1. Ethical Publishing: How Do We Get There?
- Author
-
Racimo, Fernando, Galtier, Nicolas, De Herde, Véronique, Aubert Bonn, Noémie, Phillips, Ben, Guillemaud, Thomas, Bourguet, Denis, Globe Institute, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen = Københavns Universitet (UCPH)-University of Copenhagen = Københavns Universitet (UCPH), Institut des Sciences de l'Evolution de Montpellier (UMR ISEM), Centre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement (Cirad)-École pratique des hautes études (EPHE), Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-Institut de recherche pour le développement [IRD] : UR226-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université de Montpellier (UM), Rotterdam School of Management, RSM Erasmus University, Hasselt University (UHasselt), School of BioSciences [Melbourne], Faculty of Science [Melbourne], University of Melbourne-University of Melbourne, Institut Sophia Agrobiotech (ISA), Université Nice Sophia Antipolis (1965 - 2019) (UNS), COMUE Université Côte d'Azur (2015-2019) (COMUE UCA)-COMUE Université Côte d'Azur (2015-2019) (COMUE UCA)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement (INRAE)-Université Côte d'Azur (UCA), Centre de Biologie pour la Gestion des Populations (UMR CBGP), Centre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement (Cirad)-Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD [France-Sud])-Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement (INRAE)-Institut Agro Montpellier, Institut national d'enseignement supérieur pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement (Institut Agro)-Institut national d'enseignement supérieur pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement (Institut Agro)-Université de Montpellier (UM), University of Copenhagen = Københavns Universitet (UCPH), Centre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement (Cirad)-École Pratique des Hautes Études (EPHE), Université Catholique de Louvain = Catholic University of Louvain (UCL), University of Melbourne, no funding, Racimo, Fernando, Galtier, Nicolas, De Herde, Véronique, AUBERT BONN, Noemie, Phillips, Ben, Guillemaud, Thomas, Bourget, Denis, Sytra -Earth and Life Institute, UCLouvain, Research Group of Healthcare and Ethics, Faculty of Medicine and Life Sciences, Hasselt Universty, School of BioSciences, Faculty of Science, University of Melbourne, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA)-Université Nice Sophia Antipolis (1965 - 2019) (UNS), and COMUE Université Côte d'Azur (2015-2019) (COMUE UCA)-COMUE Université Côte d'Azur (2015-2019) (COMUE UCA)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)
- Subjects
open access ,collective action ,[SHS.STAT]Humanities and Social Sciences/Methods and statistics ,[SDV]Life Sciences [q-bio] ,[SHS.INFO]Humanities and Social Sciences/Library and information sciences ,academic publishing ,journals ,[SHS.ECO]Humanities and Social Sciences/Economics and Finance ,ethics ,[SHS]Humanities and Social Sciences ,[SHS.HISPHILSO]Humanities and Social Sciences/History, Philosophy and Sociology of Sciences ,[SCCO]Cognitive science ,peer-review ,[SDE]Environmental Sciences ,open science ,General Earth and Planetary Sciences ,journal ,recommendation model ,open-access ,General Environmental Science - Abstract
International audience; The academic journal publishing model is deeply unethical: today, a few major, for-profit conglomerates control more than 50% of all articles in the natural sciences and social sciences, driving subscription and open-access publishing fees above levels that can be sustainably maintained by publicly funded universities, libraries, and research institutions worldwide. About a third of the costs paid for publishing papers is profit for these dominant publishers' shareholders, and about half of them covers costs to keep the system running, including lobbying, marketing fees, and paywalls. The paywalls in turn restrict access of scientific outputs, preventing them from being freely shared with the public and other researchers. Thus, money that the public is told goes into science is actually being funneled away from it, or used to limit access to it. Alternatives to this model exist and have increased in popularity in recent years, including diamond open-access journals and community-driven recommendation models. These are free of charge for authors and minimize costs for institutions and agencies, while making peer-reviewed scientific results publicly accessible. However, for-profit publishing agents have made change difficult, by co-opting open-access schemes and creating journal-driven incentives that prevent an effective collective transition away from profiteering. Here, we give a brief overview of the current state of the academic publishing system, including its most important systemic problems. We then describe alternative systems. We explain the reasons why the move toward them can be perceived as costly to individual researchers, and we demystify common roadblocks to change. Finally, in view of the above, we provide a set of guidelines and recommendations that academics at all levels can implement, in order to enable a more rapid and effective transition toward ethical publishing.
- Published
- 2022