Search

ECG-gating is necessary for cardiac computed tomography, but is not suitable for arrhythmias, so the aim of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of the ECG-edit function for this purpose.Of 1,221 patients undergoing 64-row multidetector-row computed tomography coronary angiography (coronary MDCT), 123 patients (28 atrial fibrillation (Af), 39 premature atrial contractions (PAC), 42 premature ventricular contractions (PVC), 3 PAC + PVC, 10 sinus arrhythmias (SA), and a second-degree atrioventricular block (2 degrees AVB)) had arrhythmias necessitating the ECG-edit function. Short R-R interval was deleted and mid-diastolic phases were selected from the long R-R intervals using the "R+absolute time" method. In the present study, the reconstructed images were evaluated using a triple-grade scale A-C, representing excellent, acceptable, and unacceptable image quality. Image quality, categorized as A, B and C, respectively, was 50%, 36% and 14% for the 28 patients with Af; 56%, 36% and 8% for the 39 PAC patients, and 65%, 33% and 2% in the 42 PVC patients. None of the scans of the PAC + PVC, SA, and 2 degrees AVB patients was ranked as C.The ECG-edit function is useful for reconstructing coronary MDCT images in many arrhythmias, and provides clinically acceptable images in most cases.

Coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) was performed in 283 patients with atrial fibrillation (Af) using a prospective electocardiogeaphic gated scanning with a manual exposure-termination technique. When preparatory 5-beat scanning contained at least one RR interval longer than 800 ms, 5-beat diastolic scanning (R+800 ms protocol) was selected. When no RR interval longer than 800 ms was observed, 2-beat scanning starting at end-systolic phase (R+210 ms to R protocol) was chosen. In R+800 ms protocol, we manually terminated scanning when motion free real-time reconstruction image was confirmed. R+800 ms protocol was applied in 95% of the cases and required an average of 2 cardiac cycles, providing motion-free images in 91% of the patients. The mean exposure dose was less than that with R+210 ms to R protocol. Using the protocols above, 90% of the all patients with Af provided motion free images and 99% of them were evaluable.

Background: Coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) in patients with pacemaker suffers from metallic lead-induced artifacts, which often interfere with accurate assessment of coronary luminal stenosis. The purpose of this study was to assess a frequency of the lead-induced artifacts and artifact-suppression effect by the single energy metal artifact reduction (SEMAR) technique., Methods: Forty-one patients with a dual-chamber pacemaker were evaluated using a 320 multi-detector row CT (MDCT). Among them, 22 patients with motion-free full data reconstruction images were the final candidates. Images with and without the SMEAR technique were subjectively compared, and the degree of metallic artifacts was compared., Results: On images without SEMAR, severe metallic artifacts were often observed in the right coronary artery (#1, #2, #3) and distal anterior descending branch (#8). These artifacts were effectively suppressed by SEMAR, and the luminal accessibility was significantly improved in #3 and #8., Conclusion: While pacemaker leads often cause metallic-induced artifacts, SEMAR technique reduced the artifacts and significantly improved the accessibility of coronary lumen in #3 and #8.

Background: A clear coronary CT angiography (CCTA) can be obtained when temporal resolution (TR) is shorter than slow filling (SF) duration. The SF duration was calculated by the following equation: SF=-443+0.742 (RR-PQ). Although, the TR of half and full reconstruction using 320-ADCT (0.275 s/r) are known, the TR of automatic patient motion correction (APMC) reconstruction is not clear. The purpose of this study is to clarify the each minimum value of (RR-PQ) for acquiring a clear CCTA that was made by half, full or APMC reconstruction., Method: CCTA was performed in consecutive 345 (M/F=195/150, Age: 69±10 years) patients except for arrhythmia and the final heart rate (controlled by β-blocker) ≥80 bpm using 320-ADCT (Aquilion ONE, 0.275 s/r). In all subjects, 3 CCTAs were generated by half, full, or APMC reconstruction at the same optimal phase. Image quality (A: excellent, B: acceptable, C: poor) was estimated by the consensus of three trained researchers. We classified (RR-PQ) into 15 groups by each 50 ms interval., Results: The A or B % prediction (y) significantly correlated (y=-240.08+0.401x, r=0.98, p=0.0006 in half, y=-238.26+0.378x, r=0.98, p=0.0001 in APMC, and y=-236.84+0.332x, r=0.97, p<0.0001 in full reconstruction) with (RR-PQ) (x), respectively., Conclusion: The minimum values of (RR-PQ) for 95% prediction of A or B image quality were ≥836 ms in half, ≥881 ms in APMC, and ≥998 ms in full reconstruction.

