Search

Further understanding of when to initiate therapies in pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is important to improve long-term outcomes.Post hocanalyses of GRIPHON (NCT01106014) and exploratory analyses of TRITON (NCT02558231) suggested benefit of early selexipag initiation on long-term outcomes, despite no additional benefitversusinitial double combination on haemodynamic and functional parameters in TRITON.Post hocanalyses investigated the effect of early selexipag initiation on disease progression and survival in a large, pooled PAH cohort. Data from newly diagnosed (≤6 months) PAH patients from GRIPHON and TRITON were pooled. Patients on active therapy with selexipag (pooled selexipag group) were compared with those on control therapy with placebo (pooled control group). Disease progression end-points were defined as per the individual studies. Hazard ratios (HR) and 95% CI for time to first disease progression event up to end of double-blind treatment (selexipag/placebo) +7 days and time to all-cause death up to end of study were estimated using Cox regression models. The pooled dataset comprised 649 patients, with 44% on double background therapy. Selexipag reduced the risk of disease progression by 52%versuscontrol (HR: 0.48; 95% CI: 0.35–0.66). HR for risk of all-cause death was 0.70 (95% CI: 0.46–1.10) for the pooled selexipagversuscontrol group. Sensitivity analyses accounting for the impact of PAH background therapy showed consistent results, confirming the appropriateness of data pooling. Thesepost hoc, pooled analyses build on previous insights, further supporting selexipag use within 6 months of diagnosis, including as part of triple therapy, to delay disease progression.

Hypercoagulability and endothelial dysfunction are hallmarks of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and appear to predict disease severity. A high incidence of thrombosis despite thromboprophylaxis is reported in patients with moderate to severe COVID-19. Recent randomized clinical trials suggest that therapeutic-intensity heparin confers a survival benefit in moderate-severity COVID-19 compared to standard-intensity heparin, potentially by harnessing heparin-mediated endothelial-stabilizing and anti-inflammatory effects.We hypothesized that patients with moderate-severity COVID-19 exhibit enhanced hypercoagulability despite standard-intensity thromboprophylaxis with low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) compared to non-COVID-19 hospitalized patients.Patients with moderate COVID-19 and a control group (severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 [SARS-CoV-2]-negative hospitalized patients) receiving LMWH thromboprophylaxis were recruited. Markers of endothelial damage and plasma thrombin generation parameters were assessed.Tissue plasminogen activator levels were significantly increased in the COVID-19 group (8.3 ± 4.4 vs. 4.9 ± 2.4 ng/ml; P = .02) compared to non-COVID-19-hospitalized patients. Despite thromboprophylaxis, mean endogenous thrombin potential was significantly increased among COVID-19 patients (1929 ± 448 vs. 1528 ± 460.8 nM*min; P = .04) but lag time to thrombin generation was significantly prolonged (8.1 ± 1.8 vs. 6.2 ± 1.8 mins; P = .02). While tissue factor pathway inhibitor (TFPI) levels were similar in both groups, in the presence of an inhibitory anti-TFPI antibody, the difference in lag time between the groups was abrogated.Collectively, these data demonstrate that COVID-19 of moderate severity is associated with increased plasma thrombin generation and endothelial damage, and that hypercoagulability persists despite standard LMWH thromboprophylaxis. These findings may be of clinical interest given recent clinical trial data which suggest escalated heparin dosing in non-severe COVID-19 may be associated with improved clinical outcomes.

