1. Reply to comment on 'Nonadjacent dependency processing in monkeys, apes, and humans'
- Author
-
Stuart K. Watson, Jutta L. Mueller, Susan P. Lambeth, Judith M. Burkart, Steven J. Schapiro, Simon W. Townsend, University of Zurich, and Townsend, Simon W
- Subjects
10207 Department of Anthropology ,Cognitive science ,1000 Multidisciplinary ,Evolutionary Biology ,Multidisciplinary ,Dependency (UML) ,300 Social sciences, sociology & anthropology ,Computer science ,Process (engineering) ,Data_MISCELLANEOUS ,05 social sciences ,Cognition ,Technical Comments ,Technical Comment ,Syntax ,050105 experimental psychology ,Psychological Science ,10127 Institute of Evolutionary Biology and Environmental Studies ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,10104 Department of Comparative Language Science ,SciAdv t-comment ,0501 psychology and cognitive sciences ,Relevance (information retrieval) ,030217 neurology & neurosurgery - Abstract
Processing predictive relationships in sequential auditory input is a core capacity allowing for the emergence of syntax., Rawski et al. revisit our recent findings suggesting the latent ability to process nonadjacent dependencies (“Non-ADs”) in monkeys and apes. Specifically, the authors question the relevance of our findings for the evolution of human syntax. We argue that (i) these conclusions hinge upon an assumption that language processing is necessarily hierarchical, which remains an open question, and (ii) our goal was to probe the foundational cognitive mechanisms facilitating the processing of syntactic Non-ADs—namely, the ability to recognize predictive relationships in the input.
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF