Search

Purpose: The Spinal Appearance Questionnaire (SAQ) is a widely validated tool for assessing perceptions of spinal deformity in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients. This study aimed to develop and validate a Greek version of the SAQ (GR-SAQ)., Methods: A cross-cultural adaptation of the SAQ following international guidelines was performed. Internal consistency and test-retest reliability were evaluated. Convergent validity was assessed by correlating the GR-SAQ with the Appearance domain of Scoliosis Research Society-22 (SRS-22) and the Cobb angle with the Trunk Shift domain of GR-SAQ. Divergent validity was examined through the relationship between GR-SAQ, patient characteristics, and clinical measures including Cobb angle, DIERS Formetric 4D angle, and scoliometer readings., Results: The study included 61 AIS patients (52 females, 13.91 ± 2.57 years, 25.33 ± 10.14° Cobb angle). GR-SAQ exhibited good internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.794) and excellent test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.931, 95%CI: 0.880-0.960). Correlations between GR-SAQ and SRS-22 showed a low-to-moderate negative correlation (r = -0.351, p = 0.006). The Trunk Shift domain moderately correlated with the Cobb Angle (r = 0.393, p = 0.002). Divergent validity analyses did not demonstrate statistical significance (p > 0.05)., Conclusion: The GR-SAQ is a valid and reliable tool for evaluating spinal deformity perception in Greek AIS patients., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Scoliosis Research Society.)

Purpose: The psychological effects of scoliosis bracing can be difficult, and thus clinicians sometimes recommend a brace holiday when the curve corrects to less than 25°. However, the clinical indications for taking a break from the brace before reaching maturity have yet to be described. We hypothesized there would be a relationship between brace holiday eligibility and degree of curve at presentation, change in curve magnitude while bracing, and level of bracing compliance., Methods: A retrospective cohort study at a single institution was performed from 2016 to 2022. Objective brace compliance I-button data were collected on patients aged 3-9 years old. Patients with other etiologies besides idiopathic scoliosis before the age of 10 were excluded. Binary logistic regression was performed to determine the effect of significant variables on the likelihood of brace holiday., Results: Fifty-six patients met inclusion criteria. Of these, 20 were able to get a brace holiday. Patients with higher brace compliance and larger in-brace curve correction were more likely to get a brace holiday (P = 0.015, 0.004). Patients with higher BMIs and larger curves at initial presentation were less likely to get a brace holiday (P = 0.002, 0.014)., Conclusion: Compliant brace wearers with good in-brace correction are most likely to be eligible for a brace holiday. While some elements remain immutable, others are modifiable, such as bracing compliance. Understanding how outcomes differ between patients who do and do not take a brace holiday will be crucial to elucidating if the psychological benefit of taking a break from the brace can be justified., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Purpose: The goal of this study is to characterize the self-reported prevalence of psychiatric comorbidities among patients with adolescent scoliosis., Methods: Eligible patients across the US were surveyed using ResearchMatch, a validated online platform. The survey collected patient demographics, type of scoliosis, scoliosis treatment received, and the mental health diagnoses and interventions., Results: Nearly all (98%) of the 162 respondents were patients themselves, the remainder of which were parents. The majority of whom were female (93%), Caucasian (85%), and diagnosed with idiopathic scoliosis (63%). The median age of diagnosis was 13 (IQR 11-18). Most respondents had mild to moderate scoliosis (65%), and 17% received surgical treatment. 76 of 158 (48%) responded that scoliosis affected their overall mental health, and 92 (58%) had received a mental health diagnosis-76% were diagnosed after their scoliosis diagnosis. Of the 92 with mental health diagnoses, the most common diagnoses were clinical depression (83%), anxiety (71%), negative body image (62%). Over 80% of patients received medical treatment or therapy. Of those with depression, 38.4% received counseling and 45.2% received medication. 52% of the respondents also had immediate family members with mental health diagnoses, with siblings (48%) having the highest proportion., Conclusion: According to the CDC, the prevalence of US teenagers with diagnosed depression was found to be 3.9% and anxiety disorder to be 4.7%, notably higher among adolescent girls. In this national sample, over half of adolescent scoliosis patients report psychiatric comorbidity, often diagnosed years later. The most prevalent psychiatric condition is depression, anxiety, and body-image disturbances. These findings highlight the importance of awareness of the psychiatric impact of adolescent scoliosis, and importance of screening and treatment of comorbid mental health conditions., Level of Evidence: IV., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: The Scoliosis Research Society SRS-22 questionnaire is a standard tool to assess the Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) in scoliosis patients but, because of cultural differences limited use among Arabic patients. The aim is to perform a cross-cultural adaptation and validation of Arabic version of Scoliosis Japanese Questionnaire-27 and test it on Saudi patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS)., Methods: This a cross sectional study run between July 2021 and December 2022 recruited 194 patients. The cross-cultural adaptation process was performed using the American Association of Orthopedic Surgeons (AAOS) Outcomes Committee method. All patients had completed the Arabic version of Scoliosis Japanese Questionnaire-27 and SF-12 preoperatively and 3-month postoperatively. The validity and internal consistency were tested using the Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), Cronbach alpha, Pearson correlation coefficient, and confidence interval (CI)., Results: We analyzed the result of 194 female adolescent patients. The average age is 14 ± 2.4 years (range from 10 to 21 years). The majority of patients have a Lenke type 1 curve (54 %). The overall Cronbach alpha (CA) of all domains of Scoliosis Japanese Questionnaire-27 is 0.92. However, the Cronbach alpha for the mental health (Q17,18,20,21,23,24) and, self-image (Q12-14,22,25,26) are 0.93 and 0.84 respectively., Conclusion: The Arabic version of Scoliosis Japanese Questionnaire-27 is a reliable and valid instrument and can be applied to evaluate the quality of life in patients with AIS., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported. No fund was received to conduct this study. Patients accepted and signed the consent form approved by institutional review board., (Copyright © 2023 The Japanese Orthopaedic Association. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Thoracolumbar adolescent idiopathic scoliosis can continue to progress beyond skeletal maturity. Ideal timing of surgery remains undefined. Earlier intervention, with shorter instrumentation, incurs early partial loss of lumbar motion. Waiting for progression incurs a greater risk of extensive arthrodesis. The aim of the present study was to assess the quality-of-life impact of age and scoliosis severity at surgery., Material and Methods: Patients with Lenke 5 or 6 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis, aged 16-45years, were analyzed based on a prospective clinical registry. Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and Scoliosis Research Society (SRS)-22 scores were collected preoperatively and at 6months, 1year and 2years. Coronal and sagittal alignments were measured on full-spine radiographs, and curve flexibility was assessed on bending radiographs. A mixed linear model was used to assess the impact of age, Cobb angle and flexibility on quality of life., Results: Thirty-six patients were included. Mean ODI was 20.5% preoperatively and 13.8% at 2years (p=0.017). Mean SRS-22 was 3.2 preoperatively and 3.9 at 2years (p<0.001). Mean Cobb angle was 56.6° preoperatively and 23.2° at 2years (p<0.001), with mean preoperative reducibility of 68.1%. Age and ODI correlated preoperatively (r=0.6; p<0.001) and at 6months (r=0.5; p=0.002), as did age and SRS-22 (r=-0.6; p<0.001 and r=-0.6; p<0.001, respectively). Linear regression found a significant negative correlation between thoracolumbar Cobb angle and change in SRS-22 at 6months., Discussion: In 16-45 year-olds with Lenke 5 or 6 idiopathic scoliosis, age influenced SRS-22 score. Younger patients had better quality of life both pre- and post-operatively. Curve magnitude influenced postoperative score. The present study suggests that early surgical correction in younger patients, where instrumentation can be shorter, does not impair quality of life., Level of Evidence: IV; prospective registry study., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Background and Objectives : Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS) affects individuals aged 10-18 years and is characterized by spinal deformity, three-dimensional axis deformation, and vertebral rotation. Schroth method exercises and braces have been shown to reduce the Cobb angle and halt spinal deformity progression. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of a 12-month, supervised Schroth exercise program on scoliosis severity and quality of life in adolescents with AIS. Materials and Methods : Eighty adolescents with AIS (aged 10-17 years) were prescribed a brace and were divided into two groups. The intervention group followed a supervised Schroth exercise program three times a week for 12 months in addition to wearing a brace. The control group used only the brace. Outcomes included the Cobb angle of the main curvature and the sum of curves using radiography, the maximum angle of trunk rotation (ATR maximum, using a scoliometer), and quality of life with the Scoliosis Research Society-22 (SRS-22) questionnaire. Evaluations were conducted at baseline, after 12 months, and 6 months post-intervention. A multivariate analysis of covariance (MANCOVA) was used for statistical analysis ( p -Value < 0.05). Results : The intervention group showed statistically significant improvement compared to the control group in the 12th month in Cobb angle (mean differences, 95% CI: -3.65 (-5.81, -1.53), p -Value < 0.001, Cohen's d = 0.30), ATR maximum (mean differences, 95% CI: -3.05 (-3.86, -2.23), p -Value < 0.001, Cohen's d = 0.74), and SRS-22 score (mean differences, 95% CI: 0.87 (0.60, 1.13), p -Value < 0.001, Cohen's d = 0.58). Differences in ATR maximum and SRS-22 score remained significant at the 18-month measurement. No significant differences were found between groups in the sum of curves ( p -Value > 0.05). Conclusions : A 12-month supervised Schroth exercise program in AIS patients undergoing brace treatment significantly improves scoliosis severity (Cobb angle and ATR maximum) and quality of life. Improvements were greater than those in shorter-duration studies, suggesting a linear dose-response relationship. Further clinical studies are needed to clarify the impact of long-term Schroth programs.

Background: Meeting the 24-hour movement behavior (24-HMB) guideline helps enhance quality of life (QOL) of adolescents. This study aimed to assess the associations between the 24-HMB (physical activity, screen time, sleep) and QOL among adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis., Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted between September 2021 and September 2023. 24-HMB, QOL and demographic variables were collected through a self-reported questionnaire. Linear regression models and stratified analyses were used to explore statistical associations between the 24-HMB and QOL., Results: A total of 1073 participants aged 10-18 years with a spinal Cobb angle between 10° and 40° were included. Overall, 20 participants (1.9%) met all three behavioral guidelines, and 272 participants (25.3%) met none. Compared to those who did not meet any of the guidelines, adolescents meeting both screen time and sleep duration (β = 4.10, 95% CI: 2.02-6.18, P < 0.001) and all 3 guidelines (β = 4.39, 95% CI: 0.27-8.51, P = 0.037) had higher QOL scores. Stratified analyses showed that the above associations were more pronounced in adolescents without back pain or with good self-image., Conclusions: These findings highlight the importance of adopting and maintaining healthy behavioral habits in order to improve QOL among adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis, especially in those without back pain or with good self-image., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Purpose: To perform a cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Brazilian-Portuguese versions of the Brace Questionnaire in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis., Methods: A forward-backward translation process was employed to produce a Brazilian Portuguese version of the Brace Questionnaire, followed by comprehensive cross-cultural adaptation stages. The measurements of internal consistency and test-retest reliability were assessed by Cronbach's a and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), respectively. The Pearson's correlation coefficient was used to analyze the concurrent validity by comparison with the Scoliosis Research Society-22r questionnaire., Results: A total of 84 scoliosis patients (age 13.4 ± 2.0 years, thoracic Cobb angle 33.3° ± 13.8°, and lumbar Cobb angle 29.8° ± 14.3°) were included. The Brace Questionnaire showed excellent internal consistency (Cronbach α = 0.93) and moderate reliability (ICC = 0.86). The correlations between the Brace Questionnaire and Scoliosis Research Society-22 were r = 0.66; p = 0.011. In addition, it was found that the Brazilian version of the Brace Questionnaire does not have ceiling and floor effects., Conclusions: The Brazilian-Portuguese adaptation of the brace questionnaire shows excellent reliability and can be a valid tool for psychometric assessment in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Purpose: To review the current literature surrounding the assessment of self-image in pediatric and adult spinal deformity., Methods: The literature were reviewed for studies examining patient-reported outcome measurements (PROM) and self-image in pediatric and adult spinal deformity. PROM performance metrics were collected and described. The relationships between self-image PROM and patient outcomes, including satisfaction, were described., Results: Several self-image PROM exist, including the Scoliosis Research Society-22r (SRS-22r) self-image domain, the Body Image Disturbance Questionnaire (BIDQ), and the Spinal Appearance Questionnaire (SAQ). The most commonly used is the self-image domain of the SRS-22r. It is validated in adult and pediatric spinal deformity and is correlated with patient desire for surgery and satisfaction after surgery. This domain is limited by floor and ceiling effects., Conclusion: Self-image assessment is critical to both pediatric and adult spinal deformity surgeries. The SRS-22r self-image domain is the most frequently reported PROM for this health domain. While valid in both surgical cohorts, this PROM is affected by floor and ceiling effects which limits the ability to discriminate between health states. Given the overall importance of this domain to patients with spinal deformity further efforts are needed to improve discrimination without gross increases in PROM question burden, which may limit broad acceptance and use., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Scoliosis Research Society.)

Study Design: Retrospective review of a prospectively collected multicenter registry., Objective: To evaluate health-related quality of life (HRQOL) measures in an operative cohort of patients (OP) and compare them with a matched nonoperative cohort (NON)., Summary of Background Data: Historically, the surgical outcomes of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) have been radiographically evaluated. However, the importance of HRQOL measures and their impact on surgical outcomes are increasingly being understood., Materials and Methods: We identified 90 NON patients with curves in the operative range who were observed for at least two years. These patients were matched with an OP cohort of 689 patients. All patients completed the Scoliosis Research Society-22 (SRS-22) questionnaire at the initial evaluation and at a minimum of two-year follow-up. Subgroup comparisons were based on curve type: primary thoracic (Th), primary thoracolumbar/lumbar (TL/L), and double major (DM) curves., Results: The preoperative major curves in the Th, TL/L, and DM OP subgroups averaged 50.4°, 45.4°, and 51.5°, respectively, and 49.4°, 43.7°, and 48.9° in the NON cohort ( P >0.05). At two years postoperatively, the major curve in the Th, TL/L, and DM OP subgroups improved to 19.0°, 19.2°, and 19.3°, respectively, compared with the progression to 51.3°, 44.5°, and 49.7° in the NON group at two-year follow-up ( P <0.05). The SRS-22 self-image, mental health, satisfaction, and total scores at the two-year follow-up were significantly better in all OP subgroups ( P <0.001) but remained largely unchanged in the NON group. A significant percentage of patients ( P <0.001) in the OP cohort reported better SRS-22 scores at the two-year follow-up in the self-image, mental health, and satisfaction domains than the NON group at two years., Conclusions: Surgically treated patients with AIS have improved HRQOL outcomes in several domains compared with age-matched and curve magnitude-matched nonoperatively treated patients at two-year follow-up., Competing Interests: The authors report no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Stigma is the negative attitudes towards an illness or difference. The literature lacks detailed scales specifically addressing stigmatization in AIS. This study aimed to develop Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Stigma Assessment Scale (AIS-SAS) to measure stigmatization in AIS patients., Methods: In creating the AIS-SAS, we developed items via literature review and expert input, confirmed content validity, and conducted a field test for construct validity and reliability. Our experts designed 38 items in three subscales: Scoliosis, Brace, and Surgery-related stigma. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and convergent validity were examined for construct validity. The convergent validity of AIS-SAS was assessed through its correlations with the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSES), SRS-22, and Spinal Appearance Questionnaire (SAQ). Reliability was gauged via internal consistency and test-retest methods., Results: Sixty-seven adolescents with AIS were included in the study. EFA results confirmed one-dimensionality for each subscale, with factor loadings from 0.51 to 0.96, leading to the removal of 8 items with loadings below 0.3 from the AIS-SAS. The final AIS-SAS has three subscales: scoliosis (18 items), brace (5 items), and surgery-related stigma (7 items). Regarding convergent validity, the scoliosis-related stigma scores significantly correlated with SRS-22 self-image (r= -0.413 p = 0.001) and SAQ-Appearance (r = 0.441 p = 0.002). The RSES-Total score shows a negative correlation with Scoliosis, Brace, and Surgery-related stigma scores: -0.500 (p < 0.001), -0.435 (p = 0.049), and  -0.498 (p = 0.042), respectively. AIS-SAS subscales showed good reliability (Cronbach-α > 0.8 ICC > 0.8)., Conclusion: AIS-SAS is the first valid and reliable high-quality scale assessing stigmatization from AIS, measuring scoliosis, brace, and surgery-related stigma via three subscales., Competing Interests: Ethical approval: The study was approved by Institutional Ethics Committee. (IRB No. 2021-01/990). Competing interests: The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest. Informed consent: was obtained from the participants and their families., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Background: The prognosis of surgically treated subjects with early onset scoliosis (EOS) into adulthood has been lacking. We aimed to investigate the patients' perspectives on satisfaction with surgical treatment., Methodology: We included all surgical candidates with EOS who had undergone index spinal surgery for scoliosis correction between 2009 and 2013. The minimum duration of postoperative follow-up was 10 years at the time of survey completion. Three questionnaires were used in this study, comprising the revised Scoliosis Research Society questionnaire (SRS-22r), the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29), and the World Health Organization Quality of Life (WHOQOL-BREF). Measures of treatment satisfaction were retrieved from SRS-22r., Results: There were 29 participants who completed the survey, and thereby included in the study (i.e., a response rate of 43% and a dropout rate of 6%). Amongst them, 14, 11, and 4 individuals received posterior spinal fusion (PSF), magnetically controlled growing rods (MCGR), and traditional growing rods, respectively. The average duration after the index spinal surgery was 12.6 ± 2.2 years. Our findings revealed that self-image (across all treatment groups), sleep disruption (only in PSF), and social aspects (in both PSF and MCGR) were significantly worse when compared to the normative values. According to the multivariable linear regression model (R-square = 0.690, p < .001), an increase in SRS-22r mental health (p = .008) and PROMIS-29 social participation scores (p = .004) corresponded to 0.511 and 0.055 points increases in satisfaction. Every unit increase in PROMIS-29 fatigue (p = .043) and WHOQOL-BREF physical domain scores (p = .007) was in conjunction with 0.019 and 0.040 points decreases in satisfaction. SRS-22r self-image (p = .056) and WHOQOL-BREF environmental domain scores (p = .076) were included in the model but did not reach statistical significance., Conclusions: To improve the long term quality of life in surgical candidates with EOS, we demonstrated that mental health, social participation, fatigue, and physical health were significant factors associated with treatment satisfaction. Interestingly, demographic and radiographic parameters did not have a significant effect in our cohort., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis affects 2-4% of adolescents aged 10-16, while Scheuermann's kyphosis affects 0.4-10% of adolescents aged 11 to 16. Over the past 50 years, brace treatment has been recommended as the most common non-surgical intervention for treating these spinal deformities. The effectiveness of brace treatment depends on the duration of brace wearing. This study aimed to understand the brace compliance process for adolescents with spinal deformities through a qualitative approach., Method: This study applied multicenter exploratory qualitative research with an interpretative framework and enlisted the participation of as many individuals as possible involved in brace-wearing in adolescents with spinal deformities. Semi-structured, in-depth, and face-to-face interviews and telephone conversations from September 2020 to May 2021 were conducted. The recorded audio of each interview was typed into Word software with each personal code. The content analysis method was used to analyze the data., Results: Seventy-four participants were interviewed, including 32 adolescents treated with braces and their parents (27 mothers, five fathers), six orthotists, two physiotherapists, and two spine surgeons. Following data analysis, four main categories, 14 categories, and 69 subcategories of 2403 related codes were discovered., Conclusion: Based on the analysis of the current qualitative research, adolescents with spinal deformities experience extensive challenges in the treatment process, which can affect the results and brace intervention efficacy. The current research findings showed that every adolescent goes through similar but unique conditions during the treatment. The importance of considering each adolescent's specific conditions and characteristics and providing functional solutions and support was understood to help them navigate critical situations more quickly and achieve effective treatment outcomes., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist., (Copyright: © 2024 Ghorbani et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.)

Spinal fusion surgery is one of the most common major surgical procedures in youth. Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) is the most frequent reason for corrective spinal fusion. AIS (∼25%-47% of cases) and spinal fusion surgeries are associated with pain, including the development of new onset chronic pain for up to 15% of youth. This research used photovoice approaches to explore the journeys of youth from before, during, and after spinal fusion surgery, to demonstrate their experiences both of and beyond pain. Twenty participants were recruited from a previous study conducted by the senior author's lab. Participants captured photos/videos in their daily life (Phase 1); collected previously taken photos/videos from before/during/after their surgery (Phase 2); and participated in individual interviews to reflexively discuss the meaning behind photos/videos (Phase 3). Before interviews, a questionnaire was administered to assess pain characteristics. Nineteen girls/women with scoliosis and one boy/man with kyphosis (12-19 years old, M age = 16 years) participated; they identified as white (80%), other (15%), and Southeast Asian (5%). The researchers used a reflexive thematic analysis approach, which generated five themes: (1) body aesthetic versus machine; (2) expectations and anticipation of surgery/outcomes; (3) desire of normalcy and freedom; (4) navigating a hoped-for positive surgery experience; and (5) the journey sculpts identity formation and sense of self. Findings support youth advocacy, underscoring the need to validate youth concerns and inform healthcare professionals of the importance of individualized care. Youth perspectives highlighted opportunities for optimizing surgery/healthcare experiences and the psychosocial impacts of scoliosis on body image and appearance., Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Objective: Although the advantages of postoperative braces have been verified in many fields, it is not clear whether postoperative braces can help reduce patients' adverse psychological emotions such as kinesiophobia, anxiety, and depression. This study aims to analyze whether the use of a postoperative brace helps reduce adverse psychological emotions in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients undergoing spinal deformity surgeries., Methods: All consecutive patients who underwent spinal corrective surgeries at our institution between April 2023 and July 2023 formed the prospective cohort. Outcome measures were collected in the preoperative period, 3 months after surgery, and 6 months after surgery. All patients were assessed using the Tampa scale for kinesiophobia (TSK), the hospital anxiety and depression scale (HADS), and the numerical rating scale (NRS). A statistical model of propensity score matching was used to eliminate potential selection bias and maintain comparability. Multivariate linear regression models were used to determine the relationship between postoperative brace and adverse psychological emotions., Results: After propensity score matching, this study ultimately enrolled 150 patients. There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of demographic and perioperative variables. The fully adjusted model showed that the TSK scores of the non-brace group at the 3-month (ꞵ = 2.50, 95% CI 0.80-4.20, p = 0.005) and 6-month follow-up (ꞵ = 2.75, 95% CI 0.75-4.74, p = 0.007) were significantly higher than those of the brace group. The HADS score of the non-brace group at the 3-month follow-up was significantly higher than that of the brace group (ꞵ = 1.75, 95% CI 0.28-3.22, p = 0.019). The NRS score of the non-brace group at the 3-month follow-up was significantly higher than that of the brace group (ꞵ = 0.69, 95% CI 0.05-1.33, p = 0.034). At the 6-month follow-up, there were no significant difference for HADS score or NRS score between the two groups., Conclusion: In the early postoperative period, the postoperative brace could provide AIS patients with psychological supports and help them reduce the frequency of adverse psychological emotions. The postoperative brace could continuously improve the fear of movement within 6 months after surgery, and help reduce anxiety, depression, and pain within 3 months after surgery., (© 2024 The Author(s). Orthopaedic Surgery published by Tianjin Hospital and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.)

Objective: Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) is the most prevalent spinal deformity affecting healthy children. Although AIS typically lacks symptomatic manifestations, its resultant deformities can affect patients' quality of life (QoL). Evaluating QoL and stress levels is crucial in determining the optimal brace type for AIS patients; however, research comparing the effectiveness of different brace types in this regard is lacking. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the impact of Boston versus Chêneau braces on QoL and stress levels in AIS patients., Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted at a medical institution in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, involving 52 eligible patients selected through stratified random sampling based on type of brace as the main stratum. The inclusion criteria were idiopathic scoliosis, age ≥ 10 years, bracing for at least 3 months, and no history of cancer. QoL was evaluated according to the revised Scoliosis Research Society 22-item questionnaire (SRS-22r) and stress levels according to the eight-item Bad Sobernheim stress questionnaire (BSSQ-Brace). Independent-sample t-tests were used to compare brace-related QoL and stress level according to participants' sex and brace type., Results: Overall, 32 participants were treated with Boston braces (seven men and 25 women), with a median (IQR) age of 11.00 years (10.00-13.00), and 20 participants were treated with Chêneau braces (three men, 17 women), with a median (IQR) age of 12.50 years (10.00-14.25). The total SRS-22 score was not significantly different between the brace groups (p = 0.158). However, patients in the Boston brace group reported significantly higher satisfaction levels (median = 4.00, IQR = 3.50-4.50) than did those in the Chêneau brace group (median = 3.25, IQR = 2.38-4.13, p = 0.013, moderate effect size = 0.345, 95% CI = 0.060 to 0.590). Furthermore, the BSSQ-brace total score was significantly higher in the Boston brace group (median = 9.00, IQR = 8.00-12.00) than in the Chêneau brace group (median = 7.50, IQR = 4.75-10.00, p = 0.007, moderate effect size = 0.376, 95% CI = 0.130 to 0.590), indicating higher stress levels in the Chêneau brace group., Conclusion: The QoL in AIS patients undergoing brace treatment was comparable across groups. Nonetheless, patients who used Chêneau braces experienced higher stress levels and lower treatment satisfaction rates than did those who used Boston braces. These findings can inform clinical decisions regarding prescription of bracing types and highlight the need for further in-depth research., (© 2024 The Author(s). Orthopaedic Surgery published by Tianjin Hospital and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.)

The Quality of Life Profile for spinal deformities (QLPSD) was developed to evaluate the quality of life of patients with scoliosis and other spinal deformities. The purpose of the study was to systematically translate the QLPSD into Turkish and examine the reliability and validity of the Turkish version. This methodological study was conducted with 125 participants with idiopathic scoliosis. After the translation of the QLPSD into Turkish systematically, all participants answered the Turkish version of the QLPSD (T-QLPSD) and Scoliosis Research Society-22 items (SRS-22) questionnaires. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Cronbach's α statistics were used to test the reliability of the tools: convergent and construct validity of the tools was assessed using exploratory factor analysis and Pearson's correlation analysis. One hundred twenty-five participants were included in the study. The mean age of them was 13.7 ± 2.2 years. For the T-QLPSD total score, Cronbach's α was 0.91, and the ICC was 0.94. A very good correlation was found between T-QLPSD and SRS-22 total scores (r = -0.71). Participants with mild scoliosis reported less back pain (P = .038), better back flexibility (P=.001), and body image (P=.044) compared to moderate scoliosis. The T-QLPSD was found to be a reliable and valid scale for assessing quality of life in idiopathic scoliotic patients in Türkiye.

Objective: The 24-item Early-Onset Scoliosis Questionnaire (EOSQ-24) is validated in patients with early onset scoliosis (EOS) aged 0 to 18 years and the 22-item Scoliosis Research Society (SRS-22) questionnaire is validated in idiopathic scoliosis patients 10 years and older. EOSQ-24 is completed by the caregiver and SRS-22 is completed by the patient. A prior study comparing patient-reported outcome measures completed by older pediatric patients and their parents showed a low level of agreement. Our purpose was to compare EOSQ-24 and SRS-22 scores completed at the same time point and at subsequent time points, in patients aged 5 to 18 years with idiopathic or congenital EOS without developmental delay., Methods: This was a multicenter retrospective study. We identified pairs of EOSQ-24 and SRS-22 completed on the same day or within 6 months. Some patients had multiple pairs of surveys over time. EOSQ-24 and SRS-22 questions were matched and domain scores for Pain, Function, Mental Health, and Satisfaction were compared. Patients with a change in treatment between surveys were excluded. Pearson correlation coefficients ( r ) were used to compare domain scores, with r ≥0.7 indicating a strong relationship., Results: There were 228 patient-caregiver dyads who completed 411 pairs of EOSQ-24 and SRS-22 on the same day. A strong correlation was found only for the Pain domain ( r =0.77). Function, Mental Health, and Satisfaction domains had positive but not strong correlations ( r = 0.58, r = 0.50, r = 0.41, respectively). Subanalysis based on age also showed a strong correlation only for Pain. There were 76 patient-caregiver dyads who completed 134 pairs of surveys with SRS-22 completed within 6 months after an EOSQ-24. All domains demonstrated a positive but not strong correlation, with Pain showing the highest correlation ( r = 0.64)., Conclusions: EOSQ-24 and SRS-22 had a strong correlation only for Pain when completed at the same time point. EOSQ-24 and SRS-22 completed within 6 months lacked a strong correlation for all domains. Our findings suggest that parents and children with EOS may not share the same perspective on their health. Self-reported questionnaires should be used when possible to assess health-related quality of life in older children and adolescents with EOS who are developmentally neurotypical., Level of Evidence: Level III-diagnostic., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: EOSQ-24 is a parent proxy questionnaire designed to assess the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of early-onset scoliosis (EOS) patients during their childhood years. EOSQ-SELF, a novel self-reported questionnaire, assesses HRQoL in older children (>8 y) and adolescents. So far, the same group of EOS patients has not been evaluated with both EOSQ-24 and EOSQ-SELF. The aim of this study was to evaluate how the same pathology was reflected in the parent and patient at different time points by comparing the answers to the common questions between EOSQ-24 and EOSQ-SELF., Methods: A group of otherwise healthy EOS patients whose parents filled out EOSQ-24 at the early phase of growth-friendly treatment was re-tested by the EOSQ-SELF questionnaire at the end of treatment. Both EOSQ-24 and EOSQ-SELF are validated in Turkish. Inclusion criteria were patients with EOS, independent ambulation, age of 8 years or older at EOSQ-SELF enrollment, literacy in Turkish, no apparent intellectual impairment, and a minimum of 24 months after graduation. The common questions between the 2 surveys with nearly identical phrasings were extracted. Common items from the 2 tests were compared with a Wilcoxon signed rank test., Results: Twenty-one patients (15 females, 6 males) who previously filled out EOSQ-24 met the inclusion criteria. The mean age of the group was 10 (5 to 16) years at EOSQ-24 participation and 18 (13 to 24) at the final analysis. Fourteen questions were found common in 10 domains. The scores were significantly different in 5 questions of 4 domains. EOSQ-SELF had significantly less favorable scores in the pain/discomfort, pulmonary function, and fatigue/energy level domains. Scores in the parental burden/relationships domain were significantly higher (P<0.05)., Conclusions: The self-reported group had a general trend of worse results. Parents and caregivers may not accurately perceive the problems of EOS patients. Our findings indicate a disconnect between caregivers and the patients, as both parties underreported the other side in some domains. These findings suggest the challenges faced by EOS patients are not adequately reflected on proxy questionnaires that assess the HRQoL of children., Level of Evidence: Diagnostic Level I., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: EOSQ-24 is a disease specific patient-reported outcome score used to assess the quality of life in patients with early-onset scoliosis. The aim of this study was to translate and cross-culturally adapt the English version of the EOSQ-24 to Finnish language and to assess the reliability and validity of the translation., Methods: Cross-cultural adaptation and cross-cultural validation were performed to the Finnish translation of the EOSQ-24. Patients and/or their caretakers were then recruited to assess the psychometric properties of the translation. We assessed the internal consistency, test-retest reliability, floor and ceiling effects, and discriminative abilities. One-hundred-and-three patients filled the questionnaire., Results: EOSQ-24 was successfully translated into Finnish. The translation showed excellent internal consistency (Cronbach alpha 0.94), satisfactory item-total correlations ranging from 0.6 to 0.9, and moderate to strong inter item correlations. Test-retest reliability ranged from 0.7 to 0.96 indicating good to excellent agreement. Patients with neuromuscular and syndromic scoliosis reported lower EOSQ-24 scores when compared to patients' idiopathic and congenital scoliosis. There was a significant negative correlation between major curve and EOSQ-24 scores in patients with idiopathic early onset scoliosis., Conclusion: The internal consistency and test-retest reliability of the measure were found to be satisfactory. A marked ceiling effect was observed, indicating a potential source of error., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Purpose: Our objective was to collect the experience and current attitude of those patients, now adults, operated on for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) more than 25 years ago with CD instrumentation (CDI)., Methods: Prospective qualitative cross-sectional study with interpretive phenomenological analysis approach of AIS patients operated in a single center with CDI between 1985 and 1995. Patients underwent a semi-structured interview with their original surgeon. Seven agreed themes were open for conversation, and several subthemes emerged related to their experience during their journey in life. Filed notes were recorded and transcribed verbatim. We used the method of content, semantic and pragmatic analysis., Results: We contacted 103 patients, 100 agreed to participate. Mean age was 47.5 ± 3.3, mean follow-up was 30.9 ± 2.7 years. Three fundamental concerns stood out: discomfort with self-image; low back pain with daily activities; and lack of spinal flexibility. 50% were engaged in continuous physical exercise, and only some referred limitations with load-bearing work. Patients commonly described negative memories of the conservative treatment, but positive memories of the surgical process. In general, there was a good adaptation to social life (occupation, social and family relationships). Two-thirds were married, and 65 women had offspring. A frequent concern was the excess of radiographs over the years, and three developed breast cancer., Conclusions: Factors such as dissatisfaction with self-image, low back pain, and spine stiffness were relevant to patients throughout their journeys. Despite this, the great majority were satisfied with the treatment received, which allowed them to lead an integrated life in society., Level of Evidence: Level II., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Scoliosis Research Society.)

Background Context: Congenital and juvenile scoliosis are both early-onset deformities that develop before the age of 10. Children are treated to prevent curve progression and problems in adulthood such as back pain and a decreased quality of life but literature on long-term outcomes remains scarce., Purpose: To evaluate the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and potential disability of children with congenital scoliosis (CS) or juvenile idiopathic scoliosis (JIS) after a minimum of 20 years follow-up., Study Design: Comparative cohort study., Patient Sample: A consecutive cohort of CS and JIS patients were retrospectively identified from a single-center scoliosis database. Patients born between 1968 and 1981 and treated during skeletal growth were eligible for participation., Outcome Measures: HRQoL (SF-36, SRS-22r, ODI)., Methods: The primary aim was to evaluate the HRQoL of CS and JIS patients using the general SF-36 questionnaire. Both patient cohorts were compared with age-matched national norms. The secondary aim was to analyze the differences between conservatively and surgically treated patients using the scoliosis-specific Scoliosis Research Society-22r questionnaire (SRS-22r) and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). T-tests were used for statistical comparison., Results: In total, 114 patients (67% of the eligible patients) completed the questionnaire, with a mean follow-up of 25.5±5.5 years after their final clinical follow-up. Twenty-nine patients with CS were included with a mean age of 44.4±3.8 years (79.3% female), and 85 patients with JIS with a mean age of 43.7±4.2 years (89.4% female). Of the SF-36 domains, only the vitality score (60.6±18.0 for CS and 58.1±17.6 for JIS cohort) and mental health score (70.0±18.4 for CS and 72.1±18.1 for JIS cohort) were significantly lower compared with the general population (68.6±19.3 for vitality, and 76.8±17.4 for mental health). These decreased scores were larger than the determined minimum clinically important difference threshold of 4.37. Surgically treated JIS patients had a significantly lower score on the SRS-22r pain domain than their nonsurgically treated peers (3.6±0.9 vs 4.1±0.7l p=.019). Surgically treated CS patients had a significantly higher score on the SRS-22r mental health domain than their nonsurgically treated peers (4.3±0.5 vs 3.5±1.0; p=.023). No significant differences were found in the other domains., Conclusions: Except for vitality and mental health domains, congenital and juvenile idiopathic scoliosis patients treated during skeletal growth had similar HRQoL on most SF-36 domains in adulthood compared with national norms. Surgical treated JIS patients experienced more pain compared with brace treated patients, while braced CS patients had a significantly lower mental scores compared with surgical treated patients. These long-term outcomes are essential to inform patients and can guide shared decision-making between clinicians and patients., (Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Scoliosis is an abnormal lateral curvature of the spine with the large majority of cases classed as idiopathic, meaning there is no known cause. Typically, most cases occur in children and young people affecting approximately three per cent of the adult populace with five out of six cases being female. The BackBone: Interdisciplinary Creative Practices and Body Positive Resilience pilot research study used arts and humanities methods to measure the impact of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) on well-being and body perception. The research aimed to contribute to a better understanding of alternative treatments towards improving quality of life in young women diagnosed with AIS. In particular, concentrating on two highlighted priorities from the Scoliosis Priority Setting Partnership: (1) How is quality of life affected by scoliosis and its treatment? How can we measure this in ways that are meaningful to patients? (2) How are the psychological impacts (including on body image) of diagnosis and treatment best managed.Using established medical techniques, art-based workshops, and focus groups with postoperative participants with AIS and their families we gathered both quantitative and qualitative data. The workshops explored the aesthetics of imperfection through material investigations that focus on the body as both an object and how it is experienced using the metaphor of tree images. Drawing parallels between the growth patterns of trees that, for complex and often unknown reasons, have grown unexpectedly we explored questions around ideological notions of perfect growth through art-making in a non-clinical setting. Uniquely, the pilot project sought to draw on insights from four key disciplines (art, medicine, psychology and human geography), thinking across boundaries to evoke different ways of knowing and understanding the complexities of body perception through image-making., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Objective: Depression has been implicated with worse immediate postoperative outcomes in adult spinal deformity (ASD) correction, yet the specific impact of depression on those patients undergoing minimally invasive surgery (MIS) requires further clarity. This study aimed to evaluate the role of depression in the recovery of patients with ASD after undergoing MIS., Methods: Patients who underwent MIS for ASD with a minimum postoperative follow-up of 1 year were included from a prospectively collected, multicenter registry. Two cohorts of patients were identified that consisted of either those affirming or denying depression on preoperative assessment. The patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) compared included scores on the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), numeric rating scale (NRS) for back and leg pain, Scoliosis Research Society Outcomes Questionnaire (SRS-22), SF-36 physical component summary, SF-36 mental component summary (MCS), EQ-5D, and EQ-5D visual analog scale., Results: Twenty-seven of 147 (18.4%) patients screened positive for preoperative depression. The nondepressed cohort had an average of 4.83 levels fused, and the depressed cohort had 5.56 levels fused per patient (p = 0.267). At 1-year follow-up, 10 patients still reported depression, representing a 63% decrease. Postoperatively, both cohorts demonstrated improvement in their PROMs; however, at 1-year follow-up, those without depression had statistically better outcomes based on the EQ-5D, MCS, and SRS-22 scores (p < 0.05). Patients with depression continued to experience higher NRS leg scores at 1-year follow-up (3.63 vs 2.22, p = 0.018). After controlling for covariates, the authors found that depression significantly impacted only 1-year follow-up MCS scores (β = 8.490, p < 0.05)., Conclusions: Depressed and nondepressed patients reported similar improvements after MIS surgery, except MCS scores were more likely to improve in nondepressed patients.

Aim: To evaluate the quality of life of patients with postural kyphosis (PK) compared with those adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) and Scheuermann Kyphosis (SK)., Material and Methods: Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of adolescents with PK who were admitted to our clinic between January 2020 and June 2022 was compared with that of patients with AIS and SK who were admitted during the same period by using the Scoliosis Research Society-22 (SRS-22) questionnaire. All patients were asked to complete the SRS-22 questionnaire before the radiological evaluation. In the radiological evaluation, the sagittal and coronal deformities of the patients were measured., Results: In total, 126 patients with PK were compared with age and sex-matched AIS patients and 42 SK patients. The mean SRS-22 function score of the PK group was 4.72 ± 0.3 while it was 4.38 ± 0.6 (p=0.015) in SK patients and it was 4.34 ± 0.6 (p < 0.001) in AIS patients. The mean SRS-22 pain scores of PK patients was 4.18 ± 0.7. The mean pain score was 3.68 ± 0.8 (p=0.033) in the SK group and 3.6 ± 0.8 (p=0.010) in the AIS group. Adolescents with PK perceived less pain than those with AIS or SK. The scores for the other domains of SRS-22 revealed no differences., Conclusion: HRQoL of patients with PK is reduced, similar to that of patients with common structural spine deformities. Recognizing the effects of PK on the HRQoL in adolescents can help physicians to treat these patients.

Purpose: The aim of our study was to determine the relationship between Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ) scores-a simple, validated depression screening tool-and Scoliosis Research Society (SRS)-22 questionnaire scores in patients with idiopathic scoliosis (IS)., Methods: IS patients screened for depression with the PHQ-2 who completed the SRS-22 over a 2-year period were reviewed. If PHQ-2 scores were positive (> 3), the more comprehensive PHQ-9 was administered. Median SRS-22 scores between positive and negative PHQ screens were compared. Nonparametric correlation between PHQ and SRS-22 Mental Health (MH) domain was performed. The ability of the MH domain to discriminate between patients with positive versus negative screens and patients with moderate-severe depression risk versus no-mild risk was evaluated with ROC analysis., Results: 521 patients were included. Patients with + PHQ-2 screens had significantly lower total and individual domain SRS scores, especially within the MH domain (4.0 vs. 3.2). For those with moderate-severe depression risk, total and individual domain scores were also significantly lower (MH domain, 4.0 vs. 3.0, p < 0.05). A weak, but significant correlation was observed between the PHQ and MH domain scores (rho = 0.32, p < 0.001). A cut-off of ≥ 3.6 on the MH domain demonstrated sensitivity of 0.75 and specificity of 0.86 for identifying patients at no-mild risk for depression., Conclusion: Recognizing mental health conditions is critical to successful IS treatment as psychosocial conditions can negatively affect treatment outcomes. IS patients scoring < 3.6 on the SRS-22 MH domain should be considered for depression screening due to an increased risk of moderate-severe depression., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Scoliosis Research Society.)