Introduction In the event-driven GRIPHON randomised-controlled trial, the oral prostacyclin receptor agonist selexipag significantly reduced the risk of disease progression (composite primary endpoint of morbidity/mortality), compared with placebo, in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). The ongoing open-label extension study (GRIPHON OL) collects further data on long-term safety, tolerability, and survival of PAH patients treated with selexipag. Methods Patients randomised to selexipag or placebo in GRIPHON could enter GRIPHON OL either after experiencing a morbidity event during double-blind treatment or at the end of the study. Patients were followed for adverse events (AE) and survival from selexipag initiation up to 3 days and 30 days after end of treatment, respectively. Data are presented up to a cut-off date of 1 September 2019. Results Overall, 953 patients in GRIPHON and GRIPHON OL were treated with selexipag. At the time of selexipag initiation, 81.2% of patients were receiving background PAH therapy. Median (min, max) exposure to selexipag was 31.7 months (0, 106), corresponding to a total of 3054.4 patient-years. The most frequently reported AEs were related to known prostacyclin-related effects or underlying disease. There were 305 (32.0%) patients who experienced an AE leading to treatment discontinuation. Survival during GRIPHON and GRIPHON OL was assessed for the 574 patients randomised to selexipag in GRIPHON. Kaplan–Meier survival estimates (95%CI) at 1, 3, 5 and 7 years were 92.0% (89.4, 94.0), 79.3% (75.4, 82.6), 71.2% (66.5, 75.3) and 63.0% (57.4, 68.1), respectively. Conclusions These results provide the longest follow-up period published to date for a PAH therapy. The safety profile of selexipag over this extended treatment period was consistent with that observed in GRIPHON. A large proportion of the population was receiving background therapy at selexipag initiation, providing further insight into the long-term safety of selexipag as part of a combination therapy regimen. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifiers: NCT01106014 and NCT01112306 Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12325-021-01898-1.

Background Early initiation of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) therapies is associated with improved long-term outcomes, yet data on the early use of prostacyclin pathway agents are limited. In these post hoc analyses of the Prostacyclin (PGI2) Receptor Agonist In Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension (GRIPHON) study, the largest randomized controlled trial for PAH to date, the prognostic value of time from diagnosis and its impact on treatment response were examined. Research Question How does time from diagnosis impact morbidity/mortality events and response to selexipag treatment in patients with PAH? Study Design and Methods The GRIPHON study randomly assigned 1,156 patients with PAH to selexipag or placebo treatment. Patients were categorized post hoc into a time from diagnosis of ≤ 6 months and > 6 months at randomization. Hazard ratios (selexipag vs placebo) were calculated for the primary end point of morbidity/mortality by time from diagnosis using Cox proportional hazard models. Results Time from diagnosis was ≤ 6 months in 34.9% and > 6 months in 65.1% of patients. Time from diagnosis was prognostic of morbidity/mortality, with newly diagnosed patients having a poorer long-term outcome than patients diagnosed for longer. Compared with placebo, selexipag reduced the risk of morbidity/mortality in patients with a time from diagnosis of ≤ 6 months and > 6 months, with a more pronounced effect in newly diagnosed patients (hazard ratio, 0.45 [95% CI, 0.33-0.63] and 0.74 [95% CI, 0.57-0.96], respectively; P = .0219 for interaction). Interpretation In the GRIPHON study, newly diagnosed PAH patients had a worse prognosis than patients with a longer time from diagnosis. The benefit of selexipag treatment on disease progression was more pronounced in patients treated earlier than in patients treated later. Trial Registry ClinicalTrials.gov ; No.: NCT01106014; URL: www.clinicaltrials.gov

AIM: To report an audit of the evaluation of suspected, unconfirmed cases of COVID-19 including chest computed tomography (CT), as compared to World Health Organization recommendations. METHODS: A clinical audit was undertaken examining the evaluation of patients with suspected COVID-19 with negative SARS-CoV-2 reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) results, with comparison to WHO recommendations. A retrospective chart review was undertaken for 90 patients examining investigations, in particular CT, used to clarify the diagnosis. RESULTS: Ninety patients underwent additional investigation. Seventy-five per cent adherence to WHO recommendations was observed. Fifty-two men (57.78%) and 38 (42.22%) women were investigated, with a median age of 69 years (range 20-96 years). Seventy-nine chest CT examinations demonstrated positive, indeterminate, and negative rates for COVID-19 of 3.79%, 24.1%, and 72.15% respectively. Three patients had discordant swab results with initially negative and subsequently positive results for SARS-CoV-2, resulting in false-negative rates of 5.1% for those retested. Combining discordant RT-PCR swab results, positive radiology, and patients treated as COVID-19-positive due to indeterminate radiology and highly consistent symptoms, resulted in a false-negative rate for initial SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR swabs of 16.67%. CONCLUSION: Seventy-five per cent compliance with relevant WHO guidance and a false-negative rate for initial swabs of 16.67% was demonstrated. Further evidence is needed to fully determine the utility of chest CT in the diagnosis of COVID-19 in the context of initial false-negative RT-PCR results.

