data sets. The median age was 63 years (range 35-82) for the EVA and 57.8 years (range 35.0-82.3) for the AMBRA patients. ORRs were 23.5 and 24.3% in the whole population, 26.9% in the patients with bone only, and 21.8 and 21.4% in those with visceral metastases. The median duration of HD-FUL was 11.6 months (range 1-48) and 12.4 months (range 2.9-70.0) in the two data sets, respectively., Conclusion: These data suggest that HD-FUL should still continue to play a significant role as first-line therapy in HR+ ABC patients., Competing Interests: The Authors declare that they have no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2019 by S. Karger AG, Basel.)

Background: This multi-institutional retrospective real life study was conducted in 22 Italian Oncology Centers and evaluated the role of Axitinib in second line treatment in not selected mRCC patients., Methods: 148 mRCC patients were evaluated. According to Heng score 15.5%, 60.1% and 24.4% of patients were at poor risk, intermediate and favorable risk, respectively., Results: PFS, OS, DCR and ORR were 7.14 months, 15.5 months, 70.6% and 16.6%, respectively. The duration of prior sunitinib treatment correlated with a longer significant mPFS, 8.8 vs 6.3 months, respectively. Axitinib therapy was safe, without grade 4 adverse events. The most frequent toxicities of all grades were: fatigue (50%), hypertension (26%), and hypothyroidism (18%). G3 blood pressure elevation significantly correlated with longer mPFS and mOS compared to G1-G2 or no toxicity. Dose titration (DT) to 7 mg and 10 mg bid was feasible in 24% with no statistically significant differences in mPFS and mOS. The sunitinib-axitinib sequence was safe and effective, the mOS was 41.15 months. At multivariate analysis, gender, DCR to axitinib and to previous sunitinib correlated significantly with PFS; whereas DCR to axitinib, nephrectomy and Heng score independently affected overall survival., Conclusions: Axitinib was effective and safe in a not selected real life mRCC population. Trial registration INT - Napoli - 11/16 oss. Registered 20 April 2016. http://www.istitutotumori.na.it.

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.25874.].

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.25874.].

Background: The present analysis focuses on real-world data of Everolimus-Exemestane in advanced HR+ve, HER2-ve elderly breast cancer patients (aged 65 years) included in the EVA study, with unique findings in those aged 70 years., Methods: Data are collected from clinical records and analysed according to age cut-off (< 65 years; 65 - 69 years and {greater than or equal to} 70 years). Relationship of analyzed variables with response were tested by mean of a Mantel-Haenszel chi square test. Time to event analysis was described by Kaplan Meier approach and association with baseline characteristics was analysed by stratified log-rank test and proportional hazard model., Results: From July 2013 to December 2015, the EVA study enrolled overall 404 pts. 154 patients out of 404 (38,1%) were aged {greater than or equal to} 65 years, of whom 87 were {greater than or equal to} 70 years. Median duration of EVE treatment was 28.5 weeks (95% CI 19.0 - 33.8) in patients aged 65-69 years and 24,4 weeks (95% CI 19,2 - 33,2) in those aged {greater than or equal to} 70 years. Fewer patients aged 65 years received the highest EVE Dose-Intensity (>7.5 mg/day) in comparison to younger patients (49,6% vs. 66,8%). Grade 3-4 toxicities occurred to 55 patients (35,7%), mainly stomatitis (10,9%), rash (5,8%) and non-infectious pneumonitis (NIP) (3,6%). Some toxicities, such as weight loss and anaemia were peculiarly observed in patients aged {greater than or equal to} 70 years. Five treatment-related deaths were collected (3,2%)., Conclusions: EVE-EXE combination remains one of the potential treatments in HR+ patients also for elderly ones., Competing Interests: CONFLICTS OF INTEREST The Authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Aim: This retrospective analysis focused on the effect of treatment with EVE/EXE in a real-world population outside of clinical trials. We examined the efficacy of this combination in terms of PFS and RR related to dose intensity (5 mg daily versus 10 mg daily) and tolerability., Methods: 163 HER2-negative ER+/PgR+ ABC patients, treated with EVE/EXE from May 2011 to March 2016, were included in the analysis. The primary endpoints were the correlation between the daily dose and RR and PFS, as well as an evaluation of the tolerability of the combination. Secondary endpoints were RR, PFS, and OS according to the line of treatment. Patients were classified into three different groups, each with a different dose intensity of everolimus (A, B, C)., Results: RR was 29.8% (A), 27.8% (B) (p = 0.953), and not evaluable (C). PFS was 9 months (95% CI 7-11) (A), 10 months (95% CI 9-11) (B), and 5 months (95% CI 2-8) (C), p = 0.956. OS was 38 months (95% CI 24-38) (A), median not reached (B), and 13 months (95% CI 10-25) (C), p = 0.002. Adverse events were stomatitis 57.7% (11.0% grade 3-4), asthenia 46.0% (6.1% grade 3-4), hypercholesterolemia 46.0% (0.6% grade 3-4), and hyperglycemia 35.6% (5.5% grade 3-4). The main reason for discontinuation/interruption was grade 2-3 stomatitis., Conclusions: No correlation was found between dose intensity (5 vs. 10 mg labeled dose) and efficacy in terms of RR and PFS. The tolerability of the higher dose was poor in our experience, although this had no impact on efficacy.

