Search

INTRODUCTION: Tapinarof is a topical aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) agonist in development for the treatment of atopic dermatitis (AD). In two phase 3 trials (ADORING 1 and 2), tapinarof cream 1% once daily (QD) demonstrated significant efficacy and was well tolerated in patients down to age 2 years with AD. Here, we evaluate patient-reported outcomes (PROs), including family impact, with tapinarof in ADORING 1 and 2. METHODS: In ADORING 1 and 2, 813 patients were randomized to tapinarof or vehicle QD for 8 weeks. PROs were assessed using the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), Childrens Dermatology Life Quality Index (CDLQI), Infants Dermatitis Quality of Life Index (IDQOL), Dermatitis Family Impact Questionnaire (DFI), and Patient Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM). RESULTS: Mean baseline DLQI, CDLQI, IDQOL, and DFI scores indicated that the impact on families and patients quality of life (QoL) of AD was moderate to very large. Mean POEM scores indicated moderate to severe AD symptoms at baseline. Tapinarof improved QoL versus vehicle across all endpoints at week 8: DLQI, - 6.2 vs - 3.5 (P = 0.0031) and - 5.5 vs - 3.5 (P = 0.0028); DFI, - 5.6 vs - 2.9 (P

Introduction Itch is the most bothersome symptom for patients with atopic dermatitis (AD), and has a significant negative impact on health-related quality of life. Rapid onset of pruritus relief with sustained efficacy is a key outcome for AD therapies. In ADORING 1 and 2, two identical pivotal phase 3, double-blind, vehicle-controlled trials, tapinarof cream 1% once daily (QD) demonstrated efficacy and was well tolerated in adults and children down to 2 years of age with AD. Objective Here, we evaluate time to onset of itch relief in the pivotal phase 3 trials. Methods In ADORING 1 and 2, patients with a Validated Investigator Global Assessment for Atopic DermatitisTM score of ≥3 (moderate or severe), an Eczema Area and Severity Index score of ≥6, and body surface area involvement of 5–35% were randomized 2:1 to tapinarof cream or vehicle QD for 8 weeks. Itch relief was assessed by changes in Peak Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (PP-NRS) score, daily and by visit, from baseline through Week 8. PP-NRS considers itch over the past 24 hours; lower scores indicate less pruritus. Results 407 and 406 patients were randomized in ADORING 1 and 2. At baseline, mean PP-NRS scores were 6.7 and 6.8 in both trials, respectively. For daily evaluations of itch from baseline, greater reductions in mean PP-NRS scores for tapinarof versus vehicle were observed as early as Day 1, 24 hours after initial application in ADORING 1 (–1.2 vs –0.9), and Day 2 in ADORING 2 (–1.6 vs –1.4). Daily itch improvements continued through Week 8 in both trials. Statistically significant reductions in mean weekly PP-NRS scores occurred as early as Week 1 (earliest assessment) with tapinarof versus vehicle (–2.0 vs –1.2 [ P <0.0001]) and (–2.0 vs –1.3 [ P =0.0010]) in ADORING 1 and 2, respectively. Significantly greater reductions in mean PP-NRS scores with tapinarof versus vehicle were seen for all visits through Week 8 (–4.1 vs –2.6 and –4.1 vs –2.4 [both P<0.0001]). Conclusions Tapinarof cream 1% QD demonstrated rapid, significant, and clinically meaningful pruritus relief from 24 hours after initial application, with improvements increasing through Week 8 in both trials in adults and children down to 2 years with AD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Roflumilast is a highly potent phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor under investigation as a non-steroidal, once-daily cream for atopic dermatitis (AD). Methods INTEGUMENT-PED (NCT04845620) was a Phase 3 parallel-group, double-blind, vehicle-controlled trial. Children aged 2 to 5 years with mild to moderate AD were treated with roflumilast cream 0.05% (n=437) or vehicle (n=215) once-daily for 4 weeks. The primary efficacy endpoint was validated Investigator Global Assessment-Atopic Dermatitis (vIGA-AD) Success (defined as a score of 0 [clear] or 1 [almost clear] with 2-grade improvement from baseline) at Week 4. Secondary endpoints included 75% improvement in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI-75). Worst-Itch-Numeric Rating Score (WI-NRS) Success (≥4-point improvement in patients with baseline ≥4), safety, and tolerability were also assessed. Results At Week 4, significantly more roflumilast-treated than vehicle-treated patients achieved vIGA-AD Success (25.4% vs 10.7%; P<0.0001), EASI-75 (39.4% vs 20.6%; P<0.0001), and WI-NRS Success (35.3% vs 18.0%; nominal P=0.0002). Improvement in pruritus was observed by 24 hours after first application (nominal P=0.0014 versus vehicle). Incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) was low in both arms, with 98.9% assessed as mild to moderate. AEs occurring in >2% of patients and greater in the roflumilast-treated group were upper respiratory tract infection, diarrhea, and vomiting. For local tolerability, >92% of roflumilast-treated patients reported no or mild sensation across arms at any timepoint. Conclusion In this phase 3 trial, once-daily roflumilast cream 0.05% improved AD in pediatric patients (2 to 5 years of age), while demonstrating favorable safety and tolerability. