Search

Objectives Aim was to report a prospective two-centre Singaporean experience using Endovenous Microwave Ablation (EMA) to treat symptomatic primary great saphenous vein reflux. We evaluated 1-year safety, efficacy and patient satisfaction. Methods 50 patients (63 limbs; 29 females; mean age 58.0 ± 12.1 years) were included. Patients were reviewed at 2-weeks, 3-, 6- and 12-months and underwent Duplex ultrasound assessment. Three quality of life (QoL) questionnaires were completed. Results The truncal closure rates at 2-weeks, 3-, 6- and 12-months were 63/63 (100%), 59/59 (100%), 58/58 (100%) and 59/60 (98.3%), respectively. There was 100% technical success and no serious adverse events. There were sustained improvement of QoL questionnaire scores from 2 weeks to 12 months. Conclusion EMA is a safe and efficacious venous ablative technology at 12 months and is associated with a high rate of target vein occlusion and sustained QoL improvement.

Purpose: The performance of sirolimus-coated devices has not been studied in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia patients. PRESTIGE aims to investigate the 6-month efficacy and safety profile of the Selution Sustained Limus Release (SLR) sirolimus-eluting balloon for treatment of TASC II C and D tibial occlusive lesions in patients with CLTI. Materials and Methods: PRESTIGE is a pilot prospective, nonrandomized, single-arm, multi-investigator, single-center clinical study. Endpoints were adverse event-free survival at 1 month, technical success rate, primary tibial patency at 6 months, limb salvage success, target lesion revascularization (TLR), and amputation free survival (AFS). Results: A total of 25 patients were included. There were 17 (68.0%) males; mean age, 63.7±9.73 years. CLTI severity was based on the Rutherford scale (R5=25/25; 100.0%). Significant comorbidities included diabetes mellitus (n=22; 88.0%) and end-stage renal failure (n=11; 44.0%). A total of 33 atherosclerotic lesions were treated (TASC II D=15 (45.5%)). Mean lesion length treated was 191±111 mm. Technical success was 100%. Primary tibial patency at 6 months was 22/27 (81.5%) and freedom from clinically driven TLR was 25/30 (83.3%). AFS was 21/25 (84.0%; 3 deaths and 1 major lower extremity amputation). Mean Rutherford score improved from 5.00 at baseline to 1.14±2.10 (pConclusions: Selution SLR drug-eluting balloon is a safe and efficacious modality in treating complex tibial arterial occlusive lesions in what is an otherwise frail cohort of CLTI patients, with a high prevalence of diabetes and end-stage renal failure. Technical and clinical success rates are high and 6-month target lesion patency and AFS are more than satisfactory.

Summary: Background: The aim was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a high pressure, non-compliant balloon in the treatment of infrapopliteal occlusive disease in Asian patients with chronic limb threatening ischaemia (CLTI) from Singapore. Patients and methods: Prospective, multi-centre, single arm, non-randomized study. Immediate technical success, 6-month primary vessel patency (determined by Duplex ultrasonography), limb salvage, one-year clinically driven target lesion re-intervention (TLR) and amputation free survival (AFS) were the efficacy endpoints of interest. Results: 86 patients (63% males, mean age 68.9 ± 9.9 years) were enrolled over a 15-month period. Diabetes mellitus (DM) and end-stage renal failure (ESRF) were present in 94% and 38% of patients respectively. All had some degree of tissue loss at baseline (Rutherford scale 5 and 6 = 91% and 9% respectively). Of the 86 legs, 72% had 3 crural vessel disease and 84% had moderate/severe vessel wall calcification. 90% had > = 1 TASC D tibial lesion. Acute technical success was 89%. One month mortality was 3.5% and one-year freedom from TLR was 91%. 6-month tibial patency was 73%. 54/66 (82%) patients had at least one target treated tibial artery open at 6 months. A lower baseline toe pressure (OR 1.03, 95%CI 1.00–1.05) and elastic recoil post angioplasty (OR 0.20, 95%CI 0.05–0.79) were associated with a worse 6 month tibial patency. One-year AFS was 67%. 47/66 (71%) patients had a clinical improvement of at least one Rutherford class at 6 months and 52/59 (88%) experienced complete wound healing at 12 months. Conclusions: Use of a high pressure non-compliant balloon is safe and efficacious in treating highly complex infra-popliteal atherosclerotic lesions in an otherwise challenging population of CLTI patients with a high incidence of DM and ESRF. It is associated with highly satisfactory acute technical success, 6-month target lesion patency and one-year limb salvage.

Ischaemic diabetic heel ulcers are difficult to treat and prognosis is often guarded. The aim was to document our outcome of treating heel ulcers following revascularization in a predominantly diabetic Asian cohort presenting with chronic limb threatening ischaemia from Singapore. Retrospective cohort study (n = 66, 66 limbs) over a 5‐year period. Data were collected from hospital electronic health records. Outcomes included time to healing, amputation free survival (AFS), and mortality. Minimum follow‐up period was 6 months. Multivariate regression analysis was performed to look for factors associated with poor outcome. Mean age was 67.4 ± 8.8 years. 62/66 (93.9%) were diabetics. Mean wound size at presentation was 3.6 ± 2.3 cm. Mean Wound, Ischaemia, Foot Infection (WIFI) score was 5 ± 1.6. 12/66 (18%) patients had a patent posterior tibial artery pre‐operatively. Straight line flow was restored in only 31/66 (46.9) patients but 47/66 (71.2%) had successful limb salvage. Median time to wound healing was 90.0 (IQR 60‐180) days. A median of 1 (IQR 0‐2) wound debridement was required. Patients who underwent negative pressure dressing (23/66; 34.8%) required a median of 26 (IQR 13‐33) cycles to achieve healing. Amputation free survival (AFS) was 72% and 68% at 6‐ and 12‐months, respectively. Mortality rate was 16.7% and 19.7% at 6‐ and 12‐months, respectively. Low albumin level and initial Rutherford class were independent predictors of worse 6‐month AFS. Outcomes of heel ulcers post revascularisation may not be as poor as previously described. Persistent attention to wound care with multidisciplinary effort is needed for optimal healing.

