Search

Purpose of Review: The management of cutaneous melanoma has rapidly progressed over the past decade following the introduction of effective systemic therapies. Given the large number of recent clinical trials which have dramatically altered the management of these patients, an updated review of the current evidence regarding the management of localized melanoma is needed. Recent Findings: The role of effective systemic therapies in earlier stages (I-III) melanoma, both in adjuvant and neoadjuvant settings is rapidly changing the role of surgery in the management cutaneous melanoma, particularly regarding surgical safety margins for wide local excision (WLE), the role of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) and the extent of lymph node dissections. The randomized phase 2 SWOG1801 trial has demonstrated superiority of neoadjuvant-adjuvant anti-PD1 therapy in improving event-free survival by 23% at 2-years over adjuvant anti-PD-1 therapy only. Furthermore, the PRADO trial has suggested a more tailored approach both the extent of surgery as well as adjuvant therapy can safely and effectively be done, depending on the response to initial neoadjuvant immunotherapy. These results await validation and it is expected that in 2024 the phase 3 Nadina trial (NCT04949113) will definitively establish neo-adjuvant combination immunotherapy as the novel standard. This will further redefine the management of localized melanoma. Summary: The use of effective systemic therapies will continue to evolve in the next decade and, together with new emerging diagnostic and surveillance techniques, will likely reduce the extent of routine surgery for stage I-III melanoma. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Endoscopic tattooing of colorectal lesions has been performed employing several markers. The indocyanine green (ICG) that uses near infrared fluorescence technology, has been recently adopted in laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery. This study aims to systematically review the international literature to validate the ICG in laparoscopic colorectal surgery, in order to include the ICG in the therapeutic protocol. Methods: Following AMSTAR 2 criteria, we performed a systematic review to evaluate the use of green indocyanine as a marker for preoperative endoscopic tattooing and for lymph nodes mapping. The study selection was conducted using the PubMed database from January 1989 to July 2022. Results: We identified 25 eligible studies. 13 based on fluorescent tumor localization in laparoscopic colorectal surgery using ICG while 12 of them reported the lymphatic road mapping and sentinel node identification by ICG using a near-infrared camera system. One study analyzed both topics. Conclusions: In laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery indocyanine green can be used to localize fluorescent tumors and mapping fluorescence lymph node. The use of ICG appears to be a valid and safe technique that helps the surgeon to achieve a better oncological radicality. However, the protocols need to be clarified by further studies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Sentinel lymph node (SLN) detection and biopsy is a critical staging component for several cancers. Apart from established methods using dyes or radiolabeled colloids, newer techniques are emerging, like near-infrared fluorescent compounds, targeted molecular radiopharmaceuticals and magnetic nano-tracers. In the overview section of this review, we categorize SLN detection tracers based on their principle of use. We discuss the merits of existing tracers and provide a glimpse of in-development formulations. A subsequent clinical section explores the expanded role of SLN detection in management of various cancers, citing current medical guidelines and the leading conclusions of long-term clinical trials. The concluding section tries to provide a perspective of promising developments and the work required to bring them to clinical fruition. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: In our study of 419 patients with endometrial cancer, we looked at two ways of checking the spread of the disease: one called 'sentinel lymph node biopsy' (SLNB) and the other, a more traditional method called 'lymph node dissection' (LND). We followed these patients for about 5.5 years. We found that both methods had similar outcomes in terms of how long patients lived without the disease coming back (known as disease-free survival) and how long they lived overall (overall survival). Whether patients had their complete lymph nodes checked or only the sentinel did not seem to change how well they did. But we did notice that the kind of treatment they received afterward could affect how they did. Overall, it seems like the newer SLNB method is just as good as the traditional LND in helping patients with endometrial cancer. Background: Recently, sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) has been introduced in the surgical staging of endometrial cancer as an alternative to systematic lymph node dissection (LND). However, the survival impact of SLNB is not yet well characterised. Methods: We performed a retrospective study of 419 patients with endometrial cancer treated with SLNB alone or with pelvic and para-aortic LND. For SLNB mapping, indocyanine green was used. Results: Median follow-up was 66 months. After exclusions, 337 patients were eligible for analysis. Of them, 150 underwent SLNB and 187 LND. During the follow-up time, 27 (24.7%) of the 150 who underwent SLNB and 54 (28.9%) of the 187 who underwent LND were diagnosed with recurrent disease (p = 0.459). The estimated 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) rate was 76.7% and 72.2% for patients in the SLNB and LND group, respectively (p = 0.419). The 5-year overall survival (OS) rates were 80.7% and 77.0% in the SLNB and LND group, respectively (p = 0.895). Survival rates were similar in both groups independent of lymph node status. Multivariable analysis confirmed that the staging approach was not associated with oncological outcome. For patients without lymph node metastases, patient outcome was worsened by advanced tumour stage and non-endometrioid tumour histology. In the group of patients with confirmed lymph node metastases, advanced tumour stage and inadequate adjuvant treatment significantly reduced DFS and OS. Conclusion: Our data suggested that SLNB did not compromise the oncological outcome of patients with endometrial cancer compared to LND. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background Lymph node metastasis is the main determinant of survival in penile cancer patients. Conventionally clinical palpability is used to stratify patients to Inguinal Lymph node dissection (ILND) if clinically node positive (cN +) or Dynamic sentinel node biopsy (DSNB) if clinically node negative (cN0). Studies suggest a false negative rate (FNR) of around 10% (5–13%) for DSNB. To our knowledge there are no studies reporting harder end point of survival and outcomes of all clinically node positive (cN +) patients. We present our outcome data of all patients with penile cancer including false negative rates and survival in both DSNB and ILND groups. Methods One hundred fifty-eight consecutive patients (316 inguinal basins), who had lymph node surgery for penile cancer in a tertiary referral centre from Jan 2008 to 2018, were included in the study. All patients underwent ultrasound (US) ± fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) and then MRI/ CT, if needed, to stage their disease. We used combined clinical and radiological criteria (node size, architecture loss, irregular margins) to stratify patients to DSNB vs ILND as opposed to clinical palpability alone. Results 11.2% i.e., 27/241 inguinal basins had lymph node positive disease by DSNB. 54.9% i.e., 39/71 inguinal basins (IBs) had lymph node-positive disease by ILND. 4 inguinal basins with no tracer uptake in sentinel node scans are being monitored at patient’s request and have not had any recurrences to date. With a mean follow-up of 65 months (range 24–150), the false-negative rate (FNR) for DSNB is 0%. Judicious uses of cross-sectional imaging necessitated ILND in 2 inguinal basins with non-palpable nodes and negative US with false positive rate of 6.3% (2/32) for ILND. The same cohort of DSNB patients might have had 11.1% (3/27) FNR if only palpability criteria was used. 43 (28%) patients who did require cross sectional imaging as per our criteria had a low node positive rate of 4.7% (p = 0.03). Mean cancer specific survival of all node-positive patients was 105 months. Conclusion The performance of DSNB improved with enhanced radiological stratification of patients to either DSNB or ILND. We for the first time report the comprehensive outcome of all lymph node staging procedures in penile cancer.

Background: Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) with injection of radiopharmaceuticals is now the standard of care for staging the axilla in patients with breast cancer. Sulfur or antimony colloids labeled with 99mTechnetium (Tc) are used globally for the procedure, with a detection rate of 94%. However, in Iran, Tc phytate has been used because it is more easily producible in the country. The detection rate with Tc phytate has not been well determined in large-scale studies. Objective: We performed this study to report the detection rate of SLNB with Tc phytate, its advantages and disadvantages using large multicentric data. Methods: This is a retrospective cross-sectional multicenter study. Participants were breast cancer patients without previous history of axillary surgery, who underwent sentinel node biopsy using Tc phytate on the morning of surgery or the day before. The detection rate was calculated as the number of patients with histologically positive sentinel nodes to all patients with histologically positive lymph nodes; we compared those injected on the day of surgery and those injected on the day before. Results: Overall, 2663 women aged 50.2 ± 11.6 years were included. The detection rate was 91.8% (806 out of 878). The false negative rate was 8.2% overall, and statistically similar for injections on the day or the day before surgery (2.9 vs 2.1; P = 0.32). Conclusion: Tc phytate has a good detection rate for breast radio-guided SLNB with similar result for injections on the surgery day or the day before it. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Evaluar mediante linfogammagrafía in vivo y con detección SPECT/TC los patrones de drenaje linfático de los tumores del seno paranasal (SPN). Confirmar o rebatir la creencia de que el ganglio linfático retrofaríngeo (GLRF) se erige en el ganglio de drenaje índice para dichos tumores. Estudio de cohorte prospectivo realizado en pacientes con tumores del SPN no tratados previamente y sin evidencia clínico-radiológica de metástasis a nivel ganglionar. La linfogammagrafía se realizó mediante la inyección peritumoral de sulfuro coloidal marcado con [99m]TcO 4 y asistida por endoscopia nasal. Las inyecciones se clasificaron como anteriores o posteriores en función de una línea vertical que pasaba por el orificio del seno maxilar. Se incluyeron 17 pacientes. La linfogammagrafía identificó satisfactoriamente 17 ganglios centinelas en 15 pacientes, y no pudo evidenciarlo (fracaso de la linfogammagrafía) en 2 pacientes. Se observó que los lugares predominantes de drenaje del ganglio centinela fueron el GLRF (n = 8; 47%) y el nivel I (n = 7; 42%). Se identificó drenaje ocasional en el ganglio periparotídeo (n = 1) y en el nivel II (n = 1). Se observó drenaje linfático contralateral en 2 pacientes (en el nivel I y GLRF, respectivamente). Las inyecciones anteriores drenaron predominantemente hacia el nivel I (6/8) y a GLRF (2/8), mientras que las inyecciones posteriores drenaron predominantemente a GLRF (6/7). El riesgo relativo de que el GLRF fuera identificado como ganglio centinela fue significativamente mayor en