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction Itch is the most bothersome symptom for patients with atopic dermatitis (AD), with a significant negative impact on health-related quality of life. Rapid onset of pruritus relief with sustained efficacy is a key outcome for AD therapies. In a phase 2 trial in adults and adolescents with moderate to severe AD, tapinarof cream 1% once daily (QD) demonstrated efficacy versus vehicle and was well tolerated. Objective Here, we evaluate time to onset of itch relief in the pivotal phase 3 trials with tapinarof cream 1% QD in the treatment of adults and children down to 2 years of age with AD. Materials and Methods In ADORING 1 and 2, two identical, double-blind, vehicle-controlled trials, patients were randomized 2:1 to tapinarof cream 1% or vehicle QD for 8 weeks. Patients with a Validated Investigator Global Assessment for Atopic DermatitisTM score of ≥3, an Eczema Area and Severity Index score of ≥6, and body surface area involvement of 5-35% were included. Efficacy endpoints that evaluated itch relief were mean changes in Peak Pruritus-Numerical Rating Scale (PP-NRS) score (daily and by visit [Weeks 1, 2, 4, and 8]) from baseline through Week 8. The PP-NRS considers a person's worst itch over the past 24 hours, assessed on an 11-point scale (0 indicates "no itch" and 10 is "worst imaginable itch"). Daily PP-NRS scores were recorded in diaries. Patients aged ≥12 years self-completed the PP-NRS, while caregivers completed it for children aged <12 years. Results: 407 and 406 patients were randomized in ADORING 1 and 2. At baseline, mean (standard deviation [SD]) PP-NRS scores were 6.7 (2.4) and 6.8 (2.3) in both trials, respectively. For daily evaluations of itch from baseline, greater reductions in PP-NRS scores (mean [SD]) for tapinarof versus vehicle were observed as early as Day 1, 24 hours after initial application, in ADORING 1 (-1.2 [2.2] vs -0.9 [2.0]) and Day 2 in ADORING 2 (-1.6 [2.4] vs -1.4 [2.1]). Improvements in daily PP-NRS scores (mean [SD]) with tapinarof versus vehicle continued through the first 2 weeks (Day 14; -3.0 [2.8] vs -2.0 [2.4] and -2.9 [2.7] vs -1.8 [2.6]), and through Week 8 of both trials. There were statistically significant and clinically meaningful reductions in mean weekly PP-NRS scores as early as Week 1, the first assessment, for patients treated with tapinarof compared with vehicle (-2.0 vs -1.2 [P<0.0001]) and (-2.0 vs -1.3 [P=0.0010]), in ADORING 1 and 2, respectively. Significantly greater reductions in mean PP-NRS scores with tapinarof versus vehicle were seen for all visits through Week 8 (-4.1 vs -2.6 and -4.1 vs -2.4 [both P<0.0001]), for both trials. Conclusions: Tapinarof cream 1% QD demonstrated rapid, clinically meaningful, and significant onset of pruritus relief as early as 24 hours after initial application compared with vehicle. Improvements in itch with tapinarof cream increased through Week 8 in both trials in adults and children down to 2 years with AD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background/objectives: Efficacy and safety of roflumilast cream 0.15% were demonstrated in patients aged ≥ 6 years with atopic dermatitis (AD) in two Phase 3 trials. This Phase 3 parallel-group, double-blind trial (INTEGUMENT-PED; NCT04845620) compared the efficacy and safety of roflumilast cream 0.05% and a vehicle in patients aged 2-5 years with AD., Methods: Patients aged 2-5 years with mild-to-moderate AD were treated with once-daily roflumilast cream 0.05% or vehicle for 4 weeks. The primary efficacy endpoint was Validated Investigator Global Assessment for AD (vIGA-AD) Success (0 [Clear] or 1 [Almost Clear] plus ≥ 2-grade improvement from baseline) at Week 4. Other endpoints included ≥ 75% improvement in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI-75) and Worst Itch-Numeric Rating Score (WI-NRS) Success (≥ 4-point improvement in patients with baseline ≥ 4). Safety and tolerability were also assessed., Results: Among 437 and 215 patients treated with roflumilast and vehicle, respectively, significantly greater proportions of the roflumilast group achieved Week-4 vIGA-AD Success (25.4% vs. 10.7%; p < 0.0001), EASI-75 (39.4% vs. 20.6%; p < 0.0001), and WI-NRS Success (35.3% vs. 18.0%; nominal p = 0.0002). Improvement in pruritus was observed within 24 h after the first application (nominal p = 0.0014). Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) rates were low in both groups, and 98.9% were mild or moderate. At all timepoints, stinging/burning that caused definite discomfort was reported by ≤ 0.7% of caregivers of patients in the roflumilast group., Conclusions: In this Phase 3 trial, once-daily roflumilast cream 0.05% improved AD signs/symptoms in patients aged 2-5 years, with early pruritus improvement, low AE rates, and local tolerability comparable with vehicle., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04845620., (© 2024 The Author(s). Pediatric Dermatology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

An 89-year-old man with no significant medical history presented with a slow-growing, asymptomatic translucent blue mass noticed 1 year prior to evaluation. Review of symptoms was negative for constitutional symptoms, gastrointestinal (GI) disturbance, and visual complaints. Physical evaluation revealed a 4-mm firm light blue translucent papule on the left medial canthus (Figure 1). No cervical or axillary adenopathy was present. No further lesions were identified during full body skin examination, including chest wall masses. A diagnostic study was performed and stained with hematoxylin-eosin (Figure 2) and periodic acid-Schiff (Figure 3).

Multiples of certain cutaneous lesions should alert the clinician to a wider differential diagnosis and possible systemic associations although the individual skin lesion is often benign in nature and banal in appearance. This article focuses on such findings in selected multiple cutaneous lesions that may be classified according to the primary cutaneous feature as vascular, pigmentary, nevoid hamartomas, and tumors/neoplastic conditions. The clinical presentation of each entity and its significance, appropriate diagnostic evaluation, therapeutic and prognostic considerations and pertinent differential diagnoses will be reviewed.