BACKGROUND: Approaches to risk assessment in pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) include the noninvasive French risk assessment approach (number of low-risk criteria based on the European Society of Cardiology and European Respiratory Society guidelines) and Registry to Evaluate Early and Long-term PAH Disease Management (REVEAL) 2.0 risk calculator. The prognostic and predictive value of these methods for morbidity/mortality was evaluated in the predominantly prevalent population of GRIPHON, the largest randomized controlled trial in PAH. METHODS: GRIPHON randomized 1,156 patients with PAH to selexipag or placebo. Post-hoc analyses were performed on the primary composite end-point of morbidity/mortality by the number of low-risk criteria (World Health Organization functional class I-II; 6-minute walk distance >440 m; N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide

Selexipag is an oral selective prostacyclin receptor agonist, that was approved for use in patients with NYHA functional class II-III pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). In the GRIPHON study, selexipag demonstrated consistent efficacy for individualised doses in low, medium and high dose stratums. In order to better understand the real world approach to selexipag titration and to establish the individualised maintenance regimens used in our centre, we performed this retrospective study of the first 20 patients prescribed selexipag. Baseline characteristics differed from the GRIPHON study, with more combination therapy and comorbidities at baseline; however. Maintenance doses were stratified as low-dose in 10% (n=2), medium-dose in 70% (n=14) and high-dose in 20% (n=4). Furthermore, two of these patients were successfully transitioned from inhaled iloprost. This study demonstrates that selexipag can be safely initiated, titrated and transitioned in an outpatient setting to achieve an individualised dosing regimen.

BackgroundInflammation and dysregulated immunity are important in the development of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). Compelling preclinical data supports the therapeutic blockade of interleukin-6 (IL-6) signalling.MethodsWe conducted a phase 2 open-label study of intravenous tocilizumab (8 mg·kg−1) over 6 months in patients with group 1 PAH. Co-primary end-points were safety, defined by incidence and severity of adverse events, and change in pulmonary vascular resistance. Separately, a mendelian randomisation study was undertaken on 11 744 individuals with European ancestry including 2085 patients with idiopathic/heritable disease for the IL-6 receptor (IL6R) variant (rs7529229), known to associate with circulating IL-6R levels.ResultsWe recruited 29 patients (male/female 10/19; mean±sd age 54.9±11.4 years). Of these, 19 had heritable/idiopathic PAH and 10 had connective tissue disease-associated PAH. Six were withdrawn prior to drug administration; 23 patients received at least one dose of tocilizumab. Tocilizumab was discontinued in four patients owing to serious adverse events. There were no deaths. Despite evidence of target engagement in plasma IL-6 and C-reactive protein levels, both intention-to-treat and modified intention-to-treat analyses demonstrated no change in pulmonary vascular resistance. Inflammatory markers did not predict treatment response. Mendelian randomisation did not support an effect of the lead IL6R variant on risk of PAH (OR 0.99, p=0.88).ConclusionAdverse events were consistent with the known safety profile of tocilizumab. Tocilizumab did not show any consistent treatment effect.

Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is a prevalent disease of the pulmonary vasculature that is characterised by considerable morbidity and mortality. Substantial efforts have been made in recent years to improve disease recognition, diagnosis and management, and this is reflected in current guidelines. The haemodynamic definition of PH has been revised and a definition for exercise PH has been provided. Risk stratification has been refined and the importance of comorbidities and phenotyping have been highlighted. These changes provide an opportunity to potentially identify pulmonary vascular disease at an earlier stage and to enhance patient-centred, goal-orientated treatment decisions. A promising fourth treatment pathway for pulmonary arterial hypertension and potential targeted therapies for group 3 PH are on the horizon, concepts which seemed inconceivable only a few years ago. Beyond medication, there is a greater appreciation for the importance of supervised training in stable PH and the possible role of interventional therapies in select cases. The landscape of PH is changing and it is characterised by progress, innovation and opportunities. In this article, we highlight some of the new trends in PH, with a specific focus on the revised European Society of Cardiology/European Respiratory Society 2022 guidelines for the diagnosis and management of PH.