las inyecciones administradas posteriormente respecto a las administradas anteriormente (RR: 3,43; IC 95%: 1,0-11,8; p = 0,05). El GLRF es considerado un ganglio de drenaje frecuente asociado a los tumores del seno nasal, y merece su atención rutinaria en todos los casos de tumor del seno nasal. La técnica de SPECT/TC con radiocoloide descrita aquí ofrece una excelente técnica in vivo para explorar y validar con mayores garantías las vías de drenaje linfático de estos tumores. To evaluate by in vivo lymphoscintigraphy and SPECT-CT imaging, the lymphatic drainage patterns of para-nasal sinus (PNS) tumours. To confirm or refute the belief of the retropharyngeal lymph node (RPLN) being the significant draining lymph node for such tumours. Prospective cohort study conducted on previously untreated PNS tumours with no clinico-radiological evidence of lymph node metastasis. Lymphoscintigraphy undertaken by nasal endoscopic assisted peritumoral injection of 99mTc sulphur colloid. Injections were classified as anterior or posterior as per a vertical line along the maxillary sinus ostium. Seventeen patients were included. Lymphoscintigraphy successfully identified 17 sentinel nodes in 15 patients and was unsuccessful (lymphoscintigraphy failure) in 2 patients. Predominant sites of sentinel lymphatic drainage were noted to be the RPLN (n = 8; 47%) and level I (n = 7; 42%). Occasional drainage was identified at the peri-parotid node (n = 1) and at level II (n = 1). Contralateral drainage was noted in 2 patients (level I-1 and RPLN-1). Anterior injections drained predominantly to level I (6/8) and RPLN (2/8), while posterior injections drained predominantly to the RPLN (6/7). The relative risk of RPLN being identified as the sentinel node was significantly higher for posteriorly placed injections than for anteriorly placed injections (RR: 3.43; 95% CI: 1.0-11.8; P =.05). The RPLN is noted as a frequent draining node for sino-nasal tumours and merits routine attention in all sino-nasal tumours. The radio-colloid SPECT-CT technique described here offers an excellent in vivo technique to further explore and validate the lymphatic drainage pathways of these tumours. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Our objective was to investigate the impact of pN0(i+) or pN1mi in HER2-positive breast cancer patients undergoing up-front surgery on their outcomes. Survival was not adversely affected by pN0(i+) and pN1mi in 1771 HER2-positive patients. However, in the case of pT1a-b HER2-positive breast cancers, a negative impact on recurrence-free survival was observed specifically for patients with pN0(i+) and pN1mi diseases, particularly among those with pT1b tumors without adjuvant chemotherapy. Our findings highlight the importance of considering the pN0(i+) and pN1mi status in the decision-making process when discussing trastuzumab-based adjuvant chemotherapy for these patients. (1) Background: The independent negative prognostic value of isolated tumor cells or micro-metastases in axillary lymph nodes has been established in triple-negative breast cancers (BC). However, the prognostic significance of pN0(i+) or pN1mi in HER2-positive BCs treated by primary surgery remains unexplored. Therefore, our objective was to investigate the impact of pN0(i+) or pN1mi in HER2-positive BC patients undergoing up-front surgery on their outcomes. (2) Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 23,650 patients treated in 13 French cancer centers from 1991 to 2013. pN status was categorized as pN0, pN0(i+), pN1mi, and pNmacro. The effect of pN0(i+) or pN1mi on outcomes was investigated both in the entire cohort of patients and in pT1a-b tumors. (3) Results: Of 1771 HER2-positive BC patients included, pN status distributed as follows: 1047 pN0 (59.1%), 60 pN0(i+) (3.4%), 118 pN1mi (6.7%), and 546 pN1 macro-metastases (30.8%). pN status was significantly associated with sentinel lymph node biopsy, axillary lymph node dissection, age, ER status, tumor grade, and size, lymphovascular invasion, adjuvant systemic therapy (ACt), and radiation therapy. With 61 months median follow-up (mean 63.2; CI 95% 61.5–64.9), only pN1 with macro-metastases was independently associated with a negative impact on overall, disease-free, recurrence-free, and metastasis-free survivals in multivariate analysis. In the pT1a-b subgroup including 474 patients, RFS was significantly decreased in multivariate analysis for pT1b BC without ACt (HR 2.365, 1.04–5.36, p = 0.039) and for pN0(i+)/pN1mi patients (HR 2.518, 1.03–6.14, p = 0.042). (4) Conclusions: Survival outcomes were not adversely affected by pN0(i+) and pN1mi in patients with HER2-positive BC. However, in the case of pT1a-b HER2-positive BC, a negative impact on RFS was observed specifically for patients with pN0(i+) and pN1mi diseases, particularly among those with pT1b tumors without ACt. Our findings highlight the importance of considering the pN0(i+) and pN1mi status in the decision-making process when discussing trastuzumab-based ACt for these patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Non-visualization of sentinel node (nv-SN) in breast cancer patients with clinically negative axilla (using radiolabeled colloid and or blue dye) is associated with less favorable survival than visualized nodes (v-SN). The reasons for nv-SN could be improper mapping technique or patient plus disease related factors like obesity, large tumor or extensive nodal disease. Regular clinical audit of facilities performing SN mapping is important to mitigate the avoidable technical factor of non-visualization of sentinel node. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Lymph node metastasis is the main determinant of survival in penile cancer patients. Conventionally clinical palpability is used to stratify patients to Inguinal Lymph node dissection (ILND) if clinically node positive (cN +) or Dynamic sentinel node biopsy (DSNB) if clinically node negative (cN0). Studies suggest a false negative rate (FNR) of around 10% (5–13%) for DSNB. To our knowledge there are no studies reporting harder end point of survival and outcomes of all clinically node positive (cN +) patients. We present our outcome data of all patients with penile cancer including false negative rates and survival in both DSNB and ILND groups. Methods: One hundred fifty-eight consecutive patients (316 inguinal basins), who had lymph node surgery for penile cancer in a tertiary referral centre from Jan 2008 to 2018, were included in the study. All patients underwent ultrasound (US) ± fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) and then MRI/ CT, if needed, to stage their disease. We used combined clinical and radiological criteria (node size, architecture loss, irregular margins) to stratify patients to DSNB vs ILND as opposed to clinical palpability alone. Results: 11.2% i.e., 27/241 inguinal basins had lymph node positive disease by DSNB. 54.9% i.e., 39/71 inguinal basins (IBs) had lymph node-positive disease by ILND. 4 inguinal basins with no tracer uptake in sentinel node scans are being monitored at patient's request and have not had any recurrences to date. With a mean follow-up of 65 months (range 24–150), the false-negative rate (FNR) for DSNB is 0%. Judicious uses of cross-sectional imaging necessitated ILND in 2 inguinal basins with non-palpable nodes and negative US with false positive rate of 6.3% (2/32) for ILND. The same cohort of DSNB patients might have had 11.1% (3/27) FNR if only palpability criteria was used. 43 (28%) patients who did require cross sectional imaging as per our criteria had a low node positive rate of 4.7% (p = 0.03). Mean cancer specific survival of all node-positive patients was 105 months. Conclusion: The performance of DSNB improved with enhanced radiological stratification of patients to either DSNB or ILND. We for the first time report the comprehensive outcome of all lymph node staging procedures in penile cancer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Objectives: The sentinel node (SN) concept allowed the selection of pN+ breast cancer (BC) patients to undergo complete axillary dissection (AD). However, the majority do not have additional axillary nodes involved. Therefore, some centres developed clinical decision rules (CDR), based on clinical and pathology variables, to assist in the decision to perform AD. The aim of our study was to evaluate the CDR of the Breast Center of the Centro Hospitalar Universitário São João in Porto (CHUSJ) and to compare its results with the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group (ACOSOG) Z0011 trial criteria. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of a consecutive series of SN-positive BC patients, treated between 2012 and 2019. Results: Among the 418 included patients, 173 (41.4%) were submitted to AD and 245 (58.6%) were spared. In the group submitted to AD, additional positive non-sentinel nodes (NSN) were found in 89 patients (51.4%). In the group spared to AD, two patients (0.8%) had an axillary lymph node recurrence. Conclusions: In BC patients with a positive SN, applying the CHUSJ-CDR reduced the rate of AD to 41.4%, lowering arm and shoulder morbidity caused by this invasive procedure while maintaining a reduced probability of regional recurrence. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The prognostic value of sentinel node biopsy (SNB) is well established and SNB was therefore adopted as a requirement for pathological staging of melanomas>1 mm thick in the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) 8th edition. Consequently, a negative SNB status became an eligibility criterion for clinical trials of adjuvant systemic therapy in resected stage IIB/C melanoma. However, since the Keynote 716 trial demonstrated an improvement in relapse-free survival (RFS) in patients with Stage IIB/C melanoma, all of whom had SNB staging, some have argued that SNB is no longer required for patients with T3 and T4 primary melanomas. The rationale for omitting SNB is that these patients will be able to access adjuvant immunotherapy regardless of SNB status, avoiding the costs and potential complications of SNB. However, this argument overlooks the prognostic value of knowing a patient's nodal status and the therapeutic benefit of SNB in regional disease control. Based on extrapolation of data from multiple sources, we demonstrate that the risk of regional node-field relapse with SNB and immunotherapy for T3b and T4 melanomas is around 7–9% but is 20–27% without SNB. Similarly, the node-field recurrence rate with SNB alone is around 14% compared to around 40% with no SNB or immunotherapy. Consequently, in the absence of prospective data, we propose that the optimal management of the regional node-field for high-risk T3b and T4 primary melanomas is likely to be achieved by combining SNB and adjuvant immunotherapy for those patients who are suitable, rather than either treatment alone. • Regional node recurrence risk ∼40% without sentinel node biopsy or immunotherapy. • Risk lowered to ∼27% with adjuvant immunotherapy alone. • Risk lowered to ∼14% with sentinel node biopsy alone. • Risk lowered to ∼9% with both adjuvant immunotherapy and sentinel node biopsy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Secondary lymphedema is caused by damage to the lymphatic system, often following an oncological tumor removal intervention, or even by an accident. The diagnosis of lymphedema is not easy, because the disease can also be confused with other clinical manifestations (for example, venous insufficiency edema), though an experienced Lymphologist is usually able to diagnose it with good accuracy. To confirm the diagnosis, it is often necessary to resort to specialist imaging tests for an anatomo-functional definition of the pathology. Among these, lymphoscintigraphy is confirmed as the “gold standard” procedure for the diagnosis of lymphedema. Lymphoscintigraphy has been included in the Italian Guidelines by the Ministry of Health.

