Search

Abstract Active particles driven by chemical reactions are the subject of intense research to date due to their rich physics, being intrinsically far from equilibrium, and their multiple technological applications. Recent attention in this field is now shifting towards exploring the fascinating dynamics of active and passive mixtures. Here we realize active colloidal rafts, composed of a single catalytic particle encircled by several shells of passive microspheres, and assembled via light-activated chemophoresis. We show that the cluster propulsion mechanism transits from diffusiophoretic to diffusioosmotic as the number of colloidal shells increases. Using the Lorentz reciprocal theorem, we demonstrate that in large clusters self-propulsion emerges by considering the hydrodynamic flow via the diffusioosmotic response of the substrate. The dynamics in our active colloidal rafts are governed by the interplay between phoretic and osmotic effects. Thus, our work highlights their importance in understanding the rich physics of active catalytic systems.

Abstract Close links exist between vestibular function and cognition. Dual-task (DT) tests may have ecological validity to assess the impact of daily life cognitive-motor demands in people with vestibular dysfunction (PwVD), functional gait and falls risk. The present paper aimed at building predictive models for functional gait under DT conditions, while clarifying the impact of vestibular dysfunction, individual characteristics, varying task types and motor-cognitive demands. Case-controlled observational study with 39 PwVD and 62 healthy participants. The Functional Gait Assessment (FGA), with and without an additional motor, numeracy, or literacy task, was completed. Multiple linear regression was used to fit models to predict FGA under single and DT performance. Dual task cost (DTC, %) was calculated to assess DT interference on FGA performance using the equation: 100*(single task score–dual task score)/single-task score. Following Bonferroni corrections for multiple comparisons (corrected alpha level of 0.003), PwVD had poorer performance than controls for all FGA conditions (p

Maria Devita,1,2 Rossella De Salvo,1 Adele Ravelli,2 Marina De Rui,2 Alessandra Coin,2 Giuseppe Sergi,2 Daniela Mapelli1 1Department of General Psychology (DPG), University of Padua, Padua, Italy; 2Geriatrics Division, Department of Medicine (DIMED), University of Padua, Padua, ItalyCorrespondence: Maria Devita, Department of General Psychology, Via Venezia 8, Padua, 35128, Italy, Tel +390498218949, Email maria.devita@unipd.itAbstract: Depression is one of the most common mood disorders in the late-life population and is associated with poor quality of life and increased morbidity, disability and mortality. Nevertheless, in older adults, it often remains undetected and untreated. This narrative review aims at giving an overview on the main definitions, clinical manifestations, risk and protective factors for depression in the elderly, and at discussing the main reasons for its under/misdiagnosis, such as cognitive decline and their overlapping symptomatology. A practical approach for the global and multidisciplinary care of the older adult with depression, derived from cross-checking evidence emerging from the literature with everyday clinical experience, is thus provided, as a short and flexible “pocket” guide to orient clinicians in recognizing, diagnosing and treating depression in the elderly.Keywords: late-life depression, older adults, mood disorders, geriatric depression

Background: Late life depression (LLD) refers to major depressive disorder (MDD) in adults over 65 years. LLD is associated with high morbidity and poor treatment outcomes. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a novel treatment for MDD. Efficacy in LLD though is unclear. Our aim was to investigate tDCS efficacy by pooling randomised controlled trials (RCT) in an individual participant data meta-analysis. Methods: Databases were searched for sham controlled RCTs of tDCS in MDD and bipolar depression. Individual participant data (IPD) were requested. Primary outcome was change in depressive symptoms. Bayesian multilevel modelling meta-analysis was conducted with individual participants nested within studies. Results: 6 RCTs were eligible, consisting of 43 participants (22 women), mean age 69.2 years. Active anodal tDCS over left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (n = 19) was associated with an improvement in depressive severity, effect size 0.14 (95% credible interval [-0.44;0.15]) as compared to sham tDCS, which was not statistically significant. There was an 82% probability that tDCS treatment has a modest but non-null effect in improving depressive symptoms. Acceptability was high with no significant differences in discontinuation rates between active and sham groups. Limitations: The total sample size was small, limiting power. Discussion: In LLD, tDCS demonstrates a modest but non-null effect in improving depressive symptoms. Acceptability was high as measured by discontinuation rates. tDCS is a potential novel treatment option in LLD, though large scale RCTs in LLD are required to investigate this important clinical application.

Abstract Introduction People living with dementia in care homes often have sleep disturbances, but little is known about incidence and importance. Methods We interviewed 1483 participants in 97 care homes and report prevalence, 1‐year incidence, and baseline associations of clinically significant sleep disturbance in people with dementia. Results Baseline prevalence of clinically significant sleep disturbance was 13.7% (200/1460); 31.3% (457/1462) had them at least once over 16 months. One‐year incidence was 25.2%. At baseline, residents with sleep disturbance had lower quality of life (mean difference –4.84; 95% confidence interval [CI] –6.53 to –3.16) and were more frequently prescribed sleep medications (odds ratio 1.75; CI 1.17 to 2.61) than other residents. Discussion Approximately one‐third of care home residents with dementia have or develop sleep disturbances over 1 year. These are associated with lower quality of life and prescription of sedatives, which may have negative outcomes; therefore, it is important to develop effective treatments.

