Search

Supplementary Figure S4 - PDF file 19K, Ectopic expression of MET in cetuximab sensitive DIFI and LIM1215 cell lines

Assessing APOBEC3 gene expression using immunohistochemical and bioinformatic approaches.

APOBEC3 gene expression during senescence and cell cycle progression.

Supplementary Table 1: Overview of data resource. Supplementary Table 2: List of antibodies used for immunofluorescence. Supplementary Table 3: List of antibodies used for western blotting. Supplementary Table 4. List of primers used for PCR.

Generation and characterization of A3A and A3B knockouts in TIIP cells.

A complete list of investigators in the Tracking Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Evolution through Therapy (TRACERx) Consortium

Correlation between APOBEC3 expression and different measures of CIN.

APOBEC3 enzymes are cytosine deaminases implicated in cancer. Precisely when APOBEC3 expression is induced during cancer development remains to be defined. Here we show that specific APOBEC3 genes are upregulated in breast ductal carcinoma in situ, and in preinvasive lung cancer lesions coincident with cellular proliferation. We observe evidence of APOBEC3-mediated subclonal mutagenesis propagated from TRACERx preinvasive to invasive non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) lesions. We find that APOBEC3B exacerbates DNA replication stress and chromosomal instability through incomplete replication of genomic DNA, manifested by accumulation of mitotic ultrafine bridges and 53BP1 nuclear bodies in the G1 phase of the cell cycle. Analysis of TRACERx NSCLC clinical samples and mouse lung cancer models revealed APOBEC3B expression driving replication stress and chromosome missegregation. We propose that APOBEC3 is functionally implicated in the onset of chromosomal instability and somatic mutational heterogeneity in preinvasive disease, providing fuel for selection early in cancer evolution.Significance:This study reveals the dynamics and drivers of APOBEC3 gene expression in preinvasive disease and the exacerbation of cellular diversity by APOBEC3B through DNA replication stress to promote chromosomal instability early in cancer evolution.This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 2355

Purpose: Targeted inhibition of EGFR with the mAbs cetuximab or panitumumab is a valuable treatment for RAS wild-type colorectal cancers. The efficacy of EGFR blockade is limited by the emergence of acquired resistance often attributed to secondary KRAS mutations. Remarkably, tumor biopsies from resistant patients show that only a fraction of the resilient cells carry KRAS mutations. We hypothesized that a paracrine cross-talk driven by the resistant subpopulation may provide in trans protection of surrounding sensitive cells.Experimental design: Conditioned medium assays and three-dimensional cocultures were used to assess paracrine networks between cetuximab-sensitive and -resistant cells. Production of EGFR ligands by cells sensitive to cetuximab and panitumumab was measured. The ability of recombinant EGFR ligands to protect sensitive cells from cetuximab was assessed. Biochemical activation of the EGFR signaling pathway was measured by Western blotting.Results: Colorectal cancer cells sensitive to EGFR blockade can successfully grow despite cetuximab treatment when in the company of their resistant derivatives. Media conditioned by resistant cells protect sensitive parental cells from cetuximab. EGFR blockade triggers increased secretion of TGFα and amphiregulin. Increased secretion of ligands by resistant cells can sustain EGFR/ERK signaling in sensitive cells.Conclusions: Colorectal cancer cells that develop resistance to cetuximab and panitumumab secrete TGFα and amphiregulin, which protect the surrounding cells from EGFR blockade. This paracrine protective mechanism might be therapeutically exploitable. Clin Cancer Res; 20(24); 6429–38. ©2014 AACR.

Purpose: Patients with colorectal cancer who respond to the anti-EGFR antibody cetuximab often develop resistance within several months of initiating therapy. To design new lines of treatment, the molecular landscape of resistant tumors must be ascertained. We investigated the role of mutations in the EGFR signaling axis on the acquisition of resistance to cetuximab in patients and cellular models.Experimental Design: Tissue samples were obtained from 37 patients with colorectal cancer who became refractory to cetuximab. Colorectal cancer cells sensitive to cetuximab were treated until resistant derivatives emerged. Mutational profiling of biopsies and cell lines was performed. Structural modeling and functional analyses were performed to causally associate the alleles to resistance.Results: The genetic profile of tumor specimens obtained after cetuximab treatment revealed the emergence of a complex pattern of mutations in EGFR, KRAS, NRAS, BRAF, and PIK3CA genes, including two novel EGFR ectodomain mutations (R451C and K467T). Mutational profiling of cetuximab-resistant cells recapitulated the molecular landscape observed in clinical samples and revealed three additional EGFR alleles: S464L, G465R, and I491M. Structurally, these mutations are located in the cetuximab-binding region, except for the R451C mutant. Functionally, EGFR ectodomain mutations prevent binding to cetuximab but a subset is permissive for interaction with panitumumab.Conclusions: Colorectal tumors evade EGFR blockade by constitutive activation of downstream signaling effectors and through mutations affecting receptor–antibody binding. Both mechanisms of resistance may occur concomitantly. Our data have implications for designing additional lines of therapy for patients with colorectal cancer who relapse upon treatment with anti-EGFR antibodies. Clin Cancer Res; 21(9); 2157–66. ©2015 AACR.

