Search

Recent work on game-theoretic statistics and safe anytime-valid inference (SAVI) provides new tools for statistical inference without assuming any regularity conditions. In particular, the framework of universal inference proposed by Wasserman, Ramdas, and Balakrishnan (2020) offers new solutions by modifying the likelihood ratio test in a data-splitting scheme. In this paper, we study the performance of the resulting split likelihood ratio test under Gaussian mixture models, which are canonical examples for models in which classical regularity conditions fail to hold. We first establish that under the null hypothesis, the split likelihood ratio statistic is asymptotically normal with increasing mean and variance. Moreover, contradicting the usual belief that the flexibility of SAVI and universal methods comes at the price of a significant loss of power, we are able to prove that universal inference surprisingly achieves the same detection rate $(n^{-1}\log\log n)^{1/2}$ as the classical likelihood ratio test.

Invited discussion for Stat of "A note on universal inference" by Timmy Tse and Anthony Davison (2022)

Due to the lack of a canonical ordering in ${\mathbb R}^d$ for $d>1$, defining multivariate generalizations of the classical univariate ranks has been a long-standing open problem in statistics. Optimal transport has been shown to offer a solution in which multivariate ranks are obtained by transporting data points to a grid that approximates a uniform reference measure (Chernozhukov et al., 2017; Hallin, 2017; Hallin et al., 2021), thereby inducing ranks, signs, and a data-driven ordering of ${\mathbb R}^d$. We take up this new perspective to define and study multivariate analogues of the sign covariance/quadrant statistic, Spearman's rho, Kendall's tau, and van der Waerden covariances. The resulting tests of multivariate independence are fully distribution-free, hence uniformly valid irrespective of the actual (absolutely continuous) distribution of the observations. Our results provide the asymptotic distribution theory for these new test statistics, with asymptotic approximations to critical values to be used for testing independence between random vectors, as well as a power analysis of the resulting tests in an extension of the so-called (bivariate) Konijn model. This power analysis includes a multivariate Chernoff--Savage property guaranteeing that, under elliptical generalized Konijn models, the asymptotic relative efficiency of our van der Waerden tests with respect to Wilks' classical (pseudo-)Gaussian procedure is strictly larger than or equal to one, where equality is achieved under Gaussian distributions only. We similarly provide a lower bound for the asymptotic relative efficiency of our Spearman procedure with respect to Wilks' test, thus extending the classical result by Hodges and Lehmann on the asymptotic relative efficiency, in univariate location models, of Wilcoxon tests with respect to the Student ones., Comment: To appear in Bernoulli

In recent work, Azadkia and Chatterjee (2021) laid out an ingenious approach to defining consistent measures of conditional dependence. Their fully nonparametric approach forms statistics based on ranks and nearest neighbor graphs. The appealing nonparametric consistency of the resulting conditional dependence measure and the associated empirical conditional dependence coefficient has quickly prompted follow-up work that seeks to study its statistical efficiency. In this paper, we take up the framework of conditional randomization tests (CRT) for conditional independence and conduct a power analysis that considers two types of local alternatives, namely, parametric quadratic mean differentiable alternatives and nonparametric H\"older smooth alternatives. Our local power analysis shows that conditional independence tests using the Azadkia--Chatterjee coefficient remain inefficient even when aided with the CRT framework, and serves as motivation to develop variants of the approach; cf. Lin and Han (2022b). As a byproduct, we resolve a conjecture of Azadkia and Chatterjee by proving central limit theorems for the considered conditional dependence coefficients, with explicit formulas for the asymptotic variances., Comment: to appear in Bernoulli

Chatterjee (2021) introduced a simple new rank correlation coefficient that has attracted much recent attention. The coefficient has the unusual appeal that it not only estimates a population quantity first proposed by Dette et al. (2013) that is zero if and only if the underlying pair of random variables is independent, but also is asymptotically normal under independence. This paper compares Chatterjee's new correlation coefficient to three established rank correlations that also facilitate consistent tests of independence, namely, Hoeffding's $D$, Blum-Kiefer-Rosenblatt's $R$, and Bergsma-Dassios-Yanagimoto's $\tau^*$. We contrast their computational efficiency in light of recent advances, and investigate their power against local rotation and mixture alternatives. Our main results show that Chatterjee's coefficient is unfortunately rate sub-optimal compared to $D$, $R$, and $\tau^*$. The situation is more subtle for a related earlier estimator of Dette et al. (2013). These results favor $D$, $R$, and $\tau^*$ over Chatterjee's new correlation coefficient for the purpose of testing independence., Comment: to appear in Biometrika