We aimed to identify clinical predictors of long-term response to abiraterone (defined as >12 months drug exposure) in a retrospective cohort of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients treated in post-docetaxel setting at 24 Italian centers. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to analyze the association between clinical features and the duration of drug exposure. Results were expressed as hazard ratios (HR) with associated 95% confidence intervals (CI). A total of 143 patients met the inclusion criteria. Their median age was 73 years, median Gleason score 8 and median abiraterone exposure 20 months. At the univariate analysis, a significant correlation with the duration of abiraterone exposure was found for Gleason score (HR 0.82, 95% CI 0.71-0.96; p=0.012), PSA (HR 1.10, 95% CI 1.03-1.18; p=0.08) and lactic dehydrogenase levels (HR 1.22, 95% CI 1.02-1.46; p=0.027), while the association between lower alkaline phosphatase levels and treatment duration was marginally significant (HR 1.07, 95% CI 0.99-1.16; p=0.074). Only PSA and Gleason score were predictive of long-term treatment duration in the multivariate analysis. No other clinical factors resulted to be predictive of sustained response to abiraterone, including metastatic disease at diagnosis and visceral disease, suggesting that all subgroups of patients may derive a substantial clinical benefit from abiraterone treatment. These findings need to be validated in prospective, larger studies., Competing Interests: The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Eribulin mesylate is approved for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients after progression with anthracyclines and taxanes. Eribulin appears especially promising when combined with trastuzumab, according to the results of a recent Phase II trial in first-line setting. Here we report the case of a young, pretreated, HER2(-) MBC patient, who achieved a long-term clinical benefit with eribulin alone and in combination with trastuzumab after re-biopsy on liver metastases showed HER2 amplification. Although it is unique for its evolving clinical/biomolecular picture, this case adds anecdotal evidence to the efficacy and tolerability of this combination. However, Phase III trials are warranted to confirm its potential in first and subsequent lines of MBC treatment.

