11 results on '"Shim, Kyungran"'
Search Results
2. Design of the Reducing Diagnostic Error to Improve Patient Safety (REDEfINE) in COPD and asthma study: A cluster randomized comparative effectiveness trial
- Author
-
Pacheco, Esther, Sohn, Augustine J., Wells, Christina, Sharp, Lisa K., Madrid, Samantha, Lee, Todd A., Chen, Yi-Fan, Yawn, Barbara P., Garcia, Diana, Shim, Kyungran, Quesada, Nancy, and Joo, Min J.
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
3. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Intensive Care Unit Patients
- Author
-
Laroia, Archana T., Donnelly, Edwin F., Henry, Travis S., Berry, Mark F., Boiselle, Phillip M., Colletti, Patrick M., Kuzniewski, Christopher T., Maldonado, Fabien, Olsen, Kathryn M., Raptis, Constantine A., Shim, Kyungran, Wu, Carol C., and Kanne, Jeffrey P.
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
4. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Hemoptysis
- Author
-
Olsen, Kathryn M., Manouchehr-pour, Shawdi, Donnelly, Edwin F., Henry, Travis S., Berry, Mark F., Boiselle, Phillip M., Colletti, Patrick M., Harrison, Nicholas E., Kuzniewski, Christopher T., Laroia, Archana T., Maldonado, Fabien, Pinchot, Jason W., Raptis, Constantine A., Shim, Kyungran, Tong, Betty C., Wu, Carol C., and Kanne, Jeffrey P.
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
5. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Rib Fractures
- Author
-
Henry, Travis S., Donnelly, Edwin F., Boiselle, Phillip M., Crabtree, Traves D., Iannettoni, Mark D., Johnson, Geoffrey B., Kazerooni, Ella A., Laroia, Archana T., Maldonado, Fabien, Olsen, Kathryn M., Restrepo, Carlos S., Shim, Kyungran, Sirajuddin, Arlene, Wu, Carol C., and Kanne, Jeffrey P.
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
6. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Lung Cancer Screening
- Author
-
Donnelly, Edwin F., primary, Kazerooni, Ella A., additional, Lee, Elizabeth, additional, Henry, Travis S., additional, Boiselle, Phillip M., additional, Crabtree, Traves D., additional, Iannettoni, Mark D., additional, Johnson, Geoffrey B., additional, Laroia, Archana T., additional, Maldonado, Fabien, additional, Olsen, Kathryn M., additional, Shim, Kyungran, additional, Sirajuddin, Arlene, additional, Wu, Carol C., additional, and Kanne, Jeffrey P., additional
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
7. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Hemoptysis.
- Author
-
Expert Panel on Thoracic Imaging, Olsen, Kathryn M, Manouchehr-Pour, Shawdi, Donnelly, Edwin F, Henry, Travis S, Berry, Mark F, Boiselle, Phillip M, Colletti, Patrick M, Harrison, Nicholas E, Kuzniewski, Christopher T, Laroia, Archana T, Maldonado, Fabien, Pinchot, Jason W, Raptis, Constantine A, Shim, Kyungran, Tong, Betty C, Wu, Carol C, and Kanne, Jeffrey P
- Abstract
Hemoptysis, the expectoration of blood, ranges in severity from nonmassive to massive. This publication reviews the literature on the imaging and treatment of hemoptysis. Based on the literature, the imaging recommendations for massive hemoptysis are both a chest radiograph and CT with contrast or CTA with contrast. Bronchial artery embolization is also recommended in the majority of cases. In nonmassive hemoptysis, both a chest radiograph and CT with contrast or CTA with contrast is recommended. Bronchial artery embolization is becoming more commonly utilized, typically in the setting of failed medical therapy. Recurrent hemoptysis, defined as hemoptysis that recurs following initially successful cessation of hemoptysis, is best reassessed with a chest radiograph and either CT with contrast or CTA with contrast. Bronchial artery embolization is increasingly becoming the treatment of choice in recurrent hemoptysis, with the exception of infectious causes such as in cystic fibrosis. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
8. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Rib Fractures.
