Search

BACKGROUND: The effect of preoperative mental health on outcomes after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is of increasing interest. The purpose of this study was to utilize patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) to compare outcomes after ACDF in patients with and without poor mental health. We hypothesized that patients with worse baseline mental health would report worse outcomes after surgery. METHODS: Patients undergoing ACDF for degenerative cervical spondylosis with at least 12 months of follow-up were included. Outcomes collected before and after surgery included the RAND-36, Neck Disability Index (NDI), EuroQol 5-dimension (EQ-5D), and Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) score. RESULTS: Seventy-one patients were included and assigned to the depression or nondepression group based on baseline mental health. The depression group had worse baseline preoperative scores across all PROMs: NDI (44.2 vs 36.8, P = 0.05), RAND (1511.4 vs 2198.18, P < 0.001), EQ-5D (12.55 vs 10.14, P < 0.001), and SANE (56.3 vs 72.9, P < 0.001). Postoperatively, the depression group had worse scores at the final follow-up for RAND (2242.8 vs 2662.2, P = 0.03) and SANE (71.5 vs 80.8, P = 0.02). Both groups experienced improvements with ACDF across all PROMs. The changes in each PROM were not statistically significant between groups. There were no statistically significant differences in the percentage of patients achieving the minimal clinically important difference across PROMs. CONCLUSION: This study is the first to utilize the RAND-36, EQ-5D, NDI, and SANE scores to assess preoperative mental health and its effect on postoperative outcomes after ACDF. While poor preoperative mental health status yielded significantly worse baseline and postoperative outcomes scores, patients experienced significant improvement in symptoms after ACDF. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Clinicians should be aware of the effects of poor mental health status on clinical outcomes in patients undergoing anterior cervical fusion, but can still expect significant clinical improvements after surgery.

Study Design Retrospective review (level of evidence III). Objective Surgical care patterns for lumbar disc herniation (LDH), a common musculoskeletal condition of high relevance to the Military Health System (MHS), have not been described or compared across the direct care and purchased care MHS components. This study aimed to describe surgery rates in MHS beneficiaries who were diagnosed with LDH in direct care versus purchased care and to evaluate characteristics associated with the location of surgery. Differences in care patterns for LDH may suggest unexpected variation within the centrally managed MHS. Methods We described 1-year rates of surgery among beneficiaries who were diagnosed with LDH in direct care versus purchased care. Among beneficiaries who were diagnosed in direct care and had surgery, multivariable logistic regression models were used to identify characteristics associated with surgery location. Results We identified 726,638 MHS beneficiaries who were diagnosed with LDH in direct care or purchased care during the 9-year study period. One-year surgery rates were 10.1% in beneficiaries who were diagnosed in direct care versus 11.3% in beneficiaries who were diagnosed in purchased care. Among the 7467 patients who were diagnosed in direct care and had surgery within 1 year, characteristics associated with lower probability of surgery in purchased care versus direct care included diagnosing facility type (hospital with a neurosurgery or spine specialty versus clinic (odds ratio [OR], 0.12 (95% CI, 0.10-0.15)), Navy versus Army (OR, 0.24 (95% CI, 0.21-0.28)), and diagnosing facility specialty (Medical Expense and Performance Reporting System) (surgical care (OR, 0.33 (95% CI, 0.27-0.40)) and orthopedic care (OR, 0.39 (95% CI, 0.33-0.46)) versus primary care. The presence of comorbidities was associated with higher probability of surgery in purchased care versus direct care (OR, 1.20 (95% CI, 1.06-1.36)). Conclusions The 1-year rate of surgery for LDH was modestly higher in beneficiaries who were diagnosed in purchased care versus direct care. Among patients who were diagnosed in direct care, several patient-level and facility-level characteristics were associated with receiving surgery in purchased care, suggesting potentially unexpected variation in care utilization across components of the MHS.

Objective To assess the feasibility, patient/provider satisfaction, and perceived value of telehealth spine consultation after rapid conversion from traditional in-office visits during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods Data were obtained for patients undergoing telehealth visits with spine surgeons in the first 3 weeks after government restriction of elective surgical care at 4 sites (March 23, 2020, to April 17, 2020). Demographic factors, technique-specific elements of the telehealth experience, provider confidence in diagnostic and therapeutic assessment, patient/surgeon satisfaction, and perceived value were collected. Results A total of 128 unique visits were analyzed. New (74 [58%]), preoperative (26 [20%]), and postoperative (28 [22%]) patients were assessed. A total of 116 (91%) visits had successful connection on the first attempt. Surgeons felt very confident 101 times (79%) when assessing diagnosis and 107 times (84%) when assessing treatment plan. The mean and median patient satisfaction was 89% and 94%, respectively. Patient satisfaction was significantly higher for video over audio-only visits (P < 0.05). Patient satisfaction was not significantly different with patient age, location of chief complaint (cervical or thoracolumbar), or visit type (new, preoperative, or postoperative). Providers reported that 76% of the time they would choose to perform the visit again in telehealth format. Sixty percent of patients valued the visit cost as the same or slightly less than an in-office consultation. Conclusions This is the first study to demonstrate the feasibility and high patient/provider satisfaction of virtual spine surgical consultation, and appropriate reimbursement and balanced regulation for spine telehealth care is essential to continue this existing work.

As physician burnout and wellness become increasingly recognized as vital themes for the medical community to address, the topic of chronic work-related conditions in surgeons must be further evaluated. While improving ergonomics and occupational health have been long emphasized in the executive and business worlds, particularly in relation to company morale and productivity, information within the surgical community remains relatively scarce. Chronic peripheral nerve compression syndromes, hand osteoarthritis, cervicalgia and back pain, as well as other repetitive musculoskeletal ailments affect many spinal surgeons. The use of ergonomic training programs, an operating microscope or exoscope, powered instruments for pedicle screw placement, pneumatic Kerrison punches and ultrasonic osteotomes, as well as utilizing multiple surgeons or microbreaks for larger cases comprise several methods by which spinal surgeons can potentially improve workspace health. As such, it is worthwhile exploring these areas to potentially improve operating room ergonomics and overall surgeon longevity.

