Search

Objectives: To study the difference in patterns of utilization of eye-care services among white and African American senior citizens with eye disease and its impact on visual function., Methods: This study involved cross-sectional assessments of visual function using the Activities of Daily Vision Scale (ADVS), as well as retrospective self-recall of history of eye disease and frequency of ophthalmic assessments. Participants included 99 consecutive elderly patients with history of eye disease who were attending the outpatient medical clinics at Nassau University Medical Center, a community teaching hospital in Long Island, New York., Results: White Americans constituted 52% of the study sample and African Americans constituted the remaining 48%. African American subjects were less likely than whites to report visiting an eye specialist over the previous 5 years (69% versus 88%, P < 0.05). African American subjects who reported undergoing ophthalmic assessments over the past 5 years showed a trend of having higher ADVS scores (indicating better visual function) compared with those who did not report such history (86 +/- 12 versus 79 +/- 15, P = 0.098). On the other hand, reporting such history had no apparent relation to the ADVS scores in whites., Conclusions: African American elderly ambulatory medical patients with eye disease were less likely than their white counterparts to report use of eye-care services. The use of eye-care services in African American but not white subjects was linked to better visual function as assessed by the ADVS.

Objective: To evaluate the validity of the Activities of Daily Vision Scale (ADVS) as a tool to assess fall risk in older adults with vision impairment., Design: Cross-sectional assessments of visual function and retrospective collection of fall data., Setting: The outpatient medical clinics of an academic tertiary care community hospital., Participants: Randomly selected sample (n = 143) of older (> or = 65 years) patients seen at the outpatient medical clinics at Nassau County Medical Center in Long Island, New York. These patients had one or more of five ocular conditions: refractive errors (n = 90), cataracts (n = 77), glaucoma (n = 29), diabetic retinopathy (n = 19), and/or macular degeneration (n = 6)., Measurements: Visual function, assessed using the ADVS, demonstrated scores ranging from 0 (marked visual disability) to 100 (no visual difficulty). Fall history and the presence of eye disease were based on the self-recall of patients. Fall history was assessed retrospectively over a 1-year period from the time of the interview., Results: Thirteen percent of the subjects reported having one or more falls during the 1-year period before the time of the interview. These subjects scored significantly lower on the ADVS compared with the scores of the group that did not report falls (74 +/- 22 vs 85 +/- 14, P < .01). Using a cutoff score of 90 points (10% loss of visual function on the ADVS), the ADVS had a 67% sensitivity in identifying those patients who had falls. Among the patients with glaucoma and those with diabetic retinopathy, the ADVS had a 100% sensitivity in identifying those patients who reported a history of falls. In patients with cataracts and refractive errors, the ADVS had a sensitivity of 82% and 64%, respectively, in identifying patients with a history of falls. The number of falls reported by the subjects showed no relationship with the ADVS scores., Conclusion: The results from this study suggest that the ADVS may prove to be a useful tool to assess fall risk in older adults with vision impairment, especially in those persons with glaucoma, diabetic retinopathy, and/or cataracts.