PDF file - 38K, Alternative comparative presentation of results presented in Figure 3 C-F.

Supplementary Table S3. Prevalence of EGFR mutations in resistant cell lines.

PDF file - 133K, Measurements of additional receptor ligands from conditioned media.

PDF file - 118K, LIM1215 knocked-in with a KRAS G12R mutation are also capable of paracrine protection of sensitive wild type (wt) cells and secrete higher levels of TGFalpha.

The file contains Supplementary Table and Figure Legends

Supplementary Figure S3. Nucleotide sequence of the EGFR gene in cetuximab resistant cell lines.

PDF file - 105K

PDF file - 95K, Schematic representation of conditioned medium assay (CMA).

Summary Loss of p53 function contributes to the development of many cancers. While cell-autonomous consequences of p53 mutation have been studied extensively, the role of p53 in regulating the anti-tumor immune response is still poorly understood. Here, we show that loss of p53 in cancer cells modulates the tumor-immune landscape to circumvent immune destruction. Deletion of p53 promotes the recruitment and instruction of suppressive myeloid CD11b+ cells, in part through increased expression of CXCR3/CCR2-associated chemokines and macrophage colony-stimulating factor (M-CSF), and attenuates the CD4+ T helper 1 (Th1) and CD8+ T cell responses in vivo. p53-null tumors also show an accumulation of suppressive regulatory T (Treg) cells. Finally, we show that two key drivers of tumorigenesis, activation of KRAS and deletion of p53, cooperate to promote immune tolerance., Graphical Abstract, Highlights • Tumor-specific loss of p53 delays tumor rejection in immune-competent hosts • p53 loss increases myeloid infiltration through enhanced cytokine secretion • The increase in Treg cells in response to loss of p53 is independent of Kras mutation • Kras mutations coordinate with p53 loss to regulate myeloid recruitment, TP53 is one of the most frequently mutated genes in cancer; however, its significance in controlling tumor-immune crosstalk is not fully understood. Blagih et al. highlight a key role for tumor-associated loss of p53, a common oncogenic event, in regulating myeloid and T cell responses.

Introduction: Increasing our understanding of drivers of mutagenesis in lung cancer is critical in our efforts to prevent tumor reoccurrence and resistance. Results: Using the multi-region TRACERx lung cancer study, we uncovered that APOBEC3B is significantly upregulated when compared with other APOBEC family members in EGFR driven lung cancer and identified subclonal enrichment of APOBEC mutational signatures. To model APOBEC mutagenesis in lung cancer, several novel EGFR mutant mouse models containing a human APOBEC3B transgene were generated. Using these models, it was uncovered that APOBEC3B expression is detrimental at tumor initiation when expressed continuously in a p53 wildtype background. This detrimental effect is likely due to elevated chromosomal instability, which was observed to increase significantly with APOBEC3B expression in an EGFR mutant TP53 deficient mouse model. Induction of subclonal expression of APOBEC3B in an EGFR mutant mouse model with tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy resulted in a significant increase in resistant tumor development. Significant downregulation of the base excision repair gene uracil-DNA glycosylase (UNG) was also observed in APOBEC3B expressing mice, which paralleled findings in patient tumors and cell lines treated with TKI therapy. Finally, a mouse mutational signature was identified in APOBEC3B expressing cell lines, reinforcing the idea that APOBEC driven mutagenesis contributes to TKI resistance. Conclusion: This study demonstrates a unique principle by which targeted therapy induces changes within tumors ideal for APOBEC driven tumor evolution, fueling therapy resistance. Citation Format: Manasi Mayekar, Deborah Caswell, Natalie Vokes, Emily K. Law, Wei Wu, William Hill, Eva Gronroos, Andrew Rowan, Maise Al Bakir, Clare Weeden, Caroline E. McCoach, Collin M. Blakely, Nuri Alpay Temiz, Ai Nagano, Daniel L. Kerr, Julia K. Rotow, Oriol Pich, Franziska Haderk, Michelle Dietzen, Carlos Martinez Ruiz, Bruna Almeida, Lauren Cech, Beatrice Gini, Joanna Przewrocka, Chris Moore, Miguel Murillo, Bjorn Bakker, Brandon Rule, Cameron Durfee, Shigeki Nanj, Lisa Tan, Lindsay K. Larson, Prokopios P. Argyris, William L. Brown, Johnny Yu, Carlos Gomez, Philippe Gui, Rachel I. Vogel, Elizabeth A. Yu, Nicholas J. Thomas, Subramanian Venkatesan, Sebastijan Hobor, Su Kit Chew, Nicholas McGranahan, Nnennaya Kanu, Eliezer M. Van Allen, Julian Downward, Reuben S. Harris, Trever Bivona, Charles Swanton. Targeted cancer therapy induces APOBEC fueling the evolution of drug resistance [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr 2197.