BACKGROUND The surgical management of adult spinal deformity (ASD) is a major surgical undertaking associated with considerable perioperative risk and a substantial complication profile. Although the natural history and risk factors associated with proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) and proximal junctional failure are widely reported, distal junctional failure (DJF) is less well understood. STUDY DESIGN A systematic review was carried out. OBJECTIVES The primary objective is to identify the risk factors associated with DJF. The secondary objective is to delineate the incidence rate and causative factors associated with DJF. METHODS A systematic review of articles in Medline/PubMed and The Cochrane Library databases was performed according to preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses guidelines. Data was collated to determine the prevalence of DJF and overall revision rates, and identify potential risk factors for development of DJF. RESULTS Twelve studies were included for systematic review. There were 81/2261 (3.6%) cases of DJF. Overall, DJF represented 27.3% of all revision surgeries. Anterior-posterior surgery had a reduced incidence of postoperative DJF [5.0% vs. 8.7%; P=0.08; relative risk (RR)=1.73], as did patients below 60 years of age at the time of surgery (2.9% vs. 3.9%; P=0.09; RR=1.34). There was a higher incidence of DJF among those patients who received interbody fusion (9.9% vs. 5.1%; P=0.06; RR=1.93) compared with those who did not. However, none of these findings reached statistical significance. There were significantly more rates of DJF for fusions ending on L5 compared with constructs fused to the sacrum (11.7% vs. 3.6%; P=0.02; RR=3.28). CONCLUSIONS Cohorts 60 years and above of age at the time of surgery and patients managed with posterior-only fusion or interbody fusion have increased incidences of DJF. Fusion to L5 instead of the sacrum significantly influences DJF rates. However, the quality of available evidence is low and further high-quality studies are required to more robustly analyze the clinical, radiographic, and surgical risk factors associated with the development of DJF after ASD surgery.

Retrospective cohort.To evaluate the single assessment numerical evaluation (SANE) as a patient reported outcomes measure (PROM) after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF), by comparing to legacy measures.We included all patients undergoing ACDF with at least one year of follow up with complete PROM data. Patients completed the Neck Disability Index (NDI), the RAND-36 and the EuroQual Five Dimension (EQ-5D) scale, as well as the one-question SANE, pre- and post-operatively. Validity of SANE compared with other PROMs was determined utilizing Pearson's correlation (ρ), proportional bias (B), responsiveness, minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and agreement.Sixty-nine patients were included. There were moderate-to-strong correlations at a minimum of one-year follow-up between the SANE and NDI (ρ = -0.73, P 0.0001), RAND (ρ = 0.80, P 0.0001), and EQ-5D (ρ = -0.66, P 0.0001). No significant proportional bias was found for the SANE when compared to the RAND (B = 0.03, p = 0.99), NDI (B = -0.003, p = 0.99), or EQ-5D (B = -0.0007, p = 0.99). Responsiveness for SANE was statistically similar to all other PROMs. The MCID for SANE was determined to be 10.5, with 42% of patients achieving the MCID. Bland-Altman plots demonstrated high agreement between all PROMs.We found the SANE score provides clinically important patient outcomes data after ACDF, despite only requiring answering one question. The SANE performs comparably to more burdensome health questionnaires. The SANE score may offer spine surgeons the option to easily and quickly collect clinically relevant data on their surgical patients.

BACKGROUND: Sarcopenia, defined as decreased skeletal mass, is an independent marker of frailty that is not accounted for by other risk-stratification methods. Recent studies have demonstrated a clear association between paraspinal sarcopenia and worse patient-reported outcomes and complications after spine surgery. Currently, sarcopenia is characterized according to either a quantitative assessment of the paraspinal cross-sectional area or a qualitative analysis of paraspinal fatty infiltration on MRI. No studies have investigated whether the cervical paraspinal cross-sectional area correlates with fatty infiltration of the cervical paraspinal muscles on advanced imaging. QUESTION/PURPOSE: Do patients undergoing anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) with increasing paraspinal fatty degeneration on advanced imaging also demonstrate decreased cervical paraspinal cross-sectional area? METHODS: Between 2011 and 2017, 98 patients were prospectively enrolled in a database of patients undergoing one- to three-level ACDF for degenerative conditions at a single institution. To be eligible for this prospective study, patients were required to undergo an MRI before surgery, be older than 18 years, and have no previous history of cervical spine surgery. Two independent reviewers, both surgeons not involved in the patients’ care and who were blinded to the clinical outcomes, retrospectively assessed the paraspinal cross-sectional area and Goutallier classification of the right-sided paraspinal muscle complex. We then compared the patients’ Goutallier grades with their paraspinal cross-sectional area measurements. We identified 98 patients for inclusion. Using the Fuchs modification of the Goutallier classification, we classified the fatty degeneration of 41 patients as normal (Goutallier Grades 0 to 1), that of 47 patients as moderate (Grade 2), and that of 10 patients as severe (Grades 3 to 4). We used ANOVA to compare all means between groups. RESULTS: There was no difference in the mean paraspinal cross-sectional area of the obliquus capitus inferior (normal 295 ± 81 mm(2); moderate 317 ± 104 mm(2); severe 300 ± 79 mm(2); p = 0.51), multifidus (normal 146 ± 59 mm(2); moderate 170 ± 70 mm(2); severe 192 ± 107 mm(2); p = 0.11), or sternocleidomastoid (normal 483 ± 150 mm(2); moderate 468 ± 149 mm(2); severe 458 ± 183 mm(2); p = 0.85) among patients with mild, moderate, and severe fatty infiltration based on Goutallier grading. There was a slightly greater longus colli cross-sectional area in the moderate and severe fatty infiltration groups (74 ± 22 mm(2) and 66 ± 18 mm(2), respectively) than in the normal group (63 ± 15 mm(2); p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: Because our study demonstrates minimal association between paraspinal cross-sectional area and fatty infiltration of the cervical paraspinals, we recommend that physicians use the proven qualitative assessment of paraspinal fatty infiltration during preoperative evaluation of patients who are candidates for ACDF. Future studies investigating the relationship between cervical paraspinal cross-sectional area and patient-reported outcomes after ACDF are necessary to lend greater strength to this recommendation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, diagnostic study.

