Search

Objective: The purpose of this systematic review is to evaluate the evidence for the use of progestin subdermal implants for the treatment of endometriosis-related pain symptoms and quality of life., Methods: A literature search of PubMed, Ovid (MEDLINE and EMBASE), and Web of Science was performed from inception to December 2020. In addition, a targeted search of cited references was also performed. Our search identified 330 articles of which 17 were deemed eligible for full-text review. Eligible studies included randomized control trials, observational studies, and case series with at least 5 cases, investigating the effect of progestin subdermal implants on endometriosis-related pain scores in women of reproductive age with a clinical, radiologic, or surgical diagnosis of endometriosis. Six articles were excluded after the full-text screen., Results: Eleven articles describing a total of 335 patients were eligible for inclusion. Across all studies, etonogestrel- and segesterone-releasing progestin subdermal implants improved VAS pain scores for cyclic pelvic pain/dysmenorrhea (VAS at baseline ranged from 6.1 to 7.5 cm and after treatment from 1.7 to 4.9 cm, n  = 121), non-cyclic pelvic pain (baseline VAS 7.2-7.6 cm and after treatment 2.0-3.7 cm, n  = 96) and dyspareunia (baseline VAS 1.61-8.3 cm and after treatment 1.0-7.1 cm, n  = 87). Symptom improvement with the progestin subdermal implant was equivalent to treatment with depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA; average baseline VAS 6.5 and after DMPA treatment 3.0, compared to 2.0 after treatment with the implant) or the 52 mg levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS; baseline cyclic and non-cyclic pain scores 7.3 and 7.4 respectively decreased to 1.9 and 1.9 after LNG-IUS treatment). Improvements were also demonstrated in quality-of-life scores (average improvement of 36% in all domains of the Endometriosis Health Profile-30 and significant improvements in social functioning, general health, bodily pain, vitality and mental health domains on the Short Form-36 questionnaire) and sexual function (total sexual function score improved from 24 to 25.35 and 26.25 at 6 and 12 months)., Conclusion: Etonogestrel- and segesterone-releasing progestin subdermal implants appear to improve endometriosis-related pain symptoms and quality of life and may provide an additional component in the management of endometriosis. However, this systematic review is limited by the small sample size and heterogeneity in the data. As such, larger prospective randomized trials are needed to guide further management., Prospero Registration: CRD42021225665.

Objective: Attitudes and barriers towards HPV vaccination were explored in a population of male surgeons in Gynecology and Otolaryngology in Ontario, Canada., Materials/methods: An internet-based survey was distributed to male residents and physicians affiliated with the departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology, and Otolaryngology at six Ontario universities. The survey consisted of 16 questions (3 demographic, 3 workplace exposure, 6 regarding personal vaccination, and 3 regarding patient vaccination). Subgroup analyses examined differences between residents versus staff physicians and gynecologists versus otolaryngologists., Results: Most respondents (51/63, 81.0%) had not been vaccinated against HPV, yet would consider vaccination in the future (41/51, 80.4%). Significantly more residents would consider vaccination compared to staff physicians (p = .03). Personal protection from benign HPV disease was the most common motivating factor (25/59, 42.4%) among participants. A notable barrier to vaccination was "age over recommendations" (9/44, 20.4%). Most participants would recommend the HPV vaccine to both male patients (49/62, 79.0%) and male partners of female patients (47/62, 75.8%)., Conclusions: This study demonstrates male gynecologists and otolaryngologists had largely favorable attitudes towards HPV vaccination though few had received vaccination. These findings may be used to increase HPV vaccine uptake among male health care professionals and their patients., (Copyright © 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

