Search

This article discusses the technique of single-port endoscopic removal of forehead osteoma, which is a benign tumor lesion that can cause cosmetic concerns for patients. Traditionally, open approaches or large incisions were made to remove forehead osteoma, resulting in visible scars and potential nerve injury. However, otolaryngologists have the necessary skills for this procedure and can achieve complete tumor removal and excellent cosmetic outcomes using endoscopic visualization. The technique involves making a small incision in the hairline, performing subperiosteal dissection, and using drilling to remove the osteoma. The procedure has been shown to have high success rates and low surgical morbidity. [Extracted from the article]

Objectives: Due to the complexity and variety of the frontal recess and sinus anatomy, traditional Draf 2a frontal sinus surgery is challenging. The thickness of the nasofrontal beak and anterior–posterior dimensions of the frontal recess contribute to this complexity. Carolyn's window technique eliminates the limitation of anterior–posterior depth to facilitate a Draf 2a frontal sinusotomy. The approach is a 0° endoscope technique and provides an excellent view of the frontal sinus and recess. We describe Carolyn's window approach to frontal sinus surgery and the perioperative outcomes. Methods: Consecutive adult patients in whom Carolyn's window technique was applied for frontal sinus dissection as part of the endoscopic management of both inflammatory and neoplastic disease were assessed. The primary outcome was frontal sinus patency. Secondary outcomes were surgical morbidity, defined as early (<90 days) or late (>90 days). Results: Forty‐five patients (49.1 ± 17.9 years, 48.9% Female) were assessed. All patients had successful frontal sinus patency (100% [95CI: 92.1%–100%]). Morbidities were adhesion (4.8%), crusting (2.4%), pain (1.2%), and bleeding (1.2%) in the early postoperative period. There were no other morbidities in the early and late postoperative periods. Conclusion: Carolyn's window approach to frontal sinusotomy is a technique that evolves from previously described approaches. Successful frontal sinus patency with very low morbidities is achieved while still working with a 0° endoscope. The "axillectomy" performed simplifies frontal recess surgery by removing the anteroposterior diameter limitation and the dexterity required in angled endoscopy and instrumentation. The inferior‐based lateral wall mucosal flap and free mucosal grafting expedite the mucosal healing process. Laryngoscope, 133:2496–2501, 2023 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Access to the anterior, lateral, inferior, and inferomedial maxillary sinus has been a limitation of the middle meatal antrostomy. Expanded techniques such as the modified medial maxillectomy provide access to many of these areas but require remucosalization, and crusting can occur during the recovery phase. The prelacrimal approach (PLA) offers direct 0° endoscope access to these areas. Additionally, PLA can preserve the nasolacrimal duct and mucosal coverage. Objectives: We describe the current surgical technique and outcomes of PLA patients. Methods: Consecutive adult patients with pathology addressed by PLA to the maxillary sinus were assessed. The primary outcome was the restoration of the lateral wall, and the secondary outcomes were early (< 90 days) and late morbidity (> 90 days). Results: Forty patients (52.8 ± 17 years, 62.5% female) were assessed. All patients had successful restoration of the lateral nasal wall (100% [95CI: 91.2%-100%]). The complications reported were primarily dysesthesia (early 10% and late 2.5%). Conclusion: The PLA provides robust access to the anterior, lateral, inferior, and inferomedial maxilla. PLA offers rapid mucosal recovery while preserving the normal physiology and the lacrimal systems with low morbidity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Nasal airway surgery is often applied when treatment fails to relieve nasal obstruction. However, surgery that improves airflow does not always alleviate the symptoms of nasal obstruction. The perception of nasal breathing is likely more related to changes in mucosal temperature than the mechanical sensation of flow or pressure. This study aims to measure intranasal mucosal temperature pre-and post-surgery using endonasal thermal imaging, exploring its correlation with subjective nasal breathing and objective airflow measurements.A prospective study of adult patients with nasal obstruction managed with nasal airway surgery was performed. Intranasal mucosal temperatures were determined using the thermal endonasal image of the nasal passage produced by the infrared radiometric thermal camera (FILR VS290). A comparison was made between the mean values of mid-expiration (ExT) and mid-inspiration (InT) temperature data (internal nasal valve, nasal cavity, inferior turbinate, and overall airway [mean value]) and visual analog scale (VAS), Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) scale and nasal airway resistance (NAR) before and after surgery.Seven patients (35.14 ± 16.45 years, 57.14% female) were included. All NOSE, VAS, and NAR improved after surgery (59.29 ± 10.89 vs 17.14 ± 14.64; P < .001, 64.50 ± 26.79 vs 18.57 ± 19.99; P < .001, 0.82 ± 0.48 vs 0.34 ± 0.11 Pa/cm3/s; P = .002, respectively). ExT, InT, and the difference between ExT and InT of three areas and overall airway were similar between pre-and post-surgery. No statistically significant correlations were found between intranasal mucosal temperature, VAS, NOSE, and NAR at pre-and post-surgery except for the difference between ExT and InT of overall airway and NOSE pre-operative (Pearson r = 0.57; 95% CI 0.06-1.09; P = .03).Endonasal thermal imaging can assess the intranasal mucosal temperature of a patient. However, more precise imaging of the nasal passages and data acquisition are required to establish mucosal temperature as an objective measure of nasal obstruction before and after nasal airway surgery in a clinical setting. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: When a standard dose of intranasal corticosteroid (INCS) fails to control symptoms of allergic rhinitis (AR), a double dose of INCS is optional. This systematic review aimed to assess the effects of double‐dose INCS. Methods: Literature searches were performed using MEDLINE and EMBASE. Randomized controlled trials that studied the effects of double‐dose INCS vs standard‐dose INCS for treating patients with AR were included. Data from the included studies were extracted and collected for meta‐analyses. The outcomes were nasal symptoms, ocular symptoms, and adverse events. Results: Twelve studies (4166 patients) met the inclusion criteria. There were 5 pediatric studies (1868 patients), 5 adult studies (1414 patients), and 2 studies with mixed populations (884 patients). The meta‐analysis results in adult patients favored the effects of double‐dose INCS on: total nasal symptom score (standardized mean difference [SMD] −0.25; 95% confidence interval [CI], −0.41 to −0.08; 4 studies; 568 patients) and total ocular symptom score (SMD −0.27; 95% CI, −0.52 to −0.03; 1 study; 259 patients). The meta‐analysis results in pediatric patients did not show the difference between groups on total nasal symptom score (SMD −0.16; 95% CI, −0.40 to 0.07; 3 studies; 801 patients). The meta‐analysis of ocular symptom score in pediatric patients had insufficient data. There were no differences between groups on adverse events. Conclusion: Double‐dose INCS showed better improvement in nasal and ocular symptoms in adult patients with AR when compared to the standard dose. These beneficial effects were not seen in the pediatric population. Adverse events between groups were not different. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]