Degenerative disk disease is a pathologic state associated with axial skeletal pain, radiculopathy, and myelopathy, and will inevitably increase in prevalence in parallel with an aging population. The objective of regenerative medicine is to convert the inflammatory, catabolic microenvironment of degenerative disease into an anti-inflammatory, anabolic environment. This comprehensive review discusses and outlines both in vitro and in vivo efficacy of regenerative treatment modalities for degenerative disk disease, such as; mesenchymal stem cells, gene therapy, tissue engineering, and biologic treatments. To date, clinical applications have been limited secondary to a lack of standardized high quality clinical data. Additional research should focus on determining the optimal cellular makeup and concentration for each of these interventions. Nevertheless, modern medicine provides a new avenue of confronting disease, with methods surpassing traditional methods of removing the pathology in question, as regenerative medicine provides the opportunity to recover from the diseased state.

Study design Retrospective cohort. Objective To determine surgery-free survival of patients receiving conservative management of lumbar disc herniation (LDH) in the military healthcare system (MHS) and risk factors for surgical intervention. Summary of background data Radiculopathy from LDH is a major cause of morbidity and cost. Methods The Military Data Repository was queried for all patients diagnosed with LDH from FY2011-2018; the earliest such diagnosis in a military treatment facility (MTF) was kept for each patient as the initial diagnosis. Follow-up time to surgical intervention was defined as the time from diagnosis to first encounter for lumbar microdiscectomy or lumbar decompression in either a MTF or in the civilian sector. The Military Data Repository was also queried for history of tobacco use at any time during MHS care, age at the time of diagnosis, sex, MHS beneficiary category, and diagnosing facility characteristics. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were used to evaluate the associations of patient and diagnosing facility characteristics with time to surgical intervention. Results A total of 84,985 MHS beneficiaries including 62,771 active duty service members were diagnosed with LDH in a MTF during the 8-year study period. A total of 10,532 (12.4%) MHS beneficiaries, including 7650 (10.9%) active duty, failed conservative management onto surgical intervention with lumbar microdiscectomy or lumbar decompression. Median follow-up time of the cohort was 5.2 (interquartile range 2.6, 7.5) years. Among all healthcare beneficiaries, several patient-level (younger age, male sex, and history of tobacco use) and facility-level characteristics (hospital vs. clinic and surgical care vs. primary care clinic) were independently associated with higher risk of surgical intervention. Conclusion LDH compromises military readiness and negatively impacts healthcare costs. MHS beneficiaries with LDH have a good prognosis with approximately 88% of patients successfully completing conservative management. However, strategies to improve outcomes of conservative management in LDH should address risks associated with both patient and facility characteristics.Level of Evidence: 4.

Study Design: Retrospective database review. Objectives: The incidence and risk factors for surgical delay of multilevel spine fusion for adult spinal deformity (ASD), and the complications corresponding therewith, remain unknown. The objectives of this study are to assess the incidence and risk factors for unexpected delay of elective multilevel spinal fusions on the date of surgery as well as the postoperative complications associated with these delays. Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of the ACS-NSQIP database on patients undergoing elective spinal instrumentation of greater than 7 levels for ASD between the years 2005 and 2015. Preoperative risk factors for delay and postoperative complications were compared between the cohorts of patients with and without surgical delays. Results: Multivariate analysis of 1570 (15.6%) patients identified advanced age, male sex, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Class 4, and history of smoking as independent risk factors for delay. Patients experiencing surgical delay demonstrated longer operative times, increased intraoperative bleeding, longer hospitalizations, and significantly higher rates of postoperative complications. Patients experiencing delay demonstrated an almost 7-fold increase in mortality rate (3.4% vs 0.5%, P < .001). Conclusions: Delays in elective surgical care for spinal deformity are negatively related to patient outcomes. Advanced age, male sex, increased ASA class, and a history of smoking cigarettes place patients at risk for surgical delay of multilevel spinal fusion. Patients experiencing surgical delay are at higher risk for postoperative complications, including a 7-fold increase in mortality. These findings suggest that ASD surgery should be postponed in patients experiencing a delay, until modifiable risk factors can be medically optimized, and perhaps postponed indefinitely in those with nonmodifiable risk factors.

Study Design: Retrospective cohort study. Objectives: Studies in the lumbar spine suggest a correlation between sarcopenia and worse patient outcomes. The purpose of this study was to determine whether paraspinal Goutalier grade of fat degeneration is associated with patient-reported outcomes in patients undergoing anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). Methods: We performed a retrospective review of a prospective cohort of patients undergoing 1- to 3-level ACDF at a single institution between the years 2011-2014. We utilized preoperative magnetic resonance images to classify patients into Goutalier grades. Patient-reported outcomes, including Neck Disability Index (NDI), RAND score, and EQ-5D score were collected and analyzed according to patients’ Goutalier grade. Results: We identified 69 patients for inclusion. A total of 29 patients were classified as Goutalier 0-1 (group 1), 29 were Goutalier 1.5-2 (group 2), and 11 were Goutalier 2.5-4.0 (group 3). All Goutalier groups experienced significant improvement in all 3 outcome scores. Average postoperative NDI scores were 25.3 in group 1, 13.9 in group 2, and 25.1 in group 3 ( P = .02). The percentage of patients in each group reporting worse disability after surgery was 17.2%, 3.3%, and 9.1%, respectively ( P = .05). No statistically significant difference was seen between groups in postoperative EQ-5D ( P = .07) or RAND scores ( P > .05). Conclusions: The present study is the first to assess the association between cervical paraspinal muscle Goutalier grade and patient-reported outcomes following ACDF. Based on our study, patients with worse cervical paraspinal degeneration may benefit from improved symptom relief in comparison to patients with a lesser degree of degeneration undergoing ACDF.

Introduction Although the role of intrasite antibiotic powder in preventing surgical site infections (SSIs) has been extensively explored in spinal surgery, it remains underevaluated in the other orthopaedic subspecialties. This systematic review examines the utilization of intrawound antibiotic powder as a prophylactic measure against SSIs in orthopaedic procedures. Methods Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, electronic searches were conducted on Ovid MEDLINE, and PubMed. Only English language, nonspine clinical studies published before May 2018 were included. Results The initial search identified 179 individual citations, and 11 studies met the eligibility criteria. All included studies were level III retrospective studies. Represented subspecialties included total joint arthroplasty, upper extremity, foot and ankle, and trauma. Eight studies demonstrated a statistically significant decrease in SSIs with the use of intrasite antibiotic powder. Discussion There are no current guidelines for the use of intrasite antibiotic powder for the prevention of SSIs in orthopaedic procedures. Despite the lack of high-quality evidence available in the literature, published smaller studies do suggest a significant protective effect. However, recommendations with regard to this technique after common orthopaedic procedures cannot yet be made.