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to validate the clinical usefulness of Advanced Patient Motion Correction (APMC) reconstruction when motion artifacts were observed in a prospective ECG-gated coronary CT angiography (CCTA), which was acquired by low tube current scanning with full reconstruction using 320-row area detector CT (0.275 s/rot.)., Methods: Of 530 consecutive CCTA, we selected 119 patients (M/F: 71/48, Age: 69 ± 11 y, BMI: 23.5 ± 2.5) with (RR-PQ) ≥ 968 ms before scanning, and performed a CCTA with low tube current scanning [30% of usual tube current (30%mA)], adaptive iterative dose reduction 3D, and full reconstruction. Image quality for motion artifacts was subjectively evaluated using a 3-point scale (excellent, acceptable, and unacceptable)., Results: Of 119, 102 CCTA had "excellent" images (group A) and 17 had "acceptable" images (group B). The APMC and half reconstruction were retried in the 17 CCTA with "acceptable" images. Finally, all CCTA became "excellent" images. The RR-PQ of group B during scanning (966 ± 80 ms) was significantly (P = 0.0001) shorter than group A (1,088 ± 123 ms). Each image noise (standard deviation of CT value) of aorta, left atrium, and left ventricle was 21.7 ± 2.3, 24.7 ± 2.3, 24.5 ± 2.4 in full, 25.7 ± 2.2, 29.0 ± 3.4, 28.2 ± 2.7 in APMC, and 30.4 ± 2.8, 34.3 ± 4.2, 33.3 ± 2.9 HU in half reconstruction. Mean dose-length product of all patients was 66.2 ± 34.4 mGy · cm., Conclusion: "Excellent" CCTA images can be obtained in 85.7% of patients with (RR-PQ)≥ 968 ms by full reconstruction. APMC is useful for motion artifacts and image noise reduction when patient' s HR increases during scanning rather than half reconstruction.

Background: It is possible to obtain equivalent image quality and a lower radiation dose using low tube current scanning with full reconstruction as compared to usual tube current scanning with half reconstruction in a 320-row area detector computed tomography (ADCT) angiography., Method: Of 589 patient underwent coronary CT angiography (CCTA), 11 patients with (RR-PQ) ≥1069 ms were enrolled. In those patients, low tube current (50% mA) scanning with full or half reconstruction were performed. As a control, 11 patients with matched pairs of tube voltage, BMI and heart rate who underwent usual scanning with half reconstruction (100% mA with half reconstruction) were selected. Standard deviation of the CT value (SD) was measured in aorta (Ao), left atrium (LA) and left ventricle (LV), and extended dose-length products (DLP.e) were calculated., Result: Significant motion artifact was not observed in any patients. SD of 50% mA with half reconstruction, 50% mA with full reconstruction, and 100% mA with half reconstruction were 28.1±2.6, 20.3±1.9, 20.7±2.5 HU in Ao, 34.4±4.4, 24.9±2.8, 24.9±3.1 HU in LA, and 29.7±2.3, 21.7±1.9, 22.1±2.3 HU in LV, respectively. There were not significant differences between 50% mA with full reconstruction and 100% mA with half reconstruction, but there were significant differences between 50% mA with half reconstruction and 50% mA with full reconstruction in all sites. The DLP.e of 50% mA scanning (74.1±21.8 mGy·cm) was significantly lower than 100% mA scanning (161.9±28.9 mGy·cm)., Conclusion: CCTA with lower radiation dose and equivalent image quality can be obtained by ADCT using 50% mA scanning with full reconstruction in patients with (RR-PQ) ≥1069 ms.

