Search

Simple Summary: Nasal vestibule cancer is considered to be a rare form of cancer. There are several different staging systems in place for categorizing these tumors, which can result in inconsistencies and unreliable data due to variations in registration. The "Rome" classification is the most recent addition. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of this new staging system and to compare it to the UICC/AJCC system. One hundred and forty-nine patients with a squamous cell carcinoma of the nasal vestibule were included. There was a significant association between an increased disease stage as staged per the Rome classification and decreased survival. This association persisted when correcting for various covariates (i.e., age at the time of diagnosis, sex, the presence of lymph node metastases, and treatment modality) in multivariable analysis. The Rome classification appears to be capable of adequately categorizing and stratifying patients for different outcome measures. Nevertheless, additional research with a larger number of patients is required before any definitive conclusions can be drawn. Squamous cell carcinoma of the nasal vestibule is considered a rare malignancy that differs from other sinonasal malignancies in many respects. Four staging systems currently exist for this disease, the most recent addition being the "Rome" classification. This study assesses the use of this new classification and its prognostic value regarding various outcome measures. A retrospective multicenter cohort study of patients with a primary squamous cell carcinoma of the nasal vestibule who were treated in three tertiary head and neck oncology referral centers was conducted. A total of 149 patients were included. The median follow-up duration was 27 months. Five-year locoregional control (LRC), disease-specific survival (DSS), and overall survival (OS) were 81.6%, 90.1, and 62.5% respectively. A statistically significant association was observed between the Rome classification and all survival outcomes in both univariable and multivariable analyses. Moreover, it appeared to perform better than the Union for International Cancer Control TNM classification for tumors of the nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses. The new Rome classification can be used effectively and is associated with LRC, DSS, and OS. However, it requires further validation in a larger (prospective) study population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Cancer of the nasal vestibule is thought to be rare. Multiple staging systems exist for the staging of these tumors, which can lead to variability and, therefore, the poor reliability of data. This retrospective study aimed to evaluate these staging systems. One hundred and forty-eight patients with carcinoma of the nasal vestibule were included and re-staged per the available staging systems. Stage distribution varied widely between the four evaluated staging systems. The classification per Bussu et al. had the most balanced allocation of patients amongst the stages. The widespread adoption of a single system and the introduction of a designated topography code for this disease could lead to greater uniformity in data reporting and an improved understanding of the incidence and disease outcome. Further analysis of survival data is needed to assess which classification system is the best suited for nasal vestibule carcinoma. Squamous cell carcinoma of the nasal vestibule is reported to account for less than one percent of all head and neck malignancies. It lacks a designated WHO ICD-O topography code, and multiple systems are available for the staging of this disease, which results in unwanted variability and the subsequent poor reliability of data. The aim of this study was to evaluate the currently available staging systems for cancer of the nasal vestibule, including the recently introduced classification by Bussu et al., which built on Wang's original concept but with clearer anatomical cutoffs. Different staging systems for cancer of the nasal vestibule (UICC nasal cavity, UICC skin cancer of the head and neck, Wang and Bussu et al.) were evaluated via a retrospective analysis of 148 patients. The staging system, per Bussu et al., had the most balanced allocation of patients among the stages. When using the Wang classification as a reference, stage migration occurred less frequently with the Bussu classification. The widespread adoption of a single staging system, as well as the introduction of a designated topography code for cancer of the nasal vestibule, could lead to more uniformity in data reporting and improve an understanding of the incidence and disease outcome. The newly proposed carcinoma of the nasal vestibule classification by Bussu et al. has the potential to improve the staging and allocation among stages. Further analysis of survival data is needed to assess which classification system is best suited for nasal vestibule carcinoma. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]