AIMS: The number of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) patients with comorbidities is increasing and there are limited data on response to PAH-targeted therapies in this population. These post hoc analyses explored the effect of selexipag in PAH patients with cardiovascular comorbidities in the GRIPHON study. METHODS AND RESULTS: Randomized patients (n=1156) were classified using three methods: (i) by subgroups defined according to previously published comorbidity count and restrictive haemodynamic criteria: Subgroup A (

Pulmonary hypertension is a progressive cardiorespiratory disease that is characterized by considerable morbidity and mortality. While physical activity can improve symptoms and quality of life, engagement in this population is suboptimal. The aim of this study was to explore attitudes towards exercise and the dimensions that influence physical activity participation in individuals with pulmonary hypertension. Virtual, semi-structured interviews were conducted with individuals, with a formal diagnosis of pulmonary hypertension. Participants were recruited through the Pulmonary Hypertension Association of Ireland. Interviews were transcribed and analysed using thematic analysis. Nineteen patients were interviewed (n = 19). There was a female preponderance (n = 13) and the mean age was 50 ± 12 years. Three themes were identified and included fear, perceived value of exercise and environmental factors. Fear was the primary theme and included three sub-themes of fear of (i) over-exertion, (ii) physical damage and (iii) breathlessness. The perceived value of exercise encompassed two distinct sub-themes of perceived (i) exercise importance and (ii) benefits of exercise. Environmental factors included the terrain, weather conditions and location. Fear of overexertion, harm and dyspnoea strongly influenced attitudes to and engagement in physical activity. This study revealed heterogenous patient perspectives regarding the importance of physical activity and exercise. Future interventions that mitigate fear and promote the value of physical activity for individuals with pulmonary hypertension may have considerable benefits in promoting physical activity engagement. Such interventions require multidisciplinary involvement, including specialised pulmonary hypertension clinicians and exercise and behaviour change specialists.

Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) is a rare and under-recognised complication of acute pulmonary embolism. Information regarding the characteristics of CTEPH in Ireland is limited, and the aim of this retrospective cohort study was to address this knowledge gap. Seventy-two cases of CTEPH were diagnosed in the National Pulmonary Hypertension Unit (NPHU) in Ireland between 2010 and 2020. This accounted for 6% of all referrals to the unit and translates to an estimated annual incidence of 1.39 per million population (95% confidence interval, 0.33-2.46). The prevalence of diagnosed CTEPH in Ireland in 2020 was estimated at 12.05 per million population (95% CI 9.00-15.10). The average duration of symptoms prior to CTEPH diagnosis was 23 (±22) months. Patients with CTEPH were more likely to be male (n = 40, 56%), older (60 ± 17 years) and have identifiable risk factors for CTEPH (n = 61, 85%) at diagnosis. Regarding treatment, pulmonary hypertension (PH) vasodilator therapy was prescribed in 75% (n = 54) within 12 months of diagnosis, inferior vena cava filters were placed in 24% (n = 17) and 97% (n = 70) of cases were anticoagulated. Pulmonary endarterectomy was performed in 35% (n = 25), balloon pulmonary angioplasty in 6% (n = 4). One-, three- and five-year survival was 93%, 80% and 65% from the time of diagnosis, and this was significantly better in patients who underwent pulmonary endarterectomy (p = 0.01). This is the first study describing the characteristics of CTEPH in Ireland and highlights suboptimal disease recognition and referral for the assessment for pulmonary endarterectomy.