BackgroundSleep disturbances affect 38% of care home residents living with dementia. They are often treated with medication, but non-pharmacological interventions may be safer and effective yet more difficult to implement. In the SIESTA study (Sleep problems In dEmentia: interviews with care home STAff) we explored care home staffs' experience of managing sleep disturbances in their residents living with dementia.MethodsWe conducted one-to-one semi-structured interviews in four UK care homes, and purposively recruited a maximum variation sample of 18 nurses and care assistants, who were each interviewed once. We used a topic guide and audio-recorded the interviews. Two researchers independently analysed themes from transcribed interviews.ResultsStaff used a range of techniques that often worked in improving or preventing residents' sleep disturbance. During the daytime, staff encouraged residents to eat well, and be physically active and stimulated to limit daytime sleep. In the evening, staff settled residents into dark, quiet, comfortable bedrooms often after a snack. When residents woke at night, they gave them caffeinated tea or food, considered possible pain and discomfort, and reassured residents they were safe. If residents remained unsettled, staff would engage them in activities. They used telecare to monitor night-time risk. Staff found minimising daytime napping difficult, described insufficient staffing at night to attend to reorient and guide awake residents and said residents frequently did not know it was night-time.ConclusionsSome common techniques, such as caffeinated drinks, may be counterproductive. Future non-pharmacological interventions should consider practical difficulties staff face in managing sleep disturbances, including struggling to limit daytime napping, identifying residents' night-time needs, day-night disorientation, and insufficient night-time staffing.

ObjectivesThis research aims to validate a modified visually based Montreal Cognitive Assessment for hearing-aid users (MoCA-HA). This population should be the target of cognitive screening due to high risk of developing dementia.DesignCase-control study.SettingThe participants were recruited from referral hearing-aid center and memory clinic in central London, United Kingdom.Participant75 hearing-aid users were recruited. Of these, thirty were cognitively intact controls with hearing impairment (NC-HI); thirty had mild cognitive impairment with hearing impairment (MCI-HI); fifteen had dementia with hearing impairment (D-HI).MeasurementsThe baseline characteristics and analysis of the MoCA-HA for the NC-HI were recorded. The MoCA-HA performance of the MCI-HI cohort and D-HI cohort were also studied.ResultsThe cutpoint of

Summary: Background: The potential economic value of interventions to prevent late-onset dementia is unknown. We modelled this for potentially modifiable risk factors for dementia. Methods: For this modelling study, we searched PubMed and Web of Science from inception to March 12, 2020, and included interventions that: successfully targeted any of nine prespecified potentially modifiable risk factors (hypertension, diabetes, hearing loss, obesity, physical inactivity, social isolation, depression, cigarette smoking, and less childhood education); had robust evidence that the intervention improved risk or risk behaviour; and are feasible to enact in an adult population. We established when in the life course each intervention would be delivered. We calculated dementia incidence reduction from annual incidence of dementia in people with each risk factor, and population attributable fraction for each risk, corrected for risk factor clustering, and how effectively the intervention controls the risk factor. We calculated the discounted value of lifetime health gain and effect on cost (including NHS, social care and carer costs) per person eligible for treatment. We estimated annual total expenditure on the fully operational intervention programme in England. Findings: We found effective interventions for hypertension, smoking cessation, diabetes prevention, and hearing loss. Treatments for stopping smoking and provision of hearing aids reduced cost. Treatment of hypertension was cost-effective by reference to standard UK thresholds. The three interventions when fully implemented would save £1·863 billion annually in England, reduce dementia prevalence by 8·5%, and produce quality-adjusted life-year gains. The intervention for diabetes was unlikely to be cost-effective in terms of effect on dementia alone. Interpretation: There is a strong case for implementing the three effective interventions on grounds of cost-effectiveness and quality-of-life gains, as well as for improvements in general health. The interventions have the potential to remain cost-saving or cost-effective even with variations in dementia incidence and costs and effectiveness of interventions. Funding: Economic and Social Research Council.

As life expectancy increases, it is imperative that the elderly take advantage of the benefits of technology to remain active and independent. Mobile health applications are widely used nowadays as they promote a healthy lifestyle and self-management of diseases, opening new horizons in the interactive health service delivery. However, adapting these applications to the needs and requirements of the elderly is still a challenge. This article presents a smartphone application that is part of a multifactorial intervention to support older people with balance disorders. The application aims to enable users to self-evaluate their activity and progress, to communicate with each other and, through strategically selected motivational features, to engage with the system with undiminished interest for a long period of time. Mock-up interfaces were evaluated in semi-structured focus groups and interviews that were performed across three European countries. Further evaluation in the form of four pilot studies with 160 participants will be performed and qualitative and quantitative measures will be used to process the feedback about the use of the application.

Objectives: Hearing aid usage supports communication and independence; however, many do not use their hearing aids. This study explored the experiences of hearing aid use in adults with mild cognitive impairment or Alzheimer’s disease. Methods: Participants completed semi-structured interviews which were analysed using thematic analysis. Ten people (six males, age range 75–86 years old) with mild cognitive impairment or Alzheimer’s disease who had been fitted with hearing aids were recruited to the study. Results: We identified four major themes: (1) memory and other cognitive barriers to using hearing aids, (2) practical aspects of hearing aids, (3) benefits of hearing aids, and (4) ambivalence towards hearing aids. Conclusions: Participants perceived a significant impact of cognitive impairment on the experience of using hearing aids. This population may benefit from targeted strategies to support use of hearing aids. The findings from this study can inform future research to optimise use of hearing aids in this population.