Introduction Medium-term outcome data are lacking for dedicated venous stents especially from the Asian population. Objectives Aim was to determine the 2-year patency and symptomatic relief gained from using the BD Venovo™ and Optimed Sinus Obliquus™venous stents for ilio-femoral obstruction (IFO). Methods 60 patients (71 limbs; 39 females; mean age of 66.4 ± 11.9 years) were included in this prospective dual centre Asian cohort. Clinical improvement was determined by change in the CEAP, rVCSS and pain scores. Stent patency and stenosis were measured using area reduction on CTV and diameter reduction on Duplex ultrasound. Results At 2 years, 65.7% showed ≥1 CEAP score improvement from baseline and rVCSS and pain scores remained low and sustained. 87.1% venous leg ulcers remained healed. Freedom from target lesion revascularisation was 94.3% and overall stent patency was 87.1%. There were no stent fractures or migration reported. Conclusion Dedicated venous stents for IFO were associated with sustained clinical improvement and a high freedom from reintervention at 2 years in Asian patients.

Background: The aim of this pilot clinical study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the Selution Sustained Limus Release (SLR)™ sirolimus-coated balloon (M.A. MedAlliance SA, Nyon, Switzerland) for improving the patency of failing arterio-venous fistulas (AVF) in hemodialysis patients. We also present herein a pre-clinical pharmacokinetic and safety evaluation of Selution™ to justify its first use in hemodialysis patients for endovascular access salvage. Methods and results: This is an investigator-initiated prospective single-center, non-blinded single-arm trial. Forty patients with clinically significant de novo or recurrent stenoses in a mature AVF circuit will be recruited. All stenotic lesions will be prepared with high pressure non-compliant conventional balloon angioplasty (CBA) prior to deployment of the Sustained-Release Selution™ sirolimus drug-eluting balloon. The primary efficacy endpoint is 6-month target lesion primary patency and the primary safety endpoint is freedom from localized or systemic serious adverse events through 30 days. Secondary endpoints of interest include technical and clinical success rates and circuit access patency at 3 and 6 months. Follow-up will occur for 2 years for those patients whose AVFs remain patent. Pharmacokinetic and histological animal safety studies performed with the Selution™ coating formulation showed prolonged arterial tissue retention of sirolimus with therapeutic levels up to 60 days and non-toxic and rapidly declining blood levels. Histological results in animal models demonstrated safety, freedom from intraluminal thrombus, reduction in restenosis by sirolimus elution compared to CBA, and no evidence of embolic phenomena indicative of adverse particulate effects. Discussion: Long release sirolimus coated balloons may serve as a promising novel alternative therapy to paclitaxel-based technology for treating conduit stenosis secondary to neointimal hyperplasia. Pre-clinical pharmacokinetic and histological animal data are encouraging and provide suggestion of safety and efficacy in this setting. This single-center trial will provide a first step toward demonstration of efficacy and safety of this device for treatment of stenotic fistulas.

Background: Aim of Arch V SUPERA-LUX was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the combination therapy of SUPERA™ ( Abbott Vascular, Santa Clara, CA, USA) helical stent implantation and Passeo-18 Lux™ ( Biotronik Asia Pacific Pte Ltd, Singapore) drug coated balloon (DCB) elution to treat recurrent cephalic arch stenosis (CAS) in the setting of AV access dysfunction. Methods: Investigator-initiated, single-center, single-arm prospective pilot study of 20 end-stage renal failure Asian patients with a dysfunctional brachiocephalic fistula. All had symptomatic recurrent CAS within 6 months of prior intervention. The lesion was pre-dilated with a standard high-pressure balloon (Biotronik Passeo-35 HP balloon). The DCB (Passeo-18 Lux™) is subsequently inflated and the SUPERA™ stent deployed to sit 2 mm distal to the cephalic arch and covering the CAS but within the DCB zone. All patients were prescribed dual antiplatelet therapy for 3 months and followed up with Duplex ultrasound at 6- and 12-months. Results: There were 9 (45%) males and mean age was 67 ± 11.0 years. Mean time from prior procedure was 113 ± 68 days and main indication for reintervention was high venous pressure (9/20, 45%). Technical success was 100% and there were no peri-procedural complications related to either stent or DCB deployment. Target lesion primary patency at 6- and 12-months was 10/18 (55%) and 5/16 (31%), respectively. Mean time to target lesion re-intervention was 170 ± 82 days. Circuit access patency was 8/18 (44%) and 2/16 (13%) at 6- and 12-months respectively and mortality was 3/20 (15%) attributed to the patients’ underlying co-morbidities. Conclusion: Dual prong strategy of using SUPERA™ stenting and Passeo-18 Lux™ drug elution for recurrent CAS, although safe, was no more efficacious than conventional balloon angioplasty or stenting alone. Development of an intense inflammatory reaction within the stent led to reinterventions of a number of cases with suboptimal results.