Search

Deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism are concerning causes of morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing general surgical procedures. Laparoscopic surgery has gained rapid acceptance in the past several years and is now a commonly performed procedure by most general surgeons. Multiple anecdotal reports of pulmonary embolism following laparoscopic cholecystectomy have been reported, but the true incidence of deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery is not known. We present a case of pulmonary embolism following laparoscopic repair of paraesophageal hernia. The literature is then reviewed regarding the incidence of pulmonary embolism following laparoscopic surgery, the mechanism of deep venous thrombosis formation, and the recommendations for deep venous thrombosis prophylaxis in patients undergoing laparoscopic procedures.

Context: Hyperglycemia resolves quickly after bariatric surgery, but the underlying mechanism and the most effective type of surgery remains unclear.Objective: To examine glucose metabolism and beta-cell function in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) after two types of bariatric intervention; Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) and gastric restrictive (GR) surgery.Design: Prospective, nonrandomized, repeated-measures, 4-week, longitudinal clinical trial.Patients: In all, 16 T2DM patients (9 males and 7 females, 52+/-14 years, 47+/-9 kg m(-2), HbA1c 7.2+/-1.1%) undergoing either RYGB (N=9) or GR (N=7) surgery.Outcome Measures: Glucose, insulin secretion, insulin sensitivity at baseline, and 1 and 4 weeks post-surgery, using hyperglycemic clamps and C-peptide modeling kinetics; glucose, insulin secretion and gut-peptide responses to mixed meal tolerance test (MMTT) at baseline and 4 weeks post-surgery.Results: At 1 week post-surgery, both groups experienced a similar weight loss and reduction in fasting glucose (P<0.01). However, insulin sensitivity increased only after RYGB, (P<0.05). At 4 weeks post-surgery, weight loss remained similar for both groups, but fasting glucose was normalized only after RYGB (95+/-3 mg 100 ml(-1)). Insulin sensitivity improved after RYGB (P<0.01) and did not change with GR, whereas the disposition index remained unchanged after RYGB and increased 30% after GR (P=0.10). The MMTT elicited a robust increase in insulin secretion, glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) levels and beta-cell sensitivity to glucose only after RYGB (P<0.05).Conclusion: RYGB provides a more rapid improvement in glucose regulation compared with GR. This improvement is accompanied by enhanced insulin sensitivity and beta-cell responsiveness to glucose, in part because of an incretin effect. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Type 2 diabetes and obesity are associated with reduced health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and health utility (HU), but long-term effects of metabolic/bariatric surgery (MBS) compared with those of medical/lifestyle intervention (MLI) on these outcomes are unclear., Research Design and Methods: We studied 228 individuals with type 2 diabetes and obesity randomly assigned to MBS (Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, sleeve gastrectomy, or gastric band; n = 152) or MLI (n = 76) in the ARMMS-T2D study. HRQoL (36-Item Short-Form Health Survey [SF-36], including Physical Component Score [PCS] and Mental Component Score [MCS]) and HU (Short Form 6 Dimensions [SF-6D]) were measured annually up to 12 years., Results: At baseline, participants' mean ± SD age was 49.2 ± 8.0 years, 68.4% were female, BMI was 36.3 ± 3.4 kg/m2, and HbA1c was 8.7 ± 1.6%. PCS improved significantly more in the MBS versus MLI group over 12 years (+2.37 ± 0.53 vs. -0.95 ± 0.73; difference 3.32 ± 0.85; P < 0.001). MBS was associated with better general health (P < 0.001), physical functioning (P = 0.001), and vitality (P = 0.003). Reduction in BMI was greater after MBS versus MLI (P < 0.001) and correlated with improved PCS (r = -0.43; P < 0.001). Change in PCS was not associated with change in HbA1c. MCS changed minimally from baseline and was similar between MBS and MLI groups during follow-up (-0.21 ± 0.61 vs. -0.89 ± 0.84; difference 0.68 ± 0.97; P = 0.48). Improvements in HU were greater in the MBS versus MLI group over 12 years (+0.02 ± 0.01 vs. -0.01 ± 0.01; difference 0.03 ± 0.01; P = 0.003)., Conclusions: Metabolic surgery produces sustained weight loss and improves PCS, general health, physical functioning, vitality, and HU in individuals with type 2 diabetes and obesity compared with medical therapy up to 12 years after intervention., (© 2025 by the American Diabetes Association.)