A 58-year-old man presented to the emergency department with recent-onset palpitations and progressive exertional dyspnoea. ECG demonstrated new-onset atrial fibrillation. Transthoracic echocardiogram showed global impairment in left ventricular systolic function with left ventricular ejection fraction of 20%. Cardiac MRI (CMRI) demonstrated generalised severe myocarditis. A SARS-CoV-2 PCR was positive for SARS-CoV-2 RNA. As such, we diagnosed our patient with COVID-19-associated myocarditis based on CMRI appearances and positive SARS-CoV-2 swab. This case highlights that COVID-19-associated myocarditis can present as new atrial fibrillation and heart failure without the classic COVID-19-associated symptoms.

Pulmonary arterial hypertension is a rare disease of the pulmonary vasculature, characterised pathologically by proliferation, remodelling and thrombosis in situ . Unfortunately, existing therapeutic interventions do not reverse these findings and the disease continues to result in significant morbidity and premature mortality. A number of haematological derangements have been described in pulmonary arterial hypertension which may provide insights into the pathobiology of the disease and opportunities to explore new therapeutic pathways. These include quantitative and qualitative platelet abnormalities, such as thrombocytopaenia, increased mean platelet volume and altered platelet bioenergetics. Furthermore, a hypercoagulable state and aberrant negative regulatory pathways can be observed, which could contribute to thrombosis in situ in distal pulmonary arteries and arterioles. Finally, there is increasing interest in the role of extracellular vesicle autocrine and paracrine signalling in pulmonary arterial hypertension, and their potential utility as biomarkers and novel therapeutic targets. This review focuses on the potential role of platelets, extracellular vesicles and coagulation pathways in the pathobiology of pulmonary arterial hypertension. We highlight important unanswered clinical questions and the implications of these observations for future research and pulmonary arterial hypertension-directed therapies.

A 25-year old man was admitted to hospital with a 12-month history of progressive dyspnoea and fatigue, with an acute deterioration over the preceding 2 weeks. He denied any significant past medical history, was a lifelong non-smoker and had moved to Ireland from Brazil with his family 1 year prior. On presentation, he was hypoxic, with peripheral oxygen saturations of 79% on room air and tachycardic at 110 beats·min−1. Examination revealed a loud pulmonary component of the second heart sound, but was otherwise unremarkable, as he was clinically euvolaemic, with clear lung fields and there were no audible cardiac murmurs. Chest radiograph demonstrated prominent hilar vasculature (figure 1)., Mediastinal adenopathy, septal line thickening, centrilobular ground glass opacities on CT and a markedly reduced TLCO in a young patient with pulmonary hypertension, should alert the clinician to this potential diagnosis https://bit.ly/3cfe9pX