We sought to characterize the association between lumbar corticosteroid injections and postoperative infection rate for patients in the Military Health System undergoing lumbar arthrodesis. The Military Health System Data Repository was searched for all patients undergoing lumbar arthrodesis from 2009 to 2014. Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes were used to identify the subset of patients who also received preoperative lumbar corticosteroid injections. These patients were stratified by timing, type, and number of injections. Infection rates were compared to the control group of patients who did not receive preoperative lumbar corticosteroid injections. The search identified 3403 patients who had undergone lumbar arthrodesis from 2009 to 2014 within the Military Health System. 612 patients had received lumbar corticosteroid injections prior to surgery (348 epidural, 264 facet). The control group consisted of the remaining 2791 patients. Overall post-operative infection rate was 1.47% with an infection rate in the injection group of 1.14% versus 1.54% in the control group. When stratified by time, infection rates ranged from 0% to 1.85% in the injection groups. No differences between injection and control groups reached statistical significance in any subgroup analysis. Post-operative infection rate is not significantly increased in patients receiving lumbar corticosteroid injections (LCSIs) prior to lumbar arthrodesis. No differences were observed in infection rates based on timing, type, or number of injections prior to surgery.

Many options currently exist for achieving lumbar fusion. A variety of techniques have been described. The challenge for spine surgeons is choosing which approach is ideal for the given circumstances, and to do this, a good understanding of the available evidence is necessary. The evidence regarding fusion approach, interbody cage utilization, bone grafting, biologics, and osteoporosis is reviewed.

Retrospective cohort study.The present study is the first to assess the impact of paraspinal sarcopenia on patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) following posterior cervical decompression and fusion (PCDF).While the impact of sarcopenia on PROMs following lumbar spine surgery is well-established, the impact of sarcopenia on PROMs following PCDF has not been investigated.We performed a retrospective review of patients undergoing PCDF from C2 to T2 at a single institution between the years 2017 and 2020. Two independent reviewers who were blinded to the clinical outcome scores utilized axial cuts of T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging sequences to assess fatty infiltration of the bilateral multifidus muscles at the C5-C6 level and classify patients according to the Fuchs Modification of the Goutalier grading system. PROMs were then compared between subgroups.We identified 99 patients for inclusion in this study, including 28 patients with mild sarcopenia, 45 patients with moderate sarcopenia, and 26 patients with severe sarcopenia. There was no difference in any preoperative PROM between the subgroups. Mean postoperative Neck Disability Index scores were lower in the mild and moderate sarcopenia subgroups (12.8 and 13.4, respectively) than in the severe sarcopenia subgroup (21.0, P0.001). A higher percentage of patients with severe multifidus sarcopenia reported postoperative worsening of their Neck Disability Index (10 patients, 38.5%; P =0.003), Visual Analog Scale Neck scores (7 patients, 26.9%; P =0.02), Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System Physical Component Scores (10 patients, 38.5%; P =0.02), and Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System Mental Component Scores (14 patients, 53.8%; P =0.02).Patients with more severe paraspinal sarcopenia demonstrate less improvement in neck disability and physical function postoperatively and are substantially more likely to report worsening PROMs postoperatively.3.

Retrospective cohort study.The purposes of this study were to determine the rate of improvement of significant preoperative weakness, identify risk factors for failure to improve, and characterize the motor recovery of individual motor groups.While neck and arm pain reliably improve following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF), the frequency and magnitude of motor recovery following ACDF remain unclear.We performed a retrospective review of patients undergoing 1-4-level ACDF at a single institution between September 2015 and June 2016. Patients were subdivided into 2 groups based upon the presence or absence of significant preoperative weakness, which was defined as a motor grade4 in any single upper extremity muscle group. Clinical notes were reviewed to determine affected muscle groups, rates of motor recovery, and risk factors for failure to improve.We identified 618 patients for inclusion. Significant preoperative upper extremity weakness was present in 27 patients (4.4%). Postoperatively, 19 of the affected patients (70.3%) experienced complete strength recovery, and 5 patients (18.5%) experienced an improvement in muscle strength to a motor grade ≥4. The rate of motor recovery postoperatively was 85.7% in the triceps, 83.3% in the finger flexors, 83.3% in the hand intrinsics, 50.0% in the biceps, and 25.0% in the deltoids. Risk factors for failure to experience significant motor improvement were the presence of myelomalacia (odds ratio: 28.9, P0.01) and the performance of2 levels of ACDF (odds ratio: 10.1, P0.01).Patients with substantial preoperative upper extremity weakness can expect high rates of motor recovery following ACDF, though patients with deltoid weakness, myelomalacia, and2 levels of ACDF are less likely to experience significant motor improvement.

Study Design Retrospective cohort study Objective Substantial variability in both the measurement and classification of subsidence limits the strength of conclusions that can be drawn from previous studies. The purpose of this study was to precisely characterize patterns of cervical cage subsidence utilizing computed tomography (CT) scans, determine risk factors for cervical cage subsidence, and investigate the impact of subsidence on pseudarthrosis rates. Methods We performed a retrospective review of patients who underwent one- to three-levels of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) utilizing titanium interbodies with anterior plating between the years 2018 and 2020. Subsidence measurements were performed by two independent reviewers on CT scans obtained 6 months postoperatively. Subsidence was then classified as mild if subsidence into the inferior and superior endplate were both ≤2 mm, moderate if the worst subsidence into the inferior or superior endplate was between 2 to 4 mm, or severe if the worst subsidence into the inferior or superior endplate was ≥4 mm. Results A total of 51 patients (100 levels) were included in this study. A total of 48 levels demonstrated mild subsidence (≤2 mm), 38 demonstrated moderate subsidence (2-4 mm), and 14 demonstrated severe subsidence (≥4 mm). Risk factors for severe subsidence included male gender, multilevel constructs, greater mean vertebral height loss, increased cage height, lower Taillard index, and lower screw tip to vertebral body height ratio. Severe subsidence was not associated with an increased rate of pseudarthrosis. Conclusion Following ACDF with titanium cervical cages, subsidence is an anticipated postoperative occurrence and is not associated with an increased risk of pseudarthrosis.