Study Design: Retrospective cohort study., Objective: To evaluate psychosocial effect of brace treatment in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) using EuroQoL 5-dimension (EQ-5D) depression and anxiety category., Background: AIS is a structural abnormality of the spine often affecting patients during the puberty, a critical period of developing psychosocial problems. Many questionnaires had been adapted to evaluate mental health and health-related quality of life of AIS patients. However, these questionnaires are often time consuming and difficult to obtain. Therefore, a simpler substitute-EQ-5D-was evaluated., Methods: This is a single-center retrospective cohort analysis of adult idiopathic scoliosis patients aged between 8 and 19, visiting outpatient's clinic. Beck's depression inventory, EQ-5D and EuroQoL visual assessment scale, and Objectified Body Consciousness Scale for Youth were compared between brace group and non-brace group of AIS patients. Furthermore, difference between male and female were evaluated within brace group., Results: None of the questionnaire showed significant difference between brace and non-brace group. However, when male and female patients were compared within brace group, female patients were significantly more susceptible to depression and anxiety based on EQ-5D and body consciousness. Furthermore, depression and anxiety according to both BDI and EQ-5D were significantly correlated to health-related quality of life., Conclusion: During brace treatment of female AIS patients, psychosocial status played a significant role in health-related quality of life. EQ-5D is a simple way to monitor the mental health status., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2023 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Study Design: Retrospective cohort., Objective: To examine SRS-Self Image scores at up to 10 years after surgery for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS)., Summary of Background Data: Self-image is complex with implications for surgical and patient-reported outcomes after AIS surgery. Surgically modifiable factors that impact self-image are inconsistently reported in the literature with few longer-term reports. We examined the rate and durability of self-image improvement., Materials and Methods: An AIS registry was queried for patients with up to 10 years of follow-up after AIS surgery. A mixed effects model estimated change in SRS-22 Self Image from baseline to 6 weeks, 1 year, 2 years, 5 years, and 10 years. All enrolled patients contributed data to the mixed effects models. A sub-analysis of patients with 1-year and 10-year follow-up evaluated worsening/static/improved SRS-22 Self Image scores examined stability of scores over that timeline. Baseline demographic data and 1-year deformity magnitude data were compared between groups using parametric and nonparametric tests as appropriate., Results: Data from 4608 patients contributed data to the longitudinal model; 162 had 1-year and 10-year data. Mean SRS-Self Image improvement at 10-year follow-up was 1.0 (95% CI: 0.9-1.1) point. No significant changes in Self-Image domain scores were estimated from 1-year to 10-year (all P >0.05) postoperative. Forty (25%) patients had SRS-Self Image worsening from 1 year to 10 years, 36 (22%) improved, and 86 (53%) were unchanged. Patients who worsened over 10 years had lower SRS-Self Image at baseline than those unchanged at enrollment (3.3 vs. 3.7, P =0.007). Neither radiographic parameters nor SRS-Mental Health were different at baseline for the enrolled patients., Conclusion: Ten years after surgery, 75% of patients reported similar or better SRS-Self Image scores than one year after surgery. Nearly 25% of patients reported worsening self-image at 10 years. Patients who worsened had lower baseline SRS-Self Image scores, without radiographic or mental health differences at baseline or follow-up., Competing Interests: The authors report no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2023 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

The purpose of this study was to assess if behavior and emotional function, as measured by the Pearson Behavioral Assessment Survey for Children, Second Edition (BASC-2) in patients and parents, changes with differing treatment protocols in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). One previous study showed abnormal BASC-2 scores in a substantial number of patients diagnosed with AIS; however, no study has assessed how these scores change over the course of treatment. AIS patients aged 12 to 21 years completed the BASC-2. The 176-item questionnaire was administered to subjects at enrollment, assessing behavioral and emotional problems across 16 subscales of 5 domains: school problems, internalizing problems, inattention/hyperactivity, emotional symptoms index, and personal adjustment. Parents were given an equivalent assessment survey. Surveys were administered again after 2 years. Subject treatment groups (bracing, surgery, and observation) were established at enrollment. Patients were excluded if they did not complete the BASC-2 at both time points. Forty-six patients met the inclusion criteria, with 13 patients in the surgical, 20 in the bracing, and 13 in the observation treatment groups. At enrollment, 26% (12/46) of subjects with AIS had a clinically significant score in 1 or more subscales, and after 2 years 24% (11/46) of subjects reported a clinically significant score in at least 1 subscale (P = .8). There were no significant differences in scores between enrollment and follow-up in any treatment group. Similar to what was reported in a previous study, only 36% (4/11) of patients had clinically significant scores reported by both patient and parent, conversely 64% (7/11) of parents were unaware of their child's clinically significant behavioral and emotional problems. Common patient-reported subscales for clinically significant and at-risk scores at enrollment included anxiety (24%; 11/46), hyperactivity (24%; 11/46), attention problems (17%; 8/46), and self-esteem (17%; 8/46). At 2-year follow-up, the most commonly reported subscales were anxiety (28%; 13/46), somatization (20%; 9/46), and self-esteem (30%; 14/46). Patients with AIS, whether observed, braced or treated surgically, showed no significant change in behavior and emotional distress over the course of their treatment, or compared with each other at 2-year follow-up., Competing Interests: The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose., (Copyright © 2023 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)

Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) is a progressive condition responsible for spinal deformity in all three planes. Spinal deformity and how the rib hump affects the aesthetics, and the functionality of the trunk can be a cause of psychological distress as well. Bracing as a treatment can have a negative impact on QoL, cause pain, affect participation levels in physical activities, and cause isolation and depression. Brace-induced stress may affect the patient's compliance with the treatment which may lead to scoliosis progression. The purpose of this study was to adapt and validate in the Greek language two instruments that can evaluate stress levels induced by bracing treatment and by deformity. The process of cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Bad Sobernheim Stress Questionnaire-Brace (ΒSSQ-Brace) and the Bad Sobernheim Stress Questionnaire-Deformity (BSSQ-Deformity) followed the International Quality of Life Assessment Project (IQOLA) guidelines. Forty-seven AIS patients with a mean age of 14.4 ± 1.51 years, mean Cobb angle of 30.08 ± 9.25, and mean duration of the bracing treatment at 20.5 ± 12.2 months participated. The mean score for GR-BSSQ Brace was 14.04 ± 6.42, which is interpreted as medium stress, whereas the mean score for GR-BSSQ Deformity was 20.34 ± 3.78, which is interpreted as low stress. GR-BSSQ Brace demonstrated good internal consistency with Cronbach's α = 0.87. GR-BSSQ Deformity demonstrated acceptable internal consistency with Cronbach's α = 0.73. Both GR-BSSQ Brace and GR-BSSQ Deformity exhibited excellent test-retest reliability with ICC values of 0.94 (95% CI 0.89-0.97) and 0.92 (95% CI 0.86-0.95), respectively. BSSQ Brace and BSSQ Deformity questionnaires have been cross-culturally adapted into the Greek language and have been proven to be valid and reliable instruments measuring brace and deformity-induced stress. Both questionnaires can be used for clinical and research purposes in Greek-speaking population., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.)

Background: Brace treatment is the most effective tool for avoiding curve progression in moderate adolescent idiopathic scoliosis and high adherence is required to achieve therapeutic success. Despite this, the compliance often is impaired by the concern about the psychological well-being of adolescents., Objective: This 36-month follow-up study investigated if the patients most adherent to brace treatment could report a stronger impairment in the quality of life and body image., Methods: 64 adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis responded to the Scoliosis Research Society-22 revised Patient Questionnaire at 12, 24, and 36 months after prescription of a TLSO rigid brace. Retrospectively, participants who wore a brace for more than 75% of the prescribed time were assigned to the good-compliance group (GC); the others formed the poor-compliance group (PC)., Results: At 12 months the GC group showed higher scores in treatment satisfaction and at 36 months they did not differ from the PC group in the overall SRS-22r score. Moreover, they achieved a statistically significant improvement in the scoliosis severity, although they showed lower scores in the self-image domain., Conclusion: In our patient's cohort, increased brace adherence does not compromise QoL and provides better treatment outcomes. However, more attention is needed to maintain good self-perception.

Background: The impact of ethnicity on the surgery outcomes of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis in the adult (AISA) is poorly understood. This study aimed to compare the surgery outcomes for AISA between the United States (US) and Japan (JP)., Methods: 171 surgically treated AISA (20-40y) were consecutively collected from 2 separate multicenter databases. Patients were propensity-score matched for age, gender, curve type, levels fused, and 2y postop spinal alignment. Demographic and radiographic parameters were compared between the US and JP at baseline and 2y post-op., Results: A total of 108 patients were matched by propensity score (age; US vs. JP: 29 ± 6 vs. 29 ± 7y, females: 76 vs. 76%, curve type [Schwab-SRS TypeT; TypeD; TypeL; TypeN]: 35; 35; 30; 0 vs. 37; 33; 30; 0%)] levels fused: 10 ± 4 vs. 10 ± 4, 2y thoracic curve:17 ± 13 vs. 17 ± 12°, 2y CSVL: 10 ± 8 vs. 11 ± 9 mm). Similar clinical improvement was achieved between US and JP (function; 4.2 ± 0.9 vs 4.3 ± 0.6, p = 0.60, pain; 3.8 ± 0.9 vs 4.1 ± 0.8, p = 0.13, satisfaction; 4.3 ± 0.9 vs 4.2 ± 0.7, p = 0.61, total; 4.0 ± 0.8 vs 4.1 ± 0.5, p = 0.60). The correlation analyzes indicated that postoperative SRS-22 subdomains correlated differently with satisfaction (all subdomains moderately correlated with satisfaction in the US while only pain and mental health correlated moderately with satisfaction in JP ([function: r = 0.61 vs 0.29, pain: r = . 72 vs 0.54, self-image: r = 0.72 vs 0.37, mental health: r = 0.64 vs 0.55])., Conclusions: Surgery for AISA was similarly effective in the US and JP. Satisfaction for spinal surgery among patients in different countries may not be different unless the procedure limits an individual's unique lifestyle that the patient expected to resume., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no relevant conflicts of interest. Justin S Smith, Christopher I. Shaffrey, Virginie Lafage, Frank J Schwab, Shay Bess, and Christopher P. Ames received grants from ISSG foundation during the conduct of the study., (Copyright © 2021 The Japanese Orthopaedic Association. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Although bracing for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis can prevent curve progression and reduce the risk for future surgery, children frequently do not wear their braces as prescribed. The purpose of this study is to investigate how a broad array of psychosocial characteristics predict future compliance with scoliosis brace wear., Methods: This was a single institution, prospective cohort study. All adolescents prescribed a first-time brace for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis were eligible. Patients and their parents completed a separate series of questionnaires that assessed baseline psychosocial characteristics across 6 domains: (1) brace-specific attitudes; (2) body image and self-esteem; (3) school performance and social relationships; (4) psychological health; (5) family functioning; and (6) demographics and scoliosis-specific details (242 total questions across 12 validated questionnaires). Objective brace compliance was collected using temperature-sensitive monitors. Defining compliance as percentage of brace prescription completed, comparative analyses were performed to identify baseline psychosocial characteristics that were associated with future wear. A composite measure (Bracing Fidelity Follow-Up Scale [BFFS]) of the 12 most predictive individual questions across all domains (both parent and adolescent) was constructed to help assess which adolescents were at highest risk of failure to wear their brace. Total BFFS score for each parent-adolescent dyad who completed all the included surveys was then determined by awarding one point for each factor that positively influenced future brace wear (maximum 12 points), and a correlation was calculated between total score and percent adherence to prescribed brace wear., Results: A total of 41 patients were included. On average, patients with high self-esteem, above average peer relationships and poor brace-specific attitudes had lower brace compliance, although patients with increased loneliness and parental religiousness had higher compliance. Body image, socioeconomic status, family dynamics, and school performance had no significant relationship with brace use. Total score on the Bracing Fidelity Follow-Up Scale (BFFS) was significantly associated with improved brace wear (r=0.687, P <0.001). Those with a score of 6 or above (n=15/33 [45%], median compliance 96%) were more reliable users (15/15 with compliance >75%), and those with a score of 5 or less (n=18/33 [55%], median compliance 50%) had less consistent brace wear (9/18 with compliance <50%)., Conclusion: This prospective study identifies numerous baseline psychosocial factors that are associated with future compliance with scoliosis brace wear. Although in need of further validation before widespread clinical application, the novel BFF scale offers a potential opportunity to partially discriminate between compliant and noncompliant scoliosis brace users such that supportive resources (eg, supportive counseling, peer-support groups, additional provider-based education, etc.) can be targeted to those patients most likely to benefit., Level of Evidence: II., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2022 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The 24-question Early-Onset Scoliosis Questionnaire (EOSQ-24) is a proxy measure assessing health-related quality of life (HRQoL) among patients with early-onset scoliosis (EOS). There exists an increasing need to assess HRQoL through a child's own perspective, particularly for older children and adolescents with EOS. The purpose of this study was to develop and validate a self-reported questionnaire, the Early-Onset Scoliosis Self-Report Questionnaire (EOSQ-SELF), to assess HRQoL in older children and adolescents with EOS., Methods: A literature review, an expert focus group, and patient interviews were used to generate a preliminary survey of appropriate domains and question items. This survey was provided to English-speaking patients with EOS who were 8 to 18 years of age and capable of answering survey questions. Content validity was assessed for clarity and relevance of questions. Confirmatory factors analysis was performed to reduce the number of items and determine domains that fit items. Reliability was evaluated by measuring the internal consistency of items and test-retest reliability. Construct validity was evaluated by convergent, discriminant, and known-group validity., Results: The literature review, expert focus group, and patient interviews identified 59 questions in 14 domains. Psychometric analysis reduced these to 30 questions across 12 domains: General Health, Pain/Discomfort, Pulmonary Function, Transfer, Physical Function/Daily Living, Participation, Fatigue/Energy Level, Sleep, Appearance, Relationships, Emotion, and Satisfaction. The final questionnaire was found to have good content and construct validity and adequate reliability., Conclusions: The EOSQ-SELF is a valid and reliable instrument for measuring self-reported HRQoL among older children and adolescents with EOS (ages 8 to 18 years). This will serve as an important research outcome measure and enhance clinical care by providing a better understanding of HRQoL for these patients., Level of Evidence: Diagnostic Level II . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence., Competing Interests: Disclosure: The Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest forms are provided with the online version of the article ( http://links.lww.com/JBJS/H106 )., (Copyright © 2022 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated.)