Objective: The soluble guanylate cyclase stimulator riociguat is approved for the treatment of adult patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) and inoperable or persistent/recurrent chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) following Phase 3 randomized trials. The EXPosurE Registry RiociguaT in patients with pulmonary hypertension (EXPERT) study was designed to monitor the long-term safety of riociguat in clinical practice. Methods: EXPERT was an international, multicenter, prospective, uncontrolled, non-interventional cohort study of patients treated with riociguat. Patients were followed for at least 1 year and up to 4 years from enrollment or until 30 days after stopping riociguat treatment. Primary safety outcomes were adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) coded using Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities preferred terms and System Organ Classes version 21.0, collected during routine clinic visits and collated via case report forms. Results: In total, 956 patients with CTEPH were included in the analysis. The most common AEs in these patients were peripheral edema/edema (11.7%), dizziness (7.5%), right ventricular (RV)/cardiac failure (7.7%), and pneumonia (5.0%). The most common SAEs were RV/cardiac failure (7.4%), pneumonia (4.1%), dyspnea (3.6%), and syncope (2.5%). Exposure-adjusted rates of hemoptysis/pulmonary hemorrhage and hypotension were low and comparable to those in the long-term extension study of riociguat (Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension Soluble Guanylate Cyclase–Stimulator Trial [CHEST-2]). Conclusion: Data from EXPERT show that in patients with CTEPH, the safety of riociguat in routine practice was consistent with the known safety profile of the drug, and no new safety concerns were identified. © 2020 The Authors Eli Lilly and Company; Pfizer; Bayer; GlaxoSmithKline; Merck; Actelion Pharmaceuticals; Meso Scale Diagnostics; United Therapeutics Corporation; Novartis Pharma; Merck Sharp and Dohme; GlaxoSmithKline Australia; Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft; Grupo Ferrer Internacional, S.A The EXPERT registry was funded by Bayer AG (Berlin, Germany) and Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., a subsidiary of Merck & Co. Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA. The authors acknowledge the database administration by Torsten Tille, Dresden, and the project administration of Mrs Romy Hoppenz and Mrs Linda Kottke at GWT-TUD GmbH, Dresden. Medical writing services provided by Richard Murphy PhD of Adelphi Communications Ltd, Macclesfield, UK were funded by Bayer AG in accordance with Good Publication Practice (GPP3) guidelines. The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Prof Marius M. Hoeper reports personal fees from Bayer AG, during the conduct of the study; personal fees from Actelion, personal fees from Acceleron, personal fees from MSD, personal fees from Jansen, personal fees from Pfizer, outside the submitted work. Dr Hans Klose reports speaker and consultancy fees from Actelion, Bayer AG, GSK, Novartis, Pfizer, and United Therapeutics and research support from Actelion, Bayer AG, GSK, Pfizer, and MSD. Dr Michael Halank reports personal fees and non-financial support from Actelion, AstraZeneca, Bayer AG, Berlin-Chemie, GSK, OMT, MSD, and Novartis. Dr George Giannakoulas reports speaker and consultancy fees from Actelion, Bayer, ELPEN Pharmaceuticals, GSK, Pfizer, Lilly, and United Therapeutics, and research support from GSK, ELPEN Pharmaceuticals, and Galenica. Dr Henning Gall has received honoraria and/or other support from Actelion, AstraZeneca, Bayer, BMS, GSK, Janssen-Cilag, Lilly, MSD, Novartis, OMT, Pfizer, and United Therapeutics. Dr Pavel Jansa reports consultancy and speaker fees from MSD, AOP Orphan, and Actelion. Prof Ekkehard Grünig reports research grants and speaker honoraria/consultancy fees from Actelion and Bayer/MSD, research grants from GSK, United Therapeutics, Bellerophon, OMT GmbH, Pfizer, Reata, and Novartis, and speaker honoraria from Bial, Medscape, and OrPha Swiss GmbH. Prof David Pittrow reports personal fees from Actelion, Bayer AG, Aspen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Sanofi, Biogen, Shire, and MSD outside the submitted work. Silvia Ulrich reports research grants and personal fees from Actelion, Bayer, MSD, and Orpha Swiss. Tobias J. Lange has received personal fees from Actelion, MSD, Pfizer, and OMT orphan. Dr Iraklis Tsangaris reports speaker and consultancy fees from Actelion, Bayer AG, ELPEN, GSK, MSD, Pfizer, and United Therapeutics. Stephan Rosenkranz reports remunerations for lectures and/or consultancy from Abbott, Actelion, Arena, Bayer, Ferrer, GSK, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, and United Therapeutics; and research support to his institution from Actelion, Bayer, Novartis, Pfizer, and United Therapeutics. Repke J. Snijder reports grants from Pfizer and Actelion Pharmaceuticals. Prof Iveta Šimková reports consultancy and speaker fees from MSD, AOP Orphan, and Actelion. Dr Marc Humbert reports grants and personal fees from Bayer and GSK, and personal fees from Actelion, Merck, and United Therapeutics. Marion Delcroix has received investigator, speaker, consultant, and steering committee member fees from Actelion, Bayer AG, Bellerophon, Eli Lilly, GlaxoSmithKline, MSD, Pfizer, and Reata, and research grants from Actelion. Joan A. Barberà reports receipt of honoraria for consultation or speaker fees from Actelion and Merck; and research support through his institution from Actelion, Merck, GlaxoSmithKline, and Ferrer. Joanna Pepke-Zaba reports research grants and speaker honoraria/consultancy fees from Actelion, Bayer/MSD, and GSK. Jean-Luc Vachiéry reports ongoing consultancies to Actelion, Sonnivie, Arena Pharma, Bial Portela, and Respira Therapeutics, past consultancies to AstraZeneca, BayerShering, CardioMEMS, GlaxoSmithKline, Pfizer, Merck, and United Therapeutics, and current membership of an advisory board or similar group for Actelion and GlaxoSmithKline. Jean-Luc Vachiéry's institution receives funding from Actelion Pharmaceuticals for performing clinical studies. Regina Steringer-Mascherbauer, Jens Klotsche, and Miguel-Angel Gomez Sanchez have no conflicts of interest relevant to the EXPERT study. Hossein-Ardeschir Ghofrani reports personal fees for advisory board work, and payment for lectures including service on speaker bureaus, from Actelion, Bayer, GSK, Novartis, and Pfizer; consultancy fees from Actelion, Bayer, Bellerophon Pulse Technologies, GSK, MSD, Novartis, and Pfizer; and grants from Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG). Pilar Escribano Subias reports personal fees from Actelion, Bayer AG, GlaxoSmithKline, and Merck Sharp & Dohme, and grants from Actelion, Bayer AG, GlaxoSmithKline, and Ferrer, outside the submitted work. Gérald Simonneau reports personal fees and non-financial support from Actelion, personal fees and non-financial support from Bayer, personal fees and non-financial support from MSD, outside the submitted work. Douglas S. Helmersen reports industry-sponsored research with Bayer AG, United Therapeutics, and Gilead Sciences, Inc., and advisory board/speaker fees from Bayer AG and Actelion. David Langleben reports honoraria, consultation fees, research support, and/or travel expenses from Actelion, Arena, Bayer AG, Northern Therapeutics, PhaseBio, Acceleron, Janssen, and United Therapeutics. Anco Boonstra reports consultancy fees from Pfizer BV and hospitality from Teva Nederland. Lisa M. Mielniczuk reports speaker fees and honoraria from Bayer AG, and speaker fees, consultancy fees, and travel fees from Actelion. Evgenia Williams and Christian Meier are employees of Bayer AG.