Simulation has become a widely accepted part of training and credentialing processes due to its ability to supplement technical skill acquisition outside of the operating room (OR). This project explores implementation of a bench-top simulation of open reduction with internal fixation (ORIF) as a cost-effective method for practicing and evaluating surgical skill.Participants ranging from intern to attending surgeon performed ORIF using a standard fixation set and a bovine or porcine tibia/radius model. Performance was recorded and scored by blinded reviewers based on a modified global rating scale (GRS), objective structured assessment of technical skills (OSATS) procedure-specific checklist, and critical-mistakes (CM) model. We calculated Fleiss' kappa for inter-rater reliability, Cronbach's alpha for internal consistency of scoring systems, and used univariate analysis to determine the ability of this model to discriminate between training levels. We also performed a normalized performance-versus-cost analysis to characterize perceived value of this simulation compared to other modalities.Twenty subjects completed the fracture fixation exercise. Fleiss' kappa for all scoring systems indicated substantial inter-rater agreement (k = 0.81, 0.80, and 0.74 for GRS, OSATS, and CM, respectively). Internal consistency reliability for GRS and OSATS were high with Cronbach's alpha 0.96(95%CI 0.94-0.97) and 0.94(95%CI 0.91-0.96), respectively. Using a Kuskal-Wallis rank sum test, GRS, OSATS, and CM were found effective for measuring differences between resident levels (p0.001, p0.001, and p = 0.002, respectively). Qualitative valuation of the exercise indicated similar value for education compared to time spent in the OR and surgical skills labs.This benchtop surgical simulation provides quantitative measurement of operative skills progression, increases trainee familiarity with ORIF principles, and permits targeted education by senior surgeons with the goal of training safe graduates. Procedure-specific checklist grading tools reliably differentiated between training levels with high internal validity. Implementing this model may decrease training costs and accelerate skill acquisition.

Study Design: Retrospective, single institution, multisurgeon case control series. Objective: To determine whether there are differences in reoperation rates or outcomes for patients undergoing 2-level posterolateral fusion (PLF) augmented by a transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) at only one of the levels or at both. Methods: A total of 416 patients were identified who underwent 2-level PLF with a TLIF at either one of those levels (n = 183) or at both (n = 233) with greater than 1-year follow-up. Demographic, surgical, radiographic, and clinical data was reviewed for each patient. These included age, sex, race, body mass index, smoking status, Charleston Comorbidity Index, operative time, estimated blood loss, length of stay, and patient-reported outcome measures. Results: Each cohort underwent 24 reoperations. Although the number of overall reoperations was not significantly different ( P > .05), among the reoperation types, there were significantly more reoperations for adjacent segment disease in the 2-level group compared to the 1-level group (19 vs 12, P = .04). There was no difference in reoperation for pseudarthrosis between the groups ( P > .05). Although both groups experienced significant improvements in Oswestry Disability Index ( P < .001) and Short Form–12 health questionnaire ( P < .001), there were no differences between improvements for 1- versus 2-level cohorts. Conclusions: For patients undergoing 2-level PLF in the setting of a TLIF, using a TLIF at one versus both levels does not seem to influence reoperation rates or outcomes. However, reoperation rates for adjacent segment disease are increased in the setting of a 2-level PLF augmented by a 2-level TLIF.

IntroductionTrauma, degenerative, pediatric, and neuromuscular deformities often require placement of implants into sacrum for construct stability. In these scenarios, fixation to the ilium is often added. To date, multiple studies have validated the correlation between Hounsfield units (HU) as measured on computed tomography and bone mineral density (BMD) on dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry to assess bone quality and fracture risk. We sought to map the BMD of the iliosacral region at the S1 and S2 levels using HU.Materials and MethodsPelvic CT scans of 100 patients were evaluated. HU measurements were taken from the anterior and posterior ilium, sacral ala, and sacral body using a best-fit circle encompassing a maximal amount of cancellous bone. Following the collection of all data points, an analysis of variance model was created to test the means and standard deviations of each anatomic region.ResultsThe highest mean BMD was found in the following locations (in descending order): S1 sacral body (279.72 HU, 95% confidence interval [CI], 261.75–297.69), S1 anterior ilium (254.45 HU, 95% CI, 236.64–272.27), S2 anterior ilium (229.88 HU, 95% CI, 211.39–248.36), and the S2 sacral body (191.58 HU, 95% CI, 173.31–209.85). Comparing the anterior ilium to the sacral ala, there was a higher BMD measurement at both the S1 level by 151.7 HU (p ConclusionsThe findings indicate that there is significantly higher BMD density of the anterior ilium and sacral body when compared to the sacral ala at both the S1 and S2 levels. In addition, the anterior ilium appears to provide more dense bone than the posterior ilium, as measured by mean HU.

STUDY DESIGN A retrospective cohort. OBJECTIVE The objective of this study to determine the correlation between Hounsfield unit (HU) measurements from the C4 vertebral body and dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) T-score. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA Recent attention has turned to the utilization of HU measurements from computed tomography (CT) as a potential screening method for low bone mineral density (BMD). We hypothesized that cervical spine CT HU measurements will correlate with BMD measurements conducted with DXA scans of the femoral neck. MATERIAL AND METHODS Patients with cervical CT and femoral neck DXA scans at 1 institution were included in the study. HUs were manually measured from the cancellous bone in the C4 vertebrae by 1 author blinded to DXA scans. HU measurements were compared with femoral neck DXA T-scores for the entire population. RESULTS A total of 149 patients with 149 cervical CT and femoral neck DXA scans were included in the study. The low BMD group (osteoporotic and osteopenic combined) showed a significant difference in HU compared with the normal groups within the study (P