- Author
-
Expert Panel on Thoracic Imaging:, Henry, Travis S, Donnelly, Edwin F, Boiselle, Phillip M, Crabtree, Traves D, Iannettoni, Mark D, Johnson, Geoffrey B, Kazerooni, Ella A, Laroia, Archana T, Maldonado, Fabien, Olsen, Kathryn M, Restrepo, Carlos S, Shim, Kyungran, Sirajuddin, Arlene, Wu, Carol C, and Kanne, Jeffrey P
- Abstract
Rib fractures are the most common thoracic injury after minor blunt trauma. Although rib fractures can produce significant morbidity, the diagnosis of injuries to underlying organs is arguably more important as these complications are likely to have the most significant clinical impact. Isolated rib fractures have a relatively low morbidity and mortality and treatment is generally conservative. As such, evaluation with standard chest radiographs is usually sufficient for the diagnosis of rib fractures, and further imaging is generally not appropriate as there is little data that undiagnosed isolated rib fractures after minor blunt trauma affect management or outcomes. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation frequently results in anterior rib fractures and chest radiographs are usually appropriate (and sufficient) as the initial imaging modality in these patients. In patients with suspected pathologic fractures, chest CT or Tc-99m bone scans are usually appropriate and complementary modalities to chest radiography based on the clinical scenario. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
9. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Lung Cancer Screening.
- Author
-
Expert Panel on Thoracic Imaging:, Donnelly, Edwin F, Kazerooni, Ella A, Lee, Elizabeth, Henry, Travis S, Boiselle, Phillip M, Crabtree, Traves D, Iannettoni, Mark D, Johnson, Geoffrey B, Laroia, Archana T, Maldonado, Fabien, Olsen, Kathryn M, Shim, Kyungran, Sirajuddin, Arlene, Wu, Carol C, and Kanne, Jeffrey P
- Abstract
Lung cancer remains the leading cause of cancer death in both men and women. Smoking is the single greatest risk factor for the development of lung cancer. For patients between the age of 55 and 80 with 30 or more pack years smoking history who currently smoke or who have quit within the last 15 years should undergo lung cancer screening with low-dose CT. In patients who do not meet these criteria but who have additional risk factors for lung cancer, lung cancer screening with low-dose CT is controversial but may be appropriate. Imaging is not recommended for lung cancer screening of patient younger than 50 years of age or patients older than 80 years of age or patients of any age with less than 20 packs per year history of smoking and no additional risk factor (ie, radon exposure, occupational exposure, cancer history, family history of lung cancer, history of COPD, or history of pulmonary fibrosis). The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
10. Part I. Colon cancer screening
- Author
-
Shim, Kyungran, primary
- Published
- 2000
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
11. ACR Appropriateness Criteria ® Lung Cancer Screening.
- Author
-
Donnelly EF, Kazerooni EA, Lee E, Henry TS, Boiselle PM, Crabtree TD, Iannettoni MD, Johnson GB, Laroia AT, Maldonado F, Olsen KM, Shim K, Sirajuddin A, Wu CC, and Kanne JP
- Subjects
- Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Diagnosis, Differential, Early Detection of Cancer, Evidence-Based Medicine, Humans, Lung Neoplasms etiology, Middle Aged, Patient Selection, Risk Factors, Smoking adverse effects, Societies, Medical, United States, Lung Neoplasms diagnostic imaging, Tomography, X-Ray Computed methods
- Abstract
Lung cancer remains the leading cause of cancer death in both men and women. Smoking is the single greatest risk factor for the development of lung cancer. For patients between the age of 55 and 80 with 30 or more pack years smoking history who currently smoke or who have quit within the last 15 years should undergo lung cancer screening with low-dose CT. In patients who do not meet these criteria but who have additional risk factors for lung cancer, lung cancer screening with low-dose CT is controversial but may be appropriate. Imaging is not recommended for lung cancer screening of patient younger than 50 years of age or patients older than 80 years of age or patients of any age with less than 20 packs per year history of smoking and no additional risk factor (ie, radon exposure, occupational exposure, cancer history, family history of lung cancer, history of COPD, or history of pulmonary fibrosis). The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment., (Copyright © 2018 American College of Radiology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.