Introduction: Metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) is increasingly used for obesity and metabolic disease, with safety profiles showing it is among the safest major operations. The last 20 + years have noted significantly improved safety that has been accompanied by decreasing length of stay and select populations electing for outpatient surgery, leading to continued decreases in cost. Regardless, readmissions and complications still occur, requiring inpatient postoperative care (IP-POC). The current study aimed to identify and characterize at-risk populations for MBS-related IP-POC., Study Design: The 2015-2021 MBSAQIP (n = 1,346,468 records) was used to extract 973,520 primary cases of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy, Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, duodenal switch, and associated IP-POC. Conversions, pediatric cases, and < 30-day follow-up were excluded. IP-POC severity scores were calculated by summing readmissions (1 point), interventions (5 points), and reoperations (15 points). Risk factors associated with IP-POC were identified using zero-inflated Poisson models., Results: GERD, COPD, smoking, and type of MBS procedure were significantly associated with increased IP-POC incidence and severity. Male sex was associated with increased severity but a lower likelihood of IP-POC, while Black and Hispanic race predicted increased IP-POC likelihood but not severity. ROC curve analysis identified IP-POC score thresholds of ≥ 6 and ≥ 10 as significantly associated with MACE (OR 2.4) and 30-day mortality (OR 4.7)., Conclusion: The weighted IP-POC model demonstrated associations between preoperative characteristics and increased IP-POC likelihood and severity. These findings add to the current understanding of MBS patient care dynamics, and can be used to improve patient counseling, refine postoperative protocols, and optimize resource allocation., Competing Interests: Declarations. Competing Interests: Dr. Cook served as a consultant for Asensus Surgical, Intuitive Surgical, and Vicarious Surgical. Dr. Schauer reports receiving research grants from Ethicon and Medtronic; receiving personal consulting fees or honoraria from GI Dynamics, Keyron, Persona, Mediflix, Metabolic Health International, LTD, Lilly, Heron, Novo Nordisk, Klens; serving on scientific advisory boards for SE Healthcare Board of Directors, GI Dynamics, Keyron, Persona, Mediflix; and having ownership interest in SE Healthcare LLC, Mediflix, Metabolic Health International, LTD. The other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare. The other authors declare no competing interests., (© 2025. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Competing Interests: Declaration of interests FR declares research grants from Ethicon (Johnson & Johnson), Novo Nordisk, and Medtronic; consulting fees from Morphic Medical; speaking honoraria from Medtronic, Ethicon, Novo Nordisk, Eli Lilly, and Amgen; has served (unpaid) as a member of the scientific advisory board for Keyron, and a member of data safety and monitoring board for GI Metabolic Solutions; is president of the Metabolic Health Institute (non-profit); and is sole director of Metabolic Health International and London Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery (private practice). JRLF declares personal consulting or speaker fees from Novo Nordisk, IFA Celtics, Eli Lilly, and Merck. PS declares research grants (paid to institution) from the National Health and Medical Research Council; coauthorship of manuscripts with medical writing assistance from Novo Nordisk and Eli Lilly; and an unpaid position in the leadership group of the Obesity Collective. WAB declares research grants from Johnson & Johnson, Medtronic, Gore, Applied Medical, Novo Nordisk, National Health and Medical Research Council, Myerton, and the Australian Commonwealth Government; and personal consulting fees for lectures and advisory boards from Johnson & Johnson, Gore, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, Medtronic, Eli Lily, and Merck Sharp & Dohme. GM declares consulting fees from Novo Nordisk, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly, Medtronic, Fractyl, and Recor; and is a scientific advisor for Keyron, Metadeq, GHP Scientific, and Jemyll. MB declares personal honoraria as a consultant and speaker from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Daiichi Sankyo, Eli Lilly, Novo Nordisk, Novartis, Pfizer, and Sanofi. ML declares personal consulting fees from, and has served on scientific boards for, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, and Eli Lilly. LMSC declares consultancy fees from Antaros Medical. MTvdM declares past consulting fees from Netcare PTY and Novo Nordisk. RVC declares research grants from Johnson & Johnson and Medtronic; honoraria for lectures and presentations from Johnson & Johnson, Medtronic, and Novo Nordisk; and serving on scientific advisory boards for Morphic Medical, Johnson & Johnson, and Medtronic. AM declares research grants from USV (India) and AstraZeneca; honoraria for lectures from USV (India), Eli Lilly, Lupin, Boehringer Ingelheim, Janssen, Cipla, AstraZeneca, Glenmark, Zydus, Novo Nordisk, Sanofi, Danone, Abbott, and the Almond Board of California; support for attending meetings or travel from USV (India), Eli Lilly, Boehringer Ingelheim, AstraZeneca, Lupin, and the Almond Board of California. KC is a primary investigator for Rhythm Pharmaceuticals, Bioprojects, and Integrative Phenomic (SME) trials; declares support for attending meetings or travel from Rhythm Pharmaceuticals and Novo Nordisk; and received research grants or support from Rhythm Pharmaceuticals to conduct research or deliver lectures via Institutions (Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Sorbonne Université). RFK declares consulting fees from Novo Nordisk, Weight Watchers, Eli Lilly, Boehringer Ingelheim, Altimmune, Structure, and Regeneron. JN has no personal relationships with industry; is an employee of the Obesity Action Coalition, which receives unrestricted support from a wide variety of companies and organisations interested in obesity care including, from the pharmaceutical industry (NovoNordisk, Eli Lilly, Boehringer Ingelheim, Pfizer, Amgen, Genentech, Regeneron, Wave Life Sciences, Zealand Pharma, KVKTech, Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, Structure Therapeutics, Biohaen Pharmaceuticals, and Currax), surgical industry (Intuitive, Ethicon, Medtronic, and Boston Scientific), behavioural care (WW International and WondrHealth), and not-for-profit medical societies (American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery, the Obesity Society, and the Obesity Medicine Association); and is president and chief executive officer for the Obesity Action Coalition. NS declares consulting or speaker honoraria from Abbott, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly, Hanmi Pharmaceuticals, Janssen, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, Roche Diagnostics, and Sanofi; and grants (paid to institution) from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Novartis, and Roche Diagnostics. WTG declares consulting fees as a member of advisory boards for Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, Fractyl Health, Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inogen, Zealand Pharma, Allurion, Carmot Therapeutics (Roche), Regeneron, and Merck; research grants as a site principal investigator for multicentre clinical trials sponsored by his university and funded by Novo Nordisk, Eli Lilly, Epitomee, Neurovalens, and Pfizer; has served as a consultant on an advisory board for the non-profit Milken Foundation; and is a member of the data monitoring committee for phase 3 clinical trials conducted by Boehringer Ingelheim and Eli Lilly. BL declares research grants from US National Institutes of Health (not related to this Commission); and personal consulting fees from UpToDate. RHE declares consulting fees from Novo Nordisk, The Healthy Aging Co, and WW International. AK declares research grants from Novo Nordisk, ELPEN Pharma, and Pharmaserve–Lilly; serving on scientific advisory boards for Novo Nordisk, Pharmaserve–Lilly, Sanofi, and Boehringher Ingelheim; and honoraria for lectures by Novo Nordisk, Pharmaserve–Lilly, AstraZeneca, MSD, Sanofi, Bausch Health, Ethicon, Galenica Pharma, Epsilon Health, and Winmedica. J-PD declares grants from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research; and personal consulting fees from INVERSAGO Pharma as a member of the advisory board. KWT declares speaker honoraria or consulting fees from Novo Nordisk, Eurodrug Laboratories, iNova Pharmaceuticals, and DKSH; travel support from Novo Nordisk; and serving on advisory boards of Novo Nordisk, DKSH (representing Eli Lilly), Abbott Nutrition, and Boehringer Ingelheim. ER declares research grants from Eli Lilly and Novo Nordisk; and consulting fees from Energesis Pharmaceuticals, Eli Lilly, Amway, Kintai Therapeutics, YSOPIA Bioscience (previously LNC Therapeutics), CINFINA Pharmaceuticals, and Boehringer Ingelheim. JBD declares personal consulting fees from Reshape Lifescience, and Nestle Health Science Australia; serving on advisory boards and speaker panels for Reshape Lifescience, Nestle Health Science Australia, Novo Nordisk, Eli Lilly, and I-nova; and speaker fees from HealthED and Eurodrug Laboratories. FP declares personal consulting fees from Medtronic, Ethicon, Novo Nordisk, and Eli Lilly. DEC declares serving on scientific advisory boards for GI Dynamics, Gila Therapeutics, and Endogenex. TK declares research grants from Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim and Sumitomo Pharma; consulting fees from Taisho Pharmaceutical, Eli Lilly Japan, and Novo Nordisk; and honoraria for lectures from Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim, Sumitomo Pharma, Teijin Pharma, MSD, Eli Lilly Japan, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation, Taisho Pharmaceutical, and Novo Nordisk. NBAB declares research grants from NovoNordisk and AstraZeneca; and honoraria for lectures and presentations from Novo Nordisk, Boehringer Ingelheim, AstraZeneca, Merck, MSD, Sanofi, and Servier. JV was national clinical director for diabetes and obesity at NHS England from April, 2013, to September, 2023; declares funding support from the North West London National Institute for Health and Care Research Applied Research Collaboration, CW+ (the official charity of Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust), European Commission Horizon Europe 2022, and UK Research and Innovation Horizon Europe. CWlR declares grants from the Irish Research Council, Science Foundation Ireland, Anabio, and the Health Research Board; serving on advisory boards and speakers panels for Novo Nordisk, Herbalife, GI Dynamics, Eli Lilly, Johnson & Johnson, Glia, Irish Life Health, Boehringer Ingelheim, Currax, Zealand Pharma, Keyron, and Rhythm Pharmaceuticals; was the chief medical officer and director (unpaid) of the Medical Device Division of Keyron in 2021; was a previous investor in Keyron, which develops endoscopically implantable medical devices intended to mimic the surgical procedures of sleeve gastrectomy and gastric bypass (no patients have been included in any of Keyron's studies and they are not listed on the stock market); was gifted stock holdings in September, 2021, and divested all stock holdings in Keyron in September, 2021; continues to provide scientific advice (unpaid) to Keyron; and provides (unpaid) obesity clinical care in the Beyond BMI clinic (Dublin, Ireland), and is a shareholder in the clinic. NJF-L declares personal consulting fees from WHO and the European Commission (Best Re-MaP joint action [a project aimed to develop and implement policy proposals in nutrition for children]). NFA declares personal consulting fees from Ethicon and Eli Lilly; and serving on scientific advisory boards for Novo Nordisk and Eli Lilly. ISF declares personal consulting fees from Rhythm Pharmaceuticals, Eli Lilly, Novo Nordisk, SV Health, Nodthera Therapeutics, and Goldman Sachs. VMM declares personal consulting fees from Boehringer Ingelheim and Novo Nordisk. JPK declares research grants from the US National Institutes of Health (grants U54, U01, and U54 GM104940 that could be indirectly linked to the work of this Commission); and honoraria for serving on scientific advisory boards of Novo Nordisk and the Annual Reviews of Nutrition. KMM reports serving on scientific advisory boards for Novo Nordisk and Rhythm Pharmaceuticals; and is a member of a drug safety and monitoring board for Novartis. PRS declares research grants from Ethicon and Medtronic; personal consulting fees or honoraria from GI Dynamics, Keyron, Persona, Mediflix, Metabolic Health International, Eli Lilly, Heron, Novo Nordisk, and Klens; serving on scientific advisory boards for SE Healthcare Board of Directors, GI Dynamics, Keyron, Persona, and Mediflix; and has ownership interest in SE Healthcare, Mediflix, and Metabolic Health International. HT declares research grants from Amgen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Daiichi Sankyo, Novartis, and Novo Nordisk; serving on advisory boards for Novo Nordisk, Daiichi Sankyo, and Novartis; and speakers fees from Daiichi Sankyo, Novartis, and Novo Nordisk. MHT declares participation in a scientific advisory board meeting of ERX Pharmaceuticals (Cambridge, MA, USA) in 2019; was a member of the Research Cluster Advisory Panel of the Novo Nordisk Foundation between 2017 and 2019; funding for research projects from Novo Nordisk (2016–20) and Sanofi-Aventis (2012–19); consulted twice for Boehringer Ingelheim (2020 and 2021); delivered scientific lectures for Sanofi-Aventis (2020), Boehringer Ingelheim (2024), and AstraZeneca (2024); is cofounder of the biotech startups Ghrelco and Bluewater Biotech (2024); is chief executive officer and chief scientific officer of Helmholtz Munich, and is co-responsible for countless collaborations of the employees with a multitude of companies and institutions worldwide (in this capacity, discusses potential projects with and signs contracts for the centres institutes related to research collaborations worldwide, including, but not limited to, pharmaceutical corporations such as Boehringer Ingelheim, Novo Nordisk, Roche Diagnostics, Arbormed, Eli Lilly, and SCG Cell Therapy, and as chief scientific officer is responsible for commercial technology transfer activities); and is a former member of the scientific advisory board of ERX, which is developing the drug celastrol, but has no current competing interests. JPHW declares consultancy or advisory board work for the pharmaceutical industry contracted via the University of Liverpool (no personal payment) for Altimmune, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly, Napp, Novo Nordisk, Menarini, Pfizer, Regeneron, Rhythm Pharmaceuticals, Sanofi, Saniona, Tern, Shionogi, and YSOPIA Bioscience; research grants for clinical trials from AstraZeneca and Novo Nordisk; personal honoraria or lecture fees from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Medscape, Napp, Novo Nordisk, and Rhythm Pharmaceuticals; is past president of the World Obesity Federation; and was national lead for the Metabolic and Endocrine Speciality Group of the National Institute of Health and Reasearch Clinical Research Network from 2010–24; and is a member of the Rank Prize Funds Nutrition Committee and a past member of the RCP committee on nutrition, weight, and health. FCS declares personal consulting fees from Eli Lilly, Novo Nordisk, Boehringer Ingelheim, Pfizer, Gelesis, Currax, and Rhythm Pharmaceuticals; and has served on scientific advisory boards for Eli Lilly and Novo Nordisk. LAB declares serving on scientific advisory board for Novo Nordisk (for the ACTION Teens study) and Eli Lilly; and speaker fees (paid to institution) from Novo Nordisk. LMK declares participation on advisory boards for Boehringer Ingelheim and Eli Lilly; and consulting fees from Altimmune, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Cytoki, Ethicon, Glyscend, Kallyope, Eli Lilly, Neurogastrx, Novo Nordisk, Optum Health, Perspectum, Pfizer, Sidekick Health, Xeno Biosciences, and Zealand Pharma. RLB declares research grants from the Sir Jules Thorn Trust, National Institutes for Health and Care Research, Rosetrees Trust, and Novo Nordisk; personal consulting fees from Eli Lilly, Novo Nordisk, Gila Therapeutics, Epitomee Medical, Medscape, ViiV, and International Medical Press; serving on scientific advisory boards for Eli Lilly, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, ViiV, and International Medical Press; leadership or fiduciary roles (unpaid) in other board, society, committee, or advocacy groups for the Royal College of Physicians; is a committee member of the British Obesity and Metabolic Surgery Society and the National Bariatric Surgery Registry; is scientific chair of the International Federation for the Surgery of Obesity, European Chapter; is a trustee for the Association for the Study of Obesity and the Obesity Empowerment Network UK; is a member of the Obesity Guideline Update Committee for the National Institutes for Health and Care Excellence; and, since May 15, 2023, is senior vice president for Eli Lilly and holds shares in Eli Lilly, and as a result has had no active involvement in this Commission since May 1, 2023 (however, to comply with authorship requirements, RLB read and approved the final draft [see Acknowledgements for details]). RV declares research grants from Pfizer; fees for educational purposes from Novo Nordisk, AstraZeneca, and Eli Lilly; and serving on scientific advisory boards for Eli Lilly and Novo Nordisk. MO-G declares research grants from Adamed Poland; personal consulting fees from Baush Health, Novo Nordisk, and Promed Poland; and serving on scientific advisory boards for Baush Health, Novo Nordisk, and Boehringer Ingelheim. HJG declares consulting fees from Gila Pharmaceuticals and Pfizer. SL declares research grants from Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novo Nordisk, and LG Chem; and honoraria as a consultant or speaker for AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Abbott, LG Chem, Daewoong Pharmaceutical, Chong Kun Dang Pharmaceutical, and Novo Nordisk. All other authors have no competing interests.