Sarcopenia, defined as decreased skeletal muscle mass or function, has recently been found to have increased perioperative morbidity and mortality. The relationship between sarcopenia and clinical outcomes in patients undergoing lumbar fusion has not been examined. This study investigates whether sarcopenia affects fusion rates and outcomes following single-level lumbar decompression and fusion. A retrospective analysis was undertaken of 97 consecutive patients who underwent a single level lumbar fusion for degenerative spondylolisthesis. Demographics, perioperative data, and patient reported clinical outcomes were collected. Measurements of paraspinal muscle CSA were made using a standardized protocol at the level of the L3-4 disc space on a preoperative lumbar MRI. Univariate analysis was used to compare cohorts with regards to demographics, comorbidities, and clinical outcomes. Of 97 patients, 16 patients (15.8%) were in the sarcopenic cohort utilizing a threshold of 986.1 mm2/m2. Reoperation rates were not significantly different between the two groups (0% vs 3.6%, p = .451). The sarcopenia cohort had lower BMI (28.1 vs 31.8, p = .017) and less male patients (6.3% vs 55.6%, p

Study Design: Retrospective cohort review Objectives: Cervical pseudarthrosis is a frequent cause of need for revision anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) and may lead to worse patient-reported outcomes. The effect of proton pump inhibitors on cervical fusion rates are unknown. The purpose of this study was to determine if patients taking PPIs have higher rates of nonunion after ACDF. Methods: A retrospective cohort review was performed to compare patients who were taking PPIs preoperatively with those not taking PPIs prior to ACDF. Patients younger than 18 years of age, those with less than 1-year follow-up, and those undergoing surgery for trauma, tumor, infection, or revision were excluded. The rates of clinically diagnosed pseudarthrosis and radiographic pseudarthrosis were compared between PPI groups. Patient outcomes, pseudarthrosis rates, and revision rates were compared between PPI groups using either multiple linear or logistic regression analysis, controlling for demographic and operative variables. Results: Out of 264 patients, 58 patients were in the PPI group and 206 were in the non-PPI group. A total of 23 (8.71%) patients were clinically diagnosed with pseudarthrosis with a significant difference between PPI and non-PPI groups ( P = .009). Using multiple linear regression, PPI use was not found to significantly affect any patient-reported outcome measure. However, based on logistic regression, PPI use was found to increase the odds of clinically diagnosed pseudarthrosis (odds ratio 3.552, P = .014). Additionally, clinically diagnosed pseudarthrosis negatively influenced improvement in PCS-12 scores ( P = .022). Conclusions: PPI use was found to be a significant predictor of clinically diagnosed pseudarthrosis following ACDF surgery. Furthermore, clinically diagnosed pseudarthrosis negatively influenced improvement in PCS-12 scores.

The most popular approach to treating symptomatic cervical disk disease is anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. Although this procedure has significant long-term clinical success, it is associated with progressive adjacent segment degeneration with an annual incidence of ∼3%. Total disk arthroplasty was designed as an alternative to fusion that could preserve segmental motion at the operative level and potentially delay or prevent adjacent-level breakdown. The etiology of adjacent segment pathology (ASP) is multifactorial, and it is likely that most cases of ASP are unavoidable. When attempting to surgically prevent ASP, it is important to consider nonfusion alternatives, be judicious in one's level selection, and attempt to restore sagittal alignment. When ASP becomes a clinical problem, it is important to have an algorithm for how best to treat it.

Introduction Postoperative C5 nerve root palsy is a known complication after cervical surgery. The effect of increasing number of levels fused on the prevalence of C5 palsy after anterior cervical diskectomy and fusion (ACDF) is unclear. Methods Medical records of ACDF patients that included the C4-5 level at one institution were retrospectively reviewed. C5 palsy was defined as motor decline of the deltoid and/or biceps brachii muscle function by at least 1 level on standard manual muscle testing. Results A total of 196 patients met the inclusion criteria, with no significant differences noted between groups undergoing single- or multi-level ACDF. The overall C5 palsy rate was 5.1%. Palsy rates were not statistically significant based on the number of levels fused. Six of the 10 patients with C5 palsy had complete recovery of motor strength, whereas 2 patients had at least some level of strength recovery. Conclusion The overall C5 palsy rate was 5.1% for all patients undergoing up to four-level ACDF. The rate of postoperative motor decline was lowest in the patients undergoing two-level ACDF and highest in the single-level group, but this finding did not reach statistical significance. The prognosis for strength recovery by final follow-up is excellent. Level of evidence Level III, Case-control.

Objective To evaluate the impact of prematurity on fracture by age 5, controlling for medications and comorbidities of prematurity. Study design We performed a retrospective cohort study of infants born in Military Treatment Facilities in 2009-2010 with ≥5 years of follow-up care. Gestational age, low birth weight, comorbidities of prematurity (osteopenia, necrotizing enterocolitis, chronic lung disease, and cholestasis) and fractures were identified by International Classification of Disease, 9th Edition, codes. Pharmaceutical records identified treatment with caffeine, diuretics, postnatal corticosteroids, and antacids. Poisson regression analysis determined fracture rate by 5 years of life. Results There were 65 938 infants born in 2009-2010 who received care in the military health system for ≥5 years, including 3589 born preterm; 165 born at ≤286/7 weeks of gestation, 380 born at 29-316/7 weeks of gestation, and 3044 born at 32-366/7 weeks of gestation. Preterm birth at any gestational age was not associated with fracture rate in adjusted models. The fracture rate was increased with cholestasis, proton pump inhibitor exposure, and male sex. Conclusions Prematurity was not associated with fracture rate. Neonatal cholestasis and proton pump inhibitor treatment were associated with increased fractures by age 5.

The aim of this study is to identify risk factors associated with postoperative DJF in long constructs for ASD.A retrospective review was performed at a tertiary referral spine centre from 01/01/2007 to 31/12/2016. Demographic, clinical and radiographic parameters were collated for patients with DJF in the postoperative period and compared to those without DJF. Survival analyses were performed using univariate logistic regression to identify variables with a p value 0.05 for inclusion in multivariate analysis. Spearman's correlations were performed where applicable.One hundred two patients were identified. 41 (40.2%) suffered DJF in the postoperative period, with rod fracture being the most common sign of DJF (13/65; 20.0%). Mean time to failure was 32.4 months. On univariate analysis, pedicle subtraction osteotomy (p = 0.03), transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (p 0.001), pre-op LL (p 0.01), pre-op SVA (p 0.01), pre-op SS (p = 0.02), postop LL (p = 0.03), postop SVA (p = 0.01), postop PI/LL (p 0.001), LL correction (p 0.001), SVA correction (p 0.001), PT correction (p = 0.03), PI/LL correction (p 0.001), SS correction (p = 0.03) all proved significant. On multivariate analysis, pedicle subtraction osteotomy (OR 27.3; p = 0.03), postop SVA (p 0.01) and LL correction (p = 0.02) remained statistically significant as independent risk factors for DJF.Recently, DJF has received recognition as its own entity due to a notable postoperative incidence. Few studies to date have evaluated risk factors for DJF. The results of our study highlight that pedicle subtraction osteotomy, poor correction of lumbar lordosis, and sagittal vertical axis are significantly associated with postoperative occurrence of DJF.