We retrospectively analyzed metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) patients treated with 3 targeted agents. Patients started the sequence with a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), sunitinib or sorafenib, and were divided into 2 groups based on the order in which they received the other reciprocal TKI and everolimus (EVE): TKI-TKI-EVE group (n = 19) and TKI-EVE-TKI group (n = 14). Median progression-free survival (PFS) with first TKI was 13 months in the TKI-TKI-EVE group and 10 months in the TKI-EVE-TKI group. PFS with the second agent showed a trend in favor of the TKI-TKI-EVE sequence, with a median of 11 versus 6.5 months, whereas median PFS with the third agent was 6 months in both groups. Total PFS also showed a trend in favor of the TKI-TKI-EVE sequence with a median of 31 versus 23 months. Median overall survival (OS) was 38 months in both groups, with more patients receiving subsequent treatment in the TKI-EVE-TKI group. The subgroup of patients no long-term responders (≤9 months) to first TKI showed similar outcomes irrespective of the sequence. The subgroup of long-term responders to first TKI (>9 months) who received the other TKI instead of EVE had better outcomes in terms of median PFS with the second agent (13 vs. 5.5 months; p = 0.0271), median total PFS (39.5 vs. 23.5 months; p = 0.0415), and median OS (46 vs. 38 months). In conclusion, no apparent advantage was observed with early use of EVE in advanced RCC, even in those patients who did not benefit long from first-line TKI, whereas long-term duration of first-line TKI seems to be predictor of second-line TKI efficacy.

Therapeutic doses of zoledronic acid markedly inhibit in vitro proliferation, chemotaxis, and capillarogenesis of bone marrow endothelial cells of patients with multiple myeloma. Zoledronic acid also induces a sizeable reduction of angiogenesis in the in vivo chorioallantoic membrane assay. These effects are partly sustained by gene and protein inhibition of vascular endothelial growth factor and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 in an autocrine loop. Mevastatin, a specific inhibitor of the mevalonate pathway, reverts the zoledronic acid antiangiogenic effect, indicating that the drug halts this pathway. Our results provide evidence of a direct antiangiogenic activity of zoledronic acid on multiple myeloma patient-derived endothelial cells due to at least four different mechanisms identified either in vitro or in vivo. Tentatively, we suggest that the zoledronic acid antitumoral activity in multiple myeloma is also sustained by antiangiogenesis, which would partly account for its therapeutic efficacy in multiple myeloma.

Vascular endothelial growth factor165 (VEGF165) and semaphorin3A (SEMA3A) elicit pro- and antiangiogenic signals respectively in endothelial cells (ECs) by binding to their receptors VEGFR-2, neuropilin-1 (NRP1), and plexin-A1. Here we show that the VEGF165-driven angiogenic potential of multiple myeloma (MM) ECs is significantly higher than that of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) ECs (MGECs) and human umbilical vein (HUV) ECs. This is probably due to a constitutive imbalance of endogenous VEGF165/SEMA3A ratio, which leans on VEGF165 in MMECs but on SEMA3A in MGECs and HUVECs. Exogenous VEGF165 induces SEMA3A expression in MGECs and HUVECs, but not in MMECs. Moreover, by counteracting VEGF165 activity as efficiently as an anti-VEGFR-2 antibody, exogenous SEMA3A restrains the over-angiogenic potential of MMECs. Our data indicate that loss of endothelial SEMA3A in favor of VEGF165 could be responsible for the angiogenic switch from MGUS to MM.

Purpose: To study the antiangiogenic effect of thalidomide., Patients and Methods: The expression of key angiogenic genes was studied in bone marrow endothelial cells (ECs) of patients with active and nonactive multiple myeloma (MM), monoclonal gammopathies unattributed/unassociated (MG[u]), diffuse large B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, in a Kaposi's sarcoma (KS) cell line, and in healthy human umbilical vein ECs (HUVECs) following exposure to therapeutic doses of thalidomide., Results: Thalidomide markedly downregulates the genes in a dose-dependent fashion in active MMECs and KS cell line, but upregulates them or is ineffective in nonactive MMECs, MG(u)ECs, NHL-ECs, and in HUVECs. Secretion of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) and hepatocyte growth factor also diminishes according to the dose in culture conditioned media (CM) of active MMECs and KS, whereas it does not change in the other CM., Conclusion: Inhibition by thalidomide is probably confined to the genes of active MMECs and KS. This would account for its higher efficacy in these diseases.

The growth of solid tumors is certainly angiogenesis dependent. However, the role of angiogenesis in the growth and survival of leukemias and other hematological malignancies has only been rendered evident since 1994 in a series of demonstrations showing that the progression of several forms is clearly related to their degree of angiogenesis. Here, we present an overview of the literature concerning the relationship between angiogenesis and disease progression in several hematological malignancies and the recent advances in antiangiogenesis in these diseases and we describe the most important active substances, preclinical and clinical data, and future perspectives.