Introduction: Operative selection in metabolic surgery is a complex, collaborative process between patient and surgeon, considering factors such as risk, cost, desired weight loss, and resolution of associated comorbidities. This study aimed to explore the association of patient demographics and body mass index on operative selection., Materials and Methods: Retrospective review of 388 patient surveys prior to initial surgical visit (2020-2023) was conducted at a single institution. Patient demographics as well as operation preference prior to the initial visit and procedure ultimately performed were evaluated. Categorical variables were summarized as frequency and percentage and compared using chi-square tests. Continuous measures were summarized as means and standard deviations and compared using analysis of variance. Proceeding with the originally preferred procedure was modeled using multivariable logistic regression., Results: Prior to the initial visit, 62.1% of patients indicated preference toward sleeve gastrectomy, while 14.9% indicated preference toward Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Notably, initial patient preferences aligned with the actual procedure, with 69.3% of sleeve gastrectomy-desiring patients and 62.1% of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass-desiring patients receiving their preferred operation. Factors associated with actual procedure performed included male sex (OR 3.27 [1.04, 10.26]) and presence of preoperative sleep apnea (OR 0.41 [0.20,0.81]) and hypertension (OR 0.46 [0.22,0.96]). Other factors that showed an association with preference, but were not statistically significant, included body mass index., Conclusions: Patients' comorbidities and sex are associated with the likelihood of undergoing the preferred operation procedure. However, most patients underwent their preferred procedure, highlighting the importance of patients' selection., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Obesity is a chronic, relapsing condition with severe health risks and a huge economic burden. Effective interventions for severe obesity include bariatric or metabolic surgery and high-intensity medical management involving lifestyle changes and pharmacotherapy. This article summarizes the debate between Drs. Schauer and Rothberg at the June 2024 Endocrine Society meeting regarding the optimal approach to managing obesity, exploring mechanisms, outcomes, safety, quality-of-life, and cost-effectiveness. Metabolic surgery results in substantial and sustained weight loss, improvements in comorbidities like type 2 diabetes, reduced mortality, and is cost-effective. However, it carries risks associated with surgery and long-term complications, and its high upfront costs limit its scalability. Conversely, high-intensity medical management, which includes comprehensive lifestyle interventions and pharmacotherapy, leads to meaningful, though sometimes less substantial weight loss and health improvements. The latter approach prioritizes behavioral changes and is cost-effective but requires patient adherence and faces challenges with medication side effects and costs. Both interventions offer substantial health benefits; the choice between them should consider individual patient needs, health status, target weight loss, and personal preferences. Metabolic surgery may be more suitable for individuals with severe obesity or when comorbidities are inadequately controlled, whereas medical management may be more suited to patients with less severe obesity and those preferring non-surgical options. Future research should investigate the combined effects of surgery and medical management and enhance access to and affordability of these treatments. A multidisciplinary, personalized approach will likely yield the best outcomes in managing this complex health issue., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Endocrine Society. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com. See the journal About page for additional terms.)

Background: Early small bowel obstruction (eSBO) (within 30-days) is a rare but important complication that is associated with high rates of morbidity, including readmission, reintervention, and reoperation., Objectives: To identify patient-specific and operation-specific characteristics that predispose patients to eSBO and to identify at-risk individuals preoperatively., Setting: 2015-2021 Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP)., Methods: Utilizing the 2015-2021 MBSAQIP PUF, 1,016,484 records were analyzed. Pediatric, revisional, open-conversion, and cases with incomplete data in sex, body mass index, operative-time, 30-day-follow-up variables were excluded. Case details were compared using Fisher's exact & Wilcoxon -Mann -Whitney tests to identify at-risk patients. The likelihood of eSBO was modeled with rare event logistic regression., Results: Incidence of eSBO was .40%. Of the 4103 occurrences of eSBO, RYGB (Roux-en-Y gastric bypass), SG (sleeve gastrectomy), and DS (duodenal switch) accounted for 79.4%, 19.3%, and 1.3%, respectively. Many patient-specific characteristics were significantly associated with eSBO. History of prior foregut surgery, a non-metabolic surgery trained operator, and longer operative times were all associated with increased eSBO (P < .0001). While simultaneously controlling for these factors, eSBO remained higher in DS (OR 9.55, P < .0001) and RYGB (OR 5.18, P < .0001) compared to SG. Increased length of operation (OR 1.03, P < .0001) and non -MS-trained operators (OR 1.33, P < .0001) remained highly significant. Male-sex (OR .70, P < .0001) and diabetes (OR .78, P < .0001) were both protective., Conclusions: In the largest analysis to date, eSBO remains a rare event. RYGB accounts for the largest proportion of eSBO, however, DS has a higher risk adjusted rate of eSBO., (Copyright © 2024 American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) and sleeve gastrectomy (SG) are effective procedures to treat and manage type 2 diabetes (T2D). However, the underlying metabolic adaptations that mediate improvements in glucose homeostasis remain largely elusive. The purpose of this study was to identify metabolic signatures associated with biochemical resolution of T2D after medical therapy (MT) or bariatric surgery., Research Design and Methods: Plasma samples from 90 patients (age 49.9 ± 7.6 years; 57.7% female) randomly assigned to MT (n = 30), RYGB (n = 30), or SG (n = 30) were retrospectively subjected to untargeted metabolomic analysis using ultra performance liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry at baseline and 24 months of treatment. Phenotypic importance was determined by supervised machine learning. Associations between change in glucose homeostasis and circulating metabolites were assessed using a linear mixed effects model., Results: The circulating metabolome was dramatically remodeled after SG and RYGB, with largely overlapping signatures after MT. Compared with MT, SG and RYGB profoundly enhanced the concentration of metabolites associated with lipid and amino acid signaling, while limiting xenobiotic metabolites, a function of decreased medication use. Random forest analysis revealed 2-hydroxydecanoate as having selective importance to RYGB and as the most distinguishing feature between MT, SG, and RYGB. To this end, change in 2-hydroxydecanoate correlated with reductions in fasting glucose after RYGB but not SG or MT., Conclusions: We identified a novel metabolomic fingerprint characterizing the longer-term adaptations to MT, RYGB, and SG. Notably, the metabolomic profiles of RYGB and SG procedures were distinct, indicating equivalent weight loss may be achieved by divergent effects on metabolism., (© 2024 by the American Diabetes Association.)

Background: Endometrial cancer (EC) is the strongest obesity-associated malignancy and the fastest-growing cancer in young women. Early identification of EC and other endometrial pathology (malignant and nonmalignant) in women with severe obesity may improve treatment options and uterine preservation. Screening for endometrial pathology using abnormal or postmenopausal uterine bleeding (APUB) as a surrogate in women pursuing metabolic/bariatric surgery may be clinically beneficial, but data supporting this effort are limited., Objective: To develop and institute a screening program for APUB as a surrogate for endometrial pathology in bariatric surgery candidates., Setting: Two, academic metabolic/bariatric surgery programs in Louisiana, United States., Methods: The Modified SAMANTA is a 10-item questionnaire that was implemented to identify patients with APUB, specifically combining tools designed to identify anovulatory/postmenopausal and heavy menstrual bleeding. Demographic (age, race), body mass index, and questionnaire data were analyzed with respect to positive screening using data from March 2021 through May 2023., Results: Of 1371 eligible women presenting for surgical evaluation, 664 (48.4%) positive screens were identified and referred for gynecologic evaluation to rule out endometrial hyperplasia/cancer or other endometrial pathology. The likelihood of positive screening for APUB was associated with increasing BMI (P = .001) and Black/African American race (P = .003), as well as increasing SAMANTA score (P < .001). In contrast, risk of positive screening was negatively associated with increasing age (P < .001)., Conclusions: Women presenting for metabolic/bariatric surgery have a high prevalence of APUB and, given this dysfunctional bleeding and concurrent obesity, are at greater risk for underlying EC. Potential risk factors for APUB, given their associations with screening positive, include increased body mass index, younger age, and Black/African American race. Standardized screening with appropriate gynecologic referral should be a routine part of the overall evaluation for women with severe obesity., (Copyright © 2024 American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