Introductory paragraphThe clinical success of targeted cancer therapy is limited by drug resistance that renders cancers lethal in patients1-4. Human tumours can evolve therapy resistance by acquiringde novogenetic alterations and increased heterogeneity via mechanisms that remain incompletely understood1. Here, through parallel analysis of human clinical samples, tumour xenograft and cell line models and murine model systems, we uncover an unanticipated mechanism of therapy-induced adaptation that fuels the evolution of drug resistance. Targeted therapy directed against EGFR and ALK oncoproteins in lung cancer induced adaptations favoring apolipoprotein B mRNA-editing enzyme, catalytic polypeptide (APOBEC)-mediated genome mutagenesis. In human oncogenicEGFR-driven andALK-driven lung cancers and preclinical models, EGFR or ALK inhibitor treatment induced the expression and DNA mutagenic activity ofAPOBEC3Bvia therapy-mediated activation of NF-κB signaling. Moreover, targeted therapy also mediated downregulation of certain DNA repair enzymes such as UNG2, which normally counteracts APOBEC-catalyzed DNA deamination events. In mutantEGFR-driven lung cancer mouse models, APOBEC3B was detrimental to tumour initiation and yet advantageous to tumour progression during EGFR targeted therapy, consistent with TRACERx data demonstrating subclonal enrichment of APOBEC-mediated mutagenesis. This study reveals how cancers adapt and drive genetic diversity in response to targeted therapy and identifies APOBEC deaminases as future targets for eliciting more durable clinical benefit to targeted cancer therapy.

Continuous cancer growth is driven by subsets of self-renewing malignant cells. Targeting of uncontrolled self-renewal through inhibition of stem cell-related signaling pathways has proven challenging. Here, we show that cancer cells can be selectively deprived of self-renewal ability by interfering with their epigenetic state. Re-expression of histone H1.0, a tumor-suppressive factor that inhibits cancer cell self-renewal in many cancer types, can be broadly induced by the clinically well-tolerated compound Quisinostat. Through H1.0, Quisinostat inhibits cancer cell self-renewal and halts tumor maintenance without affecting normal stem cell function. Quisinostat also hinders expansion of cells surviving targeted therapy, independently of the cancer types and the resistance mechanism, and inhibits disease relapse in mouse models of lung cancer. Our results identify H1.0 as a major mediator of Quisinostat’s antitumor effect and suggest that sequential administration of targeted therapy and Quisinostat may be a broadly applicable strategy to induce a prolonged response in patients., Targeting self-renewing cancer cells without deleterious side effects in normal tissues has proven challenging. Here, the authors show that the well-tolerated HDAC inhibitor Quisinostat safely inhibits tumor maintenance and disease relapse by restoring high levels of histone H1.0.

APOBEC3 enzymes are cytosine deaminases implicated in cancer. Precisely when APOBEC3 expression is induced during cancer development remains to be defined. Here we show that specific APOBEC3 genes are upregulated in breast ductal carcinoma in situ, and in preinvasive lung cancer lesions coincident with cellular proliferation. We observe evidence of APOBEC3-mediated subclonal mutagenesis propagated from TRACERx preinvasive to invasive non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) lesions. We find that APOBEC3B exacerbates DNA replication stress and chromosomal instability through incomplete replication of genomic DNA, manifested by accumulation of mitotic ultrafine bridges and 53BP1 nuclear bodies in the G1 phase of the cell cycle. Analysis of TRACERx NSCLC clinical samples and mouse lung cancer models revealed APOBEC3B expression driving replication stress and chromosome missegregation. We propose that APOBEC3 is functionally implicated in the onset of chromosomal instability and somatic mutational heterogeneity in preinvasive disease, providing fuel for selection early in cancer evolution. Significance: This study reveals the dynamics and drivers of APOBEC3 gene expression in preinvasive disease and the exacerbation of cellular diversity by APOBEC3B through DNA replication stress to promote chromosomal instability early in cancer evolution. This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 2355