The lymphatic system is implicated in interstitial fluid balance regulation, immune cell trafficking, oedema and cancer metastasis. However, the sequence of events that initiate and coordinate lymphatic vessel development (lymphangiogenesis) remains obscure. In effect, the understanding of physiological regulation of lymphatic vasculature has been overshadowed by the greater emphasis focused on angiogenesis, and delayed by a lack of specific markers, thereby limiting this field to no more than a descriptive characterization. Recently, new insights into lymphangiogenesis research have been due to the discovery of lymphatic-specific markers and growth factors of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) family, such as VEGF-C and VEGF-D. Studies using transgenic mice overexpressing VEGF-C and VEGF-D have demonstrated a crucial role for these factors in tumour lymphangiogenesis. Knowledge of lymphatic development has now been redefined at the molecular level, providing an interesting target for innovative therapies. This review highlights the recent insights and advances into the field of lymphatic vascular research, outlining the most important aspects of the embryo development, structure, specific markers and methods applied for studying lymphangiogenesis. Finally, molecular mechanisms involved in the regulation of lymphangiogenesis are described.

Endothelial cells (EC) were extracted through a lectin-based method from bone marrow of 57 patients with active multiple myeloma (MM) and compared with their healthy quiescent counterpart, human umbilical vein EC (HUVEC). MMECs exhibit specific antigens that indicate ongoing angiogenesis and embryo vasculogenesis; solid intercellular connections, hence stability of MM neovessels; and frequent interactions with plasma cells, hence tumor dissemination. They show heterogeneous antigen expression, hence existence of subsets. Their main genetic markers are indicative of a vascular phase. They show intrinsic angiogenic ability, because they rapidly form a capillary network in vitro, and extrinsic ability, because they generate numerous new vessels in vivo. They vividly secrete growth and invasive factors for plasma cells. They signal through kinases mandatory for development of neovascularization. Ultrastructurally, they are abnormal and show metabolic activation, like tumor ECs. Thalidomide heavily interferes with their functions. Vasculogenesis and angiogenesis might contribute to the MM vascular tree and progression, in the form of growth, invasion, and dissemination. In view of the heterogeneity of the antigenic phenotype of MMECs, a mixture (or a sequence) of antiangiogenic agents coupled with thalidomide would seem plausible for the biologic management of MM.

Chemokines are cytokines which induce chemotaxis on many cell types, thus regulating cell migration within inflammatory and allergic sites, and leucocyte homing. Also, they play a crucial role in inflammatory and tumor-associated angiogenesis, as well as in tumor progression. Chemokines are grouped into: 1) alpha or CXC; 2) beta or CC; 3) gamma or C; 4) delta or CX3C molecules. Each of them recognizes one or more cell surface receptors, named CXCR, CCR, XCR, CX3CR respectively, according to the corresponding subfamily. Many chemokines have been identified within tumor tissues, as a secretory product of tumor cells and/or inflammatory cells. The CXC chemokines (such as IL-8, IP10, Mig, SDF-1 alpha) or CC chemokines (such as MCP-1, MIP-1 alpha, eotaxin, RANTES) have been frequently harvested from tumor tissues or the biological fluids of patients. Some chemokines inhibit tumor growth and progression by activating immunocompetent cytolytic cells or inhibiting tumor-associated angiogenesis. In contrast, other chemokines induce tumor progression by interacting with the specific receptor expressed on the tumor cells and hence by activating chemotaxis and secretion of proteolytic enzymes, or by inducing angiogenesis and metastatic spreading. Sometimes neoplastic cells express chemokine receptors which are not expressed on their normal counterpart. Data from this lab show the CXCR3 expression by cells from lymphoproliferative diseases, such as multiple myeloma and lymphoma, and the stimulation of an invasive phenotype following interaction with specific chemokines.