For adults with advanced heart failure, class II/III obesity (body mass index ≥35 kg/m 2 ) represents major challenges, and it is even considered a contraindication for heart transplantation (HT) at many centers. This has led to growing interest in preventing and treating obesity to help patients with advanced heart failure become HT candidates. Among all weight-loss strategies, bariatric surgery (BSx) has the greatest weight loss efficacy and has shown value in enabling select patients with left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) and obesity to lose sufficient weight to access HT. Nevertheless, both BSx and antiobesity medications warrant caution in the LVAD population. In this review, the authors describe and interpret the available published reports on the impact of obesity and weight-loss strategies for patients with LVADs from general and HT candidacy standpoints. The authors also provide an overview of the journey of LVAD recipients who undergo BSx and review major aspects of perioperative protocols., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures Dr daSilva-deAbreu owns stocks of TransMedics Group, Inc, Annovis Bio Inc, and Altimmune, Inc. Dr Mandras has received consulting fees from and has been on the Speakers Bureau for Bayer and United Therapeutics. Dr Lavie has received consulting fees from and has served as a speaker for AstraZeneca; and has served on a DSMB for NovoNordisk on their REDEFINE 3 trial with CagriSema. Dr Ventura has received consulting fees from and has served as a speaker for AstraZeneca. Dr Schauer has consultancy agreements with GI Dynamics, Keyron, Persona, Mediflix, Metabolic Health International, LTD, Lilly, Ethicon, Medtronic, and Novo Nordisk; has ownership interest in SE Healthcare LLC, Mediflix, and Metabolic Health International LTD; and has received research funding from Ethicon and Medtronic. All other authors report that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2024 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Patients with Medicare/Medicaid insurance receive metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) at lower rates than privately insured (PI) patients. Although studies on some surgical procedures report that Medicare/Medicaid insurance confers increased postoperative complication rates and a longer length of stay, less is known about these outcomes after MBS. Among often-feared postoperative complications are major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACEs). Although these events are rare after MBS, they have a significant impact on morbidity and mortality., Objectives: This study aimed to examine the effect of insurance payor status on MACEs after MBS., Setting: The Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project National Inpatient Sample (HCUP-NIS)., Methods: HCUP-NIS was queried for cases including sleeve gastrectomy or Roux-en-Y gastric bypass between 2012 and 2019. Bivariate associations between patient-level factors and MACEs were assessed via Rao-Scott χ 2 tests. Adjusted and unadjusted risks of insurance payor status for MACEs were evaluated using logistic regression., Results: Incidence of MACEs was higher in both Medicare (.75% versus .11%; P < .001) and Medicaid (.15% versus .11%; P < .001) groups than in the PI group. After adjustment for high-risk demographics, high-risk co-morbidities, socioeconomic variables, and hospital factors, insurance status of Medicare (odds ratio [OR]: 1.60, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.23, 2.07; P = .0026) or Medicaid (OR: 1.55, 95% CI: 1.12, 2.16; P = .0026) remained an independent risk factor for MACEs., Conclusions: Our findings underscore the significance of Medicaid/Medicare payor status as an independent predictor of postoperative MACEs in MBS. The results of this study can have a significant impact on deepening our understanding of socioeconomic and health system-related issues that can be targeted to improve outcomes in both MBS and other surgical specialties., (Copyright © 2024 American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Marginal ulceration (MU) following Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) is an established complication, with early MU (within 30-days of operation) being less understood compared to its late counterpart. This study aims to identify risk factors for early MU in patients undergoing primary RYGB., Methods: Utilizing data from the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation Quality Improvement Project (MBSAQIP 2015-2021), 1,346,468 records were evaluated. After exclusions for revisions, conversions, pediatric cases, nonbinary gender, missing body mass index (BMI) data, and missing operative time; 291,625 cases of primary RYGB were included for full analysis and rare events modeling of early MU., Results: The prevalence of early MU was .29% (n = 850). Higher rates of early MU were associated with BMI, race, history of diabetes mellitus (DM), prior thrombotic complications (deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE)), prior percutaneous cardiac intervention (PTC), immunosuppressive therapy, and anticoagulation status. Additionally, procedural aspects like the nonspecialization of the surgeon and longer operative times also correlated with higher early MU rates. Rare-events regression modeling noted significant associations of early MU with younger age, diabetes requiring insulin, history of PTC, DVT, immunosuppressive therapy, and anticoagulation status., Conclusion: Early MU remains a relatively rare complication. The lower than previously reported occurrence suggests possible improvements in both patient preparation and surgical technique. The identification of relevant risk factors enables better perioperative and intraoperative management of patients at risk of developing early MU., (Copyright © 2024 American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The beneficial impacts of metabolic surgery (MS) on patients with heart failure (HF) are incompletely characterized. We aimed to describe the cardiac and metabolic effects of MS in patients with HF and hypothesized that patients with HF would experience both improved metabolic and HF profiles using glycemic control and diuretic dependency as surrogate markers. In this single-center, university-affiliated academic study in the United States, a review of 2,342 hospital records of patients who underwent MS (2017 to 2023) identified 63 patients with a medical history of HF. Preoperative characteristics, 30-day outcomes, and up to 2-year biometric and metabolic outcomes, medication usage, and emergency department utilization were collected. At 24 months, mean body mass index change was -16 kg/m 2 (p <0.001) that corresponded to a mean percentage total body weight loss of 29% (p <0.001). Weight loss was accompanied by significant reductions in hemoglobin A1c (p <0.001) and a 65% decrease in diuretic use at 24 months after surgery (p <0.001). Similarly, emergency visits for cardiac conditions (p = 0.06) and intravenous diuresis (p = 0.07) trended favorably at 1 year after surgery compared with 1 year before surgery but were not statistically significant. In conclusion, in patients with HF who were carefully selected, MS appears to provide significant reduction in oral diuretic dependency, and metabolic improvements with trends toward lower rates of emergency department utilization., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest Dr. Tang has served as consultant for Sequana Medical, Cardiol Therapeutics, Genomics plc, Zehna Therapeutics, WhiteSwell, Kiniksa Pharmaceuticals, Boston Scientific, CardiaTec Biosciences, Intellia Therapeutics, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Alleviant Medical, Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Salubris Biotherapeutics, and BioCardia, and has received honoraria from Springer, Belvoir Media Group, and American Board of Internal Medicine. Dr. Cook has served as consultant for Asensus Surgical, Intuitive Surgical, and Vicarious Surgical. Dr. Schauer reports receiving research grants from Ethicon and Medtronic; receiving personal consulting fees or honoraria from GI Dynamics; Keyron; Persona; Mediflix, Metabolic Health International, LTD, Lilly, Heron, Novo Nordisk, Klens; serving on scientific advisory boards for SE Healthcare Board of Directors; GI Dynamics ; Keyron; Persona; Mediflix, and having ownership interest in SE Healthcare LLC, Mediflix, Metabolic Health International, LTD. The remaining authors have no competing interests to declare., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To examine the renoprotective effects of metabolic surgery in patients with established chronic kidney disease (CKD)., Background: The impact of metabolic surgery compared with glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA) in patients with established CKD has not been fully characterized., Methods: Patients with obesity (body mass index ≥30 kg/m 2 ), type 2 diabetes, and baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) 20-60 mL/min/1.73 m² who underwent metabolic bariatric surgery at a large US health system (2010-2017) were compared with nonsurgical patients who continuously received GLP-1RA. The primary end point was CKD progression, defined as a decline of eGFR by ≥50% or to <15 mL/min/1.73 m 2 , initiation of dialysis, or kidney transplant. The secondary end point was the incident kidney failure (eGFR <15 mL/min/1.73 m 2 , dialysis, or kidney transplant) or all-cause mortality., Results: 425 patients, including 183 patients in the metabolic surgery group and 242 patients in the GLP-1RA group, with a median follow-up of 5.8 years (IQR, 4.4-7.6), were analyzed. The cumulative incidence of the primary end point at 8 years was 21.7% (95% CI: 12.2-30.6) in the surgical group and 45.1% (95% CI: 27.7 to 58.4) in the nonsurgical group, with an adjusted hazard ratio of 0.40 (95% CI: 0.21 to 0.76), P =0.006. The cumulative incidence of the secondary composite end point at 8 years was 24.0% (95% CI: 14.1 to 33.2) in the surgical group and 43.8% (95% CI: 28.1 to 56.1) in the nonsurgical group, with an adjusted HR of 0.56 (95% CI: 0.31 to 0.99), P =0.048., Conclusions: Among patients with type 2 diabetes, obesity, and established CKD, metabolic surgery, compared with GLP-1RA, was significantly associated with a 60% lower risk of progression of kidney impairment and a 44% lower risk of kidney failure or death. Metabolic surgery should be considered as a therapeutic option for patients with CKD and obesity., Competing Interests: A.A. reported receiving grants and personal fees from Medtronic, Eli Lilly, and Ethicon. P.R.S. reported receiving grants from Medtronic and Ethicon, and personal fees from GI Dynamics, Persona, Mediflix, Metabolic Health Institute, Eli Lilly, SE Healthcare, lder, Novo Nordisk, and Heron Advisory Board. R.J.R. reported receiving personal