Background: Because coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) by 320-area detector CT (320-ADCT) can be obtained in a short time, the probability of meeting up with premature contraction (PC) during scanning may be lower in 320-ADCT compared to 64-MDCT. The purpose is to compare the probability of meeting up with PC, scanning time, and image quality in patients with PC between the 2 groups (320-ADCT vs 64-MDCT)., Methods: We have never rejected any CCTA examination due to arrhythmias. The 320-ADCT was performed in 2424 consecutive patients to include 70 atrial fibrillations (Afibs) and 64-MDCT in 1905 consecutive patients to include 51 Afibs. After exclusion of the patients with Afibs, we studied the probability of meeting up with PC during scanning and we compared the scanning time, image quality, and reconstruction phase for patients with PC between the 2 groups., Results: The probability of meeting up with PC during scanning in 320-ADCT (2.0%) is significantly lower (P<0.0001) than 64-MDCT (5.6%). For patients with PC, scanning time in 320-ADCT (2.9±0.6 s) was significantly shorter (P<0.0001) than 64-MDCT (9.5±1.9 s) and image quality in 320-ADCT (2.9±0.3 points) was significantly higher (P<0.0001) than 64-MDCT (2.2±0.8 points). CCTA was reconstructed in mid-diastolic phase in 93% of patients with PC using the 320-ADCT with arrhythmia rejection system., Conclusion: The scanning time of 320-ADCT was 1/3 in comparison with that of 64-MDCT, and the probability of meeting up with PC during scanning in 320-ADCT was 1/3 in comparison with that in 64-MDCT.

Background: The image qualities of coronary 64-multidetector-row computed tomography angiography (CCTA) in patients with atrial fibrillation (Afib) are often not enough. This study clarifies how to use electrocardiogram (ECG) -editing in Afib., Methods: We performed CCTA (Aquilion 64 with beam pitch: 0.125, 0.35 s/r) in 33 patients (M/F=24/9, age: 71±9 yr, mean heart rate: 71±12 bpm) with Afib. We injected 5 mg of verapamil into the vein when the mean HR was ≥80 bpm. First, we reconstructed images after deleting short RR (<800, 750, 700, 650, or 600). Second, we reconstructed images in 4 different methods: (1) end-systolic images with Phase Navi (automatically selecting an optimal phase) (ES-Navi), (2) Mid-diastolic images with Phase Navi (MD-Navi), (3) Mid-diastolic images reconstructed by the "R+absolute time method" [Edit-MD (R+)], and (4) Mid-diastolic images reconstructed by the "R-absolute time method" [Edit-MD (R-)]. We reconstructed 1 and 2 without ECG-editing, and 3 and 4 were reconstructed after ECG-editing without a data deficit. The quality of the images was classified into 3 ranks: no artifact (3), mild artifact (2), and severe artifact (1)., Results: The image quality point of CCTA, reconstructed after deleting RR<750, was similar to RR<800, and RR<750 was even higher than that after deleting HR<600, 650, or 700. The mean image quality point of CCTA that was reconstructed by Edit-MD (R-) or Edit-MD (R+) was significantly higher than ES-Navi or MD-Navi., Conclusion: The high image quality of CCTA could be reconstructed after deleting RR<750 in 76% or after deleting RR<800 in 70% of Afib. The reconstruction using Edit-MD (R-) or Edit-MD (R+) without a data deficit could provide a better quality CCTA than using PhaseNavi in Afib.

The purpose of this study is to elucidate the relationship among RR interval (RR), the optimal reconstruction phase, and adequate temporal resolution (TR) to obtain coronary CT angiography images of acceptable quality using 64-MDCT (Aquilion 64) of end-systolic reconstruction in 407 patients with high heart rates. Image quality was classified into 3 groups [rank A (excellent): 161, rank B (acceptable): 207, and rank C (unacceptable): 39 patients]. The optimal absolute phase (OAP) significantly correlated with RR [OAP (ms)=119-0.286RR (ms), r=0.832, p<0.0001], and the optimal relative phase (ORP) also significantly correlated with RR [ORP (%)=62-0.023RR (ms), r=0.656, p<0.0001], and the correlation coefficient of OAP was significantly (p<0.0001) higher than that of ORP. The OAP range (±2SD) in which it is highly possible to get a static image was from [119-0.286RR (ms)-46] to [119-0.286RR (ms)+46]. The TR was significantly different among ranks A (97 ± 22 ms), B (111 ± 31 ms) and C (135 ± 34 ms). The TR significantly correlated with RR in ranks A (TR=-16+0.149RR, r=0.767, p<0.0001), B (TR=-15+0.166RR, r=0.646, p<0.0001), and C (TR=52+0.117RR, r=0.425, p=0.0069). Rank C was distinguished from ranks A or B by linear discriminate analysis (TR=-46+0.21RR), and the discriminate rate was 82.6%. In conclusion, both the OAP and adequate TR depend on RR, and the OAP range (±2SD) can be calculated using the formula [119-0.286RR (ms)-46] to [119-0.286RR (ms)+46], and an adequate TR value would be less than (-46+0.21RR).