The evolutionary features of clear-cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) have not been systematically studied to date. We analyzed 1,206 primary tumor regions from 101 patients recruited into the multi-center prospective study, TRACERx Renal. We observe up to 30 driver events per tumor and show that subclonal diversification is associated with known prognostic parameters. By resolving the patterns of driver event ordering, co-occurrence, and mutual exclusivity at clone level, we show the deterministic nature of clonal evolution. ccRCC can be grouped into seven evolutionary subtypes, ranging from tumors characterized by early fixation of multiple mutational and copy number drivers and rapid metastases to highly branched tumors with > 10 subclonal drivers and extensive parallel evolution associated with attenuated progression. We identify genetic diversity and chromosomal complexity as determinants of patient outcome. Our insights reconcile the variable clinical behavior of ccRCC and suggest evolutionary potential as a biomarker for both intervention and surveillance. We thank Aida Murra, Naheed Shaikh, Justine Korteweg, Jeremy Tai, Eleanor Carlyle, Leonora Conneely, KimEdmonds, Karla Lingard, Karen O'Meara, Helen Breeze, Sarah Sarker, Lesley Cooper, Linda Shephard, Susie Slater, and Catherine Rogers for study support. We thank the patients and their families. S.T. and H.X. are funded by Cancer Research UK (CRUK) (C50947/A18176). S.T., T.C., J.L., and M.G. are funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre (BRC) at the Royal Marsden Hospital and Institute of Cancer Research (A109). J.I.L. is funded by the Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad (MINECO, SAF2016-79847-R). M.S., A.S., J. Lynch, R.F., L.A., and L.S. are funded by the Royal Marsden Cancer Charity. K.L. is funded by UK Medical Research Council (MR/P014712/1). T.B.K.W. is funded by the European Union Seventh Framework Programme (FP7-People-2013-ITN). M.J.-H. is funded by the NIHR. N.M.L. is a Winton Group Leader in recognition of the Winton Charitable Foundation's support towards the establishment of The Francis Crick Institute. N.M.L. is additionally funded by a Wellcome Trust Joint Investigator Award (103760/Z/14/Z) and the MRC eMedLab Medical Bioinformatics Infrastructure Award (MR/L016311/1). M.K. is funded by the Danish Cancer Society grant (R90-A6213). P.C. is funded by the Wellcome Trust (WT088340MA). N.M. receives funding from CRUK, Rosetrees, and the NIHR BRC at University College London Hospitals. C.S. is a Royal Society Napier Research Professor. C.S. is funded by Cancer Research UK (TRACERx and CRUK Cancer Immunotherapy Catalyst Network), the CRUK Lung Cancer Centre of Excellence, Stand Up 2 Cancer (SU2C), the Rosetrees and Stoneygate Trusts, NovoNordisk Foundation (THESEUS), Marie Curie Network PloidyNet, the NIHR BRC at University College London Hospitals, and the CRUK University College London Experimental Cancer Medicine Centre. C.S., O.P., D.R., I.C., and Z.S. are funded by NovoNordisk Foundation (16584). O.P., D.R., and I.C. are funded by the National Research, Development and Innovation Office of Hungary (NVKP_16-1-20160004). This work was supported by CRUK (Clinical Scientist Fellowship to S.T., C50947/A18176), The Francis Crick Institute, which receives its core funding from Cancer Reseach UK (FC010110), the UK Medical Research Council (FC010110), the Wellcome Trust (FC010110), and NIHR BRC at the Royal Marsden Hospital and Institute of Cancer Research (A109). High-performance computing was supported by eMedLab. The results published here are in whole or part based upon data generated by the TCGA Research Network: http://cancergenome.nih.gov/.

Purpose: Patients with colorectal cancer who respond to the anti-EGFR antibody cetuximab often develop resistance within several months of initiating therapy. To design new lines of treatment, the molecular landscape of resistant tumors must be ascertained. We investigated the role of mutations in the EGFR signaling axis on the acquisition of resistance to cetuximab in patients and cellular models. Experimental Design: Tissue samples were obtained from 37 patients with colorectal cancer who became refractory to cetuximab. Colorectal cancer cells sensitive to cetuximab were treated until resistant derivatives emerged. Mutational profiling of biopsies and cell lines was performed. Structural modeling and functional analyses were performed to causally associate the alleles to resistance. Results: The genetic profile of tumor specimens obtained after cetuximab treatment revealed the emergence of a complex pattern of mutations in EGFR, KRAS, NRAS, BRAF, and PIK3CA genes, including two novel EGFR ectodomain mutations (R451C and K467T). Mutational profiling of cetuximab-resistant cells recapitulated the molecular landscape observed in clinical samples and revealed three additional EGFR alleles: S464L, G465R, and I491M. Structurally, these mutations are located in the cetuximab-binding region, except for the R451C mutant. Functionally, EGFR ectodomain mutations prevent binding to cetuximab but a subset is permissive for interaction with panitumumab. Conclusions: Colorectal tumors evade EGFR blockade by constitutive activation of downstream signaling effectors and through mutations affecting receptor–antibody binding. Both mechanisms of resistance may occur concomitantly. Our data have implications for designing additional lines of therapy for patients with colorectal cancer who relapse upon treatment with anti-EGFR antibodies. Clin Cancer Res; 21(9); 2157–66. ©2015 AACR.

Purpose: Targeted inhibition of EGFR with the mAbs cetuximab or panitumumab is a valuable treatment for RAS wild-type colorectal cancers. The efficacy of EGFR blockade is limited by the emergence of acquired resistance often attributed to secondary KRAS mutations. Remarkably, tumor biopsies from resistant patients show that only a fraction of the resilient cells carry KRAS mutations. We hypothesized that a paracrine cross-talk driven by the resistant subpopulation may provide in trans protection of surrounding sensitive cells. Experimental design: Conditioned medium assays and three-dimensional cocultures were used to assess paracrine networks between cetuximab-sensitive and -resistant cells. Production of EGFR ligands by cells sensitive to cetuximab and panitumumab was measured. The ability of recombinant EGFR ligands to protect sensitive cells from cetuximab was assessed. Biochemical activation of the EGFR signaling pathway was measured by Western blotting. Results: Colorectal cancer cells sensitive to EGFR blockade can successfully grow despite cetuximab treatment when in the company of their resistant derivatives. Media conditioned by resistant cells protect sensitive parental cells from cetuximab. EGFR blockade triggers increased secretion of TGFα and amphiregulin. Increased secretion of ligands by resistant cells can sustain EGFR/ERK signaling in sensitive cells. Conclusions: Colorectal cancer cells that develop resistance to cetuximab and panitumumab secrete TGFα and amphiregulin, which protect the surrounding cells from EGFR blockade. This paracrine protective mechanism might be therapeutically exploitable. Clin Cancer Res; 20(24); 6429–38. ©2014 AACR.