Background The risk of complications, including death, is substantially increased in patients with pulmonary hypertension (PH) undergoing anaesthesia for surgical procedures, especially in those with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) and chronic thromboembolic PH (CTEPH). Sedation also poses a risk to patients with PH. Physiological changes including tachycardia, hypotension, fluid shifts, and an increase in pulmonary vascular resistance (PH crisis) can precipitate acute right ventricular decompensation and death. Methods A systematic literature review was performed of studies in patients with PH undergoing non-cardiac and non-obstetric surgery. The management of patients with PH requiring sedation for endoscopy was also reviewed. Using a framework of relevant clinical questions, we review the available evidence guiding operative risk, risk assessment, preoperative optimisation, and perioperative management, and identifying areas for future research. Results Reported 30 day mortality after non-cardiac and non-obstetric surgery ranges between 2% and 18% in patients with PH undergoing elective procedures, and increases to 15–50% for emergency surgery, with complications and death usually relating to acute right ventricular failure. Risk factors for mortality include procedure-specific and patient-related factors, especially markers of PH severity (e.g. pulmonary haemodynamics, poor exercise performance, and right ventricular dysfunction). Most studies highlight the importance of individualised preoperative risk assessment and optimisation and advanced perioperative planning. Conclusions With an increasing number of patients requiring surgery in specialist and non-specialist PH centres, a systematic, evidence-based, multidisciplinary approach is required to minimise complications. Adequate risk stratification and a tailored-individualised perioperative plan is paramount.

Background: The risk of complications, including death, is markedly increased in patients with pulmonary hypertension (PH) undergoing anaesthesia for surgical procedures. We performed a systematic literature review of available studies in patients with PAH or chronic thromboembolic PH (CTEPH) undergoing non-cardiac, non-obstetric surgery, finding a mortality ranging between 2-18% in elective and 15-50% in emergency surgery. Methods/Results: We devised relevant clinical questions based on expert consensus opinion in order to provide recommendations of best practice, using a Delphi scoring method. Based on findings from our literature review and expert opinion, we provide 10 recommendations for best clinical practice involving (1) preoperative planning and the use of a perioperative MDT, (2) management of procedural sedation, (3) decision making where surgery is performed, (4) patient-related risk assessment, (5) procedure-related risk assessment, (6) perioperative optimization of PH therapies, (7) perioperative parenteral PAH therapy, (8) perioperative monitoring and anaesthetic management, (9) postoperative management, and (1) management of perioperative pulmonary hypertensive crises, including consideration of ECMO and lung transplantation. Areas for future research are also suggested. Conclusion: This was a collaborative project by UK PH services. We provide 10 recommendations for good clinical practice in this common clinical scenario, where risk assessment is crucial, as mortality remains high.