Background: Postoperative C5 palsy is a common complication following cervical decompression, occurring more frequently after posterior-based procedures. It has been theorized that this is the result of C5 nerve stretch resulting from spinal cord drift with these procedures. As such, it is thought to be less common after anterior cervical decompression and fusion (ACDF). However, no consensus has been reached on its true etiology. The purpose of this study is to assess the rate of C5 palsy following ACDF and to determine whether any radiographic or demographic parameters were predictive of its development. Methods: Two hundred and twenty-six patients who received ACDF between September 2015 and September 2016 were reviewed, and 122 were included in the final analysis. Patient demographic, surgical, and radiographic data were analyzed, including preoperative and postoperative radiographic and motor examination results. The Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare continuous variables between independent groups, and Fisher9s exact test was used to compare categorical variables between groups. Results: Seven patients developed a C5 palsy in the postoperative period, an incidence rate of 5.7%. Among the radiographic parameters evaluated, there were no statistically significant differences between the C5 palsy and nonpalsy groups. Additionally, there were no statistically significant differences in age, patient sex, or numbers of vertebral levels fused between groups. Conclusions: Ultimately, we did not identify any statistically significant demographic or radiographic predictive factors for the development of C5 palsy following ACDF surgery. Level of Evidence: 3.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT Posterior cervical fusion (PCF) is successfully used to treat cervical spondylotic myelopathy, multilevel cervical stenosis, and cervical deformity. However, limited evidence exists regarding the appropriate level of proximal and distal extension of PCF constructs. Further investigation is required to understand the effects of construct endpoint on fusion rate, junctional failure, and sagittal deformity correction. PURPOSE To compare the surgical and radiographic outcomes of patients undergoing posterior cervical fusion (PCF) with constructs extending from C2-T2 to patients with constructs extending from C3-T1. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING This was a multicenter retrospective review of two prospective cohorts of patients undergoing PCF from C2-T2 or C3-T1 for subaxial cervical stenosis at two academic institutions from 2012 to 2020. PATIENT SAMPLE We identified 106 patients for inclusion in the C2-T2 cohort and 49 patients for inclusion in the C3-T1 cohort. OUTCOME MEASURES Pre- and postoperative cervical alignment parameters, distal screw loosening, distal junctional failure, and pseudarthrosis were measured. Methods Cervical alignment parameters were measured on both preoperative and postoperative radiographs performed greater than 6 months postoperatively. The cohorts were compared based on preoperative cervical alignment, postoperative cervical alignment, and change in cervical alignment. Postoperative radiographs were also assessed for signs of distal screw loosening, distal junctional failure, and pseudarthrosis. We utilized Student's t-test to compare all means between groups with p Results A total of 155 patients were included in the study (C2-T2: 106 patients, C3-T1: 49 patients). There were no significant differences in demographics or preoperative symptoms between cohorts. Fusion rates were significantly higher in the C2-T2 (93%) than the C3-T1 (80%, p=0.040) cohort. When comparing the C2-T2 to the C3-T1 cohort, the C3-T1 cohort had a significantly greater rate of proximal junctional failure (2% vs 10%, p=0.006), distal junctional failure (1% vs 20%, p Conclusions In patients undergoing PCF, a C2-T2 construct demonstrated lower rates of pseudarthrosis, DJF, PJF, and compensatory upper cervical hyperextension compared to a C3-T1 construct. FDA DEVICE/DRUG STATUS This abstract does not discuss or include any applicable devices or drugs.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT Studies in the lumbar spine suggest a correlation between sarcopenia and worse patient outcomes. To our knowledge, no studies have investigated whether an association exists between fatty degeneration of the cervical paraspinal musculature and cervical disability in the perioperative period. PURPOSE The purpose of this study is to determine whether paraspinal Goutalier grade of fat degeneration is associated with patient-reported outcomes in patients undergoing ACDF. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING Retrospective review of a prospectively collected cohort of patients who underwent 1 to 3 level ACDF between the years 2011-2014 at a single academic medical center. PATIENT SAMPLE Sixty-nine patients who underwent 1-3 level ACDF between the years of 2011-2014. OUTCOME MEASURES Goutalier classification, patient-reported outcomes such as neck disability index (NDI), RAND score, and EQ-5D score were measured. METHODS We performed a retrospective review of a prospective cohort of patients undergoing 1 to 3 level ACDF at a single institution between the years 2011-2014. We utilized preoperative MRI's to classify patients into Goutalier grades. Patient-reported outcomes including NDI, RAND score and EQ-5D score were collected and analyzed according to patients’ Goutalier grade. We utilized Student's t-test and ANOVA to compare all means between groups. The mid-P exact test was used to compare proportional differences between groups. RESULTS We identified 69 patients for inclusion. The cohort was 47.3% male. 29 patients were classified as Goutalier 0-1 (Group 1), 29 were Goutalier 1.5-2 (Group 2), and 11 were Goutalier 2.5-4.0 (Group 3). Determination of Goutalier grade by the two reviewers resulted in 82.8% agreement with correlation coefficient of 0.69 (Pearson, r2), demonstrating moderate interrater reliability. All Goutalier groups experienced significant improvement in all three outcome scores. Average postoperative NDI scores were 25.3 in Group 1, 13.9 in Group 2, and 25.1 in Group 3 (p=0.02). The percentage of patients in each group reporting worse disability after surgery was 17.2%, 3.3% and 9.1%, respectively (p=0.05) No statistically significant difference was seen between groups in postoperative EQ-5D (p=0.07) or RAND scores (p>0.05). CONCLUSIONS The present study is the first to assess the association between cervical paraspinal muscle Goutalier grade and patient reported outcomes following ACDF. Based upon our study, patients with worse cervical paraspinal degeneration may benefit from improved symptom relief in comparison to patients with a lesser degree of degeneration undergoing ACDF. FDA DEVICE/DRUG STATUS This abstract does not discuss or include any applicable devices or drugs.