Summary Chromosomal instability (CIN) contributes to cancer evolution, intratumor heterogeneity, and drug resistance. CIN is driven by chromosome segregation errors and a tolerance phenotype that permits the propagation of aneuploid genomes. Through genomic analysis of colorectal cancers and cell lines, we find frequent loss of heterozygosity and mutations in BCL9L in aneuploid tumors. BCL9L deficiency promoted tolerance of chromosome missegregation events, propagation of aneuploidy, and genetic heterogeneity in xenograft models likely through modulation of Wnt signaling. We find that BCL9L dysfunction contributes to aneuploidy tolerance in both TP53-WT and mutant cells by reducing basal caspase-2 levels and preventing cleavage of MDM2 and BID. Efforts to exploit aneuploidy tolerance mechanisms and the BCL9L/caspase-2/BID axis may limit cancer diversity and evolution., Graphical Abstract, Highlights • Loss-of-function alterations in BCL9L are frequent in aneuploid CRC • BCL9L dysfunction drives aneuploidy tolerance by reducing levels of caspase-2 • Caspase-2 activation following aneuploidy results in MDM2 and BID cleavage • p53 stabilization after chromosome missegregation is regulated by caspase-2, López-García et al. find that BCL9L is often genetically inactivated in human colorectal cancers with chromosomal instability. BCL9L dysfunction promotes aneuploidy tolerance by reducing basal caspase-2 levels and preventing cleavage of MDM2 and BID independent of TP53 mutation status.

SummaryThere are no effective therapies for the ∼30% of human malignancies with mutant RAS oncogenes. Using a kinome-centered synthetic lethality screen, we find that suppression of the ERBB3 receptor tyrosine kinase sensitizes KRAS mutant lung and colon cancer cells to MEK inhibitors. We show that MEK inhibition results in MYC-dependent transcriptional upregulation of ERBB3, which is responsible for intrinsic drug resistance. Drugs targeting both EGFR and ERBB2, each capable of forming heterodimers with ERBB3, can reverse unresponsiveness to MEK inhibition by decreasing inhibitory phosphorylation of the proapoptotic proteins BAD and BIM. Moreover, ERBB3 protein level is a biomarker of response to combinatorial treatment. These data suggest a combination strategy for treating KRAS mutant colon and lung cancers and a way to identify the tumors that are most likely to benefit from such combinatorial treatment.

KRAS mutations are the most common oncogenic event in colorectal cancer (CRC) progression and their occurrence is associated with lack of response to anti epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) targeted therapies. Using preclinical models and patients' samples we recently reported that the emergence of KRAS mutations but also KRAS amplification is associated with acquired resistance to the EGFR inhibitors cetuximab or panitumumab. We reasoned that KRAS amplification may also be responsible for primary resistance to these agents. Furthermore, while the prevalence of KRAS mutations has been well established in CRC, little is known about the frequency of KRAS amplification in large CRC series. We performed a screening of 1,039 CRC samples to assess the prevalence of KRAS amplification in this tumor type and further evaluated the role of this genetic alteration on the sensitivity to anti EGFR therapies. We detected KRAS amplification in 7/1,039 (0.67%) and 1/102 evaluable CRC specimens and cell lines, respectively. KRAS amplification was mutually exclusive with KRAS mutations. Tumors or cell lines harboring this genetic lesion are not responsive to anti-EGFR inhibitors. Although KRAS amplification is an infrequent event in CRC, it might be responsible for precluding response to anti-EGFR treatment in a small proportion of patients.

A main limitation of therapies that selectively target kinase signalling pathways is the emergence of secondary drug resistance. Cetuximab, a monoclonal antibody that binds the extracellular domain of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), is effective in a subset of KRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancers. After an initial response, secondary resistance invariably ensues, thereby limiting the clinical benefit of this drug. The molecular bases of secondary resistance to cetuximab in colorectal cancer are poorly understood. Here we show that molecular alterations (in most instances point mutations) of KRAS are causally associated with the onset of acquired resistance to anti-EGFR treatment in colorectal cancers. Expression of mutant KRAS under the control of its endogenous gene promoter was sufficient to confer cetuximab resistance, but resistant cells remained sensitive to combinatorial inhibition of EGFR and mitogen-activated protein-kinase kinase (MEK). Analysis of metastases from patients who developed resistance to cetuximab or panitumumab showed the emergence of KRAS amplification in one sample and acquisition of secondary KRAS mutations in 60% (6 out of 10) of the cases. KRAS mutant alleles were detectable in the blood of cetuximab-treated patients as early as 10 months before radiographic documentation of disease progression. In summary, the results identify KRAS mutations as frequent drivers of acquired resistance to cetuximab in colorectal cancers, indicate that the emergence of KRAS mutant clones can be detected non-invasively months before radiographic progression and suggest early initiation of a MEK inhibitor as a rational strategy for delaying or reversing drug resistance.