Abstract Background Results of IBCSG‐23‐01‐trial which included breast cancer patients with involved sentinel nodes (SN) by isolated‐tumor‐cells or micro‐metastases supported the non‐inferiority of completion axillary‐lymph‐node‐dissection (cALND) omission. However, current data are considered insufficient to avoid cALND for all patients with SN‐micro‐metastases. Methods To investigate the impact of cALND omission on disease‐free‐survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS), we analyzed a cohort of 1421 patients

Background: Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is an aggressive malignancy of presumed neuroendocrine origin. Most case series of MCC are limited by low case numbers and are not specific to head and neck tumours. The purpose of this study was to provide a focused review of head and neck MCC diagnosis and management in a single Irish institution. Methods: Patient's demographics, tumour characteristics, pathological diagnosis, surgical treatment, adjuvant treatment, subsequent management and clinical course were collected. Estimates of progression-free MCC survival rates were calculated by the Kaplan–Meier statistical model. A Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient examined the association between surgical margins and disease-free follow-up. Results: In total, 11 patients were treated for head and neck MCC with a mean age of 79.6 years (range = 69–91 years). The mean average follow-up duration of patients was 18.3 months. Of the cohort, 18% (n=2) had a sentinel node biopsy (SLNB). A selective neck dissection was subsequently performed in 18% (n=2). In total, 72% (n=8) of patients received adjuvant radiotherapy. Median disease-specific survival was 15 months for the SLNB group and 17 months for the non-SLNB group, not statistically significant (p=0.23). There was no significant association between surgical margins and disease-free follow (p=0.65). Conclusions: Our case series adds to a limited body of evidence of head and neck MCC. Surgery remains the treatment priority in localized disease, with an increasing role of SLNB for accurate prognostication and staging. Early management of stage I disease results in moderate long-term disease-free survivability.

Background: The optimal limits of the bilateral pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) template in bladder cancer treatment remain controversial. This study aimed to investigate whether radio-guided sentinel node (SLN) detection is a reliable technique for the perioperative localisation of potential lymphatic metastasis during cystectomy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). Materials and Methods: We studied 54 patients with pT2-pT4 MIBC who underwent cystectomy with extended PLND (ePLND) augmented by the SLN technique. The identification of SLN was performed by preoperative SPECT/CT hybrid lymphoscintigraphy using peritumoral injection of nanocolloid-Tc-99m, followed by intraoperative navigation with a handheld γ-probe. All nodal specimens were collected separately and then fixed in formalin, stained with haematoxylin and eosin, and examined by an experienced uropathologist. Results: A total of 1414 LNs were resected and examined for the presence of metastases. The mean number of harvested LNs was 26 (range: 11–50) per patient. In 51 of 54 patients, 192 SLNs were resected. In addition, 20/192 (10.4%) SLNs were located outside of the ePLND area. Overall, 72 metastatic LNs (LN+) were found in 22 of 54 patients (40.7%) and in 24/192 SLNs (12.5%). The SLN technique detected LN+ in 14 of 22 (64%) patients. The SLNs were the only sites of metastasis (SLN+ = LN+) in 6 of 22 (27.3%) LN+ patients, including two cases with foci located in the pararectal region. The diagnostic values for the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and false-negative rate for the SLN technique were 66.66%, 4.16%, 28.57%, and 33.33%, respectively. Extended lymphadenectomy and its combination with the SLN technique enabled the correct assessment in 96.3 and 100% of patients, respectively. Conclusions: The combination of ePLND and SLN provides a better pN assessment compared to ePLND alone. Although the SLN technique has restrictions that limit its diagnostic value, its use as an addition to lymphadenectomy allows for the visualisation of nonstandard lymph drainage pathways that may be potential metastatic routes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose Optimal axillary staging after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in node-negative breast cancer is an area of controversy. Sentinel node biopsy with Technetium-sulphur colloid (99m Tc) alone or with blue dye is the recommended technique for evaluating axilla in these patients. However, this technique has drawbacks such as limited access to nuclear departments and timing limitations related to Tc injection exposing patients to unnecessary radiation. Superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles (SPIO) may represent a valid option for SLN biopsy. In this study, we assessed the feasibility of the magnetic technique (Sentimag) with combination of isosulfan blue dye in breast cancer patients who received NAC. Methods The study sample consisted of 54 female breast cancer patients who received NAC. Sentinel node localization was performed using magnetic technique and blue dye. Sentinel node identification rate (IFR) of magnetic technique was calculated and postoperative complications were assessed. Results Sentinel lymph node was detected in 52 patients with Sentimag method (identification rate = 96.3%, 95% CI: 87.4–98.9%). Blue dye was successful to find SLN in 38 patients (identification rate = 70%). The most common histologic type was invasive ductal (n = 51; 94.4%). Mean tumor size was 2.1 cm after NAC. Most of patients had T2 (n = 30; 55.5%) and HER2 + positive (n = 49; 90.7%) cancer. Conclusion Sentimag which is a magnetic technique appears to be safe, easy to perform with minimal adverse effects, may be an alternative and accurate technique in patients with NAC, especially in breast units where nuclear medicine unit is not available. Supplemental data for this article is available online at https://doi.org/10.1080/08941939.2022.2038737 .

