Search

In this paper, we discuss the use of a 3rd harmonic component to the drive voltage on the grid of an inductive output tube (IOT). High-efficiency inductive output tubes (IOTs) are typically characterized by efficiencies up to 70 - 75%. However, the achievement of efficiencies greater than 80% would substantially reduce the operating costs of next-generation accelerators. In order to achieve this goal, we consider the addition of a 3rd harmonic component to the drive signal on the grid of an inductive output tube. The use of a 3rd harmonic drive component in IOT guns has been considered in order to apply such a gun as the injector [1] of radio frequency linear accelerators (RF linacs). Here we consider that the IOT will be used to provide the rf power to drive RF linacs and apply the 3rd harmonic with the intention of increasing the efficiency of the RF output of the IOT. We consider a model IOT with a 700 MHz resonant cavity and using an annular beam with a voltage of 30 kV, an average current of 6.67 A yielding a perveance of about 1.3e-6 P. We simulate this IOT using the NEMESIS simulation code [2] which has been successfully validated by comparison with the K5H90W-2 IOT developed by Communications and Power Industries. It is found that the effect of the 3rd harmonic on the efficiency is greatest when the phase of the 3rd harmonic is shifted by pi radians with respect to the fundamental drive signal and with 3rd harmonic powers greater than about 50% that of the fundamental drive power. For the present example, we show that efficiencies approaching 86% are possible by this means., Comment: 4 pages, 7 figures

NASA Cloud Aerosol Lidar with Orthogonal Polarization (CALIOP) Version 3.01 5-km nighttime 0.532 micron aerosol optical depth (AOD) datasets from 2007 are screened, averaged and evaluated at 1 deg X 1 deg resolution versus corresponding/co-incident 0.550 micron AOD derived using the US Navy Aerosol Analysis and Prediction System (NAAPS), featuring two-dimensional variational assimilation of quality-assured NASA Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) and Multi-angle Imaging Spectroradiometer (MISR) AOD. In the absence of sunlight, since passive radiometric AOD retrievals rely overwhelmingly on scattered radiances, the model represents one of the few practical global estimates available from which to attempt such a validation. Daytime comparisons, though, provide useful context. Regional-mean CALIOP vertical profiles of night/day 0.532 micron extinction coefficient are compared with 0.523/0.532 micron ground-based lidar measurements to investigate representativeness and diurnal variability. In this analysis, mean nighttime CALIOP AOD are mostly lower than daytime (0.121 vs. 0.126 for all aggregated data points, and 0.099 vs. 0.102 when averaged globally per normalised 1 deg. X 1 deg. bin), though the relationship is reversed over land and coastal regions when the data are averaged per normalised bin (0.134/0.108 vs. 0140/0.112, respectively). Offsets assessed within single bins alone approach +/- 20 %. CALIOP AOD, both day and night, are higher than NAAPS over land (0.137 vs. 0.124) and equal over water (0.082 vs. 0.083) when averaged globally per normalised bin. However, for all data points inclusive, NAAPS exceeds CALIOP over land, coast and ocean, both day and night. Again, differences assessed within single bins approach 50% in extreme cases. Correlation between CALIOP and NAAPS AOD is comparable during both day and night. Higher correlation is found nearest the equator, both as a function of sample size and relative signal magnitudes inherent at these latitudes. Root mean square deviation between CALIOP and NAAPS varies between 0.1 and 0.3 globally during both day/night. Averaging of CALIOP along-track AOD data points within a single NAAPS grid bin improves correlation and RMSD, though day/night and land/ocean biases persist and are believed systematic. Vertical profiles of extinction coefficient derived in the Caribbean compare well with ground-based lidar observations, though potentially anomalous selection of a priori lidar ratios for CALIOP retrievals is likely inducing some discrepancies. Mean effective aerosol layer top heights are stable between day and night, indicating consistent layer-identification diurnally, which is noteworthy considering the potential limiting effects of ambient solar noise during day.