Colorectal cancers (CRCs) evolve by a reiterative process of genetic diversification and clonal evolution. The molecular profile of CRC is routinely assessed in surgical or bioptic samples. Genotyping of CRC tissue has inherent limitations; a tissue sample represents a single snapshot in time, and it is subjected to spatial selection bias owing to tumor heterogeneity. Repeated tissue samples are difficult to obtain and cannot be used for dynamic monitoring of disease progression and response to therapy. We exploited circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) to genotype colorectal tumors and track clonal evolution during treatment with the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-specific antibodies cetuximab or panitumumab. We identified alterations in ctDNA of patients with primary or acquired resistance to EGFR blockade in the following genes: KRAS, NRAS, MET, ERBB2, FLT3, EGFR and MAP2K1. Mutated KRAS clones, which emerge in blood during EGFR blockade, decline upon withdrawal of EGFR-specific antibodies, indicating that clonal evolution continues beyond clinical progression. Pharmacogenomic analysis of CRC cells that had acquired resistance to cetuximab reveals that upon antibody withdrawal KRAS clones decay, whereas the population regains drug sensitivity. ctDNA profiles of individuals who benefit from multiple challenges with anti-EGFR antibodies exhibit pulsatile levels of mutant KRAS. These results indicate that the CRC genome adapts dynamically to intermittent drug schedules and provide a molecular explanation for the efficacy of rechallenge therapies based on EGFR blockade.

Colorectal cancers (CRCs) that are sensitive to the anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) antibodies cetuximab or panitumumab almost always develop resistance within several months of initiating therapy. We report the emergence of polyclonal KRAS, NRAS, and BRAF mutations in CRC cells with acquired resistance to EGFR blockade. Regardless of the genetic alterations, resistant cells consistently displayed mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase (MEK) and extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) activation, which persisted after EGFR blockade. Inhibition of MEK1/2 alone failed to impair the growth of resistant cells in vitro and in vivo. An RNA interference screen demonstrated that suppression of EGFR, together with silencing of MEK1/2, was required to hamper the proliferation of resistant cells. Indeed, concomitant pharmacological blockade of MEK and EGFR induced prolonged ERK inhibition and severely impaired the growth of resistant tumor cells. Heterogeneous and concomitant mutations in KRAS and NRAS were also detected in plasma samples from patients who developed resistance to anti-EGFR antibodies. A mouse xenotransplant from a CRC patient who responded and subsequently relapsed upon EGFR therapy showed exquisite sensitivity to combinatorial treatment with MEK and EGFR inhibitors. Collectively, these results identify genetically distinct mechanisms that mediate secondary resistance to anti-EGFR therapies, all of which reactivate ERK signaling. These observations provide a rational strategy to overcome the multifaceted clonal heterogeneity that emerges when tumors are treated with targeted agents. We propose that MEK inhibitors, in combination with cetuximab or panitumumab, should be tested in CRC patients who become refractory to anti-EGFR therapies.

Treatment of BRAF(V600E) mutant melanoma by small molecule drugs that target the BRAF or MEK kinases can be effective, but resistance develops invariably. In contrast, colon cancers that harbour the same BRAF(V600E) mutation are intrinsically resistant to BRAF inhibitors, due to feedback activation of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). Here we show that 6 out of 16 melanoma tumours analysed acquired EGFR expression after the development of resistance to BRAF or MEK inhibitors. Using a chromatin-regulator-focused short hairpin RNA (shRNA) library, we find that suppression of sex determining region Y-box 10 (SOX10) in melanoma causes activation of TGF-β signalling, thus leading to upregulation of EGFR and platelet-derived growth factor receptor-β (PDGFRB), which confer resistance to BRAF and MEK inhibitors. Expression of EGFR in melanoma or treatment with TGF-β results in a slow-growth phenotype with cells displaying hallmarks of oncogene-induced senescence. However, EGFR expression or exposure to TGF-β becomes beneficial for proliferation in the presence of BRAF or MEK inhibitors. In a heterogeneous population of melanoma cells having varying levels of SOX10 suppression, cells with low SOX10 and consequently high EGFR expression are rapidly enriched in the presence of drug, but this is reversed when the drug treatment is discontinued. We find evidence for SOX10 loss and/or activation of TGF-β signalling in 4 of the 6 EGFR-positive drug-resistant melanoma patient samples. Our findings provide a rationale for why some BRAF or MEK inhibitor-resistant melanoma patients may regain sensitivity to these drugs after a 'drug holiday' and identify patients with EGFR-positive melanoma as a group that may benefit from re-treatment after a drug holiday.

EGF receptor (EGFR)-targeted monoclonal antibodies are effective in a subset of metastatic colorectal cancers. Inevitably, all patients develop resistance, which occurs through emergence of KRAS mutations in approximately 50% of the cases. We show that amplification of the MET proto-oncogene is associated with acquired resistance in tumors that do not develop KRAS mutations during anti-EGFR therapy. Amplification of the MET locus was present in circulating tumor DNA before relapse was clinically evident. Functional studies show that MET activation confers resistance to anti-EGFR therapy both in vitro and in vivo. Notably, in patient-derived colorectal cancer xenografts, MET amplification correlated with resistance to EGFR blockade, which could be overcome by MET kinase inhibitors. These results highlight the role of MET in mediating primary and secondary resistance to anti-EGFR therapies in colorectal cancer and encourage the use of MET inhibitors in patients displaying resistance as a result of MET amplification. Significance: Amplification of the MET proto-oncogene is responsible for de novo and acquired resistance to anti-EGFR therapy in a subset of colorectal cancers. As multiple anti-MET therapeutic strategies are available, these findings offer immediate novel opportunities to design clinical studies. Cancer Discov; 3(6); 658–73. ©2013 AACR. This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 591