Study Design: Retrospective cohort study., Objective: To investigate whether patient-reported outcomes (PROs) were consistent at 2 and 5 years after corrective fusion surgery from the thoracic spine to the pelvis in patients with adult spinal deformity (ASD) and to analyze whether revision surgery affected long-term outcomes., Summary of Background Data: PROs up to 2 years after corrective surgeries for ASD have been well-studied, but there are few reports of mid- to long-term results., Methods: We retrospectively analyzed patients with ASD who underwent corrective fusion surgery from the thoracic spine to the pelvis between 2010 and 2015. We investigated radiographic parameters and PROs (Scoliosis Research Society 22r [SRS-22r], Oswestry Disability Index [ODI]) preoperatively and at 1, 2, and 5 years postoperatively, and the correlations between PROs at these time points. We also compared changes in PROs at 5 years in patients who underwent revision surgery and those who did not., Results: A total of 131 patients who underwent corrective fusion surgery from the thoracic spine to the pelvis were analyzed. The PROs at 1 and 5 years after surgery showed significant correlations in all SRS-22r domains (function [r  = 0.620], pain [r  = 0.577], self-image [r  = 0.563], mental health [r  = 0.589], subtotal [r  = 0.663], and ODI [r  = 0.654]). The PROs at 2 and 5 years after surgery showed significantly strong correlations in all domains (function [r  = 0.715], pain [r  = 0.678], self-image [r  = 0.653], mental health [r  = 0.675], subtotal [r  = 0.741], and ODI [r  = 0.746]). There were no significant differences in the change in PROs at 5 years in any domain in patients who underwent revision surgery (all P  > 0.05)., Conclusion: One-year postoperative PROs improved significantly. Two-year PROs correlated strongly with 5-year postoperative PROs, indicating that 2-year PROs can predict longer term outcomes. The need for revision surgery did not influence the mid- to long-term clinical outcomes of corrective fusion surgery for ASD.Level of Evidence: 3., Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest and Source of Funding: H.A., T.H., G.Y., T.B., Y.M., K.I., Y.W., K.N., K.K., and Y.M. have nothing to disclose., (Copyright © 2022 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Brace treatment for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis is recognized as effective if the brace is worn as prescribed (20 to 23 hrs/day). Because of its negative biopsychosocial impact on adolescent patients' quality of life, brace adherence is a common problem (average bracewear of 12 hrs/day). The purpose of this paper is to develop an interprofessional support intervention model to enhance brace adherence in adolescents with scoliosis., Methods: We enrolled 9 health professionals working with braced patients to participate in individual interviews. Interview guides were built following the Information-Motivation-Strategy Model (DiMatteo et al., Health Psychol Rev 6:74-91, 2012) and the Interprofessional Care Competency Framework (Education UoTCfI, Toronto Acad Health Sci Network, 2017). Thematic analysis was performed to identify the most relevant concepts for designing the intervention model. A panel of 5 clinical experts was recruited to review and validate the intervention model., Results: Participants suggested educational, motivational, functional, psychological and interprofessional teamwork strategies to improve the support provided to patients and parents and potentially increase brace adherence. Using the emerging themes and their relationships, we designed an Interprofessional Adherence Support (IPAS) intervention model that identifies the actors, activities, structure and intended impacts of the intervention. According to the expert panel, the IPAS model is highly relevant to respond to the brace adherence problem and has potential for implementation in practice., Conclusion: We designed an interprofessional support intervention model based on professional perspectives in response to the brace adherence problem in adolescents with scoliosis. Plans for implementation of the IPAS model at our scoliosis clinic are under development and considered essential for improving brace treatment outcomes., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Objective: Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) is a sideways curvature of the spine that can progress severely during adolescent development and require surgical intervention. This qualitative study was conducted to explore the psychosocial experiences of adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis during the presurgical stage of treatment., Methods: Fourteen adolescents with moderate-to-severe AIS aged 12-17 years participated in semistructured interviews and data were analyzed using inductive reflexive thematic analysis., Results: Four key themes were generated from the analysis. "Proceeding with Caution" described adolescents' adaptation to the physical impact of their AIS, while "Am I Different?" encompassed adolescents' perceptions of their changing appearance and visibility of their condition. "An Emotional Journey" captured the rollercoaster of emotions from shock at diagnosis to the daunting realization of the severity of their condition, while knowing others with AIS could ease the emotional burden. Finally, adolescents' concerns and expectations about their prospective surgery were captured by the theme "No Pain, No Gain", whereby they were often keen to put surgery behind them., Conclusions: Understanding and addressing adolescents' psychosocial support needs as they manage the challenges associated with idiopathic scoliosis is a key component of promoting better outcomes among this patient group. Clinical implications and opportunities for support provision are discussed., (© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society of Pediatric Psychology.)

Aims: To determine the value of scoliosis surgery, it is necessary to evaluate outcomes in domains that matter to patients. Since randomized trials on adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) are scarce, prospective cohort studies with comparable outcome measures are important. To enhance comparison, a core set of patient-related outcome measures is available. The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of AIS fusion surgery at two-year follow-up using the core outcomes set., Methods: AIS patients were systematically enrolled in an institutional registry. In all, 144 AIS patients aged ≤ 25 years undergoing primary surgery (median age 15 years (interquartile range 14 to 17) were included. Patient-reported (condition-specific and health-related quality of life (QoL); functional status; back and leg pain intensity) and clinician-reported outcomes (complications, revision surgery) were recorded. Changes in patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were analyzed using Friedman's analysis of variance. Clinical relevancy was determined using minimally important changes (Scoliosis Research Society (SRS)-22r), cut-off values for relevant effect on functioning (pain scores) and a patient-acceptable symptom state (PASS; Oswestry Disability Index)., Results: At baseline, 65 out of 144 patients (45%) reported numerical rating scale (NRS) back pain scores > 5. All PROMs significantly improved at two-year follow-up. Mean improvements in SRS-22r function (+ 1.2 (SD 0.6)), pain (+ 0.6 (SD 0.8)), and self-image (+ 1.1 (SD 0.7)) domain scores, and the SRS-22r total score (+ 0.5 (SD 0.5)), were clinically relevant. At two-year follow-up, 14 out of 144 patients (10%) reported NRS back pain > 5. Surgical site infections did not occur. Only one patient (0.7%) underwent revision surgery., Conclusion: Relevant improvement in functioning, condition-specific and health-related QoL, self-image, and a relevant decrease in pain is shown at two-year follow-up after fusion surgery for AIS, with few adverse events. Contrary to the general perception that AIS is a largely asymptomatic condition, nearly half of patients report significant preoperative back pain, which reduced to 10% at two-year follow-up. Cite this article: Bone Joint J  2022;104-B(2):265-273.

Purpose: To identify the prevalence and predictors of nonspecific back pain in primary thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients at 10 years after surgery., Methods: This was a case-control multi-center study. A query of patients who underwent surgical correction of major thoracic AIS between 1997 and 2007 with 10-year follow-up was reviewed. SRS-22 pain scores at 10 years were classified as below normal (≤ 2 standard deviations below average for controls of similar age/sex from published literature) or within/above the control range., Results: One hundred and seventy-one patients with an average of 10.5 ± 0.8-years follow-up were included. Average age at surgery was 14 ± 2 years. The rate of pain was 23% for males and 11% for females (p = 0.08). Differences in age, 10-year SRS mental health score, and radiographic measures were noted. Of 12 patients who underwent revision surgery, 42% reported below normal pain scores versus 11% in cases without revision (p = 0.012). Classification and regression tree (CART) analysis identified 10-year thoracic curve magnitude and 10-year mental health scores as significant predictors. Thoracic Cobb of ≤ 26° at 10 years was associated with a 7% rate of below normal pain scores compared to 27.5% when the curve was > 26° (OR = 4.8, p < 0.05). Of those with a curve ≤ 26°, no patients had abnormal pain if the SRS mental health score was > 4.2 and 15% had more pain than normal if mental health score was ≤ 4.2 (OR 23, p < 0.05)., Conclusion: Increased primary thoracic curve magnitude (> 26°) at 10 years was the primary predictor of increased pain. For patients with less coronal deformity (< 26°), a poor mental health score was associated with an increased rate of pain. Male gender and revision surgery may also play a role in increased pain, however, the overall frequency of these variables were low., Level of Evidence: Level 3., (© 2021. Scoliosis Research Society.)