Background: Results of IBCSG‐23‐01‐trial which included breast cancer patients with involved sentinel nodes (SN) by isolated‐tumor‐cells or micro‐metastases supported the non‐inferiority of completion axillary‐lymph‐node‐dissection (cALND) omission. However, current data are considered insufficient to avoid cALND for all patients with SN‐micro‐metastases. Methods: To investigate the impact of cALND omission on disease‐free‐survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS), we analyzed a cohort of 1421 patients <75 years old with SN‐micro‐metastases who underwent breast conservative surgery (BCS). We used inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) to obtain adjusted Kaplan–Meier estimators representing the experience in the analysis cohort, based on whether all or none had been subject to cALND omission. Results: Weighted log‐rank tests comparing adjusted Kaplan–Meier survival curves showed significant differences in OS (p‐value = 0.002) and borderline significant differences in DFS (p‐value = 0.090) between cALND omission versus cALND. Cox's regression using stabilized IPTW evidenced an average increase in the risk of death associated with cALND omission (HR = 2.77, CI95% = 1.36–5.66). Subgroup analyses suggest that the rates of recurrence and death associated with cALND omission increase substantially after a large period of time in the half sample of women less likely to miss cALND. Conclusions: Using IPTW to estimate the causal treatment effect of cALND in a large retrospective cohort, we concluded cALND omission is associated with an increased risk of recurrence and death in women of <75 years old treated by BCS in the absence of a large consensus in favor of omitting cALND. These results are particularly contributive for patients treated by BCS where cALND omission rates increase over time. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Vulval cancer is a rare gynaecological cancer, predominantly seen in postmenopausal women. It accounts for about 4% of gynaecological malignancies. Most women present with vulval symptoms such as a painful lump, ulcer or itching, although some may be asymptomatic. It should be managed in experienced cancer centres where relevant expertise and experience is available to provide multidisciplinary, individualized care. Wide local excision of the lesion, usually with surgical staging of groin nodes through separate incisions is recommended for early disease. Locally advanced vulval cancers require complex and highly individualized treatment, which may be a combination of radical excision with reconstruction with or without radiotherapy. Sentinel lymph node assessment for staging is now standard of care, replacing en-bloc inguinofemoral lymphadenectomy for surgical staging of smaller, early-stage tumours, and groin dissection is omitted in these women if sentinel node biopsy is negative (GROINSS-V I study). Recent GROINSS-V II study has shown that radiotherapy is a safe alternative in patients with sentinel lymph node micro metastases (≤2 mm) with low groin recurrence rate and lower treatment-related morbidity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) has emerged as an accurate tool to identify lymph node metastases in patients with cervical cancers. This procedure is generally performed by conventional or robotic-assisted laparoscopy, but SLNB by transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) has been described for the surgical staging of endometrial cancer. This transvaginal approach seems to be associated with reduced surgical morbidities and could be of particular interest in managing cancer patients. In this article, we report the use of a retroperitoneal vNOTES approach to perform SLNB in a patient with cervical cancer, and we provide a step-by-step description of the surgical technique. This surgical approach seems to be the least invasive way to perform pelvic SLNB and could represent a valuable approach to properly managing patients with early-stage cervical cancers after a free-margin conization. However, more studies are needed before expanding the use of this surgical approach outside study settings.

To investigate the safety of sentinel node mapping for patients with early-stage cervical cancer undergoing cervical conization plus nodal evaluation. The ETERNITY project is a retrospective, multi-institutional study collecting data of patients with early-stage cervical cancer undergoing fertility-sparing treatment. Here, we compared outcomes related to three methods of nodal assessment: sentinel node mapping (SNM), SNM plus backup lymphadenectomy (SNM + LND); pelvic lymphadenectomy (LND). Charts of 123 patients (with stage IA1-IB1 cervical cancer) were evaluated. Median patients' age was 34 (range, 22–44) years. SNM, SNM + LND, and LND were performed in 32 (26 %), 31 (25.2 %), and 60 (48.8 %) patients, respectively. Overall, eight (6.5 %) patients were diagnosed with positive nodes. Two (3.3 %), three (9.7 %), and three (9.4 %) patients were detected in patients who had LND, SNM + LND, and SNM respectively. Considering the 63 patients undergoing SNM (31 SNM + LND and 32 SNM alone), macrometastases, micrometastases, and isolated tumor cells were detected in four (3.2 %), three (2.4 %), and one (0.8 %) patients, respectively. All patients with positive nodes discontinued the fertility sparing treatment. Other two patients (one (1.7 %) in the LND group and one (3.1 %) in the SNM group) required hysterectomy even after negative nodal evaluation. After a median follow-up of 53.6 (range, 1.3, 158.0) months, nine (7.3 %) and two (1.6 %) patients developed cervical and pelvic nodes recurrences, respectively. Disease-free (p = 0.332, log-rank test) and overall survival (p = 0.769, log-rank test) were similar among groups. In this retrospective experience, SNM upholds long-term oncologic effectiveness of LND, reducing morbidity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To determine the incidence and types of complications after dynamic sentinel node biopsy (DSNB) in patients with penile cancer (PeCa) and identify risk factors for the occurrence of postoperative complications. Patients and Methods: We evaluated 644 patients with PeCa (1284 DSNB procedures) with at least one clinically node negative (cN0) groin who underwent DSNB between 2011 and 2020 at a single high‐volume centre. The 30‐ and 30–90‐day postoperative complications were collected according to the modified Clavien–Dindo classification and the standardised methodology proposed by the European Association of Urology panel. Uni‐ and multivariable generalised linear mixed models were used to identify risk factors for the occurrence of complications per groin. Results: A 30‐day postoperative complication occurred in 14% of groins (n = 186), of which 94% were mild to moderate. Wound infection and lymphocele formation were most common. A 30–90‐day postoperative complication occurred in 3.4% of the groins, all of which were mild or moderate (Grade I–II). The number of removed lymph nodes (LNs) per groin was the main independent predictor for any 30‐day complications and Grade ≥II complications (odds ratio 1.40; P < 0.001). There was an increase in the probability of postoperative complications with the number of LNs removed after accounting for all confounders. Conclusions: Despite being less morbid than (modified) inguinal LN dissection, DSNB is still associated with a considerable risk of postoperative mild‐to‐moderate complications. This risk increases with increasing number of LNs removed. Further procedural refinement aimed at removing the true sentinel node(s) only, may help further reduce the morbidity of surgical staging in PeCa. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Οbjective: This study aimed at comparing survival outcomes between systematic axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) vs sentinel lymph node and axillary lymph node dissection only if sentinel positive (SLN ± ALND) in early-stage, clinically node-negative breast cancer patients. Μethods: A systematic review and meta-analysis adhered to PRISMA guidelines was performed. Included studies were prospective randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing survival outcomes of ALND vs. SLN ± ALND in early-stage, node-negative breast cancer patients. Patients enrolled were only those with tumor size lower than 4 cm, clinically negative nodes and treated with breast-conservative surgery. Primary endpoints were locoregional recurrence, overall death and cancer-related death. Results: There were four studies included in the analysis, enrolling overall 2982 patients, of which 1494 in ALND arm and 1488 in the SLN ± ALND arm. No statistically significant difference was observed in locoregional recurrence, breast cancer-related death and overall death. Locoregional recurrence was observed in 2.8% (ALND) vs. 4.1% (SLND ± ALND), (RR 0.69, 95% CI 0.20–2.30). Overall death rate was 7.0% vs. 6.8% respectively, (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.73–1.39, I2 = 28.7%). Breast cancer-related death was 3.6% vs. 3.5%, respectively (SLN ± ALND), (RR 1.11, 95% CI 0.70–1.78, I2 = 0%). No statistically significant difference was observed in any of secondary study outcomes. Conclusions: Systematic axillary axillary lymph node dissection provides no survival benefit compared with sentinel lymph node dissection for early-stage clinically node-negative breast cancer patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Sentinel node biopsy is a key procedure to predict prognosis in melanoma. In a prospective study we compare reporting on melanoma cell densities in cytospin preparations with semiquantitative histopathology for predicting outcome. Sentinel nodes from 900 melanoma patients were bisected. One half of each node was disaggregated mechanically. The melanoma cell density (number of HMB45 positive cells per million lymphocytes with at least one cell showing morphological features of a melanoma cell) was recorded after examining two cytospins. For the second half the maximum diameter of metastasis was determined after haematoxylin and eosin (H&E) and immunohistological staining of three slides. Cytospins were positive for melanoma in 218 of 900 patients (24%). Routine pathology was positive in 111 of 900 (12%) patients. A more extensive pathological workup in cytospin-only positive patients led to a revised diagnosis (from negative to positive) in 23 of 101 patients (22.7%). We found a moderate but significant correlation between melanoma cell densities (determined in cytospins) and the maximum diameter of metastasis (determined by pathology) (rho = 0.6284, p < 0.001). At a median follow-up of 37 months (IQR 25–53 months) melanoma cell density (cytospins) (p < 0.001), thickness of melanoma (p = 0.008) and ulceration status (p = 0.026) were significant predictors for melanoma specific survival by multivariable testing and were all confirmed as key predictive factors by the random forest model. Maximum diameter of metastases, age and sex were not significant by multivariable testing (all p > 0.05). Recording melanoma cell densities by examining two cytospins accurately predicts melanoma outcome and outperforms semiquantitative histopathology. • Melanoma cell densities in the sentinel node accurately reflect melanoma outcome. • Quantitative immunocytology outperforms semiquantitative pathology. • Pathological examination may be restricted to qualitative examination of few slides. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Approval of adjuvant anti-programmed cell death protein 1 therapy for pathologic stage IIB/C cutaneous melanoma has led some to question the role of sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy in the clinical stage IIB/C disease.Objective: To determine the prognostic significance of SLN staging on disease-specific survival (DSS) for clinical stage IIB/C primary cutaneous melanoma in the preimmunotherapy era.Methods: A retrospective cohort study was performed evaluating patients who underwent excision of clinical stage IIB/C cutaneous melanoma using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (2004-2011). Patients who did and did not undergo SLN biopsy were compared using propensity matching, and among those who underwent SLN biopsy, matched patients were further stratified by SLN status (SLN positive [SLN+] or SLN negative [SLN-]).Results: Of the 8562 patients evaluated, 6021 (70.3%) underwent SLN biopsy. SLN positivity was associated with significantly reduced 5-year DSS among matched patients who underwent SLN biopsy (47.1% SLN+ vs 75.5% SLN-; P < .001). Five-year DSS remained significantly different across matched T-stages: T3b (54.2% SLN+ vs 64.8% SLN-; P = .004), T4a (55.5% SLN+ vs 71.6% SLN-; P = .001), and T4b (38.6% SLN+ vs 60.9% SLN-; P < .001).Limitations: Retrospective study.Conclusion: For patients with clinical stage IIB/C cutaneous melanoma, SLN status provides essential prognostic information. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Sentinel node biopsy in vulvar cancer is associated with much less morbidity than inguinofemoral node dissection. Our study focused on describing the morphology of superficial lymphatic drainage of the vulva and its relationship to regional nodes, which may facilitate orientation during surgery. Materials and methods: In 24 female cadavers, injections of patent blue (at various localisations medially, unilaterally and bilaterally) were used to visualise the lymphatic drainage of the vulva. After dissection of lymphatic vessels and nodes, their course was documented by photograph and then analysed. Subsequently, a map of vulvar superficial lymphatics was created. Results: The cutaneous and subcutaneous tissue of the vulva primarily drained to superficial inguinal nodes. There was no evidence of a solitary lymph node that drained the unilateral vulva. Each area of the vulva drained to its own lymph node, which was variably localised in the subcutaneous groin around the great saphenous vein. Anastomoses between individual inguinal superficial lymph nodes are likely. Right-left symmetry in the course of lymphatic collectors was not detected. Natural drainage of the medial and paramedial areas to contralateral inguinal nodes was also not detected. The drainage pattern to ipsilateral inguinal nodes was consistent in cadavers without evidence of vulvar disease and may be applicable in the early stages of vulvar cancer. Conclusions: There was no evidence of a solitary node that drained the unilateral vulva. Each part of the vulva may drain to a corresponding lymph node in a different localisation of the groin. The surgeon should take this variability into account. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Sentinel lymph node mapping in patients with axillary breast carcinoma is technically challenging and poorly described in the literature. We report a patient with primary ectopic breast carcinoma of the axilla in whom concurrent peri‐tumoral and intra‐tumoral injection of radionuclide tracer allowed for identification and biopsy of sentinel lymph nodes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Estudiar la viabilidad y utilidad de la técnica combinada biopsia selectiva de ganglio centinela (BSGC)-biopsia radioguiada del ganglio patológico en pacientes con cáncer de mama y afectación axilar sometidas a quimioterapia neoadyuvante (QTNA). Estudio prospectivo en el que se incluyeron 30 pacientes con cáncer de mama y estadificación axilar cN1, con indicación de QTNA. El ganglio biopsiado se marcó (GBM) mediante un clip, antes del tratamiento QTNA. Tras completar este se valoró la respuesta axilar con ecografía. En caso de buena respuesta ecográfica se procedió a realizar BSGC (99mTc-nanocoloides) y disección axilar dirigida mediante biopsia radioguiada del GBM (99mTc-macroagregados albúmina). Se procedía a realizar una linfadenectomía axilar si el ganglio centinela (GC) y/o el GBM contenían células tumorales. Se evaluaron las tasas de localización-exéresis del GC y del GBM. También se evaluaron la tasa de falsos negativos y el valor predictivo positivo de la BSGC sola. Se extirpó el GC en todas las pacientes, mientras que el GBM se extirpó exitosamente en 27 (90%). El GC coincidió con el GBM en 15 pacientes (50%). En 12 pacientes el GC fue negativo pero el GBM fue positivo para metástasis, lo que comportó una tasa de falsos negativos del 44,4% y un valor predictivo positivo del 37% para la BSGC sola. Tanto el GC como el GBM resultaron negativos en 5 pacientes (18,5%), lo que permitió evitar realizarles la linfadenectomía axilar. La técnica combinada descrita BSGC-biopsia radioguiada del ganglio patológico es un procedimiento útil y accesible para la reestadificación precisa de la axila tras QTNA, evitando la alta tasa de falsos negativos de la BSGC sola en este grupo de pacientes y evitando un número mayor de linfadenectomías axilares. To study the feasibility and usefulness of the combined technique selective sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB)-radioguided biopsy of the pathological lymph node in patients with breast cancer and axillary involvement undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). Prospective diagnostic study of 30 patients with breast cancer and cN1 axillary staging with NACT indication. Before NACT, the biopsied node was marked with a clip (MBN). After NACT an ultrasound was performed and in case of good response a SLNB (99mTc-nanocolloids) plus targeted axillary dissection MBN pathologic node radioguided biopsy (99mTc-albumin macroaggregates) was performed. Axillary lymph node dissection was performed if SLNB and/or MBN were positive for tumor cells. The localization-removal rate of the sentinel lymph node (SLN) and MBN were evaluated. False-negative rate and positive predictive value of SLNB alone were also evaluated. Thirty patients were included in the study. SLN could be detected in all patients while MBN was successfully removed in 27 (90%). The SLN coincided with MBN in 15 patients (50%). In 12 patients SLNB was negative while MBN positive, leading to a FNR of 44,4% for SLNB alone. We found a positive predictive value of 37% for the SLNB. In 5 patients (18,5%) both SLNB and MBN were negative, avoiding axillary lymph node dissection. SLNB-MBN radioguided biopsy combined technique is a useful and accessible procedure for accurate axillary restaging after NACT, avoiding the high rate of false-negative rate of SLNB alone in this group of patients and avoiding a great number of axillary lymph node dissection. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]