BACKGROUND The preoperative identification of osteoporosis in the spine surgery population is of crucial importance. Limitations associated with dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry, such as access and reliability, have prompted the search for alternative methods to diagnose osteoporosis. The Hounsfield Unit(HU), a readily available measure on computed tomography, has garnered considerable attention in recent years as a potential diagnostic tool for reduced bone mineral density. However, the optimal threshold settings for diagnosing osteoporosis have yet to be determined. METHODS We selected studies that included comparison of the HU(index test) with dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry evaluation(reference test). Data quality was assessed using the standardised QUADAS-2 criteria. Studies were characterised into 3 categories, based on the threshold of the index test used with the goal of obtaining a high sensitivity, high specificity or balanced sensitivity-specificity test. RESULTS 9 studies were eligible for meta-analysis. In the high specificity group, the pooled sensitivity was 0.652 (95% CI 0.526 – 0.760), specificity 0.795 (95% CI 0.711 – 0.859) and diagnostic odds ratio was 6.652 (95% CI 4.367 – 10.133). In the high sensitivity group, the overall pooled sensitivity was 0.912 (95% CI 0.718 – 0.977), specificity was 0.67 (0.57 – 0.75) and diagnostic odds ratio was 19.424 (5.446 – 69.275). In the balanced sensitivity-specificity group, the overall pooled sensitivity was 0.625 (95% CI 0.504 – 0.732), specificity was 0.914 (0.823 – 0.960) and diagnostic odds ratio was 14.880 (7.521 – 29.440). Considerable heterogeneity existed throughout the analysis. CONCLUSION In conclusion, the HU is a clinically useful tool to aide in the diagnosis of osteoporosis. However, the heterogeneity seen in this study warrants caution in the interpretation of results. We have demonstrated the impact of differing HU threshold values on the diagnostic ability of this test. We would propose a threshold of 135 HU to diagnose OP. Future work would investigate the optimal HU cut-off to differentiate normal from low bone mineral density.

Study design This was a narrative review. Objective This review discusses our current knowledge regarding cellular-based allografts while highlighting the key gaps in the literature that must be addressed before their widespread adoption. Summary of background data Iliac crest bone graft is the gold-standard bone graft material but is associated with donor site morbidity. Commonly utilized bone graft extenders such as demineralized bone matrix and bone morphogenetic protein have conflicting data supporting their efficacy and lack the osteogenic potential of new cellular-based allograft options. Methods An extensive literature review was performed. The literature was then summarized in accordance with the authors' clinical experience. Results There is not widespread evidence thus far that the addition of the osteogenic cellular component to allograft enhances spinal fusion, as a recent study by Bhamb and colleagues demonstrated superior bone formation during spine fusion in an aythmic rat model when demineralized bone matrix was used in comparison to Osteocel Plus. Furthermore, the postimplantation cellular viability and osteogenic and osteoinductive capacity of cellular-based allografts need to be definitively established, especially given that a recent study by Lina and colleagues demonstrated a paucity of bone marrow cell survival in an immunocompetent mouse posterolateral spinal fusion model. Conclusions This data indicates that the substantially increased cost of these cellular allografts may not be justified. Level of evidence Level V.

To curb the unsustainable rise in health care costs, novel payment models are being explored which focus on value rather than volume. Underlying this reform is an accurate understanding of costs and outcomes. The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, the Institute of Medicine, and the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality have specifically advocated for the use of registries to help define the real-world effectiveness of surgical interventions to help guide health care reform. Registries can help define value by documenting surgical efficacy, and specifically by reporting patient-based outcome measures. Over the past 10 years, several spine registries have been initiated and some others have expanded. These are providing a repository of evidence for surgical value. Herein, we will review the components of a well-designed registry and provide examples of such registries and their impact on health care delivery.

Surgical site infection (SSI) following spine surgery can be devastating for both the patient and the surgeon. It leads to significant morbidity and associated health care costs, from readmissions, reoperations, and subsequent poor clinical outcomes. Complications associated with SSI following spine surgery include pseudarthrosis, neurological deterioration, sepsis, and death. Its management can be very challenging. The diagnosis of SSI involves the interpretation of combined clinical, laboratory, and occasionally radiologic findings. Most infections can be treated with an appropriate course of antibiotics and bracing if required. Surgical intervention is usually reserved for infections resistant to medical management, the need for open biopsy/culture, evolving spinal instability or deformity, and neurologic deficit or deterioration. A thorough knowledge of associated risk factors is required and patients should be stratified for risk preoperatively. The multifaceted approach of risk stratification, early diagnosis and effective treatment, is essential for successful prevention and effective treatment and crucial for a satisfactory outcome.

Background To determine the incidence and risk factors for adverse cardiac events after lumbar spine fusion. Methods A total of 50 495 patients were identified through the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database who underwent lumbar spine fusion between 2005 and 2015. The 30-day postoperative data were analyzed to assess for the incidence of adverse cardiac events including cardiac arrest or myocardial infarction. Of those who experienced an event, patient- and surgery-specific parameters were evaluated to assess for risk factors. Results A total of 240 cardiac events occurred in the studied cohort (4.76 events/1000 patients). Factors that were associated with an increased cardiac risk were age (odds ratio [OR] = 1.039, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.03, 1.05, P P = .001), insulin-dependent diabetes (OR = 1.83, 95% CI = 1.29, 2.6, P = .001), American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score >3 (OR = 1.92, 95% CI = 1.00, 3.65, P = .048), absolute hematocrit different from 45 (OR = 1.07, 95% CI = 1.04, 1.10, P P = .04). The impact of sustaining a cardiac event in the setting of single-level lumbar fusion is catastrophic as the 30-day postoperative mortality rate for those sustaining an event was 24.6% (59/240 patients), compared to 0.2% (87/50 255) for those not sustaining an event ( P < .001). Conclusions Cardiac events after lumbar fusion are a rare but devastating series of complications. Several risk factors were identified, including insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus, smoking, advanced age, male sex, ASA score of >3, and anemia/polycythemia. Considering the severity of these consequences, appropriate risk stratification is imperative, and optimization of modifiable risk factors may mitigate this risk.