fee from Medtronic, Diagnostic Green, mediCAD simulation GmbH, and Dendrite Imaging and serving as the interim CEO of Dendrite Imaging. S.E.N. reported receiving grants to perform clinical trials from AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, Esperion Therapeutics Inc, Medtronic, MyoKardia, New Amsterdam Pharmaceuticals, Novartis, and Silence Therapeutics. M.B.R. has a consulting relationship with the Blue Cross Blue Shield Association. The remaining authors declare no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Obesity is a common comorbidity among patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) or heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), with the strongest pathophysiologic link of obesity being seen for HFpEF. Lifestyle measures are the cornerstone of weight loss management, but sustainability is a challenge, and there are limited efficacy data in the heart failure (HF) population. Bariatric surgery has moderate efficacy and safety data for patients with preoperative HF or left ventricular dysfunction and has been associated with reductions in HF hospitalizations and medium-term mortality. Antiobesity medications historically carried concerns for cardiovascular adverse effects, but the safety and weight loss efficacy seen in general population trials of glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) and gastric inhibitory polypeptide/GLP-1 agonists are highly encouraging. Although there are safety concerns regarding GLP-1 agonists in advanced HFrEF, trials of the GLP-1 agonist semaglutide for treatment of obesity have confirmed safety and efficacy in patients with HFpEF., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures Dr Schauer has consultancy agreements with GI Dynamics; Keyron; Persona; Mediflix, Metabolic Health International, Lilly, Ethicon, Medtronic, Novo Nordisk, and Heron; ownership interest in SE Healthcare, Mediflix, and Metabolic Health International; and has received research funding from Ethicon and Medtronic. Dr Lavie has been a speaker and consultant for AstraZeneca on an SGLT2i; and has served on a data and safety monitoring board for Novo Nordisk. Dr Mandras has been a consultant and has served on the Speakers Bureaus for Bayer, CVRX, and United Therapeutics. Dr Tang has served as a consultant for Sequana Medical, Cardiol Therapeutics, Genomics, Zehna Therapeutics, Renovacor, WhiteSwell, Kiniksa Pharmaceuticals, Boston Scientific, CardiaTec Biosciences, and Intellia; and has received honoraria from Springer Nature and American Board of Internal Medicine. Dr daSilva-deAbreu owns stocks of TransMedics Group. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2024 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Quality Improvement Project (MBSAQIP) is the largest bariatric surgery-specific clinical data set., Objectives: In 2020, the definition of emergency cases was altered to include only revisional or conversion cases and not primary cases. The aim of this study was to examine how this change affects the utility of the data set for emergency case tracking., Setting: MBSAQIP database., Methods: Emergency cases were extracted from available MBSAQIP data (2015-2021). A comparison of co-morbidity profiles was done, specifically before and after the recent change to how "emergency" is defined in the data set., Results: Eleven thousand and twenty-nine of the 1,048,575 total cases were coded as "emergency cases." From 2015 to 2019, 10,574 emergency cases were performed (∼2115 cases/yr), markedly decreasing in 2020 and 2021 to 455 cases (∼228 cases/yr). Before 2020, the most common procedures were the unlisted procedure of the stomach (45.14%, n = 3101), gastric band removal (25.3%, n = 2676), and reduction of internal hernia (11.8%, n = 1244). Between 2020 and 2021, this distribution changed with Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), the most common emergency procedure (29.23%, n = 133). As expected from the change that captured only revisional cases, the average operative length was greater between 2020 and 2021 (127.6 versus 86.5 min)., Conclusions: Capturable emergency cases declined in 2020, a trend related to changing the definition of emergency as part of MBSAQIP standards. This change excludes data on internal hernia reduction and does not likely reflect a real change in the prevalence of emergency bariatric cases. Because capture for emergency cases has diminished, so has any prior utility of using MBSAQIP data for studying emergency cases., (Copyright © 2024 American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Metabolic surgery (MS) is effective in improving renal parameters for individuals with obesity and chronic kidney disease (CKD). Despite recognized benefits, concerns linger about the perioperative safety of patients with CKD undergoing MS. This study aimed to identify the CKD stage associated with the most significant increase in postoperative complications., Methods: The Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program database (2017-2021) was used to identify patients undergoing laparoscopic gastric sleeve (SG) or Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB). Propensity matching was used to quantify the risk for adverse outcomes associated with progressive CKD stage., Results: In total, 688,583 patients (483,898 without CKD and 204,685 with CKD stages I-V) were examined. Endpoints included length of stay (LOS) >5 days, infection, serious complications, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), and death. Both SG and RYGB exhibited a linear increase in risk of infection and death. For SG, patients who were stage IIIa/IIIb demonstrated the greatest risk for LOS >5 days (odds ratio [OR] 1.23; 95% confidence interval [CI] (1.05-1.45); P = .011), serious complications (OR 2.83; 95% CI 1.87-4.30; P < .001), and MACE (OR 2.82; 95% CI 1.81-4.37; P < .001). For RYGB, patients who were stage IIIa/IIIb the exhibited greatest risk of MACE (OR 1.67; 95% CI 1.06-2.62; P = .027)., Conclusions: Although it is generally accepted that worsening CKD correlates with greater surgical risk, this analysis identified CKD stage III as a major inflection point for risk of LOS >5 days, serious complications, and MACE. These findings are useful for counseling and procedure selection and suggest a need for heightened attention to CKD stage III patients undergoing MS., (Copyright © 2024 American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: With the escalating prevalence of obesity, healthcare providers are increasingly managing patients with a body mass index (BMI) exceeding 70. The aim of this study was to describe the perioperative experiences of this demographic group at two institutions., Methods: An analysis encompassing 84 patients presenting with BMI ≥ 70 kg/m 2 from two institutions was conducted. Data included patient demographics, 30-day postoperative outcomes, and weight-loss at different intervals (30 days, 6 months, 1 year). Additionally, rates of emergency department (ED) utilization, readmission, and reoperation in the first postoperative year were examined., Results: Most patients were black (66.7%) and female (86.9%) with a mean age of 41.7 years. The majority underwent laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (SG, 88.1%). Patients exhibited a marked decrease in BMI (7.84% at 30 days, 20.13% at 6 months, and 26.83% at 1 year). Average length of stay was comparable across procedure (F(3,80) = 0.016, p = .997). While 30-day complications were minimal (0.7%), 14.4% of patients experienced ED visits within 30 days, escalating to 19.6% by six months and 25% at 1 year. Readmission and reoperation rates at 1 year were 6.45% and 4.83%, respectively., Conclusion: With global obesity rates rising, clinicians are being challenged to care for patients with BMI ≥ 70 kg/m 2 . Analysis of two institutions demonstrated low rates of 30-days complications but increased readmission rates and ED utilization in this patient population. Despite increased resource utilization, the study suggests that BMI ≥ 70 kg/m 2 alone should not be a deterrent for surgery, emphasizing the need for nuanced care in this expanding demographic., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Importance: Randomized clinical trials of bariatric surgery have been limited in size, type of surgical procedure, and follow-up duration., Objective: To determine long-term glycemic control and safety of bariatric surgery compared with medical/lifestyle management of type 2 diabetes., Design, Setting, and Participants: ARMMS-T2D (Alliance of Randomized Trials of Medicine vs Metabolic Surgery in Type 2 Diabetes) is a pooled analysis from 4 US single-center randomized trials conducted between May 2007 and August 2013, with observational follow-up through July 2022., Intervention: Participants were originally randomized to undergo either medical/lifestyle management or 1 of the following 3 bariatric surgical procedures: Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, sleeve gastrectomy, or adjustable gastric banding., Main Outcome and Measures: The primary outcome was change in hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) from baseline to 7 years for all participants. Data are reported for up to 12 years., Results: A total of 262 of 305 eligible participants (86%) enrolled in long-term follow-up for this pooled analysis. The mean (SD) age of participants was 49.9 (8.3) years, mean (SD) body mass index was 36.4 (3.5), 68.3% were women, 31% were Black, and 67.2% were White. During follow-up, 25% of participants randomized to undergo medical/lifestyle management underwent bariatric surgery. The median follow-up was 11 years. At 7 years, HbA1c decreased by 0.2% (95% CI, -0.5% to 0.2%), from a baseline of 8.2%, in the medical/lifestyle group and by 1.6% (95% CI, -1.8% to -1.3%), from a baseline of 8.7%, in the bariatric surgery group. The between-group difference was -1.4% (95% CI, -1.8% to -1.0%; P < .001) at 7 years and -1.1% (95% CI, -1.7% to -0.5%; P = .002) at 12 years. Fewer antidiabetes medications were used in the bariatric surgery group. Diabetes remission was greater after bariatric surgery (6.2% in the medical/lifestyle group vs 18.2% in the bariatric surgery group; P = .02) at 7 years and at 12 years (0.0% in the medical/lifestyle group vs 12.7% in the bariatric surgery group; P < .001). There were 4 deaths (2.2%), 2 in each group, and no differences in major cardiovascular adverse events. Anemia, fractures, and gastrointestinal adverse events were more common after bariatric surgery., Conclusion and Relevance: After 7 to 12 years of follow-up, individuals originally randomized to undergo bariatric surgery compared with medical/lifestyle intervention had superior glycemic control with less diabetes medication use and higher rates of diabetes remission., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02328599.