Colorectal cancer (CRC) patients who respond to the anti-EGFR antibody cetuximab often develop resistance within several months of initiating therapy. To design new lines of treatment the molecular landscape of resistant tumors must be ascertained. We investigated the role of mutations in the EGFR signalling axis on the acquisition of resistance to cetuximab in patients and cellular models. Mutational profiling was performed on both biopsies collected from 37 CRC patients who became refractory to cetuximab and on a collection of cetuximab-resistant derivatives obtained from CRC cells sensitive to EGFR blockade. The genetic profile of tumor specimens obtained after cetuximab treatment revealed the emergence of a complex pattern of mutations in EGFR, KRAS, NRAS, BRAF and PIK3CA genes, including two novel EGFR ectodomain mutations. Mutational profiling of cetuximab resistant cells recapitulated the molecular landscape observed in clinical samples and revealed three additional EGFR ectodomain alleles. Structural modelling showed that these mutations are located in the cetuximab-binding region, except for one mutant. Functionally, EGFR ectodomain mutations prevent binding to cetuximab but a subset is permissive for interaction with panitumumab. In conclusion, we reported that colorectal tumors evade EGFR blockade by constitutive activation of downstream signalling effectors and through mutations affecting receptor-antibody binding. Both mechanisms of resistance may occur concomitantly. Our data have implications for designing additional lines of therapy for CRC patients who relapse upon treatment with anti-EGFR antibodies. Citation Format: Luca Lazzari, Sabrina Arena, Beatriz Bellosillo, Giulia Siravegna, Alejandro Martínez, Israel Cañadas, Noelia Ferruz, Mariangela Russo, Sandra Misale, Iria González, Mar Iglesias, Elena Gavilan, Giorgio Corti, Sebastijan Hobor, Giovanni Crisafulli, Marta Salido, Juan Sánchez, Alba Dalmases, Joaquim Bellmunt, Gianni De Fabritiis, Ana Rovira, Federica Di Nicolantonio, Joan Albanell, Alberto Bardelli, Clara Montagut. Emergence of multiple EGFR extracellular mutations during cetuximab treatment in colorectal cancer. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 106th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2015 Apr 18-22; Philadelphia, PA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(15 Suppl):Abstract nr 3588. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2015-3588

Occurence of acquired resistance constitutes one of the major limitations to tumor treatment. In colorectal cancer, the use of anti-EGFR antibodies such as cetuximab and panitumumab is effective in only 15-20% of patients, till secondary resistance to targeted treatment develops. Shedding light on the molecular basis of resistance represents then a mandatory effort in order to foster new lines of therapy. We recently showed that KRAS mutations are responsible for the emergence of secondary resistance to EGFR therapy in a subset of CRC patients (Misale et al., Nature 2012). Here we investigated the role of additional genetic alterations in the development of resistance to EGFR blockade in CRCs. We initially exploited the “liquid biopsy” approach to measure tumor derived DNA mutations in the blood of patients who initially responded and then became refractory to either cetuximab or panitumumab. We found that multiple KRAS and NRAS alleles often emerge during treatment. To better characterize the role of these genetic alterations in CRC, we generated preclinical models, by chronic treatment of several CRC cell lines with cetuximab or panitumumab until resistant derivatives emerged. The resistant populations were a mixture of clones bearing an heterogeneous panel of genetic alterations in KRAS, NRAS and BRAF at various frequencies. Biochemical pathway analyses revealed that, regardless of the genetic alterations, resistant derivatives consistently displayed MEK and ERK activation, which persisted on EGFR inhibition. Collectively, these results identify genetically distinct mechanisms that mediate secondary resistance to anti-EGFR therapies, all of which converge on the reactivation of ERK signaling. With this work, we provide a rational strategy to overcome the multifaceted clonal heterogeneity that emerges when tumors are treated with anti-EGFR drugs; we propose that MEK inhibitors, in combination with cetuximab or panitumumab, should be considered for the treatment of CRC patients who become refractory to anti-EGFR therapies. Citation Information: Mol Cancer Ther 2013;12(11 Suppl):B110. Citation Format: Sabrina Arena, Sandra Misale, Simona Lamba, Giulia Siravegna, Alice Lallo, Sebastijan Hobor, Mariangela Russo, Michela Buscarino, Andrea Sartore-Bianchi, Katia Bencardino, Alessio Amatu, Salvatore Siena, Federica Di Nicolantonio, Alberto Bardelli. Heterogeneous genetic alterations emerge during acquired resistance to anti-EGFR therapy in colorectal cancer. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR-NCI-EORTC International Conference: Molecular Targets and Cancer Therapeutics; 2013 Oct 19-23; Boston, MA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Mol Cancer Ther 2013;12(11 Suppl):Abstract nr B110.