Abstract: Health-related quality of life (HRQOL) assessment is considered among the most relevant outcome measures following conservative and surgical interventions for various spinal conditions. Several questions are available to evaluate HRQOL in these conditions. A more recent Italian Spine Youth Quality of Life (ISYQOL) questionnaire was developed for this purpose and showed high validity in measuring HRQOL.To translate and adapt the ISYQOL questionnaire into Arabic language (ISYQOL-Ar) and evaluate its validity and reliability, and to correlate it with the validated revised Scoliosis Research Society (SRS-22r)'s Arabic questionnaire in a cross-sectional multicenter study.The ISYQOL was translated, back-translated, and reviewed by an expert committee. Reliability assessment for the questionnaire domains was performed using Cronbach's alpha. For construct validation, the Pearson's correlation coefficient was used.A total of 115 patients were enrolled in the study and completed the ISYQOL-Ar and Arabic SRS-22r questionnaires. A total of 72 patients (63%) completed the first set of questionnaires, and 2 weeks later, 63 patients (55%) completed both sets of questionnaires, with 15.8 a mean age, 39.5° mean Cobb angle of 88.9% females. ISYQOL-Ar showed excellent validity, good reliability, and internal consistency for spine health and brace wear, with Cronbach's alpha > 0.6, similar to SRS-22r in the same cohort. The correlation was significant between ISYQOL-Ar and Arabic SRS-22r (Pearson's coefficient = 0.708, P < .001).The ISYQOL-Ar questionnaire is a reliable and valid outcome measure for the assessment of young patients with spinal deformity among the Arabic-speaking population., Competing Interests: The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose., (Copyright © 2021 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)

Background: The term "early-onset scoliosis" (EOS) refers to spinal deformities that develop before the age of 10 years. The aim of surgical treatment for EOS is stopping the progression of the curvature, maintaining the correction, ensuring the maximum growth of the vertebrae, and ensuring that the vertebrae remain mobile. Using magnetically controlled growing rods (MCGRs) in the treatment of EOS is intended to protect the patient from the negative effects of repetitive surgeries, increase patient compliance and satisfaction, and increase the speed of return to normal social life. Our aim was to report the early radiological evaluation findings and detect the changes in the quality of life of patients and their parents after the diagnosis of EOS and treatment with MCGRs., Methods: We performed a retrospective clinical study (level 4 case series) of 20 patients with a surgical indication for the treatment of EOS. The 20 patients had undergone treatment with MCGRs and lengthening procedures at 3-month intervals from August 2014 to August 2016. The mean patient age at surgery was 7.9 years (range, 4-10 years), and the mean length of follow-up was 14.9 months (range, 6-30 months). The preoperative, early postoperative, and final follow-up radiographs of all patients were obtained. The Cobb angle, thoracic kyphosis, spinal height, thoracic height, sagittal balance, coronal balance, shoulder balance, and pelvic balance were measured from the radiographs. All the patients had undergone preoperative and final follow-up respiratory function tests, and all the patients completed the Early Onset Scoliosis 24-item questionnaire (EOSQ-24). The outcome measures were the Cobb angle, thoracic kyphosis, spinal height, thoracic height, sagittal balance, coronal balance, shoulder balance, and pelvic balance. All the patients had undergone preoperative and final follow-up respiratory function tests, and the parents of every patient completed the Turkish version of the EOSQ-24., Results: The preoperative, early postoperative and final follow-up mean Cobb angles were 56.6° (range, 38°-93°), 30.5° (range, 13°-80°), and 33.5° (range, 14°-86°), respectively. These findings showed statistically significant improvement in the Cobb angle (P < 0.05). The thoracic height was also significantly increased. The preoperative, early postoperative, and final follow-up mean height was 181 mm (range, 123-224 mm), 200 mm (range, 164-245 mm), and 212 mm (range, 167-248 mm), respectively (P < 0.05). The measurements for spinal height had also increased significantly, with preoperative, early postoperative, and final follow-up values of 219 mm (range, 213-366 mm), 315 mm (range, 260-402 mm), and 338 mm (range, 261-406 mm), respectively (P < 0.05). The thoracic kyphosis measurement was 41° (range, 5°-65°) preoperatively, which had decreased significantly to 32.5° (range, 0°-53°) at the final follow-up (P < 0.05). Our measurements showed no statistically significant differences in the coronal and sagittal balance, pelvic balance, or shoulder balance. No significant differences were found between the preoperative and postoperative respiratory function test results. The assessment of the EOSQ-24 scores had demonstrated significant improvements in the mean scores at the final follow-up (P < 0.05). When different categories in the EOSQ-24 were evaluated separately, no statistically significant differences were found between the preoperative and final follow-up scores for general health, pain and discomfort, respiratory function, movement capability, physical function, or effects on daily life (P > 0.05). However, the exhaustion and energy levels, emotional state, effect of the disease on the parents and patient, and parent satisfaction scores had increased significantly from the preoperative assessment to the final follow-up (P < 0.05). The financial effect had decreased significantly at the final follow-up compared with the preoperative values (P < 0.05). Four patients had developed complications requiring further treatment, and none of the patients had developed infection that required surgical intervention., Conclusions: Our study showed that insertion of a MCGR is a safe procedure for treatment of EOS to correct the deformity and improve function in daily life. This method reduces the need for repetitive surgery and the likelihood of complications associated with other treatments. Thus, treatment with MCGRs increases patient satisfaction and facilitates patient compliance., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Abstract: There is an increasing concern about the impact of bracing on the quality of life (QoL) of patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). However, up to now, few multidimensional questionnaires on this impact are available in China. This study aimed to evaluate the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of Brace Questionnaire (C-BrQ).The BrQ was translated from Greek into Chinese with proper cross-cultural adaptation.An observational, cross-sectional study in Chinese patients with AIS was conducted to measure the temporal stability of C-BrQ using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). The effects of ceiling and floor were evaluated and the reliability was verified by examining the internal consistency. The C-BrQ domains were compared with the domains in Chinese version of Scoliosis Research Society-22 Outcomes Questionnaire (C-SRS-22) using Pearson correlation coefficient to assess the concurrent validity.A total of 208 patients were included in the study. The results of test-retest reliability for each dimension of C-BrQ were desirable. The floor or ceiling effects were not demonstrated in the C-BrQ and C-SRS-22. Satisfactory internal consistency was found in all the C-BrQ domains. Most C-BrQ and C-SRS-22 domains showed satisfactory correlation coefficients, except when vitality and school activity in C-BrQ were compared with self-image, mental health, and management satisfaction in C-SRS -22, respectively.C-BrQ is reliable in evaluating the QoL of AIS patients receiving brace treatment., Competing Interests: The authors report no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2021 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)

Background: Children with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) have reduced quality of life related to poor self-image, perhaps because of cosmetic concerns. However, there has not been a large-database epidemiologic study on the association between psychiatric disorders and scoliosis., Questions/purposes: Using the Korean National Health Insurance database, we asked: (1) How common are psychiatric disorders among children with AIS? (2) After controlling for gender, age, insurance type, and residential district, are psychiatric disorders more common among children with AIS than among age-matched controls?, Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted using sample datasets from the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service from 2012 to 2016, which is a 10% randomly extracted sample of total inpatients and outpatients each year. The mean number of total patients in each dataset was 1,047,603 ± 34,534. The mean number of children with AIS was 7409 ± 158 for each year. The age criteria was 10 to 19 years for the matching. Mood disorders, anxiety disorders, and behavioral disorders were selected as disorders possibly associated with AIS. We identified children with AIS who had any of the disorders above, and we obtained the prevalence of these disorders based on diagnostic codes. As an exploratory analysis, clinically meaningful variables were selected among the available codes in the dataset, and a univariable logistic regression test was performed for each variable. A multivariable logistic regression test with advanced variables was performed to identify the adjusted odds ratios of psychiatric disorders in children with AIS., Results: The median (range) prevalence of psychiatric disorders in children with AIS from 2012 to 2016 was 7% (6% to 7%). Compared with children who did not have AIS, and after controlling for gender, age, insurance type, and residential district, children with AIS were more likely to have psychiatric disorders in all 5 years. The adjusted ORs of psychiatric disorders in children with AIS compared with children who did not have AIS ranged from 1.47 to 1.74 (2012: OR 1.60 [95% CI 1.46 to 1.75]; p < 0.001; 2013: OR 1.73 [95% CI 1.58 to 1.89]; p < 0.001; 2014: OR 1.74 [95% CI 1.59 to 1.91]; p < 0.001; 2015: OR 1.71 [95% CI 1.56 to 1.88]; p < 0.001; 2016: OR 1.47 [95% CI 1.33 to 1.62]; p < 0.001)., Conclusion: Considering the higher prevalence of psychiatric disorders in children with AIS compared with children who did not have AIS, children with AIS and their parents should be counseled about the increased risk of deteriorating mental health of the patients, and surgeons should provide early referral to pediatric psychiatrists. Further studies should investigate the effect of the factors related to AIS, such as curve type, Cobb angle, and treatment modality., Level of Evidence: Level III, prognostic study., Competing Interests: All ICMJE Conflict of Interest Forms for authors and Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®editors and board members are on file with the publication and can be viewed on request. Each author certifies that neither he nor she, nor any member of his or her immediate family, has funding or commercial associations (consultancies, stock ownership, equity interest, patent/licensing arrangements, etc.) that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article., (Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the Association of Bone and Joint Surgeons.)

