Search

Objectives: To explore the views of patients and healthcare providers on current rehabilitation after lumbar fusion surgery (LFS) to fuel the development of a novel rehabilitation care pathway., Design: A cross-sectional, qualitative study with an interpretive descriptive design., Setting: Academic and non-academic hospital setting in Belgium., Participants: 31 caregivers from (non)-academic settings and 5 patients with LFS were purposefully sampled and in-depth interviewed., Results: Out of the data of all interviews, participants reported opinions on 23 thematic clusters that were expressed in a time-contingent manner from the preoperative, perioperative to postoperative phase. Afterwards, themes were mapped to the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research, with a larger role for concepts related to the innovation, inner and individual domain. As an overarching theme, the importance of an 'individualised, patient-centred rehabilitation built on a strong therapeutic alliance with an accessible interprofessional team' was stressed for patients undergoing LFS. Specifically, participants stated that a biopsychosocial approach to rehabilitation should start in the preoperative phase and immediately be continued postoperatively. No consensus was observed for movement restrictions postoperatively. Uniform communication between the involved caregivers was considered essential for optimal therapeutic alliance and clinical outcome. The precise role and competence of each member of the interprofessional team needs, therefore, to be clearly defined, respected and discussed. An accessible case manager to guide the patient trajectory and tackle problems could further support this. Interestingly, only patients, psychologists and physiotherapists addressed return to work as an important outcome after LFS., Conclusions: This qualitative study identified key experiences and points to consider in the current and future rehabilitation pathway for LFS. Future research should incorporate these findings to build a novel rehabilitation pathway for LFS and evaluate its feasibility and cost-effectiveness., Trial Registration Number: This study was registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03427294)., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

The purpose of this prospective mono-centric case series study is to investigate the mid-term (minimum follow-up 24 months) safety and efficacy using a new "zero-profile" stand-alone cage with integrated angle-stable fixation in single- and multilevel anterior cervical fusions. 53 consecutive patients with radiculopathy/myelopathy at one to three levels underwent an anterior cervical discectomy and fusion procedure using the "zero-profile" implant (97 levels operated). A CT-scan at 12-months was taken to assess fusion status, implant failure, subsidence and migration. The overall fusion rate was 97%. 3 out of 45 patients (6.6%) complained about mild dysphagia related symptoms at 24 months follow-up . There was no recorded incidence of hardware failure. The new cervical stand-alone anterior fusion device allows a safe anterior cervical decompression and stabilisation, a low rate of chronic dysphagia and achieves a high fusion rate. Prospective randomised trials are necessary to confirm these results.

Parsonage-Turner syndrome (PTS) is a distinct clinical syndrome, characterized by acute and severe (mostly) unilateral shoulder pain, followed by paresis and atrophy of the shoulder girdle, while the pain decreases. Most authors consider it as an immune-mediated disorder. PTS is notoriously unrecognised and is usually diagnosed with delay. A PTS may also occur following a surgical procedure. Postsurgical PTS is an under-recognised and challenging clinical entity, as illustrated in the case reported here of a 59-year-old man, 4 weeks after anterior discectomy and fusion C5C7. In such cases, the differential diagnosis must be made with a complication of surgery, such as postoperative C5 palsy due for instance to a migrated bone graft. Arguments for PTS are: a certain delay between surgery and symptoms, intolerable pain followed by weakness and improvement of pain complaints, divergent distribution of weakness, sensory deficit and pain, which may be confirmed by electrodiagnosis. Early recognition of postsurgical PTS may avoid unnecessary investigations or surgical exploration. It allows to treat the patient properly, leading to greater satisfaction of both surgeon and patient; pain management, physical therapy and reassurance are the cornerstones.