Early initiation of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) therapies is associated with improved long-term outcomes, yet data on the early use of prostacyclin pathway agents are limited. In these post hoc analyses of the Prostacyclin (PGIHow does time from diagnosis impact morbidity/mortality events and response to selexipag treatment in patients with PAH?The GRIPHON study randomly assigned 1,156 patients with PAH to selexipag or placebo treatment. Patients were categorized post hoc into a time from diagnosis of ≤ 6 months and6 months at randomization. Hazard ratios (selexipag vs placebo) were calculated for the primary end point of morbidity/mortality by time from diagnosis using Cox proportional hazard models.Time from diagnosis was ≤ 6 months in 34.9% and6 months in 65.1% of patients. Time from diagnosis was prognostic of morbidity/mortality, with newly diagnosed patients having a poorer long-term outcome than patients diagnosed for longer. Compared with placebo, selexipag reduced the risk of morbidity/mortality in patients with a time from diagnosis of ≤ 6 months and6 months, with a more pronounced effect in newly diagnosed patients (hazard ratio, 0.45 [95% CI, 0.33-0.63] and 0.74 [95% CI, 0.57-0.96], respectively; P = .0219 for interaction).In the GRIPHON study, newly diagnosed PAH patients had a worse prognosis than patients with a longer time from diagnosis. The benefit of selexipag treatment on disease progression was more pronounced in patients treated earlier than in patients treated later.ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT01106014; URL: www.clinicaltrials.gov.

A 67-year-old man presented with acute left hemiparesis 6 weeks after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) for atrial fibrillation. His medical history was notable for hypertension and a metallic aortic valve which was implanted 23 years previously for bicuspid aortic stenosis. He was warfarinised for his

Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by the novel Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), has affected over 30 million globally to date. Although high rates of venous thromboembolism and evidence of COVID-19-induced endothelial dysfunction have been reported, the precise aetiology of the increased thrombotic risk associated with COVID-19 infection remains to be fully elucidated. Therefore, we assessed clinical platelet parameters and circulating platelet activity in patients with severe and nonsevere COVID-19. An assessment of clinical blood parameters in patients with severe COVID-19 disease (requiring intensive care), patients with nonsevere disease (not requiring intensive care), general medical in-patients without COVID-19, and healthy donors was undertaken. Platelet function and activity were also assessed by secretion and specific marker analysis. We demonstrated that routine clinical blood parameters including increased mean platelet volume (MPV) and decreased platelet:neutrophil ratio are associated with disease severity in COVID-19 upon hospitalisation and intensive care unit (ICU) admission. Strikingly, agonist-induced ADP release was 30- to 90-fold higher in COVID-19 patients compared with hospitalised controls and circulating levels of platelet factor 4 (PF4), soluble P-selectin (sP-selectin), and thrombopoietin (TPO) were also significantly elevated in COVID-19. This study shows that distinct differences exist in routine full blood count and other clinical laboratory parameters between patients with severe and nonsevere COVID-19. Moreover, we have determined all COVID-19 patients possess hyperactive circulating platelets. These data suggest abnormal platelet reactivity may contribute to hypercoagulability in COVID-19 and confirms the role that platelets/clotting has in determining the severity of the disease and the complexity of the recovery path., The reason for the increased thrombotic risk associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection remains unclear. This study reveals that disease severity is associated with increased mean platelet volume and decreased platelet:neutrophil ratio; moreover, all COVID-19 patients possess hyperactive circulating platelets, with agonist-induced ADP release 30-to-90 fold higher than controls.