Background: Adolescent patients with moderate to severe idiopathic scoliosis who have completed their skeletal growth face a significant choice in their treatment path: watchful waiting or spinal fusion. Shared decision making (SDM) assists patients and clinicians to find treatments that make intellectual, practical and emotional sense. Our objective was to develop a tool that supports SDM for patients with scoliosis and their families., Methods: We used a user-centered design approach that included collaboration between patients, surgeons and SDM experts, observation of clinician encounters, and literature review. We focused on adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients 13 or more years of age with less than 1 year of growth remaining (Risser stage 3 or greater) and curves between 40 and 65 degrees., Results: We included 22 patients, and collected 22 video recordings. From these videos, we identified salient patient priorities for decision making including treatment benefits, surgical complications, pain, scheduling and recovery, and cost. For each theme, we conducted a focused review to obtain the best estimate of effect. Then, an expert SDM designer developed an electronic prototype called Scoliosis Choice., Conclusions: The initial prototype of the scoliosis SDM was finalized and is currently being field tested in clinic. Scoliosis Choice may help patients and surgeons better understand the potential risks and benefits of spinal fusion vs. observation for scoliosis treatment and improve validated measures of quality in patient-parent-surgeon communication., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Study Design: Longitudinal cohort., Objectives: The aim of this study was to examine the relationship between patient satisfaction, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and radiographic parameters in adult spine deformity (ASD) patients undergoing three-column osteotomies (3CO)., Summary of Background Data: Identifying factors that influence patient satisfaction in ASD is important. Evidence suggests Scoliosis Research Society-22R (SRS-22R) Self-Image domain correlates with patient satisfaction in patients with ASD., Methods: This is a retrospective review of ASD patients enrolled in a prospective, multicenter database undergoing a 3CO with complete SRS-22R pre-op and minimum 2-years postop. Spearman correlations were used to evaluate associations between the 2-year SRS Satisfaction score and changes in SRS-22R domain scores, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and radiographic parameters., Results: Of 135 patients eligible for 2-year follow-up, 98 patients (73%) had complete pre- and 2-year postop data. The cohort was mostly female (69%) with mean BMI of 29.7 kg/m2 and age of 61.0 years. Mean levels fused was 12.9 with estimated blood loss of 2695 cc and OR time of 407 minutes; 27% were revision surgeries. There was a statistically significant improvement between pre- and 2-year post-op PROMs and all radiographic parameters except Coronal Vertical Axis. The majority of patients had an SRS Satisfaction score of ≥3.0 (90%) or ≥4.0 (68%), consistent with a moderate ceiling effect. Correlations of patient satisfaction was significant for Pain (0.43, P < 0.001), Activity (0.39, P < 0.001), Mental (0.38, P = 0.001) Self-Image (0.52, P < 0.001). ODI and Short-Form-36 Physical component summary had a moderate correlation as well, with mental component summary being weak. There was no statistically significant correlation between any radiographic or operative parameters and patient satisfaction., Conclusion: There was statistically significant improvement in all PROMs and radiographic parameters, except coronal vertical axis at 2 years in ASD patients undergoing 3CO. Improvement in SRS Self-Image domain has the strongest correlation with patient satisfaction.Level of Evidence: 3., (Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The Classification of Early-Onset Scoliosis (C-EOS) allows providers to differentiate patients, for clinical and research purposes, on the basis of the etiology of their disease as well as radiographic parameters. The Early Onset Scoliosis Questionnaire (EOSQ) is the first disease-specific, parent-reported HRQOL (health-related quality-of-life) outcome measure for this condition. We sought to determine the influence of the C-EOS etiology designation, radiographic parameters, and medical comorbidities on EOSQ scores to differentiate quality of life in this heterogeneous patient population. We hypothesized that baseline EOSQ scores for patients with EOS would be strongly affected by the C-EOS etiology designation., Methods: The analysis included prospectively enrolled patients with EOSQ scores recorded in a multicenter EOS database prior to intervention for the EOS. EOSQ scores were compared across C-EOS etiologies, severity of disease based on radiographic measurements, and patient comorbidities prior to scoliosis intervention., Results: Six hundred and ten patients with EOS were available for analysis; 119 had congenital, 201 had idiopathic, 156 had neuromuscular, and 134 had syndromic EOS. In multivariate analysis, neuromuscular and syndromic etiologies were associated with lower scores than congenital and idiopathic etiologies in many EOSQ domains including general health, transfer, daily living, fatigue/energy level, and emotion. Patients with neuromuscular EOS had the lowest EOSQ scores in general. Congenital and idiopathic EOS did not differ from each other in any EOSQ domain. Coronal Cobb and kyphosis angles had significant inverse but generally weak correlations with EOSQ domains. Individual medical comorbidities had a minor effect on certain domains while American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class and total number of comorbidities had inverse correlations with most domains., Conclusions: The underlying etiology of EOS appears to have a significant influence on the parent-reported HRQOL outcomes of the disease. Specifically, syndromic and neuromuscular C-EOS diagnoses are associated with lower EOSQ scores before treatment compared with congenital and idiopathic diagnoses. Radiographic measurements of severity have a relatively small influence on EOSQ scores. These baseline differences in C-EOS-designated etiology should be accounted for in studies comparing outcomes of treatment for this heterogeneous patient population., Level of Evidence: Prognostic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence., Competing Interests: Disclosure: This project was supported by the Angela S. M. Kuo award through the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America. Funding was directed to the PSSG. On the Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest forms, which are provided with the online version of the article, one or more of the authors checked “yes” to indicate that the author had a relevant financial relationship in the biomedical arena outside the submitted work; “yes” to indicate that the author had a patent and/or copyright, planned, pending, or issued, broadly relevant to this work; and “yes” to indicate that the author had other relationships or activities that could be perceived to influence, or have the potential to influence, what was written in this work (http://links.lww.com/JBJS/G291)., (Copyright © 2021 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated.)

Study Design: Longitudinal., Objectives: To evaluate whether the rate of patients who report low health-related quality of life (HRQOL) scores at 2 years following surgical correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) improves by 5 years postoperatively., Summary of Background Data: HRQOL scores are dependent upon a number of factors and even in instances of good surgical correction of a spinal deformity, are not guaranteed to be high postoperatively. Understanding how a low HRQOL score varies over the postoperative period can help surgeons more effectively counsel patients and temper expectations., Methods: A multicenter database was reviewed for patients with both 2 and 5-year follow-up after spinal fusion and instrumentation for AIS. From a cohort of 916 patients, 52 patients with low HRQOL scores at their 2-year follow-up were identified and reevaluated at 5-year follow-up. A low HRQOL outcome was defined as having SRS-22 domain or total scores less than 2 standard deviations below the mean score. Reoperations were also evaluated to determine if they were associated with HRQOL scores., Results: Of those patients with low SRS-22 HRQOL scores at 2 years postoperatively, improvements were seen in all SRS-22 domains and total scores at the 5-year time point. The greatest change was seen in the satisfaction category where 41 patients showed improvement. The rate of reoperations during this period did not significantly impact patient-reported outcomes., Conclusions: Having a low HRQOL score 2 years after surgery for AIS does not guarantee a low score 5 years after surgery. Promisingly, most patients demonstrate some improvement in all domains for patient-reported SRS-22 scores at 5-year compared to 2-year follow-up. Understanding the longer term postoperative evolution in patient-reported outcomes may help surgeons to effectively manage and counsel patients who are dissatisfied in the short term.Level of Evidence: 3., (Copyright © 2020 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Study Design: Retrospective review of prospective multicenter database., Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate how preoperative mental status affects preoperative and postoperative disability and health scores in adult spinal deformity (ASD) patients., Summary of Background Data: The relationship between health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and depression has previously been documented. However, the influence of depression on clinical outcomes among ASD patients is not well understood., Methods: ASD patients with minimum 2-year follow-up were stratified based on preoperative mental health measured by Short Form 36 (SF-36) mental component score (MCS). Patients with MCS in the 25th and 75th percentile of the cohort were designated as having low and high MCS, respectively. After matching by preoperative demographics and deformity, pre- and post-HRQOL were compared between the two groups. Further analysis was performed to identify individualized questions on the SF-36 that could potentially screen for patients with low MCS., Results: Five hundred thirteen patients were assessed (58.4 years' old, 79% women, mean MCS 45.5). Thresholds for low and high MCS cohorts were 35.0 and 57.3, respectively. After matching by preoperative alignment, low MCS patients had worse Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) (52.3 ± 17.0 vs. 35.7 ± 14.6, P < 0.001) and Scoliosis Research Society-22R scores for all domains (all P < 0.001) compared to high MCS patients. Similar results were maintained at 2-year postop, with low MCS patients having a worse ODI (35.2 ± 20.2 vs. 19.7 ± 18.6, P < 0.001) and MCS (42.4 ± 13.5 vs. 58.6 ± 7.1, P < 0.001). Despite similar preoperative Physical Component Score (PCS), low MCS patients were less likely to reach MCID for PCS (46.1% vs. 70.6%, P < 0.01) and had a lower satisfaction at 2-year follow-up (3.88 ± 1.07 vs. 4.39 ± 0.94, P < 0.001). Questions 5a, 9d, and 9f on the SF-36 were found to be independent predictors of low MCS., Conclusion: ASD patients with low MCS are more likely to experience functional limitations before and after surgery and are less likely to be satisfied postoperatively, even when similar clinical goals are achieved. Incorporating psychological factors may assist in decision making.Level of Evidence: 3., (Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Study Design: Prospective cross-sectional study., Objective: We designed this study to investigate whether adolescent girls with idiopathic scoliosis show a predisposition for eating disorders (EDs) and alterations of the quality of life and body image self-perception, compared to same-age healthy females., Summary of Background Data: Idiopathic scoliosis is the most common spinal deformity of adolescence. Recent findings about the impairment of the self-body image in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis provide a common trait of scoliosis and EDs and could lead to the suspicion of an association between these two pathological conditions. Despite this, current literature shows the lack of evident results about the impact of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) on the possibility to develop of EDs., Methods: One hundred forty-four females with diagnosis of AIS (aged 10-18 years) formed the scoliosis group. One hundred forty-six same-age healthy girls were enrolled in the control group. For all subjects, we considered sport practice. Only for Scoliosis Group, we also considered the severity of scoliosis, the use of brace and the practice of physiotherapy scoliosis-specific exercises. The participants were asked to answer to the Scoliosis Research Society-22 revised Patient Questionnaire (SRS-22r) and the Eating Disorders Inventory (EDI)., Results: In the scoliosis group, significantly lower scores on the SRS-22r total and in the self-image domain were detected. The two groups showed differences in the total EDI score and in the body dissatisfaction EDI's domain. Severity of scoliosis was correlated with worse SRS-22r total score and SRS-22r self-image domain score. There were no differences in the scores of the SRS-22r and EDI between braced and nonbraced subjects. Lower scores in SRS-22r total and self-image domain were found in girls who practiced physiotherapy exercises. Subjects who practiced a sport showed higher SRS-22r total scores., Conclusion: The AIS cohort in our study demonstrated lower levels of eating psychopathology than healthy controls. Surprisingly, eating behavior does not seem to be affected by orthotic management. However, quality of life and self-body image could be impaired in scoliotic girls, especially when they practice physiotherapy exercises, whereas those who practice sport seem to be preserved in this regard.Level of Evidence: 4., (Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Study Design: Retrospective longitudinal cohort study., Objective: This study aimed to elucidate factors affecting the likelihood of achieving minimum clinically important difference (MCID) to patient-reported outcomes defined by the Scoliosis Research Society-22r (SRS-22r) among patients with adult spinal deformity (ASD) who underwent extensive corrective fusion surgery from the thoracic spine to the pelvis., Summary of Background Data: Achieving MCID for SRS-22r parameters was a measure of surgical efficacy. Patient characteristics and surgical and radiographic factors that affect the likelihood of achieving MCID for SRS-22r parameters are unknown., Methods: Data from patients with ASD who underwent extensive corrective fusion surgery from the thoracic spine to the pelvis during 2010 to 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. Data from a total of 167 patients with ≥2 years of follow-up were included. Multivariate analysis was used to investigate factors associated with the likelihood of achieving MCID for each of the SRS-22r domains (Function, Pain, Subtotal) 2 years after surgery. The following MCID values were used: 0.90 for Function, 0.85 for Pain, and 1.05 for the Subtotal., Results: MCID achievement rate was 36.5% for Function, 46.1% for Pain, and 44.3% for the Subtotal domain. In multivariate analysis, preoperative SRS-22r Function (odds ratio [OR] = 0.204, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.105-0.396) increased the likelihood of achieving MCID for SRS-22r Function. Preoperative SRS-22r Subtotal (OR = 0.211, 95% CI, 0.107-0.413), preoperative pelvic tilt (OR = 1.072, 95% CI, 1.012-1.136), preoperative pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis (OR = 0.965, 95% CI, 0.934-0.997), and postoperative sagittal vertical axis (OR = 0.985, 95% CI, 0.974-0.995) affected the likelihood of achieving MCID for the SRS-22r Subtotal., Conclusion: Patients with poor preoperative health-related quality of life were more likely to achieve improvement in SRS-22r parameters after extensive corrective fusion surgery for ASD. Achieving postoperative sagittal alignment increased the likelihood of achieving MCID for the SRS-22r Subtotal domain.Level of Evidence: 3., (Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)