The purpose of this study is to estimate radiation dose and image quality of ECG-gated coronary 320-area detector CT (ADCT) angiography which was acquired using the protocols that were considered as optimal methods for different heart rates (HR) in 1031 consecutive patients (M/F=580/451, 65 ± 12 yr) without arrhythmias. We set up 5 protocols for 320-ADCT based on the relationship among heart rates, temporal resolution, gantry rotation speed, optimal reconstruction phase and slow filling phase on 64-multidetector-row computed tomography (MDCT), ie, 1) mid-diastolic (75% of RR) 1 beat scan (MD 1 beat, N=761(73.8%)) for HR ≤ 60, 2) mid-diastolic (75% of RR) 2 beat scan (MD 2 beat, N=135) for 61 ≤ HR ≤ 65, 3) end-systolic and mid-diastolic (37-80% of RR) 2 beat scan (ES-MD 2 beat, N=92) for 66 ≤ HR ≤ 75, 4) end-systolic (R+280-430 ms) 2 beat scan (ES 2 beat, N=21) for 76 ≤ HR ≤ 80, and 5) end-systolic (R+250-400 ms) 3 beat scan (ES 3 beat, N=22) for 81 ≤ HR ≤ 105. Image quality was classified into 3 categories (excellent (3 points), acceptable (2 points), and unacceptable (1 point)). Scanning time, DLP.e and image quality score were 1.4 ± 0.1 s, 220 ± 59 mGy·cm, 3.0 ± 0.2 points in MD 1 beat, 2.2 ± 0.2 s, 434 ± 118 mGy·cm, 2.9 ± 0.3 points in MD 2 beat, 2.1 ± 0.2 s, 729 ± 229 mGy·cm, 2.7 ± 0.5 points in ES-MD 2 beat, 1.9 ± 0.1 s, 432 ± 148 mGy·cm, 2.2 ± 0.6 points in ES 2 beat, and 2.4 ± 0.2 s, 669 ± 152 mGy·cm, 2.3 ± 0.6 points in ES 3 beat respectively. In conclusion, the prospective ECG-gated scan protocol for coronary 320-ADCT angiography in any HR group was considered reasonable and proper for image quality and radiation dose.

Background: A high radiation dose associated with 64 multidetector-row computed tomography (64-MDCT) is a major concern for physicians and patients alike. A new 320 row area detector computed tomography (ADCT) can obtain a view of the entire heart with one rotation (0.35 s) without requiring the helical method. As such, ADCT is expected to reduce the radiation dose. We studied image quality and radiation dose of ADCT compared to that of 64-MDCT in patients with a low heart rate (HR≤60)., Methods: Three hundred eighty-five consecutive patients underwent 64-MDCT and 379 patients, ADCT. Patients with an arrhythmia were excluded. Prospective ECG-gated helical scan with high HP (FlashScan) in 64 was used for MDCT and prospective ECG-gated conventional one beat scan, for 320-ADCT. Image quality was visually evaluated by an image quality score. Radiation dose was estimated by DLP (mGy･cm) for 64-MDCT and DLP.e (mGy･cm) for 320-ADCT., Results: Radiation dose of 320-ADCT (208±48 mGy･cm) was significantly (P<0.0001) lower than that of 64-MDCT (484±112 mGy･cm), and image quality score of 320-ADCT (3.0±0.2) was significantly (P=0.0011) higher than that of 64-MDCT (2.9±0.4). Scan time of 320-ADCT (1.4±0.1 s) was also significantly (P<0.0001) shorter than that of 64-MDCT (6.8±0.6 s)., Conclusions: 320-ADCT can achieve not only a reduction in radiation dose but also a superior image quality and shortening of scan time compared to 64-MDCT.