The 2013 pan-Canadian consensus Report on Resident Duty Hours identified that traditional 24-hour duty periods pose risks to the well-being of residents and should be avoided. In anticipation of duty-hour restrictions, the Obstetrics and Gynaecology Residency Program at the University of Toronto developed and implemented a night float (NF) call model over a three-year span. Quarterly resident surveys have consistently shown that the NF system is preferred to traditional 24-hour call and has resulted in reduced fatigue and improved continuity of patient care. Through many iterations, the NF model achieved levels of resident morale, surgical experience, and impact on family relationships that are comparable to the 24-hour call system. We review here our process for developing an NF call model and the perceptions and experiences of residents, with the goal of providing insight for other residency programs that are considering or instituting NF call systems., (Copyright © 2016 The Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada/La Société des obstétriciens et gynécologues du Canada. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Increased rates of delivery by Caesarean section have resulted in a reduction in rates of instrumental deliveries. This has led to a new educational challenge for teaching and development of skills. In teaching trainees, there are subconscious tasks that the supervising staff may not review because they are automatic. This study aimed to create a new tool to meet this challenge: to identify the core steps required to perform a non-rotational forceps delivery safely and successfully., Methods: Labour and delivery nursing staff of three large teaching hospitals were asked to identify clinicians they considered to be particularly skilled in non-rotational forceps deliveries. Obstetricians who were identified consistently in this way were invited to participate in the study. After providing written consent, participants were then filmed performing a non-rotational forceps delivery on a model. Two clinicians reviewed all videos and documented verbal and non-verbal components of the assessment. Thematic analysis combined findings into an integrated summary. The initial summary was then circulated to all participants for their approval., Results: Seventeen clinicians were identified and consented. Themes identified included the need for careful assessment of suitability for operative delivery, the role of the multidisciplinary team, the need for careful and appropriate communication with the parents, the technique of delivery itself, and postpartum care and documentation., Conclusion: In the core steps identified, the clinicians balanced respect for the "elegant technique" of non-rotational forceps deliveries with careful assessment and knowing when to stop if safety criteria were not met.

Objective: Fetal malposition is a common indication for Caesarean section in the second stage of labour. Rotational (Kielland) forceps are a valuable tool in select situations for successful vaginal delivery; however, learning opportunities are scarce. Our aim was to identify the verbal and non-verbal components of performing a safe Kielland forceps delivery through filmed demonstrations by expert practitioners on models to develop a task list for training purposes., Methods: Labour and delivery nurses at three university-affiliated hospitals identified clinicians whom they considered skilled in Kielland forceps deliveries. These physicians gave consent and were filmed performing Kielland forceps deliveries on a model, describing their assessment and technique and sharing clinical pearls based on their experience. Two clinicians reviewed the videos independently and recorded verbal and non-verbal components of the assessment; thematic analysis was performed and a core task list was developed. The algorithm was circulated to participants to ensure consensus., Results: Eleven clinicians were identified; eight participated. Common themes were prevention of persistent malposition where possible, a thorough assessment to determine suitability for forceps delivery, roles of the multidisciplinary team, description of the Kielland forceps and technical aspects related to their use, the importance of communication with the parents and the team (including consent, debriefing, and documentation), and "red flags" that indicate the need to stop when safety criteria cannot be met., Conclusion: Development of a cognitive task list, derived from years of experience with Kielland forceps deliveries by expert clinicians, provides an inclusive algorithm that may facilitate standardized resident training to enhance education in rotational forceps deliveries.

Objective: Ensuring the availability of operative vaginal delivery is one strategy for reducing the rising Caesarean section rate. However, current training programs appear inadequate. We sought to systematically identify the core steps in assessing women in the second stage of labour for safe operative delivery, and to produce an expert task-list to assist residents and obstetricians in deciding on the safest mode of delivery for their patients., Methods: Labour and delivery nursing staff of three large university-associated hospitals identified clinicians they considered to be skilled in operative vaginal deliveries. Obstetricians who were identified consistently were invited to participate in the study. Participants were filmed performing their normal assessment of the second stage of labour on a model. Two clinicians reviewed all videos and documented all verbal and non-verbal components of the assessment; these components were grouped into overarching themes and combined into an integrated expert task-list. The task-list was then circulated to all participants for additional comments, checked against SOGC guidelines, and redrafted, allowing production of a final expert task-list., Results: Thirty clinicians were identified by this process and 20 agreed to participate. Themes identified were assessment of suitability, focused history, physical examination including importance of an abdominal examination, strategies to accurately assess fetal position, station, and the likelihood of success, cautionary signs to prompt reassessment in the operating room, and warning signs to abandon operative delivery for Caesarean section. Communication strategies were emphasized., Conclusion: Having expert clinicians teach assessment in the second stage of labour is an important step in the education of residents and junior obstetricians to improve confidence in managing the second stage of labour.