Obesity is a chronic disease that affects more than 650 million adults worldwide. Obesity not only is a significant health concern on its own, but predisposes to cardiometabolic comorbidities, including coronary heart disease, dyslipidemia, hypertension, type 2 diabetes, and some cancers. Lifestyle interventions effectively promote weight loss of 5% to 10%, and pharmacological and surgical interventions even more, with some novel approved drugs inducing up to an average of 25% weight loss. Yet, maintaining weight loss over the long-term remains extremely challenging, and subsequent weight gain is typical. The mechanisms underlying weight regain remain to be fully elucidated. The purpose of this Pennington Biomedical Scientific Symposium was to review and highlight the complex interplay between the physiological, behavioral, and environmental systems controlling energy intake and expenditure. Each of these contributions were further discussed in the context of weight-loss maintenance, and systems-level viewpoints were highlighted to interpret gaps in current approaches. The invited speakers built upon the science of obesity and weight loss to collectively propose future research directions that will aid in revealing the complicated mechanisms involved in the weight-reduced state., (© 2023 The Obesity Society.)

Background: The obesity pandemic has worsened global disease burden, including type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and cancer. Metabolic/bariatric surgery (MBS) is the most effective and durable obesity treatment, but the mechanisms underlying its long-term weight loss efficacy remain unclear. MBS drives substrate oxidation that has been linked to improvements in metabolic function and improved glycemic control that are potentially mediated by mitochondria-a primary site of energy production. As such, augmentation of intestinal mitochondrial function may drive processes underlying the systemic metabolic benefits of MBS. Herein, we applied a highly sensitive technique to evaluate intestinal mitochondrial function ex vivo in a mouse model of MBS., Methods: Mice were randomized to surgery, sham, or non-operative control. A simplified model of MBS, ileal interposition, was performed by interposition of a 2-cm segment of terminal ileum into the proximal bowel 5 mm from the ligament of Treitz. After a four-week recovery period, intestinal mucosa of duodenum, jejunum, ileum, and interposed ileum were assayed for determination of mitochondrial respiratory function. Citrate synthase activity was measured as a marker of mitochondrial content., Results: Ileal interposition was well tolerated and associated with modest body weight loss and transient hypophagia relative to controls. Mitochondrial capacity declined in the native duodenum and jejunum of animals following ileal interposition relative to controls, although respiration remained unchanged in these segments. Similarly, ileal interposition lowered citrate synthase activity in the duodenum and jejunum following relative to controls but ileal function remained constant across all groups., Conclusion: Ileal interposition decreases mitochondrial volume in the proximal intestinal mucosa of mice. This change in concentration with preserved respiration suggests a global mucosal response to segment specific nutrition signals in the distal bowel. Future studies are required to understand the causes underlying these mitochondrial changes., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Background: Obesity contributes significant disease burden worldwide, including diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and cancer. While bariatric surgery is the most effective and durable obesity treatment, the mechanisms underlying its effects remain unknown. Although neuro-hormonal mechanisms have been suspected to mediate at least some of the gut-brain axis changes following bariatric surgery, studies examining the intestine and its regionally specific post-gastric alterations to these signals remain unclear., Materials and Methods: Vagus nerve recording was performed following the implantation of duodenal feeding tubes in mice. Testing conditions and measurements were made under anesthesia during baseline, nutrient or vehicle solution delivery, and post-delivery. Solutions tested included water, glucose, glucose with an inhibitor of glucose absorption (phlorizin), and a hydrolyzed protein solution., Results: Vagus nerve signaling was detectable from the duodenum and exhibited stable baseline activity without responding to osmotic pressure gradients. Duodenal-delivered glucose and protein robustly increased vagus nerve signaling, but increased signaling was abolished during the co-administration of glucose and phlorizin., Discussion: Gut-brain communication via the vagus nerve emanating from the duodenum is nutrient sensitive and easily measurable in mice. Examination of these signaling pathways may help elucidate how the nutrient signals from the intestine are altered when applied to obesity and bariatric surgery mouse models. Future studies will address quantifying the changes in neuroendocrine nutrient signals in health and obesity, with specific emphasis on identifying the changes associated with bariatric surgery and other gastrointestinal surgery.

Long-term remission of type 2 diabetes following lifestyle intervention or pharmacotherapy, even in patients with mild disease, is rare. Long-term remission following metabolic surgery however, is common and occurs in 23% to 98% depending on disease severity and type of surgery. Remission after surgery is associated with excellent glycemic control without reliance on pharmacotherapy, improvements in quality of life, and major reductions in microvascular and macrovascular complications. For patients with type 2 diabetes, early intervention with metabolic surgery, when beta cell function still remains intact, provides the greatest probability of long-term remission as high as 90% or more., Competing Interests: Disclosure Dr P.R. Schauer has the following relationships Consultancy Agreements: GI Dynamics; Keyron; Persona; Mediflix, Metabolic Health International, LTD, Novo Nordisk and Lilly Ownership Interest: SE Healthcare LLC, Mediflix, Metabolic Health International, LTD Research Funding: Ethicon; Medtronic; Pacira; Persona Honoraria: Ethicon; Medtronic; BD Surgical; Gore Scientific Advisor or Membership: SE Healthcare Board of Directors; GI Dynamics; Keyron; Persona; Mediflix. Dr Z.N. Hanipah has consultancy agreement with Novo Nordisk. Dr F. Rubino has the following relationships Research grants: Ethicon and Medtronic Consulting fees: Ethicon, Novo Nordisk, and Medtronic Scientific advisory board: GI Dynamics and Keyron., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Recent examination of trends in postoperative major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACE) following bariatric surgery, including accredited and nonaccredited centers, and the factors affecting those trends, is lacking., Objectives: The objective of this study was to evaluate current trends for postoperative MACE after bariatric surgery in both accredited and nonaccredited centers and the factors affecting these trends., Setting: This retrospective study was conducted using National Inpatient Sample database from 2012 to 2019., Methods: All patients who underwent inpatient laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG), open sleeve gastrectomy (SG), laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB), and open Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) were examined. Composite MACE (acute myocardial infarction, cardiac arrest, acute stroke, and in-hospital death during bariatric surgery hospitalization) was calculated and analyzed over time along with patient demographic and co-morbid diseases using survey-weighted logistic regression., Results: MACE incidence was lowest for LSG (0.07%), followed by LRYGB (0.16%), SG (3.47%), and RYBG (3.51%). Open procedure, increasing age, male sex, body mass index ≥50, coronary artery disease, congestive heart failure, and chronic kidney disease were independent predictors for increased MACE risk. MACE incidence increased over time for SG (odds ratio [OR] 1.25 [1.16, 1.34]; P < .0001) and RYGB (OR 1.14 [1.06, 1.22]; P = .0004) but decreased for LRYGB (OR 0.93 [0.87, 1] P = .06). After adjustment for high-risk covariates, increased MACE trend seen over time was attenuated in SG (OR 1.13 [1.04-1.22]; P = .005) and RYGB (OR 1.04 [0.96-1.12]; P = .36), while there was minimal effect of these high-risk covariates on MACE trend over time in LSG and LRYGB., Conclusions: MACE following LSG and LRYGB is rare, occurring in 0.1% of patients. Persistently increasing high-risk conditions and demographics has had minimal effect on MACE over time for LSG and LRYGB but has had significant effect on MACE trend over time in SG and RYGB., (Copyright © 2023 American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The National Kidney Foundation (NKF) and The Obesity Society (TOS) cosponsored a multispecialty international workshop in April 2021 to advance the understanding and management of obesity in adults with chronic kidney disease (CKD). The underlying rationale for the workshop was the accumulating evidence that obesity is a major contributor to CKD and adverse outcomes in individuals with CKD, and that effective treatment of obesity, including lifestyle intervention, weight loss medications, and metabolic surgery, can have beneficial effects. The attendees included a range of experts in the areas of kidney disease, obesity medicine, endocrinology, diabetes, bariatric/metabolic surgery, endoscopy, transplant surgery, and nutrition, as well as patients with obesity and CKD. The group identified strategies to increase patient and provider engagement in obesity management, outlined a collaborative action plan to engage nephrologists and obesity medicine experts in obesity management, and identified research opportunities to address gaps in knowledge about the interaction between obesity and kidney disease. The workshop's conclusions help lay the groundwork for development of an effective, scientifically based, and multidisciplinary approach to the management of obesity in people with CKD., (Copyright © 2022 National Kidney Foundation, Inc and The Obesity Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The obesity pandemic continues to contribute to a worsening burden of disease worldwide. The link between obesity and diseases such as diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and cancer has been well established, yet most patients living with obesity remain untreated or undertreated. Metabolic and bariatric surgery is the most effective and durable treatment for obesity, is safe, and may have a protective benefit with respect to cancer incidence. In this review, an overview of the link between obesity, metabolic surgery, and cancer is discussed with emphasis on indications for endometrial cancer, the malignancy most strongly associated with obesity. Considerable evidence from retrospective and prospective cohort studies supports a decreased risk of endometrial cancer in patients with obesity who undergo bariatric surgery compared with nonsurgical controls. Survivors of endometrial cancer are at increased risk of poor health outcomes associated with obesity, and women with endometrial cancer are more likely to die of cardiovascular disease and other obesity-related illnesses than of the malignancy itself. Recent advances in anticancer drug therapies have targeted pathways that may also be therapeutically altered with metabolic surgery. Metabolic surgery has significant potential to enter the treatment paradigm for endometrial cancer, and gynecologic oncologist visits present an opportunity to identify patients who may benefit the most., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (© 2022 Ross, Akinde, Schauer, le Roux, Brennan, Jernigan, Bueter and Albaugh.)

