Search

1 april 2012, Item does not contain fulltext, BACKGROUND: Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected individuals show large interindividual variation in response to antiretroviral therapy. Efavirenz (EFV) and nevirapine (NVP) are nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors, which are prescribed in combination with other antiretroviral therapy in so-called highly active antiretroviral therapy. Recent studies provide evidence for the role of cytochrome P450 (CYP) genes, in particular CYP2B6, in relation to EFV and NVP pharmacokinetics. In this study, the authors investigated whether common ABCB1, CYP2A6, CYP2B6, CYP2D6, and CYP3A5 alleles are associated with plasma concentrations of EFV and NVP in HIV-infected individuals. METHODS: Plasma drug concentrations were quantified by high-performance liquid chromatography in 143 HIV-infected individuals receiving either EFV or NVP. Genotyping for common alleles was performed by restriction fragment length polymorphism and Taqman assays. Individuals were genotyped for 11 single-nucleotide polymorphisms in 5 genes. CYP2B6 haplotypes were reconstructed by PHASE. RESULTS: Plasma EFV concentrations were positively associated with CYP2B6 c.516G>T, c.785A>G, and c.983A>G single-nucleotide polymorphisms in HIV-infected individuals. Increased plasma concentrations of EFV and NVP were present in individuals with the CYP2B6*6/*6 or *6/*18 haplotype compared with CYP2B6*1/*1 [increase of 62% (95% confidence interval, 44.0-80.1) and 24% (95% confidence interval, 7.0-40.0), respectively, P < 0.01]. No significant association with other genes in relation to EFV or NVP concentrations was found. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, a strong association of CYP2B6*6 and CYP2B6*18 alleles in relation to EFV and NVP plasma concentrations was found, which confirmed previous studies.

The therapeutic potential of the highly active anticancer agent cisplatin is severely limited by the occurrence of cellular resistance. A better understanding of the molecular pathways involved in cisplatin-induced cell death could potentially indicate ways to overcome cellular unresponsiveness to the drug and thus lead to better treatment results. We used the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae as a model organism to identify and characterize novel genes involved in cisplatin-induced cell kill, and found that SKY1 (SR-protein-specific kinase from budding yeast) is a cisplatin sensitivity gene whose disruption conferred cisplatin resistance. In cross-resistance studies, we observed resistance of yeast sky1 Delta cells (i.e., cells from which the SKY1 gene had been disrupted) to cisplatin, carboplatin (but not oxaliplatin), doxorubicin and daunorubicin, and hypersensitivity to cadmium chloride and 5-fluorouracil. Furthermore, these cells did not display reduced platinum accumulation, DNA platination or doxorubicin accumulation, indicating that the resistance is unrelated to decreased drug import or increased drug export. Based on the modification of the anticancer drug sensitivity profile and our finding that sky1 Delta cells display a mutator phenotype, we propose that Sky1p might play a significant role in specific repair and/or tolerance pathways. Disruption of the S. cerevisiae SKY1 gene would thus result in deregulation of such mechanisms and, consequently, lead to altered drug sensitivity.

The therapeutic potential of cisplatin, one of the most active and widely used anticancer drugs, is severely limited by the occurrence of cellular resistance. In this study, using budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae as a model organism to identify novel drug resistance genes, we found that disruption of the yeast gene SKY1 (serine/arginine-rich protein-specific kinase from budding yeast) by either transposon insertion or one-step gene replacement conferred cellular resistance to cisplatin. Heterologous expression of the human SKY1 homologue SRPK1 (serine/arginine-rich protein-specific kinase) in SKY1 deletion mutant yeast cells restored cisplatin sensitivity, suggesting that SRPK1 is a cisplatin sensitivity gene, the inactivation of which could lead to cisplatin resistance. Subsequently, we investigated the role of SRPK1 in cisplatin sensitivity and resistance in human ovarian carcinoma A2780 cells using antisense oligodeoxynucleotides. Treatment of A2780 cells with antisense oligodeoxynucleotides directed against the translation initiation site of SRPK1 led to down-regulation of SRPK1 protein and conferred a 4-fold resistance to cisplatin. The human SRPK1 gene has not been associated with drug resistance before. Our new findings strongly suggest that SRPK1 is involved in cisplatin-induced cell kill and indicate that SRPK1 might potentially be of importance for studying clinical drug resistance.