Background: A low heart rate (HR), associated with a prolonged slow filling phase (SF), is necessary to obtain a high quality coronary CT at a low radiation dose with conventional 64 multidetector-row computed tomography (MDCT). The purpose of our study was to confirm the safety of injecting propranolol (2-10 mg) into the vein for lowering heart rate in patients requiring MDCT and to document the effect of the drug on HR, PQ and SF., Method: Of 1290 consecutive patients who were initially considered for enrollment in the coronary MDCT study, 40 patients with atrial fibrillations, 3 with atrial flutters, and 13 with artificial pacemakers were excluded. Of the remaining 1234 patients (M/F=714/520), 331 had already taken an oral beta-blocker before the CT examination, and were included in the study. In patients with no contraindications, propranolol was aggressively injected (2-10 mg) into the vein to reduce the HR., Result: In patients not taking an oral beta blocker, 2 mg propranolol reduced the HR by -10±5 bpm and 10 mg, by -20±7 bpm. However, in patients taking an oral beta-blocker, the decrease in HR by propranolol was minimal (2 mg, -6±4 bpm; 10 mg, -10±6 bpm). Propranolol significantly prolonged the PQ interval (from 169±27 to 179±29 ms, P<0.0001), and SF (from 125±69 to 264±79 ms, P<0.0001). Adverse effects of propranolol injection were observed in only 3 [2 mild hypotension and 1 paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (recovered to sinus rhythm by DC counter shock)] of 3212 patients. All 3 patients became stable after 1 or 2 hours of rest and could return home., Conclusion: Propranolol injection was a relatively safe and useful method to reduce HR and prolong SF, necessary for obtaining high quality coronary MDCT with a low radiation dose.

Background: Although it is well known that we usually cannot acquire a high quality coronary MDCT in patients with arrhythmia or incomplete breath-hold, we sometimes also cannot obtain a high quality coronary MDCT in patients without arrhythmia or incomplete breath-hold., Purpose: We studied what factors other than arrhythmia or incomplete breath-hold affected image quality., Methods: Coronary MDCT and echocardiography were performed within one month in 2145 patients, and 452 cases of arrhythmia or 102 cases of incomplete breath-hold during scanning were eliminated. The remaining 1591 patients were studied. Those patients were divided into two groups (mid-diastolic phase reconstruction (MD) group (N=1377) and end-systolic phase reconstruction (ES) group (N=214)). Age, body weight, mean heart rate (HR) during scanning, temporal resolution (TR) and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) by echocardiography were estimated. Image quality (A: Excellent (3 points), B: Acceptable (2 points), C: Unacceptable (1 point)) was evaluated., Results: The mean image quality points of the MD group (2.9±0.3) were significantly (P<0.0001) higher than the mean image quality points of the ES group (2.3±0.7), and the mean HR of the MD group (57±6 bpm) was significantly (P<0.0001) lower than that of the ES group (81±15 bpm). In the MD group, HR and TR were selected as significant factors affecting image quality by stepwise regression analysis. In the ES group, TR and HR were selected. In the ES subgroup with HR<90 bpm, TR and HR were selected; however, in the ES subgroup with HR≥90 bpm, TR and LVEF were selected., Conclusion: In the MD group, low HR was important for high quality coronary MDCT. In the ES subgroup with HR<90, short TR and low HR were important; however, in the ES subgroup with HR≥90 bpm, TR and LVEF were more important than HR.

Background: High radiation dose of conventional retrospective ECG-gated coronary MDCT (multidetector computed tomography) with regular helical pitch (HP) continuous scan has disturbed wide clinical use. The purpose was to estimate the radiation dose reduction effects of FlashScan, which was a prospective ECG-gated helical scan with high HP., Method: Coronary MDCT was performed by Aquilion 64 Super Heart (Toshiba) in 474 patients (M/F=280/194, mean age: 65+/-11 years old, mean height: 161+/-10 cm, body weight: 62+/-13 kg, BMI: 23.9+/-3.4) with HR