Objective: The overall aim of the Alliance of Randomized Trials of Medicine versus Metabolic Surgery in Type 2 Diabetes (ARMMS-T2D) consortium is to assess the durability and longer-term effectiveness of metabolic surgery compared with medical/lifestyle management in patients with type 2 diabetes (NCT02328599)., Research Design and Methods: A total of 316 patients with type 2 diabetes previously randomly assigned to surgery (N = 195) or medical/lifestyle therapy (N = 121) in the STAMPEDE, TRIABETES, SLIMM-T2D, and CROSSROADS trials were enrolled into this prospective observational cohort. The primary outcome was the rate of diabetes remission (hemoglobin A1c [HbA1c] ≤6.5% for 3 months without usual glucose-lowering therapy) at 3 years. Secondary outcomes included glycemic control, body weight, biomarkers, and comorbidity reduction., Results: Three-year data were available for 256 patients with mean 50 ± 8.3 years of age, BMI 36.5 ± 3.6 kg/m2, and duration of diabetes 8.8 ± 5.7 years. Diabetes remission was achieved in more participants following surgery than medical/lifestyle intervention (60 of 160 [37.5%] vs. 2 of 76 [2.6%], respectively; P < 0.001). Reductions in HbA1c (Δ = -1.9 ± 2.0 vs. -0.1 ± 2.0%; P < 0.001), fasting plasma glucose (Δ = -52 [-105, -5] vs. -12 [-48, 26] mg/dL; P < 0.001), and BMI (Δ = -8.0 ± 3.6 vs. -1.8 ± 2.9 kg/m2; P < 0.001) were also greater after surgery. The percentages of patients using medications to control diabetes, hypertension, and dyslipidemia were all lower after surgery (P < 0.001)., Conclusions: Three-year follow-up of the largest cohort of randomized patients followed to date demonstrates that metabolic/bariatric surgery is more effective and durable than medical/lifestyle intervention in remission of type 2 diabetes, including among individuals with class I obesity, for whom surgery is not widely used., (© 2022 by the American Diabetes Association.)

Aims: Long-term data from randomized clinical trials comparing metabolic (bariatric) surgery versus a medical/lifestyle intervention for treatment of patients with obesity/overweight and type 2 diabetes (T2D) are lacking. The Alliance of Randomized Trials of Medicine vs Metabolic Surgery in Type 2 Diabetes (ARMMS-T2D) is a consortium of four randomized trials designed to compare long-term efficacy and safety of surgery versus medical/lifestyle therapy on diabetes control and clinical outcomes., Materials and Methods: Patients with T2D and body mass index (BMI) of 27-45 kg/m 2 who were previously randomized to metabolic surgery (Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, adjustable gastric band, or sleeve gastrectomy) versus medical/lifestyle intervention in the STAMPEDE, SLIMM-T2D, TRIABETES, or CROSSROADS trials have been enrolled in ARMMS-T2D for observational follow-up. The primary outcome is change in glycated haemoglobin after a minimum 7 years of follow-up, with additional analyses to determine rates of diabetes remission and relapse, as well as cardiovascular and renal endpoints., Results: In total, 302 patients (192 surgical, 110 medical/lifestyle) previously randomized in the four parent studies were eligible for participation in the ARMMS-T2D observational study. Participant demographics were 71% white, 27% African-American and 68% female. At baseline: age, 50 ± 8 years; BMI, 36.5 ± 3.5 kg/m 2 ; duration of diabetes, 8.8 ± 5.6 years; glycated haemoglobin, 8.6% ± 1.6%; and fasting glucose, 168 ± 64 mg/dl. More than 35% of patients had a BMI <35 kg/m 2 ., Conclusions: ARMMS-T2D will provide the largest body of long-term, level 1 evidence to inform clinical decision-making regarding the comparative durability, efficacy and safety of metabolic surgery relative to a medical/lifestyle intervention among patients with T2D, including those with milder class I obesity or mere overweight., (© 2022 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Importance: Obesity increases the incidence and mortality from some types of cancer, but it remains uncertain whether intentional weight loss can decrease this risk., Objective: To investigate whether bariatric surgery is associated with lower cancer risk and mortality in patients with obesity., Design, Setting, and Participants: In the SPLENDID (Surgical Procedures and Long-term Effectiveness in Neoplastic Disease Incidence and Death) matched cohort study, adult patients with a body mass index of 35 or greater who underwent bariatric surgery at a US health system between 2004 and 2017 were included. Patients who underwent bariatric surgery were matched 1:5 to patients who did not undergo surgery for their obesity, resulting in a total of 30 318 patients. Follow-up ended in February 2021., Exposures: Bariatric surgery (n = 5053), including Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy, vs nonsurgical care (n = 25 265)., Main Outcomes and Measures: Multivariable Cox regression analysis estimated time to incident obesity-associated cancer (a composite of 13 cancer types as the primary end point) and cancer-related mortality., Results: The study included 30 318 patients (median age, 46 years; median body mass index, 45; 77% female; and 73% White) with a median follow-up of 6.1 years (IQR, 3.8-8.9 years). The mean between-group difference in body weight at 10 years was 24.8 kg (95% CI, 24.6-25.1 kg) or a 19.2% (95% CI, 19.1%-19.4%) greater weight loss in the bariatric surgery group. During follow-up, 96 patients in the bariatric surgery group and 780 patients in the nonsurgical control group had an incident obesity-associated cancer (incidence rate of 3.0 events vs 4.6 events, respectively, per 1000 person-years). The cumulative incidence of the primary end point at 10 years was 2.9% (95% CI, 2.2%-3.6%) in the bariatric surgery group and 4.9% (95% CI, 4.5%-5.3%) in the nonsurgical control group (absolute risk difference, 2.0% [95% CI, 1.2%-2.7%]; adjusted hazard ratio, 0.68 [95% CI, 0.53-0.87], P = .002). Cancer-related mortality occurred in 21 patients in the bariatric surgery group and 205 patients in the nonsurgical control group (incidence rate of 0.6 events vs 1.2 events, respectively, per 1000 person-years). The cumulative incidence of cancer-related mortality at 10 years was 0.8% (95% CI, 0.4%-1.2%) in the bariatric surgery group and 1.4% (95% CI, 1.1%-1.6%) in the nonsurgical control group (absolute risk difference, 0.6% [95% CI, 0.1%-1.0%]; adjusted hazard ratio, 0.52 [95% CI, 0.31-0.88], P = .01)., Conclusions and Relevance: Among adults with obesity, bariatric surgery compared with no surgery was associated with a significantly lower incidence of obesity-associated cancer and cancer-related mortality.

Importance: No therapy has been shown to reduce the risk of serious adverse outcomes in patients with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH)., Objective: To investigate the long-term relationship between bariatric surgery and incident major adverse liver outcomes and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in patients with obesity and biopsy-proven fibrotic NASH without cirrhosis., Design, Setting, and Participants: In the SPLENDOR (Surgical Procedures and Long-term Effectiveness in NASH Disease and Obesity Risk) study, of 25 828 liver biopsies performed at a US health system between 2004 and 2016, 1158 adult patients with obesity were identified who fulfilled enrollment criteria, including confirmed histological diagnosis of NASH and presence of liver fibrosis (histological stages 1-3). Baseline clinical characteristics, histological disease activity, and fibrosis stage of patients who underwent simultaneous liver biopsy at the time of bariatric surgery were balanced with a nonsurgical control group using overlap weighting methods. Follow-up ended in March 2021., Exposures: Bariatric surgery (Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, sleeve gastrectomy) vs nonsurgical care., Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcomes were the incidence of major adverse liver outcomes (progression to clinical or histological cirrhosis, development of hepatocellular carcinoma, liver transplantation, or liver-related mortality) and MACE (a composite of coronary artery events, cerebrovascular events, heart failure, or cardiovascular death), estimated using the Firth penalized method in a multivariable-adjusted Cox regression analysis framework., Results: A total of 1158 patients (740 [63.9%] women; median age, 49.8 years [IQR, 40.9-57.9 years], median body mass index, 44.1 [IQR, 39.4-51.4]), including 650 patients who underwent bariatric surgery and 508 patients in the nonsurgical control group, with a median follow-up of 7 years (IQR, 4-10 years) were analyzed. Distribution of baseline covariates, including histological severity of liver injury, was well-balanced after overlap weighting. At the end of the study period in the unweighted data set, 5 patients in the bariatric surgery group and 40 patients in the nonsurgical control group experienced major adverse liver outcomes, and 39 patients in the bariatric surgery group and 60 patients in the nonsurgical group experienced MACE. Among the patients analyzed with overlap weighting methods, the cumulative incidence of major adverse liver outcomes at 10 years was 2.3% (95% CI, 0%-4.6%) in the bariatric surgery group and 9.6% (95% CI, 6.1%-12.9%) in the nonsurgical group (adjusted absolute risk difference, 12.4% [95% CI, 5.7%-19.7%]; adjusted hazard ratio, 0.12 [95% CI, 0.02-0.63]; P = .01). The cumulative incidence of MACE at 10 years was 8.5% (95% CI, 5.5%-11.4%) in the bariatric surgery group and 15.7% (95% CI, 11.3%-19.8%) in the nonsurgical group (adjusted absolute risk difference, 13.9% [95% CI, 5.9%-21.9%]; adjusted hazard ratio, 0.30 [95% CI, 0.12-0.72]; P = .007). Within the first year after bariatric surgery, 4 patients (0.6%) died from surgical complications, including gastrointestinal leak (n = 2) and respiratory failure (n = 2)., Conclusions and Relevance: Among patients with NASH and obesity, bariatric surgery, compared with nonsurgical management, was associated with a significantly lower risk of incident major adverse liver outcomes and MACE.