Monoclonal antibodies targeting EGFR are used in the clinic to treat KRAS wild type metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC). After an initial response, secondary resistance occurs thereby limiting the clinical benefit of these drugs. Relapsed patients have no further therapeutic options, therefore, elucidating the molecular basis of resistance is a prerequisite for the development of further lines of therapy. We took advantage from a panel of CRC cell lines sensitive to EGFR inhibition by treating with cetuximab or panitumumab until resistant derivatives emerged. The resistant populations were heterogeneous mixture of cells bearing different alterations in KRAS, NRAS and BRAF genes at various frequencies. An RNA interference (siRNA) genetic screening unveiled that suppression of MEK1/2 together with silencing of EGFR was effective in impairing the growth of the resistant cells. Combinatorial treatment with pimasertib, a selective allosteric MEK inhibitor, together with cetuximab re-sensitizes anti-EGFR resistant derivatives despite the genetic alterations heterogeneity. Combinatorial treatment was effective in vitro and in vivo both in cell derived xenografts and in an acquired resistant patient derived xenograft (xenopatient). These observations provide a rational strategy to overcome the multifaceted clonal heterogeneity that emerges when tumors are treated with targeted agents. We propose that MEK inhibitors, in combination with cetuximab or panitumumab, should be tested in clinical trials in CRC patients who become refractory to anti-EGFR therapies. Citation Information: Mol Cancer Ther 2013;12(11 Suppl):C94. Citation Format: Sandra Misale, Sabrina Arena, Simona Lamba, Giulia Siravegna, Alice Lallo, Sebastijan Hobor, Mariangela Russo, Michela Buscarino, Andrea Sartore-Bianchi, Katia Bencardino, Alessio Amatu, Salvatore Siena, Federica Di Nicolantonio, Alberto Bardelli. Heterogeneous mechanisms of acquired resistance to anti-EGFR therapies in colorectal cancer are sensitive to concomitant inhibition of EGFR and MEK. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR-NCI-EORTC International Conference: Molecular Targets and Cancer Therapeutics; 2013 Oct 19-23; Boston, MA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Mol Cancer Ther 2013;12(11 Suppl):Abstract nr C94.

11005 Background: The anti EGFR monoclonal antibodies cetuximab and panitumumab are used to treat metastatic colorectal cancer patients but their clinical efficacy is limited by the development of acquired resistance. We recently reported that secondary KRAS mutations are responsible for acquired resistance in approximately 50% of the patients who initially respond to cetuximab or panitumumab (Misale et al., Nature 2012; Diaz et al., Nature 2012). Here we studied the molecular bases of relapse in CRC patients who do not develop KRAS mutations during the course of anti-EGFR therapy. Methods: Next generation sequencing was applied to tumor biopsies to identify genetic alterations associated with relapse to cetuximab and panitumumab in mCRC patients. Detection and quantitation of genetic alterations in circulating tumor DNA was used to monitor the occurrence of KRAS mutations and MET amplification in blood samples. Results: Molecular analyses of tumor biopsies from patients who did not develop KRAS mutations during anti-EGFR therapy revealed high level of amplification of the MET proto-oncogene in 3/5 cases. Quantitative PCR, FISH and IHC analysis confirmed high level of MET amplification in the post-therapy samples but not in the matched pre-treatment tissues. We developed a PCR based assay to detect the presence of the MET amplicon in circulating, cell-free, DNA. We found that MET amplification could be detected in the blood as early as 3 months after initiation of anti EGFR therapy. To functionally evaluate the role of MET amplification on resistance to anti EGFR antibody therapies we exploited patient-derived CRC xenografts (‘xenopatients). We found that (2/2) xenopatients established from MET amplified tumors were completely refractory to cetuximab but showed sensitivity to the Met inhibitor crizotinib. Conclusions: Amplification of the MET proto-oncogene is responsible for acquired acquired resistance to anti-EGFR antibody therapy in a subset of CRCs. The emergence of MET amplification in circulating, cell-free, DNA may be used to select patients most likely to benefit from anti MET therapies.

A main limitation of therapies that selectively target kinase signaling pathways is the emergence of secondary drug resistance. Cetuximab, a monoclonal antibody that binds the extracellular domain of EGFR, is effective in a subset of KRAS wild type metastatic colorectal cancers. After an initial response, secondary resistance invariably ensues, thereby limiting the clinical benefit of this drug. The molecular bases of secondary resistance to cetuximab in colorectal cancer are poorly understood. Here, we show for the first time that molecular alterations (in most instances point mutations) of KRAS are causally associated with the onset of acquired resistance to anti-EGFR treatment in colorectal cancers. Expression of mutant KRAS under the control of its endogenous gene promoter was sufficient to confer cetuximab resistance but resistant cells remained sensitive to combinatorial inhibition of EGFR and MEK (Figure 1). Analysis of metastases from patients who developed resistance to cetuximab or panitumumab showed the emergence of KRAS amplification in one sample and acquisition of secondary KRAS mutations in 60 % (6/10) of the cases (Table 1). KRAS mutant alleles were detectable in the blood of cetuximab treated patients as early as 10 months prior to radiographic documentation of disease progression. In summary, the results identify KRAS mutations as frequent drivers of acquired resistance to cetuximab in colorectal cancers, indicate that the emergence of KRAS mutant clones can be detected non-invasively months prior to radiographic progression and suggest early initiation of a MEK inhibitor as a rational strategy for delaying or reversing drug resistance.