We proposed a new acquisition method of coronary MDCT achieved by pacing rate resetting and/or propranolol or verapamil injection in patients with a pacemaker. Coronary MDCT was undertaken in 57 patients with a pacemaker (DDD: 51, VVI: 6) and in 2975 patients with sinus rhythm as control using Aquilion 64 (Toshiba). Pacing rate was reset to 60 beats per minute (bpm) in DDD, and spontaneous beats were suppressed by propranolol injection. Pacing rate was reset to 70 bpm in atrial fibrillation with VVI, and spontaneous beats were suppressed by verapamil injection. Coronary MDCT was undertaken using as high a beam pitch (BP) as possible. When spontaneous beats were not suppressed, we selected the optimal gantry speed and BP to get the highest temporal resolution. Image quality makes no significant difference between pacemaker and sinus rhythm. When spontaneous beats were completely suppressed (all pacing), mean radiation dose and acquisition time, respectively, decreased by 33.0% and 35.2% in DDD compared with the method recommended by Heart Navi (by Toshiba), and they decreased by 38.1% and 25.9%, respectively, in VVI compared with the method recommended by Heart Navi. We could not estimate coronary stenosis in the proximal right coronary artery by lead artifacts in 30% of DDD pacemakers. In conclusion, the new method is useful for not only reducing radiation dose and acquisition time, but also for maintaining image quality in patients with a pacemaker.

Helical pitch (HP) usually has been decided automatically by the software (Heart Navi) included in the MDCT machine (Aquilion 64) depending on gantry rotation speed (r) and heart rate (HR). To reduce radiation dose, 255 consecutive patients with low HR (< or =60 bpm) and without arrhythmia underwent cardiac MDCT using high HP. We had already reported that the relationship among r, HP, and the maximum data acquisition time interval (Tmax) does not create the data deficit in arrhythmia. It was represented as Tmax= (69.88/HP-0.64) r; (equation 1). From equation 1, HP=69.88 r/ (Tmax+0.64 r); (equation 2) was derived. We measured the maximum R-R interval (R-Rmax) on ECG before MDCT acquisition, and R-Rmaxx1.1 was calculated as Tmax in consideration of R-Rmax prolongation during MDCT acquisition. The HP of high HP acquisition was calculated from equation 2. In HR< or =50 bpm, Heart Navi determined r: 0.35 sec/rot and HP: 9.8, and in 51 bpm< or =HR< or =66 bpm, r: 0.35 sec/rot and HP: 11.2. HP of the high HP (16.4+/-1.2) was significantly (p<0.0001) higher than that of Heart Navi HP (10.9+/-0.6). The scanning time (6.5+/-0.6 sec) of high HP was significantly (p<0.0001) shorter than that of Heart Navi (9.0+/-0.8 sec), and the dose length product of high HP (675+/-185 mGy x cm) was significantly (p<0.0001) lower than that of Heart Navi (923+/-252 mGy x cm). The high HP could produce fine images in 251/255 patients. In conclusion, the high HP acquisition is useful for reduction of radiation dose and scanning time.

The ECG-edit is necessary in cardiac MDCT in arrhythmias [premature atrial contraction (PAC) or premature ventricular contraction (PVC)]; however, it sometimes results in a data deficit. Therefore, a thinner helical pitch (HP) should be set to avoid data deficits. The thinner helical pitch creates more radiation exposure. The purpose is to optimize HP in PAC or PVC. In a phantom study, an acrylic phantom (10x10x500 mm) was scanned by MDCT (Aquilion 64) using an artificial pacemaker at various gantry rotation speeds (r) and HP. We evaluated the relationships between HP and the maximal table moving length (Lmax) in the border of data deficit, and among r, HP, and the maximum data collection time interval (Tmax). In the clinical study, cardiac MDCT was performed in 44 cases (M/F: 26/18, 71.4+/-10.6yrs) including 30 PAC and 14 PVC using the optimal HP derived from Tmax+10%. In the phantom study, there were significant correlations between HP and Lmax (Lmax=34.94-0.32 HP... (1), r=0.999, P<0.0001), and Tmax [Tmax= (69.88/HP-0.64)xr] was calculated using formula (1). In 42/44 patients, high-quality images were obtained using the optimal HP; however, it resulted in data deficits in 2 patients, because of heart rate decreasing and a couple of PAC during scanning. Optimal HP significantly (P<0.0001) reduced radiation dose (-11.4%) compared with conventional HP. In conclusion, the optimal HP in PAC or PVC was calculated from the phantom study, provided fine images in 95% patients, and could reduce radiation dose.