Search

Objective: To assess the image quality of coronary CT angiography (CCTA) for suspected acute coronary syndrome (ACS) outside office hours. Methods: Patients with symptoms suggestive of an ACS underwent CCTA at the emergency department 24 hours, 7 days a week. A total of 118 patients, of whom 89 (75 %) presented during office hours (weekdays between 07:00 and 17:00) and 29 (25 %) outside office hours (weekdays between 17:00 and 07:00, weekends and holidays) underwent CCTA. Image quality was evaluated per coronary segment by two experienced readers and graded on an ordinal scale ranging from 1 to 3. Results: There were no significant differences in acquisition parameters, beta-blocker administration or heart rate between patients presenting during office hours and outside office hours. The median quality score per patient was 30.5 [interquartile range 26.0–33.5] for patients presenting during office hours in comparison to 27.5 [19.75–32.0] for patients presenting outside office hours (p=0.043). The number of non-evaluable segments was lower for patients presenting during office hours (0 [0–1.0] vs. 1.0 [0–4.0], p=0.009). Conclusion: Image quality of CCTA outside office hours in the diagnosis of suspected ACS is diminished. Key Points: • Quality scores were higher for coronary-CTA during office hours.• There were no differences in acquisition parameters.• There was a non-significant trend towards higher heart rates outside office hours.• Coronary-CTA on the ED requires state-of-the-art scanner technology and sufficiently trained staff.• Coronary-CTA on the ED needs preparation time and optimisation of

Coronary calcium scoring (CCS) adds to the diagnostic performance of myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) to assess the presence of significant coronary artery disease (CAD). Patients with a high pre-test likelihood are expected to have a high CCS which potentially could enhance the diagnostic performance of myocardial perfusion SPECT in this specific patient group. We evaluated the added value of CCS to SPECT in the diagnosis of significant CAD in patients with an intermediate to high pre-test likelihood. In total, 129 patients (mean age 62.7 ± 9.7 years, 65 % male) with stable anginal complaints and intermediate to high pre-test likelihood of CAD (median 87 %, range 22-95) were prospectively included in this study. All patients received SPECT and CCS imaging preceding invasive coronary angiography (CA). Fractional flow reserve (FFR) measurements were acquired from patients with angiographically estimated 50-95 % obstructive CAD. For SPECT a SSS > 3 was defined significant CAD. For CCS the optimal cut-off value for significant CAD was determined by ROC curve analysis. The reference standard for significant CAD was a FFR of <0.80 acquired by CA. Significant CAD was demonstrated in 64 patients (49.6 %). Optimal CCS cut-off value for significant CAD was >182.5. ROC curve analysis for prediction of the presence of significant CAD for SPECT, CCS and the combination of CCS and SPECT resulted in an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.88 (95 % CI 81-94), 0.75 (95 % CI 66-83 %) and 0.92 (95 % CI 87-97 %) respectively. The difference of the AUC between SPECT and the combination of CCS and SPECT wa

Objectives: To evaluate to what extent treatment decisions for patients with stable angina pectoris can be made based on hybrid myocardial perfusion single-photon emission CT (SPECT) and CT coronary angiography (CCTA). It has been shown that hybrid SPECT/CCTA has good performance in the diagnosis of significant coronary artery disease (CAD). The question remains whether these imaging results lead to similar treatment decisions as compared to standalone SPECT and invasive coronary angiography (CA). Methods: We prospectively included 107 patients (mean age 62.8±10.0 years, 69% male) with stable anginal complaints and an intermediate to high pre-test likelihood for CAD. Hybrid SPECT/CCTA was performed prior to CA in all patients. The study outcome was the treatment decision categorised as: no revascularisation, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Treatment decisions were made by two interventional cardiologists and one cardiothoracic surgeon in two steps: first, based on the results of hybrid SPECT/CCTA; second, based on SPECT and CA. Results: Revascularisation (PCI or CABG) was indicated in 54 (50%) patients based on SPECT and CA. Percentage agreement of treatment decisions in all patients based on hybrid SPECT/CCTA versus SPECT and CA on the necessity of revascularisation was 92%. Percentage agreement of treatment decisions in patients with matched, unmatched and normal hybrid SPECT/CCTA findings was 95%, 84% and 100%, respectively. Conclusions: Panel evaluation shows that patients could be accurately indicated for and deferred from revascularisation based on hybrid SPECT/CCTA.

For several decades invasive coronary angiography (CA) has been the reference standard in the assessment of coronary artery disease (CAD) severity. Patients with high pre-test likelihood of CAD, receive a Class 1 indication for CA. Several factors, however, motivate the need for a reliable non-invasive imaging modality, especially in patients with a high pre-test likelihood. Not only to rule out, but also to reliably diagnose coronary stenosis with functional consequences (significant CAD) and guide therapeutic decision making. Performance of CA in all patients with high pre-test likelihood of CAD has undeniable drawbacks. First of all, the prevalence of angiographically significant CAD in patients with high pre-test likelihood may be as low as 44-46%. In real life, the prevalence of significant CAD in patients referred for CA is even lower at only 36.7%, according to the national cardiovascular data registry of the United States . Secondly, angiographic severity of CAD does not reliably predict its main functional consequence: myocardial ischemia 6-8. Because evidence of myocardial ischemia is needed before deciding whether revascularization is necessary, additional (non- ) invasive tests are needed . Finally, CA comes with high costs as a result of the need for admission to a hospital or day-care facility and a low risk (0.1%) of serious adverse events . With the advent of computed tomography coronary angiography (CCTA) and the known reliability of single photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging (SPECT-MPI) a combination of non-invasive imaging modalities became available that potentially could reliably diagnose significant CAD. The high diagnostic accuracy of this combination has previously been shown in highly selected patient populations. Nevertheless, data demonstrating the applicability of hybrid SPECT and CCTA in diagnosing significant CAD in stable patients with an intermediate to high pre-test likelihood of CAD are still lacking. Fu