Hypertension is a major risk factor for cardiovascular and renal diseases in the United States and worldwide. Obesity accounts for much of the risk for primary hypertension through several mechanisms, including neurohormonal activation, inflammation, and kidney dysfunction. As the prevalence of obesity continues to increase, hypertension and associated cardiorenal diseases will also increase unless more effective strategies to prevent and treat obesity are developed. Lifestyle modification, including diet, reduced sedentariness, and increased physical activity, is usually recommended for patients with obesity; however, the long-term success of these strategies for reducing adiposity, maintaining weight loss, and reducing blood pressure has been limited. Effective pharmacotherapeutic and procedural strategies, including metabolic surgeries, are additional options to treat obesity and prevent or attenuate obesity hypertension, target organ damage, and subsequent disease. Medications can be useful for short- and long-term obesity treatment; however, prescription of these drugs is limited. Metabolic surgery is effective for producing sustained weight loss and for treating hypertension and metabolic disorders in many patients with severe obesity. Unanswered questions remain related to the mechanisms of obesity-related diseases, long-term efficacy of different treatment and prevention strategies, and timing of these interventions to prevent obesity and hypertension-mediated target organ damage. Further investigation, including randomized controlled trials, is essential to addressing these questions, and emphasis should be placed on the prevention of obesity to reduce the burden of hypertensive cardiovascular and kidney diseases and subsequent mortality.

Objective: To determine which one of the two most common metabolic surgical procedures is associated with greater reduction in risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and obesity., Research Design and Methods: A total of 13,490 patients including 1,362 Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), 693 sleeve gastrectomy (SG), and 11,435 matched nonsurgical patients with T2DM and obesity who received their care at the Cleveland Clinic (1998-2017) were analyzed, with follow-up through December 2018. With multivariable Cox regression analysis we estimated time to incident extended MACE, defined as first occurrence of coronary artery events, cerebrovascular events, heart failure, nephropathy, atrial fibrillation, and all-cause mortality., Results: The cumulative incidence of the primary end point at 5 years was 13.7% (95% CI 11.4-15.9) in the RYGB groups and 24.7% (95% CI 19.0-30.0) in the SG group, with an adjusted hazard ratio (HR) of 0.77 (95% CI 0.60-0.98, P = 0.04). Of the six individual end points, RYGB was associated with a significantly lower cumulative incidence of nephropathy at 5 years compared with SG (2.8% vs. 8.3%, respectively; HR 0.47 [95% CI 0.28-0.79], P = 0.005). Furthermore, RYGB was associated with a greater reduction in body weight, glycated hemoglobin, and use of medications to treat diabetes and cardiovascular diseases. Five years after RYGB, patients required more upper endoscopy (45.8% vs. 35.6%, P < 0.001) and abdominal surgical procedures (10.8% vs. 5.4%, P = 0.001) compared with SG., Conclusions: In patients with obesity and T2DM, RYGB may be associated with greater weight loss, better diabetes control, and lower risk of MACE and nephropathy compared with SG., (© 2021 by the American Diabetes Association.)

Introduction: Patients with type 2 diabetes experience resolution of hyperglycemia within days after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) surgery. This is attributed, in part, to enhanced secretion of hindgut factors following exclusion of the gastric remnant and proximal intestine during surgery. However, evidence of the mechanisms of remission remain limited due to the challenges of metabolic evaluation during the early postoperative period. The purpose of this investigation was to determine the role of foregut exclusion in the resolution of type 2 diabetes after RYGB., Methods: Patients with type 2 diabetes (n = 15) undergoing RYGB had a gastrostomy tube (G-tube) placed in their gastric remnant at time of surgery. Patients were randomized to receive a mixed meal tolerance test via oral or G-tube feeding immediately prior to and 2 weeks after surgery in a repeated measures crossover design. Plasma glucose, insulin, C-peptide, incretin responses, and indices of meal-stimulated insulin secretion and sensitivity were determined., Results: Body weight, fat mass, fasting glucose and insulin, and circulating lipids were significantly decreased 2 weeks after surgery. The glycemic response to feeding was reduced as a function of total area under the curve but not after adjustment for the reduction in fasting glucose. Oral feeding significantly enhanced insulin and incretin secretion after RYGB, which was entirely ablated by G-tube feeding., Conclusion: Foregut exclusion accounts for the rise in incretin and insulin secretion but may not fully explain the early improvements in glucose metabolism after RYGB surgery., (© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Endocrine Society. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate the long-term effects of medical and surgical treatments of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) on patient-reported outcomes (PROs)., Background: Robust data on PROs from randomized trials comparing medical and surgical treatments for T2DM are lacking., Methods: The Surgical Treatment And Medications Potentially Eradicate Diabetes Efficiently (STAMPEDE) trial showed that 5 years after randomization, Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) and sleeve gastrectomy (SG) were superior to intensive medical therapy (IMT) alone in achieving glycemic control in patients with T2DM and obesity. A subset of 104 patients participating in the STAMPEDE trial were administered two generic health-related quality of life (QoL) questionnaires (RAND-36 and EQ-5D-3L) and a diabetes-specific instrument at baseline, and then on an annual basis up to 5 years after randomization., Results: On longitudinal analysis, RYGB and SG significantly improved the domains of physical functioning, general health perception, energy/fatigue, and diabetes-related QoL compared with IMT group. In the IMT group, none of the QoL components in the generic questionnaires improved significantly from baseline. No significant long-term differences were observed among the study groups in measures of psychological and social aspects of QoL. On multivariable analysis, independent factors associated with improved general health perception at long-term included baseline general health (P < 0.001), insulin independence at 5 years (P = 0.005), RYGB versus IMT (P = 0.005), and SG versus IMT (P = 0.034). Favorable changes following RYGB and SG were comparable., Conclusions: In patients with T2DM, metabolic surgery is associated with long-term favorable changes in certain PROs compared with IMT, mainly on physical health and diabetes-related domains. Psychosocial well-being warrants greater attention after metabolic surgery., Competing Interests: The authors report no direct conflicts of interests., (Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Description: Endoscopic techniques are paramount in the identification and management of complications after surgery, though collaboration with other specialties is obligatory. Unfortunately, the evaluation and treatment algorithms are not standardized and there is a paucity of high-quality prospective studies to provide clarity regarding the best approach. The purpose of this clinical practice update is to apprise the clinician with respect to the endoscopic evaluation and management of patients with early (<90 days) complications after undergoing bariatric/metabolic surgery., Methods: The best practice advice outlined in this expert review are based on available published evidence, including observational studies and systematic reviews, and incorporates expert opinion where applicable. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 1: Clinicians performing endoscopic approaches to treat early major postoperative complications should do so in a multidisciplinary manner with interventional radiology and bariatric/metabolic surgery co-managing the patient. Daily communication is advised. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 2: Clinicians embarking on incorporating endoscopic management of bariatric/metabolic surgical complications into their clinical practice should have a comprehensive knowledge of the indications, contraindications, risks, benefits, and outcomes of each of the endoscopic treatment techniques. They should also have knowledge of the risks and benefits of alternative methods such as surgical and interventional radiological based approaches. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 3: Clinicians incorporating endoscopic management of bariatric/metabolic surgical complications into their clinical practice should have expertise in interventional endoscopy techniques, including but not limited to: using concomitant fluoroscopy, stent deployment and retrieval, managing stenosis, and managing percutaneous drains. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 4: Clinicians should screen all patients undergoing endoscopic management of bariatric/metabolic surgical complications and dietary intolerance for comorbid medical (nutrient deficiencies, infection, pulmonary embolism) and psychological (depression, anxiety) conditions. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 5: Endoscopic approaches to managing complications of bariatric/metabolic surgery may be considered for patients in the immediate, early and late postoperative periods depending on hemodynamic stability. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 6: Clinicians incorporating endoscopic management of bariatric/metabolic surgical complications into their clinical practice should have a detailed understanding of the pathophysiologic mechanisms initiating and perpetuating conditions such as staple-line leaks. This will allow for a prompt diagnosis and appropriate therapy to be targeted not only at the area of interest, but also any concomitant downstream stenosis. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 7: Clinicians should recognize that the goal for endoscopic management of staple-line leaks are often not necessarily initial closure of the leak site, but rather techniques to promote drainage of material from the perigastric collection into the gastric lumen such that the leak site closes by secondary intention., (Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Metabolic surgery has beneficial metabolic effects, including remission of type 2 diabetes. We hypothesized that duodenojejunal bypass (DJB) surgery can protect against development of type 1 diabetes (T1D) by enhancing regulation of cellular and molecular pathways that control glucose homeostasis., Methods: BBDP/Wor rats, which are prone to develop spontaneous autoimmune T1D, underwent loop DJB (n = 15) or sham (n = 15) surgery at a median age of 41 days, before development of diabetes. At T1D diagnosis, a subcutaneous insulin pellet was implanted, oral glucose tolerance test was performed 21 days later, and tissues were collected 25 days after onset of T1D. Pancreas and liver tissues were assessed by histology and RT-qPCR. Fecal microbiota composition was analyzed by 16S V4 sequencing., Results: Postoperatively, DJB rats weighed less than sham rats (287.8 vs 329.9 g, P = 0.04). In both groups, 14 of 15 rats developed T1D, at similar age of onset (87 days in DJB vs 81 days in sham, P = 0.17). There was no difference in oral glucose tolerance, fasting and stimulated plasma insulin and c-peptide levels, and immunohistochemical analysis of insulin-positive cells in the pancreas. DJB rats needed 1.3 ± 0.4 insulin implants vs 1.9 ± 0.5 in sham rats (P = 0.002). Fasting and glucose stimulated glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) secretion was elevated after DJB surgery. DJB rats had reduced markers of metabolic stress in liver. After DJB, the fecal microbiome changed significantly, including increases in Akkermansia and Ruminococcus, while the changes were minimal in sham rats., Conclusion: DJB does not protect against autoimmune T1D in BBDP/Wor rats, but reduces the need for exogenous insulin and facilitates other metabolic benefits including weight loss, increased GLP-1 secretion, reduced hepatic stress, and altered gut microbiome.