Rank correlations have found many innovative applications in the last decade. In particular, suitable rank correlations have been used for consistent tests of independence between pairs of random variables. Using ranks is especially appealing for continuous data as tests become distribution-free. However, the traditional concept of ranks relies on ordering data and is, thus, tied to univariate observations. As a result, it has long remained unclear how one may construct distribution-free yet consistent tests of independence between random vectors. This is the problem addressed in this paper, in which we lay out a general framework for designing dependence measures that give tests of multivariate independence that are not only consistent and distribution-free but which we also prove to be statistically efficient. Our framework leverages the recently introduced concept of center-outward ranks and signs, a multivariate generalization of traditional ranks, and adopts a common standard form for dependence measures that encompasses many popular examples. In a unified study, we derive a general asymptotic representation of center-outward rank-based test statistics under independence, extending to the multivariate setting the classical H\'{a}jek asymptotic representation results. This representation permits direct calculation of limiting null distributions and facilitates a local power analysis that provides strong support for the center-outward approach by establishing, for the first time, the nontrivial power of center-outward rank-based tests over root-$n$ neighborhoods within the class of quadratic mean differentiable alternatives., Comment: 52 pages with title changed and more materials put in, including, particularly, a more general local power analysis covering many smooth alternatives beyond the Konijn ones

This paper investigates the problem of testing independence of two random vectors of general dimensions. For this, we give for the first time a distribution-free consistent test. Our approach combines distance covariance with the center-outward ranks and signs developed in Hallin (2017). In technical terms, the proposed test is consistent and distribution-free in the family of multivariate distributions with nonvanishing (Lebesgue) probability densities. Exploiting the (degenerate) U-statistic structure of the distance covariance and the combinatorial nature of Hallin's center-outward ranks and signs, we are able to derive the limiting null distribution of our test statistic. The resulting asymptotic approximation is accurate already for moderate sample sizes and makes the test implementable without requiring permutation. The limiting distribution is derived via a more general result that gives a new type of combinatorial non-central limit theorem for double- and multiple-indexed permutation statistics., Comment: to appear in JASA T&M

Testing mutual independence for high-dimensional observations is a fundamental statistical challenge. Popular tests based on linear and simple rank correlations are known to be incapable of detecting non-linear, non-monotone relationships, calling for methods that can account for such dependences. To address this challenge, we propose a family of tests that are constructed using maxima of pairwise rank correlations that permit consistent assessment of pairwise independence. Built upon a newly developed Cram\'{e}r-type moderate deviation theorem for degenerate U-statistics, our results cover a variety of rank correlations including Hoeffding's $D$, Blum-Kiefer-Rosenblatt's $R$, and Bergsma-Dassios-Yanagimoto's $\tau^*$. The proposed tests are distribution-free in the class of multivariate distributions with continuous margins, implementable without the need for permutation, and are shown to be rate-optimal against sparse alternatives under the Gaussian copula model. As a by-product of the study, we reveal an identity between the aforementioned three rank correlation statistics, and hence make a step towards proving a conjecture of Bergsma and Dassios., Comment: to appear in the Annals of Statistics

In this paper, we focus on three problems in deep learning based medical image segmentation. Firstly, U-net, as a popular model for medical image segmentation, is difficult to train when convolutional layers increase even though a deeper network usually has a better generalization ability because of more learnable parameters. Secondly, the exponential ReLU (ELU), as an alternative of ReLU, is not much different from ReLU when the network of interest gets deep. Thirdly, the Dice loss, as one of the pervasive loss functions for medical image segmentation, is not effective when the prediction is close to ground truth and will cause oscillation during training. To address the aforementioned three problems, we propose and validate a deeper network that can fit medical image datasets that are usually small in the sample size. Meanwhile, we propose a new loss function to accelerate the learning process and a combination of different activation functions to improve the network performance. Our experimental results suggest that our network is comparable or superior to state-of-the-art methods.

Pupil tracking is an important branch of object tracking which require high precision. We investigate head mounted pupil tracking which is often more convenient and precise than remote pupil tracking, but also more challenging. When pupil tracking suffers from noise like bad illumination, detection precision dramatically decreases. Due to the appearance of head mounted recording device and public benchmark image datasets, head mounted tracking algorithms have become easier to design and evaluate. In this paper, we propose a robust head mounted pupil detection algorithm which uses a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) to combine different features of pupil. Here we consider three features of pupil. Firstly, we use three pupil feature-based algorithms to find pupil center independently. Secondly, we use a CNN to evaluate the quality of each result. Finally, we select the best result as output. The experimental results show that our proposed algorithm performs better than the present state-of-art., Comment: It's out of date and not STOA any more